ML16076A061: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257
                                NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
  March 15, 2016  
                                                REGION II
                              245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200
Mr. Joseph W. Shea  
                                      ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority  
                                          March 15, 2016
1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C  
Mr. Joseph W. Shea
Vice President, Nuclear Licensing
Tennessee Valley Authority
1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:        NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN
                BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007,
                05000328/2016007
Dear Mr. Shea:
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP)
71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, issued November 29, 2013.
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function
as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review
of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.
During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with
Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the
3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:
        *    Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016
        *    Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to
support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor
Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during
the inspection.
The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide
the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.


Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801
J. Shea                                        2
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors
will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents
required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team
in the Region II Office prior to the inspection teams preparation week of May 2, 2016.
Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of
contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)
other applicable information.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections,
Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of
NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the
information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or
contact me at 404-997-4607.
                                                Sincerely,
                                                /RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/
                                                Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief
                                                Engineering Branch 1
                                                Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328
License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79
Enclosure:
Information Request for Sequoyah
  Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases
  Inspection
cc: Distribution via Listserv


SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007, 05000328/2016007
 
Dear Mr. Shea:


  The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah
_________________________                    SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE    FORM 665 ATTACHED
Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.  
OFFICE              RII:DRS        RII:DRS
Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection teamThis
SIGNATURE          RNP1          GKO FOR JHB1
inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP) 71111.21, "Component Design Bases Inspection," issued November 29, 2013.  
NAME                RPATTERSON    JBARTLEY
   
DATE                  3/ 15 /2016    3/ 15/2016    3/  /2016        3/ /2016      3/ /2016      3/ /2016      3/ /2016
The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function
E-MAIL COPY?          YES    NO  YES      NO    YES      NO    YES    NO      YES    NO    YES    NO    YES    NO
as designed and to support proper system operationThe inspection will also include a review of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.   
       
              INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION
                            COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on
CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and
    fires:
          a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk
              achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
          b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
2.  From your most recent PSA including external events and fires:
          a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW,
              and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
          b.  A list of the top 500 cutsets
3.  Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including
    human reliability worksheets for these items
4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since
    April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision
6List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow
    or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to
    rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and
    associated evaluations or calculations
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the
    stations corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment
    failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry
    Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013
8List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs)
    design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013
9List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred
    since April 1, 2013
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013
                                                                                          Enclosure


During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with  Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the  3-week onsite inspection.  The schedule is as follows:
                                            2
 
11. List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a
* Information-gathering visit:  Week of April 25 - 29, 2016
    description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if
* Onsite inspection:  Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016
    available) of your plans to address the issue(s)
The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as
risk-significant components and operator actions.  Information and documentation needed to support the inspection will also be identified.  Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic
    described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020
risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during the inspection.
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from
 
    April 1, 2013, to present
The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit.  Please provide
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems
the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016. 
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
J. Shea 2
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)
Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit.  The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases
required for inspection preparation.  The additional information should be available to the team in the Region II Office prior to the inspection team's preparation week of May 2, 2016. Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)
(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013
(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)
 
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)
other applicable information.
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its
    March 28, 2016)
enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses
ent System (ADAMS).  ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.  If you have any questions regarding the information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or
    size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)
contact me at 404-997-4607. 
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs
 
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with
      Sincerely,
    findings from previous CDBI, if applicable
      /RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/
30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating
      Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief        Engineering Branch 1
    Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures
      Division of Reactor Safety
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection
 
Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328 License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79
 
Enclosure: 
Information Request for Sequoyah 
  Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases  Inspection 
cc:  Distribution via Listserv
 
 
 
_________________________  SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE  FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS      SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1    NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY      DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/  15/2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 3/    /2016 E-MAIL COPY?    YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO      YES NO     
  Enclosure INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION  COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Please provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format on CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.).  The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and
hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. 
 
1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)
excluding external events and
fires:  a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by risk achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
 
b. A list of the top 500 cutsets
2. From your most recent PSA
including external events and fires:
a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA:  one sorted by RAW, and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance
 
b.  A list of the top 500 cutsets
3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including human reliability worksheets for these items
4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action
 
5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since  April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision
 
6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to
rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and associated evaluations or calculations
7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the station's corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment
failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry
Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013
8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs) design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013
9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred 
since April 1, 2013
10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013
 
 
11. List of equipment on the site's Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if  
available) of your plans to address the issue(s)  
12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020  
13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from
April 1, 2013, to present  
14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems  
 
15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report  
 
16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)  
17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases  
 
18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)  
 
19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013  
20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)  
 
21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)  
 
22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of   March 28, 2016)  
23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams  
 
24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses  


25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses
                                            3
32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection
26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2 size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)
34. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to the information-
27. Index and Legend for P&IDs
    gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)
 
29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with findings from previous CDBI, if applicable
30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures
31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection
 
32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection
33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)  
34. Contact information for a person to discu
ss PSA information prior to the information-gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:49, 30 October 2019

Notification of Sequoyah Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases Inspection - NRC Inspection Report 05000327/2016007, 05000328/2016007
ML16076A061
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/15/2016
From: Bartley J
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1
To: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML16076A061 (6)


See also: IR 05000327/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257

March 15, 2016

Mr. Joseph W. Shea

Vice President, Nuclear Licensing

Tennessee Valley Authority

1101 Market Street, LP 3D-C

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT: NOTIFICATION OF SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT - COMPONENT DESIGN

BASES INSPECTION - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000327/2016007,

05000328/2016007

Dear Mr. Shea:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection (CDBI) at your Sequoyah

Nuclear Station during the weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016.

Mr. Robert Patterson, a Reactor Inspector in Region II, will lead the inspection team. This

inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspection procedure (IP)

71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, issued November 29, 2013.

The inspection will evaluate the capability of risk-significant/low margin components to function

as designed and to support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review

of selected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications.

During a telephone conversation on March 14, 2016, Mr. Patterson confirmed with

Ms. Rebecca Travis of your staff, arrangements for an information-gathering site visit and the

3-week onsite inspection. The schedule is as follows:

  • Information-gathering visit: Week of April 25 - 29, 2016
  • Onsite inspection: Weeks of May 9 - 13, May 23 - 27, and June 13 - 17, 2016

The purpose of the information-gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identify

risk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to

support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudolph Bernhard, a Region II Senior Reactor

Analyst, will support Mr. Patterson during the information-gathering visit to review probabilistic

risk assessment data and identify risk-significant components, which will be examined during

the inspection.

The enclosure lists documents needed prior to the information-gathering visit. Please provide

the referenced information to the Region II Office by April 4, 2016.

J. Shea 2

Additional documents will be requested during the information-gathering visit. The inspectors

will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying only those documents

required for inspection preparation. The additional information should be available to the team

in the Region II Office prior to the inspection teams preparation week of May 2, 2016.

Mr. Patterson will also discuss the following inspection support administrative details:

(1) availability of knowledgeable plant engineering and licensing personnel to serve as points of

contact during the inspection, (2) method of tracking inspector requests during the inspection,

(3) licensee computer access, (4) working space, (5) arrangements for site access, and (6)

other applicable information.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 2.390, Public Inspections,

Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of

NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is

accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public

Electronic Reading Room).

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding the

information requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Patterson at 404-997-4667 or

contact me at 404-997-4607.

Sincerely,

/RA: Geoffrey Ottenberg for/

Jonathan H. Bartley, Chief

Engineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos.: 50-327, 50-328

License Nos.: DPR-77, DPR-79

Enclosure:

Information Request for Sequoyah

Nuclear Plant - Component Design Bases

Inspection

cc: Distribution via Listserv

_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED

OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRS

SIGNATURE RNP1 GKO FOR JHB1

NAME RPATTERSON JBARTLEY

DATE 3/ 15 /2016 3/ 15/2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016 3/ /2016

E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

INFORMATION REQUEST FOR SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR STATION

COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Please provide the information electronically in .pdf files, Excel, or other searchable format on

CDROM (or FTP site, SharePoint, etc.). The CDROM (or Web site) should be indexed and

hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.

1. From your most recent probabilistic safety analysis (PSA) excluding external events and

fires:

a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by risk

achievement worth (RAW), and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance

b. A list of the top 500 cutsets

2. From your most recent PSA including external events and fires:

a. Two risk rankings of components from your site-specific PSA: one sorted by RAW,

and the other sorted by Birnbaum Importance

b. A list of the top 500 cutsets

3. Risk ranking of operator actions from your site-specific PSA sorted by RAW, including

human reliability worksheets for these items

4. List of time-critical operator actions with a brief description of each action

5. List of Emergency and Abnormal Operating Procedures revised (significant) since

April 1, 2013, with a brief description of each revision

6. List of components with low design margins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow

or pressure, diesel generator close to design-required output, heat exchangers close to

rated design heat removal, and motor-operated valve risk-margin rankings, etc.), and

associated evaluations or calculations

7. List of station operating experience evaluations/reviews performed and documented in the

stations corrective action program for industry events and safety-related equipment

failures/vulnerabilities (as communicated by NRC Generic Communications, Industry

Communications, 10 CFR Part 21 Notifications) since April 1, 2013

8. List and brief description of safety-related structures, systems, or components (SSCs)

design modifications implemented since April 1, 2013

9. List and brief description of common-cause component failures that have occurred

since April 1, 2013

10. List and brief description of operability evaluations completed since April 1, 2013

Enclosure

2

11. List of equipment on the sites Station Equipment Reliability Issues List, including a

description of the reason(s) why each component is on that list, and summaries (if

available) of your plans to address the issue(s)

12. List and brief description of equipment currently in degraded or nonconforming status as

described in Regulatory Issue Summary 05-020

13. List and reason for equipment classified in maintenance rule (a)(1) status from

April 1, 2013, to present

14. Copies of system descriptions (or the design basis documents) for safety-related systems

15. Copy of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

16. Copy of Technical Specification(s)

17. Copy of Technical Specifications Bases

18. Copy of Selected Licensee Commitment Manual(s)

19. List and brief description of Root Cause Evaluations performed since April 1, 2013

20. In-service Testing Program Procedure(s)

21. Corrective Action Program Procedure(s)

22. One-line diagram of electrical plant (electronic and full size - hard copy week of

March 28, 2016)

23. Index and legend for electrical plant one-line diagrams

24. Primary AC calculation(s) for safety-related buses

25. Primary DC calculation(s) for safety-related buses

26. Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) for safety-related systems (electronic and 1/2

size - hard copy week of March 28, 2016)

27. Index and Legend for P&IDs

28. Copy of Operability Determination procedure(s)

29. Copies of corrective action documents (i.e. condition reports (CRs)) associated with

findings from previous CDBI, if applicable

30. Index (procedure number, title, and current revision) of station Emergency Operating

Procedures, Abnormal Operating Procedures, and Annunciator Response Procedures

31. Copy of any self-assessments performed in preparation for this inspection

3

32. List of any PIPs generated in preparation for this inspection

33. Copies of PIPs generated from previous CDBI (2013)

34. Contact information for a person to discuss PSA information prior to the information-

gathering trip (name, title, phone number, and e-mail address)