ML12293A380: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 IPRenewal NPEmails From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:35 PM To: Wong, Melanie Cc: Gray, Dara F; IPRenewal NPEmails
{{#Wiki_filter:IPRenewal NPEmails From:                       Logan, Dennis Sent:                       Friday, October 19, 2012 2:35 PM To:                         Wong, Melanie Cc:                         Gray, Dara F; IPRenewal NPEmails


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion FYI From: Julie Crocker [mailto:julie.crocker@noaa.gov
FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion FYI From: Julie Crocker [mailto:julie.crocker@noaa.gov]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:32 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael  
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:32 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Re: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Dennis -  
Re: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Dennis -
 
We are working to get it to you as quickly as we can and will try to get it to you as early in the week as possible.
We are working to get it to you as quickly as we can and wi ll try to get it to you as early in the week as possible.  
Julie
 
----- Forwarded Message -----
Julie    ----- Forwarded Message -----
From: "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>
From: "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov
To: 'Julie Email' <jecrocker@verizon.net>; "Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>
> To: 'Julie Email' <
Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>; "Wentzel, Michael"
jecrocker@verizon.net>; "Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov
<Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>; "'DGray@Entergy.com'" <DGray@Entergy.com>
Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:22 AM
>; "Wentzel, Michael" <Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>; "'DGray@Entergy.com'" <
DGray@Entergy.com
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:22 AM  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Julie, I have some concern if by "towards th e end of that week," you mean Friday close of business. Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and we have the holiday, which puts some time constraints on our review and your response.
RE: Draft Indian point opinion Julie, I have some concern if by "towards the end of that week," you mean Friday close of business. Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and we have the holiday, which puts some time constraints on our review and your response.
A delay of only a day or two would make little difference, however, and we would be fine with that.
A delay of only a day or two would make little difference, however, and we would be fine with that.
I discussed this with Dara Gray at Entergy, and Entergy's concern is similar to NRC's.
I discussed this with Dara Gray at Entergy, and Entergy's concern is similar to NRC's.
Dennis   -----Original Message----- From: Julie Email [mailto:
Dennis
jecrocker@verizon.net
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana  
From: Julie Email [mailto:jecrocker@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Draft Indian point opinion 2 Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian poi nt - we had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be mo re towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns Julie   
Draft Indian point opinion 1


Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian point - we had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be more towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns Julie
--
--
Julie Crocker  
Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 2
 
Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service  
 
55 Great Republic Drive  


Gloucester, MA 01930
Hearing Identifier:   IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:         3882 Mail Envelope Properties  (A56E37EC1CBC8045910287CEF5E7AE6C011F5485D9BB)
 
Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3882   Mail Envelope Properties  (A56E37EC1CBC8045910287CEF5E7AE6C011F5485D9BB)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date:   10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Received Date: 10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM From:   Logan, Dennis Created By:   Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>
FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date:           10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Received Date:       10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM From:                 Logan, Dennis Created By:           Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov Recipients:
Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
"Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Wong, Melanie" <Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>
 
Tracking Status: None "Wong, Melanie" <Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov>
Post Office:   HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2435     10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None Post Office:         HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files                       Size                       Date & Time MESSAGE                     2435                       10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Options Priority:                   Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 21:09, 11 November 2019

2012/10/19 Indian Point Lr Hearing - FW: Fw: Draft Indian Point Opinion
ML12293A380
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/19/2012
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML12293A380 (3)


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:35 PM To: Wong, Melanie Cc: Gray, Dara F; IPRenewal NPEmails

Subject:

FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion FYI From: Julie Crocker [1]

Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 2:32 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana; Wentzel, Michael

Subject:

Re: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Dennis -

We are working to get it to you as quickly as we can and will try to get it to you as early in the week as possible.

Julie


Forwarded Message -----

From: "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>

To: 'Julie Email' <jecrocker@verizon.net>; "Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>

Cc: IPRenewal NPEmails <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>; "Wentzel, Michael"

<Michael.Wentzel@nrc.gov>; "'DGray@Entergy.com'" <DGray@Entergy.com>

Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:22 AM

Subject:

RE: Draft Indian point opinion Julie, I have some concern if by "towards the end of that week," you mean Friday close of business. Both Entergy and NRC need time to comment and get back to NMFS in time that NMFS can then incorporate the comments and produce the final. I will be out of the office the week of November 12 to 16, and we have the holiday, which puts some time constraints on our review and your response.

A delay of only a day or two would make little difference, however, and we would be fine with that.

I discussed this with Dara Gray at Entergy, and Entergy's concern is similar to NRC's.

Dennis


Original Message-----

From: Julie Email [2]

Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:53 PM To: Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana

Subject:

Draft Indian point opinion 1

Hi Dennis We are making good progress on internal review of the draft opinion for Indian point - we had told you we would have it to you on oct 22 but it is looking like it will be more towards the end of that week. Just wanted to let you know. I think we have enough time built in after that (final due nov 28) that meeting the final date will not be a problem. Let me know if you have any concerns Julie

--

Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 2

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3882 Mail Envelope Properties (A56E37EC1CBC8045910287CEF5E7AE6C011F5485D9BB)

Subject:

FW: Fw: Draft Indian point opinion Sent Date: 10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Received Date: 10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM From: Logan, Dennis Created By: Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "IPRenewal NPEmails" <IPRenewal.NPEmails@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Wong, Melanie" <Melanie.Wong@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2435 10/19/2012 2:35:15 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: