IR 05000315/2014001: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 03/04/2015 | | issue date = 03/04/2015 | ||
| title = Annual Assessment Letter for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, (Report 05000315/2014001 and 05000316/2014001) | | title = Annual Assessment Letter for Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, (Report 05000315/2014001 and 05000316/2014001) | ||
| author name = Riemer K | | author name = Riemer K | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B2 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B2 | ||
| addressee name = Weber L | | addressee name = Weber L | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:March 4, 2015 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 (REPORT 05000 315/20 14001 AND 05000 316/20 14 001) | |||
==Dear Mr. Weber:== | ==Dear Mr. Weber:== | ||
On February 11, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | On February 11, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
completed its end | completed its end-of-cycle performance review of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from January 1, 20 14 through December 31, 20 14. This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility. | ||
-of-cycle performance review of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from January 1, 20 14 through December 31, 20 14. This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility. | |||
The NRC determined that overall, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objectives. The NRC determined the performance at both Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Units during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC | The NRC determined that overall, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objectives. The NRC determined the performance at both Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Units during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC | ||
's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility. | 's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility. | ||
The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through June 30, 20 1 6. Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan. The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the mid | The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through June 30, 20 1 6. Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan. The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the mid-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes. | ||
-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes. | |||
This inspection plan does not include security related inspections, which will be sent via separate, non | This inspection plan does not include security related inspections, which will be sent via separate, non-publicly available correspondence. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywi de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
-publicly available correspondence. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywi de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading | |||
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Please contact me at 6 30-829-9628 with any questions you have regarding this letter. | Please contact me at 6 30-829-9628 with any questions you have regarding this letter. | ||
Revision as of 02:11, 21 June 2019
| ML15062A590 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 03/04/2015 |
| From: | Kenneth Riemer NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B2 |
| To: | Weber L Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| References | |
| IR 2014001 | |
| Download: ML15062A590 (4) | |
Text
March 4, 2015
SUBJECT:
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 (REPORT 05000 315/20 14001 AND 05000 316/20 14 001)
Dear Mr. Weber:
On February 11, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
completed its end-of-cycle performance review of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The NRC reviewed the most recent quarterly performance indicators (PIs) in addition to inspection results and enforcement actions from January 1, 20 14 through December 31, 20 14. This letter informs you of the NRC's assessment of your facility during this period and its plans for future inspections at your facility.
The NRC determined that overall, Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and met all cornerstone objectives. The NRC determined the performance at both Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Units during the most recent quarter was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC
's Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Action Matrix because all inspection findings had very low (i.e., green) safety significance, and all PIs indicated that your performance was within the nominal, expected range (i.e., green). Therefore, the NRC plans to conduct ROP baseline inspections at your facility.
The enclosed inspection plan lists the inspections scheduled through June 30, 20 1 6. Routine inspections performed by resident inspectors are not included in the inspection plan. The inspections listed during the last nine months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the mid-cycle performance review. The NRC provides the inspection plan to allow for the resolution of any scheduling conflicts and personnel availability issues. The NRC will contact you as soon as possible to discuss changes to the inspection plan should circumstances warrant any changes.
This inspection plan does not include security related inspections, which will be sent via separate, non-publicly available correspondence. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC's Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywi de Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Please contact me at 6 30-829-9628 with any questions you have regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
/RA/ Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.
50-315; 50-316 License Nos.
D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Station Inspection/Activity Plan cc w/encl: Distribution via LISTSERV