ML060610182: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:March 2, 2006Florida Power and Light CompanyATTN:Mr. J. A. Stall, Senior Vice PresidentNuclear and Chief Nuclear OfficerP. O. Box 14000
{{#Wiki_filter:March 2, 2006
Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420SUBJECT:ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000335/2006001 AND 05000389/2006001)Dear Mr. Stall:
Florida Power and Light Company
On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of St. Lucie NuclearPlant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and
ATTN: Mr. J. A. Stall, Senior Vice President
inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005. The purpose of
        Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer
P. O. Box 14000
Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
SUBJECT:         ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT
                  (NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000335/2006001 AND 05000389/2006001)
Dear Mr. Stall:
On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of St. Lucie Nuclear
Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and
inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005. The purpose of
this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and
this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and
our plans for future inspections at your facility.This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protectioninformation. A separate letter designated and marked as "Official Use Only - Security-Related
our plans for future inspections at your facility.
Information," will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.Overall, St. Lucie Units 1 and 2
This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protection
operated in a manner that preserved public health and safetyand fully met all cornerstone objectives. Plant performance for the most recent quarter, as wellas for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, was within the Licensee Re sponsecolumn of the NRC's Action Matrix. We base this conclusion on the fact that all inspection
information. A separate letter designated and marked as Official Use Only - Security-Related
Information, will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.
Overall, St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety
and fully met all cornerstone objectives. Plant performance for the most recent quarter, as well
as for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, was within the Licensee Response
column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We base this conclusion on the fact that all inspection
findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated
findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated
performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan toconduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at your facility. We also plan toconduct a non-ROP inspection involving a pressurized water reactor (PWR) containment sump
performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to
blockage temporary instruction (TI).The enclosed inspection plan details the inspections, less those related to physical protection,scheduled through September 30, 2007. The inspection plan is provided to allow for the  
conduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at your facility. We also plan to
resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues well in advance ofinspector arrival onsite. Routine resident inspections are not listed due to their ongoing and
conduct a non-ROP inspection involving a pressurized water reactor (PWR) containment sump
continuous nature. The inspections in the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentativeand may be revised at the mid-cycle review. Although our intent is to maintain the enclosedinspection plan fixed for the first nine months, a need may arise to conduct one or more
blockage temporary instruction (TI).
The enclosed inspection plan details the inspections, less those related to physical protection,
scheduled through September 30, 2007. The inspection plan is provided to allow for the
resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues well in advance of
inspector arrival onsite. Routine resident inspections are not listed due to their ongoing and
continuous nature. The inspections in the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative
and may be revised at the mid-cycle review. Although our intent is to maintain the enclosed
inspection plan fixed for the first nine months, a need may arise to conduct one or more
unanticipated inspections prior to issuing an updated inspection plan with the 2006 assessment
unanticipated inspections prior to issuing an updated inspection plan with the 2006 assessment
cycle mid-cycle letter. If an inspection of this type becomes necessary, we will notify you of the
cycle mid-cycle letter. If an inspection of this type becomes necessary, we will notify you of the
planned inspection dates as soon as possible to resolve as much as we can, any scheduling
planned inspection dates as soon as possible to resolve as much as we can, any scheduling
and personnel availability conflicts you may have.
and personnel availability conflicts you may have.
FP&L2In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and itsenclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC PublicDocument Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC'sdocument system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at
 
FP&L                                            2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's
document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
If circumstances arise which cause us to change this inspection plan, we will contact you to
If circumstances arise which cause us to change this inspection plan, we will contact you todiscuss the change as soon as possible. Please contact me at 404-562-4560 with any
discuss the change as soon as possible. Please contact me at 404-562-4560 with any
questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.Sincerely,/RA/Joel T. Munday, ChiefReactor Projects Branch 3
questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.
Division of Reactor ProjectsDocket No(s). 50-335, 50-389License No(s). DPR-67, NPF-16Enclosure: St. Lucie Inspection/Activity Plan  
                                            Sincerely,
FP&L3cc w/encl:.William Jefferson, Jr.
                                            /RA/
Site Vice President
                                            Joel T. Munday, Chief
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant
                                            Reactor Projects Branch 3
                                            Division of Reactor Projects
Docket No(s). 50-335, 50-389
License No(s). DPR-67, NPF-16
Enclosure: St. Lucie Inspection/Activity Plan
 
FP&L                                3
cc w/encl:.
William Jefferson, Jr.
Site Vice President                   J. Kammel
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant                Radiological Emergency
Florida Power & Light Company          Planning Administrator
Electronic Mail Distribution          Department of Public Safety
                                      Electronic Mail Distribution
G. L. Johnston
Plant General Manager                  Douglas Anderson
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant                County Administrator
Electronic Mail Distribution          St. Lucie County
                                      2300 Virginia Avenue
Terry L. Patterson                    Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Licensing Manager
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant               Distribution w/encl: (See page 4)
Electronic Mail Distribution
Mark Warner, Vice President
Nuclear Operations Support
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Rajiv S. Kundalkar
Vice President - Nuclear Engineering
Florida Power & Light Company
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail DistributionG. L. JohnstonPlant General Manager
Electronic Mail Distribution
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant
M. S. Ross, Managing Attorney
Electronic Mail DistributionTerry L. PattersonLicensing Manager
St. Lucie Nuclear Plant
Electronic Mail DistributionMark Warner, Vice PresidentNuclear Operations Support
Florida Power & Light Company
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail DistributionRajiv S. KundalkarVice President - Nuclear Engineering
Electronic Mail Distribution
Marjan Mashhadi, Senior Attorney
Florida Power & Light Company
Florida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail DistributionM. S. Ross, Managing AttorneyFlorida Power & Light Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Electronic Mail DistributionMarjan Mashhadi, Senior AttorneyFlorida Power & Light Company
William A. Passetti
Electronic Mail DistributionWilliam A. PassettiBureau of Radiation Control
Bureau of Radiation Control
Department of Health
Department of Health
Electronic Mail DistributionCraig Fugate, DirectorDivision of Emergency Preparedness
Electronic Mail Distribution
Craig Fugate, Director
Division of Emergency Preparedness
Department of Community Affairs
Department of Community Affairs
Electronic Mail DistributionJ. KammelRadiological Emergency
Electronic Mail Distribution
  Planning Administrator
Department of Public Safety
Electronic Mail DistributionDouglas AndersonCounty Administrator
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft. Pierce, FL  34982Distribution w/encl: (See page 4)




_________________________OFFICERII:DRPSIGNATUREJTMNAMEJMunday:rcmDATE03/01/063/     /20063/     /20063/     /20063/     /20063/      /20063/      /2006
_________________________
E-MAIL COPY?    YESNO     YESNO     YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO
OFFICE            RII:DRP
SIGNATURE          JTM
NAME              JMunday:rcm
DATE                    03/01/06    3/ /2006    3/ /2006      3/ /2006    3/   /2006  3/ /2006     3/ /2006
E-MAIL COPY?         YES      NO  YES    NO   YES    NO    YES     NO    YES     NO  YES    NO    YES    NO
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:40, 23 November 2019

Annual Assessment Letter - St. Lucie Nuclear Plant (NRC Inspection Report 05000335/2006001 and 05000389/2006001)
ML060610182
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/2006
From: Joel Munday
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB3
To: Stall J
Florida Power & Light Co
Shared Package
ML060610175 List:
References
IR-06-001
Download: ML060610182 (4)


See also: IR 05000335/2006001

Text

March 2, 2006

Florida Power and Light Company

ATTN: Mr. J. A. Stall, Senior Vice President

Nuclear and Chief Nuclear Officer

P. O. Box 14000

Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420

SUBJECT: ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - ST. LUCIE NUCLEAR PLANT

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000335/2006001 AND 05000389/2006001)

Dear Mr. Stall:

On February 8, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of St. Lucie Nuclear

Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent quarter and

inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005. The purpose of

this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and

our plans for future inspections at your facility.

This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protection

information. A separate letter designated and marked as Official Use Only - Security-Related

Information, will include the physical protection review and resultant inspection plan.

Overall, St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety

and fully met all cornerstone objectives. Plant performance for the most recent quarter, as well

as for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, was within the Licensee Response

column of the NRCs Action Matrix. We base this conclusion on the fact that all inspection

findings were classified as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicated

performance at a level requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to

conduct reactor oversight process (ROP) baseline inspections at your facility. We also plan to

conduct a non-ROP inspection involving a pressurized water reactor (PWR) containment sump

blockage temporary instruction (TI).

The enclosed inspection plan details the inspections, less those related to physical protection,

scheduled through September 30, 2007. The inspection plan is provided to allow for the

resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues well in advance of

inspector arrival onsite. Routine resident inspections are not listed due to their ongoing and

continuous nature. The inspections in the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative

and may be revised at the mid-cycle review. Although our intent is to maintain the enclosed

inspection plan fixed for the first nine months, a need may arise to conduct one or more

unanticipated inspections prior to issuing an updated inspection plan with the 2006 assessment

cycle mid-cycle letter. If an inspection of this type becomes necessary, we will notify you of the

planned inspection dates as soon as possible to resolve as much as we can, any scheduling

and personnel availability conflicts you may have.

FP&L 2

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public

Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's

document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

If circumstances arise which cause us to change this inspection plan, we will contact you to

discuss the change as soon as possible. Please contact me at 404-562-4560 with any

questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Joel T. Munday, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 3

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket No(s). 50-335, 50-389

License No(s). DPR-67, NPF-16

Enclosure: St. Lucie Inspection/Activity Plan

FP&L 3

cc w/encl:.

William Jefferson, Jr.

Site Vice President J. Kammel

St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Radiological Emergency

Florida Power & Light Company Planning Administrator

Electronic Mail Distribution Department of Public Safety

Electronic Mail Distribution

G. L. Johnston

Plant General Manager Douglas Anderson

St. Lucie Nuclear Plant County Administrator

Electronic Mail Distribution St. Lucie County

2300 Virginia Avenue

Terry L. Patterson Ft. Pierce, FL 34982

Licensing Manager

St. Lucie Nuclear Plant Distribution w/encl: (See page 4)

Electronic Mail Distribution

Mark Warner, Vice President

Nuclear Operations Support

Florida Power & Light Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

Rajiv S. Kundalkar

Vice President - Nuclear Engineering

Florida Power & Light Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

M. S. Ross, Managing Attorney

Florida Power & Light Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

Marjan Mashhadi, Senior Attorney

Florida Power & Light Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

William A. Passetti

Bureau of Radiation Control

Department of Health

Electronic Mail Distribution

Craig Fugate, Director

Division of Emergency Preparedness

Department of Community Affairs

Electronic Mail Distribution

_________________________

OFFICE RII:DRP

SIGNATURE JTM

NAME JMunday:rcm

DATE 03/01/06 3/ /2006 3/ /2006 3/ /2006 3/ /2006 3/ /2006 3/ /2006

E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO