RC-13-0126, Supplemental Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi..: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:p IRformation Withheld from Public DiSclosure Under 10 2.390 Thomas D. Gatlin Vice-President Nuclear Operations (803) 345-4342 A SCANA COMPANY August 22, 2013 RC-1 3-0126 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 | {{#Wiki_filter:p Sen*.utve IRformation Withheld from Public DiSclosure Under 10 CF*nR 2.390 Thomas D. Gatlin Vice-President Nuclear Operations (803) 345-4342 A SCANA COMPANY August 22, 2013 RC-1 3-0126 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 | ||
==Dear Sir/Madam:== | ==Dear Sir/Madam:== | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY (SCE&G)SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f) REGARDING THE FLOODING ASPECTS OF RECOMMENDATION 2.1 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE REVIEW OF INSIGHTS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT | VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY (SCE&G) | ||
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f) REGARDING THE FLOODING ASPECTS OF RECOMMENDATION 2.1 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE REVIEW OF INSIGHTS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT | |||
==References:== | ==References:== | ||
: 1. NRC Letter, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," March 12, 2012 [ML12053A340] | : 1. NRC Letter, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," March 12, 2012 [ML12053A340] | ||
: 2. SCE&G to NRC, Flooding Reevaluation Results for Virgil C. Summer Unit 1 dated March 12, 2013 (RC-13-0038) | : 2. SCE&G to NRC, Flooding Reevaluation Results for Virgil C. Summer Unit 1 dated March 12, 2013 (RC-13-0038) | ||
On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 2 of Reference 1 requested that each licensee perform a reevaluation of external flooding sources and report the results in accordance with the NRC's prioritization plan. South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G)submitted theflood reevaluation for V.C. Summer Unit 1 (VCSNS) in Reference | On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 2 of Reference 1 requested that each licensee perform a reevaluation of external flooding sources and report the results in accordance with the NRC's prioritization plan. South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) submitted theflood reevaluation for V.C. Summer Unit 1 (VCSNS) in Reference 2. Reference 2 contains interim actions that SCE&G has taken or plans to take to address higher flooding hazards relative to the design basis until the integrated assessment is completed. | ||
The enclosed table provides a list of the interim actions taken or planned to be taken as contained in Reference 2 along with additional supporting details and the dates by which they have or will be implemented. SCE&G commits to notify its NRR project manager prior to modifying these interim actions or completion dates. | |||
The enclosed table provides a list of the interim actions taken or planned to be taken as contained in Reference 2 along with additional supporting details and the dates by which they have or will be implemented. | This letter contains new regulatory commitments. | ||
SCE&G commits to notify its NRR project manager prior to modifying these interim actions or completion dates.This letter contains new regulatory commitments. | Attachment 111,Operations Administr-ativ" Procedure, GAP 109.1 new nlor..... " u,*."a dine- f Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" trans~mittd hcrcw~fith containq qsonsitiv0ifrmain WAhn scparatcd- from Attachmnent 111, this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled. | ||
Attachment 111, Operations Administr-ativ" Procedure, GAP 109.1 new nlor ..... " dine- f Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" trans~mittd hcrcw~fith containq qsonsitiv0ifrmain WAhn scparatcd-from Attachmnent 111, this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled. | SR.n.te'- Information Withhold from Public Di*closure Undcr 10 CFR 2.390 Virgil C.Summer Station . Post Office Box 88 *Jenkinsville, SC.29065 . F(803) 941-9776 | ||
SR.n.te'- | |||
Information Withhold from Public Undcr 10 CFR 2.390 Virgil C. Summer Station .Post Office Box 88 | Scnsitive I nfor--atiot n Withhold from Public Disclcu-re Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR- 2-01098 RC-1 3-0126 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact Bruce L. | ||
* Jenkinsville, SC. 29065 .F (803) 941-9776 Scnsitive I nfor--atiot n Withhold from Public Disclcu-re Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR- 2-01098 RC-1 3-0126 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact Bruce L.Thompson at (803) 931-5042.I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on 'Thomas D. Gatlin BQ/TDG/mm Attachments: | Thompson at (803) 931-5042. | ||
I. List of Regulatory Commitments II. Reevaluation Report Interim Action Commitments Ill. Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" Redacted Version c: (without attachments unless noted)K. B. Marsh S. A. Byrne J. B. Archie N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton J. W. Williams W. M. Cherry E. J. Leeds V. M. McCree (w/attachments) | I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. | ||
Executed on 'Thomas D. Gatlin BQ/TDG/mm Attachments: | |||
I. List of Regulatory Commitments II. Reevaluation Report Interim Action Commitments Ill. Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" Redacted Version c: (without attachments unless noted) | |||
K. B. Marsh S. A. Byrne J. B. Archie N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton J. W. Williams W. M. Cherry E. J. Leeds V. M. McCree (w/attachments) | |||
R. E. Martin (w/attachments) | R. E. Martin (w/attachments) | ||
NRC Resident Inspector K. M. Sutton NSRC RTS (CR-12-01098) | NRC Resident Inspector K. M. Sutton NSRC RTS (CR-12-01098) | ||
File (815.07)PRSF (RC-13-0126) | File (815.07) | ||
AMachmcnt 111, Opcrations Ad-Minic-trativc Proccduro, GAP 109.1 now E..ncls uer E "Gu-delines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" tranSMitted her.with , ontains sensitie i.formation. | PRSF (RC-13-0126) | ||
Whcn scparated from Attachmcent | AMachmcnt 111, Opcrations Ad-Minic-trativc Proccduro, GAP 109.1 now E..ncls uer E "Gu-delines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" tranSMitted her.with | ||
'11, this transmittal document is dccontrOllcd. | , ontains sensitie i.formation. Whcn scparated from Attachmcent '11,this transmittal document is dccontrOllcd. | ||
SenSiti':o Infora-F-tiOn Withhold from Public Disclosur!e Under 10 CFR 2.390 | SenSiti':o Infora-F-tiOn Withhold from Public Disclosur!e Under 10 CFR 2.390 | ||
..F..matio, fro^m Pub.lic DilclosGur@ | |||
Under In 2.300 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 1 of 1 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT I LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies those actions committed to by SCE&G, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station in this document and Reference | enw:i.*. .. F..matio, Wit;hho9*d* fro^m Pub.lic DilclosGur@ Under In C*FR 2.300 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 1 of 1 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT I LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies those actions committed to by SCE&G, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station in this document and Reference 2. Please direct questions regarding these commitments to Mr. Bruce L. Thompson, Manager, Nuclear Licensing, (803) 931-5042. | ||
COMMITMENT Due Date/Event Update Station procedures to include 10 year surveys of the February 28, 2014 North Berm elevation. | |||
Initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the February 28, 2014 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm.Perform Preventative Maintenance (PM) inspections for Perform Quarterly Per clearance of underground drainage pathways. | Initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the February 28, 2014 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm. | ||
the PM Program VCSNS to maintain procedure OAP-1 09.1 for the sand bag Until a permanent placement until a permanent solution is implemented. | Perform Preventative Maintenance (PM) inspections for Perform Quarterly Per clearance of underground drainage pathways. the PM Program VCSNS to maintain procedure OAP-1 09.1 for the sand bag Until a permanent placement until a permanent solution is implemented. solution is implemented Atta.hm.nt 111,Operations Administrative Precoduro, GAP 108.1 noW .. c.ourc En"Guidelines for S-andb1-agging Ground-Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains sensitive inomto.When separated from Attachment 111. this transmittal documcnt is dcconrollod bensorvin O OFM a110n wInni rFRLI-ro-M r.U-nic- unsriosurc undecr 10u C.rI F- .90 | ||
solution is implemented Atta.hm.nt 111, Operations Administrative Precoduro, GAP 108.1 noW ..c.ourc En "Guidelines for S-andb1-agging Ground- Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains sensitive inomto.When separated from Attachment 111. this transmittal documcnt is dcconrollod | |||
CR-12-04133 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.1)During review of site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in response to Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, the Flooding Walkdown Team identified discrepancies related to site dams and embankments. | Sensit'ive Informtion Withhold from P-blic D-clos'ure Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment II Page 1 of 3 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT II Reevaluation Report Interim Action Commitments The following Condition Reports (CRs) were prepared in response to the finding of the Flood Hazard Reevaluation. | ||
The following was identified during the study of site topographical surveys performed as part of Fukushima Recommendation 2.1/2.3 response (Performed per PO# NU-02NN747697). | CR-12-04133 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.1) | ||
The surveys were submitted with accuracy of 0.1 feet at the dam/berm profiles.* The North Berm (DE-1) was identified as having local low points in crest at elevation 437.7 feet.* The SW Pond North Dam (DE-2) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.1 feet.* The SW Pond East Dam (DE-3) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.5 feet.FSAR Section 2.10 states that the crest of the North Berm, SW Pond North Dam, and SW Pond East Dam are all at elevation 438.0 feet. The 438.0 feet elevation was determined to be sufficient to protect the site's Seismic Category 1 structures from coincident wind-wave activity along with PMF (probable maximum flood of Frees Creek). The maximum wave run-up on the North Berm is 436.6 feet (Reference FSAR Section 2.4.3.6) and the maximum wave run-up for the Service Water Pond North and East dam was determined to be elevation 435.9 feet (Reference DC02230-005 Rev 1).Although the Dam/Berm crest elevations are below 438.0 feet, there is still available physical margin between the current Dam/Berm crest elevation and the maximum wave run-up elevation. | During review of site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in response to Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, the Flooding Walkdown Team identified discrepancies related to site dams and embankments. The following was identified during the study of site topographical surveys performed as part of Fukushima Recommendation 2.1/2.3 response (Performed per PO# NU-02NN747697). The surveys were submitted with accuracy of 0.1 feet at the dam/berm profiles. | ||
* The North Berm (DE-1) was identified as having local low points in crest at elevation 437.7 feet. | |||
* The SW Pond North Dam (DE-2) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.1 feet. | |||
* The SW Pond East Dam (DE-3) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.5 feet. | |||
FSAR Section 2.10 states that the crest of the North Berm, SW Pond North Dam, and SW Pond East Dam are all at elevation 438.0 feet. The 438.0 feet elevation was determined to be sufficient to protect the site's Seismic Category 1 structures from coincident wind-wave activity along with PMF (probable maximum flood of Frees Creek). The maximum wave run-up on the North Berm is 436.6 feet (Reference FSAR Section 2.4.3.6) and the maximum wave run-up for the Service Water Pond North and East dam was determined to be elevation 435.9 feet (Reference DC02230-005 Rev 1). | |||
Although the Dam/Berm crest elevations are below 438.0 feet, there is still available physical margin between the current Dam/Berm crest elevation and the maximum wave run-up elevation. | |||
It is also noted that the SW Pond North and East dam require protection against wind-wave activity generated in the SW Pond. The maximum elevation of wind-wave run-up generated in the SW Pond is 433.6 feet, which is bounded for the SW Pond North and East dam by the wind-wave activity from Monticello Reservoir. | It is also noted that the SW Pond North and East dam require protection against wind-wave activity generated in the SW Pond. The maximum elevation of wind-wave run-up generated in the SW Pond is 433.6 feet, which is bounded for the SW Pond North and East dam by the wind-wave activity from Monticello Reservoir. | ||
Operations Administrative Proredurc, 0pAP 10-9.1 ntem Enlocsurem E "Guidclnc fRs Attac~hment 111, Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" tra;R~_n"emtd_ herewith contains sensitive information. Whc separated from Attachment !"l,thfis transmittal document is decontrolled. | |||
herewith contains sensitive information. | Sensitive Information Withhold from Publirc Discdos'-r Undcr 10 CFR 2.390 | ||
Whc separated from Attachment | |||
!"l, thfis transmittal document is decontrolled. | Scnsitive Inform.tion Withhold fromn Publi DicSlo'U:r Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 2 of 3 The available physical margins are as follows: | ||
Sensitive Information Withhold from Publirc Discdos'-r Undcr 10 CFR 2.390 Scnsitive Inform.tion Withhold fromn Publi DicSlo'U:r Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 2 of 3 The available physical margins are as follows: " North Berm -(437.7 feet -436.6 feet) = 1.1 feet" SW Pond North Dam -(437.1 feet -435.9 feet) = 1.2 feet SW Pond East Dam -(437.5 feet -435.9 feet) = 1.6 feet A Technical Work Record was written to include a more detailed evaluation of the design bases of the top elevation of the dams and embankments and their current margin compared to design bases requirements. | " North Berm - (437.7 feet - 436.6 feet) = 1.1 feet | ||
The impact of the current low-point elevations is a reduction in margin. The probable cause of the event was original construction of the North Berm and SW Pond Dams and West Embankment. | " SW Pond North Dam - (437.1 feet - 435.9 feet) = 1.2 feet SW Pond East Dam - (437.5 feet - 435.9 feet) = 1.6 feet A Technical Work Record was written to include a more detailed evaluation of the design bases of the top elevation of the dams and embankments and their current margin compared to design bases requirements. | ||
A contributing factor is potential erosion and settlement of the earthen structures. | The impact of the current low-point elevations is a reduction in margin. The probable cause of the event was original construction of the North Berm and SW Pond Dams and West Embankment. A contributing factor is potential erosion and settlement of the earthen structures. | ||
Actions Planned: Action 1 in this CR has been initiated for Design Engineering to provide necessary information for procedural updates to begin 10 year elevation surveys of the North Berm. (Updates to CV-01, CMP-700.001, ES-400 will be reviewed for Applicability.) | Actions Planned: | ||
Take elevation measurements at 50 foot intervals along crest of North Berm. Continue measurements from the Circulating Water Intake Structure to the Monticello/Fairfield Dam for at least two 50 foot intervals on the dam.Action 2 has been initiated to initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm.Implementation Date: 2/28/2014 CR-I 2-03267 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.2)During review of the site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in support of Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, a discrepancy was noted between the FSAR stated site maximum ponding level and the Nuclear Safety Related building flood protection features.The probable cause of the condition appears to be facility design errors during original plant licensing and construction. | Action 1 in this CR has been initiated for Design Engineering to provide necessary information for procedural updates to begin 10 year elevation surveys of the North Berm. (Updates to CV-01, CMP-700.001, ES-400 will be reviewed for Applicability.) Take elevation measurements at 50 foot intervals along crest of North Berm. Continue measurements from the Circulating Water Intake Structure to the Monticello/Fairfield Dam for at least two 50 foot intervals on the dam. | ||
The original flood protection analysis to protect site from local intense precipitation (LIP) was deemed inadequate by NRC as documented in FSAR Question 371.1. The NRC position was that the subsurface storm water drainage system design did not adequately consider blockage in original analysis. | Action 2 has been initiated to initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm. | ||
The NRC requested the site re-analyze the effects of LIP on site flooding considering partial or total impairment of the subsurface drainage system; and that if only partial impairment is assumed the site must demonstrate it as a conservative assumption. | Implementation Date: | ||
In response, the site revised the FSAR section 2.4.3.1.3 to provide information from an analysis for a 6-hour PMP assuming total impairment of the subsurface drainage system, using only Attachmcnt 111, Opcrations Administrative Proccdurc, OAP 109.1 new En.co'-Sr E "Guidclincs for SAndbagging Ground | 2/28/2014 CR-I 2-03267 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.2) | ||
Whon separated from Attachmcnt 111, this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled. | During review of the site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in support of Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, a discrepancy was noted between the FSAR stated site maximum ponding level and the Nuclear Safety Related building flood protection features. | ||
Snsitv" Information Withhold from Public Dis.losur. | The probable cause of the condition appears to be facility design errors during original plant licensing and construction. The original flood protection analysis to protect site from local intense precipitation (LIP) was deemed inadequate by NRC as documented in FSAR Question 371.1. The NRC position was that the subsurface storm water drainage system design did not adequately consider blockage in original analysis. The NRC requested the site re-analyze the effects of LIP on site flooding considering partial or total impairment of the subsurface drainage system; and that if only partial impairment is assumed the site must demonstrate it as a conservative assumption. | ||
Undc. | In response, the site revised the FSAR section 2.4.3.1.3 to provide information from an analysis for a 6-hour PMP assuming total impairment of the subsurface drainage system, using only Attachmcnt 111,Opcrations Administrative Proccdurc, OAP 109.1 new En.co'-Sr E "Guidclincs for SAndbagging Ground 1oeve, Plant Dears" transmitted herewith contafins scnsoithc inform~matin. Whon separated from Attachmcnt 111,this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled. | ||
Additional analysis was performed as part of NTTF 2.1-Flooding Hazard Re-Evaluation and concluded that the actual site ponding elevation due to the design basis PMP event was 437.5 feet on the West Side of the Power Block and 436.5 feet on the East Side of the Power Block.Interim Actions: Immediate actions were required. | Snsitv" Information Withhold from Public Dis.losur. Undc. | ||
At the time the CR was written, Security initiated additional checks for Protected Area (PA) manhole drainage. | .FR 10 2.390 | ||
Patrol Officers were directed to inspect drainage manholes inside the PA to ensure no drainage issues. Civil Maintenance is currently performing these inspections following the below specific instructions for conducting an inspection: | |||
General visual inspections are performed on each catch basin shown on drawing 743-001 for catch basin manhole inlet blockage as well as for potentially transportable materials in the immediate vicinity that could result in manhole blockage.* Any blockages or debris on the catch basins grating should be removed during the inspections; this includes any rocks, plastic materials, or other debris. CRs are initiated as necessary to trim grass or other vegetation back to at least 6 inches clear all around the grating.* If the debris cannot be removed by personnel during normal inspections, a new CR should be written to document the deficiency. | Sensitvc intOrMatin Withhold troM Plublica DISCloSUrc Under 10 CFIR 2.3U Document Control Desk CR-1 2-01098 RC-1 3-0126 Attachment II Page 3 of 3 overland drainage flow. The overland flow analysis took into consideration the available site storage area up to elevation 436 feet along with the assumption that the road centerlines were at elevation 436 feet and bound the site. A weir flow was then assumed over the road crest and it was determined that during the 6-hour PMP the ponding elevation will not rise above elevation 436.15 feet. The value was greater than the original high ponding elevation of 435.4 feet when considering a functioning subsurface drainage system. The delta between the 436.15 feet and 435.4 feet elevation appears to have not been properly evaluated for the effect it could potentially have on plant equipment considering the Seismic Category 1 building door thresholds were at approximate elevation 436 feet. The potential for water infiltration into buildings, then migrating down to lower elevations via open passageways was not properly documented in the site design documentation. Additional analysis was performed as part of NTTF 2.1-Flooding Hazard Re-Evaluation and concluded that the actual site ponding elevation due to the design basis PMP event was 437.5 feet on the West Side of the Power Block and 436.5 feet on the East Side of the Power Block. | ||
Operations has updated the Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-1 09.1 to include"Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" in a new enclosure E. This new enclosure provides direction on when, where to, and how to install the available sandbags to protect power block structures during LIP event. Enclosure E also provides the storage location and proper storage condition of sandbags when not in use. The storage containers for the sandbags are maintained in a suitable storage location. | Interim Actions: | ||
The sandbags and containers have been pre-inspected and sealed for transport into the protected area for a timely deployment. | Immediate actions were required. At the time the CR was written, Security initiated additional checks for Protected Area (PA) manhole drainage. Patrol Officers were directed to inspect drainage manholes inside the PA to ensure no drainage issues. Civil Maintenance is currently performing these inspections following the below specific instructions for conducting an inspection: | ||
The construction of sandbag revetment uses similar concepts to those used in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Field Manual.Implementation Date: The procurement of sandbags and revision to site procedures are complete.Attachment 111, Operations Adminie-t-rmtatvo Perocdure, OAP 109.1 n~ewcocr En "Guidelines o Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains scnsftifcinfrmtin Whn scoarated from Attarhmcnt III, this transmittal decumcnt | General visual inspections are performed on each catch basin shown on drawing 743-001 for catch basin manhole inlet blockage as well as for potentially transportable materials in the immediate vicinity that could result in manhole blockage. | ||
... .. A ......tcnsIt.c intoratio Witlhho Iro rm 1Publlic n Isco | * Any blockages or debris on the catch basins grating should be removed during the inspections; this includes any rocks, plastic materials, or other debris. CRs are initiated as necessary to trim grass or other vegetation back to at least 6 inches clear all around the grating. | ||
A ......bensitivc information witnnewc from i-'ublig Ic Li-Scoure uncoer | * If the debris cannot be removed by personnel during normal inspections, a new CR should be written to document the deficiency. | ||
F I II ~CflZITI'.~C inrcrmation WITflflOId worn I-'unhic uizcio~tim Undor iu uI-I-~ ~iuu OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 1 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS A. This Enclosure contains the following information: | Operations has updated the Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-1 09.1 to include "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" in a new enclosure E. This new enclosure provides direction on when, where to, and how to install the available sandbags to protect power block structures during LIP event. Enclosure E also provides the storage location and proper storage condition of sandbags when not in use. The storage containers for the sandbags are maintained in a suitable storage location. The sandbags and containers have been pre-inspected and sealed for transport into the protected area for a timely deployment. The construction of sandbag revetment uses similar concepts to those used in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Field Manual. | ||
Implementation Date: | |||
The procurement of sandbags and revision to site procedures are complete. | |||
Attachment 111,Operations Adminie-t-rmtatvo Perocdure, OAP 109.1 n~ewcocr En"Guidelines o Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains scnsftifcinfrmtin Whn scoarated from Attarhmcnt III, this transmittal decumcnt is decontrolled. | |||
... .. A ...... | |||
tcnsIt.c intoratio Witlhho Iro rm 1Publlic n Isco lrlndcI .IU C--l Gt" *3 | |||
Fiqlriv .30raro "Ilaoi al s ra~ | |||
om i uiecioer | |||
-q, I I 0 e I 4 u'.ii A AP* A AAA Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment III Page 1 of 26 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT III Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" 2.390 Attac~hment 111,Operations Administrative Poroedure, 0-AP-t109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelincs for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" transmitted hcrcwith contains sensitive inoraton hn separated from Attachment 111, thus transmittal document us decontrolled. | |||
A ...... | |||
bensitivc information witnnewc from i-'ublig Ic Li-Scoure uncoer WULi-K 2. | |||
F | |||
* I II *D | |||
~CflZITI'.~C inrcrmation WITflflOId worn I-'unhic uizcio~tim Undor iu uI-I-~ ~iuu OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 1 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS A. This Enclosure contains the following information: | |||
: 1) Plant layout drawing showing Door Number and location of all ground level doors and passage ways to be sandbagged (21 locations). | : 1) Plant layout drawing showing Door Number and location of all ground level doors and passage ways to be sandbagged (21 locations). | ||
: 2) Instructions for sandbagging a typical door.3) A photograph of each of the doors (and passage ways) with the sandbags installed. | : 2) Instructions for sandbagging a typical door. | ||
B. The photographs of the doors are grouped by building as follows: 1) Auxiliary Building.2) Fuel Handling Building.3) Diesel Building (and East Penetration area).4) Intermediate Building.5) Control Building.C. It may be necessary to use more sandbags than are shown in these photographs in order to get a good seal on each door.D.NOTE E Sandbag containers have Security Seals on them which prevent the lids from being opened. In order to expedite bringing these containers into the Protected Area, the Security Seals must not be broken until the containers are inside the Protected Area.E. Sandbags used for this procedure are stored on the Warehouse B loading dock in two yellow metal containers labeled "Sandbags | : 3) A photograph of each of the doors (and passage ways) with the sandbags installed. | ||
-Flood Control".ýCnietivo IRefintormzition-1 | B. The photographs of the doors are grouped by building as follows: | ||
: 1) Auxiliary Building. | |||
'Itflfloeitd tromR Punhic DIzcIozure UL-JdeF | : 2) Fuel Handling Building. | ||
[trom8 | : 3) Diesel Building (and East Penetration area). | ||
-;,, | : 4) Intermediate Building. | ||
ý.":itnnoi | : 5) Control Building. | ||
InfAorm;-AiA-Wiithhold fromf Publi Dire'oGUrc Under 10 CPR :2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 10 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)HALLWAY NEXT TO FUEL HANDLING BUILDING TRAIN BAY E~eneitwve Informfation Wimthhold fro.m Pub--lic-DWicciocuro~ | C. It may be necessary to use more sandbags than are shown in these photographs in order to get a good seal on each door. | ||
Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 Scnsitivo Infeormi~tieo Withheld fromA Public DIzzGIEzurc UndeF 10 CFR 2.39 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 11 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)FH-303 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY)Sensofitk Withhold fro , Public Di*cI;Ulr Und.r 10 CFR 2.3.0 | D. | ||
~cnznivc in~ormotion v':itnnoia from I-'UDIIC uicoi~zurc uncicr U ui-r~ ~~UU OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 12 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)FH-304 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY)S-en-tve Inf.orm;atio WAli.g.thho-ld from Pulblic Di"GI,,rI lUnder 10 GFR 2.30' Scnzitivc Information Withhold from Public Dil.clocuro Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 13 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)FH-305 (ON SOUTH WALL OF FUEL HANDLING BUILDING)benzitr've Intarmatien lwilthela-trefm Public 6 seclozrUc Undcr 10 Cl-F- 2.31 | NOTE E Sandbag containers have Security Seals on them which prevent the lids from being opened. In order to expedite bringing these containers into the Protected Area, the Security Seals must not be broken until the containers are inside the Protected Area. | ||
E. Sandbags used for this procedure are stored on the Warehouse B loading dock in two yellow metal containers labeled "Sandbags - Flood Control". | |||
~.":itnnoi~i Trom I-~uDIIo UIzci3zurc Under 10 CFR 2.300 | Wifflold | ||
'.'~.'iinnoi~i worn ruoiic uicciocurc un~cr U ur-r~ .~iuu S :ns;,,e Withhold from Public Disl.urc Under | ýCnietivo IRefintormzition-1 UM DwornH~ 1-uni ind 11U: | ||
o Withheld from Publi, ,Disocuer. | Iizcozur 2299~~. | ||
.ndo. 10 CFR 2.3nn Secseive~ | |||
!fflnformion Withheld fromR Public Diselozurz Undcr 10 CER 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 23 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)CB-302 (NEAR CONTROL BUILDING ELEVATOR) | ri.. --iiv-- n, 'mt. | ||
WAcicur | . | ||
f I Ii | |||
~in.o Trom i-Uhcuicouc | |||
* *o nc 0 F . | |||
OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 2 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
PLANT LAYOUT AB-417A FHB Hallway PA-205 IB-302 CB-302 AB-418 FH-303 DB-301 IB-304 CB-301 AB-419 FH-304 DB-302 IB-305 CB-326 AB-406 (rollup) FH-305 DB-305 IB-313 AB-407 IB-314A Scnsitevc lnfcrmntien Withheld from Public Disclcur WndeFr110 GPR 2.399 | |||
Sen;i.;, Inform.ation Withheld fr-lmi Publi. DI';I1 1 ,, II.,r 40 CFR 2.3 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 3 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
TYPICAL METHOD TO INSTALL SANDBAGS ON A DOOR | |||
: 1) Lay plastic sheet on floor to seal bottom edge of door. | |||
: 2) Stack sandbags on top of plastic sheet until top of stack is at least 18 inches above the finished floor grade. | |||
f ..... | |||
s ntr~mntion 1nitf. | |||
A 'Itflfloeitd tromR Punhic DIzcIozure UL-JdeF QUUI- 2 "On | |||
Se ;s;tiv. I1nferMot*8 Withhold Fr Publi* DI-)clo,,rc UndeF10* -R 2.300 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 4 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS STEPS TO INSTALL SANDBAGS ON TYPICAL DOOR (CONT'D) | |||
: 3) Fold plastic sheet over top of upper layer of sandbags. | |||
: 4) Place layer of sandbags on top of plastic sheet. | |||
Seinnon ve Seitr;9Ma;io 1 | |||
f VVAnnoia wornA | |||
* P-uniio uizciozure un i iI *. | |||
.0 6cu O.-In | |||
onIIRciTo8-RmAffion RIIRR Trom fmnnoi !1 ISE)IcioUr WUD uncre lid Fi-- | |||
P' .jl OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 5 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
AB-417A (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP) bensiti'.e I~flTOF'atIlB WIIRF18EIG Tr~ff ['IH81IC UflOF IIO3~F 4W &UI[ .4 A | |||
f | |||
* I l* | |||
~iNPR'eIWRFrll intormrnion fWitflflcid [trom8 1ic~zr 40 UI-unacrF Feufhi 2.39n OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 6 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
AB-418 (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP) | |||
This door will not open with sandbags in place. | |||
ibenlZiTIv intorma1eF '.~IfflOI3 WRion traWBUIIG "uI6cI5Wrc na8W 11d "P-M -. 6 | |||
-;,,SoniiIf*ormAt*io WithhAld froml- Public Dic*:l r, I IUndor 1tF0 CF--R "2.00 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 7 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
AB-419 (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP) | |||
Sencitive Info-rmaion~A- Withholld fromPubic Dicclocu'rc ndr 0 FR2. | |||
W R al e.F 19- Q F R 2. 2-A-Q | |||
Noncitlrv Infor,-sAtisn Withhs-ld from Public Ui clozurc Undcr 1F 19 II, 2.399 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 8 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
AB-406 (AB ROLLUP DOOR) | |||
I m I 6cszitive In)formation WitriHOEld fromF Public 0Ui6o8ozurc Undcr1e 10FGFR R 2.3 | |||
.0 | |||
benzstivc inWormmein from'8U~ | |||
ý.":itnnoi WUICuzizr nac iU "l-i- zzdW OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 9 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
AB-407 (NEXT TO AB ROLLUP DOOR) | |||
~cnzItivc inrorm~iri~n vvitnnoia worn VUDIIC UI~CI3Cur3 unuor iu u~r. ~uu | |||
genscive~ InfAorm;-AiA- Wiithhold fromf Publi Dire'oGUrc Under 10 CPR :2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 10 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
HALLWAY NEXT TO FUEL HANDLING BUILDING TRAIN BAY E~eneitwve Informfation Wimthhold fro.m Pub--lic- DWicciocuro~ Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 | |||
Scnsitivo Infeormi~tieo Withheld fromA Public DIzzGIEzurc UndeF 10 CFR 2.39 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 11 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
FH-303 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY) | |||
Sensofitk ln*formti;n Withhold fro , | |||
Public Di*cI;Ulr Und.r 10 CFR 2.3.0 | |||
~cnznivc in~ormotion v':itnnoia from I-'UDIIC uicoi~zurc uncicr U ui-r~ ~~UU OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 12 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
FH-304 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY) | |||
S-en-tve Inf.orm;atio WAli.g.thho-ld from Pulblic Di"GI,,rI lUnder 10 GFR 2.30' | |||
Scnzitivc Information Withhold from Public Dil.clocuro Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 13 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
FH-305 (ON SOUTH WALL OF FUEL HANDLING BUILDING) benzitr've Intarmatien lwilthela-trefm Public 6 seclozrUc Undcr 10 Cl-F- 2.31 | |||
nfom0tin Wthho-ld froqm. Public DEGIzclocu Scncti','c Under 10 CFR 2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 14 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
PA-205 (NORTH EAST CORNER OF EAST PEN) 6enziti~ Intorm~fat Gn Withheld tromF Public UAGizclozu Undcr 1U GFR 2.3'J | |||
SensziteicInfofrmation Withheld from Pub* lcDiGRclocu'rpc Undc-p-r 10-C-F.R :2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 15 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
DB-301 (MAIN ENTRANCE TO DIESEL BUILDING) | |||
Sensktic infeFrmationR Withhold fromA Publi6 Dicclocurc Wndcr 10 CFR 2.30 | |||
Sensfifivc I~formation Withheld from Public Dicc'eGUrc Under 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 16 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
DB-302 (IN DIESEL B ROOM) cncitive inforMafion vlitnnoia ffom uicocr W1UDIIC-8l~ nac i14 "p-m- 'Aiuu | |||
A genswtmve infFrmation W.~ithhomld fFrom. PulcDizc886locu Un~dc 10 GER 2.300 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 17 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
DB-305 (IN DIESEL A ROOM) | |||
Scn*;l.,, Is.rm..^tion Withhold f.rom PuI,,I3;68 u Undcr F'10 -FR2.30 | |||
Sensitov'c Ifnafor~ie Withhold fromA Public Dizclocuro Undcr 10 CFR 2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 18 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
IB-302 (NEAR MAIN FEEDWATER PUMPS) genszivei.'Informnation Withhold fromF PublM Dicclocurc Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 | |||
Scnzitivc Inf6Frmoti9n )ARAIthh-l fFrom Pulblic, Dkc6ocurbc Under 10 CER 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 19 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
IB-304 (NEAR MAIN FEEDWATER PUMPS) | |||
~cncItI~o inrormzition ~.":itnnoi~i Trom I-~uDIIo UIzci3zurc Under 10 WndeF 10 CFR 2.300 GFR 2.390 | |||
Sencitfive Inf8FRmation Withhold from Publie Diccloz6Urc UnRdc 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 20 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
IB-305 (IN CREP ROOMS) lim I r cnciiivc in~ormaiion '.'~.'iinnoi~i worn ruoiic uicciocurc un~cr U ur-r~ .~iuu | |||
S :ns;,,e In*fforatonA Withhold from Public Disl.urc Under I1 0 r"r 2., - | |||
OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 21 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
IB-313 (NEXT TO 1DB SWITCHGEAR ROOM) | |||
* AI*al I nI f | |||
* I iI bensitivc InAormatln W.:thheld ftrom [PUbDGIICuicicuo I lRdpr ndr 100 QFR FR2. | |||
2 RAO | |||
f | |||
* I Bw | |||
;cniestmv'c iromatlon vvivinflfleld oRAN I'DIIC uicizrc )U~ e 10acGFu 2.390 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 22 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
IB-314A (NEXT TO 1DB SWITCHGEAR ROOM) | |||
This door will not open with sandbags in place Sensitivc Inforlm... o Withheld from Publi,,Disocuer. | |||
. ndo. 10 CFR 2.3nn | |||
Secseive~ !fflnformion Withheld fromR Public Diselozurz Undcr 10 CER 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 23 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
CB-302 (NEAR CONTROL BUILDING ELEVATOR) iI E J * | |||
* A AAA | |||
ýCfieASRvW r | |||
* i iI "MA-9 trM-1-'unlicF In~RmotlonR .'iffF~A nd r | |||
'uu-F-P 10c~zr P2 | |||
b8..fl'!i'W8 IRflT3~3ifle WflflflMi1 fFGom PdEIJIIC Ui56IOSUFe un88F iU b.rIM z.d.3U OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 24 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
CB-301 (IN RELAY ROOM) gcnzitivc IneforEAmat ~ | |||
VwithholdE fErom PEuflhic Pico~r UndcrW W 40 1U~e 2.3U | |||
Scnsitive Informnation Withhold fromF Public DiG rc We nder 10 CFR 2.390 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 25 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D) | |||
CB-326 (NEXT TO I&C SHOP) 6essmtive InAormatlen vvIMtnniafe HErcm1 I-'UDIIC~ ueF WAcicur iu 6,1-K- .6iu}} | |||
Revision as of 14:12, 4 November 2019
| ML13240A005 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer |
| Issue date: | 08/22/2013 |
| From: | Gatlin T South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RC-13-0126 | |
| Download: ML13240A005 (32) | |
Text
p Sen*.utve IRformation Withheld from Public DiSclosure Under 10 CF*nR 2.390 Thomas D. Gatlin Vice-President Nuclear Operations (803) 345-4342 A SCANA COMPANY August 22, 2013 RC-1 3-0126 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Sir/Madam:
Subject:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-395 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY (SCE&G)
SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO NRC REQUEST FOR INFORMATION PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f) REGARDING THE FLOODING ASPECTS OF RECOMMENDATION 2.1 OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE REVIEW OF INSIGHTS FROM THE FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT
References:
- 1. NRC Letter, "Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident," March 12, 2012 [ML12053A340]
- 2. SCE&G to NRC, Flooding Reevaluation Results for Virgil C. Summer Unit 1 dated March 12, 2013 (RC-13-0038)
On March 12, 2012, the NRC issued Reference 1 to all power reactor licensees and holders of construction permits in active or deferred status. Enclosure 2 of Reference 1 requested that each licensee perform a reevaluation of external flooding sources and report the results in accordance with the NRC's prioritization plan. South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) submitted theflood reevaluation for V.C. Summer Unit 1 (VCSNS) in Reference 2. Reference 2 contains interim actions that SCE&G has taken or plans to take to address higher flooding hazards relative to the design basis until the integrated assessment is completed.
The enclosed table provides a list of the interim actions taken or planned to be taken as contained in Reference 2 along with additional supporting details and the dates by which they have or will be implemented. SCE&G commits to notify its NRR project manager prior to modifying these interim actions or completion dates.
This letter contains new regulatory commitments.
Attachment 111,Operations Administr-ativ" Procedure, GAP 109.1 new nlor..... " u,*."a dine- f Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" trans~mittd hcrcw~fith containq qsonsitiv0ifrmain WAhn scparatcd- from Attachmnent 111, this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled.
SR.n.te'- Information Withhold from Public Di*closure Undcr 10 CFR 2.390 Virgil C.Summer Station . Post Office Box 88 *Jenkinsville, SC.29065 . F(803) 941-9776
Scnsitive I nfor--atiot n Withhold from Public Disclcu-re Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR- 2-01098 RC-1 3-0126 Page 2 of 2 Should you have any questions concerning the content of this letter, please contact Bruce L.
Thompson at (803) 931-5042.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on 'Thomas D. Gatlin BQ/TDG/mm Attachments:
I. List of Regulatory Commitments II. Reevaluation Report Interim Action Commitments Ill. Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" Redacted Version c: (without attachments unless noted)
K. B. Marsh S. A. Byrne J. B. Archie N. S. Carns J. H. Hamilton J. W. Williams W. M. Cherry E. J. Leeds V. M. McCree (w/attachments)
R. E. Martin (w/attachments)
NRC Resident Inspector K. M. Sutton NSRC RTS (CR-12-01098)
File (815.07)
PRSF (RC-13-0126)
AMachmcnt 111, Opcrations Ad-Minic-trativc Proccduro, GAP 109.1 now E..ncls uer E "Gu-delines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" tranSMitted her.with
, ontains sensitie i.formation. Whcn scparated from Attachmcent '11,this transmittal document is dccontrOllcd.
SenSiti':o Infora-F-tiOn Withhold from Public Disclosur!e Under 10 CFR 2.390
enw:i.*. .. F..matio, Wit;hho9*d* fro^m Pub.lic DilclosGur@ Under In C*FR 2.300 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 1 of 1 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT I LIST OF REGULATORY COMMITMENTS The following table identifies those actions committed to by SCE&G, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station in this document and Reference 2. Please direct questions regarding these commitments to Mr. Bruce L. Thompson, Manager, Nuclear Licensing, (803) 931-5042.
COMMITMENT Due Date/Event Update Station procedures to include 10 year surveys of the February 28, 2014 North Berm elevation.
Initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the February 28, 2014 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm.
Perform Preventative Maintenance (PM) inspections for Perform Quarterly Per clearance of underground drainage pathways. the PM Program VCSNS to maintain procedure OAP-1 09.1 for the sand bag Until a permanent placement until a permanent solution is implemented. solution is implemented Atta.hm.nt 111,Operations Administrative Precoduro, GAP 108.1 noW .. c.ourc En"Guidelines for S-andb1-agging Ground-Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains sensitive inomto.When separated from Attachment 111. this transmittal documcnt is dcconrollod bensorvin O OFM a110n wInni rFRLI-ro-M r.U-nic- unsriosurc undecr 10u C.rI F- .90
Sensit'ive Informtion Withhold from P-blic D-clos'ure Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment II Page 1 of 3 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT II Reevaluation Report Interim Action Commitments The following Condition Reports (CRs) were prepared in response to the finding of the Flood Hazard Reevaluation.
CR-12-04133 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.1)
During review of site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in response to Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, the Flooding Walkdown Team identified discrepancies related to site dams and embankments. The following was identified during the study of site topographical surveys performed as part of Fukushima Recommendation 2.1/2.3 response (Performed per PO# NU-02NN747697). The surveys were submitted with accuracy of 0.1 feet at the dam/berm profiles.
- The North Berm (DE-1) was identified as having local low points in crest at elevation 437.7 feet.
- The SW Pond North Dam (DE-2) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.1 feet.
- The SW Pond East Dam (DE-3) was identified as having low points in crest elevation of 437.5 feet.
FSAR Section 2.10 states that the crest of the North Berm, SW Pond North Dam, and SW Pond East Dam are all at elevation 438.0 feet. The 438.0 feet elevation was determined to be sufficient to protect the site's Seismic Category 1 structures from coincident wind-wave activity along with PMF (probable maximum flood of Frees Creek). The maximum wave run-up on the North Berm is 436.6 feet (Reference FSAR Section 2.4.3.6) and the maximum wave run-up for the Service Water Pond North and East dam was determined to be elevation 435.9 feet (Reference DC02230-005 Rev 1).
Although the Dam/Berm crest elevations are below 438.0 feet, there is still available physical margin between the current Dam/Berm crest elevation and the maximum wave run-up elevation.
It is also noted that the SW Pond North and East dam require protection against wind-wave activity generated in the SW Pond. The maximum elevation of wind-wave run-up generated in the SW Pond is 433.6 feet, which is bounded for the SW Pond North and East dam by the wind-wave activity from Monticello Reservoir.
Operations Administrative Proredurc, 0pAP 10-9.1 ntem Enlocsurem E "Guidclnc fRs Attac~hment 111, Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" tra;R~_n"emtd_ herewith contains sensitive information. Whc separated from Attachment !"l,thfis transmittal document is decontrolled.
Sensitive Information Withhold from Publirc Discdos'-r Undcr 10 CFR 2.390
Scnsitive Inform.tion Withhold fromn Publi DicSlo'U:r Under 10 CFR 2.390 Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment I Page 2 of 3 The available physical margins are as follows:
" North Berm - (437.7 feet - 436.6 feet) = 1.1 feet
" SW Pond North Dam - (437.1 feet - 435.9 feet) = 1.2 feet SW Pond East Dam - (437.5 feet - 435.9 feet) = 1.6 feet A Technical Work Record was written to include a more detailed evaluation of the design bases of the top elevation of the dams and embankments and their current margin compared to design bases requirements.
The impact of the current low-point elevations is a reduction in margin. The probable cause of the event was original construction of the North Berm and SW Pond Dams and West Embankment. A contributing factor is potential erosion and settlement of the earthen structures.
Actions Planned:
Action 1 in this CR has been initiated for Design Engineering to provide necessary information for procedural updates to begin 10 year elevation surveys of the North Berm. (Updates to CV-01, CMP-700.001, ES-400 will be reviewed for Applicability.) Take elevation measurements at 50 foot intervals along crest of North Berm. Continue measurements from the Circulating Water Intake Structure to the Monticello/Fairfield Dam for at least two 50 foot intervals on the dam.
Action 2 has been initiated to initiate Preventative Maintenance (PM) Task to perform the 10-Year Elevation Surveys of the North Berm.
Implementation Date:
2/28/2014 CR-I 2-03267 (Flooding Reevaluation Report Reference 4.4.2)
During review of the site flood protection design in accordance with NEI 12-07a, in support of Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 2.3-Flooding, a discrepancy was noted between the FSAR stated site maximum ponding level and the Nuclear Safety Related building flood protection features.
The probable cause of the condition appears to be facility design errors during original plant licensing and construction. The original flood protection analysis to protect site from local intense precipitation (LIP) was deemed inadequate by NRC as documented in FSAR Question 371.1. The NRC position was that the subsurface storm water drainage system design did not adequately consider blockage in original analysis. The NRC requested the site re-analyze the effects of LIP on site flooding considering partial or total impairment of the subsurface drainage system; and that if only partial impairment is assumed the site must demonstrate it as a conservative assumption.
In response, the site revised the FSAR section 2.4.3.1.3 to provide information from an analysis for a 6-hour PMP assuming total impairment of the subsurface drainage system, using only Attachmcnt 111,Opcrations Administrative Proccdurc, OAP 109.1 new En.co'-Sr E "Guidclincs for SAndbagging Ground 1oeve, Plant Dears" transmitted herewith contafins scnsoithc inform~matin. Whon separated from Attachmcnt 111,this transmittal documcnt is decontrolled.
Snsitv" Information Withhold from Public Dis.losur. Undc.
.FR 10 2.390
Sensitvc intOrMatin Withhold troM Plublica DISCloSUrc Under 10 CFIR 2.3U Document Control Desk CR-1 2-01098 RC-1 3-0126 Attachment II Page 3 of 3 overland drainage flow. The overland flow analysis took into consideration the available site storage area up to elevation 436 feet along with the assumption that the road centerlines were at elevation 436 feet and bound the site. A weir flow was then assumed over the road crest and it was determined that during the 6-hour PMP the ponding elevation will not rise above elevation 436.15 feet. The value was greater than the original high ponding elevation of 435.4 feet when considering a functioning subsurface drainage system. The delta between the 436.15 feet and 435.4 feet elevation appears to have not been properly evaluated for the effect it could potentially have on plant equipment considering the Seismic Category 1 building door thresholds were at approximate elevation 436 feet. The potential for water infiltration into buildings, then migrating down to lower elevations via open passageways was not properly documented in the site design documentation. Additional analysis was performed as part of NTTF 2.1-Flooding Hazard Re-Evaluation and concluded that the actual site ponding elevation due to the design basis PMP event was 437.5 feet on the West Side of the Power Block and 436.5 feet on the East Side of the Power Block.
Interim Actions:
Immediate actions were required. At the time the CR was written, Security initiated additional checks for Protected Area (PA) manhole drainage. Patrol Officers were directed to inspect drainage manholes inside the PA to ensure no drainage issues. Civil Maintenance is currently performing these inspections following the below specific instructions for conducting an inspection:
General visual inspections are performed on each catch basin shown on drawing 743-001 for catch basin manhole inlet blockage as well as for potentially transportable materials in the immediate vicinity that could result in manhole blockage.
- Any blockages or debris on the catch basins grating should be removed during the inspections; this includes any rocks, plastic materials, or other debris. CRs are initiated as necessary to trim grass or other vegetation back to at least 6 inches clear all around the grating.
- If the debris cannot be removed by personnel during normal inspections, a new CR should be written to document the deficiency.
Operations has updated the Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-1 09.1 to include "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" in a new enclosure E. This new enclosure provides direction on when, where to, and how to install the available sandbags to protect power block structures during LIP event. Enclosure E also provides the storage location and proper storage condition of sandbags when not in use. The storage containers for the sandbags are maintained in a suitable storage location. The sandbags and containers have been pre-inspected and sealed for transport into the protected area for a timely deployment. The construction of sandbag revetment uses similar concepts to those used in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Field Manual.
Implementation Date:
The procurement of sandbags and revision to site procedures are complete.
Attachment 111,Operations Adminie-t-rmtatvo Perocdure, OAP 109.1 n~ewcocr En"Guidelines o Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" transmitted herewith coentains scnsftifcinfrmtin Whn scoarated from Attarhmcnt III, this transmittal decumcnt is decontrolled.
... .. A ......
tcnsIt.c intoratio Witlhho Iro rm 1Publlic n Isco lrlndcI .IU C--l Gt" *3
Fiqlriv .30raro "Ilaoi al s ra~
om i uiecioer
-q, I I 0 e I 4 u'.ii A AP* A AAA Document Control Desk CR-12-01098 RC-13-0126 Attachment III Page 1 of 26 VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION (VCSNS) UNIT I ATTACHMENT III Operations Administrative Procedure, OAP-109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelines for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" 2.390 Attac~hment 111,Operations Administrative Poroedure, 0-AP-t109.1 new Enclosure E "Guidelincs for Sandbagging Ground Level Plant Doors" transmitted hcrcwith contains sensitive inoraton hn separated from Attachment 111, thus transmittal document us decontrolled.
A ......
bensitivc information witnnewc from i-'ublig Ic Li-Scoure uncoer WULi-K 2.
F
- I II *D
~CflZITI'.~C inrcrmation WITflflOId worn I-'unhic uizcio~tim Undor iu uI-I-~ ~iuu OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 1 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS A. This Enclosure contains the following information:
- 1) Plant layout drawing showing Door Number and location of all ground level doors and passage ways to be sandbagged (21 locations).
- 2) Instructions for sandbagging a typical door.
- 3) A photograph of each of the doors (and passage ways) with the sandbags installed.
B. The photographs of the doors are grouped by building as follows:
- 1) Auxiliary Building.
- 2) Fuel Handling Building.
- 3) Diesel Building (and East Penetration area).
- 4) Intermediate Building.
- 5) Control Building.
C. It may be necessary to use more sandbags than are shown in these photographs in order to get a good seal on each door.
D.
NOTE E Sandbag containers have Security Seals on them which prevent the lids from being opened. In order to expedite bringing these containers into the Protected Area, the Security Seals must not be broken until the containers are inside the Protected Area.
E. Sandbags used for this procedure are stored on the Warehouse B loading dock in two yellow metal containers labeled "Sandbags - Flood Control".
Wifflold
ýCnietivo IRefintormzition-1 UM DwornH~ 1-uni ind 11U:
Iizcozur 2299~~.
ri.. --iiv-- n, 'mt.
.
f I Ii
~in.o Trom i-Uhcuicouc
- *o nc 0 F .
OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 2 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
PLANT LAYOUT AB-417A FHB Hallway PA-205 IB-302 CB-302 AB-418 FH-303 DB-301 IB-304 CB-301 AB-419 FH-304 DB-302 IB-305 CB-326 AB-406 (rollup) FH-305 DB-305 IB-313 AB-407 IB-314A Scnsitevc lnfcrmntien Withheld from Public Disclcur WndeFr110 GPR 2.399
Sen;i.;, Inform.ation Withheld fr-lmi Publi. DI';I1 1 ,, II.,r 40 CFR 2.3 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 3 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
TYPICAL METHOD TO INSTALL SANDBAGS ON A DOOR
- 1) Lay plastic sheet on floor to seal bottom edge of door.
- 2) Stack sandbags on top of plastic sheet until top of stack is at least 18 inches above the finished floor grade.
f .....
s ntr~mntion 1nitf.
A 'Itflfloeitd tromR Punhic DIzcIozure UL-JdeF QUUI- 2 "On
Se ;s;tiv. I1nferMot*8 Withhold Fr Publi* DI-)clo,,rc UndeF10* -R 2.300 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 4 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS STEPS TO INSTALL SANDBAGS ON TYPICAL DOOR (CONT'D)
- 3) Fold plastic sheet over top of upper layer of sandbags.
- 4) Place layer of sandbags on top of plastic sheet.
Seinnon ve Seitr;9Ma;io 1
f VVAnnoia wornA
- P-uniio uizciozure un i iI *.
.0 6cu O.-In
onIIRciTo8-RmAffion RIIRR Trom fmnnoi !1 ISE)IcioUr WUD uncre lid Fi--
P' .jl OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 5 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
AB-417A (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP) bensiti'.e I~flTOF'atIlB WIIRF18EIG Tr~ff ['IH81IC UflOF IIO3~F 4W &UI[ .4 A
f
- I l*
~iNPR'eIWRFrll intormrnion fWitflflcid [trom8 1ic~zr 40 UI-unacrF Feufhi 2.39n OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 6 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
AB-418 (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP)
This door will not open with sandbags in place.
ibenlZiTIv intorma1eF '.~IfflOI3 WRion traWBUIIG "uI6cI5Wrc na8W 11d "P-M -. 6
-;,,SoniiIf*ormAt*io WithhAld froml- Public Dic*:l r, I IUndor 1tF0 CF--R "2.00 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 7 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
AB-419 (FROM AB TO HOT MACHINE SHOP)
Sencitive Info-rmaion~A- Withholld fromPubic Dicclocu'rc ndr 0 FR2.
W R al e.F 19- Q F R 2. 2-A-Q
Noncitlrv Infor,-sAtisn Withhs-ld from Public Ui clozurc Undcr 1F 19 II, 2.399 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 8 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
AB-406 (AB ROLLUP DOOR)
I m I 6cszitive In)formation WitriHOEld fromF Public 0Ui6o8ozurc Undcr1e 10FGFR R 2.3
.0
benzstivc inWormmein from'8U~
ý.":itnnoi WUICuzizr nac iU "l-i- zzdW OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 9 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
AB-407 (NEXT TO AB ROLLUP DOOR)
~cnzItivc inrorm~iri~n vvitnnoia worn VUDIIC UI~CI3Cur3 unuor iu u~r. ~uu
genscive~ InfAorm;-AiA- Wiithhold fromf Publi Dire'oGUrc Under 10 CPR :2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 10 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
HALLWAY NEXT TO FUEL HANDLING BUILDING TRAIN BAY E~eneitwve Informfation Wimthhold fro.m Pub--lic- DWicciocuro~ Undcr 10 CFR 2.30
Scnsitivo Infeormi~tieo Withheld fromA Public DIzzGIEzurc UndeF 10 CFR 2.39 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 11 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
FH-303 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY)
Sensofitk ln*formti;n Withhold fro ,
Public Di*cI;Ulr Und.r 10 CFR 2.3.0
~cnznivc in~ormotion v':itnnoia from I-'UDIIC uicoi~zurc uncicr U ui-r~ ~~UU OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 12 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
FH-304 (IN STAIRWELL SOUTH OF TRAIN BAY)
S-en-tve Inf.orm;atio WAli.g.thho-ld from Pulblic Di"GI,,rI lUnder 10 GFR 2.30'
Scnzitivc Information Withhold from Public Dil.clocuro Undcr 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 13 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
FH-305 (ON SOUTH WALL OF FUEL HANDLING BUILDING) benzitr've Intarmatien lwilthela-trefm Public 6 seclozrUc Undcr 10 Cl-F- 2.31
nfom0tin Wthho-ld froqm. Public DEGIzclocu Scncti','c Under 10 CFR 2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 14 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
PA-205 (NORTH EAST CORNER OF EAST PEN) 6enziti~ Intorm~fat Gn Withheld tromF Public UAGizclozu Undcr 1U GFR 2.3'J
SensziteicInfofrmation Withheld from Pub* lcDiGRclocu'rpc Undc-p-r 10-C-F.R :2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 15 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
DB-301 (MAIN ENTRANCE TO DIESEL BUILDING)
Sensktic infeFrmationR Withhold fromA Publi6 Dicclocurc Wndcr 10 CFR 2.30
Sensfifivc I~formation Withheld from Public Dicc'eGUrc Under 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 16 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
DB-302 (IN DIESEL B ROOM) cncitive inforMafion vlitnnoia ffom uicocr W1UDIIC-8l~ nac i14 "p-m- 'Aiuu
A genswtmve infFrmation W.~ithhomld fFrom. PulcDizc886locu Un~dc 10 GER 2.300 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 17 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
DB-305 (IN DIESEL A ROOM)
Scn*;l.,, Is.rm..^tion Withhold f.rom PuI,,I3;68 u Undcr F'10 -FR2.30
Sensitov'c Ifnafor~ie Withhold fromA Public Dizclocuro Undcr 10 CFR 2.300 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 18 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
IB-302 (NEAR MAIN FEEDWATER PUMPS) genszivei.'Informnation Withhold fromF PublM Dicclocurc Undcr 10 CFR 2.30
Scnzitivc Inf6Frmoti9n )ARAIthh-l fFrom Pulblic, Dkc6ocurbc Under 10 CER 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 19 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
IB-304 (NEAR MAIN FEEDWATER PUMPS)
~cncItI~o inrormzition ~.":itnnoi~i Trom I-~uDIIo UIzci3zurc Under 10 WndeF 10 CFR 2.300 GFR 2.390
Sencitfive Inf8FRmation Withhold from Publie Diccloz6Urc UnRdc 10 CFR 2.30 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 20 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
IB-305 (IN CREP ROOMS) lim I r cnciiivc in~ormaiion '.'~.'iinnoi~i worn ruoiic uicciocurc un~cr U ur-r~ .~iuu
S :ns;,,e In*fforatonA Withhold from Public Disl.urc Under I1 0 r"r 2., -
OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 21 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
IB-313 (NEXT TO 1DB SWITCHGEAR ROOM)
- AI*al I nI f
- I iI bensitivc InAormatln W.:thheld ftrom [PUbDGIICuicicuo I lRdpr ndr 100 QFR FR2.
2 RAO
f
- I Bw
- cniestmv'c iromatlon vvivinflfleld oRAN I'DIIC uicizrc )U~ e 10acGFu 2.390 OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 22 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
IB-314A (NEXT TO 1DB SWITCHGEAR ROOM)
This door will not open with sandbags in place Sensitivc Inforlm... o Withheld from Publi,,Disocuer.
. ndo. 10 CFR 2.3nn
Secseive~ !fflnformion Withheld fromR Public Diselozurz Undcr 10 CER 2.30 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 23 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
CB-302 (NEAR CONTROL BUILDING ELEVATOR) iI E J *
- A AAA
ýCfieASRvW r
- i iI "MA-9 trM-1-'unlicF In~RmotlonR .'iffF~A nd r
'uu-F-P 10c~zr P2
b8..fl'!i'W8 IRflT3~3ifle WflflflMi1 fFGom PdEIJIIC Ui56IOSUFe un88F iU b.rIM z.d.3U OAP-109.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 24 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
CB-301 (IN RELAY ROOM) gcnzitivc IneforEAmat ~
VwithholdE fErom PEuflhic Pico~r UndcrW W 40 1U~e 2.3U
Scnsitive Informnation Withhold fromF Public DiG rc We nder 10 CFR 2.390 OAP-1 09.1 ENCLOSURE E PAGE 25 OF 25 REVISION 3 CHANGE F GUIDELINES FOR SANDBAGGING GROUND LEVEL PLANT DOORS (CONT'D)
CB-326 (NEXT TO I&C SHOP) 6essmtive InAormatlen vvIMtnniafe HErcm1 I-'UDIIC~ ueF WAcicur iu 6,1-K- .6iu