ML18153A040: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 8, 1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: | {{#Wiki_filter:e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 8, 1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 96-357 Attention: Document Control Desk NL&OS/JBL R1 Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-280 50-281 50-338 50-339 License No. DPR-32 DPR-37 NPF-4 NPF-7 Gentlemen: | ||
Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 | VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08, "THERMO-LAG 330-1 FIRE BARRIERS" By letter dated July 2, 1996, the NRC requested that Virginia Electric and Power Company provide plant-specific responses to Question 1.d of the NRC's request for additional information letter dated December 28, 1994. Specifically, the NRC requested Virginia Electric and Power Company to confirm that the Thermo-Lag material used at Surry and North Anna Power Stations to meet NRC requirements or licensing commitments are representative of the population of Thermo-Lag samples that were tested by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). | ||
* Virginia Electric and Power Company responded to the NRC's December 28, 1994 request for additional information by letters dated March 28, 1995, July 26, 1995, and December 15, 1995. The December 15, 1995 letter provided technically justified exemption requests for use of Thermo-Lag as radiant energy shields inside the containments at North Anna and Surry. These exemption requests are still pending review and approval by the NRC. | |||
* Virginia Electric and Power Company responded to the NRC's December 28, 1994 request for additional information by letters dated March 28, 1995, July 26, 1995, and December 15, 1995. The December 15, 1995 letter provided technically justified exemption requests for use of Thermo-Lag as radiant energy shields inside the containments at North Anna and Surry. These exemption requests are still pending review and approval by the NRC. Upon receipt of the NRC's July 2, 1996 request for additional information, Virginia Electric and Power Company reviewed the results of the NEI Generic Chemical Testing Program for Thermo-Lag material and the Company's records of purchased Thermo-Lag material for use at Surry and North Anna. Based on our review, we have determined that the results of the industry test program provides a firm basis to conclude that the chemical composition of the Thermo-Lag used at North Anna and Surry Power Stations is consistent with that tested by NUCON International, Inc. for the NEI effort. Virginia Electric and Power Company finds that the high degree of chemical r-~~9~6~0"\(a:,:1.,4.--,.0"0~3~4~9~6:;;;o--;;;;;ao=-a=------ | Upon receipt of the NRC's July 2, 1996 request for additional information, Virginia Electric and Power Company reviewed the results of the NEI Generic Chemical Testing Program for Thermo-Lag material and the Company's records of purchased Thermo-Lag material for use at Surry and North Anna. Based on our review, we have determined that the results of the industry test program provides a firm basis to conclude that the chemical composition of the Thermo-Lag used at North Anna and Surry Power Stations is consistent with that tested by NUCON International, Inc. for the NEI effort. Virginia Electric and Power Company finds that the high degree of chemical r-~~9~6~0"\(a:,:1.,4.--,.0"0~3~4~9~6:;;;o--;;;;;ao=-a=------ | ||
PDR ADOCK 05000280 / p PDR I consistency exhibited adequately demonstrates that our materials are equivalent to the materials tested. The results of the material tests were provided to the NRC by letter from NEI dated October 3, 1995. This should close any questions regarding the material composition and consistency of Thermo-Lag materials used at Surry and North Anna as communicated in the | PDR ADOCK 05000280 / | ||
-Nuclear cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W. Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. R. D. McWhorter NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station | p PDR I | ||
consistency exhibited adequately demonstrates that our materials are equivalent to the materials tested. The results of the material tests were provided to the NRC by letter from NEI dated October 3, 1995. This should close any questions regarding the material composition and consistency of Thermo-Lag materials used at Surry and North Anna as communicated in the 1O CFR 50.54(f) letters. | |||
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us. | |||
Very tJuly yours, | |||
~?.~"'-' | |||
James P. O'Hanlon Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W. | |||
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. R. D. McWhorter NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station | |||
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ) | |||
) | |||
COUNTY OF HENRICO ) | |||
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by J. P. O'Hanlon, who is Senior Vice President - | |||
Nuclear, of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute | |||
:!t and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of-his knowledge and Acknowledged before me this £~day of .!/JLA!uJI.: , 199..k.. | |||
My Commission Expires: ./J?41 3 ( ,c-:{9']]{. | |||
(SEAL)}} | |||
Revision as of 23:53, 20 October 2019
| ML18153A040 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry, North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1996 |
| From: | Ohanlon J VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| 96-357, GL-92-08, GL-92-8, NL&OS-JBL-R1, NUDOCS 9608140034 | |
| Download: ML18153A040 (3) | |
Text
e VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23261 August 8, 1996 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.96-357 Attention: Document Control Desk NL&OS/JBL R1 Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket No. 50-280 50-281 50-338 50-339 License No. DPR-32 DPR-37 NPF-4 NPF-7 Gentlemen:
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNITS 1 AND 2 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08, "THERMO-LAG 330-1 FIRE BARRIERS" By letter dated July 2, 1996, the NRC requested that Virginia Electric and Power Company provide plant-specific responses to Question 1.d of the NRC's request for additional information letter dated December 28, 1994. Specifically, the NRC requested Virginia Electric and Power Company to confirm that the Thermo-Lag material used at Surry and North Anna Power Stations to meet NRC requirements or licensing commitments are representative of the population of Thermo-Lag samples that were tested by the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI).
- Virginia Electric and Power Company responded to the NRC's December 28, 1994 request for additional information by letters dated March 28, 1995, July 26, 1995, and December 15, 1995. The December 15, 1995 letter provided technically justified exemption requests for use of Thermo-Lag as radiant energy shields inside the containments at North Anna and Surry. These exemption requests are still pending review and approval by the NRC.
Upon receipt of the NRC's July 2, 1996 request for additional information, Virginia Electric and Power Company reviewed the results of the NEI Generic Chemical Testing Program for Thermo-Lag material and the Company's records of purchased Thermo-Lag material for use at Surry and North Anna. Based on our review, we have determined that the results of the industry test program provides a firm basis to conclude that the chemical composition of the Thermo-Lag used at North Anna and Surry Power Stations is consistent with that tested by NUCON International, Inc. for the NEI effort. Virginia Electric and Power Company finds that the high degree of chemical r-~~9~6~0"\(a:,:1.,4.--,.0"0~3~4~9~6:;;;o--;;;;;ao=-a=------
PDR ADOCK 05000280 /
p PDR I
consistency exhibited adequately demonstrates that our materials are equivalent to the materials tested. The results of the material tests were provided to the NRC by letter from NEI dated October 3, 1995. This should close any questions regarding the material composition and consistency of Thermo-Lag materials used at Surry and North Anna as communicated in the 1O CFR 50.54(f) letters.
Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact us.
Very tJuly yours,
~?.~"'-'
James P. O'Hanlon Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. W. Branch NRC Senior Resident Inspector Surry Power Station Mr. R. D. McWhorter NRC Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )
)
COUNTY OF HENRICO )
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the County and Commonwealth aforesaid, today by J. P. O'Hanlon, who is Senior Vice President -
Nuclear, of Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is duly authorized to execute
- !t and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of-his knowledge and Acknowledged before me this £~day of .!/JLA!uJI.: , 199..k..
My Commission Expires: ./J?41 3 ( ,c-:{9']]{.
(SEAL)