ML11360A045: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:56 PM To: custerc@firstenergycorp.com; dorts@firstenergycorp.com Cc: Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource | ||
; dorts@firstenergycorp.com Cc: Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Attachments: | DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Attachments: DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx Importance: High Cliff and Steve, Attached is LR new RAI on the Shield Building Cracks. Ill try to issue this one in the same letter with the RAIs on Operating Experience and SG tube to tubesheet. | ||
DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx Importance: | : Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 1 | ||
Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 2788 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0806FB4109D) | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks | DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Sent Date: 12/16/2011 1:55:58 PM Received Date: 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
"Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office: | Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 459 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx 20456 Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received: | |||
RAI B.2.39-13 | RAI B.2.39-13 | ||
==Background:== | ==Background:== | ||
In order to perform a scheduled reactor head replacement, a construction opening was made in the concrete shield building. During hydro-demolition of the concrete shield building, cracks were identified in the | In order to perform a scheduled reactor head replacement, a construction opening was made in the concrete shield building. During hydro-demolition of the concrete shield building, cracks were identified in the architectural shoulders of the shield building. While investigating the extent of the cracking, additional cracks were identified around the shield building. These additional cracks were identified using an Impulse Response (IR) technique and core bores were used to verify the IR results. | ||
Issue: Extensive cracking in the shield building could affect the structural integrity of the shield building and may impact its ability to perform its intended function during the period of extended operation. | Issue: | ||
Request: 1. Summarize the shield building degradation, the root cause, and the expected corrective actions. | Extensive cracking in the shield building could affect the structural integrity of the shield building and may impact its ability to perform its intended function during the period of extended operation. | ||
: 2. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience impacts the Shield | Request: | ||
: 1. Summarize the shield building degradation, the root cause, and the expected corrective actions. | |||
: 2. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience impacts the Shield Buildings ability to perform its intended functions during the period of extended operation. Include a list of any additional aging effects that may require management based on this operating experience. | |||
: 3. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience will be incorporated into the Structures Monitoring Program AMP, and whether the current program will be adequate to manage aging of the shield building during the period of extended operation, based on this operating experience. Specifically address the following: | : 3. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience will be incorporated into the Structures Monitoring Program AMP, and whether the current program will be adequate to manage aging of the shield building during the period of extended operation, based on this operating experience. Specifically address the following: | ||
: i. Details of tests planned to determine the long term effect of the concrete cracks on the ability of the rebars to carry design loads. ii. Plans, if any, to repair the crack or reinforce the shield building concrete. | : i. Details of tests planned to determine the long term effect of the concrete cracks on the ability of the rebars to carry design loads. | ||
ii. Plans, if any, to repair the crack or reinforce the shield building concrete. | |||
iii. Detailed plans to monitor the extent and thickness of cracks, and corrosion of the rebars over the long term. | iii. Detailed plans to monitor the extent and thickness of cracks, and corrosion of the rebars over the long term. | ||
iv. Plans, if any, to perform detailed structural analysis, with explicit modeling of rebars, cracks, and concrete, to demonstrate that the shield building will perform its intended design function over the long term. This analysis should also consider the effect of shrinkage and environment on the concrete and rebar during the period of extended operation. | iv. Plans, if any, to perform detailed structural analysis, with explicit modeling of rebars, cracks, and concrete, to demonstrate that the shield building will perform its intended design function over the long term. This analysis should also consider the effect of shrinkage and environment on the concrete and rebar during the period of extended operation. | ||
: 4. Identify and explain any changes to the license renewal application based on the recent plant specific operating experience.}} | : 4. Identify and explain any changes to the license renewal application based on the recent plant specific operating experience.}} | ||
Revision as of 10:16, 12 November 2019
| ML11360A045 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/16/2011 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| Download: ML11360A045 (3) | |
Text
Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:56 PM To: custerc@firstenergycorp.com; dorts@firstenergycorp.com Cc: Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource
Subject:
DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Attachments: DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx Importance: High Cliff and Steve, Attached is LR new RAI on the Shield Building Cracks. Ill try to issue this one in the same letter with the RAIs on Operating Experience and SG tube to tubesheet.
- Regards, Samuel Cuadrado de Jesús Project Manager Projects Branch 1 Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: 301-415-2946 Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov 1
Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 2788 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0806FB4109D)
Subject:
DB Draft RAI B.2.39-13 on Shield Building Cracks Sent Date: 12/16/2011 1:55:58 PM Received Date: 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Davis-BesseHearingFile Resource" <Davis-BesseHearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 459 12/16/2011 1:56:00 PM DB B.2.39-13 Containment Crack RAI.docx 20456 Options Priority: High Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:
RAI B.2.39-13
Background:
In order to perform a scheduled reactor head replacement, a construction opening was made in the concrete shield building. During hydro-demolition of the concrete shield building, cracks were identified in the architectural shoulders of the shield building. While investigating the extent of the cracking, additional cracks were identified around the shield building. These additional cracks were identified using an Impulse Response (IR) technique and core bores were used to verify the IR results.
Issue:
Extensive cracking in the shield building could affect the structural integrity of the shield building and may impact its ability to perform its intended function during the period of extended operation.
Request:
- 1. Summarize the shield building degradation, the root cause, and the expected corrective actions.
- 2. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience impacts the Shield Buildings ability to perform its intended functions during the period of extended operation. Include a list of any additional aging effects that may require management based on this operating experience.
- 3. Explain how the recent plant-specific operating experience will be incorporated into the Structures Monitoring Program AMP, and whether the current program will be adequate to manage aging of the shield building during the period of extended operation, based on this operating experience. Specifically address the following:
- i. Details of tests planned to determine the long term effect of the concrete cracks on the ability of the rebars to carry design loads.
ii. Plans, if any, to repair the crack or reinforce the shield building concrete.
iii. Detailed plans to monitor the extent and thickness of cracks, and corrosion of the rebars over the long term.
iv. Plans, if any, to perform detailed structural analysis, with explicit modeling of rebars, cracks, and concrete, to demonstrate that the shield building will perform its intended design function over the long term. This analysis should also consider the effect of shrinkage and environment on the concrete and rebar during the period of extended operation.
- 4. Identify and explain any changes to the license renewal application based on the recent plant specific operating experience.