ML062130184: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data DDIAN.: "'04-13-f1 Disputed: Number: n4 Related Cases: Docket No.: 05000298 Request Date: 5 Region: IV CaseType:  
{{#Wiki_filter:SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data                                                           Disputed:                    Related Cases:
,.. Rx"e Small Entity. [] No f1Yes Licensee:
DDIAN.:
Nebrask Publi Power Di~tct -act/Cy.ooper License No.: DPR-46 Last Day of Insp.: 7=2204 Insp. Rpt No.: I R-Q4!Q4 _ Keywords:  
                            "'04-13-f1               Number: n4                   Docket No.: 05000298 Request Date: V* 5               Region: IV           CaseType: ,..         Rx"e                   Small Entity. [] No         f1Yes Licensee:     Nebrask Publi Power Di~tct             -act/Cy.ooper License No.:               DPR-46                               Last Day of Insp.: 7=2204 Insp. Rpt No.:       I R-Q4!Q4         _     Keywords:                     --                                                                 ES:   drs Facts         Falluretpo perrbs re he serv*ce wa~terto s rvomialoobflguratbn f1bwng Foulnejie                       t~hnarpice     ýtat~he Icens-ee (EATS):       didnoreaibiagh the gland waterfk q service water m~aintenance. The faikare to reabn' th6 gland w~ater was attributed to indequ~ate instrctnsi. The adqteinstructions led to the cross connection of gland watr resulting ina bs-'f servie water redundiancy.
--ES: drs Facts Falluretpo perrbs re he serv*ce wa~terto s rvomialoobflguratbn f1bwng Foulnejie t~hnarpice  
Discussion (ifrequired):         One green fWnding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status folowing maintenance. DuringrbD final significance determination, the SERP members did not reach consensus on the final risk               oh CC-x 5-SDP                       El1No       nXYes Assessment         x                 [jWhilte           [Ylow                                                 NOV             Yes     ]No Wrongdoing [1No             X             Yes O Ref. Date                           OI Rpt No.::                                       01.Rpt Date.
ýtat ~he Icens-ee (EATS): didno reaibiagh the gland waterfk q service water m~aintenance.
DOJ Referral?           D   No   flYes         Ref. Date                         Action Date                           D.ecline             Accept Additional 01 Status             01 Investigating 01]                                   E--01 needs to be notified         D OMOE dispute memo needed
The faikare to reabn' th6 gland w~ater was attributed to indequ~ate instrctnsi.
                              =1]Additional cordination needed           ElAwating DOJ                     j]Needs coordination with DOJ Escalated. Action Consequence:               [IlActual   [   Potental   []Reg. Impact               Willfulness Prior Esc. Action?         El1 No     M Yes           EA.                                 Date:
The adqteinstructions led to the cross connection of gland watr resulting ina bs-'f servie water redundiancy.
IDCredit?                 ENo         E]Yes           MTBD                                         SL:E CA Credit?                 ElNo       ElYes           Z]TBD                                   Supp:l CP?           El-No CP El Base       E-Double Base         ['M other:
Discussion (if required):
Discretion or Order?                           [   No       r-'Yes       Explain:
One green fWnding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status folowing maintenance.
Future Action Conference?               5W   No     EY-es       []   Open         El Cbsed           Additional Action?       0l No VMolation         Re-panel   ED PEC~     Letter       Choice Letter     H Choice Call         E   St.IV NOV         B   Re-caucus UJRegion Issue Esc. Action       U Full Package Review by HO U DEDR Review                       commission C               U Disagreement               NCV OtterAction?     One green finding and violation of Criterion V A. Howell, S. Schwind, K.. Fuller, W. Walker, T. Vegel, D.Loveless, G. Shear, Participants:      Region          D.Chamberlain, G. Sanborn, K Kennedy, D. Loveless, S. Cochrum OE             J. Luehman, G. Morell, C. Nolan, D. Starkey                 OGC/OI komiawionmOh rGcod wa de~
DuringrbD final significance determination, the SERP members did not reach consensus on the final risk oh CC-x 5-SDP El1No nXYes Assessment x [jWhilte [Ylow NOV Yes ]No Wrongdoing
4 -     49Z
[1No X Yes O Ref. Date OI Rpt No.:: 01.Rpt Date.DOJ Referral?
 
D No flYes Ref. Date Action Date D.ecline Accept Additional 01 Status 01] 01 Investigating E--01 needs to be notified D OMOE dispute memo needed=1]Additional cordination needed ElAwating DOJ j]Needs coordination with DOJ Escalated.
000   NOT                   IC             S             HOUT         ROV         H CT,0 R. Franovich, R. Giibbs, D. Coe, M.Tshilftz, M. Reinhart, S. Richards, S. Meng Wong, B. Palla, Program       S. Lavie, M.Honcharik, See-Meng Wong, Office         A.. E-Bassioni, R.Bywater, S.Lavie                   Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned:
Action Consequence:
Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/
[IlActual
Date: 02/09/05}}
[ Potental []Reg. Impact Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? El1 No M Yes EA. Date: ID Credit? ENo E]Yes MTBD SL:E CA Credit? ElNo ElYes Z]TBD Supp:l CP? El-No CP El Base E-Double Base ['M other: Discretion or Order? [ No r-'Yes Explain: Future Action Conference?
5W No EY-es [] Open El Cbsed Additional Action? 0l No VMolation Re-panel ED PEC~ Letter Choice Letter H Choice Call E St.IV NOV B Re-caucus UJRegion Issue Esc. Action U Full Package Review by HO U DEDR Review C commission U Disagreement NCV OtterAction?
One green finding and violation of Criterion V A. Howell, S. Schwind, K.. Fuller, W. Walker, T. Vegel, D. Loveless, G. Shear, D. Chamberlain, G. Sanborn, K Kennedy, D. Loveless, S. Cochrum Participants:
Region OE J. Luehman, G. Morell, C. Nolan, D. Starkey OGC/OI komiawion m Oh rGcod wa de~4 -49Z 000 NOT IC S HOUT ROV H CT,0 R. Franovich, R. Giibbs, D. Coe, M. Tshilftz, M. Reinhart, S. Richards, S. Meng Wong, B. Palla, Program S. Lavie, M. Honcharik, See-Meng Wong, Office A.. E-Bassioni, R.Bywater, S.Lavie Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned: Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/Date: 02/09/05}}

Revision as of 15:42, 23 November 2019

EA-04-131-4, Cooper
ML062130184
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/2005
From: Luehman J, Morell G, Nolan M, Starkey R
NRC/OE
To:
References
EA-04-131, FOIA/PA-2006-0007, IR-04-014 EA-04-131-4
Download: ML062130184 (2)
v • d • e


Text

SDP/EA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM Case Data Disputed: Related Cases:

DDIAN.:

"'04-13-f1 Number: n4 Docket No.: 05000298 Request Date: V* 5 Region: IV CaseType: ,.. Rx"e Small Entity. [] No f1Yes Licensee: Nebrask Publi Power Di~tct -act/Cy.ooper License No.: DPR-46 Last Day of Insp.: 7=2204 Insp. Rpt No.: I R-Q4!Q4 _ Keywords: -- ES: drs Facts Falluretpo perrbs re he serv*ce wa~terto s rvomialoobflguratbn f1bwng Foulnejie t~hnarpice ýtat~he Icens-ee (EATS): didnoreaibiagh the gland waterfk q service water m~aintenance. The faikare to reabn' th6 gland w~ater was attributed to indequ~ate instrctnsi. The adqteinstructions led to the cross connection of gland watr resulting ina bs-'f servie water redundiancy.

Discussion (ifrequired): One green fWnding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status folowing maintenance. DuringrbD final significance determination, the SERP members did not reach consensus on the final risk oh CC-x 5-SDP El1No nXYes Assessment x [jWhilte [Ylow NOV Yes ]No Wrongdoing [1No X Yes O Ref. Date OI Rpt No.:: 01.Rpt Date.

DOJ Referral? D No flYes Ref. Date Action Date D.ecline Accept Additional 01 Status 01 Investigating 01] E--01 needs to be notified D OMOE dispute memo needed

=1]Additional cordination needed ElAwating DOJ j]Needs coordination with DOJ Escalated. Action Consequence: [IlActual [ Potental []Reg. Impact Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? El1 No M Yes EA. Date:

IDCredit? ENo E]Yes MTBD SL:E CA Credit? ElNo ElYes Z]TBD Supp:l CP? El-No CP El Base E-Double Base ['M other:

Discretion or Order? [ No r-'Yes Explain:

Future Action Conference? 5W No EY-es [] Open El Cbsed Additional Action? 0l No VMolation Re-panel ED PEC~ Letter Choice Letter H Choice Call E St.IV NOV B Re-caucus UJRegion Issue Esc. Action U Full Package Review by HO U DEDR Review commission C U Disagreement NCV OtterAction? One green finding and violation of Criterion V A. Howell, S. Schwind, K.. Fuller, W. Walker, T. Vegel, D.Loveless, G. Shear, Participants: Region D.Chamberlain, G. Sanborn, K Kennedy, D. Loveless, S. Cochrum OE J. Luehman, G. Morell, C. Nolan, D. Starkey OGC/OI komiawionmOh rGcod wa de~

4 - 49Z

000 NOT IC S HOUT ROV H CT,0 R. Franovich, R. Giibbs, D. Coe, M.Tshilftz, M. Reinhart, S. Richards, S. Meng Wong, B. Palla, Program S. Lavie, M.Honcharik, See-Meng Wong, Office A.. E-Bassioni, R.Bywater, S.Lavie Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned:

Approved, Dir. OE: IRA/

Date: 02/09/05

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML062130184&oldid=2188432"