ML11192A251: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To: MSTROUD@entergy.com
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                     Kuntz, Robert Sent:                     Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To:                       MSTROUD@entergy.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments:
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments:               Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx
Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docxMike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.  
: Mike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.
Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov 1


Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2
Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         2741 Mail Envelope Properties  (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)
 
(301) 415-3733
 
robert.kuntz@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 2741   Mail Envelope Properties  (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date:   7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date: 7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From:   Kuntz, Robert Created By:   Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:     "MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   257     7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx   32397 Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:      
Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date:           7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date:       7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From:                 Kuntz, Robert Created By:           Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:
"MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       257                     7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx                   32397 Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:


LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.  
LICENSEE:       Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
 
FACILITY:       Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicant's methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR) .
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicants methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR) .
The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.
The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.
: 1. Inspection of small bore piping
: 1. Inspection of small bore piping:
The staff required clarification of the applicant's letter dated March 28, 2011, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The March 28, 2011, letter did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.
The staff required clarification of the applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The March 28, 2011, letter did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.
The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.
The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.
In response to the staff's questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.
In response to the staffs questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.
: 2. Inspection of steam generator components
: 2. Inspection of steam generator components:
By letter dated March 28, 2011, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.
By letter dated March 28, 2011, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the
The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 st eam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the
 
RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.
: 3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program
:  The applicant's letter dated March 28, 2011, included a revision to the planned UFSAR
 
supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.


The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.  
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc                  base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.
The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 steam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.
: 3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program:
The applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, included a revision to the planned UFSAR supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc w/encl: Listserv


Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
ML11178A335                                      *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE    LA: DLR/RPB1        PM: DLR/RPB1      BC: DLR/RPB1          PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME      SFigueroa          RKuntz            DMorey                RKuntz DATE      06/28/2011          07/  /2011      07/ /2011            07/  /2011


Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011
 
cc w/encl:  Listserv 
 
ML11178A335    *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey RKuntz DATE 06/28/2011 07/    /2011 07/    /2011 07/    /2011 Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM  
OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION:
 
HARD COPY:
DISTRIBUTION
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
HARD COPY: DLR R/F E-MAIL: PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource  
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource
 
RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource  
 
RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource  
 
RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource  
 
RidsOgcMailCenter Resource  
-------------
-------------
DMorey GMeyer, RI KGreen RConte, RI AStuyvenberg JBoska RAuluck DScrenci, RI OPA ADias NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton PCataldo, RI MKowal NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA I ENCLOSURE  TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011
DMorey                 GMeyer, RI KGreen                 RConte, RI AStuyvenberg           JBoska RAuluck                 DScrenci, RI OPA ADias                   NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton                 PCataldo, RI MKowal                 NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI           BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC           OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC             MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA           MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA             I
 
PARTICIPANTS
: A FFILIATIONS
:Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Re g ulator y Commission (NRC)Cliff K. Doutt NRC A llen L. Hise r NRCBart Z. Fu NRC


Rachel Vauche r NRCMike Stroud Enter gy Nuclear O p erations, Inc.
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011 PARTICIPANTS:                            AFFILIATIONS:
(Enter gy)Alan Cox Enter gy Ted Iv y Enter gy Reza A hrabli Enter gy Charlie Ca p uto Enter gyRich Drake Enter gyNelson Azevedo Enter gyBob Lee Enter gy}}
Robert F. Kuntz                          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Cliff K. Doutt                            NRC Allen L. Hiser                            NRC Bart Z. Fu                                NRC Rachel Vaucher                            NRC Mike Stroud                               Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)
Alan Cox                                 Entergy Ted Ivy                                  Entergy Reza Ahrabli                              Entergy Charlie Caputo                            Entergy Rich Drake                               Entergy Nelson Azevedo                           Entergy Bob Lee                                   Entergy ENCLOSURE}}

Revision as of 17:35, 12 November 2019

2011/07/11 Indian Point Lr Hearing - Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 Call
ML11192A251
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/2011
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML11192A251 (7)


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Kuntz, Robert Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:21 PM To: MSTROUD@entergy.com

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Attachments: Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx

Mike, Attached is the draft telecon summary from the call on June 9, 2011. Please let me know if any corrections/changes are necessary.

Robert Kuntz Sr. Project Manager NRR/ADRO/DLR/RPB2 (301) 415-3733 robert.kuntz@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 2741 Mail Envelope Properties (Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov20110711142100)

Subject:

Teleconference Summary for 6/9/11 call Sent Date: 7/11/2011 2:21:02 PM Received Date: 7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM From: Kuntz, Robert Created By: Robert.Kuntz@nrc.gov Recipients:

"MSTROUD@entergy.com" <MSTROUD@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 257 7/11/2011 2:21:00 PM Telecon Summary 06-09-11 SBP SG and cables.docx 32397 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM Representatives of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff), and representatives of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Entergy or the applicant), held a conference call on June 9, 2011, to discuss the applicants methodology for the inspection of small bore piping and steam generator components, and the proposed (UFSAR) .

The main issues discussed during the teleconference are summarized below.

1. Inspection of small bore piping:

The staff required clarification of the applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, in response to requests for additional information (RAIs) 3.0.3.1.10-1 and 3.0.3.1.10-2. The staff requested clarification of the number of socket welds that will be inspected in 2012 for Indian Point Unit 2 (IP-2). The March 28, 2011, letter did not clearly identify the number of samples planned for each 10-year interval. On page 15 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that at least 10 welds will be inspected. On page 16 of 27 in Attachment 1 of the March 28, 2011, letter, Entergy states that 10 welds will be inspected. The staff sought clarification if there will be 10 welds inspected, or possibly more than 10 welds will be inspected.

The staff also sought clarification on how the number of socket welds that will be inspected for IP-2 during the period of extended operation was determined. The staff sought clarification on how 10 welds per interval ensured the integrity of the components.

In response to the staffs questions, the applicant indicated that it would review its proposed aging management of socket welds for IP-2 and provide clarification as necessary.

2. Inspection of steam generator components:

By letter dated March 28, 2011, the applicant provided Commitment 41 related to the aging management of steam generator divider plates. The staff requested clarification of why the commitment only related to inspection of the welds and did not include inspection of the base metal. The applicant stated that the weld areas were most likely to experience age related degradation. The staff stated that international experience showed cracking in the

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc base metal. The applicant said it would review the commitment and revise the commitment as necessary.

The NRC also questioned the inspection timing for the two IP units. The staff questioned why the inspections were planned so that Unit 2 steam generator would be inspected with less than 20 years of service and Unit 3 steam generator with greater than 30 years of service. The staff also questioned the applicant on why the timing in Commitments 41 and 42 did not appear to align with the response to RAIs 3.1.2.2.13 and 3.1.2.2.16-1. The applicant stated that it planned the inspections for the first available outages in the respective periods of extended operation. The applicant also stated that it would review the RAI response and commitments and correct any discrepancies.

3. Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program:

The applicants letter dated March 28, 2011, included a revision to the planned UFSAR supplement for IP-2 to revise the Medium Voltage Cable Program description. However, a similar UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The staff questioned the applicant on why the planned UFSAR revision was not provided for IP-3. The applicant stated that they would provide the UFSAR revision for IP-3 in its next correspondence.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

Robert F. Kuntz, Sr. Project Manager Projects Branch 2 Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286 cc w/encl: Listserv

ML11178A335 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 BC: DLR/RPB1 PM: DLR/RPB1 NAME SFigueroa RKuntz DMorey RKuntz DATE 06/28/2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011 07/ /2011

Letter to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. from Robert F. Kuntz dated July XX, 2011

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JUNE 9, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING INSPECTION OF SMALL BORE PIPING, STEAM GENERATOR COMPONENTS, AND THE NON-EQ INACCESSIBLE MEDIUM-VOLTAGE CABLE PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION:

HARD COPY:

DLR R/F E-MAIL:

PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRarb Resource RidsNrrDlrRasb Resource RidsNrrDlrRapb Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsNrrDciCvib Resource RidsNrrDciCpnb Resource RidsNrrDraAfpb Resource RidsNrrDeEmcb Resource RidsNrrDeEeeb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssSbpb Resource RidsNrrDssScvb Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource


DMorey GMeyer, RI KGreen RConte, RI AStuyvenberg JBoska RAuluck DScrenci, RI OPA ADias NSheehan, RI OPA DPelton PCataldo, RI MKowal NMcNamara, RI DJackson, RI BWelling, RI BMizuno, OGC OAvegbusi, RI STurk, OGC MCatts, RI SBurnell, OPA MHalter, RI DMcIntyre, OPA EDacus, OCA I

TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NUMBERS 2 AND 3 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS JUNE 9, 2011 PARTICIPANTS: AFFILIATIONS:

Robert F. Kuntz U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Cliff K. Doutt NRC Allen L. Hiser NRC Bart Z. Fu NRC Rachel Vaucher NRC Mike Stroud Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy)

Alan Cox Entergy Ted Ivy Entergy Reza Ahrabli Entergy Charlie Caputo Entergy Rich Drake Entergy Nelson Azevedo Entergy Bob Lee Entergy ENCLOSURE