05000334/FIN-2002003-03: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| identified by = NRC
| identified by = NRC
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152
| Inspector = D Silk, J Laughlin, R Conte
| Inspector = D Silkj Laughlin, R Conte,
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| CCA = N/A for ROP
| INPO aspect =  
| INPO aspect =  
| description = The inspectors identified an issue related to the adequacy of corrective actions regarding the PHADs. In a 1998 audit, the licensee had identified that there was no procedure to formalize PHAD maintenance and testing. In a subsequent audit, it was determined that the 1998 audit finding had been closed without addressing the issue. The licensee then developed a procedure to address the initial issue, however, the audit and corrective actions were narrowly focused on adequacy of documentation of PHAD testing but did not consider overall PHAD operability.
| description = The inspectors identified an issue related to the adequacy of corrective actions regarding the PHADs. In a 1998 audit, the licensee had identified that there was no procedure to formalize PHAD maintenance and testing. In a subsequent audit, it was determined that the 1998 audit finding had been closed without addressing the issue. The licensee then developed a procedure to address the initial issue, however, the audit and corrective actions were narrowly focused on adequacy of documentation of PHAD testing but did not consider overall PHAD operability.
}}
}}

Revision as of 19:21, 20 February 2018

03
Site: Beaver Valley
Report IR 05000334/2002003 Section 4OA2
Date counted Mar 31, 2002 (2002Q1)
Type: Finding:
cornerstone Emergency Prep
Identified by: NRC identified
Inspection Procedure: IP 71152
Inspectors (proximate) D Silkj Laughlin
R Conte
INPO aspect
'