ML101241032: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML101241032 | | number = ML101241032 | ||
| issue date = 03/29/2010 | | issue date = 03/29/2010 | ||
| title = | | title = 2010-04-Written Exam Analysis | ||
| author name = | | author name = | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 13 April 2019
| ML101241032 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/2010 |
| From: | NRC Region 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-445-10-04, 50-446-10-04 | |
| Download: ML101241032 (1) | |
Text
CPNPP NRC 2010 Written Exam Analysis 4_5_10.xls1-75 RO / 76-100 SRO OnlyVALUE:11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111Date: 04/05/2010KEY ANSWERS:BAACADDCACDBAADBBACBBCBDBCCBDACADCAADCDBDBDBACDBBD NameTOTAL% PTS123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495092.092.0CBD89.089.0CDCBD92.092.0CAA90.768.0BCDD 92.069.0BAAA88.066.0ABAABACCPNPP NRC 2010 Written Exam Analysis86.765.0BCCD A BD92.069.0BDBA 89.367.0DCDC1111411333 62111121232VALUE:11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111CCDDBCBDACBDCDCBDBCBADCACAACDBBDACCDBAACCBAABCBABA NameSRO %RO %5152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788899091929394959697989910084.094.7CAABA88.089.3CABBBA 88.093.3DBCAB90.7CAA 92.0AA 88.0BD 86.7DCD 92.0DD89.3 C D D CTotal MissedKEY ANSWERS:89.3 C D D C111121231221111111 2111 2 1Average86.790.7SRO Total Points =
100RO Only Points =
75 25Comments: Question 27 was discussed with candidates. The question is based around MODE 6 operations that are primarily covered in the classroom. They understand after review that the purpose of the question was to assess their knowledge of requirements for containment integrity while moving fuel. We consider discussion of this topic as adequate assessment and closure for this high miss question. Question 80 was discussed with the SRO candidates and those that missed the question stated they just did not recall the CET temperature entry into SACRG-1. We consider discussion of this topic as adequate assessment and closure for this high miss question. Question 97 was discussed with the SRO candidates and those that missed the question said they were going to pick either A or B and understand why A is not correct. We consider discussion of this topic as adequate assessment and closure for this high miss question.SRO Only Points =Total Missed1 of 1