ML12290A250: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:53 AM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: Tom Shaub; Cotton, Karen; Pascarelli, Robert; Gary D Miller; Johnson, Don
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                     Sreenivas, V Sent:                     Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:53 AM To:                       'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc:                       Tom Shaub; Cotton, Karen; Pascarelli, Robert; Gary D Miller; Johnson, Don


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for IS FSIs and Emergency Action Levels RevisionsBy letter dated September 27, 2012, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nucl ear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions By letter dated September 27, 2012, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597.
__________________________ V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M., Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operatin g Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation          
__________________________
V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,
Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 507   Mail Envelope Properties   (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121016105200)
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           507 Mail Envelope Properties     (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121016105200)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date:   10/16/2012 10:52:42 AM Received Date: 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM From:   Sreenivas, V Created By:   V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com>
NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date:             10/16/2012 10:52:42 AM Received Date:         10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM From:                   Sreenivas, V Created By:             V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1774     10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM
"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com>
 
Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None
"'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                           Size                 Date & Time MESSAGE                         1774                 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 No Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 21:15, 11 November 2019

North Annorth Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2-ACCEPTANCE Review, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions
ML12290A250
Person / Time
Site: Surry, North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/2012
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D
Dominion Generation
References
Download: ML12290A250 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:53 AM To: 'david.heacock@dom.com' Cc: Tom Shaub; Cotton, Karen; Pascarelli, Robert; Gary D Miller; Johnson, Don

Subject:

NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions By letter dated September 27, 2012, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted a license amendment request for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions for North Anna and Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed exemption request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-2597.

__________________________

V. Sreenivas, PH.D., C.P.M.,

Project Manager, LPL2-1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 507 Mail Envelope Properties (V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov20121016105200)

Subject:

NORTH ANNORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2-ACCEPTANCE REVIEW, Proposed LAR for ISFSIs and Emergency Action Levels Revisions Sent Date: 10/16/2012 10:52:42 AM Received Date: 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM From: Sreenivas, V Created By: V.Sreenivas@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None "Cotton, Karen" <Karen.Cotton@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Pascarelli, Robert" <Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Gary D Miller" <gary.d.miller@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None "Johnson, Don" <Don.Johnson@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

"'david.heacock@dom.com'" <david.heacock@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1774 10/16/2012 10:52:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: