ML14364A350: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:E S-201 E x a mina t ion Outline Q ua li ty Checklist Form E S-2 0 1-2 Facil ity: Da t e of Examinat i on: In itials Item Task Descr i ption b. c;# a 1. a. Verify that the outl in e (s) fit (s) the approp ri ate model , in a ccord an ce with ES-401. 1 {l-ffJ, w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with /1 Al I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems , evolutions , or gener i c topics. /1 iCh 14. T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropr i ate. ;1 l fl" '11'1 N 2. a. Using Form ES-30 1-5 , verify that the proposed scenario sets c over the required number !\ of normal e volutio ns , i nstr ume n t and component fa ilur es , tec hni cal specifi cat io ns , 'b.-s and major transients. I M b. Assess whether th e re are en ough scen ario se ts (and spa r es) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule !\ L without compromising exam integrity , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significant l y modified scenario , that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201                                   Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                     Form ES-201-2 Facility:                                                                                       Date of Examination:
' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible , assess whether the outline(s) conform (s) with the qualitative  
Initials Item                                                     Task Description a    b.       c;#
;i R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendi x D. 3. a. Ve r ify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fo rm ES-30 1-2: (1) the o u t l ine(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form ;.._ I (2) ta sk r epet iti o n fr om the las t two NRC examin ati ons is within the limit s specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applica n ts' audit test(s) (4) the number of ne w or modified tasks meets or exceeds the m i ni mu ms specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path , low-power , emergency , and RCA tasks m e et the c riteria on the form. b. V eri fy that the administrative outline meets the c riter i a sp ec ified on Fo rm ES-301-1: (1) th e tasks are d i stributed a mong th e top ic s as sp eci fi e d on th e form A at least one task i s new or s i gnificantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC lice nsi ng exami nations c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the p roje cted n umbe r a nd mix '\ Ill'-of a ppl i c ants a nd ensure that no i tem s a re duplicated on subsequent day s. 4. a. Assess wh ether plant-specific prio ri ti es (i n clu d ing PRA and I PE i nsights) are co v ered t1 in the ap p ropriate exa m sections. G b. Assess wh e the r the 10 CFR 55.4 1/4 3 and 55.4 5 sam p l ing is appropriate. A E N C. Ensure t h at KIA im portance rat ings (exce pt for plant-specific priorit ie s) are at least 2.5. A N-E d. C heck for dupli ca t i on a nd overlap a m ong exam s e ctions. A R A e. Chec k the entire exam for balance of co ver age. j\ L t-/ f. Assess wheth er the exa m fi t s the appropriate job l evel (RO or SRO). 1\ ' a. Author "JA e-1 N_/?e/SJwS'/UU COG f_t U3  
1.
/1 I ( 6 llf b. Fac ility Reviewe r (*) ... J.-.t . ..,.-f-'/.oJ-.-p_  
w
//h. ./ 7P'f}l'( c. NR C Chief Examiner (#) _6 1 f"\1'-*.,FJ.:t.  
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 .
.711-'lt.----' 5{JIBPJ j:J,;.f pp /': ..1!'£...,?. d. NRC Supervisor f y ' , Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Co lumn " c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
1   {l- ffJ, R
* Not app li ca bl e for NR C-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28}}
I
: b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
                                                                                                                      /1 ~ Al T
T
: c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.                   /1 iCh 14.
E N      d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.             ;1 lfl" '11'1
                                                                                                                          ~
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number s
of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
                                                                                                                      !\            'b.-
I M     b . Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number
                                                                                                                            ~~
u         and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated
                                                                                                                      !\
T         from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0
                                                                                                                          ~ ~
: c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R         and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.                     ;i
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w                                                                                                                 ~
                                                                                                                          ~ ;.._
distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I         (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T         (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
                                                                                                                          ~ -~
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form                               A i~l at least one task is new or significantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
                                                                                                                                      ~
: c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                             '\    Ill'-
: 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.                                                                     t1    ~
                                                                                                                                      ~
G E
: b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                                   A     *~        ~
N E
C. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.           A     N-       ~*
R
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.                                                   A   ~        ~
A L
: e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                         j\   ~        ~
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).                                   1\   t-        ~*
                                                                                                                                          /
                                                                                                                          '
: a. Author "JA COG                      Print~ N_/?e/SJwS'/UU f_t U3 e-1~~ell-/            /1         -~'                        I     ~a~1
( 6 llf
: b. Facility Reviewer (*)           ~... J.-.t...,.- f-'/.oJ-.-p_ / / h .               ./ ~                              7P'f}l'(
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d . NRC Supervisor
_6 1 f"\1'-*.,FJ.:t. tf11r.(J..Z.. I~/ ~ f) ~~J(.-_ .711 -'lt.----'
                                  ~t!IIP!I' j:J,;.fpp ~I                / ' : ..1!'£...,?. ~./..&:
5{JIBPJ
                                                                                                                          ~}. ~,
f       y Note:                 # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
                                                                                                                            '
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28}}

Revision as of 17:22, 31 October 2019

2014 Braidwood Station Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML14364A350
Person / Time
Site: Braidwood  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/21/2014
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML14344A990 List:
References
ES-201-2 50-456/OL-14, 50-457/OL-14
Download: ML14364A350 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:

Initials Item Task Description a b. c;#

1.

w

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 .

1 {l- ffJ, R

I

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

/1 ~ Al T

T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. /1 iCh 14.

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. ;1 lfl" '11'1

~

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number s

of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

!\ 'b.-

I M b . Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number

~~

u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

A without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated

!\

T from the applicants' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0

~ ~

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. ;i
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w ~

~ ;.._

distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

~ -~

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form A i~l at least one task is new or significantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

~

c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. '\ Ill'-
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. t1 ~

~

G E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. A *~ ~

N E

C. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. A N- ~*

R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. A ~ ~

A L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. j\ ~ ~
f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). 1\ t- ~*

/

'

a. Author "JA COG Print~ N_/?e/SJwS'/UU f_t U3 e-1~~ell-/ /1 -~' I ~a~1

( 6 llf

b. Facility Reviewer (*) ~... J.-.t...,.- f-'/.oJ-.-p_ / / h . ./ ~ 7P'f}l'(
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d . NRC Supervisor

_6 1 f"\1'-*.,FJ.:t. tf11r.(J..Z.. I~/ ~ f) ~~J(.-_ .711 -'lt.----'

~t!IIP!I' j:J,;.fpp ~I / ' : ..1!'£...,?. ~./..&:

5{JIBPJ

~}. ~,

f y Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

'

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28