IR 05000382/2012403: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:" " | {{#Wiki_filter:" " October 25, 2012 Donna Jacobs, Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 17265 River Road Killona, LA | Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751 | ||
SUBJECT: | SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2012403 | ||
==Dear Ms. Jacobs:== | ==Dear Ms. Jacobs:== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Four NRC identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process) were identified during this inspection. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the area. | Four NRC identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process) were identified during this inspection. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the area. | ||
If you contest any noncited violation (NCV) in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: | These four findings were also violations of NRC requirements. If you contest any noncited violation (NCV) in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3. | ||
Three of the findings were assigned crosscutting aspects in the area of Human Performance [H.1(b), H.1(c), and H.2(b)]. If you disagree with a crosscutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3. | Three of the findings were assigned crosscutting aspects in the area of Human Performance [H.1(b), H.1(c), and H.2(b)]. If you disagree with a crosscutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3. | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Sincerely,/RA/ | Sincerely,/RA/ | ||
Mark S. Haire, Chief | Mark S. Haire, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety | ||
Docket No.: | Docket No.: 50-382 License No.: NPF-38 Nonpublic | ||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report 05000382/2012403 | Inspection Report 05000382/2012403 | ||
===w/Attachment:=== | ===w/Attachment:=== | ||
Supplemental Information | Supplemental Information | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 18 February 2018
| ML12299A525 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/2012 |
| From: | Haire M S Plant Support Branch-1 |
| To: | Jacobs D Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| IR-12-403 | |
| Download: ML12299A525 (4) | |
Text
" " October 25, 2012 Donna Jacobs, Vice President, Operations Entergy Operations, Inc.
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057-0751
SUBJECT: WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000382/2012403
Dear Ms. Jacobs:
On September 13, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a security baseline inspection at your Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 13, 2012, with Ms. K. Cook, General Manager Plant Operations, and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspector reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Four NRC identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process) were identified during this inspection. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspector left the area.
These four findings were also violations of NRC requirements. If you contest any noncited violation (NCV) in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
Three of the findings were assigned crosscutting aspects in the area of Human Performance H.1(b), H.1(c), and H.2(b). If you disagree with a crosscutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspectors at Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). However, the material enclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. If Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
Sincerely,/RA/
Mark S. Haire, Chief Plant Support Branch-1 Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No.: 50-382 License No.: NPF-38 Nonpublic
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000382/2012403
w/Attachment:
Supplemental Information