Regulatory Guide 1.105: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML003740318
| number = ML993560062
| issue date = 02/28/1986
| issue date = 12/31/1999
| title = (Task IC 010-6), Instrument Setpoints for Safety-Related Systems
| title = Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RES
| author affiliation = NRC/RES
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket =  
| docket =  
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person = Aggarwal S (301)415-6005
| document report number = RG-1.105, Rev 2
| document report number = RG-1.105, Rev. 3
| document type = Regulatory Guide
| document type = Regulatory Guide
| page count = 4
| page count = 7
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:Revision 2*
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                                         Revision 3 December 1999 REGULATORY
                    0 ,;U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                                   February 1986 SREGULATO                                                          RY GUIDE
                                    GUIDE
                        OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH
                                    OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH
                                                      REGULATORY GUIDE 1.105 (Task IC 010-5)
                                                      REGULATORY GUIDE 1.105 (Draft was DG-1045)
                          INSTRUMENT SETPOINTS FOR SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS
                      SETPOINTS FOR SAFETY-RELATED INSTRUMENTATION


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
Any information collection activities mentioned in this regulatory guide are contained as requirements in 10 CFR
Criterion 13, "Instrumentation and Control," 1 of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, among other things, that instrumentation be provided to monitor variables and systems and that controls be provided to maintain these variables and systems within prescribed operating ranges.
    Criterion 13, "Instrumentation and Control," of                     Part 50, which provides the regulatory basis for this Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power                   guide. The information collection requirements in 10
Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of                       CFR Part 50 have been cleared under OMB Clear Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, among                 ance No. 3150-0011.


other things, that instrumentation be provided to moni tor variables and systems and that controls be provided                                           
Criterion 20, "Protection System Functions," of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, among other things, that the protection system be designed to initiate operation of appropriate systems to ensure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded.
 
Paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) of § 50.36, "Technical Specifications," of 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that, where a limiting safety system setting is specified for a variable on which a safety limit has been placed, the setting be so chosen that automatic protective action will correct the abnormal situation before a safety limit is exceeded. It also requires, among other things, that the licensee notify the NRC if the licensee determines that an automatic safety system does not function as required. The licensee is required to then review the matter and record the results of the review.
 
1 For the full text of the General Design Criteria and other sections of the regulations cited in this guide, see 10 CFR Part 50,
      "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities."
Regulatory guides are issued to describe and make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the NRCs regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the NRC staff in its review of applications for permits and licenses. Regulatory guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not required. Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.
 
This guide was issued after consideration of comments received from the public. Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experience. Written comments may be submitted to the Rules and Directives Branch, ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
 
Regulatory guides are issued in ten broad divisions: 1, Power Reactors; 2, Research and Test Reactors; 3, Fuels and Materials Facilities; 4, Environmental and Siting; 5, Materials and Plant Protection; 6, Products; 7, Transportation; 8, Occupational Health; 9, Antitrust and Financial Review; and 10, General.
 
Single copies of regulatory guides (which may be reproduced) may be obtained free of charge by writing the Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV. Many regulatory guides are also available on the internet at NRCs home page at <WWW.NRC.GOV>.
 
This guide describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRC's regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initially within and remain within the technical specification limits. The guide is being revised to endorse Part l of ISA-S67.04-1994,
"Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation." 2 This standard provides a basis for establishing setpoints for nuclear instrumentation for safety systems and addresses known contributing errors in the channel.
 
The information collections contained in this regulatory guide are covered by the requirements in
10 CFR Part 50, which were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-
0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.


==B. DISCUSSION==
==B. DISCUSSION==
to maintain these variables and systems within prescribed operating ranges.                                                             Revision I to Regulatory Guide 1.105, "Instrument Setpoints," was published in November 1976 in response Criterion 20, "Protection System Functions," of                       to the large number of reported instances in which Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, among other                        instrument setpoints in safety-related systems drifted things, that the protection system be designed to initiate                outside the limits specified in the technical specifications.
Instrument setpoint uncertainty allowances and setpoint discrepancies have led to a number of operational problems. Operating experience indicates that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation may allow plants to operate outside the limiting conditions of operation specified in their technical specifications. Licensees have discovered conflicts between existing setpoints and engineering calculations. The causes for these setpoint discrepancies were problems with industry practices that led to errors in calibration procedures and a lack of understanding of the relationship of the setpoint to the allowable value. Additional problems noted included varying setpoint methodologies for engineering calculations, a lack of a consistent definition of allowable value between different setpoint methodologies, and improper understanding of the relationship of the allowable value to earlier setpoint terminology, procedures, and operability criteria. Further problems were noted when procedures (the setpoint process)
(1) failed to provide an adequate margin between the instrument as-left criteria and the values (trip set point or allowable values) required per the technical specifications, (2) did not always reflect current design criteria, and (3) did not ensure that revised instrument loops were verified to the original design requirements or that instrument modifications were evaluated for their effect on setpoint calculations. It has also been noted that licensees do not typically verify whether setpoint calculation drift assumptions have remained valid for the system surveillance interval.
 
ISA-S67.04 was revised in 1987 to provide clarification and to reflect industry practic
 
====e. The term====
"trip setpoint" was made consistent with the terminology used by the NRC staff.
 
The standard was revised further in 1994. The effects of uncertainty allowances and discrepancies in setpoints, along with operational experience, were appropriately addressed during this revision of ISA-
S67.04. This revision of the standard also reflects the Improved Technical Specification program (a cooperative effort between industry and the NRC staff) and reflect current industry practice. This standard provides a basis for establishing setpoints for nuclear instrumentation for safety systems and addresses known contributing errors in a particular channel from the process (including the primary element and sensor) through and including the final setpoint device.


operation of appropriate systems to ensure that specified                Using the method described in Revision 1 to Regulatory acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded.                          Guide 1.105 and additional criteria on establishing and maintaining setpoints, Subcommittee SP67.04, Setpoints Paragraph (cXl)(ii)(A) of &sect; 50.36, "Technical Specifi                for Safety-Related Instruments in Nuclear Power Plants, cations," of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that, where a                        under the Nuclear Power Plant Standards Committee of limiting safety system setting is specified for a variable                the Instrument Society of America (ISA) has developed on which a safety limit has been placed, the setting be                  a standard containing minimum requirements to be used so chosen that automatic protective action will correct                  for establishing and maintaining setpoints of individual the most severe abnormal situation anticipated without                    instrument channels in safety-related systems. This stan exceeding a safety limit. It also requires the licensee to                dard is ISA-S67.04-1982, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety notify the NRC of any automatic safety system mal                        Related Instrumentation Used in Nuclear Power Plants."e*
The term "trip setpoint" is retained in ISA-S67.04-1994. However, Figure 1 in ISA-S67.04-1994 (for convenience, this figure has been reproduced as Figure 1 in this guide) has been revised to depict region "E," "a region of calibration tolerance." The calibration tolerance uncertainties depicted by region
functions, to review the matter, and to record the results of the review. Setpoints that exceed technical                        Some key terms used throughout ISA-S67.04-1982 specification limits are considered a malfunction of an                  are not defined or have unclear applications. For cun automatic safety system.                                                  venience, the following information is provided: (1)
2 Copies may be obtained from the Instrument Society of America, 67 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
                                                                          the definition of the term "safety limit" is contained in This guide describes a method acceptable to the NRC                  1 50.36 of 10 CFR Part 50, (2) the term "allowable staff for complying with the Commission's regulations                    value" as used in the standard is consistent with the for ensuring that instrument setpoints are initially within              usage in the bases sections of the Standard Technical and remain within the technical specification limits.                     Specification (STS),*** (3) the term "upper setpoint
20779.
                                                                              "Copies are available from the Instrument Society of America, The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards has                      P.O. Box 12277, Research Triangle Park, North CarolinaSpecifica
                                                                                                                                        27709.


***NUREG-0103, Revision 4, "Standard Technical been consulted concerning this guide and has concurred                    tions for Babcock and Wilcox Pressurized Water Reactors"; NUREG
2
                                                                          0123. Revision 3, "Standard Technical Specifications for General in the regulatory position.                                                Electric Boiling Water Reactors (BWR/S)"; NUREG-0212, Revision
                                                                          2, "Standard Technical Specifications for Combustion Engineering Pressurized Water Reactors"; and NUREG-0452.- Revision 4. "Stan dard Technical Specifications for Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors." Copies of NUREG-series documents may be purchased iMe substantial number of changes in this revision thas made it      from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Goverrunent Print.


Impractical to indicate the changes with lines in the margin.              ing Office, Poet Office Box 37082, Washihston, DC 20013-7082.
"E" should be defined and accounted for in the licensees setpoint methodology. A trip setpoint value identified to be outside region "E" regardless of direction requires readjustment to satisfy the setpoint methodology and uncertainties identified in Figure 1 (acceptable as-left condition). It should be noted that this standard does not define "nominal" trip setpoint. The trip setpoint as depicted in Figure 1 is consistent with the term "nominal" trip setpoint as shown about a defined calibration tolerance band.


USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES                                  Written comments may be suomitted to the Rules and Procedures Branch, DRR ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guides are Issued to describe and make avallable to the       Washington, oC 20555.
Figure 1 of the standard provides setpoint relationships for nuclear safety-related setpoints. The figure denotes relative position and not direction, but it should be noted that the uncertainty relationships depicted by Figure 1 do not represent any one particular method (direction, combination, or relationship of uncertainty groupings) for the development of a trip setpoint or allowable value.


public methods acceptable to the NRC staff of Implementing specific parts of the Commission's regulations, to delineate tech niques used by the staff In evaluating specific problems or postu-       The guideo  are issuea in tne following tun broad divisions:
Section 4 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the safety significance of various types of setpoints for safety-related instrumentation may differ, and thus a less rigorous setpoint determination method may be applied for certain functional units and limiting conditions of operation (LCOs). A setpoint methodology can include such a graded approach. However, the grading technique chosen by the licensee should be consistent with the standard and should consider applicable uncertainties regardless of the setpoint application. Additionally, the application of the standard, using a "graded" approach, is also appropriate for non-safety system instrumentation for maintaining design limits described in the Technical Specifications. Examples may include instrumentation relied on in emergency operating procedures (EOPS), and for meeting applicable LCOs, and for meeting the variables in Regulatory Guide
lated accidents or to provide guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with          1.  Power Reactors                  6. Products them Is not required. Methods and solutions different from those set      2. Research and Test Reactors      7. Transportation Out in the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the     3.  Fuels and Materials Facilities 5. Occupational Health findings requisite to the Issuance or continuance of a permit or          4. Environmental and Siting        9. Antitrust and Financial Review license by the Commission.                                               5. Materials and Plant Protection 10. General This guide was Issued after consideration of comments received from      Copies of issued guides may be purchased at the current Government the public. Comments and suggestions for Improvements In these            Printing Office price. Information on current GPO prices may be guides are encouraged at all times, and guides will be revised, as        obtained by contacting the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
1.97, "Instrumentation for Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants To Assess Plant and Environs Conditions During and Following an Accident." 3 The industry consensus standard ANSI/ANS-10.4-1987, "Guidelines for the Verification and Validation of Scientific and Engineering Computer Programs for the Nuclear Industry," provides helpful information on the qualification of setpoint methodology software.


appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new Informa-         Government Printing Office. Post" Office Box 37082 Wasnhngton, tlon or experience.                                                       DC 20013-7082. telephone (202)275-2060 or (202)27h-2171.
ISA-S67.04-1982 has been used by licensees for setpoint methodology and instrument drift evaluations. ISA-S67.04-1994 provides limited guidance on drift evaluations and uncertainty term development for the evaluation of an instrument surveillance interval. The
3 Single copies of regulatory guides, both active and draft, may be obtained free of charge by writing the Office of Administration, Attn: Reproduction and Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to <DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV>. Copies are also available for inspection or copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room at 2120 L Street NW.,
Washington, DC; the PDRs mailing address is Mail Stop LL-6, Washington, DC 20555; telephone (202)634-3273;
fax (202)634-3343.


==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
3
limit" as used in Figure 1 of the standard is the same as "trip setpoints" as used in the aforementioned STSs                  ISA-$67.04-1982, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety in that drift above the "upper setpoint limit" (standard)          Related Instrumentation Used in Nuclear Power Plants,'
 
or "trip setpoint" (STSs) requires readjustment.                   establishes requirements acceptable to the NRC staff for ensuring that instrument setpoints in safety-related Paragraph 4.3 of the standard specifies the methods            systems are initially within and remain within the for combining uncertainties in determining a trip set              technical specification limits. The last section of ISA
S a fe ty L im it A n a lytica l L im it N o te :    T h is fig u re is in te n d e d to p ro vid e re la tive p o sitio n a n d n o t to im p ly d ire ctio n .
point and its allowable values. Typically, the NRC staff            S67.04-1982 lists additional standards that are referenced has accepted 95% as a probability limit for errors. That            in other sections of the standard. Those referenced is, of the observed distribution of values for a particular        standards not endorsed by a regulatory guide (or incor error component in the empirical data base, 95% of the              porated into the regulations) also contain valuable data points will be bounded by the value selected. If              information and, if used, should be used in a manner the data base follows a normal distribution, this corres            consistent with current regulations.
                              A                                                    C
                                                                                              A llo w a b le V a lu e (L S S S )
                                                                                      B
                                                                                                  T rip E                                        S e tp o in t (L S S S )
                                D
                                                N o rm a l A. A llo w a n ce d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 B. A llo w a n ce d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 C. R e g io n w h e re ch a n n e l m a y b e d e te rm in e d in o p e ra b le D. P la n t o p e ra tin g m a rg in E. R e g io n o f ca lib ra tio n to le ra n ce (a cce p ta b le a s le ft co n d itio n )
  d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 Figure 1. Nuclear Safety-Related Setpoint Relationships
                                                    4
 
(Reproduced from ISA-67.04-1994)
                5
 
staff has generally accepted drift evaluations based on statistical prediction techniques. However, significant variability has been observed in licensees surveillance interval evaluations with regard to drift, setpoint methodology, and completeness. The following concerns were identified during the NRC staff review, but they have been resolved during the development of ISA-S67.04-1994.
 
+        Limited instrument drift data were included in the licensee setpoint study.
 
+        Drift data account for all data points from a surveillance calibration (i.e., nine-point check) as independent data, but inadequate justification is provided for this assumption. Drift data points also included interim calibrations.
 
+        A large number of data points was provided for a limited number of instruments.
 
+        Flawed outlier analysis resulted in valid data being removed from the data set.
 
+        Drift dependency on time was assumed to be negligible over the interval selected, and inadequate justification was provided when extrapolating to an extended surveillance interval (e.g., 24 months).
+        Setpoint methodology assumes normal distribution of data when such an assumption was not verified.
 
+        Instrumentation evaluations (historical, maintenance, drift) were incomplete.
 
+        Drift projections, including those based on regression analyses, may not account for penalties for uncertainty projection (extended surveillance interval-drift) beyond the time range for the data collected.
 
+        Instrument application and process or installation variables were not evaluated.


ponds to an error distribution approximately equal to a "two sigma" value.
+        The uncertainties assumed for instrumentation, including primary elements, were subsequently not verified or controlled through surveillance testing, qualification, or maintenance programs.


==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
+        The acceptability of pooling generic drift data with plant-specific data or weighing the data according to the source of the data was not justified.
Section 6 requires that "software qualification" be documented. Although there is no generally accepted                    The purpose of this section is to provide information definition in the nuclear industry for software qualifica          to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC staff's tion, the industry has used ANSI/IEEE-ANS-7-4.3.2-1982,            plans for using this regulatory guide.


"Application Criteria for Programmable Digital Computer Systems in Safety Systems of Nuclear Power Generating                  Except in those cases in which the applicant or li Stations," for verification and validation of computer              censee proposes an acceptable alternative method for software used in safety-related systems. Regulatory                complying with specified portions of the Commission's Guide 1.152, "Criteria for Programmable Digital Com                regulations, the methods described in this guide will puter System Software in Safety-Related Systems of                  be used by the NRC staff in the evaluation of instru Nuclear Power Plants," endorses this standard.                      ment setpoints for safety-related systems with respect to the technical specification limits for the following Some of the considerations in documenting setpoint              nuclear power plants:
+        All available applicable data were not utilized in the analysis.
  drift are (1) the degree of redundancy of the channels for which the allowable limits have been exceeded, (2)                  1. Plants for which the constructi6n permit is issue the type of instrument, including the instrument's                  after February 1986.


designed accuracy, function, and plant identification number, (3) the allowable value in the technical specifi              2. Plants for which the operating license applica cations, (4) the "as left" setpoint from prior surveillance,        tion is docketed 6 months or more after February 1986.
Section 4.3 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the limiting safety system setting (LSSS) may be the trip setpoint, an allowable value, or both. For the standard technical specifications, the staff designated the allowable value as the LSSS. In association with the trip setpoint and limiting conditions for operation (LCOs), the LSSS establishes the threshold for protective system action to prevent acceptable limits being exceeded during design basis accidents. The LSSS therefore ensures that automatic protective action will correct the abnormal situation before a safety limit is exceeded. A licensee, with justification, may propose an alternative LSSS based on its particular setpoint methodology or license.


(5) the measured setpoint, (6) the amount of adjustment in the reported occurrence and the current "as left"                    3. Plants for which the applicant or licensee vol setpoint, and (7) the history of previous testing and the          untarily commits to the provisions of this guide.
The standard provides for the accounting of measurement and test equipment (MTE) uncertainties, but MTE criteria are not specifically identified within the standard. Criteria XI and XII in Appendix B to
                                                        6


amount of any drift and adjustment in previous testing.
10 CFR Part 50 provide requirements for quality regarding testing. Regulatory Guide 1.118, "Periodic Testing of Electric Power and Protection Systems," 3 provides guidance on periodic surveillance testing.


1.105-2
Part II, "Methodologies for the Determination of Setpoints for the Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation," of ISA-S67.04-1994 is not addressed by this regulatory guide.


VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT
==C. REGULATORY POSITION==
                                                                  guidance on establishing and maintaining setpoints in
Conformance with Part 1 of ISA-S67.04-1994, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related
                    2 Instrumentation," with the following exceptions and clarifications, provides a method acceptable to the NRC staff for satisfying the NRC's regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are established and maintained within the technical specification limits.


===1. BACKGROUND===
1.       Section 4 of ISA-S67.04-1994 specifies the methods, but not the criterion, for combining uncertainties in determining a trip setpoint and its allowable values. The 95/95 tolerance limit is an acceptable criterion for uncertainties. That is, there is a 95% probability that the constructed limits contain
                                                                  response to the needs that were apparent from (1) a continuing large number of reportable occurrences and The most common cause of a setpoint in a safety
95% of the population of interest for the surveillance interval selected.
                                                                  (2) the licensing review of methodology for specifying related system being out of compliance with plant                allowable values and trip setpoints.


.technical specifications has been the failure to allow for a sufficient margin to account for instrument inaccura
2.       Sections 7 and 8 of Part 1 of ISA-S67.04-1994 reference several industry codes and standards. If a referenced standard has been incorporated separately into the NRC's regulations, licensees and applicants must comply with that standard as set forth in the regulation. If the referenced standard has been endorsed in a regulatory guide, the standard constitutes a method acceptable to the NRC staff of meeting a regulatory requirement as described in the regulatory guide. If a referenced standard has been neither incorporated into the NRC's regulations nor endorsed in a regulatory guide, licensees and applicants may consider and use the information in the referenced standard if appropriately justified, consistent with current regulatory practice.
                                                                  2. VALUE/IMPACT ASSESSMENT
cies, expected environmental drift, and minor calibration variations. For example, in some cases, the trip setpoint        2.1   General selected was numerically equal to the allowable value and stated as an "absolute value," thus leaving no ISA-S67.04-1982 is considered state-of-the-art meth apparent margin for drift. In other cases, the trip odology for specifying and reviewing technical specifica setpoint was so close to the upper or lower limit of the tions on allowable values and trip setpoints, and mem range of the instrument that instrument drift placed the bers of the industry have incorporated this standard setpoint beyond the range of the instrument, thus into their internal procedures. Further, paragraphs nullifying the trip function. Other general causes for a
                                                                  50.73(a) and (b) of 10 CFR Part 50 define when an setpoint being out of conformity with the technical LER is required and what is to be included in an LER,
specifications have been instrument design inadequacies          respectively.


and questionable calibration procedures.
3.        Section 4.3 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the limiting safety system setting (LSSS) may be maintained in technical specifications or appropriate plant procedures. However, 10 CFR 50.36 states that the technical specifications will include items in the categories of safety limits, limiting safety system settings, and limiting control settings. Thus, the LSSS may not be maintained in plant procedures. Rather, the LSSS must be specified as a technical-specification-defined limit in order to satisfy the requirements of
10 CFR 50.36. The LSSS should be developed in accordance with the setpoint methodology set forth in the standard, with the LSSS listed in the technical specifications.


2.2  Value Revision I to Regulatory Guide 1.105, "Instrument Setpoints," was issued in November 1976 in response to The value to NRC operations and industry- is that the large number of instances reported in Licensee there would be (1) a systematic method for specifying Event Reports (LERs) of setpoints drifting outside and reviewing technical specifications on allowable values the limits specified in the technical specifications.
4.       ISA-S67.04-1994 provides a discussion on the purpose and application of an allowable value. The allowable value is the limiting value that the trip setpoint can have when tested periodically, beyond which the instrument channel is considered inoperable and corrective action must be taken in accordance with the technical specifications. The allowable value relationship to the setpoint methodology and testing requirements in the technical specifications must be documented.


and trip setpoints, (2) more sophisticated methods Revision I provided general guidance for (1) specifying for specifying technical specifications, (3) a reduction in setpoints (by considering instrument drift, accuracy, and range) and (2) having a securing device for the set              setpoint readjustments, (4) less chance for unwarranted reactor shutdown, and (5) fewer LERs and other report point adjustment mechanism.
==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
The purpose of the section is to provide information to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC
staff's plans for using this regulatory guide.


able occurrences from the allowable limits of setpoints being exceeded.
7


The method described in Revision I to Regulatory Guide 1.105 has been incorporated into an Instrument
Except in those cases in which an applicant or licensee proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the NRC's regulations, the methods described in this guide will be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with applications for construction permits, operating licenses, and combined licenses. It will also be used to evaluate submittals from operating reactor licensees who voluntarily propose to initiate system modifications if there is a clear nexus between the proposed modifications and this guidance.
                                                                    2.3  Impact Society of America Standard, ISA-$67.04-1982, "Set points for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation Used The impact would be minimal as ISA-$67.04-1982 in Nuclear Power Plants." Revision 2 to Regulatory represents current industry practice that has been codified Guide 1.105 was developed to use the guidance of in a national consensus standard.


ISA-$67.04-1982. This revision provides more specific
8
                                                            1.105-3


UNITED STATES              FIRST CLASS MAIL
VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT
                                  POSTAGE & FEES PAID
         A draft value/impact statement was published with the draft proposed Revision 3 of this guide when it was published for public comment (DG-1045, October 1996). No changes were necessary, so a separate value/impact statement for the final guide has not been prepared. A copy of the draft value/impact statement is available for inspection or copying for a fee in the NRCs Public Document Room at 2120 L
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION         USNNCI
Street NW., Washington, DC under task DG-1045.
                                        WASH. D.C.


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555          PERMIT No. G-67 OFFICIAL BUSINESS
9}}
    PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $300}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Revision as of 23:11, 12 April 2020

Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation
ML993560062
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/31/1999
From:
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
To:
Aggarwal S (301)415-6005
References
RG-1.105, Rev. 3
Download: ML993560062 (7)


U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 3 December 1999 REGULATORY

GUIDE

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.105 (Draft was DG-1045)

SETPOINTS FOR SAFETY-RELATED INSTRUMENTATION

A. INTRODUCTION

Criterion 13, "Instrumentation and Control," 1 of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, among other things, that instrumentation be provided to monitor variables and systems and that controls be provided to maintain these variables and systems within prescribed operating ranges.

Criterion 20, "Protection System Functions," of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 requires, among other things, that the protection system be designed to initiate operation of appropriate systems to ensure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded.

Paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) of § 50.36, "Technical Specifications," of 10 CFR Part 50 requires, in part, that, where a limiting safety system setting is specified for a variable on which a safety limit has been placed, the setting be so chosen that automatic protective action will correct the abnormal situation before a safety limit is exceeded. It also requires, among other things, that the licensee notify the NRC if the licensee determines that an automatic safety system does not function as required. The licensee is required to then review the matter and record the results of the review.

1 For the full text of the General Design Criteria and other sections of the regulations cited in this guide, see 10 CFR Part 50,

"Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities."

Regulatory guides are issued to describe and make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the NRCs regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the NRC staff in its review of applications for permits and licenses. Regulatory guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not required. Methods and solutions different from those set out in the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.

This guide was issued after consideration of comments received from the public. Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all times, and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experience. Written comments may be submitted to the Rules and Directives Branch, ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Regulatory guides are issued in ten broad divisions: 1, Power Reactors; 2, Research and Test Reactors; 3, Fuels and Materials Facilities; 4, Environmental and Siting; 5, Materials and Plant Protection; 6, Products; 7, Transportation; 8, Occupational Health; 9, Antitrust and Financial Review; and 10, General.

Single copies of regulatory guides (which may be reproduced) may be obtained free of charge by writing the Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV. Many regulatory guides are also available on the internet at NRCs home page at <WWW.NRC.GOV>.

This guide describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRC's regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initially within and remain within the technical specification limits. The guide is being revised to endorse Part l of ISA-S67.04-1994,

"Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation." 2 This standard provides a basis for establishing setpoints for nuclear instrumentation for safety systems and addresses known contributing errors in the channel.

The information collections contained in this regulatory guide are covered by the requirements in

10 CFR Part 50, which were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-

0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

B. DISCUSSION

Instrument setpoint uncertainty allowances and setpoint discrepancies have led to a number of operational problems. Operating experience indicates that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation may allow plants to operate outside the limiting conditions of operation specified in their technical specifications. Licensees have discovered conflicts between existing setpoints and engineering calculations. The causes for these setpoint discrepancies were problems with industry practices that led to errors in calibration procedures and a lack of understanding of the relationship of the setpoint to the allowable value. Additional problems noted included varying setpoint methodologies for engineering calculations, a lack of a consistent definition of allowable value between different setpoint methodologies, and improper understanding of the relationship of the allowable value to earlier setpoint terminology, procedures, and operability criteria. Further problems were noted when procedures (the setpoint process)

(1) failed to provide an adequate margin between the instrument as-left criteria and the values (trip set point or allowable values) required per the technical specifications, (2) did not always reflect current design criteria, and (3) did not ensure that revised instrument loops were verified to the original design requirements or that instrument modifications were evaluated for their effect on setpoint calculations. It has also been noted that licensees do not typically verify whether setpoint calculation drift assumptions have remained valid for the system surveillance interval.

ISA-S67.04 was revised in 1987 to provide clarification and to reflect industry practic

e. The term

"trip setpoint" was made consistent with the terminology used by the NRC staff.

The standard was revised further in 1994. The effects of uncertainty allowances and discrepancies in setpoints, along with operational experience, were appropriately addressed during this revision of ISA-

S67.04. This revision of the standard also reflects the Improved Technical Specification program (a cooperative effort between industry and the NRC staff) and reflect current industry practice. This standard provides a basis for establishing setpoints for nuclear instrumentation for safety systems and addresses known contributing errors in a particular channel from the process (including the primary element and sensor) through and including the final setpoint device.

The term "trip setpoint" is retained in ISA-S67.04-1994. However, Figure 1 in ISA-S67.04-1994 (for convenience, this figure has been reproduced as Figure 1 in this guide) has been revised to depict region "E," "a region of calibration tolerance." The calibration tolerance uncertainties depicted by region

2 Copies may be obtained from the Instrument Society of America, 67 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC

20779.

2

"E" should be defined and accounted for in the licensees setpoint methodology. A trip setpoint value identified to be outside region "E" regardless of direction requires readjustment to satisfy the setpoint methodology and uncertainties identified in Figure 1 (acceptable as-left condition). It should be noted that this standard does not define "nominal" trip setpoint. The trip setpoint as depicted in Figure 1 is consistent with the term "nominal" trip setpoint as shown about a defined calibration tolerance band.

Figure 1 of the standard provides setpoint relationships for nuclear safety-related setpoints. The figure denotes relative position and not direction, but it should be noted that the uncertainty relationships depicted by Figure 1 do not represent any one particular method (direction, combination, or relationship of uncertainty groupings) for the development of a trip setpoint or allowable value.

Section 4 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the safety significance of various types of setpoints for safety-related instrumentation may differ, and thus a less rigorous setpoint determination method may be applied for certain functional units and limiting conditions of operation (LCOs). A setpoint methodology can include such a graded approach. However, the grading technique chosen by the licensee should be consistent with the standard and should consider applicable uncertainties regardless of the setpoint application. Additionally, the application of the standard, using a "graded" approach, is also appropriate for non-safety system instrumentation for maintaining design limits described in the Technical Specifications. Examples may include instrumentation relied on in emergency operating procedures (EOPS), and for meeting applicable LCOs, and for meeting the variables in Regulatory Guide 1.97, "Instrumentation for Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants To Assess Plant and Environs Conditions During and Following an Accident." 3 The industry consensus standard ANSI/ANS-10.4-1987, "Guidelines for the Verification and Validation of Scientific and Engineering Computer Programs for the Nuclear Industry," provides helpful information on the qualification of setpoint methodology software.

ISA-S67.04-1982 has been used by licensees for setpoint methodology and instrument drift evaluations. ISA-S67.04-1994 provides limited guidance on drift evaluations and uncertainty term development for the evaluation of an instrument surveillance interval. The

3 Single copies of regulatory guides, both active and draft, may be obtained free of charge by writing the Office of Administration, Attn: Reproduction and Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to <DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV>. Copies are also available for inspection or copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room at 2120 L Street NW.,

Washington, DC; the PDRs mailing address is Mail Stop LL-6, Washington, DC 20555; telephone (202)634-3273;

fax (202)634-3343.

3

S a fe ty L im it A n a lytica l L im it N o te : T h is fig u re is in te n d e d to p ro vid e re la tive p o sitio n a n d n o t to im p ly d ire ctio n .

A C

A llo w a b le V a lu e (L S S S )

B

T rip E S e tp o in t (L S S S )

D

N o rm a l A. A llo w a n ce d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 B. A llo w a n ce d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 C. R e g io n w h e re ch a n n e l m a y b e d e te rm in e d in o p e ra b le D. P la n t o p e ra tin g m a rg in E. R e g io n o f ca lib ra tio n to le ra n ce (a cce p ta b le a s le ft co n d itio n )

d e scrib e d in p a ra g ra p h 4 .3 .1 Figure 1. Nuclear Safety-Related Setpoint Relationships

4

(Reproduced from ISA-67.04-1994)

5

staff has generally accepted drift evaluations based on statistical prediction techniques. However, significant variability has been observed in licensees surveillance interval evaluations with regard to drift, setpoint methodology, and completeness. The following concerns were identified during the NRC staff review, but they have been resolved during the development of ISA-S67.04-1994.

+ Limited instrument drift data were included in the licensee setpoint study.

+ Drift data account for all data points from a surveillance calibration (i.e., nine-point check) as independent data, but inadequate justification is provided for this assumption. Drift data points also included interim calibrations.

+ A large number of data points was provided for a limited number of instruments.

+ Flawed outlier analysis resulted in valid data being removed from the data set.

+ Drift dependency on time was assumed to be negligible over the interval selected, and inadequate justification was provided when extrapolating to an extended surveillance interval (e.g., 24 months).

+ Setpoint methodology assumes normal distribution of data when such an assumption was not verified.

+ Instrumentation evaluations (historical, maintenance, drift) were incomplete.

+ Drift projections, including those based on regression analyses, may not account for penalties for uncertainty projection (extended surveillance interval-drift) beyond the time range for the data collected.

+ Instrument application and process or installation variables were not evaluated.

+ The uncertainties assumed for instrumentation, including primary elements, were subsequently not verified or controlled through surveillance testing, qualification, or maintenance programs.

+ The acceptability of pooling generic drift data with plant-specific data or weighing the data according to the source of the data was not justified.

+ All available applicable data were not utilized in the analysis.

Section 4.3 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the limiting safety system setting (LSSS) may be the trip setpoint, an allowable value, or both. For the standard technical specifications, the staff designated the allowable value as the LSSS. In association with the trip setpoint and limiting conditions for operation (LCOs), the LSSS establishes the threshold for protective system action to prevent acceptable limits being exceeded during design basis accidents. The LSSS therefore ensures that automatic protective action will correct the abnormal situation before a safety limit is exceeded. A licensee, with justification, may propose an alternative LSSS based on its particular setpoint methodology or license.

The standard provides for the accounting of measurement and test equipment (MTE) uncertainties, but MTE criteria are not specifically identified within the standard. Criteria XI and XII in Appendix B to

6

10 CFR Part 50 provide requirements for quality regarding testing. Regulatory Guide 1.118, "Periodic Testing of Electric Power and Protection Systems," 3 provides guidance on periodic surveillance testing.

Part II, "Methodologies for the Determination of Setpoints for the Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation," of ISA-S67.04-1994 is not addressed by this regulatory guide.

C. REGULATORY POSITION

Conformance with Part 1 of ISA-S67.04-1994, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related

2 Instrumentation," with the following exceptions and clarifications, provides a method acceptable to the NRC staff for satisfying the NRC's regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are established and maintained within the technical specification limits.

1. Section 4 of ISA-S67.04-1994 specifies the methods, but not the criterion, for combining uncertainties in determining a trip setpoint and its allowable values. The 95/95 tolerance limit is an acceptable criterion for uncertainties. That is, there is a 95% probability that the constructed limits contain

95% of the population of interest for the surveillance interval selected.

2. Sections 7 and 8 of Part 1 of ISA-S67.04-1994 reference several industry codes and standards. If a referenced standard has been incorporated separately into the NRC's regulations, licensees and applicants must comply with that standard as set forth in the regulation. If the referenced standard has been endorsed in a regulatory guide, the standard constitutes a method acceptable to the NRC staff of meeting a regulatory requirement as described in the regulatory guide. If a referenced standard has been neither incorporated into the NRC's regulations nor endorsed in a regulatory guide, licensees and applicants may consider and use the information in the referenced standard if appropriately justified, consistent with current regulatory practice.

3. Section 4.3 of ISA-S67.04-1994 states that the limiting safety system setting (LSSS) may be maintained in technical specifications or appropriate plant procedures. However, 10 CFR 50.36 states that the technical specifications will include items in the categories of safety limits, limiting safety system settings, and limiting control settings. Thus, the LSSS may not be maintained in plant procedures. Rather, the LSSS must be specified as a technical-specification-defined limit in order to satisfy the requirements of

10 CFR 50.36. The LSSS should be developed in accordance with the setpoint methodology set forth in the standard, with the LSSS listed in the technical specifications.

4. ISA-S67.04-1994 provides a discussion on the purpose and application of an allowable value. The allowable value is the limiting value that the trip setpoint can have when tested periodically, beyond which the instrument channel is considered inoperable and corrective action must be taken in accordance with the technical specifications. The allowable value relationship to the setpoint methodology and testing requirements in the technical specifications must be documented.

D. IMPLEMENTATION

The purpose of the section is to provide information to applicants and licensees regarding the NRC

staff's plans for using this regulatory guide.

7

Except in those cases in which an applicant or licensee proposes an acceptable alternative method for complying with specified portions of the NRC's regulations, the methods described in this guide will be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with applications for construction permits, operating licenses, and combined licenses. It will also be used to evaluate submittals from operating reactor licensees who voluntarily propose to initiate system modifications if there is a clear nexus between the proposed modifications and this guidance.

8

VALUE/IMPACT STATEMENT

A draft value/impact statement was published with the draft proposed Revision 3 of this guide when it was published for public comment (DG-1045, October 1996). No changes were necessary, so a separate value/impact statement for the final guide has not been prepared. A copy of the draft value/impact statement is available for inspection or copying for a fee in the NRCs Public Document Room at 2120 L

Street NW., Washington, DC under task DG-1045.

9