ML16099A305: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 April 8, 2016 Mr. Paul Fessler Chief Nuclear Officer DTE Energy Company Fermi 2 - 210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION; INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007 Dear Mr. Fessler: On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21. The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review. The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can be accomplished with minimal impact.   The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The current inspection schedule is as follows:   Onsite weeks: August 1 5, 2016; August 15 19, 2016; and August 29 September 2, 2016. The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 29, 2016, as discussed in the enclosure.    
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
P. Fessler -2- Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the inspection. It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups: The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities. This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016. By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of approximately 20 components.   The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are generated.   The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.   In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
                            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
P. Fessler -3- inspection in the NRcomponent of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely, /RA/   Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-341 License No. NPF-43 Enclosure:  Information Request for Component Design     Bases Inspection cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
                                                REGION III
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION Enclosure Inspection Report: 05000341/2016007 Inspection Dates: August 1 5, 2016; August 15 19, 2016; and August 29 September 2, 2016. Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, Lead Inspector: Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS 630-829-9739 Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in eferably on some portable electronic media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology. 1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable). 2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. 3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA. 4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency. 5. 6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job performance measures. 7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures. 8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
                                    2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 2 9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if available. 10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal). 11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was determined. 12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the PSA). 13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category for the last 3 years. 14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable). 15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years. 16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 years at your facility. 17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years. 18. List of open operability evaluations. 19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming. 20. Current management and engineering organizational chart. 21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements Manual. 22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic copies are preferred). 23. (electronic copies are preferred).  
                                          LISLE, IL 60532-4352
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION 3 II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office during the week of July 25 29, 2016). This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations, condition reports, and maintenance history). 1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each of the selected components for the last 6 years. 2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of preventive maintenance activities. 3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings, engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded from this request] 4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components. 5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes, associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications. 6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable. 7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable. 8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected components, if applicable. 9. -service testing, other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate results, etc.). 10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with the selected components and selected scenarios. 11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective action documents generated in preparation for the inspection. 12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for example:
                                            April 8, 2016
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.   Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc. Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan flows, etc. Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included. 13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years. III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected components) 1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of July 25 29, 2016. 2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected components during the three on-site inspection weeks. 3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies). 4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies). IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection 1. questions or queries during this inspection. 2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection to each team member). 3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks): Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report; Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable); Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and Vendor manuals. If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.  
Mr. Paul Fessler
  P. Fessler -3- component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely, /RA/   Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector Engineering Branch 2 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-341 License No. NPF-43 Enclosure:  Information Request for Component Design     Bases Inspection cc: Distribution via LISTSERV DISTRIBUTION: Kimyata MorganButler RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Darrell Roberts Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRPIII DRSIII Jim Clay Carmen Olteanu     ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305 Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII NAME NFeliz-Adorno:cl    DATE 04/08/16   OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Chief Nuclear Officer
DTE Energy Company
Fermi 2 - 210 NOC
6400 North Dixie Highway
Newport, MI 48166
SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN
              NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;
              INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007
Dear Mr. Fessler:
On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection
will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21.
The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation
of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The
components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office
preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating
experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.
The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request
would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew
to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team
will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can
be accomplished with minimal impact.
The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC
inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The
current inspection schedule is as follows:
    Onsite weeks:     August 1 - 5, 2016;
                        August 15 - 19, 2016; and
                        August 29 - September 2, 2016.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016,
as discussed in the enclosure.
 
P. Fessler                                       -2-
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
        The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
        This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016.
        By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
        approximately 20 components.
        The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our
        in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations
        associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead
        inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office
        preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support
        the inspection.
        The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific
        reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on
        August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or
        questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as
        the documents are generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the
lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control
Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control
Number.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public
Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy
of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public
 
P. Fessler                               -3-
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                          Sincerely,
                                          /RA/
                                          Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector
                                          Engineering Branch 2
                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-341
License No. NPF-43
Enclosure:
   Information Request for Component Design
    Bases Inspection
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
 
      REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
Inspection Report:             05000341/2016007
Inspection Dates:               August 1 - 5, 2016;
                                August 15 - 19, 2016; and
                                August 29 - September 2, 2016.
Inspection Procedure:           IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection
Lead Inspector:                 Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS
                                630-829-9739
                                Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov
  I.   Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week
      The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate
      inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
      the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in
      pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
      media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive
      names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists
      should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has
      knowledge of light water reactor technology.
          1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety
                Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum
                Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).
          2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early
                Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement
                Worth.
          3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
          4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
                contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.
          5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
          6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
                performance measures.
          7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.
          8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
                requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
                description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
                                                                                          Enclosure
 
REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
  9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if
      available.
  10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations
      with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or
      pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers
      close to rated design heat removal).
  11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
      (identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and
      Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was
      determined.
  12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering
      or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
      PSA).
  13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category
      for the last 3 years.
  14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
  15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.
  16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the
      last 5 years at your facility.
  17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
      issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.
  18. List of open operability evaluations.
  19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.
  20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
  21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
      Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
      Manual.
  22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic
      copies are preferred).
  23. Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (electronic copies are preferred).
                                          2
 
    REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be
    Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office
    during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016).
    This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
    provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
    condition reports, and maintenance history).
        1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each
            of the selected components for the last 6 years.
        2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with
            each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of
            preventive maintenance activities.
        3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
            previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and
            also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,
            engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded
            from this request]
        4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
            Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.
        5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
            associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
            descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
            only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
        6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with
            each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.
        7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
            selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
        8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
            components, if applicable.
        9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
            last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other
            vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate
            results, etc.).
        10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with
            the selected components and selected scenarios.
        11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
            action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
        12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for
            example:
                                                3
 
        REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
                  Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.
                  Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.
                  Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan
                    flows, etc.
                Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
            13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.
  III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected
        components)
            1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections
                and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The
                lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the
                week of July 25 - 29, 2016.
            2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected
                components during the three on-site inspection weeks.
            3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).
            4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies).
  IV.   Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
            1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
                questions or queries during this inspection.
            2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
                status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the
                inspection to each team member).
            3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):
                  Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;
                  Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
                  Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
                  Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
                                                    4
 
P. Fessler                                                                 -3-
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)
component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
                                                                          Sincerely,
                                                                          /RA/
                                                                          Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector
                                                                          Engineering Branch 2
                                                                          Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-341
License No. NPF-43
Enclosure:
   Information Request for Component Design
    Bases Inspection
cc: Distribution via LISTSERV
DISTRIBUTION:
Kimyata MorganButler
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Cynthia Pederson
Darrell Roberts
Richard Skokowski
Allan Barker
Carole Ariano
Linda Linn
DRPIII
DRSIII
Jim Clay
Carmen Olteanu
ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305
    Publicly Available                       Non-Publicly Available                       Sensitive                 Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
  OFFICE             RIII                                 RIII                           RIII                               RIII
  NAME               NFeliz-Adorno:cl
   DATE               04/08/16
                                                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
}}
}}

Revision as of 21:06, 30 October 2019

Request for Information for an NRC Triennial Baseline Component Design Bases Inspection; Inspection Report 05000341/2016007
ML16099A305
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2016
From: Nestor Feliz-Adorno
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Fessler P
DTE Energy
References
IR 2016007
Download: ML16099A305 (8)


See also: IR 05000341/2016007

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210

LISLE, IL 60532-4352

April 8, 2016

Mr. Paul Fessler

Chief Nuclear Officer

DTE Energy Company

Fermi 2 - 210 NOC

6400 North Dixie Highway

Newport, MI 48166

SUBJECT: FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 - REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN

NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION;

INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2016007

Dear Mr. Fessler:

On August 1, 2016, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial

baseline Component Design Bases Inspection at Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. This inspection

will be performed in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure 71111.21.

The Component Design Bases Inspection focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation

of risk-significant components associated with one or more accident scenario or systems. The

components to be reviewed during this baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office

preparation week that occurs prior to the first onsite inspection week. In addition, operating

experience issues, associated with the component samples, will also be selected for review.

The inspection team may request scenarios to be performed on the simulator. This request

would require support from your simulator staff to validate scenarios, simulator time, and a crew

to perform the actions which would most likely occur during the second onsite week. The team

will work closely with your staff early on during the inspection process to ensure this activity can

be accomplished with minimal impact.

The inspection will include 3 weeks onsite. The inspection team will consist of 6 NRC

inspectors, of which 5 will focus on engineering/maintenance and 1 on operations. The

current inspection schedule is as follows:

Onsite weeks: August 1 - 5, 2016;

August 15 - 19, 2016; and

August 29 - September 2, 2016.

The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016,

as discussed in the enclosure.

P. Fessler -2-

Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown

that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the

licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive

inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the

inspection.

It is important that all of these documents are up-to-date and complete in order to minimize the

number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the onsite portions of

the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead

inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:

The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.

This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than June 13, 2016.

By June 24, 2016, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of

approximately 20 components.

The second group of documents requested is those items needed to support our

in-office preparation activities. This set of documents, including the calculations

associated with the initial selected components, should be provided to the lead

inspector at the Regional Office no later than July 18, 2016. During the in-office

preparation activities, the team may identify additional information needed to support

the inspection.

The last group includes the additional information above as well as plant specific

reference material. This information should be available to the team onsite on

August 1, 2016. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or

questions developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as

the documents are generated.

The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Néstor J. Féliz Adorno. We understand that our

licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Jason Haas of your organization. If there are any

questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact the

lead inspector at 630-829-9739 or via e-mail at Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject

to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information

collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control

Number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required

to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the

requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control

Number.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public

Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding, of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy

of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public

P. Fessler -3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-341

License No. NPF-43

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design

Bases Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Inspection Report: 05000341/2016007

Inspection Dates: August 1 - 5, 2016;

August 15 - 19, 2016; and

August 29 - September 2, 2016.

Inspection Procedure: IP 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection

Lead Inspector: Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS

630-829-9739

Nestor.Feliz-Adorno@nrc.gov

I. Information Requested Prior to the Onsite Information Gathering/Inspection Week

The following information is requested by June 13, 2016, or sooner, to facilitate

inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call

the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in

pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic

media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD). The portable electronic media should contain descriptive

names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in lists

should contain enough information to be easily understood by someone who has

knowledge of light water reactor technology.

1. Risk-ranking of top 250 components from your site specific Probabilistic Safety

Analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk-Achievement Worth. Include values for Birnbaum

Importance, Risk-Reduction Worth, and Fussell-Veseley (as applicable).

2. Risk-ranking of top 100 containment-related components (i.e., Large Early

Release Frequency) from your site specific PSA sorted by Risk-Achievement

Worth.

3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.

4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that

contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency.

5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.

6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job

performance measures.

7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures.

8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information

requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative

description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).

Enclosure

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

9. Electronic copy of the site Individual Plant Examination of External Events, if

available.

10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations

with low design margins, (e.g., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or

pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers

close to rated design heat removal).

11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction

(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the Motor-Operated Valve and

Air-Operated Valve Programs. Identify the basis for how the margin was

determined.

12. List of high-risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering

or expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the

PSA).

13. Structures, systems, and components in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1) category

for the last 3 years.

14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).

15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last 3 years.

16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the

last 5 years at your facility.

17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design

issues initiated/completed in the last 5 years.

18. List of open operability evaluations.

19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/non-conforming.

20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.

21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical

Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements

Manual.

22. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (electronic

copies are preferred).

23. Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (electronic copies are preferred).

2

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

II. Information Requested (for the approximate 20 selected components) to be

Available by July 18, 2016, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional office

during the week of July 25 - 29, 2016).

This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if

provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,

condition reports, and maintenance history).

1. List of condition reports (i.e., corrective action documents) associated with each

of the selected components for the last 6 years.

2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with

each of the selected components for the last 10 years. Identify frequency of

preventive maintenance activities.

3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not

previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and

also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,

engineering requests, and vendor letters). [Pipe stress calculations are excluded

from this request]

4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or

Training Lesson Plans associated with each of the selected components.

5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,

associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a

descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list

only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.

6. Copies of operability evaluations (open/closed for last 3 years) associated with

each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if applicable.

7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the

selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.

8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected

components, if applicable.

9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for

last 3 years (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing, other

vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and leak rate

results, etc.).

10. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with

the selected components and selected scenarios.

11. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective

action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.

12. Copy of latest completed tests and surveillances for each component, for

example:

3

REQUEST FOR INFORAMTION - COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION

Pumps: comprehensive test, quarterly test, flow balance, etc.

Valves: stroke time testing, diagnostic testing, leak testing, interlocks, etc.

Heat Exchangers/room coolers: thermal performance, clean/inspect, fan

flows, etc.

Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.

13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last 2 years.

III. Additional Information to be Provided on August 1, 2016, Onsite (for final selected

components)

1. During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections

and may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The

lead inspector will provide a list of the additional information needed during the

week of July 25 - 29, 2016.

2. Schedule of any testing/maintenance activities to be conducted on the selected

components during the three on-site inspection weeks.

3. One complete set of Piping and Instrumentation Drawings (paper copies).

4. Major one line electrical drawings (AC and DC) and key diagrams (paper copies).

IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection

1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams

questions or queries during this inspection.

2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the

status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the

inspection to each team member).

3. Reference materials. (make available if needed during all onsite weeks):

Individual Plant Examination/Probabilistic Risk Assessment Report;

Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);

Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and

Vendor manuals.

If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.

4

P. Fessler -3-

inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)

component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html

(the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Néstor J. Féliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 50-341

License No. NPF-43

Enclosure:

Information Request for Component Design

Bases Inspection

cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

DISTRIBUTION:

Kimyata MorganButler

RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource

RidsNrrPMFermi2 Resource

RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource

Cynthia Pederson

Darrell Roberts

Richard Skokowski

Allan Barker

Carole Ariano

Linda Linn

DRPIII

DRSIII

Jim Clay

Carmen Olteanu

ADAMS Accession Number ML16099A305

Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive

To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy

OFFICE RIII RIII RIII RIII

NAME NFeliz-Adorno:cl

DATE 04/08/16

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY