ML11221A365: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11221A365
| number = ML11221A365
| issue date = 12/17/2010
| issue date = 12/17/2010
| title = Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-573, ERCW Pipeline Section C-C
| title = Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-573, ERCW Pipeline Section C-C
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority

Revision as of 05:37, 30 January 2019

Amendment 102 to Final Safety Analysis Report (Fsar), Figure 2.5-573, ERCW Pipeline Section C-C
ML11221A365
Person / Time
Site: Watts Bar Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2010
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML11221A365 (1)


Text

750 -k./ 730 I 720 7 IO 700 690 680 670 6 60 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 ERCW -DISCHA%* .-- I i: ' e- c iG;~ G- SP- SM 750 740 730 720 710 700 690 680 670 660 POTENTtAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 1.5% E CRITERIA { INCHES) (E) POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT BASED ON 6% E: CRITERIA (INCHES) DESIGN WATER TABLE X WATER TABLE (24HR) MH SOIL CLASSIFICATION I3 8UW COUNT ~ POTENTIALLY LIQUEFIABLE SOIL (SEE NOTE) -WS WEATHERED SHALE NOTE: I, LIQUEFACTION BASED ON TOP OF GROUND ACCELERATION OF 0.4-g CORRELATION FOR SANDS. AND SEED-IRRISS (1971) Added by Amendment 50 __ -- WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT FINAL SAFETY ANALYSlS REPORT ERGW PIPELINE SECTION G-G FIGURE 2.5-573