ML19246A142: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Path Forward in Response to Comments on the | {{#Wiki_filter:Path Forward in Response to | ||
-11 Presentation by NRC | Comments on the NRCs Regulatory | ||
Issue Summary (RIS) 2016-11 | |||
-11 and to receive feedback from stakeholders. | Presentation by NRC Staff | ||
2 | September 6, 2019 | ||
Recent History of | |||
-12-025 (ML12065A038) | Purpose | ||
*Regulatory Issue Summary 2016 | To discuss the NRCs proposed path forward to | ||
-11, | address concerns regarding RIS 2016-11 and to | ||
-level Radioactive Waste Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002 (ML16007A488) | receive feedback from stakeholders. | ||
*South Texas Project (STP) Enforcement Issue EA | 2 | ||
3 | |||
Stakeholders | Recent History of Relevant | ||
*Nuclear Energy Institute (ML19086A320) | 10 CFR 20.2002 Guidance | ||
*EnergySolutions (ML19121A550) | * Agreement State (AS) Letter FSME-12-025 | ||
*Waste Control Specialists (ML19206A452) | (ML12065A038) | ||
4 | * Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-11, Requests | ||
to Dispose of Very Low-level Radioactive | |||
Waste Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002 | |||
(ML16007A488) | |||
* South Texas Project (STP) Enforcement Issue | |||
EA 18137 (ML18260A250) | |||
3 | |||
Stakeholders Letters | |||
* Nuclear Energy Institute (ML19086A320) | |||
* EnergySolutions (ML19121A550) | |||
* Waste Control Specialists (ML19206A452) | |||
4 | |||
Two-Step Process for Offsite Disposals | Two-Step Process for Offsite Disposals | ||
-Generator of waste requests approval of | - Generator of waste requests approval of | ||
*NRC receives 10 CFR 20.2002 request from its licensees | proposed disposal procedures | ||
-Recipient of Waste receives approval to receive and dispose of VLLW | * NRC receives 10 CFR 20.2002 request from its licensees | ||
*Agreement State, if applicable, approves disposal in non-licensed facility and grants exemption to non | - Recipient of Waste receives approval to receive | ||
and dispose of VLLW | |||
5 | * Agreement State, if applicable, approves disposal in | ||
non-licensed facility and grants exemption to non- | |||
-case-by-case Enforcement Discretion, as appropriate | licensed facility | ||
*Review of 20.2002 Requests | 5 | ||
-NRC, if applicable, will consider any Agreement State review and decision *Update RIS 2016 | |||
-11 (issue draft for comment) to describe how NRC will consider Agreement State review, if applicable, to facilitate NRC review of 20.2002 requests | NRCs Path Forward | ||
*10 CFR 20.2001 Approval | * For any 10 CFR Part 50 or 52 licensees that have used | ||
-Potential change in scope of acceptable disposal of VLLW | Agreement State approvals | ||
-Very Low-Level Waste Scoping Study | - case-by-case Enforcement Discretion, as appropriate | ||
6 | * Review of 20.2002 Requests | ||
Open Discussion | - NRC, if applicable, will consider any Agreement State review and | ||
*Comments from NEI, EnergySolutions, Waste Control Specialists, STP, and Agreement States on | decision | ||
7 | * Update RIS 2016-11 (issue draft for comment) to describe | ||
Public Comments | how NRC will consider Agreement State review, if | ||
*Comments from the public should be addressed to the NRC staff. | applicable, to facilitate NRC review of 20.2002 requests | ||
8 | * 10 CFR 20.2001 Approval | ||
Conclusion | - Potential change in scope of acceptable disposal of VLLW | ||
* | - Very Low-Level Waste Scoping Study | ||
* | 6 | ||
Open Discussion | |||
* Comments from NEI, EnergySolutions, Waste | |||
Control Specialists, STP, and Agreement States | |||
on NRCs Presentation | |||
7 | |||
Public Comments | |||
* Comments from the public should be | |||
addressed to the NRC staff. | |||
8 | |||
Conclusion | |||
* NRCs discussion of results of today's meeting | |||
* NRCs plan for formal responses to incoming | |||
letters | |||
* Please contact Stephen Dembek if you have | |||
additional comments at: | |||
Stephen.Dembek@nrc.gov or 301-415-2342 | |||
9 | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 22:51, 7 October 2019
| ML19246A142 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/06/2019 |
| From: | Stephen Dembek Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs |
| To: | |
| Dembek, Steve | |
| References | |
| RIS 2016-11 | |
| Download: ML19246A142 (9) | |
See also: RIS 2016-11
Text
Path Forward in Response to
Comments on the NRCs Regulatory
Issue Summary (RIS) 2016-11
Presentation by NRC Staff
September 6, 2019
Purpose
To discuss the NRCs proposed path forward to
address concerns regarding RIS 2016-11 and to
receive feedback from stakeholders.
2
Recent History of Relevant
10 CFR 20.2002 Guidance
- Agreement State (AS) Letter FSME-12-025
- Regulatory Issue Summary 2016-11, Requests
to Dispose of Very Low-level Radioactive
Waste Pursuant to 10 CFR 20.2002
EA 18137 (ML18260A250)
3
Stakeholders Letters
- Nuclear Energy Institute (ML19086A320)
- EnergySolutions (ML19121A550)
- Waste Control Specialists (ML19206A452)
4
Two-Step Process for Offsite Disposals
- Generator of waste requests approval of
proposed disposal procedures
- NRC receives 10 CFR 20.2002 request from its licensees
- Recipient of Waste receives approval to receive
and dispose of VLLW
- Agreement State, if applicable, approves disposal in
non-licensed facility and grants exemption to non-
licensed facility
5
NRCs Path Forward
- For any 10 CFR Part 50 or 52 licensees that have used
Agreement State approvals
- case-by-case Enforcement Discretion, as appropriate
- Review of 20.2002 Requests
- NRC, if applicable, will consider any Agreement State review and
decision
- Update RIS 2016-11 (issue draft for comment) to describe
how NRC will consider Agreement State review, if
applicable, to facilitate NRC review of 20.2002 requests
- 10 CFR 20.2001 Approval
- Potential change in scope of acceptable disposal of VLLW
- Very Low-Level Waste Scoping Study
6
Open Discussion
- Comments from NEI, EnergySolutions, Waste
Control Specialists, STP, and Agreement States
on NRCs Presentation
7
Public Comments
- Comments from the public should be
addressed to the NRC staff.
8
Conclusion
- NRCs discussion of results of today's meeting
- NRCs plan for formal responses to incoming
letters
- Please contact Stephen Dembek if you have
additional comments at:
Stephen.Dembek@nrc.gov or 301-415-2342
9