ML20202J558: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:I | ||
. Page 1 of 2 cx EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS o | |||
CHANGE NOTICE: 001 COWROWD C ' | |||
PROCEDURE NO.: CPP-010 CONTROL No. R1_h o REVISION NO.: 7 ISSUE DATE: 05/15/86 (s | |||
b PREPARATION OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice. | |||
l l | |||
i Prepared by: Date: | |||
M!h Approved by: , , /u' at:/S Date: .T!/F[6$ | |||
On-Site QA Representa ve Approved by: . . 1 Date: f6% | |||
QA/p Review Team Lepder // | |||
8607170104 860711 PDR | |||
~ | |||
ADOCK 05000445 PDR | |||
. . I Changs Notica 001 CPP-010 73 | |||
; i Revision: 7 V' | |||
: 1. Delete the following portion of Section 4.4.3: | |||
, or an adverse trend analysis of the unclassified trend" | |||
: 2. Change the second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 5.2.2 to read: | |||
"Second reviewers determine when a deviation or set of related deviations constitute an unclassified deviation." | |||
: 3. Change Section 5.3.2, first paragraph, to read: | |||
"The QA/QC Records Administrator normally transmits copies of valid DRs received from the second reviewer (refer to Paragraph 5.2.2) to: | |||
. the SSEG Supervisor for analyses, | |||
. the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.3, and | |||
, the QA/QC Interface Coordinator for action as required per Reference 3.5. | |||
g is,) Valid DRs in the following categories are also transmitted to tbs Project Manager, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Reconciliation Project: | |||
LBCO PIWM LBSR SBPS SBC0 PBFA LBSN PWRE Unclassified DRs and those reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are transmitted to the SSEG Supervisor for information only, as safety-significant evaluations for those DRs are unwarranted. DRs reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are also transmitted to the appropriate first I | |||
reviewer for use in the collective evaluation." | |||
I bs 2}} | |||
Revision as of 08:46, 1 January 2021
| ML20202J558 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1986 |
| From: | Bajada E EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202J051 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-010, CPP-10, NUDOCS 8607170104 | |
| Download: ML20202J558 (2) | |
Text
I
. Page 1 of 2 cx EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS o
CHANGE NOTICE: 001 COWROWD C '
PROCEDURE NO.: CPP-010 CONTROL No. R1_h o REVISION NO.: 7 ISSUE DATE: 05/15/86 (s
b PREPARATION OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice.
l l
i Prepared by: Date:
M!h Approved by: , , /u' at:/S Date: .T!/F[6$
On-Site QA Representa ve Approved by: . . 1 Date: f6%
QA/p Review Team Lepder //
8607170104 860711 PDR
~
ADOCK 05000445 PDR
. . I Changs Notica 001 CPP-010 73
- i Revision
- 7 V'
- 1. Delete the following portion of Section 4.4.3:
, or an adverse trend analysis of the unclassified trend"
- 2. Change the second sentence in the first paragraph of Section 5.2.2 to read:
"Second reviewers determine when a deviation or set of related deviations constitute an unclassified deviation."
- 3. Change Section 5.3.2, first paragraph, to read:
"The QA/QC Records Administrator normally transmits copies of valid DRs received from the second reviewer (refer to Paragraph 5.2.2) to:
. the SSEG Supervisor for analyses,
. the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.3, and
, the QA/QC Interface Coordinator for action as required per Reference 3.5.
g is,) Valid DRs in the following categories are also transmitted to tbs Project Manager, Pipe Stress and Pipe Support Reconciliation Project:
LBCO PIWM LBSR SBPS SBC0 PBFA LBSN PWRE Unclassified DRs and those reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are transmitted to the SSEG Supervisor for information only, as safety-significant evaluations for those DRs are unwarranted. DRs reviewed by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator are also transmitted to the appropriate first I
reviewer for use in the collective evaluation."
I bs 2