ML20155J187

Provides Clarification to Wording of Certain Statements within Insp Repts 50-373/88-13 & 50-374/88-12 on 880411-15

ML20155J187
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	09/29/1988
From:	Allen C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
5166K, NUDOCS 8810250371
Download: ML20155J187 (2)

Text

.

• /

/^'N Commonwealth Edison

., ) One Fd National Ptaza Chicago, litinors k ~ ~~ J Address Reply to: Post Offc) Box 767

.(j Chicago, luinois 60690 0767 September 29, 1988 Mr. A. Bert Davis Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Subject LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2 Response to Inspection Report Nos.

50-373/88013 and 50-374/88012 HRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 Reference (a): Letter dated May 5, 198f from Bruce S.

Mallet transmitting Inspection Report Nos. 50-373/88013; 50-374/88012

Dear Mr. Davis:

This letter is in response to the inspection conducted by Mr. B.

Drouin on April 11-15, 1988 of Security activities at LaSalle County Station.

Reference (a) reported the results of that inspection in which no violations were identified. Commonwealth Edison (Ceco) would lika to provide some minor clarifications to the wording of certain statements within that report attributed to CECO. Those comments are included in Attachment A.

If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please I direct them to this office.

Very truly yours,

)k . .

C. M. Allen Nuclear Licensing Administrator j g goy

=

Attachment l

OCT l'l W33

\\\ i Sleen eggo2gggckSS Q

[

7

\

6 s

ATTACIRGICE_A CLARIFICATION TO INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-373/880131 50-374/88012 ITEM _1 Page 7, top paragraph, indicates that "...the Corporate' Nuclear Security Administrator (NSA) stated that a revised security plan submittal to NRC HQ, in response to the miscellaneous amendments, will contain a requirement to change security locks and keys if the system is suspected to be comprised for any reason." The correct words from the Security Plan subnittal are as follows..."Protected and Vital Area Locks and Keys will be rotated annually or whenever there is evidence of compromise." These words have been found acceptable and approved for security plans for.the other five CECO Nuclear Stations and indicated acceptable for LaSalle in u telecon with the NRC HQ Security Review 1r, R. Skelton. Based en this discussion, the words in the ~

Inspection Report, "for any_ reason" should be deleted..

lIEM_2 Page 10, second and fourth paragraphs, Indicates that the NRC expects that a Quality Assurance (QA) auditor he specifically qualified on the basic security Officer Appendix B tasks. Although the current QA inspector har been trained to the Security Forces Training and Qualification Plan and the I replacement QA inspector is scheduled to be similarly trained, CECO did not 1 intend this to change the LaSalle QA security inspector qualification l

< requirements.

Currently, eight out of twelve QA personnel assigned to LaSalle Station possess specific qualification to audit and survey the areas of j security and employee screening. Generally, when other types of training opportunities are made available in an area, QA personnel participate in order to "enhance" their qualification. Such is the case at LaSalle with the QA inspectors T&Q training and this enhanced training should not be considered to be a "committed requirement" for QA inspectors in the future at LaSalle or any l other CECO Station. '

i i i

[

i 5166K l 1

I

. . _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ __