Press Release-05-034, NRC Licensing Board Finds in Favor of Company in Pfs Case: Decision Now Goes to Commission: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC NEWS             U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs             Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001      E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPANo. 05-034                                                                                                               February 24, 2005NRC LICENSING BOARD FINDS IN FAVOR OF COMPANY IN PFS CASE;DECISION NOW GOES TO COMMISSIONThe Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent judicial arm of the Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, issued a decision today on the last issue before it on the spent nuclear fuel storage facility proposed for Skull Valley, Utah, by the Private Fuel Storage (PFS) consortium. By a 2-1 vote, the Board ruled in favor of PFS, rejecting the State of Utah's assertions that there is too high a probability that a radiation release could be caused by the accidental crash of one of the 7,000 flights made down Skull Valley every year by F-16 single-engine jets from Hill Air Force Base. With the Licensing Board's role now completed, the determination whether to issue therequested license now goes to the five Commissioners who head the NRC, who will also hear any appeals. The PFS facility would be located on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of GoshuteIndians, about 50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The proposed above-ground facility, whose principal opponent is the State of Utah, is intended for temporary storage of the waste fuel from U.S.
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs       Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001      E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No. 05-034                                                                                 February 24, 2005 NRC LICENSING BOARD FINDS IN FAVOR OF COMPANY IN PFS CASE; DECISION NOW GOES TO COMMISSION The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent judicial arm of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, issued a decision today on the last issue before it on the spent nuclear fuel storage facility proposed for Skull Valley, Utah, by the Private Fuel Storage (PFS) consortium. By a 2-1 vote, the Board ruled in favor of PFS, rejecting the State of Utahs assertions that there is too high a probability that a radiation release could be caused by the accidental crash of one of the 7,000 flights made down Skull Valley every year by F-16 single-engine jets from Hill Air Force Base.
nuclear power plants. During a formal 16-day trial which ended in mid-September 2004, the Licensing Board hadheard expert witnesses and received documentary evidence from the Applicant PFS, the NRC Staff, and the State of Utah on (1) the strength of the steel and concrete outer casks and the stainless steel inner canisters holding the spent fuel and (2) the speeds and angles at which F-16s have previously crashed around the world. The Board majority concluded that the probability of a crash at a speed and angle sufficient to breach one of the stainless steel canisters holding spent nuclear fuel was less than one-in-a-million per year. Under the NRC's standards, a facility like PFS does not have to be designed against such an unlikely accident. Nearly two years ago, the Licensing Board had upheld the State's initial argument, blockingissuance of the PFS license, by finding that the probability of an accidental F-16 crash onto theproposed site was too high unless it could be shown that such a crash would have no adverse radiological consequences. The Applicant's appeal of that decision to the Commission was held in abeyance pending the second phase of the F-16 crash inquiry.
With the Licensing Boards role now completed, the determination whether to issue the requested license now goes to the five Commissioners who head the NRC, who will also hear any appeals.
Earlier today, the Licensing Board also issued in the PFS matter an unrelated decision decliningto consider a new contention the State had recently filed, after the aircraft hearing had been closed, based on remarks assertedly made by an official of the U.S. Department of Energy concerning the ultimate fate of spent fuel stored at the proposed PFS facility. The Board determined that at this late stage, and in light of DOE documents that contradicted the remarks, it would not reopen the hearing record to adjudicate the matter, which it indicated was instead worthy of attention by the Commission. The full reasoning justifying the Licensing Board's F-16 accident decision cannot be releasedbecause it contains non-publicly-available (Safeguards Information) facts and analyses concerning the impact of plane crashes on concrete and steel objects. For that same reason, the evidentiary hearing had been closed to the public. The Board did prepare a version of its opinion that sets forth only a general summary of thoseaspects of its reasoning, and that version is being made publicly available. A copy of that 68-page version may be obtained from the NRC's web site at http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/adjudicatory/pfs-aircraft05.pdf
The PFS facility would be located on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, about 50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The proposed above-ground facility, whose principal opponent is the State of Utah, is intended for temporary storage of the waste fuel from U.S.
.###}}
nuclear power plants.
During a formal 16-day trial which ended in mid-September 2004, the Licensing Board had heard expert witnesses and received documentary evidence from the Applicant PFS, the NRC Staff, and the State of Utah on (1) the strength of the steel and concrete outer casks and the stainless steel inner canisters holding the spent fuel and (2) the speeds and angles at which F-16s have previously crashed around the world. The Board majority concluded that the probability of a crash at a speed and angle sufficient to breach one of the stainless steel canisters holding spent nuclear fuel was less than one-in-a-million per year. Under the NRCs standards, a facility like PFS does not have to be designed against such an unlikely accident.
Nearly two years ago, the Licensing Board had upheld the States initial argument, blocking issuance of the PFS license, by finding that the probability of an accidental F-16 crash onto the proposed site was too high unless it could be shown that such a crash would have no adverse radiological consequences. The Applicants appeal of that decision to the Commission was held in abeyance pending the second phase of the F-16 crash inquiry.
 
Earlier today, the Licensing Board also issued in the PFS matter an unrelated decision declining to consider a new contention the State had recently filed, after the aircraft hearing had been closed, based on remarks assertedly made by an official of the U.S. Department of Energy concerning the ultimate fate of spent fuel stored at the proposed PFS facility. The Board determined that at this late stage, and in light of DOE documents that contradicted the remarks, it would not reopen the hearing record to adjudicate the matter, which it indicated was instead worthy of attention by the Commission.
The full reasoning justifying the Licensing Boards F-16 accident decision cannot be released because it contains non-publicly-available (Safeguards Information) facts and analyses concerning the impact of plane crashes on concrete and steel objects. For that same reason, the evidentiary hearing had been closed to the public.
The Board did prepare a version of its opinion that sets forth only a general summary of those aspects of its reasoning, and that version is being made publicly available. A copy of that 68-page version may be obtained from the NRCs web site at http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/adjudicatory/pfs-aircraft05.pdf.
                                                    ###}}

Revision as of 00:39, 24 November 2019

Press Release-05-034: NRC Licensing Board Finds in Favor of Company in Pfs Case: Decision Now Goes to Commission
ML050550358
Person / Time
Site: 07200022
Issue date: 02/24/2005
From:
Office of Public Affairs
To:
References
Press Release-05-034
Download: ML050550358 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs Telephone: 301/415-8200 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 E-mail: opa@nrc.gov Web Site: http://www.nrc.gov/OPA No.05-034 February 24, 2005 NRC LICENSING BOARD FINDS IN FAVOR OF COMPANY IN PFS CASE; DECISION NOW GOES TO COMMISSION The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, an independent judicial arm of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, issued a decision today on the last issue before it on the spent nuclear fuel storage facility proposed for Skull Valley, Utah, by the Private Fuel Storage (PFS) consortium. By a 2-1 vote, the Board ruled in favor of PFS, rejecting the State of Utahs assertions that there is too high a probability that a radiation release could be caused by the accidental crash of one of the 7,000 flights made down Skull Valley every year by F-16 single-engine jets from Hill Air Force Base.

With the Licensing Boards role now completed, the determination whether to issue the requested license now goes to the five Commissioners who head the NRC, who will also hear any appeals.

The PFS facility would be located on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, about 50 miles southwest of Salt Lake City. The proposed above-ground facility, whose principal opponent is the State of Utah, is intended for temporary storage of the waste fuel from U.S.

nuclear power plants.

During a formal 16-day trial which ended in mid-September 2004, the Licensing Board had heard expert witnesses and received documentary evidence from the Applicant PFS, the NRC Staff, and the State of Utah on (1) the strength of the steel and concrete outer casks and the stainless steel inner canisters holding the spent fuel and (2) the speeds and angles at which F-16s have previously crashed around the world. The Board majority concluded that the probability of a crash at a speed and angle sufficient to breach one of the stainless steel canisters holding spent nuclear fuel was less than one-in-a-million per year. Under the NRCs standards, a facility like PFS does not have to be designed against such an unlikely accident.

Nearly two years ago, the Licensing Board had upheld the States initial argument, blocking issuance of the PFS license, by finding that the probability of an accidental F-16 crash onto the proposed site was too high unless it could be shown that such a crash would have no adverse radiological consequences. The Applicants appeal of that decision to the Commission was held in abeyance pending the second phase of the F-16 crash inquiry.

Earlier today, the Licensing Board also issued in the PFS matter an unrelated decision declining to consider a new contention the State had recently filed, after the aircraft hearing had been closed, based on remarks assertedly made by an official of the U.S. Department of Energy concerning the ultimate fate of spent fuel stored at the proposed PFS facility. The Board determined that at this late stage, and in light of DOE documents that contradicted the remarks, it would not reopen the hearing record to adjudicate the matter, which it indicated was instead worthy of attention by the Commission.

The full reasoning justifying the Licensing Boards F-16 accident decision cannot be released because it contains non-publicly-available (Safeguards Information) facts and analyses concerning the impact of plane crashes on concrete and steel objects. For that same reason, the evidentiary hearing had been closed to the public.

The Board did prepare a version of its opinion that sets forth only a general summary of those aspects of its reasoning, and that version is being made publicly available. A copy of that 68-page version may be obtained from the NRCs web site at http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/regulatory/adjudicatory/pfs-aircraft05.pdf.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=Press_Release-05-034,_NRC_Licensing_Board_Finds_in_Favor_of_Company_in_Pfs_Case:_Decision_Now_Goes_to_Commission&oldid=2198767"