ML061660475: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:June 28, 2006Gerry P. Little, DirectorOcean County Board of Chosen Freeholders P.O. Box 2191, Administration Bldg.
{{#Wiki_filter:June 28, 2006 Gerry P. Little, Director Ocean County Board of Chosen Freeholders P.O. Box 2191, Administration Bldg.
Toms River, NJ 08754-2191
Toms River, NJ 08754-2191


Line 25: Line 25:
==Dear Mr. Little:==
==Dear Mr. Little:==


I am responding on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to your letters ofMay 7 and 17, 2006, concerning the airspace over Oyster Creek Generating Station.Before I discuss the NRC's approach to dealing with airborne threats, I must point out that theNRC has no authority or jurisdiction regarding the issuance of flight restrictions. The authorityto issue flight restrictions lies with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The NRC provides information on NRC-licensed facilities to the FAA, Department of Defense (DoD),Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal entities involved in the protection of the Nation's infrastructure, but the NRC does not have the authority to controlthe use of the Nation's airspace.The NRC supports the position that the Nation's resources which are dedicated to protectingagainst terrorist airborne attacks should be primarily directed toward enhancing security atairports and within commercial airplanes in flight. This approach provides the best opportunity for early awareness of a potential threat, thus increasing the response time for Federal, State and local authorities, and personnel at sensitive sites.The NRC has taken steps to augment the aforementioned strategy. In response to the eventsof September 11, 2001, the NRC has been in regular communication with the FAA and DoD. The protection of airspace over some NRC-licensed sites has been discussed. OnSeptember 23, 2001, representatives from the FAA, DoD, and NRC met to discuss aviationsecurity and determined that a Notice To Airmen (NOTAM), issued by the FAA, was the appropriate vehicle to protect the airspace above sensitive sites, including nuclear power plants.
I am responding on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to your letters of May 7 and 17, 2006, concerning the airspace over Oyster Creek Generating Station.
This NOTAM has been updated on several occasions, and its current version, 4/0811, issued on October 8, 2004, strongly advises pilots "to avoid the airspace above, or in proximity to such sites as power plants (nuclear, hydroelectric, or coal), dams, refineries, industrial complexes, military facilities and other similar facilities. Pilots should not circle as to loiter in the vicinity overthese types of facilities.This notice is still in effect.The NRC also issued a Safeguards Advisory containing an imminent airborne attack protocolfor nuclear power reactor licensees. The mitigating measures outlined in this Advisory cover the spectrum of potential airborne threats and put nuclear power reactor sites in the safest possible configuration prior to an attack.
Before I discuss the NRCs approach to dealing with airborne threats, I must point out that the NRC has no authority or jurisdiction regarding the issuance of flight restrictions. The authority to issue flight restrictions lies with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The NRC provides information on NRC-licensed facilities to the FAA, Department of Defense (DoD),
G. Little- 2 -I appreciate your interest in the NRC's efforts to ensure the most effective measures forcountering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.
Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal entities involved in the protection of the Nations infrastructure, but the NRC does not have the authority to control the use of the Nations airspace.
Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM
The NRC supports the position that the Nations resources which are dedicated to protecting against terrorist airborne attacks should be primarily directed toward enhancing security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight. This approach provides the best opportunity for early awareness of a potential threat, thus increasing the response time for Federal, State and local authorities, and personnel at sensitive sites.
The NRC has taken steps to augment the aforementioned strategy. In response to the events of September 11, 2001, the NRC has been in regular communication with the FAA and DoD.
The protection of airspace over some NRC-licensed sites has been discussed. On September 23, 2001, representatives from the FAA, DoD, and NRC met to discuss aviation security and determined that a Notice To Airmen (NOTAM), issued by the FAA, was the appropriate vehicle to protect the airspace above sensitive sites, including nuclear power plants.
This NOTAM has been updated on several occasions, and its current version, 4/0811, issued on October 8, 2004, strongly advises pilots to avoid the airspace above, or in proximity to such sites as power plants (nuclear, hydroelectric, or coal), dams, refineries, industrial complexes, military facilities and other similar facilities. Pilots should not circle as to loiter in the vicinity over these types of facilities. This notice is still in effect.
The NRC also issued a Safeguards Advisory containing an imminent airborne attack protocol for nuclear power reactor licensees. The mitigating measures outlined in this Advisory cover the spectrum of potential airborne threats and put nuclear power reactor sites in the safest possible configuration prior to an attack.


4/0811, and the NRC's imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of riskto the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the "comfort level" to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request anairspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC willcoordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.Sincerely,/RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/Roy P. Zimmerman, DirectorOffice of Nuclear Security and Incident Response G. Little- 2 -I appreciate your interest in the NRC's efforts to ensure the most effective measures forcountering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.
G. Little                                      I appreciate your interest in the NRCs efforts to ensure the most effective measures for countering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.
Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM
Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM 4/0811, and the NRCs imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of risk to the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the comfort level to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request an airspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC will coordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
                                              /RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/
Roy P. Zimmerman, Director Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response


4/0811, and the NRC's imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of riskto the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the "comfort level" to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request anairspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC willcoordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.Sincerely,/RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/Roy P. Zimmerman, DirectorOffice of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseDISTRIBUTION
G. Little                                          I appreciate your interest in the NRCs efforts to ensure the most effective measures for countering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.
LReyes MVirigilio WKane JSilber WDean Cyr/BurnsJ DyerSCollins, RI RidsNsirOd RidsEdoMailCenter, G20060508 EDO Mailroom (G20060508/SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)
Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM 4/0811, and the NRCs imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of risk to the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the comfort level to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request an airspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC will coordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
                                                  /RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/
Roy P. Zimmerman, Director Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response DISTRIBUTION:
LReyes         MVirigilio       WKane           JSilber       WDean           Cyr/Burns J Dyer          SCollins, RI RidsNsirOd RidsEdoMailCenter, G20060508 EDO Mailroom (G20060508/SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)
SECY (SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)
SECY (SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)
LCubellis, SRB AMadison, SRB VOrdaz, DDRSR DSP R/FACCESSION NO.: PKG - ML061700060 LTR - ML061660475 TICKET ML061700067TEMPLATE NO.: NSIR-002* See Previous Concurrence Non-Public Public Sensitive Non-SensitiveOFFICENSIR/SPLBBC:NSIR/SPLBDD:NSIR/DDRSRD:NSIR/DSPNRR*NAMELCubellis/sabAMadisonVOrdazGTracyJDyer GHolahan /f/DATE6/19 /066/ 19 /066/ 20 /066/21 /066/27/06OFFICEOGC*D:NSIR*NAMEJGoldberg NLORZimmermanRWBorchardt /f/DATE6/22/0606/28/06OFFICIAL FILE COPY Log # 4271Kelly Riner (Office LA ) reviewed document on 6/19/06 for formatting purpose}}
LCubellis, SRB AMadison, SRB VOrdaz, DDRSR DSP R/F ACCESSION NO.: PKG - ML061700060                 LTR - ML061660475               TICKET ML061700067 TEMPLATE NO.: NSIR-002
* See Previous Concurrence 9 Non-Public                     º Public                 9 Sensitive           º Non-Sensitive OFFICE    NSIR/SPLB        BC:NSIR/SPLB        DD:NSIR/DDRSR        D:NSIR/DSP            NRR*
NAME      LCubellis/sab      AMadison              VOrdaz            GTracy        JDyer GHolahan /f/
DATE        6/19 /06          6/ 19 /06            6/ 20 /06          6/21 /06          6/27/06 OFFICE          OGC*           D:NSIR*
NAME      JGoldberg NLO      RZimmerman RWBorchardt /f/
DATE          6/22/06          06/28/06 OFFICIAL FILE COPY                             Log # 4271 Kelly Riner (Office LA ) reviewed document on 6/19/06 for formatting purpose}}

Revision as of 17:31, 23 November 2019

2006/06/28-G20060508/Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Airspace- EDATS: SECY-2006-0094 (Ltr to Gerry P. Little)
ML061660475
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 06/28/2006
From: Zimmerman R
Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
To: Little G
Ocean County, NJ, Board of Chosen Freeholders
Cubellis L NSIR/DSP 301-415-7114
Shared Package
ML061700060 List:
References
%dam200612, G20060508, SECY-2006-0094
Download: ML061660475 (3)


Text

June 28, 2006 Gerry P. Little, Director Ocean County Board of Chosen Freeholders P.O. Box 2191, Administration Bldg.

Toms River, NJ 08754-2191

SUBJECT:

RESTRICTED AIRSPACE OVER OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION

Dear Mr. Little:

I am responding on behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to your letters of May 7 and 17, 2006, concerning the airspace over Oyster Creek Generating Station.

Before I discuss the NRCs approach to dealing with airborne threats, I must point out that the NRC has no authority or jurisdiction regarding the issuance of flight restrictions. The authority to issue flight restrictions lies with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The NRC provides information on NRC-licensed facilities to the FAA, Department of Defense (DoD),

Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, and other Federal entities involved in the protection of the Nations infrastructure, but the NRC does not have the authority to control the use of the Nations airspace.

The NRC supports the position that the Nations resources which are dedicated to protecting against terrorist airborne attacks should be primarily directed toward enhancing security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight. This approach provides the best opportunity for early awareness of a potential threat, thus increasing the response time for Federal, State and local authorities, and personnel at sensitive sites.

The NRC has taken steps to augment the aforementioned strategy. In response to the events of September 11, 2001, the NRC has been in regular communication with the FAA and DoD.

The protection of airspace over some NRC-licensed sites has been discussed. On September 23, 2001, representatives from the FAA, DoD, and NRC met to discuss aviation security and determined that a Notice To Airmen (NOTAM), issued by the FAA, was the appropriate vehicle to protect the airspace above sensitive sites, including nuclear power plants.

This NOTAM has been updated on several occasions, and its current version, 4/0811, issued on October 8, 2004, strongly advises pilots to avoid the airspace above, or in proximity to such sites as power plants (nuclear, hydroelectric, or coal), dams, refineries, industrial complexes, military facilities and other similar facilities. Pilots should not circle as to loiter in the vicinity over these types of facilities. This notice is still in effect.

The NRC also issued a Safeguards Advisory containing an imminent airborne attack protocol for nuclear power reactor licensees. The mitigating measures outlined in this Advisory cover the spectrum of potential airborne threats and put nuclear power reactor sites in the safest possible configuration prior to an attack.

G. Little I appreciate your interest in the NRCs efforts to ensure the most effective measures for countering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.

Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM 4/0811, and the NRCs imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of risk to the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the comfort level to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request an airspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC will coordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

/RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/

Roy P. Zimmerman, Director Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response

G. Little I appreciate your interest in the NRCs efforts to ensure the most effective measures for countering potential airborne threats to nuclear power reactor sites are being employed.

Collectively, enhanced security at airports and within commercial airplanes in flight, NOTAM 4/0811, and the NRCs imminent airborne attack protocol result in the greatest reduction of risk to the people of the United States and should provide those who reside near nuclear power reactors the comfort level to which you allude. Although the NRC has no plans to request an airspace restriction zone over Oyster Creek Generating Station at this time, the NRC will coordinate an appropriate response with other Federal agencies should additional restrictions be necessary as a result of changing or more specific threats. If you have further questions, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

/RA by R. W. Borchardt Acting For/

Roy P. Zimmerman, Director Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response DISTRIBUTION:

LReyes MVirigilio WKane JSilber WDean Cyr/Burns J Dyer SCollins, RI RidsNsirOd RidsEdoMailCenter, G20060508 EDO Mailroom (G20060508/SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)

SECY (SECY-2006-0094) Hardcopy (MS16C1)

LCubellis, SRB AMadison, SRB VOrdaz, DDRSR DSP R/F ACCESSION NO.: PKG - ML061700060 LTR - ML061660475 TICKET ML061700067 TEMPLATE NO.: NSIR-002

  • See Previous Concurrence 9 Non-Public º Public 9 Sensitive º Non-Sensitive OFFICE NSIR/SPLB BC:NSIR/SPLB DD:NSIR/DDRSR D:NSIR/DSP NRR*

NAME LCubellis/sab AMadison VOrdaz GTracy JDyer GHolahan /f/

DATE 6/19 /06 6/ 19 /06 6/ 20 /06 6/21 /06 6/27/06 OFFICE OGC* D:NSIR*

NAME JGoldberg NLO RZimmerman RWBorchardt /f/

DATE 6/22/06 06/28/06 OFFICIAL FILE COPY Log # 4271 Kelly Riner (Office LA ) reviewed document on 6/19/06 for formatting purpose