ML13066A791: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/07/2013 | | issue date = 03/07/2013 | ||
| title = Email Miller to Cook Et Al Re Vogtle Hazard Report Cover Letter | | title = Email Miller to Cook Et Al Re Vogtle Hazard Report Cover Letter | ||
| author name = Miller G | | author name = Miller G | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD/PMB | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/JLD/PMB | ||
| addressee name = Bensi M | | addressee name = Bensi M, Cook C, Wilson G | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRO, NRC/NRR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRO, NRC/NRR | ||
| docket = 05000424, 05000425 | | docket = 05000424, 05000425 | ||
Revision as of 06:37, 22 June 2019
| ML13066A791 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 03/07/2013 |
| From: | Geoffrey Miller Containment and Balance of Plant Branch |
| To: | Bensi M, Christopher Cook, George Wilson Office of New Reactors, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML13066A791 (1) | |
Text
From:Miller, Ed To:Cook, Christopher; Bensi, Michelle; Wilson, George Cc:Martin, Robert
Subject:
Vogtle Hazard Report Cover Letter Date:Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:20:00 PM All,I just had a call with Ken McElroy about the March 5, 2013, letter submitted by Southern that contained Vogtle's flooding hazard reanalysis.
The subject language was on thesecond page of the cover letter that stated:
If an integrated assessment is requested by the NRC as specified in Reference 1, it will be complete in 2015 or per the priority determined by the NRC after all reevaluations requested by Reference 1 are complete and submitted by Reference 1 recipients.
I clarified that the NRC wasn't intending to identify those licensees that needed to do an integrated assessment.
Instead, the licensee would need to compare the reevaluatedhazard to the current design basis and determine the need for one.
Additionally, I clarifiedthat the subsequent prioritization was only for seismic and all integrated assessments would be due 2 years from submission of the hazard report.
They indicated that they agreed that Vogtle would need to do an integrated assessment and would send in a supplemental letter to clarify the original statement.
I'll put this e-mail in ADAMS to document the interaction.
Please let me know if you haveany questions.
Ed Miller 301-415-2481