IR 05000341/2007002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams|number = ML071270132}}
{{Adams
| number = ML071270132
| issue date = 05/04/2007
| title = IR 05000341-07-002, on 01/01/2007-03/31/2007, Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2, Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness
| author name = Lipa C A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB4
| addressee name = Davis J
| addressee affiliation = Detroit Edison
| docket = 05000341
| license number = NPF-043
| contact person =
| document report number = IR-07-002
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
| page count = 40
}}


{{IR-Nav| site = 05000341 | year = 2007 | report number = 002 }}
{{IR-Nav| site = 05000341 | year = 2007 | report number = 002 }}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:M ay 4, 200 7 M r. Ja ck Da v is , S eni or V ic e P resi den t and C hi ef Nuc le ar Off ic er De troi t E di son C ompa ny F e rmi 2 - 2 1 0 N OC 640 0 N orth Di x ie H ighw ay Ne w port, M I 4 816 6
[[Issue date::May 4, 2007]]
 
Mr. Jack Davis, Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear OfficerDetroit Edison CompanyFermi 2 - 210 NOC6400 North Dixie HighwayNewport, MI 48166


SUBJECT:
SUBJECT:
FERMI POWER PLANT, UNIT 2, NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000341/2007002
FERM I PO W ER PLANT, UNIT 2, NRC INTEG RAT ED INS PE CTION R EP ORT 05 000 341/200 700 2 De ar M r. D av is: On M arch 31 , 20 07, the U.S. N ucl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on (NR C) compl eted an i ntegrated in spe cti on at y our Fermi P ow er P la nt, U ni t The enc lo sed rep ort d ocu ments the in spe cti on fi n d i n g s w h i c h w e r e d i s c u s s e d o n A p r i l 5 , 2 0 0 7 , w i t h y o u a n d o t h e r m e m b e r s o f y o u r s t a ff.The i n sp e ct i o n e x a mi n e d a ct i v i ti e s co n d u ct e d u n d e r y o u r l i ce n se a s th e y r e l a te t o s a fety a n d t o co mp l i a n ce w i th t h e C o mmi ss i o n's ru l e s a n d r e gul a ti o n s a n d w i th t h e c o n d i ti o n s o f y o u r l i ce n se. The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sel ecte d p roce dure s a nd reco rds, obs erv ed acti v iti es, and i nterv ie w ed pers onnel.B a se d o n t h e r e su l ts o f th i s i n sp e ct i o n , tw o fi n d i n gs o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce w e re identif ied one of w hich inv olv ed a v iolation of NRC req uirem ent How ever, becau se this f in di ng w as of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d b eca use the i ssu e w as ente red in to y our corre cti v e p rogram, the N RC i s tre ati ng the find in g as a N on-C ite d V io la tio n i n a cco rdan ce w i th S e ct i o n V I.A.1 o f th e N R C's E n forc e me n t P o l i c I f y o u c o n te st t h e s u b je ct o r se v e ri ty of a Non-Cited Violation, you should provi de a respons e w ithin 30 day s of the date of this in spe cti on repo rt, w ith the ba si s for y our den ia l, to th e U.S. Nu cl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on, ATTN: D ocu ment Co ntrol D esk, W ash in gton, D C 205 55-0 001 , w ith a cop y to the Re gion al Ad min is trator, U.S. N ucl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on - R egio n III, 244 3 W arren v il le R oad , S u i te 2 1 0 , L i sl e , IL 6 0 5 3 2-4 3 5 2; th e D i re ct o r, Offic e o f E n forc e me n t, U.S. N u cl e a r R e gul a to ry Co mmissi on, W ash in gton, D C 205 55-0 001; an d th e R esi den t Ins pec tor Off ic e a t the Ferm i 2 f ac ilit J. D av is
-2-In a cco rdan ce w ith 10 C FR 2.3 90 of the NR C's "R ul es of Prac tic e," a co py of thi s l etter and its enclosur e w ill be made avail able electr onically f or public inspect ion in the NRC Pu bl ic D ocu ment Ro om o r from the Pu bl ic ly A v ai la bl e R eco rds (PA RS) co mpon ent of NR C's d ocu ment sy stem (A DA M S). A DA M S is ac ces si bl e from the N RC W eb si te a th tt p://w w w.n rc.go v/r e a d i n g-rm/a d a ms.h tml (th e P u b l i c E l e ct ro n i c R e a d i n g R o o m).


==Dear Mr. Davis:==
Sin ce r ely,/R A/
On March 31, 2007, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an integratedinspection at your Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2. The enclosed report documents the inspectionfindings which were discussed on April 5, 2007, with you and other members of your staff.The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and tocompliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewedpersonnel.Based on the results of this inspection, two findings of very low safety significance wereidentified one of which involved a violation of NRC requirements. However, because thisfinding was of very low safety significance and because the issue was entered into yourcorrective program, the NRC is treating the finding as a Non-Cited Violation in accordancewith Section VI.A.1 of the NRC's Enforcement Policy. If you contest the subject or severityof a Non-Cited Violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of thisinspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001, with a copy to the RegionalAdministrator, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III, 2443 Warrenville Road,Suite 210, Lisle, IL 60532-4352; the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the Resident Inspector Office at the Fermi 2facility. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letterand its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRCPublic Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component ofNRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site athttp://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Ch ris tin e A. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s Do cket No. 50-341 Li cen se No. N PF-43 En cl osu re:
Insp ecti on Re port 050 003 41/2 007 002 w/Attac hmen t: S upp le mental Informati on cc w/enc l:
K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Pe ttin ari , Le gal De partmen t M i ch i gan D e p a rt me n t o f E n v i ro n me n ta l Qu a l i ty W aste an d H az ardo us M ateri al s D iv is io n M. Y u d a sz , Jr., D i re ct o r, M o n ro e C o u n ty Emergenc y M ana gement D iv is io n S u p e rv i so r - E l e ct ri c Op e ra to rs Sta te L ia is on Of f ic er, S tate of M ic hi gan W ay ne Co unty E mergency M ana gement D iv is io n J. D av is
-2-In a cco rdan ce w ith 10 C FR 2.3 90 of the NR C's "R ul es of Prac tic e," a co py of thi s l etter and its enclosur e w ill be made avail able electr onically f or public inspect ion in the NRC Pu bl ic D ocu ment Ro om o r from the Pu bl ic ly A v ai la bl e R eco rds (PA RS) co mpon ent of NR C's d ocu ment sy stem (A DA M S). A DA M S is ac ces si bl e from the N RC W eb si te a th tt p://w w w.n rc.go v/r e a d i n g-rm/a d a ms.h tml (th e P u b l i c E l e ct ro n i c R e a d i n g R o o m).


Sincerely,/RA/
Sin ce r ely, Ch ris tin e A. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s Do cket No. 50-341 Li cen se No. N PF-43 En cl osu re:
Christine A. Lipa, Chief Branch 4 Division of Reactor ProjectsDocket No. 50-341License No. NPF-43
Insp ecti on Re port 050 003 41/2 007 002 w/Attac hmen t: S upp le mental Informati on cc w/enc l:
K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Pe ttin ari , Le gal De partmen t M i ch i gan D e p a rt me n t o f E n v i ro n me n ta l Qu a l i ty W aste an d H az ardo us M ateri al s D iv is io n M. Y u d a sz , Jr., D i re ct o r, M o n ro e C o u n ty Emergenc y M ana gement D iv is io n S u p e rv i so r - E l e ct ri c Op e ra to rs Sta te L ia is on Of f ic er, S tate of M ic hi gan W ay ne Co unty E mergency M ana gement D iv is io n DOCU M EN T NA M E: C:\M y Fi le s\Co pi es\F ER 20 07 002.w pdG P ublicl y A v ailab le G N on-Pub licly A v ailab le G Se ns i ti ve G Non-S en s i ti ve T o r ece iv e a copy of th is docu m en t, in dica te in th e c on cu r r en ce box "C" = C opy wi th ou t a ttac h/en cl "E" = C opy wi th at tach/en cl "N" = N o cop y OF F IC E R II I R II I NA M E RL erch:dtp CL ip a DA TE 05/0 4/07 05/0 4/07OF FICI AL RECORD COPY Lette r to Jac k Dav is from Chri sti ne A. Li pa date d


===Enclosure:===
SUBJECT:
Inspection Report 05000341/2007002
FERM I PO W ER PLANT, UNIT 2, NRC INTEG RAT ED INS PE CTION R EP ORT 05 000 341/200 700 2 DIST RIBUT IO N: T EB LX R1 A X M8 RidsNrr DirsI rib GEG K GO GLS R MM3 CAA1 LS L (ele ct r on ic IR's onl y)C. Ped er so n, DRS (h ar d c op y - I R's onl y)D R P II I D R S II I PLB1 TXN RO Pr ep or t s@nr c.g ov (i n sp e ct i o n r e p o rt s, fi n a l S D P l e tt e rs , a n y l e tt e r w i th a n I R n u mb e r)
E n cl o su reU. S. N U C L E A R R E GU L A TOR Y C OM M IS S IONR E GION I II Do cket No:
50-3 41 Li cen se No:
NP F-43 Re port No:
050 003 41/2 007 002 Li cen see:
De troi t E di son C ompa ny F a ci l i ty:
F e rmi P o w e r P l a n t, U n i t 2 Loc ati on:
Ne w port, M ic hi gan Da tes:
Jan uary 1 throu gh M arch 31 , 20 07 Insp ecto rs:
R. M ic hae l M orri s, S eni or R esi den t Ins pec tor T. Stea dha m, Re si den t Ins pec tor R. Ji ckli ng, Se ni or E mergency P repa redn ess A nal y st D. Jon es, Re acto r Ins pec tor B. Jos e, R eac tor E ngin eer M. P hal en, He al th P hy si ci st A. W il son , R eac tor In spe ctor Ap prov ed by:
C. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s 2
En cl osu reS U MMA R Y OF F IN D IN GS IR 050 003 41/2 007 002; 01/01/2 007-03/3 1/20 07; Fermi P ow er P la nt, U ni t 2; Ra di ati on Pro tecti on and E mergency P repa redn ess.This rep ort c ov ers a th ree-mon th p eri od of in spe cti on by res id ent in spe ctors and an nou nce d bas el in e i nsp ecti ons by regi ona l-b ase d e mergency pre pare dne ss and rad ia tio n p rotec tio n in spe ctor Tw o Gre en f in di ngs, on e o f w hi ch w as ass oci ated w ith a No n-C ite d V io la tio n, w ere id enti f ie The s igni f ic anc e o f most f in di ngs i s i ndi cate d b y the ir col or (Gree n, W hi te, Ye ll ow , R ed) usi ng Insp ecti on M anu al C hap ter (IM C) 060 9, "S igni f ic anc e D etermi nati on Pro ces s (S DP)." F in di ngs for w hi ch the SD P doe s n ot a ppl y may be "Green" or be ass igne d a s e v e r i t y l e v e l a ft e r N R C m a n a g e m e n t r e v i e T h e N R C's p r o g r a m f o r o v e r s e e i n g t h e s a fe ope rati on of commerci al nu cl ear pow er re acto rs i s d esc rib ed in N UR EG-16 49, "Re acto r Ov ersi ght Pro ces s," R ev is io n 4 , da ted De cembe r 20 06.A.


===w/Attachment:===
NR C-Id entifie d and S elf-Re v eale d Find ings Co rne rsto ne: E merge ncy P rep are dne ss*
Supplemental Informationcc w/encl:
Gre e Th e i n sp e ct o rs i d e n ti fie d a fi n d i n g a ss o ci a te d w i th t h e fai l u re t o v e ri fy a d e qua te compe nsa tory mea sure s w ere in pl ace w hi le the E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty (E OF)w as una v ai la bl The l ic ens ee remov ed the EOF f rom se rv ic e for re mode li ng an d pl ann ed to u se thei r A lte rnate E OF (A EOF) f or e mergency res pon se if requi red as a compe nsa tory ac tio Ho w ev er, l ocks p la ced on the do ors to th e A EOF and the l ack of con tin uou s s taff in g of the facil ity co ul d h av e d el ay ed acti v ati on of the f aci li t A f ter th e is sue w as id enti f ie d b y the i nsp ecto r, the l ic ens ee took pro mpt i nteri m corre cti v e a cti ons a n d e n te re d t h e i ss u e i n to t h e i r co rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m.This find in g w as dete rmin ed to b e mo re th an min or b eca use i t w as si mil ar to an ex ampl e i n IM C 061 2, A ppe ndi x E , i n th at th e A EOF and the pro ced ures for acti v ati ng the AE OF w ere in a con di tio n th at c oul d h av e d el ay ed the li cen see's re spo nse to an e me rge n c Th e fi n d i n g w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce b e ca u se a d e qua te compe nsa tory mea sure s w ere put in pl ace w ith in se v en day (Se cti on 4OA3)C o r n e r s t o n e: O c c u p a t i o n a l R a d i a t i o n S a f e t y *
K. Hlavaty, Plant Manager R. Gaston, Manager, Nuclear Licensing D. Pettinari, Legal Department Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Waste and Hazardous Materials Division M. Yudasz, Jr., Director, Monroe County Emergency Management Division Supervisor - Electric Operators State Liaison Officer, State of Michigan Wayne County Emergency Management Division
Gree The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d a n assoc iated Non-
Cited Violation (NCV) of NRC req uirem ents f or th e f ailure to m aintain ade quate proc edu res f or th e c al ib rati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge are a ra di ati on mo nitor s (D11-K816 A and B). Specif ically , the li cense e had revised i ts pr ocedur es in 200 1 to remo v e th e re quire ment to c al ib rate the dete ctors w ith a radi oac tiv e s ourc e o f know n a cti v it C ons equen tly , the mon ito r ha d n ot b een ad equatel y ca li brate d s in ce Ap ril 20 0 F ol lo w in g that id enti f ic ati on, the li cen see pe rf ormed an ev al uati on and dete rmin ed that the moni tor w as f unc tio nal ba sed on i ts a dequa te re spo nse to ambi ent ra d i a ti o n l e v e l En cl osu reThe find in g w as more than mi nor bec aus e i t w as ass oci ated w ith the Occu pati ona l Ra di ati on Sa f ety co rners tone attri bute of Pl ant Fac il iti es/E quip ment and Ins trumenta tio n a n d a ff e ct e d t h e c o rn e rs to n e o b je ct i v e o f en su ri n g a d e qua te p ro te ct i o n o f w o rke r h e a l th and sa f ety from ex pos ure to ra di ati on f rom ra di oac tiv e ma teri al s d uri ng ci v il ia n n ucl ear re a ct o r o p e ra ti o S i n ce t h e fi n d i n g i n v o l v e d a re a r a d i a ti o n mo n i to rs , th e i n sp e ct o rs u ti l i z e d I n sp e ct i o n M a n u a l C h a p te r 0 6 0 9 , A p p e n d i x C , "Oc cu p a ti o n a l R a d i a ti o n S a fety SD P," to a sse ss its si gnifica nc Gi v en that in strumen t functi ona l resp ons e w as dete rmin ed throu gh el ectro ni c c al ib rati on and a qual ita tiv e re spo nse to radi ati on, and si n ce t h e i ss u e d i d n o t i n v o l v e a s-l o w-a s-i s-re a so n a b l y-a ch i e v a b l e p l a n n i n g o r w o rk con trol s, th ere w as no ov erex pos ure or s ubs tanti al po tenti al for an ov erex pos ure to th e w o rke r, n o r w a s th e l i ce n se e's a b i l i ty t o a ss e ss d o se c o mp ro mi se d; th e i n sp e ct o rs con cl ude d th at th e S DP as ses sment f or th e fin di ng w as of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce (Gr e e n). T he licensee's planned corr ect iv e actions included re vi sing the applicable proc edu res to p erform a full de tecto r ca li brati on uti li z in g a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n a nd in cl udi ng spe ci f ic ac cep tanc e c rite ria , an d c la rify in g Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns and the bas es. (Se cti on 2OS3.3)B.


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Lice nse e-Ide ntified V iolatio nsNo ne 4
IR 05000341/2007002; 01/01/2007-03/31/2007; Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2; Radiation Protectionand Emergency Preparedness.This report covers a three-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and announcedbaseline inspections by regional-based emergency preparedness and radiation protectioninspectors. Two Green findings, one of which was associated with a Non-Cited Violation,were identified. The significance of most findings is indicated by their color (Green, White,Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance DeterminationProcess (SDP)."  Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be "Green" or be assigneda severity level after NRC management review. The NRC's program for overseeing the safeoperation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "ReactorOversight Process," Revision 4, dated December 2006.A.
En cl osu reRE PORT D ET A ILSSu mmary o f P lant Sta tusOn J a n u a ry 6 , 2 0 0 7 , U n i t 2 r e d u ce d p o w e r to 6 8 p e rc e n t to p e rfor m a r o d p a tt e rn adju stment and retu rned to f ul l pow er o n J anu ary 7, 200 Un it 2 o pera ted at o r nea r full po w er th rougho ut th e re mai nde r of the i nsp ecti on peri od.1.


NRC-Identified and Self-Revealed Findings 
RE A CTO R SA FE TYC o rn e rs to n e: I n it ia ti n g E v e n ts , B a rr ie r In te g ri ty , Mit ig a ti n g S y s te ms , and Emer gen cy P rep are dne ss 1R 01 Ad v erse W eath er (7 111 1.01) Insp ecti on Sco pe The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see pro ced ures for miti gatin g the eff ects of col d w eath er and hi gh w in ds in the res id ual he at re mov al (R HR) co mpl ex an d o utsi de doo r The in spe ctors performed w al kdow ns and rev ie w ed sev ere w eath er p roce dure s, e mergency pl an imp le menti ng pro ced ures rel ated to sev ere w eath er, a nd ann unc ia tor re spo nse proc edu re A ddi tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed con di tio n a sse ssmen t res ol uti on d o cu me n ts (C A R D s) a n d v e ri fie d p ro b l e ms a ss o ci a te d w i th a d v e rs e w e a th e r w e re ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e ch a ra ct e ri z a ti o These acti v iti es compl eted on e c ol d w eath er s y stems in spe cti on sampl F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 04 Equi pmen t A li gnments (711 11.0 4).1 P a rt i a l S y st e m W a l kdo w n (7 1 1 1 1.0 4 Q) a.


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs p erformed p arti al sy stem w al kdow ns of the f ol lo w in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy stems:*
*
Torus H arde ned V ent performed the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*
: '''Green.'''
Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g (RC IC) Sy stem p erformed th e w eek of M arch 18 , 20 07; and *
The inspectors identified a finding associated with the failure to verify adequatecompensatory measures were in place while the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)was unavailable. The licensee removed the EOF from service for remodeling andplanned to use their Alternate EOF (AEOF) for emergency response if required as acompensatory action. However, locks placed on the doors to the AEOF and the lack ofcontinuous staffing of the facility could have delayed activation of the facility. After theissue was identified by the inspector, the licensee took prompt interim corrective actionsand entered the issue into their corrective action program.This finding was determined to be more than minor because it was similar to anexample in IMC 0612, Appendix E, in that the AEOF and the procedures for activatingthe AEOF were in a condition that could have delayed the licensee's response to anemergency. The finding was of very low safety significance because adequatecompensatory measures were put in place within seven days. (Section 4OA3)
D i v i s i o n I I R H R/R e s i d u a l H e a t R e mo v a l S e r v i c e W a t e r p e r fo r me d t h e w e e ks of M arch 11 an d M arch 18 , 20 0 En cl osu reThe i nsp ecto rs s el ecte d th ese sy stems bas ed on thei r ri sk si gnifica nce rel ati v e to the reac tor s afety co rners tone The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed ope rati ng pro ced ures , sy stem di agrams, Tech ni cal S pec ifica tio n (TS) requi rements , A dmi ni strati v e TS, and the i mpact o f o n g o i n g w o r k a c t i v i t i e s o n r e d u n d a n t t r a i n s o f e q u i p m e n t i n o r d e r t o i d e n t i fy con di tio ns that cou ld ha v e re nde red the sy stems in cap abl e o f pe rf ormi ng the ir in tend ed fu n c t i o n T h e i n s p e c t o r s a l s o w a l ke d d o w n a c c e s s i b l e p o r t i o n s o f t h e s y s t e m s t o v e r i fy sys t em co m po ne nt s wer e al ig ne d c or r ec t ly.In a ddi tio n, th e i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d e quip ment al ignmen t pro bl ems w ere ente red in to th e corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e qua rterl y pa rtia l sy stem w al kdow n i nsp ecti on sampl e b.


===Cornerstone: Occupational Radiation Safety ===
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Com plete System W alk down (711 11.0 4S) a.
*
: '''Green.'''
The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and anassociated Non-Cited Violation (NCV) of NRC requirements for the failure to maintainadequate procedures for the calibration of the containment high range area radiationmonitors (D11-K816 A and B). Specifically, the licensee had revised its procedures in2001 to remove the requirement to calibrate the detectors with a radioactive source ofknown activity. Consequently, the monitor had not been adequately calibrated sinceApril 2000. Following that identification, the licensee performed an evaluation anddetermined that the monitor was functional based on its adequate response to ambientradiation levels.


EnclosureThe finding was more than minor because it was associated with the OccupationalRadiation Safety cornerstone attribute of Plant Facilities/Equipment and Instrumentationand affected the cornerstone objective of ensuring adequate protection of worker healthand safety from exposure to radiation from radioactive materials during civilian nuclearreactor operation. Since the finding involved area radiation monitors, the inspectorsutilized Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix C, "Occupational Radiation SafetySDP," to assess its significance. Given that instrument functional response wasdetermined through electronic calibration and a qualitative response to radiation, andsince the issue did not involve as-low-as-is-reasonably-achievable planning or workcontrols, there was no overexposure or substantial potential for an overexposure to theworker, nor was the licensee's ability to assess dose compromised; the inspectorsconcluded that the SDP assessment for the finding was of very low safety significance(Green). The licensee's planned corrective actions included revising the applicableprocedures to perform a full detector calibration utilizing a known source of radiation andincluding specific acceptance criteria, and clarifying Technical Specifications and thebases. (Section 2OS3.3)
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs p erformed a co mpl ete sy stem w al kdow n o f the foll ow in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy st e m:*
Co re S pray S y stem p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 14 , 20 07.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed ope rati ng pro ced ures , sy stem d ia grams, TS requi rements , an d app li cab le se cti ons of the U pda ted Fi nal S afety A nal y si s R epo rt (U FS AR) to ens ure the corre ct s y stem l in eu The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d a cce ptab le mate ria l con di tio n o f sy stem co mp o n e n ts , a v a i l a b i l i ty o f el e ct ri ca l p o w e r to s y st e m c o mp o n e n ts , a n d t h a t a n ci l l a ry equi pmen t or deb ris di d n ot i nterfere w ith sy stem p erformanc The in spe ctors w al ked dow n a cce ssi bl e p orti ons of the sy stem to v eri f y sy stem c ompo nen ts w ere al igne d co r r ec t ly.These acti v iti es compl eted on e s emi-ann ual co mpl ete sy stem w al kdow n i nsp ecti on sampl b.


===B.
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 05 Fi re P rotec tio n (7 111 1.05).1 R o u ti n e R e si d e n t In sp e ct o r Tou rs (7 1 1 1 1.0 5 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d fire pro tecti on tours of the foll ow in g ris k-signi f ic ant pl ant area s:
6 En cl osu re*
Div ision II Cont rol Comp lex Heating , Vent ilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)Ro om p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 7, 200 7;*
Sta ndb y Li quid C ontro l Pu mp A rea performed the w eek of Jan uary 14 , 20 07;*
Torus R oom Ba semen t pe rf ormed the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*
Di v is io n I Sw itc hgear Ro om p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 28 , 20 07;*
Re acto r B ui ld in g Comp one nt C ool in g W ater He at E x cha nger R oom performed the w eek of M arch 25 , 20 07; and*
Co ntrol R oom performed the w eek of M arch 24 , 20 07.The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d fire z one co ndi tio ns w ere con si sten t w ith as sumpti ons i n th e li cen see's F ire H az ards A nal y si The i nsp ecto rs w al ked do w n fire de tecti on and su p p re ss i o n e qui p me n t, a ss e ss e d t h e ma te ri a l c o n d i ti o n o f fir e fi ght i n g e qui p me n t, a n d e v a l u a te d t h e c o n tr o l o f tra n si e n t co mb u st i b l e ma te ri a l In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v eri f ie d fire pro tecti on rel ated pro bl ems w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted si x quarte rly fire prote cti on - tou r i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d 1R 06 Fl ood P rotec tio n (7 111 1.06) a.


Licensee-Identified Violations===
Insp ecti on Sco pe The i n sp e ct o rs p e rfor me d a n i n sp e ct i o n r e l a te d t o t h e l i ce n se e's p re ca u ti o n s to mi ti gat e the ris k f rom i ntern al floo di ng ev ent The i nsp ecto rs p erformed a w al kdow n o f the f ol lo w in g pl ant area to ass ess the ad equacy of w aterti ght do ors and v eri f y dra in s a nd sumps w ere cl ear of deb ris an d w ere ope rabl e:*
None
F l o o d D o o r s a n d B a r r i e r s I n s i d e P o w e r B l o c k.The i n sp e ct o rs a l so r e v i e w e d t h e w o rk a ct i v i ti e s a ss o ci a te d w i th i n te rn a l fl o o d i n g to v e ri fy i d e n ti fie d p ro b l e ms w e re b e i n g e n te re d i n to t h e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m w i th the app ropri ate cha racte riz ati on and si gnifica nce.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i ntern al f lo od prote cti on in spe cti on sampl b.


Enclosure
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R07 Heat Sink Perf orm ance (7 1111.07A) a.


=REPORT DETAILS=
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d c o mp l e te d t e st r e p o rt s for e me rge n cy d i e se l ge n e ra to rs (ED Gs) 11 , 12 , 13 , an d 1 4 ja cket co ol ant sy stems, lu be oi l, and ai r co ol ant sy stem h eat 7
Summary of Plant StatusOn January 6, 2007, Unit 2 reduced power to 68 percent to perform a rod patternadjustment and returned to full power on January 7, 2007. Unit 2 operated at ornear full power throughout the remainder of the inspection period.1.
En cl osu re ex cha nger The i nsp ecto rs s el ecte d th ese he at e x cha ngers b eca use the ir ass oci ated sy st e ms w e re r i sk si gni fic a n t i n t h e l i ce n se e's ri sk a ss e ss me n t a n d w e re r e qui re d t o sup port the ope rabi li ty of oth er ri sk-signi f ic ant, safety-rel ated equi pmen D uri ng the se in spe cti ons , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed app li cab le do cumen ts a nd proc edu re In add iti on, the in spe ctors v eri f ie d h eat si nk prob le ms w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on pr og r am w it h t he app r op r iat e s ig nif ic an ce ch ar ac t er izat ion and co m ple t ed co r r ec t ive a ct i o n s w e re a d e qua te a n d a p p ro p ri a te l y i mp l e me n te These acti v iti es compl eted on e h eat si nk performance i nsp ecti on sampl b.


==REACTOR SAFETY==
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 1 L i ce n se d Op e ra to r R e qua l i fic a ti o n (7 1 1 1 1.1 1 Q) a.


===Cornerstone:===
Insp ecti on Sco peOn F ebru ary 8, 200 7, th e i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed an ope rati ons su ppo rt cre w du rin g the annual req ualif ication examinat ion in mit iga ting the conseq uences of ev ents in Scenar io SS-OP-90 4-10 12, "Dry w el l Pre ssu re In st. F ai ls/RR P ump Fai ls/Smal l LOCA/Pa rtia l Fai lu re o f E CC S on the si mul ator." The in spe ctors ev al uate d th e fol lo w in g area s:*
Initiating Events, Barrier Integrity, Mitigating Systems, andEmergency Preparedness1R01 Adverse Weather (71111.01)
li cen sed op erato r pe rf ormanc e;*
crew's cl ari ty an d formal ity of commun ic ati ons;*
abi li ty to take ti mel y ac tio ns in the co nse rv ati v e d ire cti on;*
pri ori tiz ati on, in terpre tati on, and v eri f ic ati on of ann unc ia tor a la rms;*
corre ct u se and i mpl emen tati on of abn ormal an d e mergency pro ced ures;*
con trol bo ard mani pul ati ons;*
ov ersi ght an d d ire cti on f rom su perv is ors; and*
abi li ty to id enti f y an d i mpl emen t ap prop ria te TS acti ons an d E mergency P la n acti ons an d n oti f ic ati ons.The c rew's pe rf ormanc e i n th ese are as w as compa red to p re-es tabl is hed op erato r a ct i o n e x p e ct a ti o n s a n d s u cc e ss ful c ri ti ca l t a sk co mp l e ti o n r e qui re me n t These acti v iti es compl eted on e qua rterl y l ic ens ed ope rator requal ifica tio n i nsp ecti on sampl F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 2 M a i n te n a n ce E ff e ct i v e n e ss (7 1 1 1 1.1 2 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs e v al uate d d egrade d p erformance is sue s i nv ol v in g the f ol lo w in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy stems:
8 En cl osu re*
Torus H arde ned V ent; and*
Re acto r W ater Cl ean up (RW CU) 'B' P ump Se al F ai lu re.T he ins pe ct or s a ss es se d pe r f or m an ce iss ue s wit h r es pe ct to th e r eli ab ilit y, a vaila bil it y, and condition m onitor ing of the syste Specif ically , the inspector s independent ly v e ri fie d t h e l i ce n se e's a ct i o n s to a d d re ss s y st e m p e rfor ma n ce o r co n d i ti o n p ro b l e ms i n t e r ms o f t h e fo l l o w i n g:*
imp le menti ng ap prop ria te w ork prac tic es;*
id enti f y in g and ad dres si ng common ca use fail ures;*
sc o p i n g o f sy st e ms i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th 1 0 C F R 5 0.6 5 (b);*
cha racte riz in g sy stem re li abi li ty i ssu es;*
t r ac k ing syst em una vaila bil it y;*
tr e n d i n g ke y p a ra me te rs (co n d i ti o n mo n i to ri n g);*
ens uri ng 10 C FR 50.65(a)(1) o r (a)(2) cl ass ifica tio n a nd/o r re-c la ssi f ic ati on; and*
v eri f y in g app ropri ate performance cri teri a for sy stems cl ass ifie d a s (a)(2) a nd/o r app ropri ate and ad equate goal s a nd corre cti v e a cti ons for sy stems cl ass ifie d a s (a)(1).In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d ma i n te n a n ce e ff e ct i v e n e ss i ss u e s w e re e n te re d i n to the corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted tw o qua rterl y mai nten anc e e f f ecti v ene ss in spe cti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 3 M a i n te n a n ce R i sk A ss e ss me n ts a n d E me rge n t W o rk C o n tr o l (7 1 1 1 1.1 3 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the li cen see's e v al uati on and man agement of pl ant ris k f or the mai nten anc e a nd ope rati ona l acti v iti es aff ecti ng ri sk-signi f ic ant and sa f ety-rel ated e q u ip m e n t li s t e d be lo w:*
Di v is io n I RH R Sa f ety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*
ED G 12 S afety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of Fe brua ry 4, 200 7;*
72E C-2 C M otor Co ntrol C ente r (M CC) C ontro l Transformer W ork duri ng the w eek of Fe brua ry 4, 200 7;*
Com bust ion Tur bine Gener ator 11-1 tr ip, rem oval of the Nort h Heater Drain Pu mp, a nd ED G 11 fail ure f rom se rv ic e d uri ng the w eek of Fe brua ry 18 , 20 07;and *
RC IC Sa f ety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of M arch 4, 200 7.These acti v iti es w ere sel ecte d b ase d o n th ei r po tenti al ri sk si gnifica nce rel ati v e to the reac tor s afety co rners tone As app li cab le for ea ch acti v ity , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the sc o p e o f ma i n te n a n ce w o rk, d i sc u ss e d t h e r e su l ts o f th e a ss e ss me n t w i th t h e l i ce n se e's p ro b a b i l i st i c ri sk a n a l y st a n d/o r sh i ft te ch n i ca l a d v i so r, a n d v e ri fie d p l a n t co n d i ti o n s w e re 9
En cl osu re con si sten t w ith the ri sk asse ssmen The i nsp ecto rs a ls o re v ie w ed TS requi rements an d w al ked do w n p orti ons of red und ant safety sy stems, w hen ap pl ic abl e, to v eri f y ri sk a n a l y si s a ss u mp ti o n s w e re v a l i d a n d a p p l i ca b l e r e qui re me n ts w e re me t.The se a ct i v i ti e s co mp l e te d fi v e qu a rt e rl y ma i n te n a n ce r i sk a ss e ss me n t a n d e me rge n t w ork con trol i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 15 Operab il ity E v al uati ons (71 111.15) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the f ol lo w in g CA RD s to en sure ei ther the con di tio n d id no t rend er th e i nv ol v ed equi pmen t i nop erab le or resu lt in an un reco gniz ed in crea se in pl ant ris k, and the li cen see ap prop ria tel y ap pl ie d TS li mita tio ns and ap prop ria tel y retu rned the aff ecte d e quip ment to a n o pera bl e s tatus:*
C A R D 0 6-2 7 7 9 4 , M i s-to rqu e d H i gh P re ss u re C o o l a n t In je ct i o n (H P C I)The rmo co u p l e Ga ske t;*
CA RD 06-28 12 4, Loo se Fle xible Con du it and Ju nc t ion Box;*
C A R D 0 6-2 7 6 6 4 , A u to ma ti c V o l ta ge R e gul a to r Ge n e ra l A l a rm; *
CA RD 07-206 58, Dry w el l Equi pmen t D rai n S ump; and *
CA RD 07-215 38, ED G Oil Le aks.These acti v iti es compl eted fiv e o pera bi li ty ev al uati ons i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R17 Perm anent Plant M odif ications (71111.17A) a.


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe fol l o w i n g e n gi n e e ri n g d e si gn p a cka ge w a s re v i e w e d a n d s e l e ct e d a sp e ct s w e re d i sc u ss e d w i th e n gi n e e ri n g p e rs o n n e l: *
The inspectors reviewed licensee procedures for mitigating the effects of cold weatherand high winds in the residual heat removal (RHR) complex and outside doors. Theinspectors performed walkdowns and reviewed severe weather procedures, emergencyplan implementing procedures related to severe weather, and annunciator responseprocedures. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed condition assessment resolutiondocuments (CARDs) and verified problems associated with adverse weather wereentered into the corrective action program with the appropriate significancecharacterization. These activities completed one cold weather systems inspection sample.
W o rk R e que st (W R) 0 0 0 Z 0 5 2 9 0 0 , R H R P u mp 'A' M o to r R e p l a ce me n t.Thi s d o cu me n t a n d r e l a te d d o cu me n ta ti o n w e re r e v i e w e d for a d e qua cy o f th e s a fety ev al uati on, con si dera tio n o f de si gn pa rameters , i mpl emen tati on of the modi f ic ati on, p o st-mo d i fic a ti o n t e st i n g, a n d r e l e v a n t p ro ce d u re s, d e si gn, a n d l i ce n si n g d o cu me n ts w ere prop erl y up date The mod ifica tio n w as f or e quip ment upgrad es of ex is tin g e qui p me n En cl osu reThese acti v iti es compl eted on e p ermane nt p la nt mo di f ic ati on in spe cti on sampl b.


====b. Findings====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 19 Po st-M ai nten anc e Tes tin g (711 11.1 9) a.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R04}}
==1R04 Equipment Alignments (71111.04).1==


Partial System Walkdown (71111.04Q)
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed pos t-main tena nce tes tin g (PM T) acti v iti es ass oci ated w ith the f ol lo w in g sche dul ed mai nten anc e:*
W R 000Z0600002 , Cont rol Room Annunciator Panel 601 and 602 Pow er Supply R e p l a ce me n t;*
7 2 E C-2 C M C C C o n t r o l T r a n s fo r me r W o r k;*
D i v i si o n I C o n tr o l C o mp l e x H V A C E me rge n cy M a keu p F a n; *
ED G 11 Tw enty-Fou r H our Ru n F ol lo w in g M ai nten anc e; a nd*
RC IC Fol lo w in g Val v e a nd Pu mp S eal M ai nten anc e.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the sco pe of the w ork performed and ev al uate d th e a dequa cy of the spe ci f ie d P M The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d th e P M T w as performed in ac cord anc e w ith ap prov ed proc edu res, the proc edu res cl earl y sta ted acc epta nce cri teri a, a nd the acc epta nce cri teri a w ere met. The in spe ctors in terv ie w ed ope rati ons , mai nten anc e, a nd engi nee rin g dep artment pers onn el an d re v ie w ed the compl eted P M T doc umen tati on.In a ddi tio n, th e i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d P M T prob le ms w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted fiv e P M T in spe cti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 22 Su rv ei ll anc e Tes tin g (711 11.2 2) a.


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the test resu lts for the foll ow in g acti v iti es to d etermi ne w heth er ri sk-si gni fic a n t sy st e ms a n d e qui p me n t w e re c a p a b l e o f pe rfor mi n g th e i r i n te n d e d s a fety f unc tio n a nd to v eri f y tes tin g w as con duc ted in ac cord anc e w ith ap pl ic abl e p roce dura l and TS re quire ments:*
The inspectors performed partial system walkdowns of the following risk-significantsystems:*
P ro ce d u re 2 4.1 3 9.0 2 , S ta n d b y L i qui d C o n tr o l Op e ra b i l i ty Te st;*
Torus Hardened Vent performed the week of January 21, 2007;*
W R W 419 070 100 , C al ib rate ED G 12 S erv ic e W ater Fl ow Lo op;*
Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) System performed the week ofMarch 18, 2007; and
W R 0 3 0 4 0 7 0 1 3 1 , P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.3 5 D i e se l Ge n e ra to r S e rv i ce W a te r, D i e se l F u e l Oi l Ta n k, a n d S ta rt i n g A i r Op e ra b i l i ty Te st; 11 En cl osu re*
* Division II RHR/Residual Heat Removal Service Water performed the weeksof March 11 and March 18, 2007.
Pro ced ure 24.0 00.0 2, R eac tor C ool ant Sy stem (R CS) Ope rati ona l Lea kag e; a nd*
P ro ce d u re 2 4.2 0 2.0 1 , H P C I P u mp Ti me R e sp o n se a n d Op e ra b i l i ty Te st.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the test method ol ogy an d te st re sul ts to v eri f y equi pmen t p e rfor ma n ce w a s co n si st e n t w i th s a fety a n a l y si s a n d d e si gn b a si s a ss u mp ti o n In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d s u rv e i l l a n ce t e st i n g p ro b l e ms w e re b e i n g e n te re d i n to the corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e ro uti ne surv ei ll anc es, one R CS l eak sa mpl e, a nd one in-serv ic e te st i nsp ecti on sampl e b.


The inspectors selected these systems based on their risk significance relative to thereactor safety cornerstones. The inspectors reviewed operating procedures, systemdiagrams, Technical Specification (TS) requirements, Administrative TS, and the impactof ongoing work activities on redundant trains of equipment in order to identifyconditions that could have rendered the systems incapable of performing their intendedfunctions. The inspectors also walked down accessible portions of the systems to verifysystem components were aligned correctly.In addition, the inspectors verified equipment alignment problems were entered into thecorrective action program with the appropriate significance characterization.These activities completed three quarterly partial system walkdown inspection samples.
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P2 Al ert a nd No tifica tio n S y stem E v al uati on (711 14.0 2) a.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peT h e i n s p e c t o r s r e v i e w e d a n d d i s c u s s e d w i t h E m e r g e n c y P r e p a r e d n e s s (E P) s t a ff reco rds f or th e o pera tio n, ma in tena nce an d te sti ng of the al ert a nd noti f ic ati on sy stem (AN S) f or th e F ermi 2 Pl ant Emergenc y P la nni ng Zo ne to v eri f y tha t the A NS equi pmen t w a s a d e qua te l y ma i n ta i n e d a n d t e st e d d u ri n g 2 0 0 5 , 2 0 0 6 , a n d 2 0 0 7 i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th emergency pl an commi tments and pro ced ure The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of 200 5 a nd 200 6 p rev enti v e ma in tena nce pe rf ormed on AN S equi pmen t to v eri f y tha t ann ual pre v enti v e ma in tena nce w as compl ete A ls o, th e i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sampl es of 200 5, 2 006 , an d 2 007 no n-sc hed ul ed mai nten anc e a cti v ity rec ords , to dete rmin e w h e th e r e qui p me n t tr o u b l e-s h o o ti n g a n d r e p a i rs w e re c o mp l e te d i n a t i me l y ma n n e r. Ad di tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of AN S tests con duc ted f rom M ay 20 05 throu gh Fe brua ry 20 07, to d etermi ne if Fe rmi EP sta f f w ere eff ecti v el y us in g the corre cti v e a cti on program to do cumen t, co rrect, and tren d i den tifie d s ire n p robl ems.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.
No findings of significance were identified..2 Complete System Walkdown (71111.04S)


====a. Inspection Scope====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P3 Emergenc y R esp ons e Organi z ati on Sta f f in g and A ugmentati on Sy stem (7 111 4.03) a.
The inspectors performed a complete system walkdown of the following risk-significantsystem:*
Core Spray System performed the week of January 14, 2007.The inspectors reviewed operating procedures, system diagrams, TS requirements, andapplicable sections of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) to ensure thecorrect system lineup. The inspectors verified acceptable material condition of systemcomponents, availability of electrical power to system components, and that ancillaryequipment or debris did not interfere with system performance. The inspectors walkeddown accessible portions of the system to verify system components were alignedcorrectly.These activities completed one semi-annual complete system walkdown inspectionsample.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d a n d d i sc u ss e d p ro ce d u re s o n t h e p ri ma ry a n d a l te rn a te proc ess es of augmenti ng the on-shi f t eme rgency res pon se organi z ati on (ER O). The inspect ors also di scus sed the EP sta f f's proces s f or m aintaining the Ferm i 2 Plant's ER O roste r an d E RO p erso nne l's c onta ct i nformatio The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of una nno unc ed off-hou rs a ugmentati ons of the on-shi f t E RO, w hi ch in cl ude d c al l-i n te st res ults bet w een June 2005 and Janua ry 2007, to det erm ine the adeq uacy of ERO members' res pon se and the us e o f the co rrecti v e a cti on program for i den tifie d re spo nse 12 En cl osu re p ro b l e m Th e i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d a s a mp l e o f tra i n i n g re co rd s for 4 5 E R O m e mb e rs w ho w ere ass igne d to key an d s upp ort p osi tio ns to v eri f y tha t the y w ere curre ntl y trai ned f or th ei r as si gned pos iti ons.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R05}}
==1R05 Fire Protection (71111.05).1==


Routine Resident Inspector Tours (71111.05Q)
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P5 Co rrecti on of Emergency P repa redn ess W eaknes ses (71 114.05) a.


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed Nu cl ear Ov ersi ght Sta f f's (N OS) 2 005 an d 2 006 au di ts o f the li cen see's E P program to v eri f y tha t the se in dep end ent ass ess ments met the req uirem ents of 10 CFR 50.5 4(t). T he inspect ors revi ew ed sam ple recor ds of EP d ri l l s a n d e x e rc i se s co n d u ct e d d u ri n g 2 0 0 5 a n d 2 0 0 6 t o v e ri fy t h a t th e se a ct i v i ti e s w e re ade quatel y cri tique Sa mpl es of correc tiv e a cti on program re cord s a nd ass oci ated corre cti v e a cti ons w ere rev ie w ed to d etermi ne if w eaknes ses an d d efici enc ie s i den tifie d in the f ollow ing types of self-as sess me nts w ere adeq uate ly addres sed: crit iqu es of EP d r i l l s a n d e x e r c i s e s; N O S 2 0 0 5 a n d 2 0 0 6 s t a t i o n E P a u d i t s; a n d F e r m i P l a n t E P s t a ff 200 6 a nd 200 7 s el f-ass ess ments.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.
The inspectors conducted fire protection tours of the following risk-significant plantareas:
* Division II Control Complex Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)Room performed the week of January 7, 2007;*
Standby Liquid Control Pump Area performed the week of January 14, 2007;*
Torus Room Basement performed the week of January 21, 2007;*
Division I Switchgear Room performed the week of January 28, 2007;*
Reactor Building Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Room performedthe week of March 25, 2007; and*
Control Room performed the week of March 24, 2007.The inspectors verified fire zone conditions were consistent with assumptions in thelicensee's Fire Hazards


=====Analysis.=====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P6 Dri ll E v al uati on (711 14.0 6) a.
The inspectors walked down fire detection andsuppression equipment, assessed the material condition of fire fighting equipment,and evaluated the control of transient combustible materials. In addition, the inspectorsverified fire protection related problems were entered into the corrective action programwith the appropriate significance characterization.These activities completed six quarterly fire protection - tour inspection samples.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the li cen see pe rf orm a n E P dri ll on M arch 21 , 20 0 The i n sp e ct o rs o b se rv e d a ct i v i ti e s i n t h e c o n tr o l r o o m s i mu l a to r, t e ch n i ca l s u p p o rt c e n te r, a n d e me rge n cy o p e ra ti o n s fac i l i t Th e i n sp e ct o rs a l so a tt e n d e d t h e p o st-d ri l l fac i l i ty crit iqu es in the techn ical support center and emer g ency operat ions f acility imm ediately f ol lo w in g the dri ll. The f ocu s o f the i nsp ecto rs' ac tiv iti es w as to n ote any w eaknes ses and de f ic ie nci es in the dri ll pe rf ormanc e a nd ens ure the li cen see ev al uato rs n oted the same w eaknes ses an d d efici enc ie s a nd ente red them in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on progra The i nsp ecto rs p la ced emp has is on ob serv ati ons regard in g ev ent cl ass ifica tio n, n oti f ic ati ons , pro tecti v e a cti on reco mmenda tio ns, and si te e v acu ati on and ac cou ntab il ity ac tiv iti e A s p art o f the i nsp ecti on, the in spe ctors rev ie w ed the d ri l l p a cka ge i n cl u d e d i n t h e l i st o f do cu me n ts r e v i e w e d a t th e e n d o f th i s re p o rt.These acti v iti es compl eted on e d ril l ev al uati on in spe cti on sampl En cl osu re b.
No findings of significance were identified1R06 Flood Protection (71111.06)


====a. Inspection Scope====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.2.
The inspectors performed an inspection related to the licensee's precautions to mitigatethe risk from internal flooding events. The inspectors performed a walkdown of thefollowing plant area to assess the adequacy of watertight doors and verify drains andsumps were clear of debris and were operable:*
Flood Doors and Barriers Inside Power Block.The inspectors also reviewed the work activities associated with internal flooding toverify identified problems were being entered into the corrective action program withthe appropriate characterization and significance.These activities completed one internal flood protection inspection sample.


====b. Findings====
RA DI A TIO N SA FE TYC o rn e rs to n e: Oc c u p a ti o n a l R a d ia ti o n S a fe ty 2OS3 Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Instru mentati on and P rotec tiv e E quip ment (711 21.0 3).1 Insp ecti on Pl ann in g a.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R07}}
==1R07 Heat Sink Performance (71111.07A)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peT he inspect ors revi ew ed the Fer mi Pow er Plant Unit 2 UFSAR to identif y applicable radi ati on moni tors ass oci ated w ith mea suri ng tran si ent hi gh an d v ery hi gh rad ia tio n area s i ncl udi ng tho se use d i n re mote emergency as ses smen The in spe ctors id enti f ie d t h e t y p e s o f p o r t a b l e r a d i a t i o n d e t e c t i o n i n s t r u me n t a t i o n u s e d fo r j o b c o v e r a ge o f h i gh radi ati on area w ork i ncl udi ng i nstru ments use d for u nde rw ater surv ey s, fix ed area radi ati on moni tors use d to pro v id e ra di ol ogica l in f ormati on in v ari ous pl ant area s, a nd con tin uou s a ir moni tors use d to as ses s a irb orne rad io lo gical co ndi tio ns and w ork area s with th e po t en t ial f or w or k er s t o r ec eive a 50 m illir em or g r ea t er co m m it t ed ef f ec t ive dos e e quiv al en C onta min ati on moni tors, w hol e b ody co unte rs a nd thos e ra di ati on dete cti on in strumen ts u til iz ed f or th e re le ase of pe rson nel , an d e quip ment f rom the radi ol ogica ll y res tric ted area w ere al so id enti f ie d.These acti v iti es compl eted tw o i nsp ecti on sampl e b.
The inspectors reviewed completed test reports for emergency diesel generators(EDGs) 11, 12, 13, and 14 jacket coolant systems, lube oil, and air coolant system heat exchangers. The inspectors selected these heat exchangers because their associatedsystems were risk significant in the licensee's risk assessment and were required tosupport the operability of other risk-significant, safety-related equipment. During theseinspections, the inspectors reviewed applicable documents and procedures. In addition,the inspectors verified heat sink problems were entered into the corrective actionprogram with the appropriate significance characterization and completed correctiveactions were adequate and appropriately implemented. These activities completed one heat sink performance inspection sample.


====b. Findings====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 W al kdow ns of Rad ia tio n M oni tori ng Instru mentati on a.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R11}}
==1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification (71111.11Q)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d w al kdow ns of sel ecte d a rea radi ati on moni tors (AR M s)in the mai n c ontro l room, tu rbi ne, radi oac tiv e w aste , an d re acto r bu il di ngs to v eri f y the y w ere lo cate d a s d esc rib ed in the U FS AR an d w ere opti mal ly po si tio ned rel ati v e to the pote nti al so urce (s) o f rad ia tio n th ey w ere in tend ed to mo ni tor a nd to v eri f y tha t co ntrol ro o m i n st ru me n t re a d o u t a n d h i gh a l a rm se tp o i n ts for t h o se A R M s w e re c o n si st e n t w i th UF SA R in f ormati on and ac tual fiel d c ond iti on W al kdow ns w ere al so con duc ted of thos e a reas w here po rtabl e s urv ey i nstru ments w ere cal ib rated/repa ire d a nd mai ntai ned f or ra di ati on prote cti on staff us e to de termin e i f tho se in strumen ts d esi gnated "read y for use" w ere suff ic ie nt i n n umbe r to sup port the radi ati on prote cti on program, h ad curre nt ca lib r at ion st ic k er s, w er e op er ab le, and w er e in g oo d ph ysic al c on dit io Ad dit ion all y, the in spe ctors obs erv ed the li cen see's i nstru ment cal ib rati on uni ts a nd the radi ati on sou rces us ed f or i nstru ment che cks to ass ess the ir materi al co ndi tio n a nd di scu sse d 14 En cl osu re thei r us e w ith R P staff to dete rmin e i f the y w ere use d a dequa tel L ic ens ee pers onn el w e re a l so o b se rv e d p e rfor mi n g s o u rc e c h e cks o f se l e ct e d i n st ru me n ts a s th e y w e re l o gged-o u t for u s These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.
On February 8, 2007, the inspectors observed an operations support crew during theannual requalification examination in mitigating the consequences of events in ScenarioSS-OP-904-1012, "Drywell Pressure Inst. Fails/RR Pump Fails/Small LOCA/PartialFailure of ECCS on the simulator."  The inspectors evaluated the following areas:*
licensed operator performance;*
crew's clarity and formality of communications;*
ability to take timely actions in the conservative direction;*
prioritization, interpretation, and verification of annunciator alarms;*
correct use and implementation of abnormal and emergency procedures;*
control board manipulations;*
oversight and direction from supervisors; and*
ability to identify and implement appropriate TS actions and Emergency Planactions and notifications.The crew's performance in these areas was compared to pre-established operatoraction expectations and successful critical task completion requirements. These activities completed one quarterly licensed operator requalification inspectionsample.


====b. Findings====
F i n d i n gsN o fi n d i n gs o f si gni fic a n ce w e re i d e n ti fie d. .3 Ca li brati on and Testi ng of Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Instru mentati on a.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R12}}
==1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness (71111.12Q)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs s e l e ct i v e l y r e v i e w e d r a d i o l o gi ca l i n st ru me n ta ti o n a ss o ci a te d w i th moni tori ng tran si ent hi gh an d/or v ery hi gh rad ia tio n a reas , i nstru ments use d for remote emergency as ses sment and rad ia tio n mo ni tors use d to i den tify pe rson nel co n ta mi n a ti o n a n d for a ss e ss me n t o f i n te rn a l e x p o su re s to v e ri fy t h a t th e i n st ru me n ts h a d b e e n c a l i b ra te d a s re qui re d b y t h e l i ce n se e's p ro ce d u re s, c o n si st e n t w i th i n d u st ry and regul atory sta nda rd The in spe ctors al so rev ie w ed al arm se tpoi nts f or s el ecte d AR M s to v eri f y tha t the y w ere esta bl is hed co nsi sten t w ith the U FS AR an d TSs , as app li cab l S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed cal ib rati on proc edu res and the most re ce n t ca l i b ra ti o n r e co rd s a n d/o r so u rc e c h a ra ct e ri z a ti o n/o u tp u t v e ri fic a ti o n d o cu me n ts f or th e fol lo w in g radi ati on moni tori ng i nstru mentati on and i nstru ment cal ib rati on e qui p me n t:*
The inspectors evaluated degraded performance issues involving the followingrisk-significant systems:
C o n ta i n me n t H i gh R a n ge A R M s (b o th d i v i si o n s);*
* Torus Hardened Vent; and*
M a i n C o n tr o l R o o m (C h a n n e l 6);*
Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) 'B' Pump Seal Failure.The inspectors assessed performance issues with respect to the reliability, availability,and condition monitoring of the system. Specifically, the inspectors independentlyverified the licensee's actions to address system performance or condition problemsin terms of the following:*
Tra v e rs i n g In-C o re P ro b e R o o m A R M (C h a n n e l 1 2);*
implementing appropriate work practices;*
R e fue l F l o o r A R M s (C h a n n e l s 1 5 a n d 1 7);*
identifying and addressing common cause failures;*
N e w F u e l S to ra ge V a u l t (C h a n n e l 1 6);*
scoping of systems in accordance with 10 CFR 50.65(b);*
Smal l Arti cl es M oni tors use d a t pl ant egress poi nts;*
characterizing system reliability issues;*
J. L. S h e p h e rd I n st ru me n t C a l i b ra to r;*
tracking system unavailability;*
Po rtabl e s urv ey i nstru ments use d for u nde rw ater surv ey s;*
trending key parameters (condition monitoring);*
S ta n d u p W h o l e B o d y C o u n te r; *
ensuring 10 CFR 50.65(a)(1) or (a)(2) classification and/or re-classification; and*
Po rtal M oni tors use d a t the P rima ry A cce ss Po rtal; an d*
verifying appropriate performance criteria for systems classified as (a)(2) and/orappropriate and adequate goals and corrective actions for systems classified as(a)(1).In addition, the inspectors verified maintenance effectiveness issues were entered intothe corrective action program with the appropriate significance characterization.These activities completed two quarterly maintenance effectiveness inspection samples.
Pe rson nel C onta min ati on M oni tors use d a t the egress po in ts.The i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned w hat acti ons w ere taken w hen , an d d uri ng cal ib rati on or sou rce che cks, an i nstru ment w as f oun d s igni f ic antl y ou t of cal ib rati on or e x cee ded as-found ac cep tanc e c rite ri S hou ld tha t oc cur, the in spe ctors v eri f ie d th at th e li cen see's ac tio ns w oul d i ncl ude a dete rmin ati on of the in strumen t's pre v io us usa ges a n d t h e p o ss i b l e c o n se que n ce s o f th a t u se , si n ce t h e p ri o r ca l i b ra ti o Th e i n sp e ct o rs al so rev ie w ed the li cen see's 10 C FR P art 6 1 s ourc e te rm i nformatio n to de termin e i f the ca l i b ra ti o n s o u rc e s u se d w e re r e p re se n ta ti v e o f th e p l a n t so u rc e t e rm a n d t h a t d i ff i cu l t to d e te ct n u cl i d e s w e re s ca l e d i n to w h o l e b o d y c o u n t d o se d e te rmi n a ti o n These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl En cl osu re b.


====b. Findings====
F i n d i n gsIntrod ucti on: The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d a n a ss o ci a te d N o n-C i te d V i o l a ti o n o f N R C r e qui re me n ts for t h e fai l u re t o ma i n ta i n a d e qua te p ro ce d u re s for th e c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s (D 1 1-K 8 1 6 A a n d B). De scri pti on: The con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M s a re u sed to f aci li tate the ev al uati on of core da mage i n th e e v ent of a p ostu la ted acc id ent and are al so use d a s A RM s d uri ng pl ant ope rati ons , sh utdo w n, a nd und er a cci den t co ndi tio n The des ign, use , an d mai nten anc e o f the se moni tors is de scri bed i n th e s tati on UF SA R and the rad io lo gical e me rge n cy r e sp o n se p re p a re d n e ss p l a The i nsp ecto rs i den tifie d th at i n 2 001 the l ic ens ee rev is ed pl ant tech ni cal pro ced ures f or th e c al ib rati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M That re v is io n e li min ated the re qui re me n t th a t th e c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s b e p e rfor me d w i th a tra cea bl e, know n s ourc e o f rad io acti v it S in ce that time , the 18-month cal ib rati on w as redu ced to an el ectro ni c c al ib rati on of the in strumen t w ith on ly a qual ita tiv e v eri f ic ati on of d e te ct o r re sp o n se. The i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the ch ange to th e l ic ens ee's p roce dure res ul ted in an in compl ete cal ib rati on of the in strumen t w hi ch f ai le d to pro v id e a ssu ranc e th at th e in strumen t w oul d a ccu ratel y res pon As f urthe r de scri bed i n N UR EG 0 737 , the ca l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s a re t o i n cl u d e a s i n gl e p o i n t i n-s i tu cal ib rati on that ex pos es the dete ctors to a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n i n th e ra nge o f 1 R e m/h r to 1 0 R e m/h r. P ri o r to 1 9 9 9 , th e l i ce n se e's TS s co n ta i n e d a r e qui re me n t to p e rfor m a s i n gl e p o i n t i n-s i tu cal ib rati on and ex pos e th e c onta in ment hi gh ran ge rad ia tio n d etec tors to a know n s ourc e of radi ati on in the ran ge of 1 R em/hr to 10 R em/h Ho w ev er, th e d etai l of thi s c al ib rati on requi rement w as del eted w hen the l ic ens ee trans iti one d to Improv ed Techni cal S p e ci fic a ti o n s i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th l i ce n se a me n d me n t 1 3 4 , d a te d S e p te mb e r 3 0 , 1 9 9 9. Al thou gh, the li cen see i ndi cate d to the i nsp ecto rs th at n o c han ge i n d etec tor c al ib rati on proto col w as in tend ed w ith the i mpl emen tati on of Improv ed Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns, s t a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s 6 2.1 2 0.0 4 0 a n d 6 2.1 2 0.0 4 1 fo r t h e c a l i b r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t a i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s w e re c h a n ged i n 2 0 0 Th a t ch a n ge e l i mi n a te d t h e r e qui re me n t for a qua n ti ta ti v e r a d i a ti o n c h e ck a s a p a rt o f th e i n st ru me n t ca l i b ra ti o n. An al y si s: The fail ure to a dequa tel y mai ntai n p roce dure s for the ca li brati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M s w as dete rmin ed to b e a pe rf ormanc e d efici enc y as de f in ed i n N R C I n sp e ct i o n M a n u a l C h a p te r (I M C) 0 6 1 2 , "P o w e r R e a ct o r In sp e ct i o n R e p o rt s,"Ap pen di x B , "Issu e S cree ni ng." S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t no t ca li brati ng th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s u si n g ra d i a ti o n s o u rc e s o f kno w n v a l u e s w a s mo re than mi nor bec aus e i t w as ass oci ated w ith the Occu pati ona l Ra di ati on Sa f ety co rners tone attri bute of Pl ant Fac il iti es/E quip ment and Ins trumenta tio n a nd aff ecte d th e c orne rston e o b je ct i v e o f en su ri n g a d e qua te p ro te ct i o n o f w o rke r h e a l th a n d s a fety fro m e x p o su re t o radi ati on f rom ra di oac tiv e ma teri al s d uri ng ci v il ia n n ucl ear reac tor o pera tio Therefore, the is sue w as greater th an min or a nd repre sen ted a fin di ng w hi ch w as ev al uate d u si ng th e S i gni fic a n ce D e te rmi n a ti o n P ro ce ss (S D P).
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R13}}
==1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control (71111.13Q)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
16 En cl osu reSince the f inding inv olv ed ARM s, t he inspect ors utiliz ed IM C 0609, Appendix C
The inspectors reviewed the licensee's evaluation and management of plant risk forthe maintenance and operational activities affecting risk-significant and safety-relatedequipment listed below:*
,"Oc cu p a ti o n a l R a d i a ti o n S a fety S D P ," t o a ss e ss i ts s i gni fic a n c Th e i n sp e ct o rs concluded that the issue did not inv olv e as-low-as-is-
Division I RHR Safety System Outage during the week of January 21, 2007;*
reas onably-achievable pl ann in g or w ork con trol s, th ere w as no ov erex pos ure or s ubs tanti al po tenti al for an ov erex pos ure to th e w orker, an d th e l ic ens ee's a bi li ty to ass ess do se w as not compro mise Co nse quentl y , the i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the S DP as ses sment for th e fi n d i n g w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce (Gre e n). The i n sp e ct o rs a l so r e v i e w e d t h e i ss u e a n d d e te rmi n e d t h a t n o c ro ss-c u tt i n g a sp e ct s w ere id enti f ie d i n th e a reas of hu man performance , pro bl em i den tifica tio n a nd reso lu tio n, o r sa fety c o n sc i o u s w o rk e n v i ro n me n t. En f orce ment: Techni cal S pec ifica tio n 5.4.1 requi res that w ritte n p roce dure s b e e st a b l i sh e d , i mp l e me n te d , a n d ma i n ta i n e d for a ct i v i ti e s l i st e d i n R e gul a to ry Gui de 1.33 , R ev is io n 2 , A ppe ndi x A , Fe brua ry 19 7 R egul atory Gui de 1.33 de f in es the q uality assur ance pr og ram req uirem ents f or nuclear pow er plant s and Appendix A, Se cti on 7, s tep f. sp eci f ie s p roce dure s for the A RM Co ntrary to the abo v e, th e l ic ens ee d i d n o t ma i n ta i n a d e qua te c a l i b ra ti o n p ro ce d u re s for th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s. S i n c e 2 0 0 1 , F e r mi S t a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s fo r t h e c a l i b r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t a i n me n t h i gh r a n ge AR M s d id no t i ncl ude a quanti tati v e re spo nse to a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n a s a pa rt of th e i n st ru me n t ca l i b ra ti o n w h i ch r e su l te d i n a n i n co mp l e te c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e i n st ru me n t. As an immed ia te c orrec tio n a cti on, the li cen see pe rf ormed an ev al uati on and de termin ed that the moni tor w as f unc tio nal ba sed on i ts a dequa te re spo nse to ambi ent radi ati on le v el The l ic ens ee al so pl ann ed to re v is e a ppl ic abl e p roce dure s to pe rf orm the calibrat ions using appropr iate rad ioactive source Since the li cense e docum ente d this is sue i n i ts c orrec tiv e a cti on program (C AR D 07-2 161 6), a nd bec aus e th is find in g is of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce , i t i s b ei ng trea ted as a N on-C ite d V io la tio n (N C V 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 7 0 0 2-0 1)..4 Pro bl em Id enti f ic ati on and R eso lu tio n a.
EDG 12 Safety System Outage during the week of February 4, 2007;*
72EC-2C Motor Control Center (MCC) Control Transformer Work during theweek of February 4, 2007;*
Combustion Turbine Generator 11-1 trip, removal of the North Heater DrainPump, and EDG 11 failure from service during the week of February 18, 2007;and
* RCIC Safety System Outage during the week of March 4, 2007.These activities were selected based on their potential risk significance relative to thereactor safety cornerstones. As applicable for each activity, the inspectors reviewed thescope of maintenance work, discussed the results of the assessment with the licensee'sprobabilistic risk analyst and/or shift technical advisor, and verified plant conditions were consistent with the risk assessment. The inspectors also reviewed TS requirements andwalked down portions of redundant safety systems, when applicable, to verify riskanalysis assumptions were valid and applicable requirements were met.These activities completed five quarterly maintenance risk assessment and emergent work control inspection samples.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see co ndi tio n a sse ssmen t res ol uti on doc umen ts (C AR Ds)a n d a n y s p e ci a l r e p o rt s th a t i n v o l v e d p e rs o n n e l c o n ta mi n a ti o n mo n i to r a l a rms d u e t o pers onn el i ntern al ex pos ures to v eri f y tha t i den tifie d p robl ems w ere ente red in to th e corre cti v e a cti on program for res ol uti o Li cen see au di ts a nd CA RD s w ere al so rev ie w ed to v eri f y tha t de f ic ie nci es and pro bl ems w ith rad io lo gical i nstru mentati on, the radi ati on moni tori ng sy stem o r se lf-conta in ed brea thi ng ap para tus (SC BA) w ere id enti f ie d, ch a ra ct e ri z e d , p ri o ri ti z e d , a n d r e so l v e d e ff e ct i v e l y u si n g th e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed corre cti v e a cti on program re ports rel ated to ex pos ure si gnifica nt radi ol ogica l in ci den ts th at i nv ol v ed radi ati on moni tori ng i nstru ment defici enc ie s s in ce the l a st i n sp e ct i o n i n t h i s a re a , a s a p p l i ca b l M e mb e rs o f th e r a d i a ti o n p ro te ct i o n s ta ff w e re in terv ie w ed and co rrecti v e a cti on doc umen ts w ere rev ie w ed to v eri f y tha t foll ow-up a ct i v i ti e s w e re b e i n g c o n d u ct e d i n a n e ff e ct i v e a n d t i me l y ma n n e r co mme n su ra te w i th t h e i r i mp o r t a n c e t o s a fe t y a n d r i s k b a s e d o n t h e fo l l o w i n g:
No findings of significance were identified.
17 En cl osu re*
{{a|1R15}}
I n i t i a l p r o b l e m i d e n t i fi c a t i o n , c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n , a n d t r a c ki n g;*
==1R15 Operability Evaluations (71111.15)==
Di spo si tio n o f op erab il ity/repo rtabi li ty i ssu es;*
Ev al uati on of safety si gnifica nce/ris k and pri ori ty for reso lu tio n;*
Iden tifica tio n o f rep eti tiv e p robl ems;*
Iden tifica tio n o f co ntri buti ng cau ses; an d*
Iden tifica tio n a nd imp le mentati on of ef f ecti v e c orrec tiv e a cti ons.The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d i f th e l i ce n se e's se l f-as se ss me n t a n d/o r a u d i t a ct i v i ti e s w e re identif yi ng and address ing repet itive def iciencies or sig nif icant indivi dual def iciencies in p ro b l e m i d e n ti fic a ti o n a n d r e so l u ti o These rev ie w s re pres ente d th ree in spe cti on sampl e b.


====a. Inspection Scope====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..5 Ra di ati on Pro tecti on Techni ci an Instru ment Use a.
The inspectors reviewed the following CARDs to ensure either the condition did notrender the involved equipment inoperable or result in an unrecognized increase in plantrisk, and the licensee appropriately applied TS limitations and appropriately returned theaffected equipment to an operable status:*
CARD 06-27794, Mis-torqued High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI)Thermocouple Gasket;*
CARD 06-28124, Loose Flexible Conduit and Junction Box;*
CARD 06-27664, Automatic Voltage Regulator General Alarm;
* CARD 07-20658, Drywell Equipment Drain Sump; and
* CARD 07-21538, EDG Oil Leaks.These activities completed five operability evaluations inspection samples.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs s el ecti v el y v eri f ie d th at c al ib rati ons for tho se in strumen ts re cen tly us ed and for tho se des igna ted f or u se had no t l aps e The in spe ctors rev ie w ed in strumen t lo gs to v eri f y tha t res pon se che cks of porta bl e s urv ey i nstru ments w ere compl eted pri or to i nstru ment use an d u pon retu rn o f the i nstru ment to th e s torage area after u se, as requi red by the l ic ens ee's p roce dur The i nsp ecto rs a ls o d is cus sed i nstru ment cal ib rati on method s a nd sou rce resp ons e c hec k practi ces w ith rad ia tio n p rotec tio n st a ff a n d o b se rv e d s ta ff c o mp l e te i n st ru me n t o p e ra b i l i ty c h e cks p ri o r to u s These rev ie w s re pres ente d o ne in spe cti on sampl b.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R17}}
==1R17 Permanent Plant Modifications (71111.17A)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..6 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s (S CB A) M ai nten anc e/Ins pec tio n a nd Use r Trai ni ng a.
The following engineering design package was reviewed and selected aspects werediscussed with engineering personnel:
* Work Request (WR) 000Z052900, RHR Pump 'A' Motor Replacement.This document and related documentation were reviewed for adequacy of the safetyevaluation, consideration of design parameters, implementation of the modification,post-modification testing, and relevant procedures, design, and licensing documentswere properly updated. The modification was for equipment upgrades of existingequipment.


These activities completed one permanent plant modification inspection sample.
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed asp ects of the li cen see's res pi ratory pro tecti on program for com pliance w ith the r eq uirem ents of Subpart H of 10 CFR Part 20 and to deter mine if S C B A w a s p ro p e rl y ma i n ta i n e d a n d r e a d y for e me rge n cy u s Th e i n sp e ct o rs rev ie w ed the statu s, mai nten anc e, a nd surv ei ll anc e re cord s o f S CB As staged and read y-f or-em erg ency use i n v arious areas of the plant and asses sed the li cense e's cap abi li ty for refil li ng an d tra nsp orti ng SC BA ai r bo ttle s to an d from the co ntrol roo m a n d o p e ra ti o n s su p p o rt c e n te r (OS C) d u ri n g e me rge n cy c o n d i ti o n The i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d t h a t se l e ct e d c o n tr o l r o o m s ta ff d e si gna te d for t h e a ct i v e o n-s h i ft d u ty r o st e r, in cl udi ng tho se in di v id ual s o n th e s tati on's fire bri gade, w ere trai ned , res pi rator f it teste d, and me dically cert if ied to use SCBA Additionally , the inspector s review ed SCBA 18 En cl osu re qual ifica tio ns f or th e e mergency res pon se organi z ati on's ra di ol ogica l emergency tea m to d etermi ne if a suff ic ie nt n umbe r of staff w ere qual ifie d to fulfil l emergency res pon se pos iti ons to meet the requi rements of 10 C FR 50.4 The in spe ctors al so rev ie w ed resp ira tory pro tecti on trai ni ng l ess on pl ans to ass ess the ir ov eral l ade quacy for compl ia nce w ith S ubp art H , an d to v eri f y tha t pe rson al S CB A ai r bo ttle ch ange-o ut w as ade quatel y co v ered.The i nsp ecto rs w al ked do w n th e b ottl ed ai r su ppl y rac k and spa re a ir bottl e s tati ons locate d outside th e main cont rol room and inspected SCBA eq uipme nt m aintained in the con trol roo m an d S CB A equi pmen t sta ged for emergen cy us e i n v ari ous are as of the plan During the w alk downs, the inspect ors ex am ined several SCB A units to asse ss the ir materi al co ndi tio n, to v eri f y tha t ai r bo ttle hy dros tati c te sts w ere curre nt, a nd to v eri f y tha t bottl es w ere pres suri z ed to me et p roce dura l requi rement The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of SC BA equi pmen t i nsp ecti on and functi ona l testi ng an d o bse rv ed sel ecte d ope rati ons pe rson nel i nsp ect, don , do f f , an d u se SC BA ai r pa cks to dete rmin e i f the se a ct i v i ti e s w e re p e rfor me d c o n si st e n t w i th p ro ce d u re a n d t h e e qui p me n t ma n u fac tu re rs reco mmenda tio n The in spe ctors al so ens ured tha t the requi red, peri odi c a ir cy li nde r hy dros tati c te sti ng w as doc umen ted and up to date , an d th at th e D epa rtment o f T rans port ation re q uired ret est air cy linder mar k ing s w ere in place f or several rando mly sel ecte d S CB A uni t Ad di tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed v end or tra in in g certi f ic ates for thos e i ndi v id ual s i nv ol v ed in the rep ai r of SC BA pre ssu re re gula tors to d etermi ne if tho se p e rs o n n e l t h a t p e rfor me d ma i n te n a n ce o n c o mp o n e n ts v i ta l t o e qui p me n t fun ct i o n w e re qual ifie The mos t rec ent v ita l compo nen t (regul ator) test reco rds w ere rev ie w ed by the in spe ctors f or s el ecte d S CB A equi pmen t cu rrentl y de si gnated f or e mergency us e.These rev ie w s re pres ente d tw o i nsp ecti on sampl e b.


====b. Findings====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.4.
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|1R19}}
==1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing (71111.19)==


====a. Inspection Scope====
O T H E R AC T I V I T I E S (O A)Co rne rsto nes: Initiatin g Ev ents , Mitigatin g Sy stems , B arrie r In tegr ity , an d Emer gen cy P rep are dne ss 4OA1 Pe rf ormanc e In di cato r V eri f ic ati on (711 51).1 Re acto r S afety S trategic A rea a.
The inspectors reviewed post-maintenance testing (PMT) activities associated with thefollowing scheduled maintenance:*
WR 000Z0600002, Control Room Annunciator Panel 601 and 602 Power SupplyReplacement;*
72EC-2C MCC Control Transformer Work;*
Division I Control Complex HVAC Emergency Makeup Fan;
* EDG 11 Twenty-Four Hour Run Following Maintenance; and*
RCIC Following Valve and Pump Seal Maintenance.The inspectors reviewed the scope of the work performed and evaluated the adequacyof the specified PMT. The inspectors verified the PMT was performed in accordancewith approved procedures, the procedures clearly stated acceptance criteria, and theacceptance criteria were met. The inspectors interviewed operations, maintenance, andengineering department personnel and reviewed the completed PMT documentation.In addition, the inspectors verified PMT problems were entered into the corrective actionprogram with the appropriate significance characterization.These activities completed five PMT inspection samples.


====b. Findings====
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs s ampl ed the li cen see's su bmi ttal s for the pe rf ormanc e i ndi cato rs (P Is)li sted be lo The i nsp ecto rs u sed P I de f in iti ons an d gui dan ce con tai ned i n R ev is io n 4 of Nu cl ear En ergy Ins titu te D ocu ment 99-0 2, "R egul atory A sse ssmen t P erformance Indi cato r Gui del in e," to v eri f y the ac cura cy of the P I da t The foll ow in g PIs w ere rev ie w ed:
No findings of significance were identified.
19 En cl osu re*
{{a|1R22}}
Un pl ann ed Scra ms;*
==1R22 Surveillance Testing (71111.22)==
Scra ms w ith Loss of Norm al Heat Removal;
 
*
====a. Inspection Scope====
Un pl ann ed Po w er C han ges; an d *
The inspectors reviewed the test results for the following activities to determine whetherrisk-significant systems and equipment were capable of performing their intended safetyfunction and to verify testing was conducted in accordance with applicable proceduraland TS requirements:*
RC S Lea kag e.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sel ecte d a ppl ic abl e c ond iti ons an d d ata f rom l ogs, l ic ens ee ev ent repo rts, a nd CA RD s from Jan uary 20 05 throu gh Jan uary 20 07, f or e ach P I are a s pec ifie d abo v The i nsp ecto rs i nde pen den tly re-p erformed ca lc ul ati ons w here ap pl ic abl The inspect ors comp ared that inf orm ation to the inf orm ation re q uired f or each PI def inition in t he g uid eli ne to ens ur e t he lice ns ee re po r t ed th e da t a c or r ec t ly.These acti v iti es compl eted four p erformance in di cato r i nsp ecti on sampl e b.
Procedure 24.139.02, Standby Liquid Control Operability Test;*
WR W419070100, Calibrate EDG 12 Service Water Flow Loop;*
WR 0304070131, Perform 24.307.35 Diesel Generator Service Water,Diesel Fuel Oil Tank, and Starting Air Operability Test;
* Procedure 24.000.02, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Operational Leakage; and*
Procedure 24.202.01, HPCI Pump Time Response and Operability Test.The inspectors reviewed the test methodology and test results to verify equipmentperformance was consistent with safety analysis and design basis assumptions. Inaddition, the inspectors verified surveillance testing problems were being entered intothe corrective action program with the appropriate significance characterization.These activities completed three routine surveillances, one RCS leak sample, and onein-service test inspection samples.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.1EP2 Alert and Notification System Evaluation (71114.02)
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed and discussed with Emergency Preparedness (EP) staffrecords for the operation, maintenance and testing of the alert and notification system(ANS) for the Fermi 2 Plant Emergency Planning Zone to verify that the ANS equipmentwas adequately maintained and tested during 2005, 2006, and 2007 in accordance withemergency plan commitments and procedures. The inspectors reviewed records of2005 and 2006 preventive maintenance performed on ANS equipment to verify thatannual preventive maintenance was completed. Also, the inspectors reviewed samplesof 2005, 2006, and 2007 non-scheduled maintenance activity records, to determinewhether equipment trouble-shooting and repairs were completed in a timely manner. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed records of ANS tests conducted from May 2005through February 2007, to determine if Fermi EP staff were effectively using thecorrective action program to document, correct, and trend identified siren problems.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.1EP3 Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation System (71114.03)
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed and discussed procedures on the primary and alternateprocesses of augmenting the on-shift emergency response organization (ERO). Theinspectors also discussed the EP staff's process for maintaining the Fermi 2 Plant'sERO roster and ERO personnel's contact information. The inspectors reviewed recordsof unannounced off-hours augmentations of the on-shift ERO, which included call-in testresults between June 2005 and January 2007, to determine the adequacy of EROmembers' response and the use of the corrective action program for identified response problems. The inspectors reviewed a sample of training records for 45 ERO memberswho were assigned to key and support positions to verify that they were currently trainedfor their assigned positions.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.1EP5 Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses (71114.05)
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed Nuclear Oversight Staff's (NOS) 2005 and 2006 audits ofthe licensee's EP program to verify that these independent assessments met therequirements of 10 CFR 50.54(t). The inspectors reviewed sample records of EPdrills and exercises conducted during 2005 and 2006 to verify that these activities wereadequately critiqued. Samples of corrective action program records and associatedcorrective actions were reviewed to determine if weaknesses and deficiencies identifiedin the following types of self-assessments were adequately addressed:  critiques of EPdrills and exercises; NOS 2005 and 2006 station EP audits; and Fermi Plant EP staff2006 and 2007 self-assessments.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.1EP6 Drill Evaluation (71114.06)
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors observed the licensee perform an EP drill on March 21, 2007. Theinspectors observed activities in the control room simulator, technical support center,and emergency operations facility. The inspectors also attended the post-drill facilitycritiques in the technical support center and emergency operations facility immediatelyfollowing the drill. The focus of the inspectors' activities was to note any weaknessesand deficiencies in the drill performance and ensure the licensee evaluators noted thesame weaknesses and deficiencies and entered them into the corrective actionprogram. The inspectors placed emphasis on observations regarding eventclassification, notifications, protective action recommendations, and site evacuationand accountability activities. As part of the inspection, the inspectors reviewed thedrill package included in the list of documents reviewed at the end of this report.These activities completed one drill evaluation inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.2.
 
==RADIATION SAFETY==
 
===Cornerstone:===
Occupational Radiation Safety2OS3 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective Equipment (71121.03).1
 
=====Inspection Planning=====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the Fermi Power Plant Unit 2 UFSAR to identify applicableradiation monitors associated with measuring transient high and very high radiationareas including those used in remote emergency assessment. The inspectors identifiedthe types of portable radiation detection instrumentation used for job coverage of highradiation area work including instruments used for underwater surveys, fixed arearadiation monitors used to provide radiological information in various plant areas, andcontinuous air monitors used to assess airborne radiological conditions and work areaswith the potential for workers to receive a 50 millirem or greater committed effectivedose equivalent. Contamination monitors, whole body counters and those radiationdetection instruments utilized for the release of personnel, and equipment from theradiologically restricted area were also identified.These activities completed two inspection samples.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..2 Walkdowns of Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors conducted walkdowns of selected area radiation monitors (ARMs)in the main control room, turbine, radioactive waste, and reactor buildings to verify theywere located as described in the UFSAR and were optimally positioned relative to thepotential source(s) of radiation they were intended to monitor and to verify that controlroom instrument readout and high alarm setpoints for those ARMs were consistent withUFSAR information and actual field conditions. Walkdowns were also conducted ofthose areas where portable survey instruments were calibrated/repaired and maintainedfor radiation protection staff use to determine if those instruments designated "ready foruse" were sufficient in number to support the radiation protection program, had currentcalibration stickers, were operable, and were in good physical condition. Additionally,the inspectors observed the licensee's instrument calibration units and the radiationsources used for instrument checks to assess their material condition and discussed their use with RP staff to determine if they were used adequately. Licensee personnelwere also observed performing source checks of selected instruments as they werelogged-out for use. These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.
 
===.3 Calibration and Testing of Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation===
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors selectively reviewed radiological instrumentation associated withmonitoring transient high and/or very high radiation areas, instruments used forremote emergency assessment and radiation monitors used to identify personnelcontamination and for assessment of internal exposures to verify that the instrumentshad been calibrated as required by the licensee's procedures, consistent with industryand regulatory standards. The inspectors also reviewed alarm setpoints for selectedARMs to verify that they were established consistent with the UFSAR and TSs, asapplicable. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed calibration procedures and the mostrecent calibration records and/or source characterization/output verification documentsfor the following radiation monitoring instrumentation and instrument calibrationequipment:*
Containment High Range ARMs (both divisions);*
Main Control Room (Channel 6);*
Traversing In-Core Probe Room ARM (Channel 12);*
Refuel Floor ARMs (Channels 15 and 17);*
New Fuel Storage Vault (Channel 16);*
Small Articles Monitors used at plant egress points;*
J. L. Shepherd Instrument Calibrator;*
Portable survey instruments used for underwater surveys;*
Standup Whole Body Counter;
* Portal Monitors used at the Primary Access Portal; and*
Personnel Contamination Monitors used at the egress points.The inspectors determined what actions were taken when, and during calibration orsource checks, an instrument was found significantly out of calibration or exceededas-found acceptance criteria. Should that occur, the inspectors verified that thelicensee's actions would include a determination of the instrument's previous usagesand the possible consequences of that use, since the prior calibration. The inspectorsalso reviewed the licensee's 10 CFR Part 61 source term information to determine if thecalibration sources used were representative of the plant source term and that difficult todetect nuclides were scaled into whole body count dose determinations. These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====


=====Introduction:=====
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Emergenc y P repa redn ess a.
The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and anassociated Non-Cited Violation of NRC requirements for the failure to maintain adequateprocedures for the calibration of the containment high range ARMs (D11-K816 A and B).  


=====Description:=====
Insp ecti on Sco peT he inspect ors revi ew ed sam ples of li cense e recor ds assoc iated w ith the t hree EP perf orm ance indicato rs listed belo Ins pect ors v erif ied that the licensee accur ately r e p o r t e d t h e s e i n d i c a t o r s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h r e l e v a n t p r o c e d u r e s a n d N u c l e a r E n e r gy Insti tute guid anc e e ndo rsed by the N R S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see r e c o r d s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h P I d a t a r e p o r t e d t o t h e N R C fo r t h e p e r i o d A p r i l 2 0 0 6 t h r o u gh De cembe r 20 0 R ev ie w ed reco rds in cl ude d: proc edu ral gui dan ce on ass ess in g opp ortun iti es f or th ese thre e P Is; p re-de si gnated Co ntrol R oom Si mul ator trai ni ng ses si ons , the 20 06 bi enn ia l ex erci se, and i ntegrated eme rgency res pon se f aci li ty dri ll s;revisions of the ros ter of person nel assig ned to k ey ERO posit ions; and re sults of periodic AN S ope rabi li ty tes t The foll ow in g PIs w ere rev ie w ed:*
The containment high range ARMs are used to facilitate the evaluation ofcore damage in the event of a postulated accident and are also used as ARMs duringplant operations, shutdown, and under accident conditions. The design, use, andmaintenance of these monitors is described in the station UFSAR and the radiologicalemergency response preparedness plan. The inspectors identified that in 2001 the licensee revised plant technical proceduresfor the calibration of the containment high range ARMs. That revision eliminated therequirement that the calibration of the containment high range ARMs be performed witha traceable, known source of radioactivity. Since that time, the 18-month calibration wasreduced to an electronic calibration of the instrument with only a qualitative verification ofdetector response. The inspectors concluded that the change to the licensee's procedure resulted in anincomplete calibration of the instrument which failed to provide assurance that theinstrument would accurately respond. As further described in NUREG 0737, thecalibration of the containment high range ARMs are to include a single point in-situcalibration that exposes the detectors to a known source of radiation in the range of1 Rem/hr to 10 Rem/hr. Prior to 1999, the licensee's TSs contained a requirement to perform a single point in-situcalibration and expose the containment high range radiation detectors to a known sourceof radiation in the range of 1 Rem/hr to 10 Rem/hr. However, the detail of this calibrationrequirement was deleted when the licensee transitioned to Improved TechnicalSpecifications in accordance with license amendment 134, dated September 30, 1999. Although, the licensee indicated to the inspectors that no change in detector calibrationprotocol was intended with the implementation of Improved Technical Specifications,station procedures 62.120.040 and 62.120.041 for the calibration of the containment highrange ARMs were changed in 2001. That change eliminated the requirement for aquantitative radiation check as a part of the instrument calibration.
 
=====Analysis:=====
The failure to adequately maintain procedures for the calibration of thecontainment high range ARMs was determined to be a performance deficiency as definedin NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0612, "Power Reactor Inspection Reports,"Appendix B, "Issue Screening."  Specifically, the inspectors determined that not calibratingthe containment high range ARMs using radiation sources of known values was morethan minor because it was associated with the Occupational Radiation Safety cornerstoneattribute of Plant Facilities/Equipment and Instrumentation and affected the cornerstoneobjective of ensuring adequate protection of worker health and safety from exposure toradiation from radioactive materials during civilian nuclear reactor operation. Therefore,the issue was greater than minor and represented a finding which was evaluated usingthe Significance Determination Process (SDP).
 
Since the finding involved ARMs, the inspectors utilized IMC 0609, Appendix C,"Occupational Radiation Safety SDP," to assess its significance. The inspectorsconcluded that the issue did not involve as-low-as-is-reasonably-achievableplanning or work controls, there was no overexposure or substantial potential foran overexposure to the worker, and the licensee's ability to assess dose was notcompromised. Consequently, the inspectors concluded that the SDP assessmentfor the finding was of very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors also reviewed the issue and determined that no cross-cutting aspectswere identified in the areas of human performance, problem identification and resolution,or safety conscious work environment.
 
=====Enforcement:=====
Technical Specification 5.4.1 requires that written procedures beestablished, implemented, and maintained for activities listed in RegulatoryGuide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A, February 1978. Regulatory Guide 1.33 definesthe quality assurance program requirements for nuclear power plants and Appendix A,Section 7, step f. specifies procedures for the ARMs. Contrary to the above, the licenseedid not maintain adequate calibration procedures for the containment high range ARMs. Since 2001, Fermi Station procedures for the calibration of the containment high rangeARMs did not include a quantitative response to a known source of radiation as a part ofthe instrument calibration which resulted in an incomplete calibration of the instrument. As an immediate correction action, the licensee performed an evaluation and determinedthat the monitor was functional based on its adequate response to ambient radiationlevels. The licensee also planned to revise applicable procedures to perform thecalibrations using appropriate radioactive sources. Since the licensee documented thisissue in its corrective action program (CARD 07-21616), and because this finding is ofvery low safety significance, it is being treated as a Non-Cited Violation(NCV 05000341/2007002-01)..4 Problem Identification and Resolution
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed licensee condition assessment resolution documents (CARDs)and any special reports that involved personnel contamination monitor alarms due topersonnel internal exposures to verify that identified problems were entered into thecorrective action program for resolution. Licensee audits and CARDs were also reviewedto verify that deficiencies and problems with radiological instrumentation, the radiationmonitoring system or self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) were identified,characterized, prioritized, and resolved effectively using the corrective action program.The inspectors reviewed corrective action program reports related to exposure significantradiological incidents that involved radiation monitoring instrument deficiencies since thelast inspection in this area, as applicable. Members of the radiation protection staff wereinterviewed and corrective action documents were reviewed to verify that follow-upactivities were being conducted in an effective and timely manner commensurate withtheir importance to safety and risk based on the following:
* Initial problem identification, characterization, and tracking;*
Disposition of operability/reportability issues;*
Evaluation of safety significance/risk and priority for resolution;*
Identification of repetitive problems;*
Identification of contributing causes; and*
Identification and implementation of effective corrective actions.The inspectors determined if the licensee's self-assessment and/or audit activities wereidentifying and addressing repetitive deficiencies or significant individual deficiencies inproblem identification and resolution. These reviews represented three inspection samples.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..5 Radiation Protection Technician Instrument Use
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors selectively verified that calibrations for those instruments recently usedand for those designated for use had not lapsed. The inspectors reviewed instrumentlogs to verify that response checks of portable survey instruments were completed priorto instrument use and upon return of the instrument to the storage area after use, asrequired by the licensee's procedure. The inspectors also discussed instrumentcalibration methods and source response check practices with radiation protectionstaff and observed staff complete instrument operability checks prior to use. These reviews represented one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..6 Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) Maintenance/Inspection and User Training
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed aspects of the licensee's respiratory protection program forcompliance with the requirements of Subpart H of 10 CFR Part 20 and to determine ifSCBA was properly maintained and ready for emergency use. The inspectorsreviewed the status, maintenance, and surveillance records of SCBAs staged andready-for-emergency use in various areas of the plant and assessed the licensee'scapability for refilling and transporting SCBA air bottles to and from the control roomand operations support center (OSC) during emergency conditions. The inspectorsverified that selected control room staff designated for the active on-shift duty roster,including those individuals on the station's fire brigade, were trained, respirator fit tested,and medically certified to use SCBAs. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed SCBA qualifications for the emergency response organization's radiological emergency teamto determine if a sufficient number of staff were qualified to fulfill emergency responsepositions to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47. The inspectors also reviewedrespiratory protection training lesson plans to assess their overall adequacy forcompliance with Subpart H, and to verify that personal SCBA air bottle change-outwas adequately covered.The inspectors walked down the bottled air supply rack and spare air bottle stationslocated outside the main control room and inspected SCBA equipment maintained inthe control room and SCBA equipment staged for emergency use in various areas of theplant. During the walkdowns, the inspectors examined several SCBA units to assess theirmaterial condition, to verify that air bottle hydrostatic tests were current, and to verify thatbottles were pressurized to meet procedural requirements. The inspectors reviewedrecords of SCBA equipment inspection and functional testing and observed selectedoperations personnel inspect, don, doff, and use SCBA air packs to determine if theseactivities were performed consistent with procedure and the equipment manufacturersrecommendations. The inspectors also ensured that the required, periodic air cylinderhydrostatic testing was documented and up to date, and that the Department ofTransportation required retest air cylinder markings were in place for several randomlyselected SCBA units. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed vendor training certificates forthose individuals involved in the repair of SCBA pressure regulators to determine if thosepersonnel that performed maintenance on components vital to equipment function werequalified. The most recent vital component (regulator) test records were reviewed by theinspectors for selected SCBA equipment currently designated for emergency use.These reviews represented two inspection samples.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.4.
 
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
Cornerstones:  Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity, andEmergency Preparedness
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71151}}
.1 Reactor Safety Strategic Area
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled the licensee's submittals for the performance indicators (PIs)listed below. The inspectors used PI definitions and guidance contained in Revision 4 ofNuclear Energy Institute Document 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance IndicatorGuideline," to verify the accuracy of the PI data. The following PIs were reviewed:
* Unplanned Scrams;*
Scrams with Loss of Normal Heat Removal;*
Unplanned Power Changes; and
* RCS Leakage.The inspectors reviewed selected applicable conditions and data from logs, licensee eventreports, and CARDs from January 2005 through January 2007, for each PI area specifiedabove. The inspectors independently re-performed calculations where applicable. Theinspectors compared that information to the information required for each PI definition inthe guideline to ensure the licensee reported the data correctly.These activities completed four performance indicator inspection samples.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..2 Emergency Preparedness
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed samples of licensee records associated with the three EPperformance indicators listed below. Inspectors verified that the licensee accuratelyreported these indicators in accordance with relevant procedures and Nuclear EnergyInstitute guidance endorsed by the NRC. Specifically, the inspectors reviewed licenseerecords associated with PI data reported to the NRC for the period April 2006 throughDecember 2006. Reviewed records included: procedural guidance on assessingopportunities for these three PIs; pre-designated Control Room Simulator trainingsessions, the 2006 biennial exercise, and integrated emergency response facility drills;revisions of the roster of personnel assigned to key ERO positions; and results of periodicANS operability tests. The following PIs were reviewed:*
ANS;*
ANS;*
ERO Drill Participation; and*
ER O Dri ll P arti ci pati on; and*
Drill and Exercise Performance.These activities completed three inspection samples.
Dri ll an d E x erci se Pe rf ormanc e.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e i nsp ecti on sampl e b.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}
.1 Routine Review of Identification and Resolution of Problems
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
As discussed in previous sections of this report, the inspectors routinely reviewed issuesduring baseline inspection activities and plant status reviews to verify they were beingentered into the licensee's corrective action system at an appropriate threshold, adequateattention was being given to timely corrective actions, and adverse trends were identifiedand addressed.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..2 Annual Sample:  Review of Issues Relating to Human Performance
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed issues relating to low level human performance duringDecember 2006 and the first quarter of 2007. The inspectors reviewed CARDs 06-27827,06-27974, 06-27681, 07-20378, 07-20490, 07-20510, 07-20519, and 07-20785.
 
b.
 
ObservationsBased on a review of the licensee CARDs, the inspectors noted an increase in thenumber of low level human performance issues that occurred during the last month of2006 and the first quarter of 2007. An investigation of the CARDs associated with theseissues revealed a variety of human performance incidents involving non safety-relatedequipment, including valve and switch mis-positions, maintenance performed on thewrong equipment, and significant rework on the south RWCU pump due to poor workerpractices during the pump rebuild. As part of the licensee's corrective actions, thelicensee integrated more human performance trending into the corrective action process. The licensee recognized that the disposition of the human performance trend evaluationshad not been fully effective. The licensee used the February 2007 leadership briefing toincrease plant worker awareness of the issue and completed a common cause analysison the issue of human performance on March 28, 2007. The licensee plans to implementthe corrective actions from the common cause during the second quarter of 2007.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====c. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified.
{{a|4OA3}}
==4OA3 Event Followup==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71153}}
.1 RWCU 'B' Pump Seal Failure
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
On February 6, 2007, RWCU 'B' seal failure led to an isolation of the RWCU system. The inspectors observed the operators follow the abnormal operating procedures anddepressurize the RWCU system to stop the leak. Operations verified that the leak wasisolated and that the 'A' train of RWCU was intact. Following the verifications of systemintegrity, the inspectors observed the operators restore the RWCU system to operationusing the 'A' train.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified..2 Inadequate Verification of Alternate Emergency Operations Facility Readiness
 
====a. Inspection Scope====
During the week of February 19, 2007, the licensee removed the normal emergencyoperations facility (EOF) from service for remodeling. On February 21, 2007, theinspectors drove to the alternate EOF (AEOF) to tour the facility for readiness.These activities completed one inspection sample.
 
====b. Findings====
 
=====Introduction:=====
The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance (Green)for the failure to verify adequate compensatory actions were in place while the EOF wasunavailable. The AEOF was modified such that activation of the facility would have beensignificantly delayed.Description:  The licensee started remodeling the EOF which rendered the EOFunavailable for five days beginning February 19, 2007. As a compensatory action, thelicensee planned to use their AEOF for emergency response if required. The AEOF is amedium-sized multipurpose conference room. Inside the AEOF is a locked storage roomwith the required materials such as procedures, maps, dose assessment computer, etc.On February 21, 2007, two days after the remodeling began, the inspectors informed thelicensee of their desire to tour the AEOF to verify the readiness of the facility which islocated in a Detroit Edison building approximately 25 miles from Fermi. A member of theFermi ERO met the inspectors at the facility. Upon arrival, the inspectors and licenseerepresentative discovered that locks had been installed on the doors to the conferenceroom without the licensee's knowledge. The locks were installed several days previouslyto help secure computers in the room that were being used to test an upgrade to the company's network. Only two keys were available, both of which were maintained by twoadministrative assistants who work during the day and are not on any relevant paging orcall-out list.The AEOF activation procedure stated that a key to the storage room is kept with theRegional System Supervisor, a position in the building staffed continually in the RegionalOperations Center (ROC); however, Detroit Edison consolidated several months ago andmoved this position to a location 25 miles away. Even after the consolidation, the ROCremained continuously locked behind key-carded doors. After 45 minutes, the inspectorsand the licensee were able to locate one of the few individuals who could open the doorand gain access to the ROC. A key to the storage room was also staged in the EOF, but licensee staff would have gone directly to the AEOF if responding from home duringoff hours. Further, radios the licensee would have relied on for offsite dose assessmentteams were also located in the ROC.Had the licensee needed to staff the AEOF during off-normal hours, these unforseencircumstances could have delayed the activation of the facility which could haveadversely affected the ability of the licensee to protect the public in the event of anemergency. Consequently, the facility custodian disabled the locks, the licenseeestablished a continuous watch at the AEOF, and corporate security authorized allEOF members access to the ROC.The licensee did not physically verify the readiness of the AEOF prior to removing theEOF from service but rather verified that the last surveillance was satisfactorily completed. The licensee further concluded that the only controls in place to ensure the readiness ofthe room was via an informal verbal agreement with supervisory personnel in the building. As such, a formal "letter of agreement" between Fermi and Detroit Edison's Facilities andAsset Management was signed to ensure proper controls remained in place.Analysis:  The inspectors determined the failure to verify adequate compensatorymeasures were in place prior to removing the EOF from service was a performancedeficiency warranting a significance determination. The inspectors determined theissue was more than minor because it was similar to an example question in IMC 0612,Appendix E, in that the AEOF and the procedures for activating the AEOF were in acondition that would have affected the licensee's response to an emergency. UsingIMC 0609, Appendix B, "Emergency Preparedness Significance Determination Process"dated March 6, 2003, the inspectors determined this issue was of very low safetysignificance (Green) because the duration for which adequate compensatory measureswere not in place while the EOF was not functional was less than seven days. (FIN 05000341/2007002-02).Enforcement:  The inspectors reviewed the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and10 CFR 50.47 and determined this finding did not involve a violation of NRC requirementssince neither the AEOF nor the EOF are safety-related and the issue did not involve eithera degradation or the augmentation of the facility but rather the timeliness of activating thefacility. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's Emergency Plan and determined that it didnot require facility activation within any prescribed time limit. Therefore, all emergencyplanning standards were satisfied. This issue has been entered into the licensee's corrective action program as CARD 07-21035. Once the issue was identified, thelicensee ensured the locks were disabled and continuously staffed the AEOF with an EOFmember until positive controls were in place to ensure continued availability of the AEOF.4OA5 Other Activities.1 (Closed) URI (05000341/2005016-01):  Review of Fermi 2 licensing basis with regard tothe mitigation of tornado effects.During the previous inspection, the licensee was not able to provide an analysis or otherdocumentation to demonstrate that the RHR complex and its enclosed components werecapable of withstanding the depressurization effects that could occur if a tornado passeddirectly over the building. The inspectors postulated that if a tornado depressurizationzone passed by the RHR complex, the outside air pressure would be higher than thereduced pressure inside the diesel generator rooms, thereby closing the gravity exhaustdampers. The inspectors postulated that this phenomenon could result in a maximumpressure differential of 3 psid between the normal outside atmospheric pressure and thereduced inside atmospheric pressure. This differential pressure could develop acrossboth the ventilation system intake and exhaust dampers as well as across the buildingstructural components such as the roof. The inspectors were concerned that the EDGsupport systems or the structure that enclosed the EDGs could, therefore, be damaged. This issue was considered an unresolved item (URI 05000341/2005016-01) pendingfurther review of Fermi 2's licensing basis by the NRC.The inspectors performed an initial review of NUREG-0798, "Safety Evaluation ReportRelated to the Operation of Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Docket No. 50-341,"dated July 1981. Section 3.2.2, "Tornado Design Criteria," described NRR's review ofthe Fermi 2 tornado design criteria. The document concluded that the design basistornado and the procedures used for calculating loadings on structures met theapplicable requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.76 and was acceptable. The documentfurther stated that "the use of these procedures provides assurance that, in the event ofa design basis tornado, the structural integrity of the plant structures that need to bedesigned for tornados will not be impaired and, in consequence, safety-related systemsand components located within these structures will be adequately protected and may beexpected to perform their necessary safety functions as required."  The inspectors couldnot determine if this safety evaluation report considered the issue described above since itdid not appear to address re-pressurization effects. The inspectors also noted thatRegulatory Guide 1.76 described the design basis tornado, but it did not discuss thestructural design requirements for tornado protection.The issue was discussed with NRR personnel and it was determined that licensees werenot specifically required to analyze the structural integrity of the HVAC systems, or otherinternal systems, in Category I structures to withstand tornado depressurization effects. However, in NRC Regulatory Issue Summary (RIS) 2006-23, "Post-Tornado Operabilityof Ventilating and Air-Conditioning Systems Housed in Emergency Diesel GeneratorRooms" dated December 6, 2006, the NRC staff concluded that licensees may not haveadequately considered tornado wind and pressure-drop effects on safety-related systemsand components inside building structures open to the outside environment. The RISfurther documented that licensees should take any necessary measures to ensure theoperability of ventilation and air conditioning duct systems located in EDG rooms.
 
The inspectors conducted a walkdown of Fermi 2 RHR/EDG complex, reviewed variousplant documents, engaged in discussions with several plant personnel and made thefollowing qualitative assessment:*
During a tornado (depressurization outside), the roof mounted EDG/RHR andswitchgear room HVAC exhaust dampers (all of which are missile protected) willopen to equalize the pressure, so no differential pressure (dp) will exist betweenthe inside and outside of the EDG/RHR building.*
After a tornado passes the building (re-pressurization outside), the EDG/RHR andswitchgear room HVAC intake dampers will each allow in-leakage of approximately300 cubic feet per minute of air through existing openings (under fully closedposition), thereby reducing the postulated 3 psi dp between inside and outside thebuildings considerably and equalizing the pressure relatively quickly.*
All the essential switchgear, EDG control panels, and MCC are sufficiently vented,which eliminated the differential pressure concerns expressed in the URI.*
The roof slab had sufficient design margin to withstand the effects of a tornado.*
The two offsite power sources/switchyard available at Fermi 2 are geographicallyseparated (one located at the south side and the other at the west side of theplant), which considerably reduces the probability of a tornado causing completeloss of offsite power at Fermi 2.*
The EDG combustion air intake and exhaust are unaffected by thedepressurization and re-pressurization effects of a tornado based on theirlocation and the fact that they are well shielded from tornado borne missiles.*
The only component that may malfunction/damage during re-pressurization after atornado is the EDG/RHR room ventilation exhaust gravity damper mounted on theroof. Damage to this damper does not affect the immediate operability of theEDGs, RHR service water and EDG service water pumps. This will only affect theroom heat up rate. Operator actions in response to the EDG room temperaturealarms (in the control room) are expected to restore EDG/RHR room HVACsystems in a timely manner.The inspectors also reviewed the applicability review of this RIS conducted by the licenseeand documented in an attachment to CARD 05-26492. The inspectors concluded that theapplicability review performed by the licensee was adequate as it was based on thesimilar qualitative assessment/arguments as described above. Therefore, the inspectorsdetermined no performance deficiencies or violations of regulatory requirements occurredand no additional enforcement action was warranted. The inspectors had no furtherconcerns in this area. This unresolved item is closed..2 (Closed) URI (05000341/2005016-02):  Review of Fermi 2 licensing basis with regardto the potential release path via the condensate storage tank (CST) following the lossof coolant accident (LOCA)
During the 2005 Safety System Design and Performance Capability inspection, theinspectors identified an unresolved item concerning a potential radioactive releasepath via the CST following a LOCA. While in standby, the RCIC system is normallyaligned to the CST through a check valve E5150F011 (F011) and normally open motoroperated valve (MOV) E5150F010 (F010). When the level in the CST decreases to apredetermined setpoint or when the level in the suppression pool increases to apredetermined setpoint, the suction path switches to the suppression pool as the normallyclosed MOVs E5150F029 (F029) and E5150F031 (F031) open and MOV F010 closes.The HPCI system functions in a similar manner with CST suction check valve E4150F019(F019) and normally open MOV E4150F004 (F004) and the suppression pool suctionvalves, normally closed MOVs E4150F041 (F041) and E4150F042 (F042). The inspectors were concerned that the licensee did not leak test the CST suction or thesuppression pool suction valves. The inspectors postulated that following a design basisLOCA and a range of intermediate break LOCAs, the pressure differential between thesuppression pool and CST could cause potentially contaminated, radioactive water tobe transferred from the suppression pool to the CST through the MOVs and checkvalves. As the CST is vented, this could result in a radioactive release outside of thecurrent 10 CFR 100 and General Design Criteria 19 requirements.The licensee documented this issue as CARD 05-26699. The licensee believed that thesecondary containment bypass leakage postulated in the above scenario was not part ofplant design and licensing basis. The licensee based this position in part on the responseto the Three Mile Island (TMI) Question H.III.1.1.1, which stated that the CST wasidentified as isolated from highly contaminated systems. The licensee also stated that theplant design and licensing basis assumed emergency core cooling system liquid leakageoccurred within the secondary containment boundary and was limited to a rate of5 gallons per minute. Furthermore, UFSAR Section 6.2.1.2.2.3 identified that the HPCIand RCIC CST suction lines were excluded as bypass leakage paths on the basis thatthey were sealed with water. The inspectors concluded that the CST would be isolatedfrom contaminated sources if the valves in question were shown to be leak-tight. Becausethis has not been demonstrated, the inspectors believed the licensee may not be meetingtheir licensing and design basis. NRC Review and Conclusion:During this followup inspection, the inspectors reviewed several licensee documentsincluding UFSAR sections and tables; inservice testing requirements and documents;and HPCI and RCIC Design Basis Documents. The inspectors also consulted NRRpersonnel and reviewed two related task interface agreement responses at Susquehanna(TAC# M86276) and H.B Robinson (TIA 94-22) plants. The inspectors determined thatwith respect to licensing or post-TMI license conditions, valves which isolate potentialpathways were not considered containment isolation valves subject to local leak ratetesting. Also, the source terms in the licensing basis for plants do not assume waterleakage as a contributor to off-site doses. Therefore, the inspectors determined thatthe licensee was not required to leak test the valves in question.The inspectors reviewed the licensee's actions in response to CARDs 05-26699 and05-26676. The licensee implemented the following actions:
* Revised maintenance practices by requiring periodic disassembly and inspectionof the HPCI check valve (F019) in the CST suction line. The first disassembly andinspection was satisfactorily completed during a recent refueling outage.
* Revised the inservice testing program to include stroke testing of the RCIC CSTsuction line valve F010. In addition, the licensee planned to perform a reverseleak test on the RCIC check valve F011 which was already subjected to routinepreventive maintenance disassembly and inservice inspection.
* Revised the inservice testing program to include periodic stroke testing RCICMOVs F029 and F010. The initial baseline stroke-time testing was completed inFebruary 2006. The inspectors generally agreed with the licensee's disposition that under all scenarios,after considering single failures, at least one safety-related valve would be functional asa barrier. In some scenarios, peak accident conditions would result in sufficient toruspressure to lift emergency core cooling system water to the CST via the suction lines. The emergency operating procedures would direct the operators to initiate the torussprays early in the event, thus the period of time during which torus pressure would besufficient to push water toward the CST is expected to be very short, about one day. Because of the large volume of piping between the CST and the CST swap isolationvalves and typical valve leak rates, the inspectors determined that it would take manydays to fill the HPCI and RCIC CST suction lines. The inspectors determined no performance deficiencies or violations of regulatoryrequirements were identified and no additional enforcement action was warranted. The inspectors had no further concerns in this area. This unresolved item is closed.4OA6 Exit Meetings.1 Exit Meeting SummaryOn April 5, 2007, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. J. Davis and othermembers of licensee management at the conclusion of the inspection. The inspectorsasked the licensee whether any material examined during the inspection should beconsidered proprietary. No proprietary information was identified..2 Interim Exit MeetingsThe following interim exit meetings were conducted for:
* Emergency Preparedness inspection with Mr. D. Gipson on March 9, 2007;*
Occupational radiation safety program for radiation monitoring instrumentation andprotective equipment with Messrs. D. Cobb and K. Hlavaty on March 23, 2007.4OA7 Licensee-Identified ViolationsNo findings of significance were identified.ATTACHMENT: 
 
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
 
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
Licensee
: [[contact::J. Davis]], Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer
: [[contact::D. Gibson]], Executive Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer
: [[contact::D. Cobb]], Assistant Vice President Nuclear Generation
: [[contact::K. Hlavaty]], Plant Manager
: [[contact::B. Bertossi]], Radiation Protection
: [[contact::K. Burke]], Supervisor, Performance Engineering
: [[contact::R. Gaston]], Manager, Nuclear Licensing
: [[contact::D. Harman]], Radiation Protection
: [[contact::A. Hassoun]], Principal Licensing Engineer
: [[contact::D. Kusumawati]], Engineer, Nuclear Licensing
: [[contact::R. Libra]], Director Nuclear Engineering
: [[contact::K. Morris]], Emergency Preparedness Supervisor
: [[contact::D. Noetzel]], Manager Nuclear System Engineering
: [[contact::B. O'Donnell]], Manager, Performance Engineering
: [[contact::M. Philippon]], Operations Manager
: [[contact::G. Piccard]], Manager, Radiation Protection
: [[contact::J. Plona]], Director, Nuclear Engineering
: [[contact::J. Priest]], Radiation Protection Supervisor
: [[contact::T. VanderMay]], Radiation ProtectionNRC
: [[contact::C. Lipa]], Chief, Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 4
: [[contact::S. Orth]], Leader, Division of Reactor Safety, Plant Support Team
: [[contact::K. Riemer]], Chief, Division of Reactor Safety, Plant Support Branch
: [[contact::A. Stone]], Division of Reactor Safety, Branch 2
Attachment
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
Opened and
===Closed===
: [[Closes finding::05000341/FIN-2007002-01]]
: NCV
: Failure to Perform a Complete Calibration of theContainment High Range Area Radiation Monitor
: [[Closes finding::05000341/FIN-2007002-02]]
: FIN
: Inadequate Verification of Alternate EmergencyOperations Facility ReadinessClosed
: [[Closes finding::05000341/FIN-2005016-01]]
: URI
: Review of Fermi 2 licensing basis with regard to themitigation of tornado effects.
: [[Closes finding::05000341/FIN-2005016-02]]
: URI
: Review of Fermi 2 licensing basis with regard to thepotential release path via the condensate storage tankfollowing the loss of coolant accident.DiscussedNone.
: Attachment
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection.
: Inclusion on this list does notimply that the NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety but rather that selectedsections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC acceptance of the document or any partof it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
 
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection2007 Cold Weather PreparationsSection 1R04:==
: Equipment AlignmentCARD 06-22125; Broken Electrical Flex Conduit; dated 04/10/2006CARD 06-22590; NRC Identified Concern With Div. I Core Spray and Defense In Depth;dated 04/21/2006CARD 06-22911; Packing Leak On E2100-F007A; dated 04/28/2006CARD 06-22912; Packing Leak On E2100-F006B; dated 04/28/2006CARD 06-23366; Core Spray Pump Motors Oil Cooler Sealing Baffle Additions; dated05/15/2006 CARD 07-21458; Failed PMT due to excessive deadband in RCIC turbine oil filter switch;dated 03/13/2007Drawing 6M721-2034; Diagram Core Spray System Reactor Building; dated 10/21/05Drawing 6M721-5707; Core Spray System Functional Operating Sketch; dated 10/21/05Drawing 6M721-5709-1; Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System Functional Operating Sketch; dated 05/18/2006Drawing 6M721-5706-1; Residual Heat Removal Division II System Functional Operating Sketch;dated 03/05/2004Drawing 6M721-5706-3; Residual Heat Removal Service Water Make Up Decant and OverflowSystems Functional Operating Sketch; dated 06/30/2006Job
: ID 0175061006; Perform 24.203.03 Sec-5.1 CSS Pump And Valve Operability Test;dated 10/06/2006Procedure 23.203; Core Spray System; Revision 40 Procedure 24.203.03; Division 2 CSS Pump and Valve Operability, and Automatic Actuation;Revision 45Procedure 23.206; Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System; Revision 86Procedure 23.205; Residual Heat Removal System; Revision 98Procedure 23.208; RHR Complex Service Water Systems; Revision 85ST-ES-339-0028-001; Core Spray System E2100; Revision 2Section 1R05Q:
: Fire ProtectionUFSAR Figure 9A-4; Fire Protection Evaluation Reactor and Auxiliary Buildings First Floor Plan;Revision 14, dated 11/06
 
==Section 1R06: Flood Protection MeasuresARP 2D105; Reactor Building Corner Rooms/==
: HPCI Room Flood Level; Revision 13ARP 2D78; Reactor Building Floor/Equipment Drain Sumps Level Hi-Hi/Lo-Lo; Revision 14 Drawing 6M721-2032; Sump Pump Diagram Radwaste System; Revision AYDrawing 6M721-5710-2; Sump Pumps System Functional Operating Sketch; Revision AA
: AttachmentProcedure 47.000.84; Local Leakage Rate Testing For Equipment and Floor Drain CheckValves - G1101-F1407; dated April 22, 2006Surveillance Scheduling and Tracking; Perform 47.000.84 Sec 6.4 LLRT for Floor DrainCheck Valves - G1101F1407 and 1408; dated April 14, 2006Surveillance Scheduling and Tracking; Perform 47.000.04 Sec 6.4 LLRT for Equipment DrainCheck Valves G1101F1410 & 1411; dated April 25, 2006Performance Evaluation Procedure 27.702.01; Reactor Building Sump Cross-tie Flood ControlValve Test; Revision 6UFSAR 9.3.3; Plant Equipment and Floor DrainsUFSAR 2.4; Hydrologic EngineeringUFSAR 3.4; Water Level (Flood) Design
 
==Section 1R07: Heat Sink PerformanceST-OP-315-0065-001; Emergency Diesel Generator R3000; Revision 17WR
: 836060100; Perform 18-Month Visual==
: PM On
: EDG 11 JCS, LO, ACS Heat Exchangers;dated 10/24/05WR
: 840060100; Perform 18-Month Visual PM On
: EDG 12 JCS, LO, ACS Heat Exchangers;dated 01/30/06WR
: 848060100; Perform 18-Month Visual PM On
: EDG 13 JCS, LO, ACS Heat Exchangers;dated 10/03/06WR
: 844060100; Perform 18-Month Visual PM On
: EDG 14 JCS, LO, ACS Heat Exchangers;dated 11/17/06


==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator RequalificationEvaluation Scenario==
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie En cl osu re 4OA2 Iden tifica tio n a nd Re sol uti on of Prob le ms (71 152).1 R o u ti n e R e v i e w o f Id e n ti fic a ti o n a n d R e so l u ti o n o f P ro b l e ms a.
: SS-OP-904-1012; Drywell Pressure Inst. Fails/RR Pump Fails/SmallLOCA/Partial Failure of ECCSProcedure 27.000.04; Freeze Protection Lineup Verification; Revision 32 Procedure 27.000.06; Hot Weather Operations; Revision 0Procedure 27.000.07; Cold Weather Operations; Revision 0WR
: WST 940552; dated 02/13/07


==Section 1R12: Maintenance EffectivenessSurveillance Performance Procedure 47.000.84; Local Leakage Rate for EquipmentSurveillance Performance Procedure 47.000.84; Sec 6.2,==
Insp ecti on Sco peAs di scu sse d i n p rev io us sec tio ns of thi s re port, the in spe ctors routi nel y rev ie w ed is sue s duri ng ba sel in e i nsp ecti on acti v iti es and pl ant statu s re v ie w s to v eri f y the y w ere bei ng e n te re d i n to t h e l i ce n se e's c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n s y st e m a t a n a p p ro p ri a te t h re sh o l d , a d e qua te atten tio n w as bei ng giv en to ti mel y co rrecti v e a cti ons , an d a dv erse tren ds w ere id enti f ie d a n d a d d re ss e b.
: LLRT for Equip DRN CKVLV's - G1101F1410 and 1411; dated 04/25/2006


==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessment and Emergent Work EvaluationCDF Risk Profile for the weeks of 1/29 to 2/5 and 2/5 to 2/12==
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 An nua l Sa mpl e: Re v ie w of Issu es Re la tin g to H uman P erformance a.
: CDF Risk Profile for the week of 3/5 to 3/12EDG 11 JC Expansion Tank Inleakage 000Z070576; dated 02/26/2007LERF Risk Profile for the weeks of 1/29 to 2/5 and 2/5 to 2/12LERF Risk Profile for the week of 3/5 to 3/12Scheduler's Evaluation for Fermi 2; dated 03/03/2007Surveillance Performance Form 10/27/2006; Perform 42.302.07 Div 1 Bus 64B 4160VWorkweek Risk for Week of 02/26/2007
: Attachment


==Section 1R15: Operability EvaluationsCARD 06-27664;==
Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed is sue s re la tin g to l ow l ev el hu man performance du rin g De cembe r 20 06 and the first qua rter o f 20 0 The in spe ctors rev ie w ed CA RD s 0 6-27 827 , 0 6-2 7 9 7 4 , 0 6-2 7 6 8 1 , 0 7-2 0 3 7 8 , 0 7-2 0 4 9 0 , 0 7-2 0 5 1 0 , 0 7-2 0 5 1 9 , a n d 0 7-2 0 7 8 b.
: AVR General Alarm; dated 12/03/2006CARD 06-27794; Missed Torque and Gasket Replacement on Thermocouple Terminal Cover;dated 12/08/2006CARD 06-27794-02; Operability of TC; dated 01/11/2007CARD 07-21421; 4D53 AVR General Alarm received on 3/11/2007; dated 03/12/2007ODMI-06-009; AVR General Alarm; Revision 2, dated 12/21/2006ODMI 07-002; DW ED Sump Temp Increase Limitations, Revision 1, dated 03/26/2007


==Section 1R19: Post-Maintenance TestingCARD 06-25497; Tech Spec Value for==
Observ ati onsBa sed on a rev ie w of the l ic ens ee CA RD s, th e i nsp ecto rs n oted an i ncre ase i n th e numb er o f l ow l ev el hu man performance i ssu es that occ urred du rin g the la st mon th o f 200 6 a nd the f irs t quarter of 200 An i nv esti gatio n o f the C AR Ds ass oci ated w ith the se is sue s re v eal ed a v ari ety of hu man performance i nci den ts i nv ol v in g non sa f ety-rel ated equi pmen t, i ncl udi ng v al v e a nd sw itc h mi s-po si tio ns, mai nten anc e p erformed o n th e w rong e quip ment, a nd si gnifica nt re w ork on the sou th R W CU pu mp d ue to p oor w orker prac tic es duri ng the pu mp re bui l A s p art o f the l ic ens ee's c orrec tiv e a cti ons , the l i ce n se e i n te gra te d mo re h u ma n p e rfor ma n ce t re n d i n g i n to t h e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro ce ss. The l ic ens ee reco gniz ed that the di spo si tio n o f the hu man performance tren d e v al uati ons h a d n o t b e e n ful l y e ff e ct i v Th e l i ce n se e u se d t h e F e b ru a ry 2 0 0 7 l e a d e rs h i p b ri e fin g to increa se plant w ork er awareness of the issue and com pleted a com mo n cause analysis on the is sue of hu man performance on M arch 28 , 20 0 The li cen see pl ans to imp le ment the corre cti v e a cti ons from the common cau se duri ng the se con d qua rter o f 20 07.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl c.
: EDG Minimum Voltage is Lower Than Tech Spec Valuefor Division I Degraded Grid Voltage; dated 08/25/2006 CARD 07-21265; RCIC Pump Outboard Seal Leak; dated 03/04/2007LCO Number 2006-0485; R3000 Division I EDGs TS Value for Minimum Voltage is Lower ThanTS Value for Division I Degraded Grid Voltage; dated 08/25/2006 Procedure 24.206.01; RCIC System Pump and Valve Operability Test; Revision 65Procedure 24.307.16; Emergency Diesel Generator 13 - Start and Load Test; Revision 46SST Event 0098; Perform 24.307.15 Sec 5.1
: EDG 12 Start and Load Test - Slow StartSST Event 0291; Perform 24.307.15 Sec 5.2
: EDG 12 Start and Load Test - Fast StartSST Event 0299; Perform 24.307.31
: EDG 12 24-Hour Run Followed by Hot Fast RestartSurveillance Performance; Procedure 24.307.14 Sec 5.1
: EDG 11 Start and Load Test - SlowStart; dated 11/29/2006Surveillance Performance; Procedure 24.307.14 Sec 5.2
: EDG 11 Start and Load Test - FastStart; dated 10/26/2006Surveillance Performance; Procedure 24.307.15, Sec 5.1
: EDG 12 Start and Load Test - SlowStart; dated 02/03/2007Surveillance Performance; Perform 24.307.15 Sec 5.2
: EDG 12 Start and Load Test - Fast Start;dated 11/02/2006Surveillance Performance; Perform 24.307.15 Sec 5.1
: EDG 12 Start and Load Test - Slow Start;dated 12/02/2006Surveillance Performance; Procedure 29.307.30,
: EDG 11 24 Hour Run Followed by Hot FastRestarts; dated 02/27/2007WR A417060100; Inspect and Test Contractor and Circuit Devices for R1600S048;dated 02/05/2007WR 000Z063138; Loose Knife Switch at its Pivot Connection; dated 02/05/2007WR 000Z061708; Replace New Fuse Block that was Damaged During Fuse Installation;dated 02/05/2007WR 000Z063204; Replace Control Transformer X4103C005,
: MCC 72EC-2C, Pos 3C;dated 02/05/2007WR 000Z063025; Replace Control Transformer X4103C006; dated 02/05/2007WR 000Z070642; RCIC Pump Outboard Seal Leak; dated 03/07/2007


==Section 1EP2: Alert and Notification System (ANS) EvaluationEP-560; Alert Notification System - Siren Operation and Maintenance; Revision 0Monroe County Emergency Management Plan; Annex B; Appendix 1; Attachment D; SpecialNotification Procedures; Revision 12ANS Siren Malfunctions and Incongruities Summary Sheets; dated May 5, 2005, throughFebruary 28, 2007==
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie En cl osu re 4OA3 Ev ent Fol lo w up (711 53).1 R W C U 'B' P u mp S e a l F a i l u re a.
: AttachmentLetter From FEMA Region V; Approval of Fermi 2 Power Plant Proposed Public Alert and Notification System Replacement; dated January 21, 2003CARD 06-26021; ANS Communication Failure from the Monroe County Dispatch Control Station;dated September 18, 2006Siren Test Results Records; dated May 25, 2005, through February 28, 2007CARD 06-24334; Alert and Notification System Siren Number 27 Failed Monthly Test;dated June 28, 2006CARD 06-22806; Alert and Notification System Siren Number 49 Displaying COMM FAILURE; dated April 26, 2006CARD 06-20370; Alert and Notification System Siren Number 49 Displaying COMM FAILURE;dated January 26, 2006CARD 05-26088; ANS Traffic Damaged Siren Number 59; dated October 31, 2005CARD 05-24258; ANS Traffic Accident Damaged Siren Number 2; dated July 18, 2005


==Section 1EP3: Emergency Response Organization Staffing and Augmentation SystemRadiological Emergency Response Plan, Table==
Insp ecti on Sco peOn F e b ru a ry 6 , 2 0 0 7 , R W C U 'B' s e a l fai l u re l e d t o a n i so l a ti o n o f th e R W C U s y st e m. The i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the ope rators foll ow the ab normal op erati ng pro ced ures an d dep ress uri z e th e R W CU sy stem to sto p th e l ea Op erati ons v eri f ie d th at th e l eak w as is ol ated an d th at th e 'A' trai n o f R W CU w as in tac F ol lo w in g the v eri f ic ati ons of sy stem in tegrity , the i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the ope rators res tore the RW CU sy stem to op erati on usi ng the 'A' trai n.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.
: B-1; Staffing For Fermi 2 Emergency ResponseOrganization; Revision 31EP-290; Emergency Notifications; Revision 45EP-292; Emergency Call Out - Backup Method; Revision 28EP-570; Emergency Call Out System - Testing and Maintenance; Revision 0QP-ER-665, Enclosure A; ERO Training Courses and Training Matrix; Revision 27Fermi 2 ERO Team List; dated March 2, 2007ECOS Test Revision Results; dated June 16, 2005, through January 19, 2007CARD 07-21001; NRC Pre-Inspection Self-Assessment - Develop ECOS Training; datedFebruary 20, 2007CARD 07-20770; NRC Pre-Inspection Self-Assessment - Backup Augmentation System TestingEvaluation; dated February 8, 2007CARD 07-20609; Operating Experience - Drive In Augmentation Drill Identifies Opportunities forImprovement (Dresden); February 1, 2007CARD 06-27763; November 29, 2006, ECOS Phone Response Only Test AugmentationWeakness; dated December 7, 2006CARD 06-26033; September 16, 2006, ECOS Phone Response Only Test Several Program andAugmentation Weaknesses; dated September 18, 2006CARD 06-21931;
: EP-220 Does Not Reflect RERP Plan RP Technician Augmentation; datedApril 5, 2006


==Section 1EP5: Correction of Emergency Preparedness WeaknessesAudit Report 06-0102; Quality Assurance Audit of the Emergency Preparedness Program; datedMarch 21, Audit Report 05-0109; Quality Assurance Audit of the Radiological Emergency ResponsePreparedness Plan; dated June 28, 2005NARP-07-0018; Focused Self-Assessment -==
F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Inad equate Ve rifica tio n o f A lte rnate E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty R ead in ess a.
: NRC Emergency Preparedness InspectionReadiness; dated March 1, 2007NARP-07-0013; Quick Hit Self-Assessment for Emergency Preparedness; datedJanuary 24, 2007NARP-06-0164; July 31, 2006 Unusual Event Declaration; dated August 10, 2006NARP-05-0058; Quick Hit Self-Assessment - Emergency Preparedness Performance IndicatorsComparison to Industry; dated May 12, 2005
: AttachmentDrill and Exercise Critique Summary; dated August 9, 2006Drill and Exercise Critique Summary; dated May 23, 2006Drill and Exercise Critique Summary; dated June 8, 2005CARD 06-23630; RERP Drill May 23, 2006 - Failed Objective Due to Incorrect Protective ActionRecommendation; dated May 26, 2006CARD 06-20860; Audit Finding - Two ERO Staff Augmentation Positions Are Not Included AsTimed Response Positions During ECOS Tests or ERO Drills and Exercises; datedFebruary 17, 2006CARD 06-20316; RERP Drill January 18, 2006 - Failure of Objective for Initial Notifications; datedJanuary 24, 2006CARD 05-25032; RERP Drill August 24, 2005, Inaccuracy On An Initial Notification Results InFailed Drill Objective; dated August 31, 2005CARD 05-23505; RERP Program Recommendations of ECOS; dated June 9, 2005CARD 05-23504; Audit Finding - Two RERP Assembly and Accountability Procedures Are NotConsistent With the RERP Plan; dated June 9, 2005CARD 05-23009; NRC Violation, Change to Emergency Preparedness Program That Decreasedthe Effectiveness Without Prior NRC Approval; May 12, 2005


==Section 1EP6: Drill EvaluationRERP Drill Package, Scenario 42; March 21, 2007Drill/Exercise Critique Summary, Scenario 42; March 21, 20072OS3 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Protective EquipmentFermi 2 Radiological Emergency Response Preparedness Plan; Revision 31Fermi 2 Technical Requirements Manual; Revision 83Fermi 2==
Insp ecti on Sco peDu rin g the w eek of Fe brua ry 19 , 20 07, the li cen see remo v ed the normal eme rgency ope rati ons facil ity (E OF) from serv ic e for re mode li n On Feb ruary 21 , 20 07, the in spe ctors drov e to the al terna te E OF (A EOF) to to ur th e faci li ty for rea di nes s.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl e. b.
: TSs; TS Bases and License Amendments 134 and 159Fermi 2 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; Chapters 11 and 12; Multiple RevisionsFermi 2 Radiation Protection Instrument Daily and Weekly Check Lists; various dates 2006and 2007Plant Technical Procedure 64.080.301; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channel FunctionalTest; Revision 31Plant Technical Procedure 64.080.302; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channel 6 Calibration;Revision 10Plant Technical Procedure 64.080.303; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channel 15Calibration; Revision 10Plant Technical Procedure 64.080.304; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channel 16Calibration; Revision 10Plant Technical Procedure 64.080.305; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channel 17Calibration; Revision 09Plant Technical Procedure 64.611.504; Area Radiation Monitoring System Channels 1-5, 7-14and 18-48 Calibration/Functional Test; Revision 14Plant Technical Procedure 65.000.228; Operation of the Radiation Protection Out-of-ServiceProgram; Revision 5Plant Technical Procedure 66.000.242; Calibration of NNC Gamma 60 Portal Monitor; Revision 3Plant Technical Procedure 66.000.247; Calibration Records of IPM9D Monitor Nos. 299 and 303;dated September 2006; and Procedure Revisions 2 and 3Plant Technical Procedure 66.000.304; Verification of Gamma Calibrator Dose Rates; Revision 6Plant Technical Procedure 66.000.245; Calibration of the NE Small Articles Monitor; Revision 3
: AttachmentSystem Health Reports; Process and Area Radiation Monitoring; dated 2005 and 2006NNC Calibration Data Forms; Instrument Nos.
: 960060 and
: 970265; dated October 5 and 6, 2006,respectivelyDositec
: AR-20 Calibration Form; Instrument No. 30245; dated September 09, 2005AMP-100 Calibration Forms; Instrument Nos. 5001-050 and 5002-077; dated April 26, 2005, andOctober 10, 2005, respectivelyAMS-4 Calibration Forms; Instrument Nos. 439, 439, 1939 and 1940; dated May 2005,November 2006, June 2005, and September 2006, respectivelyIPM9D Calibration Forms; Instrument Nos. 298; dated May 13, 2005Plant Technical Procedures 64.120.040 and 64.120.041; Containment Area High RangeRadiation Monitor Division I and Division II Calibration Data; dated April 2000 and February 2006and associated procedure Revision 10 and 14Radcal Corporation Calibration Report; Model 2025AC Radiation Monitor (No. 4007) with Model20X5-3 (No. 21135), Model 20X5-180 (No. 7498), and Model 20X5-1800 (No. 9959) IonChambers; dated July 2005 and May 2006SAM-11 Calibration Forms; Instrument Nos. 310 and 311; dated October 2, 2006ABACOS Helgeson Standup Counting System Calibration Records; dated November 2005 andNovember 2006Scaling Factor Report and Associated Analysis Results; dated October 2005 and February 2007CARD 05-21929; OE - Perry - Area Radiation Monitor Low Level Set Point Too High to EffectivelyNotify of Radiation Level Changes; dated March 23, 2005CARD 06-22272; Frisker Failed Source Check; dated April 12, 2006CARD 06-24942; RP Program Enhancement - Drywell Initial Entry; dated July 31, 2006CARD 07-20068; ARM Alarm During Pumping of Waste Collector Tank; dated January 05, 2007CARD 07-20118; Evaluate Trend of Area Radiation Area Alarm Occurrences for Commonalities;dated January 09, 2007CARD 07-21616; NRC Concern Regarding CHRRMS Calibration; dated March 22, 2007Nuclear Quality Assurance Audit Report 05-0113; dated November 11, 2005Fermi 2 General Administration Conduct Manual MGA13 - Fermi Medical Requirements;Revision 13Fermi 2 Radiological Emergency Team Rosters Matrix; dated March 2007Fermi 2 Respiratory Protection Qualification Matrix; dated March 2007Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Maintenance and Inspection Logs; selected dates June 2005- March 2007Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Inventory; dated March 22, 2007Plant Technical Procedure 65.000.707; Inspection of MSA Respiratory Equipment; Revision 10Plant Technical Procedure 65.000.736; Operation of The Breathing Air Compressors; Revision 7Lesson Plan No.
: LP-GN-509-0100; Respiratory Protection - Airborne Area Work Controls andDevices; Revision 5Lesson Plan No.
: LP-GN-509-0200; Respiratory Protection - Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus;Revision 2Lesson Plan No.
: LP-GN-509-0300; Respiratory Protection - Self-Contained Breathing Apparatusand Emergency Breathing Air; Revision 4Mine Safety Appliance Certificates for Select Members of the Radiation Protection Staff;February 2006


==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification (71151)CARD 07-20658; Temperature Increase in the==
F i n d i n gsIntrod ucti on: The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce (Green)f or th e fai lu re to v eri f y ad equate compe nsa tory ac tio ns w ere in pl ace w hi le the E OF w as una v ai la bl The A EOF w as modi f ie d s uch tha t ac tiv ati on of the f aci li ty w oul d h av e b een si gnifica ntl y de la y ed.D e sc ri p ti o n: Th e l i ce n se e s ta rt e d r e mo d e l i n g th e E OF w h i ch r e n d e re d t h e E OF una v ai la bl e for fiv e d ay s b egin ni ng Fe brua ry 19 , 20 0 A s a co mpen sato ry ac tio n, th e li cen see pl ann ed to u se thei r A EOF f or e mergency res pon se if requi re The AE OF i s a medi um-si z ed mul tip urpo se con f eren ce roo Insi de the AE OF i s a l ocked stora ge roo m w ith the requi red materi al s s uch as pro ced ures , map s, d ose as ses sment compu ter, e tc.On F ebru ary 21 , 20 07, tw o d ay s a f ter th e re mode li ng be gan, the i nsp ecto rs i nformed th e licensee of their desir e to tour the AEOF t o v erif y the r eadiness of the f acility w hich is lo cate d i n a D etroi t E di son bu il di ng ap prox ima tel y 25 mi le s from Fe rm A membe r of the Fermi E RO met the in spe ctors at th e faci li t U pon arri v al , the i nsp ecto rs a nd li cen see repre sen tati v e d is cov ered tha t l ocks h ad bee n i nsta ll ed on the doo rs to the co nference room w ithout the licensee's k nowl edg T he lock s w ere inst alled sev eral days previ ously to h el p s ecu re c ompu ters in the roo m tha t w ere bei ng use d to tes t an up grade to th e 22 En cl osu re c o m p a n y's ne t wo r O n ly t wo k e ys wer e av a il a b le , bo t h of whi c h wer e m a in t a in e d by t wo admi ni strati v e a ssi stan ts w ho w ork duri ng the da y an d a re n ot o n a ny rel ev ant pagi ng or ca l l-o u t l i st.The A EOF acti v ati on proc edu re s tated tha t a key to the stora ge roo m i s kept w ith the Re gion al S y stem S upe rv is or, a po si tio n i n th e b ui ld in g staff ed con tin ual ly i n th e R egio nal Operati ons C ente r (R OC); h ow ev er, D etroi t E di son co nso li date d s ev eral mon ths ago a nd mo v e d t h i s p o si ti o n t o a l o ca ti o n 2 5 mi l e s a w a E v e n a fter t h e c o n so l i d a ti o n , th e R OC re ma i n e d c o n ti n u o u sl y l o cke d b e h i n d ke y-c a rd e d d o o r A fter 4 5 mi n u te s, t h e i n sp e ct o rs and the l ic ens ee w ere abl e to l oca te o ne of the f ew i ndi v id ual s w ho cou ld op en the doo r a n d ga i n a cc e ss t o t h e R O A ke y t o t h e s to ra ge ro o m w a s a l so s ta ged i n t h e E OF , b u t li cen see sta f f w oul d h av e gon e d ire ctl y to the AE OF i f res pon di ng f rom h ome duri ng off ho ur F urthe r, rad io s th e l ic ens ee w oul d h av e re li ed on f or o f f si te d ose as ses sment team s w ere also locat ed in the ROC.
: DW Equipment Sump; dated 02/03/2007CARD 07-20659; DW Equipment Sump Temperature Indicating Higher Than Expected in theMCR; dated 02/03/2007
: AttachmentCARD 07-20662; Suspect Valve Not Fully Closing on Demand from Recirculation;dated 02/04/2007CARD 07-20708; G1154-F018, DW Equip Drn Sump Inbd Cntm Iso Vlv, Thermal Overload Trip;dated 02/06/2007Drawing 6I721-2251-3; R/W Sys-Drywell Equipment Drain Sump 71 Pump GI101-C006A;Revision N, dated 09/23/92Drawing 6I721-2251-40; R/W Sys Drywell Equip Drain Sump Recirc & Disch Valves G1154F015and F018; Revision Y, dated 03/03/03Drawing 6I721-2255-10; Radwaste System Instrument Loop Part 4Drywell Equipment Drain Sump Temperature 02/04-19/2007; Revision V, 05/03/2006EP-540; Drills and Exercises; Revision 26EP-540, Enclosure E; NRC Performance Indicators - Radiological Emergency Response Plan;dated February 22, 2006Records of DEP Indicator Opportunities; dated April 2006 through December 2006Records of Key ERO Drill and Exercise Participation; dated April 2006 through December 2006Records of ANS Siren Test Results; dated April 2006 through December 2006


==Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems (71152)CARD 07-20510; Maintenance Performed on Wrong Equipment; dated 01/29/2007CARD 07-20590; Common Cause Analysis on Select==
Ha d th e l ic ens ee nee ded to staff the A EOF duri ng off-normal ho urs, thes e u nforseen ci r cu m st an ce s c ou ld h ave del aye d t he ac t ivat ion of th e f ac ilit y w hic h c ou ld h ave adv erse ly aff ecte d th e a bi li ty of the l ic ens ee to p rotec t the pu bl ic i n th e e v ent of an emergenc C ons equen tly , the facil ity cu stod ia n d is abl ed the lo cks, the li cen see est ablished a continuous w atc h at the AEO F, and cor pora te sec urit y auth orized all EOF mem bers access t o the ROC.
: CARDs; dated 01/13/2007CARD 07-20695; Supplemental Personnel Working on Equipment Without Proper ProtectionOrder; dated 02/05/2007CARD 07-20781; Unplanned Entry into TS 3.8.7; dated 02/08/2007CARD 07-20785; Valves Found Out of Position During Panel Walkdown; dated 02/12/2007CARD 07-20857; Perform a Common Cause Analysis on Station "Work Quality";dated 02/13/2007CARD 07-20927; Failure to Process an LCR for Emergency Operations Facility Upgrade;dated 02/16/2007CARD 07-21069; Communication Upgrade Notification; dated 02/23/2007CARD 07-21083; Lack of Engineering Evaluation Prior to Commencing Modification of the EOD Facility; dated 02/23/2007 CARD 07-21174; P&ID -2223 Configuration Control Issue; dated 02/28/2007CARD 07-21196; Work Request Released and Working Without Adequate Protection;dated 02/28/2007CARD 07-21519; Adverse Performance Trend Identified in Maintenance; dated 03/15/2007CARD 07-21652; Missed Replacement of Relay, Caused Performance of Surveillance Two ExtraTimes; dated 03/23/2007Common Cause Analysis Report for CARD 07-20590; dated March 28, 2007Fermi 2 Station Quarterly Trend Report, 4 Quarter (October thru December) 2006thLeader Brief by Kevin Hlavaty; dated 02/07/2007Licensing Change Request DSN; MLS08001; Reflect the change to the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Floor Plan; Revision 9, dated 02/23/2007MEMO
: NANT-07, 01/22/2007; December Performance Trending Results; dated 01/22/2007MLS14; Changes, Tests and Experiments; Revision 6MLS Appendix B; Applicability Determination Manual; Revision 8MLS14002; 50.59 Screen; Revision 5MLS14003; 50.59 Evaluation; Revision 2Root Cause Determination for CARD 07-20510; Maintenance Performed on Wrong Equipment;dated 02/16/2007
: Attachment


==Section 4OA5: Other Activities (71153)CARD 07-20733; Failed Seal on South==
The l ic ens ee di d n ot p hy si cal ly v eri f y the rea di nes s o f the A EOF pri or to remo v in g the E OF fro m s e rv i ce b u t ra th e r v e ri fie d t h a t th e l a st s u rv e i l l a n ce w a s sa ti sfa ct o ri l y c o mp l e te d. The l ic ens ee f urthe r co ncl ude d th at th e o nl y co ntrol s i n p la ce to e nsu re th e re adi nes s o f th e r o o m w a s v i a a n i n form a l v e rb a l a gre e me n t w i th s u p e rv i so ry p e rs o n n e l i n t h e b u i l d i n g. As suc h, a formal "le tter o f agree ment" b etw een F ermi an d D etroi t E di son's F aci li tie s a nd Ass et M ana gement w as si gned to e nsu re p rope r co ntrol s re mai ned i n p la ce.A n a l y si s: The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d t h e fai l u re t o v e ri fy a d e qua te c o mp e n sa to ry measu res w ere in pl ace pri or to remo v in g the EOF f rom se rv ic e w as a p erformance defici enc y w arran tin g a s igni f ic anc e d etermi nati o The in spe ctors dete rmin ed the is sue w as more than mi nor bec aus e i t w as si mil ar to an ex ampl e que sti on in IM C 061 2, Ap pen di x E , i n th at th e A EOF and the pro ced ures for acti v ati ng the A EOF w ere in a con di tio n th at w oul d h av e a f f ecte d th e l ic ens ee's res pon se to a n e mergenc U si ng IM C 060 9, A ppe ndi x B , "E mergency P repa redn ess S igni f ic anc e D etermi nati on Pro ces s"d a te d M a rc h 6 , 2 0 0 3 , th e i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d t h i s i ss u e w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety si gnifica nce (Green) be cau se the dura tio n for w hi ch ade quate compe nsa tory mea sure s w e re n o t i n p l a ce w h i l e t h e E OF w a s n o t fun ct i o n a l w a s l e ss t h a n s e v e n d a y s. (F IN 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 7 0 0 2-0 2).En f orce ment: The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the requi rements of 10 C FR 50 , A ppe ndi x B , an d 1 0 C F R 5 0.4 7 a n d d e te rmi n e d t h i s fin d i n g d i d n o t i n v o l v e a v i o l a ti o n o f N R C r e qui re me n ts si nce ne ith er th e A EOF nor the EOF are safety-rel ated an d th e i ssu e d id no t i nv ol v e e ith er a d egrada tio n o r the au gm enta tio n o f the facil ity bu t rath er th e ti mel in ess of acti v ati ng the f acilit T he inspect ors revi ew ed the licensee'
: RWCU Recirc Pump B; dated 02/06/2007CARD 07-21198; PMT Failure - Abnormal Noise and Subsequent S/D of South RWCU Pump;dated 02/28/2007Operator Log; 02/06/2007 to 02/08/2007Revised CDF Risk Profile for the Week of 2/26 to 3/5Risk Management Plan; RWCU Leak Identification, Isolation, and System Restoration; dated02/06/2007Troubleshooting Data Sheet, CARD 07-20733, G3303C001B, South RWCU Pump
s Emer g ency Pl an and deter mined that it did not requi re faci li ty ac tiv ati on w ith in an y pre scri bed ti me l imi The refore, al l emergency p l a n n i n g s ta n d a rd s w e re s a ti sfi e Th i s i ss u e h a s b e e n e n te re d i n to t h e l i ce n se e's 23 En cl osu re corre cti v e a cti on program a s C AR D 07-2 103 Once the is sue w as id enti f ie d, th e l i ce n se e e n su re d t h e l o cks w e re d i sa b l e d a n d c o n ti n u o u sl y s ta ff e d t h e A E OF w i th a n E OF member unti l pos iti v e c ontro ls w ere in pl ace to ens ure con tin ued av ai la bi li ty of the A EOF.4OA5 Other A cti v iti es.1 (C l o se d) U R I (0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 5 0 1 6-0 1): R e v i e w o f Fe rmi 2 l i ce n si n g b a si s w i th r e gar d t o the miti gatio n o f torn ado eff ects.Du rin g the prev io us in spe cti on, the li cen see w as not abl e to pro v id e a n a nal y si s o r oth er d o cu me n ta ti o n t o d e mo n st ra te t h a t th e R H R c o mp l e x a n d i ts e n cl o se d c o mp o n e n ts w e re cap abl e o f w ith stan di ng the de pres suri z ati on eff ects that cou ld oc cur if a torna do pas sed di rectl y ov er th e b ui ld in The i nsp ecto rs p ostu la ted that if a torna do dep ress uri z ati on z one pa sse d b y the R HR co mpl ex , the ou tsi de ai r pre ssu re w oul d b e h ighe r tha n th e redu ced pre ssu re i nsi de the di ese l genera tor ro oms, th ereb y cl osi ng the grav ity ex hau st damp er The in spe ctors pos tul ated tha t thi s p hen omen on cou ld res ul t i n a max imu m pres sure di f f eren tia l of 3 p si d b etw een the no rmal ou tsi de atmosp heri c p ress ure and the redu ced i nsi de atmosp heri c p ress ur Thi s d iff eren tia l pres sure co ul d d ev el op acro ss both the v enti la tio n s y stem i ntake a nd ex hau st d ampe rs a s w el l as acro ss the bui ld in g str uct ural com ponent s such as the roo Th e inspecto rs were concer ned that the EDG su p p o rt s y st e ms o r th e s tr u ct u re t h a t e n cl o se d t h e E D Gs c o u l d , th e re fore , b e d a ma ged. This i ssu e w as con si dere d a n u nres ol v ed ite m (UR I 05 000 341/200 501 6-01) pe ndi ng f urt her r evi ew of Ferm i 2's li censing basis by the NRC.The i n sp e ct o rs p e rfor me d a n i n i ti a l r e v i e w o f N U R E G-0 7 9 8 , "S a fety E v a l u a ti o n R e p o rt R e l a te d t o t h e Op e ra ti o n o f E n ri co F e rmi A to mi c P o w e r P l a n t, D o cke t N o. 5 0-3 4 1 ,"date d J ul y 19 8 S ecti on 3.2.2 , "Torna do De si gn Cri teri a," d esc rib ed NR R's re v ie w of the Fer mi 2 tor nado desig n crite ri T he docum ent con cluded that the desig n basis torna do and the pro ced ures us ed f or c al cul ati ng l oad in gs on structu res met the app li cab le requi rements of Re gula tory Gui de 1.76 an d w as acc epta bl The d ocu ment f urthe r sta ted that "the use of the se proc edu res prov id es ass uran ce that, in the ev ent of a d esi gn ba si s to rnad o, th e s tructu ral i ntegri ty of the pl ant structu res that nee d to be d e si gne d for t o rn a d o s w i l l n o t b e i mp a i re d a n d , i n c o n se que n ce , sa fety-r e l a te d s y st e ms and co mpon ents l oca ted w ith in the se structu res w il l be ade quatel y pro tecte d a nd may be expected to perf orm their neces sar y saf ety f unct ions as req uired." Th e inspecto rs cou ld not det erm ine if t his saf ety ev aluation rep ort considere d the issue descr ibed above since it di d n ot a ppe ar to ad dres s re-pres suri z ati on eff ect The in spe ctors al so note d th at Re gula tory Gui de 1.76 de scri bed the de si gn ba si s to rnad o, b ut i t di d n ot d is cus s th e structu ral de si gn requi rements for torna do prote cti on.The i ss u e w a s d i sc u ss e d w i th N R R p e rs o n n e l a n d i t w a s d e te rmi n e d t h a t l i ce n se e s w e re not spe ci f ic al ly requi red to a nal y z e th e s tructu ral i ntegri ty of the H VA C sy stems, or o ther i n te rn a l s y st e ms , i n C a te gor y I s tr u ct u re s to w i th st a n d t o rn a d o d e p re ss u ri z a ti o n e ff e ct s. H o w e v e r, i n N R C R e gul a to ry I ss u e S u mma ry (R IS) 2 0 0 6-2 3 , "P o st-To rn a d o Op e ra b i l i ty of Ven til ati ng an d A ir-C ond iti oni ng Sy stems Ho use d i n E mergency D ie sel Gen erato r Ro om s" dat ed Dec em be r 6, 200 6, th e NR C st af f co nc lud ed th at lice ns ee s m ay no t have a d e qua te l y c o n si d e re d t o rn a d o w i n d a n d p re ss u re-d ro p e ff e ct s o n s a fety-r e l a te d s y st e ms a n d c o mp o n e n ts i n si d e b u i l d i n g s tr u ct u re s o p e n t o t h e o u ts i d e e n v i ro n me n The R IS f urthe r do cumen ted that li cen see s s hou ld take a ny ne ces sary mea sure s to en sure the ope rabi li ty of v enti la tio n a nd ai r co ndi tio ni ng du ct s y stems lo cate d i n E DG ro om En cl osu reThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d a w al kdow n o f F ermi 2 RH R/E DG c ompl ex , rev ie w ed v ari ous pl ant doc umen ts, e ngaged i n d is cus si ons w ith se v eral pl ant pers onn el an d ma de the fol l o w i n g qu a l i ta ti v e a ss e ss me n t:*
: Attachment
Du rin g a to rnad o (d epre ssu riz ati on outs id e), th e ro of mounte d E DG/RH R and swi tch g ear r oom HVAC exhaust dam pers (all of w hich are m issile protec ted) w ill ope n to equa li z e th e p ress ure, so no di f f eren tia l pres sure (dp) w il l ex is t be tw een t h e i n s i d e a n d o u t s i d e o f t h e E D G/R H R b u i l d i n g.*
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
After a torna do pas ses the bu il di ng (re-p ress uri z ati on outs id e), th e E DG/RH R and swi tch g ear r oom HVAC intak e damp ers w ill each allow in-leak ag e of approximat ely 300 cu bi c feet p er mi nute of ai r thro ugh e x is tin g ope ni ngs (un der f ul ly cl ose d pos iti on), there by red uci ng the po stul ated 3 psi dp be tw een i nsi de and ou tsi de the bu ild ing s c on si de r ab ly and eq ua lizin g th e pr es su r e r ela t ively q uic k ly.*
: [[USEDAD]] [[]]
Al l the ess enti al sw itc hgear, ED G con trol pa nel s, a nd M CC are su f f ic ie ntl y v ente d, w h i ch e l i mi n a te d t h e d i ff e re n ti a l p re ss u re c o n ce rn s e x p re ss e d i n t h e U R I.*
AMS
The ro of sla b h ad suff ic ie nt d esi gn margin to w ith stan d th e e f f ects of a to rnad o.*
Agency wide Documents Access and Management SystemANS
T he two of f site power sourc es/swi tch yard av ailable at Fer mi 2 are g eog raph ically sep arate d (o ne lo cate d a t the so uth si de and the oth er a t the w est si de of the p l a n t), w h i ch c o n si d e ra b l y r e d u ce s th e p ro b a b i l i ty o f a to rn a d o c a u si n g c o mp l e te lo ss of of f si te p ow er a t Fe rmi 2.*
Alert and Notification SystemARM
The E DG c ombu sti on ai r i ntake a nd ex hau st a re u naff ecte d b y the depr essur iz ation and re-
Area Radiation MonitorCARD
pres sur iz ation ef f ect s of a tornad o based on their lo cati on and the fact tha t the y are w el l shi el ded from torna do born e mi ssi le s.*
Condition Assessment Resolution DocumentCFR
The o n l y c o mp o n e n t th a t ma y ma l fun ct i o n/d a ma ge d u ri n g re-p re ss u ri z a ti o n a fter a torna do is the E DG/RH R room v enti la tio n e x hau st grav ity da mper moun ted on the roo D amage to thi s d ampe r do es not aff ect the immed ia te o pera bi li ty of the ED Gs, R HR se rv ic e w ater and E DG s erv ic e w ater pump This w il l onl y aff ect the ro o m h e a t u p r a t Op e ra to r a ct i o n s i n r e sp o n se t o t h e E D G r o o m t e mp e ra tu re alarm s (in the cont rol room) are ex pect ed to res tor e EDG/RHR room HVAC sy st e ms i n a t i me l y ma n n e r.The i nsp ecto rs a ls o re v ie w ed the app li cab il ity rev ie w of thi s R IS con duc ted by the l ic ens ee and do cumen ted in an atta chmen t to CA RD 05-264 9 The in spe ctors con cl ude d th at th e app li cab il ity rev ie w pe rf ormed by the l ic ens ee w as ade quate as it w as bas ed on the si mi l a r qua l i ta ti v e a ss e ss me n t/a rgu me n ts a s d e sc ri b e d a b o v Th e re fore , th e i n sp e ct o rs dete rmin ed no performance de f ic ie nci es or v io la tio ns of regula tory requi rements oc curre d and no ad di tio nal en f orce ment acti on w as w arran te The in spe ctors had no further con cern s i n th is are This un reso lv ed ite m i s c lo sed..2 (C l o se d) U R I (0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 5 0 1 6-0 2): R e v i e w o f Fe rmi 2 l i ce n si n g b a si s w i th r e gar d to th e p oten tia l rel eas e p ath v ia the co nde nsa te s torage tank (C ST) foll ow in g the lo ss of coolant accident (LO CA)
Code of Federal RegulationsCST
25 En cl osu reDu rin g the 200 5 S afety S y stem D esi gn an d P erformance Ca pab il ity i nsp ecti on, the in spe ctors id enti f ie d a n u nres ol v ed ite m con cern in g a p oten tia l radi oac tiv e re le ase path v ia the CST f ollow ing a LOC W hile i n stand by, the RCIC system is norm ally al igne d to the C ST thro ugh a ch eck v al v e E 515 0F0 11 (F01 1) a nd normal ly op en motor ope rated v al v e (M OV) E 515 0F0 10 (F01 0). W hen the l ev el i n th e C ST de crea ses to a pred etermi ned se tpoi nt o r w hen the l ev el i n th e s upp ress io n p ool i ncre ase s to a pred eter mined setpoint , the suction pat h sw itches to the suppr ession pool as the nor ma lly cl ose d M OVs E5 150 F02 9 (F 029) an d E 515 0F0 31 (F03 1) o pen an d M OV F 010 cl ose s.The H PC I sy stem functi ons i n a si mil ar ma nne r w ith C ST su cti on che ck v al v e E 415 0F0 19 (F01 9) a nd normal ly op en M OV E 415 0F0 04 (F00 4) a nd the sup pres si on poo l suc tio n v a l v e s, n o rma l l y c l o se d M OV s E 4 1 5 0 F 0 4 1 (F 0 4 1) a n d E 4 1 5 0 F 0 4 2 (F 0 4 2). The i nsp ecto rs w ere con cern ed that the li cen see di d n ot l eak tes t the C ST su cti on or th e suppr ession pool suct ion v alv e T he inspect ors postulat ed that f ollow ing a design basis LOCA an d a ran ge of in termedi ate brea k LOCA s, th e p ress ure di f f eren tia l betw een the su p p re ss i o n p o o l a n d C S T c o u l d c a u se p o te n ti a l l y c o n ta mi n a te d , ra d i o a ct i v e w a te r to be trans f erred from the sup pres si on poo l to th e C ST thro ugh th e M OVs and ch eck v al v e A s th e C ST i s v ente d, th is co ul d re sul t i n a rad io acti v e re le ase ou tsi de of the curre nt 1 0 C FR 10 0 a nd Genera l De si gn Cri teri a 1 9 re quire ments.The l ic ens ee doc umen ted thi s i ssu e a s C AR D 05-2 669 The l ic ens ee bel ie v ed that the sec ond ary co ntai nmen t by pas s l eakage p ostu la ted in the ab ov e s cen ari o w as not part of pl ant des ign and l ic ens in g basi The l ic ens ee bas ed thi s p osi tio n i n p art o n th e re spo nse to th e Thre e M il e Is la nd (TM I) Ques tio n H.III.1.1.1, w hi ch state d th at th e C ST w as id enti f ie d a s i sol ated from hi ghly co ntami nate d s y stem The li cen see al so state d th at th e p l a n t d e s i gn a n d l i c e n s i n g b a s i s a s s u me d e me r ge n c y c o r e c o o l i n g s y s t e m l i qu i d l e a ka ge occ urred w ith in the se con dary co ntai nmen t bo und ary an d w as li mite d to a rate of 5 ga llons per minut Furt herm ore, UFSAR Sect ion 6.2.1.2.2.3 ident if ied that the HPCI and R CIC C ST su cti on li nes w ere ex cl ude d a s b y pas s l eakage p aths on the ba si s th at they w ere sea le d w ith w ater. The i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the C ST w oul d b e i sol ated f rom co ntami nate d s ourc es if the v al v es in questi on w ere sho w n to be l eak-tigh Be cau se thi s h as not bee n d emon strate d, th e i nsp ecto rs b el ie v ed the li cen see may no t be mee tin g th e i r l i ce n si n g a n d d e si gn b a si s. NR C Re v ie w an d C onc lu si on:D u ri n g th i s fol l o w u p i n sp e ct i o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d s e v e ra l l i ce n se e d o cu me n ts in cl udi ng UF SA R sec tio ns and tab le s; i nse rv ic e te sti ng requi rements an d d ocu ments;and HPCI and RCIC Desig n Basis Docume nt Th e inspecto rs also cons ulted NRR pers onn el an d re v ie w ed tw o re la ted task i nterface agreemen t res pon ses at Su squeha nna (TAC# M 862 76) and H.B Ro bi nso n (TIA 94-2 2) p la nt The in spe ctors dete rmin ed that w ith res pec t to li cen si ng or pos t-TM I l ic ens e c ond iti ons , v al v es w hi ch is ol ate pote nti al p a th w a y s w e re n o t co n si d e re d c o n ta i n me n t i so l a ti o n v a l v e s su b je ct t o l o ca l l e a k ra te testi n A ls o, th e s ourc e te rms i n th e l ic ens in g basi s for pl ants do no t as sume w ater le akage as a c ontri buto r to off-si te d ose Therefore, th e i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t the li cen see w as not requi red to l eak tes t the v al v es in questi on.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the li cen see's ac tio ns in res pon se to C AR Ds 05-2 669 9 a nd 05-2 667 The l ic ens ee imp le mented the foll ow in g acti ons:
Condensate Storage TankDRP
26 En cl osu re*
Division of Reactor ProjectsDRS
Re v is ed mai nten anc e p racti ces by requi rin g peri odi c d is ass embl y an d i nsp ecti on of the HP CI che ck v al v e (F 019) i n th e C ST su cti on li n The f irs t di sas sembl y an d i n sp e ct i o n w a s sa ti sfa ct o ri l y c o mp l e te d d u ri n g a r e ce n t re fue l i n g o u ta ge. *
Division of Reactor SafetyECOS
Revi sed the inservice tes ting prog ram to include str ok e test ing of the RCIC CST suc tio n l in e v al v e F 01 In ad di tio n, th e l ic ens ee pl ann ed to p erform a re v erse le ak test on the RC IC che ck v al v e F 011 w hi ch w as al read y su bjecte d to rou tin e p re v e n ti v e ma i n te n a n ce d i sa ss e mb l y a n d i n se rv i ce i n sp e ct i o *
Emergency Call Out SystemEDG
R e v i se d t h e i n se rv i ce t e st i n g p ro gra m t o i n cl u d e p e ri o d i c st ro ke te st i n g R C IC M OVs F029 and F01 Th e initial baseline str ok e-t ime te sting w as com pleted in F e b ru a ry 2 0 0 The i nsp ecto rs gene ral ly agree d w ith the l ic ens ee's d is pos iti on that und er a ll sc ena rio s, after con si deri ng si ngle fail ures , at le ast one sa f ety-rel ated v al v e w oul d b e functi ona l as a b arri e In s ome sce nari os, pea k acci den t co ndi tio ns w oul d re sul t i n s uff ic ie nt to rus p re ss u re t o l i ft e me rge n cy c o re c o o l i n g s y st e m w a te r to t h e C S T v i a t h e s u ct i o n l i n e s. The e mergency op erati ng pro ced ures w oul d d ire ct th e o pera tors to i ni tia te th e to rus spra y s e arl y i n th e e v ent, thus the pe rio d o f ti me d uri ng w hi ch torus pre ssu re w oul d b e su ff i ci e n t to p u sh w a te r to w a rd t h e C S T i s e x p e ct e d t o b e v e ry s h o rt , a b o u t o n e d a y. Be cau se of the la rge v ol ume of pi pi ng be tw een the C ST an d th e C ST sw ap is ol ati on v al v es and ty pi cal v al v e l eak rate s, th e i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t i t w oul d ta ke many d a y s to fi l l t h e H P C I a n d R C IC C S T s u ct i o n l i n e The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d n o p e rfor ma n ce d e fic i e n ci e s o r v i o l a ti o n s o f re gul a to ry re qui re me n ts w e re i d e n ti fie d a n d n o a d d i ti o n a l e n forc e me n t a ct i o n w a s w a rr a n te d. The i nsp ecto rs h ad no f urthe r co nce rns in thi s a re Thi s u nres ol v ed ite m i s c lo sed.4 OA 6 E x i t M e e t i n gs.1 E x i t M e e ti n g S u mma ryOn A pri l 5, 2 007 , the i nsp ecto rs p rese nted the i nsp ecti on resu lts to M r. J. Da v is an d o ther me mb e rs o f l i ce n se e ma n a gem e n t a t th e c o n cl u si o n o f th e i n sp e ct i o Th e i n sp e ct o rs asked the li cen see w heth er a ny mate ria l ex ami ned du rin g the in spe cti on sho ul d b e con si dere d p ropri etar N o p ropri etary i nformatio n w as id enti f ie d..2 I n t e r i m E x i t M e e t i n gsThe fol l o w i n g i n te ri m e x i t me e ti n gs w e re c o n d u ct e d for: *
Emergency Diesel GeneratorEOF
Emergenc y P repa redn ess i nsp ecti on w ith M r. D. Gi pso n o n M arch 9, 200 7;*
Emergency Operations FacilityAEOF
Occup ati ona l radi ati on safety pro gram f or ra di ati on moni tori ng i nstru mentati on and prote cti v e e quip ment w ith M ess rs. D. C obb an d K. H la v aty on M arch 23 , 20 07.4OA7 Li cen see-Iden tifie d V io la tio nsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.A TTA C H M E N T: S U P P L E M E N TA L I N F OR M A TION 1
Alternate Emergency Operations FacilityEP
A tt a ch me n t S U P P L E ME N T A L I N F OR MA T ION KEY POINTS OF CONTA CT Li cen see J. D av is , S eni or V ic e P resi den t an d C hi ef Nuc le ar Off ic er D. Gi b so n , E x e cu ti v e V i ce P re si d e n t a n d C h i e f N u cl e a r Off i ce r D. Co bb, Ass is tant Vi ce Pre si den t N ucl ear Genera tio n K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger B. Be rtossi , R adi ati on Pro tecti on K. Bu rke, Su perv is or, P erformance En gine eri ng R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Ha rman, R adi ati on Pro tecti on A. Ha sso un, Pri nci pal Li cen si ng En gine er D. Ku sumaw ati , E ngin eer, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng R. Li bra, Di recto r N ucl ear En gine eri ng K. M orri s, E mergency P repa redn ess S upe rv is or D. No etz el , M ana ger Nu cl ear Sy stem E ngin eeri ng B. O'D onn el l, M ana ger, Pe rf ormanc e E ngin eeri ng M. P hi li ppo n, Ope rati ons M ana ger G. Pi cca rd, M ana ger, Ra di ati on Pro tecti on J. P lo na, Di recto r, N ucl ear En gine eri ng J. P rie st, R adi ati on Pro tecti on Su perv is or T. Van derM ay , R adi ati on Pro tecti on NRC C. Li pa, Ch ie f , D iv is io n o f R eac tor P rojects , B ranc h 4 S. Orth, Le ade r, D iv is io n o f R eac tor S afety , P la nt S upp ort Tea m K. Ri emer, C hi ef, Di v is io n o f R eac tor S afety , P la nt S upp ort B ranc h A. Sto ne, Di v is io n o f R eac tor S afety , B ranc h 2 2
Emergency PreparednessERO
A tt a ch me n tLIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, A ND DISCUSSED Opene d a nd Cl ose d 050 003 41/2 007 002-01 NC V Fai lu re to P erform a C ompl ete Ca li brati on of the Co ntai nmen t H igh Ra nge A rea Ra di ati on M oni tor050 003 41/2 007 002-02 FIN Inad equate Ve rifica tio n o f A lte rnate E mergency Operati ons F aci li ty R ead in ess Cl ose d 050 003 41/2 005 016-01 UR I Re v ie w of Fe rmi 2 l ic ens in g basi s w ith regard to the miti gatio n o f torn ado eff ects.050 003 41/2 005 016-02 UR I Re v ie w of Fe rmi 2 l ic ens in g basi s w ith regard to the pote nti al rel eas e p ath v ia the co nde nsa te s torage tank fol l o w i n g th e l o ss o f co o l a n t a cc i d e n t.Di scu sse d No n A tt a ch me n tLIST OF DOCUM ENT S REVIEWED The foll ow in g is a li st o f do cumen ts re v ie w ed duri ng the i nsp ecti o Inc lu si on on thi s l is t do es not imp ly tha t the N RC i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the doc umen ts i n th ei r en tire ty bu t rath er th at s el ecte d se ct i o n s o f po rt i o n s o f th e d o cu me n ts w e re e v a l u a te d a s p a rt o f th e o v e ra l l i n sp e ct i o n e ff o rt. In cl u si o n o f a d o cu me n t o n t h i s l i st d o e s n o t i mp l y N R C a cc e p ta n ce o f th e d o cu me n t o r a n y p a rt o f i t, u n l e ss t h i s i s st a te d i n t h e b o d y o f th e i n sp e ct i o n r e p o rt.Se ction 1R 01: A dv ers e We athe r P rote ction 200 7 C ol d W eath er P repa rati ons Se ction 1R 04: E quip ment A lignme nt CA RD 06-221 25; Bro ken E le ctri cal F le x C ond ui t; da ted 04/1 0/20 06 CA RD 06-225 90; NR C Iden tifie d C onc ern W ith D iv. I C ore Sp ray an d D efense In D epth;date d 0 4/21/200 6 CA RD 06-229 11; Pa cking L eak On E2 100-F00 7A; da ted 04/2 8/20 06 CA RD 06-229 12; Pa cking L eak On E2 100-F00 6B; da ted 04/2 8/20 06 CA RD 06-233 66; Co re S pray P ump M otors Oi l Co ol er S eal in g Baff le A ddi tio ns; date d 05/1 5/20 06 CA RD 07-214 58; Fai le d P M T due to ex ces si v e d ead ban d i n R CIC turb in e o il fil ter s w itc h;date d 0 3/13/200 7 Dra w in g 6M 721-203 4; D ia gram Core S pray S y stem R eac tor B ui ld in g; dated 10/21/0 5 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 7; C ore Sp ray S y stem F unc tio nal Ope rati ng Sketch; da ted 10/2 1/05 D ra w i n g 6 M 7 2 1-5 7 0 9-1; R e a ct o r C o re I so l a ti o n C o o l i n g S y st e m F u n ct i o n a l Op e ra ti n g S ket ch; date d 0 5/18/200 6 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 6-1; Re si dua l He at R emov al D iv is io n II Sy stem F unc tio nal Ope rati ng Sketch;date d 0 3/05/200 4 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 6-3; Re si dua l He at R emov al S erv ic e W ater M ake U p D eca nt a nd Ov erflow Sy stems Fun cti ona l Operati ng Sketch; da ted 06/3 0/20 06 Jo b I D 0 1 7 5 0 6 1 0 0 6; P e rfor m 2 4.2 0 3.0 3 S e c-5.1 C S S P u mp A n d V a l v e Op e ra b i l i ty Te st;date d 1 0/06/200 6 Pro ced ure 23.2 03; Co re S pray S y stem; R ev is io n 4 0 Pro ced ure 24.2 03.0 3; D iv is io n 2 C SS P ump and V al v e Op erab il ity , an d A utomati c A ctua tio n;Re v is io n 4 5 Pro ced ure 23.2 06; Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g Sy stem; R ev is io n 8 6 Pro ced ure 23.2 05; Re si dua l He at R emov al S y stem; R ev is io n 9 8 Pro ced ure 23.2 08; RH R Co mpl ex S erv ic e W ater Sy stems; Re v is io n 8 5 ST-ES-339-002 8-00 1; C ore Sp ray S y stem E 210 0; R ev is io n 2 Se ction 1R 05Q: F ire Pro tectio n UF SA R Fi gure 9 A-4; Fi re P rotec tio n E v al uati on Re acto r an d A ux il ia ry B ui ld in gs Fi rst F lo or P la n;Re v is io n 1 4, d ated 11/06 Se ction 1R 06: F lood P rote ction Mea sur es AR P 2D 105; R eac tor B ui ld in g Corn er R ooms/ HP CI Ro om F lo od Lev el; R ev is io n 1 3 AR P 2D 78; Re acto r B ui ld in g Fl oor/E quip ment Dra in S umps Lev el H i-H i/L o-Lo; R ev is io n 1 4 Drawing 6M 721-2032; Sump Pum p Diagr am Radw ast e Sy ste m; Rev ision AY Drawing 6M 721-5710-2; Sum p Pumps Sy ste m Func tional Ope rat ing Ske tch; Revi sion AA 4
Emergency Response OrganizationHPCI
A tt a ch me n t Pro ced ure 47.0 00.8 4; L oca l Lea kag e R ate Testin g For Equi pmen t an d F lo or D rai n C hec k Va lv es - G11 01-F 140 7; d ated A pri l 22, 200 6 Surveill ance Schedu ling and T rac k ing; Perf orm 47.000.84 Sec 6.4 LLRT f or Floor Dra in Ch eck V al v es - G11 01F 140 7 a nd 140 8; d ated A pri l 14, 200 6 Surveill ance Schedu ling and T rac k ing; Perf orm 47.000.04 Sec 6.4 LLRT f or Eq uipme nt Dra in Ch eck V al v es G1101 F14 10 & 141 1; d ated A pri l 25, 200 6 Pe rf ormanc e E v al uati on Pro ced ure 27.7 02.0 1; R eac tor B ui ld in g Sump Cro ss-ti e F lo od Co ntrol Va lv e Tes t; R ev is io n 6 UF SA R 9.3.3; P la nt E quip ment and F lo or D rai ns UF SA R 2.4; Hy drol ogic En gine eri ng U F S A R 3.4; W a t e r L e v e l (F l o o d) D e s i gn Se ction 1R 07: H eat Sin k P erfo rmanc e ST-OP-31 5-00 65-0 01; Emergenc y D ie sel Gen erato r R 300 0; R ev is io n 1 7 W R 836 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 11 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 0/24/05 W R 840 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 12 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 0 1/30/06 W R 848 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 13 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 0/03/06 W R 844 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 14 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 1/17/06 Se ction 1R 11: L icen sed Ope rato r R equ alifica tion Eval uation Scena rio SS-O P-904-101 2; Dryw ell Pres sur e Inst. Fails/RR Pum p Fails/Sm all LO CA/Par tial Failure of ECCS Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 4; F reez e P rotec tio n L in eup V eri f ic ati on; Re v is io n 3 2 Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 6; H ot W eath er Op erati ons; R ev is io n 0 Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 7; C ol d W eath er Op erati ons; R ev is io n 0 W R W ST 94 055 2; d ated 02/13/0 7 Se ction 1R 12: Main tena nce E ffectiv ene ss Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance Pro ced ure 47.0 00.8 4; L oca l Lea kag e R ate f or E quip ment Surveill ance Perf orm ance Proc edur e 47.000.84; Sec 6.2, LLRT f or Eq uip DRN CK VL V's - G1101 F14 10 and 14 11; date d 0 4/25/200 6 Se ction 1R 13: Main tena nce R isk A sse ssme nt a nd Emer gen t Work E v alua tion CD F Ri sk Profil e for th e w eeks o f 1/2 9 to 2/5 an d 2/5 to 2/1 2 CD F Ri sk Profil e for th e w eek of 3/5 to 3/12 ED G 11 JC E x pan si on Tank Inl eakage 0 00Z 070 576; da ted 02/2 6/20 07 LE RF R is k Profil e for th e w eeks o f 1/2 9 to 2/5 an d 2/5 to 2/1 2 LE RF R is k Profil e for th e w eek of 3/5 to 3/12 Sch edu le r's E v al uati on f or F ermi 2; date d 0 3/03/200 7 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance Form 10/2 7/20 06; Pe rf orm 4 2.30 2.07 D iv 1 Bu s 6 4B 41 60V W orkw eek R is k f or W eek of 02/26/2 007 5
High Pressure Coolant InjectionHVAC
A tt a ch me n t Se ction 1R 15: Ope rab ility E v alua tions CA RD 06-276 64; AV R Genera l Al arm; da ted 12/0 3/20 06 C A R D 0 6-2 7 7 9 4; M i ss e d To rqu e a n d Ga ske t R e p l a ce me n t o n Th e rmo co u p l e Te rmi n a l C o v e r;date d 1 2/08/200 6 CA RD 06-277 94-0 2; Ope rabi li ty of TC; d ated 01/11/2 007 CA RD 07-214 21; 4D 53 AV R Genera l Al arm re cei v ed on 3/11/200 7; d ated 03/12/2 007 ODM I-06-0 09; AV R Genera l Al arm; R ev is io n 2 , da ted 12/2 1/20 06 ODM I 07-002; D W E D Su mp Temp Incre ase Li mita tio ns, Re v is io n 1 , da ted 03/2 6/20 07 Se ction 1R 19: P ost-Main tena nce T estin g CA RD 06-254 97; Tech Sp ec Va lu e for E DG M in imu m Vo lta ge i s L ow er Tha n Tec h S pec V al ue f or D iv is io n I De graded Gri d V ol tage; da ted 08/2 5/20 06 CA RD 07-212 65; RC IC Pu mp Outb oard S eal Le ak; date d 0 3/04/200 7 LC O Nu mber 200 6-04 85; R3 000 D iv is io n I ED Gs TS V al ue f or M in imu m Vo lta ge i s L ow er Tha n TS V al ue f or D iv is io n I De graded Gri d V ol tage; da ted 08/2 5/20 06 Pro ced ure 24.2 06.0 1; R CIC S y stem P ump and V al v e Op erab il ity Test; R ev is io n 6 5 Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 6; E mergency D ie sel Gen erato r 13 - Sta rt an d L oad Test; R ev is io n 4 6 S S T E v e n t 0 0 9 8; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.1 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - S l o w S ta rt S S T E v e n t 0 2 9 1; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.2 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - F a st S ta rt S S T E v e n t 0 2 9 9; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.3 1 E D G 1 2 2 4-H o u r R u n F o l l o w e d b y H o t F a st R e st a rt Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 4 S ec 5.1 ED G 11 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - S lo w Sta rt; da ted 11/2 9/20 06 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 4 S ec 5.2 ED G 11 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - F ast Sta rt; da ted 10/2 6/20 06 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 5, S ec 5.1 ED G 12 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - S lo w Sta rt; da ted 02/0 3/20 07 S u rv e i l l a n ce P e rfor ma n ce; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.2 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - F a st S ta rt;date d 1 1/02/200 6 S u rv e i l l a n ce P e rfor ma n ce; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.1 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - S l o w S ta rt;date d 1 2/02/200 6 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 29.3 07.3 0, E DG 1 1 2 4 H our Ru n F ol lo w ed by H ot F ast Re starts; date d 0 2/27/200 7 W R A4 170 601 00; Insp ect and Test Co ntrac tor a nd Ci rcui t D ev ic es f or R 160 0S 048;date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 313 8; L oos e K ni f e S w itc h a t i ts P iv ot C onn ecti on; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 170 8; R epl ace N ew F use B lo ck that w as Da maged D uri ng Fu se Insta ll ati on;date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000Z063204; Replace Contro l Tr ansf orm er X 4103C005, M CC 72EC-2C, Pos 3C; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 302 5; R epl ace C ontro l Transformer X4103 C0 06; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z07 064 2; R CIC P ump Outboa rd S eal Le ak; date d 0 3/07/200 7 Se ction 1E P2: A lert a nd No tificatio n Sy stem (A NS) E v alua tion EP-560; A le rt N oti f ic ati on Sy stem - Si ren Operati on and M ai nten anc e; R ev is io n 0 M onro e C oun ty E mergency M ana gement P la n; A nne x B; A ppe ndi x 1; Attac hmen t D; S pec ia l No tifica tio n P roce dure s; R ev is io n 1 2 A N S S i r e n M a l fu n c t i o n s a n d I n c o n gr u i t i e s S u mm a r y S h e e t s; d a t e d M a y 5 , 2 0 0 5 , t h r o u gh Feb ruary 28 , 20 07 6
Heating, Ventilation, and Air ConditioningIMC
A tt a ch me n t Lette r Fro m FE M A Re gion V; A ppro v al of Fe rmi 2 P ow er P la nt P ropo sed P ubl ic A le rt an d No tifica tio n S y stem R epl ace ment; d ated Ja nua ry 21 , 20 03 CA RD 06-260 21; AN S Co mmuni cati on Fai lu re from the M onro e C oun ty D is patc h C ontro l Sta tio n;date d S epte mber 18, 200 6 Si ren Test R esu lts R eco rds; date d M ay 25 , 20 05, throu gh Fe brua ry 28 , 20 07 C A R D 0 6-2 4 3 3 4; A l e rt a n d N o ti fic a ti o n S y st e m S i re n N u mb e r 2 7 F a i l e d M o n th l y Te st;date d J une 28 , 20 06 C A R D 0 6-2 2 8 0 6; A l e rt a n d N o ti fic a ti o n S y st e m S i re n N u mb e r 4 9 D i sp l a y i n g C OM M F A IL U R E; date d A pri l 26, 200 6 CARD 06-20370; Alert and Notif ication System Siren Number 49 Di splayi ng COM M FAILURE;date d J anu ary 26 , 20 06 CA RD 05-260 88; AN S Traf f ic D amaged Si ren Nu mber 59; date d Octo ber 31, 200 5 CA RD 05-242 58; AN S Traf f ic A cci den t D amaged Si ren Nu mber 2; d ated Ju ly 18 , 20 05 Se ction 1E P3: Emer gen cy R esp ons e Org aniz ation S taffing an d A ugme ntatio n Sy stem Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P la n, Tab le B-1; S taff in g For Fermi 2 Emergenc y R esp ons e Org ani z ati on; Re v is io n 3 1 EP-290; E mergency N oti f ic ati ons; R ev is io n 4 5 EP-292; E mergency C al l Out - Ba ckup M etho d; R ev is io n 2 8 EP-570; E mergency C al l Out S y stem - Testin g and M ai nten anc e; R ev is io n 0 QP-ER-665 , E ncl osu re A; E RO Trai ni ng Co urse s a nd Train in g M atri x; R ev is io n 2 7 Fermi 2 ER O Team Li st; d ated M arch 2, 200 7 EC OS Test Re v is io n R esu lts; da ted Jun e 1 6, 2 005 , thro ugh Ja nua ry 19 , 20 07 CA RD 07-210 01; NR C Pre-Insp ecti on Se lf-Asse ssmen t - D ev el op EC OS Trai ni ng; da ted Feb ruary 20 , 20 07 CA RD 07-207 70; NR C Pre-Insp ecti on Se lf-Asse ssmen t - B ackup Au gm enta tio n S y stem Testi ng Ev al uati on; date d F ebru ary 8, 200 7 CA RD 07-206 09; Operati ng Ex peri enc e - Dri v e In A ugmentati on Dri ll Ide nti f ie s Opp ortun iti es f or Improv emen t (D resd en); Feb ruary 1, 200 7 CA RD 06-277 63; No v embe r 29 , 20 06, EC OS P hon e R esp ons e On ly Test Au gm enta tio n W eaknes s; d ated D ece mber 7, 2 006 CA RD 06-260 33; Se ptembe r 16 , 20 06, EC OS P hon e R esp ons e On ly Test Se v eral P rogram an d Au gm enta tio n W eaknes ses; da ted Se ptembe r 18 , 20 06 CA RD 06-219 31; EP-220 D oes N ot R eflect RE RP P la n R P Techni ci an Au gm enta tio n; d ated Ap ril 5, 200 6 Se ction 1E P5: Co rrec tion of E merge ncy P rep are dne ss Weak nes ses Au di t R epo rt 06-010 2; Qua li ty A ssu ranc e A udi t of the Emergenc y P repa redn ess P rogram; da ted M a rc h 2 1 , Au di t R epo rt 05-010 9; Qua li ty A ssu ranc e A udi t of the Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e Pre pare dne ss Pl an; date d J une 28 , 20 05 NA RP-07-0 018; Fo cus ed Se lf-Asse ssmen t - N RC E mergency P repa redn ess Ins pec tio n Re adi nes s; d ated M arch 1, 200 7 NA RP-07-0 013; Qui ck Hi t S el f-Ass ess ment f or E mergency P repa redn ess; da ted Jan uary 24 , 20 07 NA RP-06-0 164; Ju ly 31 , 20 06 Un usu al E v ent De cl arati on; date d A ugust 1 0, 2 006 N A R P-0 5-0 0 5 8; Qu i ck H i t S e l f-A ss e ss me n t - E me rge n cy P re p a re d n e ss P e rfor ma n ce I n d i ca to rs Co mpari son to Indu stry; da ted M ay 12 , 20 05 7
Inspection Manual ChapterLER
A tt a ch me n t Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted Au gust 9, 200 6 Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted M ay 23 , 20 06 Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted Jun e 8 , 20 05 CA RD 06-236 30; RE RP D ril l M ay 23 , 20 06 - Fa il ed Objecti v e D ue to In corre ct P rotec tiv e A cti on Re commend ati on; date d M ay 26 , 20 06 CARD 06-20860; Audit Finding - T w o ERO Staf f Augm enta tion Positions Are Not Inc luded As Timed Re spo nse P osi tio ns Du rin g EC OS Tests or ER O Dri ll s a nd Ex erci ses; da ted Feb ruary 17 , 20 06 CA RD 06-203 16; RE RP D ril l Jan uary 18 , 20 06 - Fa il ure of Objecti v e for In iti al N oti f ic ati ons; da ted Jan uary 24 , 20 06 C A R D 0 5-2 5 0 3 2; R E R P D ri l l A u gus t 2 4 , 2 0 0 5 , In a cc u ra cy On A n I n i ti a l N o ti fic a ti o n R e su l ts I n Fai le d D ril l Objecti v e; d ated A ugust 3 1, 2 005 CA RD 05-235 05; RE RP P rogram Re commend ati ons of EC OS; d ated Ju ne 9, 2 005 CA RD 05-235 04; Au di t Fi ndi ng - Tw o R ER P Ass embl y an d A cco unta bi li ty P roce dure s A re N ot Co nsi sten t W ith the R ER P Pl an; date d J une 9, 200 5 CA RD 05-230 09; NR C Vi ol ati on, Ch ange to E mergency P repa redn ess P rogram That D ecre ase d the Eff ecti v ene ss W ith out Pri or N RC A ppro v al; M ay 12 , 20 05 Se ction 1E P6: Drill Ev alua tion RE RP D ril l Pa ckage, Sce nari o 4 2; M arch 21 , 20 07 Dri ll/Ex erci se Cri tique S ummary , S cen ari o 4 2; M arch 21 , 20 07 2OS3 R adia tion Monito ring Ins trumen tation an d Pro tectiv e E quip ment Fermi 2 Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P repa redn ess P la n; R ev is io n 3 1 Fermi 2 Techni cal R equi rements M anu al; R ev is io n 8 3 Fermi 2 TSs; TS Ba ses an d L ic ens e A mend ments 134 an d 1 59 Fermi 2 Up date d F in al S afety A nal y si s R epo rt; C hap ters 11 and 12; M ul tip le R ev is io ns Fermi 2 Ra di ati on Pro tecti on Instru ment Da il y an d W eekly C hec k Li sts; v ari ous da tes 200 6 and 20 07 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.301; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel F unc tio nal Test; R ev is io n 3 1 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.302; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 6 Ca li brati on;Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.303; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 15 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.304; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 16 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.305; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 17 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 0 9 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.611.504; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel s 1-5, 7-14 and 18-48 Ca li brati on/F unc tio nal Test; R ev is io n 1 4 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.228; Opera tio n o f the R adi ati on Pro tecti on Out-of-Serv ic e Pro gram; Rev is io n 5 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.242; C al ib rati on of NN C Gamma 60 P ortal M oni tor; R ev is io n 3 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.247; C al ib rati on Re cord s o f IP M 9D M oni tor N os. 299 an d 3 03;date d S epte mber 200 6; a nd Pro ced ure Re v is io ns 2 a nd 3 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.304; V eri f ic ati on of Gamma Ca li brato r D ose R ates; R ev is io n 6 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.245; C al ib rati on of the NE S mal l Arti cl es M oni tor; R ev is io n 3 8
Licensee Event ReportMCC
A tt a ch me n t Sy stem H eal th R epo rts; P roce ss and A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng; da ted 200 5 a nd 200 6 NN C Ca li brati on Da ta F orms; In strumen t N os. 960 060 an d 9 702 65; date d Octo ber 5 a nd 6, 2 006 , res pect iv ely Do si tec AR-20 Ca li brati on Form; Instru ment No. 30 245; da ted Se ptembe r 09 , 20 05 AM P-1 00 Ca li brati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 5 001-050 an d 5 002-077; da ted Ap ril 26 , 20 05, and Oc tobe r 10, 2005, re spect iv ely AM S-4 C al ib rati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 4 39, 439 , 19 39 and 19 40; date d M ay 20 05, November 2006, June 2005 , and Sept em ber 2006 , res pect iv ely IPM 9D C al ib rati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 2 98; date d M ay 13 , 20 05 P l a n t T e c h n i c a l P r o c e d u r e s 6 4.1 2 0.0 4 0 a n d 6 4.1 2 0.0 4 1; C o n t a i n me n t A r e a H i gh R a n ge Ra di ati on M oni tor D iv is io n I and D iv is io n II Ca li brati on Da ta; d ated A pri l 200 0 a nd Feb ruary 20 06 and as soc ia ted proc edu re R ev is io n 1 0 a nd 14 Ra dca l Co rpora tio n C al ib rati on Re port; M ode l 202 5A C Ra di ati on M oni tor (N o. 4 007) w ith M ode l 20X5-3 (N o. 2 113 5), M ode l 20X5-1 80 (No. 74 98), and M ode l 20X5-1 800 (N o. 9 959) Ion Ch ambe rs; d ated Ju ly 20 05 and M ay 20 06 SA M-11 Ca li brati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 3 10 and 31 1; d ated Octob er 2 , 20 06 AB AC OS H el geson Sta ndu p C oun tin g Sy stem C al ib rati on Re cord s; d ated N ov embe r 20 05 and No v embe r 20 06 Sca li ng Fa ctor Re port and A sso ci ated A nal y si s R esu lts; da ted Octobe r 20 05 and F ebru ary 20 07 CARD 05-21929; OE - Perr y - Area Radiation M onitor Low Lev el Set Point To o High to Ef f ect iv ely No tify of Ra di ati on Lev el C han ges; da ted M arch 23 , 20 05 CA RD 06-222 72; Fri sker Fa il ed So urce C hec k; dated A pri l 12, 200 6 CA RD 06-249 42; RP P rogram En han cemen t - D ry w el l Ini tia l En try; da ted Jul y 31 , 20 06 CA RD 07-200 68; AR M A la rm Du rin g Pumpi ng of W aste C ol le ctor Tank; date d J anu ary 05 , 20 07 CA RD 07-201 18; Ev al uate Trend of Are a R adi ati on Are a A la rm Occurre nce s for C ommona li tie s;date d J anu ary 09 , 20 07 CA RD 07-216 16; NR C Co nce rn R egardi ng CH RR M S Ca li brati on; date d M arch 22 , 20 07 Nu cl ear Qual ity A ssu ranc e A udi t R epo rt 05-011 3; d ated N ov embe r 11 , 20 05 Fermi 2 Genera l Ad min is trati on Co ndu ct M anu al M GA13 - Fermi M edi cal R equi rements;Re v is io n 1 3 Fermi 2 Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y Team R oste rs M atri x; da ted M arch 20 07 Fermi 2 Re spi ratory P rotec tio n Qu al ifica tio n M atri x; da ted M arch 20 07 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s M ai nten anc e a nd Insp ecti on Logs; s el ecte d d ates Ju ne 200 5- M arch 20 07 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s In v ento ry; da ted M arch 22 , 20 07 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.707; Ins pec tio n o f M SA R esp ira tory E quip ment; R ev is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.736; Opera tio n o f The Bre athi ng Ai r C ompres sors; R ev is io n 7 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 100; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Ai rborn e A rea W ork Co ntrol s a nd De v ic es; Re v is io n 5 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 200; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s;Re v is io n 2 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 300; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s and E mergency B reath in g Ai r; R ev is io n 4 M i n e S a fe t y A p p l i a n c e C e r t i fi c a t e s f o r S e l e c t M e m b e r s o f t h e R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n S t a ff;Feb ruary 20 06 Se ction 4OA 1: Pe rforman ce Indic ator V erifica tion (711 51)CA RD 07-206 58; Temperatu re In crea se in the D W E quip ment Su mp; d ated 02/03/2 007 CA RD 07-206 59; DW E quip ment Su mp Tempera ture Indi cati ng Hi gher Than E x pec ted in the M CR; da ted 02/0 3/20 07 9
Motor Control CenterMOV
A tt a ch me n t CA RD 07-206 62; Su spe ct V al v e N ot F ul ly C lo si ng on D eman d from Re ci rcul ati on;date d 0 2/04/200 7 CA RD 07-207 08; G1154-F01 8, D W E quip D rn S ump Inbd C ntm Iso V lv , Thermal Ov erl oad Trip;date d 0 2/06/200 7 Drawing 6I7 21-2 251-3; R/W Sy s-Dr yw ell Eq uipme nt Dra in Sump 71 Pump G I101-C006 A;Re v is io n N , da ted 09/2 3/92 Dra w in g 6I72 1-22 51-4 0; R/W S y s D ry w el l Equi p D rai n S ump Re ci rc & D is ch Va lv es G1154 F01 5 and F 018; R ev is io n Y , da ted 03/0 3/03 D ra w i n g 6 I7 2 1-2 2 5 5-1 0; R a d w a st e S y st e m I n st ru me n t L o o p P a rt 4 Dry w el l Equi pmen t D rai n S ump Temperatu re 0 2/04-19/2 007; R ev is io n V , 05/03/2 006 EP-540; D ril ls an d E x erci ses; R ev is io n 2 6 EP-540 , E ncl osu re E; N RC P erformance Indi cato rs - Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P la n;date d F ebru ary 22 , 20 06 Re cord s o f D EP Ind ic ator Opportu ni tie s; d ated A pri l 200 6 th rough De cembe r 20 06 Re cord s o f K ey E RO D ril l and E x erci se Pa rtic ip ati on; date d A pri l 200 6 th rough De cembe r 20 06 Re cord s o f A NS S ire n Tes t R esu lts; da ted Ap ril 20 06 throu gh De cembe r 20 06 S e c ti o n 4 OA 2: I d e n ti fi c a ti o n a n d R e s o lu ti o n o f P ro b le ms (71 152)CA RD 07-205 10; M ai nten anc e P erformed o n W rong E quip ment; d ated 01/29/2 007 CA RD 07-205 90; Co mmon C aus e A nal y si s o n S el ect CA RD s; d ated 01/13/2 007 CA RD 07-206 95; Su ppl emen tal P erso nne l W orking o n E quip ment W ith out Pro per Pro tecti on Order; d ated 02/05/2 007 CA RD 07-207 81; Un pl ann ed En try i nto TS 3.8.7; d ated 02/08/2 007 CA RD 07-207 85; Va lv es Fou nd Out of Po si tio n D uri ng Pa nel W al kdow n; d ated 02/12/2 007 C A R D 0 7-2 0 8 5 7; P e rfor m a C o mmo n C a u se A n a l y si s o n S ta ti o n "W o rk Q u a l i ty";date d 0 2/13/200 7 CA RD 07-209 27; Fai lu re to P roce ss an LC R f or E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty U pgrade;date d 0 2/16/200 7 CA RD 07-210 69; Co mmuni cati on Up grade No tifica tio n; d ated 02/23/2 007 CARD 07-21083; Lack of Enginee ring Ev aluation Prior to Comm encing M odif ication of the EOD Fac il ity; da ted 02/2 3/20 07 CA RD 07-211 74; P&ID -222 3 C onfigurati on Co ntrol Iss ue; date d 0 2/28/200 7 CA RD 07-211 96; W ork Re quest R el eas ed and W orking W ith out Ad equate Pro tecti on;date d 0 2/28/200 7 CA RD 07-215 19; Ad v erse P erformance Trend Iden tifie d i n M ai nten anc e; d ated 03/15/2 007 C A R D 0 7-2 1 6 5 2; M i ss e d R e p l a ce me n t o f R e l a y , C a u se d P e rfor ma n ce o f S u rv e i l l a n ce Tw o E x tr a Times; date d 0 3/23/200 7 Co mmon C aus e A nal y si s R epo rt for CA RD 07-205 90; date d M arch 28 , 20 07 Fermi 2 Sta tio n Qu arterl y Trend R epo rt, 4 Qua rter (Octo ber thru De cembe r) 20 06 th Lea der Bri ef by K ev in H la v aty; da ted 02/0 7/20 07 Li cen si ng Ch ange Re quest D SN; M LS 080 01; Re f le ct th e c han ge to the Emergenc y Ope rati ons Fac il ity (E OF) F lo or P la n; R ev is io n 9 , da ted 02/2 3/20 07 M EM O NA NT-07, 01/2 2/20 07; De cembe r P erformance Trendi ng Re sul ts; d ated 01/22/2 007 M LS 14; Ch anges, Tests a nd Ex peri ments; Re v is io n 6 M LS A ppe ndi x B; A ppl ic abi li ty D etermi nati on M anu al; R ev is io n 8 M LS 140 02; 50.5 9 S cree n; R ev is io n 5 M LS 140 03; 50.5 9 E v al uati on; Re v is io n 2 R o o t C a u se D e te rmi n a ti o n for C A R D 0 7-2 0 5 1 0; M a i n te n a n ce P e rfor me d o n W ro n g E qui p me n t;date d 0 2/16/200 7 1 0 A tt a ch me n t Se ction 4OA 5: Other A ctiv ities (71 153)CA RD 07-207 33; Fai le d S eal on S outh R W CU R eci rc P ump B; date d 0 2/06/200 7 CA RD 07-211 98; PM T Fai lu re - Ab normal N oi se and S ubs equen t S/D of Sou th R W CU P ump;date d 0 2/28/200 7 Operato r Lo g; 02/06/200 7 to 02/08/2 007 R e v i se d C D F R i sk P ro fil e for t h e W e e k o f 2/2 6 t o 3/5 Ri sk M ana gement P la n; R W CU Le ak Iden tifica tio n, Is ol ati on, and S y stem R esto rati on; date d 02/0 6/20 07 Tro u b l e sh o o ti n g D a ta S h e e t, C A R D 0 7-2 0 7 3 3 , G3 3 0 3 C 0 0 1 B , S o u th R W C U P u mp 1 1 A tt a ch me n tLIST OF A CRONYM S USED AD AM S Agenc y w id e D ocu ments Acc ess an d M ana gement S y stem AN S Al ert a nd No tifica tio n S y stem AR M Are a R adi ati on M oni tor CA RD Co ndi tio n A sse ssmen t R eso lu tio n D ocu ment CF R Co de of Fed eral R egul ati ons CS T Co nde nsa te S torage Tank D R P D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s D R S D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r S a fety EC OS Emergenc y C al l Out S y stem ED G Emergenc y D ie sel Gen erato r E OF E me rge n cy Op e ra ti o n s F a ci l i ty A E OF A l te rn a te E me rge n cy Op e ra ti o n s F a ci l i ty EP Emergenc y P repa redn ess ER O Emergenc y R esp ons e Organi z ati on HP CI Hi gh Pre ssu re C ool ant Injecti on HV AC He ati ng, Ve nti la tio n, a nd Ai r C ond iti oni ng IM C Insp ecti on M anu al C hap ter L E R L i ce n se e E v e n t R e p o rt M CC M otor Co ntrol C ente r MOV Mot or O pe r at ed Val ve N O S N u c l e a r O v e r s i g h t S t a ff NC V No n C ite d V io la tio n NR C Nu cl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on NR R Of f ic e o f N ucl ear Re acto r R egul ati on P A R S P u b l i c A v a i l a b i l i ty R e co rd PI Pe rf ormanc e In di cato r PM T Po st-M ai nten anc e Tes tin g RC IC Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g RC S Re acto r C ool ant Sy stem RE RP Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P repa redn ess RH R Re si dua l He at R emov al R IS R e gul a to ry I n form a ti o n S u mma ry ROC Re gion al Ope rati ons C ente r RP Ra di ati on Pro tecti on RW CU Re acto r W ater Cl ean up SA M Smal l Arti cl es M oni tor SD P Si gnifica nce D etermi nati on Pro ces s TM I Three M il e Is la nd TS Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns U F S A R U p d a te d F i n a l S a fety A n a l y si s R e p o rt UR I Un reso lv ed Item W R W ork Re quest
Motor Operated ValveNOS
Nuclear Oversight Staff  NCV
Non Cited ViolationNRC
Nuclear Regulatory CommissionNRR
Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationPARS
Public Availability RecordPI
Performance IndicatorPMT
Post-Maintenance TestingRCIC
Reactor Core Isolation CoolingRCS
Reactor Coolant SystemRERP
Radiological Emergency Response PreparednessRHR
Residual Heat RemovalRIS
Regulatory Information SummaryROC
Regional Operations CenterRP
Radiation ProtectionRWCU
Reactor Water Cleanup SAM
Small Articles MonitorSDP
Significance Determination ProcessTMI
Three Mile IslandTS
Technical SpecificationsUFSAR
Updated Final Safety Analysis ReportURI
Unresolved ItemWR
Work Request
}}
}}

Revision as of 00:17, 24 October 2018

IR 05000341-07-002, on 01/01/2007-03/31/2007, Fermi Power Plant, Unit 2, Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness
ML071270132
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/2007
From: Lipa C A
NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB4
To: Jennifer Davis
Detroit Edison
References
IR-07-002
Download: ML071270132 (40)
v • d • e


Text

M ay 4, 200 7 M r. Ja ck Da v is , S eni or V ic e P resi den t and C hi ef Nuc le ar Off ic er De troi t E di son C ompa ny F e rmi 2 - 2 1 0 N OC 640 0 N orth Di x ie H ighw ay Ne w port, M I 4 816 6

SUBJECT:

FERM I PO W ER PLANT, UNIT 2, NRC INTEG RAT ED INS PE CTION R EP ORT 05 000 341/200 700 2 De ar M r. D av is: On M arch 31 , 20 07, the U.S. N ucl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on (NR C) compl eted an i ntegrated in spe cti on at y our Fermi P ow er P la nt, U ni t The enc lo sed rep ort d ocu ments the in spe cti on fi n d i n g s w h i c h w e r e d i s c u s s e d o n A p r i l 5 , 2 0 0 7 , w i t h y o u a n d o t h e r m e m b e r s o f y o u r s t a ff.The i n sp e ct i o n e x a mi n e d a ct i v i ti e s co n d u ct e d u n d e r y o u r l i ce n se a s th e y r e l a te t o s a fety a n d t o co mp l i a n ce w i th t h e C o mmi ss i o n's ru l e s a n d r e gul a ti o n s a n d w i th t h e c o n d i ti o n s o f y o u r l i ce n se. The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sel ecte d p roce dure s a nd reco rds, obs erv ed acti v iti es, and i nterv ie w ed pers onnel.B a se d o n t h e r e su l ts o f th i s i n sp e ct i o n , tw o fi n d i n gs o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce w e re identif ied one of w hich inv olv ed a v iolation of NRC req uirem ent How ever, becau se this f in di ng w as of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d b eca use the i ssu e w as ente red in to y our corre cti v e p rogram, the N RC i s tre ati ng the find in g as a N on-C ite d V io la tio n i n a cco rdan ce w i th S e ct i o n V I.A.1 o f th e N R C's E n forc e me n t P o l i c I f y o u c o n te st t h e s u b je ct o r se v e ri ty of a Non-Cited Violation, you should provi de a respons e w ithin 30 day s of the date of this in spe cti on repo rt, w ith the ba si s for y our den ia l, to th e U.S. Nu cl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on, ATTN: D ocu ment Co ntrol D esk, W ash in gton, D C 205 55-0 001 , w ith a cop y to the Re gion al Ad min is trator, U.S. N ucl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on - R egio n III, 244 3 W arren v il le R oad , S u i te 2 1 0 , L i sl e , IL 6 0 5 3 2-4 3 5 2; th e D i re ct o r, Offic e o f E n forc e me n t, U.S. N u cl e a r R e gul a to ry Co mmissi on, W ash in gton, D C 205 55-0 001; an d th e R esi den t Ins pec tor Off ic e a t the Ferm i 2 f ac ilit J. D av is

-2-In a cco rdan ce w ith 10 C FR 2.3 90 of the NR C's "R ul es of Prac tic e," a co py of thi s l etter and its enclosur e w ill be made avail able electr onically f or public inspect ion in the NRC Pu bl ic D ocu ment Ro om o r from the Pu bl ic ly A v ai la bl e R eco rds (PA RS) co mpon ent of NR C's d ocu ment sy stem (A DA M S). A DA M S is ac ces si bl e from the N RC W eb si te a th tt p://w w w.n rc.go v/r e a d i n g-rm/a d a ms.h tml (th e P u b l i c E l e ct ro n i c R e a d i n g R o o m).

Sin ce r ely,/R A/

Ch ris tin e A. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s Do cket No. 50-341 Li cen se No. N PF-43 En cl osu re:

Insp ecti on Re port 050 003 41/2 007 002 w/Attac hmen t: S upp le mental Informati on cc w/enc l:

K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Pe ttin ari , Le gal De partmen t M i ch i gan D e p a rt me n t o f E n v i ro n me n ta l Qu a l i ty W aste an d H az ardo us M ateri al s D iv is io n M. Y u d a sz , Jr., D i re ct o r, M o n ro e C o u n ty Emergenc y M ana gement D iv is io n S u p e rv i so r - E l e ct ri c Op e ra to rs Sta te L ia is on Of f ic er, S tate of M ic hi gan W ay ne Co unty E mergency M ana gement D iv is io n J. D av is

-2-In a cco rdan ce w ith 10 C FR 2.3 90 of the NR C's "R ul es of Prac tic e," a co py of thi s l etter and its enclosur e w ill be made avail able electr onically f or public inspect ion in the NRC Pu bl ic D ocu ment Ro om o r from the Pu bl ic ly A v ai la bl e R eco rds (PA RS) co mpon ent of NR C's d ocu ment sy stem (A DA M S). A DA M S is ac ces si bl e from the N RC W eb si te a th tt p://w w w.n rc.go v/r e a d i n g-rm/a d a ms.h tml (th e P u b l i c E l e ct ro n i c R e a d i n g R o o m).

Sin ce r ely, Ch ris tin e A. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s Do cket No. 50-341 Li cen se No. N PF-43 En cl osu re:

Insp ecti on Re port 050 003 41/2 007 002 w/Attac hmen t: S upp le mental Informati on cc w/enc l:

K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Pe ttin ari , Le gal De partmen t M i ch i gan D e p a rt me n t o f E n v i ro n me n ta l Qu a l i ty W aste an d H az ardo us M ateri al s D iv is io n M. Y u d a sz , Jr., D i re ct o r, M o n ro e C o u n ty Emergenc y M ana gement D iv is io n S u p e rv i so r - E l e ct ri c Op e ra to rs Sta te L ia is on Of f ic er, S tate of M ic hi gan W ay ne Co unty E mergency M ana gement D iv is io n DOCU M EN T NA M E: C:\M y Fi le s\Co pi es\F ER 20 07 002.w pdG P ublicl y A v ailab le G N on-Pub licly A v ailab le G Se ns i ti ve G Non-S en s i ti ve T o r ece iv e a copy of th is docu m en t, in dica te in th e c on cu r r en ce box "C" = C opy wi th ou t a ttac h/en cl "E" = C opy wi th at tach/en cl "N" = N o cop y OF F IC E R II I R II I NA M E RL erch:dtp CL ip a DA TE 05/0 4/07 05/0 4/07OF FICI AL RECORD COPY Lette r to Jac k Dav is from Chri sti ne A. Li pa date d

SUBJECT:

FERM I PO W ER PLANT, UNIT 2, NRC INTEG RAT ED INS PE CTION R EP ORT 05 000 341/200 700 2 DIST RIBUT IO N: T EB LX R1 A X M8 RidsNrr DirsI rib GEG K GO GLS R MM3 CAA1 LS L (ele ct r on ic IR's onl y)C. Ped er so n, DRS (h ar d c op y - I R's onl y)D R P II I D R S II I PLB1 TXN RO Pr ep or t s@nr c.g ov (i n sp e ct i o n r e p o rt s, fi n a l S D P l e tt e rs , a n y l e tt e r w i th a n I R n u mb e r)

E n cl o su reU. S. N U C L E A R R E GU L A TOR Y C OM M IS S IONR E GION I II Do cket No:

50-3 41 Li cen se No:

NP F-43 Re port No:

050 003 41/2 007 002 Li cen see:

De troi t E di son C ompa ny F a ci l i ty:

F e rmi P o w e r P l a n t, U n i t 2 Loc ati on:

Ne w port, M ic hi gan Da tes:

Jan uary 1 throu gh M arch 31 , 20 07 Insp ecto rs:

R. M ic hae l M orri s, S eni or R esi den t Ins pec tor T. Stea dha m, Re si den t Ins pec tor R. Ji ckli ng, Se ni or E mergency P repa redn ess A nal y st D. Jon es, Re acto r Ins pec tor B. Jos e, R eac tor E ngin eer M. P hal en, He al th P hy si ci st A. W il son , R eac tor In spe ctor Ap prov ed by:

C. Li pa, Ch ie f Bra nch 4 D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s 2

En cl osu reS U MMA R Y OF F IN D IN GS IR 050 003 41/2 007 002; 01/01/2 007-03/3 1/20 07; Fermi P ow er P la nt, U ni t 2; Ra di ati on Pro tecti on and E mergency P repa redn ess.This rep ort c ov ers a th ree-mon th p eri od of in spe cti on by res id ent in spe ctors and an nou nce d bas el in e i nsp ecti ons by regi ona l-b ase d e mergency pre pare dne ss and rad ia tio n p rotec tio n in spe ctor Tw o Gre en f in di ngs, on e o f w hi ch w as ass oci ated w ith a No n-C ite d V io la tio n, w ere id enti f ie The s igni f ic anc e o f most f in di ngs i s i ndi cate d b y the ir col or (Gree n, W hi te, Ye ll ow , R ed) usi ng Insp ecti on M anu al C hap ter (IM C) 060 9, "S igni f ic anc e D etermi nati on Pro ces s (S DP)." F in di ngs for w hi ch the SD P doe s n ot a ppl y may be "Green" or be ass igne d a s e v e r i t y l e v e l a ft e r N R C m a n a g e m e n t r e v i e T h e N R C's p r o g r a m f o r o v e r s e e i n g t h e s a fe ope rati on of commerci al nu cl ear pow er re acto rs i s d esc rib ed in N UR EG-16 49, "Re acto r Ov ersi ght Pro ces s," R ev is io n 4 , da ted De cembe r 20 06.A.

NR C-Id entifie d and S elf-Re v eale d Find ings Co rne rsto ne: E merge ncy P rep are dne ss*

Gre e Th e i n sp e ct o rs i d e n ti fie d a fi n d i n g a ss o ci a te d w i th t h e fai l u re t o v e ri fy a d e qua te compe nsa tory mea sure s w ere in pl ace w hi le the E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty (E OF)w as una v ai la bl The l ic ens ee remov ed the EOF f rom se rv ic e for re mode li ng an d pl ann ed to u se thei r A lte rnate E OF (A EOF) f or e mergency res pon se if requi red as a compe nsa tory ac tio Ho w ev er, l ocks p la ced on the do ors to th e A EOF and the l ack of con tin uou s s taff in g of the facil ity co ul d h av e d el ay ed acti v ati on of the f aci li t A f ter th e is sue w as id enti f ie d b y the i nsp ecto r, the l ic ens ee took pro mpt i nteri m corre cti v e a cti ons a n d e n te re d t h e i ss u e i n to t h e i r co rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m.This find in g w as dete rmin ed to b e mo re th an min or b eca use i t w as si mil ar to an ex ampl e i n IM C 061 2, A ppe ndi x E , i n th at th e A EOF and the pro ced ures for acti v ati ng the AE OF w ere in a con di tio n th at c oul d h av e d el ay ed the li cen see's re spo nse to an e me rge n c Th e fi n d i n g w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce b e ca u se a d e qua te compe nsa tory mea sure s w ere put in pl ace w ith in se v en day (Se cti on 4OA3)C o r n e r s t o n e: O c c u p a t i o n a l R a d i a t i o n S a f e t y *

Gree The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d a n assoc iated Non-

Cited Violation (NCV) of NRC req uirem ents f or th e f ailure to m aintain ade quate proc edu res f or th e c al ib rati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge are a ra di ati on mo nitor s (D11-K816 A and B). Specif ically , the li cense e had revised i ts pr ocedur es in 200 1 to remo v e th e re quire ment to c al ib rate the dete ctors w ith a radi oac tiv e s ourc e o f know n a cti v it C ons equen tly , the mon ito r ha d n ot b een ad equatel y ca li brate d s in ce Ap ril 20 0 F ol lo w in g that id enti f ic ati on, the li cen see pe rf ormed an ev al uati on and dete rmin ed that the moni tor w as f unc tio nal ba sed on i ts a dequa te re spo nse to ambi ent ra d i a ti o n l e v e l En cl osu reThe find in g w as more than mi nor bec aus e i t w as ass oci ated w ith the Occu pati ona l Ra di ati on Sa f ety co rners tone attri bute of Pl ant Fac il iti es/E quip ment and Ins trumenta tio n a n d a ff e ct e d t h e c o rn e rs to n e o b je ct i v e o f en su ri n g a d e qua te p ro te ct i o n o f w o rke r h e a l th and sa f ety from ex pos ure to ra di ati on f rom ra di oac tiv e ma teri al s d uri ng ci v il ia n n ucl ear re a ct o r o p e ra ti o S i n ce t h e fi n d i n g i n v o l v e d a re a r a d i a ti o n mo n i to rs , th e i n sp e ct o rs u ti l i z e d I n sp e ct i o n M a n u a l C h a p te r 0 6 0 9 , A p p e n d i x C , "Oc cu p a ti o n a l R a d i a ti o n S a fety SD P," to a sse ss its si gnifica nc Gi v en that in strumen t functi ona l resp ons e w as dete rmin ed throu gh el ectro ni c c al ib rati on and a qual ita tiv e re spo nse to radi ati on, and si n ce t h e i ss u e d i d n o t i n v o l v e a s-l o w-a s-i s-re a so n a b l y-a ch i e v a b l e p l a n n i n g o r w o rk con trol s, th ere w as no ov erex pos ure or s ubs tanti al po tenti al for an ov erex pos ure to th e w o rke r, n o r w a s th e l i ce n se e's a b i l i ty t o a ss e ss d o se c o mp ro mi se d; th e i n sp e ct o rs con cl ude d th at th e S DP as ses sment f or th e fin di ng w as of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce (Gr e e n). T he licensee's planned corr ect iv e actions included re vi sing the applicable proc edu res to p erform a full de tecto r ca li brati on uti li z in g a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n a nd in cl udi ng spe ci f ic ac cep tanc e c rite ria , an d c la rify in g Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns and the bas es. (Se cti on 2OS3.3)B.

Lice nse e-Ide ntified V iolatio nsNo ne 4

En cl osu reRE PORT D ET A ILSSu mmary o f P lant Sta tusOn J a n u a ry 6 , 2 0 0 7 , U n i t 2 r e d u ce d p o w e r to 6 8 p e rc e n t to p e rfor m a r o d p a tt e rn adju stment and retu rned to f ul l pow er o n J anu ary 7, 200 Un it 2 o pera ted at o r nea r full po w er th rougho ut th e re mai nde r of the i nsp ecti on peri od.1.

RE A CTO R SA FE TYC o rn e rs to n e: I n it ia ti n g E v e n ts , B a rr ie r In te g ri ty , Mit ig a ti n g S y s te ms , and Emer gen cy P rep are dne ss 1R 01 Ad v erse W eath er (7 111 1.01) Insp ecti on Sco pe The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see pro ced ures for miti gatin g the eff ects of col d w eath er and hi gh w in ds in the res id ual he at re mov al (R HR) co mpl ex an d o utsi de doo r The in spe ctors performed w al kdow ns and rev ie w ed sev ere w eath er p roce dure s, e mergency pl an imp le menti ng pro ced ures rel ated to sev ere w eath er, a nd ann unc ia tor re spo nse proc edu re A ddi tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed con di tio n a sse ssmen t res ol uti on d o cu me n ts (C A R D s) a n d v e ri fie d p ro b l e ms a ss o ci a te d w i th a d v e rs e w e a th e r w e re ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e ch a ra ct e ri z a ti o These acti v iti es compl eted on e c ol d w eath er s y stems in spe cti on sampl F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 04 Equi pmen t A li gnments (711 11.0 4).1 P a rt i a l S y st e m W a l kdo w n (7 1 1 1 1.0 4 Q) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs p erformed p arti al sy stem w al kdow ns of the f ol lo w in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy stems:*

Torus H arde ned V ent performed the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*

Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g (RC IC) Sy stem p erformed th e w eek of M arch 18 , 20 07; and *

D i v i s i o n I I R H R/R e s i d u a l H e a t R e mo v a l S e r v i c e W a t e r p e r fo r me d t h e w e e ks of M arch 11 an d M arch 18 , 20 0 En cl osu reThe i nsp ecto rs s el ecte d th ese sy stems bas ed on thei r ri sk si gnifica nce rel ati v e to the reac tor s afety co rners tone The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed ope rati ng pro ced ures , sy stem di agrams, Tech ni cal S pec ifica tio n (TS) requi rements , A dmi ni strati v e TS, and the i mpact o f o n g o i n g w o r k a c t i v i t i e s o n r e d u n d a n t t r a i n s o f e q u i p m e n t i n o r d e r t o i d e n t i fy con di tio ns that cou ld ha v e re nde red the sy stems in cap abl e o f pe rf ormi ng the ir in tend ed fu n c t i o n T h e i n s p e c t o r s a l s o w a l ke d d o w n a c c e s s i b l e p o r t i o n s o f t h e s y s t e m s t o v e r i fy sys t em co m po ne nt s wer e al ig ne d c or r ec t ly.In a ddi tio n, th e i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d e quip ment al ignmen t pro bl ems w ere ente red in to th e corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e qua rterl y pa rtia l sy stem w al kdow n i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Com plete System W alk down (711 11.0 4S) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs p erformed a co mpl ete sy stem w al kdow n o f the foll ow in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy st e m:*

Co re S pray S y stem p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 14 , 20 07.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed ope rati ng pro ced ures , sy stem d ia grams, TS requi rements , an d app li cab le se cti ons of the U pda ted Fi nal S afety A nal y si s R epo rt (U FS AR) to ens ure the corre ct s y stem l in eu The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d a cce ptab le mate ria l con di tio n o f sy stem co mp o n e n ts , a v a i l a b i l i ty o f el e ct ri ca l p o w e r to s y st e m c o mp o n e n ts , a n d t h a t a n ci l l a ry equi pmen t or deb ris di d n ot i nterfere w ith sy stem p erformanc The in spe ctors w al ked dow n a cce ssi bl e p orti ons of the sy stem to v eri f y sy stem c ompo nen ts w ere al igne d co r r ec t ly.These acti v iti es compl eted on e s emi-ann ual co mpl ete sy stem w al kdow n i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 05 Fi re P rotec tio n (7 111 1.05).1 R o u ti n e R e si d e n t In sp e ct o r Tou rs (7 1 1 1 1.0 5 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d fire pro tecti on tours of the foll ow in g ris k-signi f ic ant pl ant area s:

6 En cl osu re*

Div ision II Cont rol Comp lex Heating , Vent ilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)Ro om p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 7, 200 7;*

Sta ndb y Li quid C ontro l Pu mp A rea performed the w eek of Jan uary 14 , 20 07;*

Torus R oom Ba semen t pe rf ormed the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*

Di v is io n I Sw itc hgear Ro om p erformed th e w eek of Jan uary 28 , 20 07;*

Re acto r B ui ld in g Comp one nt C ool in g W ater He at E x cha nger R oom performed the w eek of M arch 25 , 20 07; and*

Co ntrol R oom performed the w eek of M arch 24 , 20 07.The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d fire z one co ndi tio ns w ere con si sten t w ith as sumpti ons i n th e li cen see's F ire H az ards A nal y si The i nsp ecto rs w al ked do w n fire de tecti on and su p p re ss i o n e qui p me n t, a ss e ss e d t h e ma te ri a l c o n d i ti o n o f fir e fi ght i n g e qui p me n t, a n d e v a l u a te d t h e c o n tr o l o f tra n si e n t co mb u st i b l e ma te ri a l In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v eri f ie d fire pro tecti on rel ated pro bl ems w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted si x quarte rly fire prote cti on - tou r i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d 1R 06 Fl ood P rotec tio n (7 111 1.06) a.

Insp ecti on Sco pe The i n sp e ct o rs p e rfor me d a n i n sp e ct i o n r e l a te d t o t h e l i ce n se e's p re ca u ti o n s to mi ti gat e the ris k f rom i ntern al floo di ng ev ent The i nsp ecto rs p erformed a w al kdow n o f the f ol lo w in g pl ant area to ass ess the ad equacy of w aterti ght do ors and v eri f y dra in s a nd sumps w ere cl ear of deb ris an d w ere ope rabl e:*

F l o o d D o o r s a n d B a r r i e r s I n s i d e P o w e r B l o c k.The i n sp e ct o rs a l so r e v i e w e d t h e w o rk a ct i v i ti e s a ss o ci a te d w i th i n te rn a l fl o o d i n g to v e ri fy i d e n ti fie d p ro b l e ms w e re b e i n g e n te re d i n to t h e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m w i th the app ropri ate cha racte riz ati on and si gnifica nce.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i ntern al f lo od prote cti on in spe cti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R07 Heat Sink Perf orm ance (7 1111.07A) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d c o mp l e te d t e st r e p o rt s for e me rge n cy d i e se l ge n e ra to rs (ED Gs) 11 , 12 , 13 , an d 1 4 ja cket co ol ant sy stems, lu be oi l, and ai r co ol ant sy stem h eat 7

En cl osu re ex cha nger The i nsp ecto rs s el ecte d th ese he at e x cha ngers b eca use the ir ass oci ated sy st e ms w e re r i sk si gni fic a n t i n t h e l i ce n se e's ri sk a ss e ss me n t a n d w e re r e qui re d t o sup port the ope rabi li ty of oth er ri sk-signi f ic ant, safety-rel ated equi pmen D uri ng the se in spe cti ons , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed app li cab le do cumen ts a nd proc edu re In add iti on, the in spe ctors v eri f ie d h eat si nk prob le ms w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on pr og r am w it h t he app r op r iat e s ig nif ic an ce ch ar ac t er izat ion and co m ple t ed co r r ec t ive a ct i o n s w e re a d e qua te a n d a p p ro p ri a te l y i mp l e me n te These acti v iti es compl eted on e h eat si nk performance i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 1 L i ce n se d Op e ra to r R e qua l i fic a ti o n (7 1 1 1 1.1 1 Q) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peOn F ebru ary 8, 200 7, th e i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed an ope rati ons su ppo rt cre w du rin g the annual req ualif ication examinat ion in mit iga ting the conseq uences of ev ents in Scenar io SS-OP-90 4-10 12, "Dry w el l Pre ssu re In st. F ai ls/RR P ump Fai ls/Smal l LOCA/Pa rtia l Fai lu re o f E CC S on the si mul ator." The in spe ctors ev al uate d th e fol lo w in g area s:*

li cen sed op erato r pe rf ormanc e;*

crew's cl ari ty an d formal ity of commun ic ati ons;*

abi li ty to take ti mel y ac tio ns in the co nse rv ati v e d ire cti on;*

pri ori tiz ati on, in terpre tati on, and v eri f ic ati on of ann unc ia tor a la rms;*

corre ct u se and i mpl emen tati on of abn ormal an d e mergency pro ced ures;*

con trol bo ard mani pul ati ons;*

ov ersi ght an d d ire cti on f rom su perv is ors; and*

abi li ty to id enti f y an d i mpl emen t ap prop ria te TS acti ons an d E mergency P la n acti ons an d n oti f ic ati ons.The c rew's pe rf ormanc e i n th ese are as w as compa red to p re-es tabl is hed op erato r a ct i o n e x p e ct a ti o n s a n d s u cc e ss ful c ri ti ca l t a sk co mp l e ti o n r e qui re me n t These acti v iti es compl eted on e qua rterl y l ic ens ed ope rator requal ifica tio n i nsp ecti on sampl F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 2 M a i n te n a n ce E ff e ct i v e n e ss (7 1 1 1 1.1 2 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs e v al uate d d egrade d p erformance is sue s i nv ol v in g the f ol lo w in g ris k-signi f ic ant sy stems:

8 En cl osu re*

Torus H arde ned V ent; and*

Re acto r W ater Cl ean up (RW CU) 'B' P ump Se al F ai lu re.T he ins pe ct or s a ss es se d pe r f or m an ce iss ue s wit h r es pe ct to th e r eli ab ilit y, a vaila bil it y, and condition m onitor ing of the syste Specif ically , the inspector s independent ly v e ri fie d t h e l i ce n se e's a ct i o n s to a d d re ss s y st e m p e rfor ma n ce o r co n d i ti o n p ro b l e ms i n t e r ms o f t h e fo l l o w i n g:*

imp le menti ng ap prop ria te w ork prac tic es;*

id enti f y in g and ad dres si ng common ca use fail ures;*

sc o p i n g o f sy st e ms i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th 1 0 C F R 5 0.6 5 (b);*

cha racte riz in g sy stem re li abi li ty i ssu es;*

t r ac k ing syst em una vaila bil it y;*

tr e n d i n g ke y p a ra me te rs (co n d i ti o n mo n i to ri n g);*

ens uri ng 10 C FR 50.65(a)(1) o r (a)(2) cl ass ifica tio n a nd/o r re-c la ssi f ic ati on; and*

v eri f y in g app ropri ate performance cri teri a for sy stems cl ass ifie d a s (a)(2) a nd/o r app ropri ate and ad equate goal s a nd corre cti v e a cti ons for sy stems cl ass ifie d a s (a)(1).In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d ma i n te n a n ce e ff e ct i v e n e ss i ss u e s w e re e n te re d i n to the corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted tw o qua rterl y mai nten anc e e f f ecti v ene ss in spe cti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1 R 1 3 M a i n te n a n ce R i sk A ss e ss me n ts a n d E me rge n t W o rk C o n tr o l (7 1 1 1 1.1 3 Q) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the li cen see's e v al uati on and man agement of pl ant ris k f or the mai nten anc e a nd ope rati ona l acti v iti es aff ecti ng ri sk-signi f ic ant and sa f ety-rel ated e q u ip m e n t li s t e d be lo w:*

Di v is io n I RH R Sa f ety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of Jan uary 21 , 20 07;*

ED G 12 S afety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of Fe brua ry 4, 200 7;*

72E C-2 C M otor Co ntrol C ente r (M CC) C ontro l Transformer W ork duri ng the w eek of Fe brua ry 4, 200 7;*

Com bust ion Tur bine Gener ator 11-1 tr ip, rem oval of the Nort h Heater Drain Pu mp, a nd ED G 11 fail ure f rom se rv ic e d uri ng the w eek of Fe brua ry 18 , 20 07;and *

RC IC Sa f ety S y stem Outa ge du rin g the w eek of M arch 4, 200 7.These acti v iti es w ere sel ecte d b ase d o n th ei r po tenti al ri sk si gnifica nce rel ati v e to the reac tor s afety co rners tone As app li cab le for ea ch acti v ity , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the sc o p e o f ma i n te n a n ce w o rk, d i sc u ss e d t h e r e su l ts o f th e a ss e ss me n t w i th t h e l i ce n se e's p ro b a b i l i st i c ri sk a n a l y st a n d/o r sh i ft te ch n i ca l a d v i so r, a n d v e ri fie d p l a n t co n d i ti o n s w e re 9

En cl osu re con si sten t w ith the ri sk asse ssmen The i nsp ecto rs a ls o re v ie w ed TS requi rements an d w al ked do w n p orti ons of red und ant safety sy stems, w hen ap pl ic abl e, to v eri f y ri sk a n a l y si s a ss u mp ti o n s w e re v a l i d a n d a p p l i ca b l e r e qui re me n ts w e re me t.The se a ct i v i ti e s co mp l e te d fi v e qu a rt e rl y ma i n te n a n ce r i sk a ss e ss me n t a n d e me rge n t w ork con trol i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 15 Operab il ity E v al uati ons (71 111.15) Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the f ol lo w in g CA RD s to en sure ei ther the con di tio n d id no t rend er th e i nv ol v ed equi pmen t i nop erab le or resu lt in an un reco gniz ed in crea se in pl ant ris k, and the li cen see ap prop ria tel y ap pl ie d TS li mita tio ns and ap prop ria tel y retu rned the aff ecte d e quip ment to a n o pera bl e s tatus:*

C A R D 0 6-2 7 7 9 4 , M i s-to rqu e d H i gh P re ss u re C o o l a n t In je ct i o n (H P C I)The rmo co u p l e Ga ske t;*

CA RD 06-28 12 4, Loo se Fle xible Con du it and Ju nc t ion Box;*

C A R D 0 6-2 7 6 6 4 , A u to ma ti c V o l ta ge R e gul a to r Ge n e ra l A l a rm; *

CA RD 07-206 58, Dry w el l Equi pmen t D rai n S ump; and *

CA RD 07-215 38, ED G Oil Le aks.These acti v iti es compl eted fiv e o pera bi li ty ev al uati ons i nsp ecti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R17 Perm anent Plant M odif ications (71111.17A) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe fol l o w i n g e n gi n e e ri n g d e si gn p a cka ge w a s re v i e w e d a n d s e l e ct e d a sp e ct s w e re d i sc u ss e d w i th e n gi n e e ri n g p e rs o n n e l: *

W o rk R e que st (W R) 0 0 0 Z 0 5 2 9 0 0 , R H R P u mp 'A' M o to r R e p l a ce me n t.Thi s d o cu me n t a n d r e l a te d d o cu me n ta ti o n w e re r e v i e w e d for a d e qua cy o f th e s a fety ev al uati on, con si dera tio n o f de si gn pa rameters , i mpl emen tati on of the modi f ic ati on, p o st-mo d i fic a ti o n t e st i n g, a n d r e l e v a n t p ro ce d u re s, d e si gn, a n d l i ce n si n g d o cu me n ts w ere prop erl y up date The mod ifica tio n w as f or e quip ment upgrad es of ex is tin g e qui p me n En cl osu reThese acti v iti es compl eted on e p ermane nt p la nt mo di f ic ati on in spe cti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 19 Po st-M ai nten anc e Tes tin g (711 11.1 9) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed pos t-main tena nce tes tin g (PM T) acti v iti es ass oci ated w ith the f ol lo w in g sche dul ed mai nten anc e:*

W R 000Z0600002 , Cont rol Room Annunciator Panel 601 and 602 Pow er Supply R e p l a ce me n t;*

7 2 E C-2 C M C C C o n t r o l T r a n s fo r me r W o r k;*

D i v i si o n I C o n tr o l C o mp l e x H V A C E me rge n cy M a keu p F a n; *

ED G 11 Tw enty-Fou r H our Ru n F ol lo w in g M ai nten anc e; a nd*

RC IC Fol lo w in g Val v e a nd Pu mp S eal M ai nten anc e.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the sco pe of the w ork performed and ev al uate d th e a dequa cy of the spe ci f ie d P M The i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d th e P M T w as performed in ac cord anc e w ith ap prov ed proc edu res, the proc edu res cl earl y sta ted acc epta nce cri teri a, a nd the acc epta nce cri teri a w ere met. The in spe ctors in terv ie w ed ope rati ons , mai nten anc e, a nd engi nee rin g dep artment pers onn el an d re v ie w ed the compl eted P M T doc umen tati on.In a ddi tio n, th e i nsp ecto rs v eri f ie d P M T prob le ms w ere ente red in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted fiv e P M T in spe cti on sampl e F i n d i n gs No find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1R 22 Su rv ei ll anc e Tes tin g (711 11.2 2) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the test resu lts for the foll ow in g acti v iti es to d etermi ne w heth er ri sk-si gni fic a n t sy st e ms a n d e qui p me n t w e re c a p a b l e o f pe rfor mi n g th e i r i n te n d e d s a fety f unc tio n a nd to v eri f y tes tin g w as con duc ted in ac cord anc e w ith ap pl ic abl e p roce dura l and TS re quire ments:*

P ro ce d u re 2 4.1 3 9.0 2 , S ta n d b y L i qui d C o n tr o l Op e ra b i l i ty Te st;*

W R W 419 070 100 , C al ib rate ED G 12 S erv ic e W ater Fl ow Lo op;*

W R 0 3 0 4 0 7 0 1 3 1 , P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.3 5 D i e se l Ge n e ra to r S e rv i ce W a te r, D i e se l F u e l Oi l Ta n k, a n d S ta rt i n g A i r Op e ra b i l i ty Te st; 11 En cl osu re*

Pro ced ure 24.0 00.0 2, R eac tor C ool ant Sy stem (R CS) Ope rati ona l Lea kag e; a nd*

P ro ce d u re 2 4.2 0 2.0 1 , H P C I P u mp Ti me R e sp o n se a n d Op e ra b i l i ty Te st.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the test method ol ogy an d te st re sul ts to v eri f y equi pmen t p e rfor ma n ce w a s co n si st e n t w i th s a fety a n a l y si s a n d d e si gn b a si s a ss u mp ti o n In a d d i ti o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d s u rv e i l l a n ce t e st i n g p ro b l e ms w e re b e i n g e n te re d i n to the corre cti v e a cti on program w ith the ap prop ria te s igni f ic anc e c hara cteri z ati on.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e ro uti ne surv ei ll anc es, one R CS l eak sa mpl e, a nd one in-serv ic e te st i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P2 Al ert a nd No tifica tio n S y stem E v al uati on (711 14.0 2) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peT h e i n s p e c t o r s r e v i e w e d a n d d i s c u s s e d w i t h E m e r g e n c y P r e p a r e d n e s s (E P) s t a ff reco rds f or th e o pera tio n, ma in tena nce an d te sti ng of the al ert a nd noti f ic ati on sy stem (AN S) f or th e F ermi 2 Pl ant Emergenc y P la nni ng Zo ne to v eri f y tha t the A NS equi pmen t w a s a d e qua te l y ma i n ta i n e d a n d t e st e d d u ri n g 2 0 0 5 , 2 0 0 6 , a n d 2 0 0 7 i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th emergency pl an commi tments and pro ced ure The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of 200 5 a nd 200 6 p rev enti v e ma in tena nce pe rf ormed on AN S equi pmen t to v eri f y tha t ann ual pre v enti v e ma in tena nce w as compl ete A ls o, th e i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sampl es of 200 5, 2 006 , an d 2 007 no n-sc hed ul ed mai nten anc e a cti v ity rec ords , to dete rmin e w h e th e r e qui p me n t tr o u b l e-s h o o ti n g a n d r e p a i rs w e re c o mp l e te d i n a t i me l y ma n n e r. Ad di tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of AN S tests con duc ted f rom M ay 20 05 throu gh Fe brua ry 20 07, to d etermi ne if Fe rmi EP sta f f w ere eff ecti v el y us in g the corre cti v e a cti on program to do cumen t, co rrect, and tren d i den tifie d s ire n p robl ems.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P3 Emergenc y R esp ons e Organi z ati on Sta f f in g and A ugmentati on Sy stem (7 111 4.03) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d a n d d i sc u ss e d p ro ce d u re s o n t h e p ri ma ry a n d a l te rn a te proc ess es of augmenti ng the on-shi f t eme rgency res pon se organi z ati on (ER O). The inspect ors also di scus sed the EP sta f f's proces s f or m aintaining the Ferm i 2 Plant's ER O roste r an d E RO p erso nne l's c onta ct i nformatio The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of una nno unc ed off-hou rs a ugmentati ons of the on-shi f t E RO, w hi ch in cl ude d c al l-i n te st res ults bet w een June 2005 and Janua ry 2007, to det erm ine the adeq uacy of ERO members' res pon se and the us e o f the co rrecti v e a cti on program for i den tifie d re spo nse 12 En cl osu re p ro b l e m Th e i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d a s a mp l e o f tra i n i n g re co rd s for 4 5 E R O m e mb e rs w ho w ere ass igne d to key an d s upp ort p osi tio ns to v eri f y tha t the y w ere curre ntl y trai ned f or th ei r as si gned pos iti ons.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P5 Co rrecti on of Emergency P repa redn ess W eaknes ses (71 114.05) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed Nu cl ear Ov ersi ght Sta f f's (N OS) 2 005 an d 2 006 au di ts o f the li cen see's E P program to v eri f y tha t the se in dep end ent ass ess ments met the req uirem ents of 10 CFR 50.5 4(t). T he inspect ors revi ew ed sam ple recor ds of EP d ri l l s a n d e x e rc i se s co n d u ct e d d u ri n g 2 0 0 5 a n d 2 0 0 6 t o v e ri fy t h a t th e se a ct i v i ti e s w e re ade quatel y cri tique Sa mpl es of correc tiv e a cti on program re cord s a nd ass oci ated corre cti v e a cti ons w ere rev ie w ed to d etermi ne if w eaknes ses an d d efici enc ie s i den tifie d in the f ollow ing types of self-as sess me nts w ere adeq uate ly addres sed: crit iqu es of EP d r i l l s a n d e x e r c i s e s; N O S 2 0 0 5 a n d 2 0 0 6 s t a t i o n E P a u d i t s; a n d F e r m i P l a n t E P s t a ff 200 6 a nd 200 7 s el f-ass ess ments.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.1E P6 Dri ll E v al uati on (711 14.0 6) a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the li cen see pe rf orm a n E P dri ll on M arch 21 , 20 0 The i n sp e ct o rs o b se rv e d a ct i v i ti e s i n t h e c o n tr o l r o o m s i mu l a to r, t e ch n i ca l s u p p o rt c e n te r, a n d e me rge n cy o p e ra ti o n s fac i l i t Th e i n sp e ct o rs a l so a tt e n d e d t h e p o st-d ri l l fac i l i ty crit iqu es in the techn ical support center and emer g ency operat ions f acility imm ediately f ol lo w in g the dri ll. The f ocu s o f the i nsp ecto rs' ac tiv iti es w as to n ote any w eaknes ses and de f ic ie nci es in the dri ll pe rf ormanc e a nd ens ure the li cen see ev al uato rs n oted the same w eaknes ses an d d efici enc ie s a nd ente red them in to th e c orrec tiv e a cti on progra The i nsp ecto rs p la ced emp has is on ob serv ati ons regard in g ev ent cl ass ifica tio n, n oti f ic ati ons , pro tecti v e a cti on reco mmenda tio ns, and si te e v acu ati on and ac cou ntab il ity ac tiv iti e A s p art o f the i nsp ecti on, the in spe ctors rev ie w ed the d ri l l p a cka ge i n cl u d e d i n t h e l i st o f do cu me n ts r e v i e w e d a t th e e n d o f th i s re p o rt.These acti v iti es compl eted on e d ril l ev al uati on in spe cti on sampl En cl osu re b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.2.

RA DI A TIO N SA FE TYC o rn e rs to n e: Oc c u p a ti o n a l R a d ia ti o n S a fe ty 2OS3 Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Instru mentati on and P rotec tiv e E quip ment (711 21.0 3).1 Insp ecti on Pl ann in g a.

Insp ecti on Sco peT he inspect ors revi ew ed the Fer mi Pow er Plant Unit 2 UFSAR to identif y applicable radi ati on moni tors ass oci ated w ith mea suri ng tran si ent hi gh an d v ery hi gh rad ia tio n area s i ncl udi ng tho se use d i n re mote emergency as ses smen The in spe ctors id enti f ie d t h e t y p e s o f p o r t a b l e r a d i a t i o n d e t e c t i o n i n s t r u me n t a t i o n u s e d fo r j o b c o v e r a ge o f h i gh radi ati on area w ork i ncl udi ng i nstru ments use d for u nde rw ater surv ey s, fix ed area radi ati on moni tors use d to pro v id e ra di ol ogica l in f ormati on in v ari ous pl ant area s, a nd con tin uou s a ir moni tors use d to as ses s a irb orne rad io lo gical co ndi tio ns and w ork area s with th e po t en t ial f or w or k er s t o r ec eive a 50 m illir em or g r ea t er co m m it t ed ef f ec t ive dos e e quiv al en C onta min ati on moni tors, w hol e b ody co unte rs a nd thos e ra di ati on dete cti on in strumen ts u til iz ed f or th e re le ase of pe rson nel , an d e quip ment f rom the radi ol ogica ll y res tric ted area w ere al so id enti f ie d.These acti v iti es compl eted tw o i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 W al kdow ns of Rad ia tio n M oni tori ng Instru mentati on a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d w al kdow ns of sel ecte d a rea radi ati on moni tors (AR M s)in the mai n c ontro l room, tu rbi ne, radi oac tiv e w aste , an d re acto r bu il di ngs to v eri f y the y w ere lo cate d a s d esc rib ed in the U FS AR an d w ere opti mal ly po si tio ned rel ati v e to the pote nti al so urce (s) o f rad ia tio n th ey w ere in tend ed to mo ni tor a nd to v eri f y tha t co ntrol ro o m i n st ru me n t re a d o u t a n d h i gh a l a rm se tp o i n ts for t h o se A R M s w e re c o n si st e n t w i th UF SA R in f ormati on and ac tual fiel d c ond iti on W al kdow ns w ere al so con duc ted of thos e a reas w here po rtabl e s urv ey i nstru ments w ere cal ib rated/repa ire d a nd mai ntai ned f or ra di ati on prote cti on staff us e to de termin e i f tho se in strumen ts d esi gnated "read y for use" w ere suff ic ie nt i n n umbe r to sup port the radi ati on prote cti on program, h ad curre nt ca lib r at ion st ic k er s, w er e op er ab le, and w er e in g oo d ph ysic al c on dit io Ad dit ion all y, the in spe ctors obs erv ed the li cen see's i nstru ment cal ib rati on uni ts a nd the radi ati on sou rces us ed f or i nstru ment che cks to ass ess the ir materi al co ndi tio n a nd di scu sse d 14 En cl osu re thei r us e w ith R P staff to dete rmin e i f the y w ere use d a dequa tel L ic ens ee pers onn el w e re a l so o b se rv e d p e rfor mi n g s o u rc e c h e cks o f se l e ct e d i n st ru me n ts a s th e y w e re l o gged-o u t for u s These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsN o fi n d i n gs o f si gni fic a n ce w e re i d e n ti fie d. .3 Ca li brati on and Testi ng of Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Instru mentati on a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i n sp e ct o rs s e l e ct i v e l y r e v i e w e d r a d i o l o gi ca l i n st ru me n ta ti o n a ss o ci a te d w i th moni tori ng tran si ent hi gh an d/or v ery hi gh rad ia tio n a reas , i nstru ments use d for remote emergency as ses sment and rad ia tio n mo ni tors use d to i den tify pe rson nel co n ta mi n a ti o n a n d for a ss e ss me n t o f i n te rn a l e x p o su re s to v e ri fy t h a t th e i n st ru me n ts h a d b e e n c a l i b ra te d a s re qui re d b y t h e l i ce n se e's p ro ce d u re s, c o n si st e n t w i th i n d u st ry and regul atory sta nda rd The in spe ctors al so rev ie w ed al arm se tpoi nts f or s el ecte d AR M s to v eri f y tha t the y w ere esta bl is hed co nsi sten t w ith the U FS AR an d TSs , as app li cab l S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed cal ib rati on proc edu res and the most re ce n t ca l i b ra ti o n r e co rd s a n d/o r so u rc e c h a ra ct e ri z a ti o n/o u tp u t v e ri fic a ti o n d o cu me n ts f or th e fol lo w in g radi ati on moni tori ng i nstru mentati on and i nstru ment cal ib rati on e qui p me n t:*

C o n ta i n me n t H i gh R a n ge A R M s (b o th d i v i si o n s);*

M a i n C o n tr o l R o o m (C h a n n e l 6);*

Tra v e rs i n g In-C o re P ro b e R o o m A R M (C h a n n e l 1 2);*

R e fue l F l o o r A R M s (C h a n n e l s 1 5 a n d 1 7);*

N e w F u e l S to ra ge V a u l t (C h a n n e l 1 6);*

Smal l Arti cl es M oni tors use d a t pl ant egress poi nts;*

J. L. S h e p h e rd I n st ru me n t C a l i b ra to r;*

Po rtabl e s urv ey i nstru ments use d for u nde rw ater surv ey s;*

S ta n d u p W h o l e B o d y C o u n te r; *

Po rtal M oni tors use d a t the P rima ry A cce ss Po rtal; an d*

Pe rson nel C onta min ati on M oni tors use d a t the egress po in ts.The i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned w hat acti ons w ere taken w hen , an d d uri ng cal ib rati on or sou rce che cks, an i nstru ment w as f oun d s igni f ic antl y ou t of cal ib rati on or e x cee ded as-found ac cep tanc e c rite ri S hou ld tha t oc cur, the in spe ctors v eri f ie d th at th e li cen see's ac tio ns w oul d i ncl ude a dete rmin ati on of the in strumen t's pre v io us usa ges a n d t h e p o ss i b l e c o n se que n ce s o f th a t u se , si n ce t h e p ri o r ca l i b ra ti o Th e i n sp e ct o rs al so rev ie w ed the li cen see's 10 C FR P art 6 1 s ourc e te rm i nformatio n to de termin e i f the ca l i b ra ti o n s o u rc e s u se d w e re r e p re se n ta ti v e o f th e p l a n t so u rc e t e rm a n d t h a t d i ff i cu l t to d e te ct n u cl i d e s w e re s ca l e d i n to w h o l e b o d y c o u n t d o se d e te rmi n a ti o n These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl En cl osu re b.

F i n d i n gsIntrod ucti on: The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce an d a n a ss o ci a te d N o n-C i te d V i o l a ti o n o f N R C r e qui re me n ts for t h e fai l u re t o ma i n ta i n a d e qua te p ro ce d u re s for th e c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s (D 1 1-K 8 1 6 A a n d B). De scri pti on: The con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M s a re u sed to f aci li tate the ev al uati on of core da mage i n th e e v ent of a p ostu la ted acc id ent and are al so use d a s A RM s d uri ng pl ant ope rati ons , sh utdo w n, a nd und er a cci den t co ndi tio n The des ign, use , an d mai nten anc e o f the se moni tors is de scri bed i n th e s tati on UF SA R and the rad io lo gical e me rge n cy r e sp o n se p re p a re d n e ss p l a The i nsp ecto rs i den tifie d th at i n 2 001 the l ic ens ee rev is ed pl ant tech ni cal pro ced ures f or th e c al ib rati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M That re v is io n e li min ated the re qui re me n t th a t th e c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s b e p e rfor me d w i th a tra cea bl e, know n s ourc e o f rad io acti v it S in ce that time , the 18-month cal ib rati on w as redu ced to an el ectro ni c c al ib rati on of the in strumen t w ith on ly a qual ita tiv e v eri f ic ati on of d e te ct o r re sp o n se. The i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the ch ange to th e l ic ens ee's p roce dure res ul ted in an in compl ete cal ib rati on of the in strumen t w hi ch f ai le d to pro v id e a ssu ranc e th at th e in strumen t w oul d a ccu ratel y res pon As f urthe r de scri bed i n N UR EG 0 737 , the ca l i b ra ti o n o f th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s a re t o i n cl u d e a s i n gl e p o i n t i n-s i tu cal ib rati on that ex pos es the dete ctors to a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n i n th e ra nge o f 1 R e m/h r to 1 0 R e m/h r. P ri o r to 1 9 9 9 , th e l i ce n se e's TS s co n ta i n e d a r e qui re me n t to p e rfor m a s i n gl e p o i n t i n-s i tu cal ib rati on and ex pos e th e c onta in ment hi gh ran ge rad ia tio n d etec tors to a know n s ourc e of radi ati on in the ran ge of 1 R em/hr to 10 R em/h Ho w ev er, th e d etai l of thi s c al ib rati on requi rement w as del eted w hen the l ic ens ee trans iti one d to Improv ed Techni cal S p e ci fic a ti o n s i n a cc o rd a n ce w i th l i ce n se a me n d me n t 1 3 4 , d a te d S e p te mb e r 3 0 , 1 9 9 9. Al thou gh, the li cen see i ndi cate d to the i nsp ecto rs th at n o c han ge i n d etec tor c al ib rati on proto col w as in tend ed w ith the i mpl emen tati on of Improv ed Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns, s t a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s 6 2.1 2 0.0 4 0 a n d 6 2.1 2 0.0 4 1 fo r t h e c a l i b r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t a i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s w e re c h a n ged i n 2 0 0 Th a t ch a n ge e l i mi n a te d t h e r e qui re me n t for a qua n ti ta ti v e r a d i a ti o n c h e ck a s a p a rt o f th e i n st ru me n t ca l i b ra ti o n. An al y si s: The fail ure to a dequa tel y mai ntai n p roce dure s for the ca li brati on of the con tai nmen t hi gh ran ge AR M s w as dete rmin ed to b e a pe rf ormanc e d efici enc y as de f in ed i n N R C I n sp e ct i o n M a n u a l C h a p te r (I M C) 0 6 1 2 , "P o w e r R e a ct o r In sp e ct i o n R e p o rt s,"Ap pen di x B , "Issu e S cree ni ng." S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t no t ca li brati ng th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s u si n g ra d i a ti o n s o u rc e s o f kno w n v a l u e s w a s mo re than mi nor bec aus e i t w as ass oci ated w ith the Occu pati ona l Ra di ati on Sa f ety co rners tone attri bute of Pl ant Fac il iti es/E quip ment and Ins trumenta tio n a nd aff ecte d th e c orne rston e o b je ct i v e o f en su ri n g a d e qua te p ro te ct i o n o f w o rke r h e a l th a n d s a fety fro m e x p o su re t o radi ati on f rom ra di oac tiv e ma teri al s d uri ng ci v il ia n n ucl ear reac tor o pera tio Therefore, the is sue w as greater th an min or a nd repre sen ted a fin di ng w hi ch w as ev al uate d u si ng th e S i gni fic a n ce D e te rmi n a ti o n P ro ce ss (S D P).

16 En cl osu reSince the f inding inv olv ed ARM s, t he inspect ors utiliz ed IM C 0609, Appendix C

,"Oc cu p a ti o n a l R a d i a ti o n S a fety S D P ," t o a ss e ss i ts s i gni fic a n c Th e i n sp e ct o rs concluded that the issue did not inv olv e as-low-as-is-

reas onably-achievable pl ann in g or w ork con trol s, th ere w as no ov erex pos ure or s ubs tanti al po tenti al for an ov erex pos ure to th e w orker, an d th e l ic ens ee's a bi li ty to ass ess do se w as not compro mise Co nse quentl y , the i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the S DP as ses sment for th e fi n d i n g w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety s i gni fic a n ce (Gre e n). The i n sp e ct o rs a l so r e v i e w e d t h e i ss u e a n d d e te rmi n e d t h a t n o c ro ss-c u tt i n g a sp e ct s w ere id enti f ie d i n th e a reas of hu man performance , pro bl em i den tifica tio n a nd reso lu tio n, o r sa fety c o n sc i o u s w o rk e n v i ro n me n t. En f orce ment: Techni cal S pec ifica tio n 5.4.1 requi res that w ritte n p roce dure s b e e st a b l i sh e d , i mp l e me n te d , a n d ma i n ta i n e d for a ct i v i ti e s l i st e d i n R e gul a to ry Gui de 1.33 , R ev is io n 2 , A ppe ndi x A , Fe brua ry 19 7 R egul atory Gui de 1.33 de f in es the q uality assur ance pr og ram req uirem ents f or nuclear pow er plant s and Appendix A, Se cti on 7, s tep f. sp eci f ie s p roce dure s for the A RM Co ntrary to the abo v e, th e l ic ens ee d i d n o t ma i n ta i n a d e qua te c a l i b ra ti o n p ro ce d u re s for th e c o n ta i n me n t h i gh ra n ge A R M s. S i n c e 2 0 0 1 , F e r mi S t a t i o n p r o c e d u r e s fo r t h e c a l i b r a t i o n o f t h e c o n t a i n me n t h i gh r a n ge AR M s d id no t i ncl ude a quanti tati v e re spo nse to a know n s ourc e o f rad ia tio n a s a pa rt of th e i n st ru me n t ca l i b ra ti o n w h i ch r e su l te d i n a n i n co mp l e te c a l i b ra ti o n o f th e i n st ru me n t. As an immed ia te c orrec tio n a cti on, the li cen see pe rf ormed an ev al uati on and de termin ed that the moni tor w as f unc tio nal ba sed on i ts a dequa te re spo nse to ambi ent radi ati on le v el The l ic ens ee al so pl ann ed to re v is e a ppl ic abl e p roce dure s to pe rf orm the calibrat ions using appropr iate rad ioactive source Since the li cense e docum ente d this is sue i n i ts c orrec tiv e a cti on program (C AR D 07-2 161 6), a nd bec aus e th is find in g is of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce , i t i s b ei ng trea ted as a N on-C ite d V io la tio n (N C V 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 7 0 0 2-0 1)..4 Pro bl em Id enti f ic ati on and R eso lu tio n a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see co ndi tio n a sse ssmen t res ol uti on doc umen ts (C AR Ds)a n d a n y s p e ci a l r e p o rt s th a t i n v o l v e d p e rs o n n e l c o n ta mi n a ti o n mo n i to r a l a rms d u e t o pers onn el i ntern al ex pos ures to v eri f y tha t i den tifie d p robl ems w ere ente red in to th e corre cti v e a cti on program for res ol uti o Li cen see au di ts a nd CA RD s w ere al so rev ie w ed to v eri f y tha t de f ic ie nci es and pro bl ems w ith rad io lo gical i nstru mentati on, the radi ati on moni tori ng sy stem o r se lf-conta in ed brea thi ng ap para tus (SC BA) w ere id enti f ie d, ch a ra ct e ri z e d , p ri o ri ti z e d , a n d r e so l v e d e ff e ct i v e l y u si n g th e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro gra m.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed corre cti v e a cti on program re ports rel ated to ex pos ure si gnifica nt radi ol ogica l in ci den ts th at i nv ol v ed radi ati on moni tori ng i nstru ment defici enc ie s s in ce the l a st i n sp e ct i o n i n t h i s a re a , a s a p p l i ca b l M e mb e rs o f th e r a d i a ti o n p ro te ct i o n s ta ff w e re in terv ie w ed and co rrecti v e a cti on doc umen ts w ere rev ie w ed to v eri f y tha t foll ow-up a ct i v i ti e s w e re b e i n g c o n d u ct e d i n a n e ff e ct i v e a n d t i me l y ma n n e r co mme n su ra te w i th t h e i r i mp o r t a n c e t o s a fe t y a n d r i s k b a s e d o n t h e fo l l o w i n g:

17 En cl osu re*

I n i t i a l p r o b l e m i d e n t i fi c a t i o n , c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n , a n d t r a c ki n g;*

Di spo si tio n o f op erab il ity/repo rtabi li ty i ssu es;*

Ev al uati on of safety si gnifica nce/ris k and pri ori ty for reso lu tio n;*

Iden tifica tio n o f rep eti tiv e p robl ems;*

Iden tifica tio n o f co ntri buti ng cau ses; an d*

Iden tifica tio n a nd imp le mentati on of ef f ecti v e c orrec tiv e a cti ons.The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d i f th e l i ce n se e's se l f-as se ss me n t a n d/o r a u d i t a ct i v i ti e s w e re identif yi ng and address ing repet itive def iciencies or sig nif icant indivi dual def iciencies in p ro b l e m i d e n ti fic a ti o n a n d r e so l u ti o These rev ie w s re pres ente d th ree in spe cti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..5 Ra di ati on Pro tecti on Techni ci an Instru ment Use a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs s el ecti v el y v eri f ie d th at c al ib rati ons for tho se in strumen ts re cen tly us ed and for tho se des igna ted f or u se had no t l aps e The in spe ctors rev ie w ed in strumen t lo gs to v eri f y tha t res pon se che cks of porta bl e s urv ey i nstru ments w ere compl eted pri or to i nstru ment use an d u pon retu rn o f the i nstru ment to th e s torage area after u se, as requi red by the l ic ens ee's p roce dur The i nsp ecto rs a ls o d is cus sed i nstru ment cal ib rati on method s a nd sou rce resp ons e c hec k practi ces w ith rad ia tio n p rotec tio n st a ff a n d o b se rv e d s ta ff c o mp l e te i n st ru me n t o p e ra b i l i ty c h e cks p ri o r to u s These rev ie w s re pres ente d o ne in spe cti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..6 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s (S CB A) M ai nten anc e/Ins pec tio n a nd Use r Trai ni ng a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed asp ects of the li cen see's res pi ratory pro tecti on program for com pliance w ith the r eq uirem ents of Subpart H of 10 CFR Part 20 and to deter mine if S C B A w a s p ro p e rl y ma i n ta i n e d a n d r e a d y for e me rge n cy u s Th e i n sp e ct o rs rev ie w ed the statu s, mai nten anc e, a nd surv ei ll anc e re cord s o f S CB As staged and read y-f or-em erg ency use i n v arious areas of the plant and asses sed the li cense e's cap abi li ty for refil li ng an d tra nsp orti ng SC BA ai r bo ttle s to an d from the co ntrol roo m a n d o p e ra ti o n s su p p o rt c e n te r (OS C) d u ri n g e me rge n cy c o n d i ti o n The i n sp e ct o rs v e ri fie d t h a t se l e ct e d c o n tr o l r o o m s ta ff d e si gna te d for t h e a ct i v e o n-s h i ft d u ty r o st e r, in cl udi ng tho se in di v id ual s o n th e s tati on's fire bri gade, w ere trai ned , res pi rator f it teste d, and me dically cert if ied to use SCBA Additionally , the inspector s review ed SCBA 18 En cl osu re qual ifica tio ns f or th e e mergency res pon se organi z ati on's ra di ol ogica l emergency tea m to d etermi ne if a suff ic ie nt n umbe r of staff w ere qual ifie d to fulfil l emergency res pon se pos iti ons to meet the requi rements of 10 C FR 50.4 The in spe ctors al so rev ie w ed resp ira tory pro tecti on trai ni ng l ess on pl ans to ass ess the ir ov eral l ade quacy for compl ia nce w ith S ubp art H , an d to v eri f y tha t pe rson al S CB A ai r bo ttle ch ange-o ut w as ade quatel y co v ered.The i nsp ecto rs w al ked do w n th e b ottl ed ai r su ppl y rac k and spa re a ir bottl e s tati ons locate d outside th e main cont rol room and inspected SCBA eq uipme nt m aintained in the con trol roo m an d S CB A equi pmen t sta ged for emergen cy us e i n v ari ous are as of the plan During the w alk downs, the inspect ors ex am ined several SCB A units to asse ss the ir materi al co ndi tio n, to v eri f y tha t ai r bo ttle hy dros tati c te sts w ere curre nt, a nd to v eri f y tha t bottl es w ere pres suri z ed to me et p roce dura l requi rement The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed reco rds of SC BA equi pmen t i nsp ecti on and functi ona l testi ng an d o bse rv ed sel ecte d ope rati ons pe rson nel i nsp ect, don , do f f , an d u se SC BA ai r pa cks to dete rmin e i f the se a ct i v i ti e s w e re p e rfor me d c o n si st e n t w i th p ro ce d u re a n d t h e e qui p me n t ma n u fac tu re rs reco mmenda tio n The in spe ctors al so ens ured tha t the requi red, peri odi c a ir cy li nde r hy dros tati c te sti ng w as doc umen ted and up to date , an d th at th e D epa rtment o f T rans port ation re q uired ret est air cy linder mar k ing s w ere in place f or several rando mly sel ecte d S CB A uni t Ad di tio nal ly , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed v end or tra in in g certi f ic ates for thos e i ndi v id ual s i nv ol v ed in the rep ai r of SC BA pre ssu re re gula tors to d etermi ne if tho se p e rs o n n e l t h a t p e rfor me d ma i n te n a n ce o n c o mp o n e n ts v i ta l t o e qui p me n t fun ct i o n w e re qual ifie The mos t rec ent v ita l compo nen t (regul ator) test reco rds w ere rev ie w ed by the in spe ctors f or s el ecte d S CB A equi pmen t cu rrentl y de si gnated f or e mergency us e.These rev ie w s re pres ente d tw o i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.4.

O T H E R AC T I V I T I E S (O A)Co rne rsto nes: Initiatin g Ev ents , Mitigatin g Sy stems , B arrie r In tegr ity , an d Emer gen cy P rep are dne ss 4OA1 Pe rf ormanc e In di cato r V eri f ic ati on (711 51).1 Re acto r S afety S trategic A rea a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs s ampl ed the li cen see's su bmi ttal s for the pe rf ormanc e i ndi cato rs (P Is)li sted be lo The i nsp ecto rs u sed P I de f in iti ons an d gui dan ce con tai ned i n R ev is io n 4 of Nu cl ear En ergy Ins titu te D ocu ment 99-0 2, "R egul atory A sse ssmen t P erformance Indi cato r Gui del in e," to v eri f y the ac cura cy of the P I da t The foll ow in g PIs w ere rev ie w ed:

19 En cl osu re*

Un pl ann ed Scra ms;*

Scra ms w ith Loss of Norm al Heat Removal;

Un pl ann ed Po w er C han ges; an d *

RC S Lea kag e.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed sel ecte d a ppl ic abl e c ond iti ons an d d ata f rom l ogs, l ic ens ee ev ent repo rts, a nd CA RD s from Jan uary 20 05 throu gh Jan uary 20 07, f or e ach P I are a s pec ifie d abo v The i nsp ecto rs i nde pen den tly re-p erformed ca lc ul ati ons w here ap pl ic abl The inspect ors comp ared that inf orm ation to the inf orm ation re q uired f or each PI def inition in t he g uid eli ne to ens ur e t he lice ns ee re po r t ed th e da t a c or r ec t ly.These acti v iti es compl eted four p erformance in di cato r i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Emergenc y P repa redn ess a.

Insp ecti on Sco peT he inspect ors revi ew ed sam ples of li cense e recor ds assoc iated w ith the t hree EP perf orm ance indicato rs listed belo Ins pect ors v erif ied that the licensee accur ately r e p o r t e d t h e s e i n d i c a t o r s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h r e l e v a n t p r o c e d u r e s a n d N u c l e a r E n e r gy Insti tute guid anc e e ndo rsed by the N R S pec ifica ll y , the i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed li cen see r e c o r d s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h P I d a t a r e p o r t e d t o t h e N R C fo r t h e p e r i o d A p r i l 2 0 0 6 t h r o u gh De cembe r 20 0 R ev ie w ed reco rds in cl ude d: proc edu ral gui dan ce on ass ess in g opp ortun iti es f or th ese thre e P Is; p re-de si gnated Co ntrol R oom Si mul ator trai ni ng ses si ons , the 20 06 bi enn ia l ex erci se, and i ntegrated eme rgency res pon se f aci li ty dri ll s;revisions of the ros ter of person nel assig ned to k ey ERO posit ions; and re sults of periodic AN S ope rabi li ty tes t The foll ow in g PIs w ere rev ie w ed:*

ANS;*

ER O Dri ll P arti ci pati on; and*

Dri ll an d E x erci se Pe rf ormanc e.These acti v iti es compl eted thre e i nsp ecti on sampl e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie En cl osu re 4OA2 Iden tifica tio n a nd Re sol uti on of Prob le ms (71 152).1 R o u ti n e R e v i e w o f Id e n ti fic a ti o n a n d R e so l u ti o n o f P ro b l e ms a.

Insp ecti on Sco peAs di scu sse d i n p rev io us sec tio ns of thi s re port, the in spe ctors routi nel y rev ie w ed is sue s duri ng ba sel in e i nsp ecti on acti v iti es and pl ant statu s re v ie w s to v eri f y the y w ere bei ng e n te re d i n to t h e l i ce n se e's c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n s y st e m a t a n a p p ro p ri a te t h re sh o l d , a d e qua te atten tio n w as bei ng giv en to ti mel y co rrecti v e a cti ons , an d a dv erse tren ds w ere id enti f ie d a n d a d d re ss e b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 An nua l Sa mpl e: Re v ie w of Issu es Re la tin g to H uman P erformance a.

Insp ecti on Sco peThe i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed is sue s re la tin g to l ow l ev el hu man performance du rin g De cembe r 20 06 and the first qua rter o f 20 0 The in spe ctors rev ie w ed CA RD s 0 6-27 827 , 0 6-2 7 9 7 4 , 0 6-2 7 6 8 1 , 0 7-2 0 3 7 8 , 0 7-2 0 4 9 0 , 0 7-2 0 5 1 0 , 0 7-2 0 5 1 9 , a n d 0 7-2 0 7 8 b.

Observ ati onsBa sed on a rev ie w of the l ic ens ee CA RD s, th e i nsp ecto rs n oted an i ncre ase i n th e numb er o f l ow l ev el hu man performance i ssu es that occ urred du rin g the la st mon th o f 200 6 a nd the f irs t quarter of 200 An i nv esti gatio n o f the C AR Ds ass oci ated w ith the se is sue s re v eal ed a v ari ety of hu man performance i nci den ts i nv ol v in g non sa f ety-rel ated equi pmen t, i ncl udi ng v al v e a nd sw itc h mi s-po si tio ns, mai nten anc e p erformed o n th e w rong e quip ment, a nd si gnifica nt re w ork on the sou th R W CU pu mp d ue to p oor w orker prac tic es duri ng the pu mp re bui l A s p art o f the l ic ens ee's c orrec tiv e a cti ons , the l i ce n se e i n te gra te d mo re h u ma n p e rfor ma n ce t re n d i n g i n to t h e c o rr e ct i v e a ct i o n p ro ce ss. The l ic ens ee reco gniz ed that the di spo si tio n o f the hu man performance tren d e v al uati ons h a d n o t b e e n ful l y e ff e ct i v Th e l i ce n se e u se d t h e F e b ru a ry 2 0 0 7 l e a d e rs h i p b ri e fin g to increa se plant w ork er awareness of the issue and com pleted a com mo n cause analysis on the is sue of hu man performance on M arch 28 , 20 0 The li cen see pl ans to imp le ment the corre cti v e a cti ons from the common cau se duri ng the se con d qua rter o f 20 07.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl c.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie En cl osu re 4OA3 Ev ent Fol lo w up (711 53).1 R W C U 'B' P u mp S e a l F a i l u re a.

Insp ecti on Sco peOn F e b ru a ry 6 , 2 0 0 7 , R W C U 'B' s e a l fai l u re l e d t o a n i so l a ti o n o f th e R W C U s y st e m. The i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the ope rators foll ow the ab normal op erati ng pro ced ures an d dep ress uri z e th e R W CU sy stem to sto p th e l ea Op erati ons v eri f ie d th at th e l eak w as is ol ated an d th at th e 'A' trai n o f R W CU w as in tac F ol lo w in g the v eri f ic ati ons of sy stem in tegrity , the i nsp ecto rs o bse rv ed the ope rators res tore the RW CU sy stem to op erati on usi ng the 'A' trai n.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl b.

F i n d i n gsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d..2 Inad equate Ve rifica tio n o f A lte rnate E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty R ead in ess a.

Insp ecti on Sco peDu rin g the w eek of Fe brua ry 19 , 20 07, the li cen see remo v ed the normal eme rgency ope rati ons facil ity (E OF) from serv ic e for re mode li n On Feb ruary 21 , 20 07, the in spe ctors drov e to the al terna te E OF (A EOF) to to ur th e faci li ty for rea di nes s.These acti v iti es compl eted on e i nsp ecti on sampl e. b.

F i n d i n gsIntrod ucti on: The in spe ctors id enti f ie d a find in g of v ery l ow sa f ety si gnifica nce (Green)f or th e fai lu re to v eri f y ad equate compe nsa tory ac tio ns w ere in pl ace w hi le the E OF w as una v ai la bl The A EOF w as modi f ie d s uch tha t ac tiv ati on of the f aci li ty w oul d h av e b een si gnifica ntl y de la y ed.D e sc ri p ti o n: Th e l i ce n se e s ta rt e d r e mo d e l i n g th e E OF w h i ch r e n d e re d t h e E OF una v ai la bl e for fiv e d ay s b egin ni ng Fe brua ry 19 , 20 0 A s a co mpen sato ry ac tio n, th e li cen see pl ann ed to u se thei r A EOF f or e mergency res pon se if requi re The AE OF i s a medi um-si z ed mul tip urpo se con f eren ce roo Insi de the AE OF i s a l ocked stora ge roo m w ith the requi red materi al s s uch as pro ced ures , map s, d ose as ses sment compu ter, e tc.On F ebru ary 21 , 20 07, tw o d ay s a f ter th e re mode li ng be gan, the i nsp ecto rs i nformed th e licensee of their desir e to tour the AEOF t o v erif y the r eadiness of the f acility w hich is lo cate d i n a D etroi t E di son bu il di ng ap prox ima tel y 25 mi le s from Fe rm A membe r of the Fermi E RO met the in spe ctors at th e faci li t U pon arri v al , the i nsp ecto rs a nd li cen see repre sen tati v e d is cov ered tha t l ocks h ad bee n i nsta ll ed on the doo rs to the co nference room w ithout the licensee's k nowl edg T he lock s w ere inst alled sev eral days previ ously to h el p s ecu re c ompu ters in the roo m tha t w ere bei ng use d to tes t an up grade to th e 22 En cl osu re c o m p a n y's ne t wo r O n ly t wo k e ys wer e av a il a b le , bo t h of whi c h wer e m a in t a in e d by t wo admi ni strati v e a ssi stan ts w ho w ork duri ng the da y an d a re n ot o n a ny rel ev ant pagi ng or ca l l-o u t l i st.The A EOF acti v ati on proc edu re s tated tha t a key to the stora ge roo m i s kept w ith the Re gion al S y stem S upe rv is or, a po si tio n i n th e b ui ld in g staff ed con tin ual ly i n th e R egio nal Operati ons C ente r (R OC); h ow ev er, D etroi t E di son co nso li date d s ev eral mon ths ago a nd mo v e d t h i s p o si ti o n t o a l o ca ti o n 2 5 mi l e s a w a E v e n a fter t h e c o n so l i d a ti o n , th e R OC re ma i n e d c o n ti n u o u sl y l o cke d b e h i n d ke y-c a rd e d d o o r A fter 4 5 mi n u te s, t h e i n sp e ct o rs and the l ic ens ee w ere abl e to l oca te o ne of the f ew i ndi v id ual s w ho cou ld op en the doo r a n d ga i n a cc e ss t o t h e R O A ke y t o t h e s to ra ge ro o m w a s a l so s ta ged i n t h e E OF , b u t li cen see sta f f w oul d h av e gon e d ire ctl y to the AE OF i f res pon di ng f rom h ome duri ng off ho ur F urthe r, rad io s th e l ic ens ee w oul d h av e re li ed on f or o f f si te d ose as ses sment team s w ere also locat ed in the ROC.

Ha d th e l ic ens ee nee ded to staff the A EOF duri ng off-normal ho urs, thes e u nforseen ci r cu m st an ce s c ou ld h ave del aye d t he ac t ivat ion of th e f ac ilit y w hic h c ou ld h ave adv erse ly aff ecte d th e a bi li ty of the l ic ens ee to p rotec t the pu bl ic i n th e e v ent of an emergenc C ons equen tly , the facil ity cu stod ia n d is abl ed the lo cks, the li cen see est ablished a continuous w atc h at the AEO F, and cor pora te sec urit y auth orized all EOF mem bers access t o the ROC.

The l ic ens ee di d n ot p hy si cal ly v eri f y the rea di nes s o f the A EOF pri or to remo v in g the E OF fro m s e rv i ce b u t ra th e r v e ri fie d t h a t th e l a st s u rv e i l l a n ce w a s sa ti sfa ct o ri l y c o mp l e te d. The l ic ens ee f urthe r co ncl ude d th at th e o nl y co ntrol s i n p la ce to e nsu re th e re adi nes s o f th e r o o m w a s v i a a n i n form a l v e rb a l a gre e me n t w i th s u p e rv i so ry p e rs o n n e l i n t h e b u i l d i n g. As suc h, a formal "le tter o f agree ment" b etw een F ermi an d D etroi t E di son's F aci li tie s a nd Ass et M ana gement w as si gned to e nsu re p rope r co ntrol s re mai ned i n p la ce.A n a l y si s: The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d t h e fai l u re t o v e ri fy a d e qua te c o mp e n sa to ry measu res w ere in pl ace pri or to remo v in g the EOF f rom se rv ic e w as a p erformance defici enc y w arran tin g a s igni f ic anc e d etermi nati o The in spe ctors dete rmin ed the is sue w as more than mi nor bec aus e i t w as si mil ar to an ex ampl e que sti on in IM C 061 2, Ap pen di x E , i n th at th e A EOF and the pro ced ures for acti v ati ng the A EOF w ere in a con di tio n th at w oul d h av e a f f ecte d th e l ic ens ee's res pon se to a n e mergenc U si ng IM C 060 9, A ppe ndi x B , "E mergency P repa redn ess S igni f ic anc e D etermi nati on Pro ces s"d a te d M a rc h 6 , 2 0 0 3 , th e i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d t h i s i ss u e w a s o f v e ry l o w s a fety si gnifica nce (Green) be cau se the dura tio n for w hi ch ade quate compe nsa tory mea sure s w e re n o t i n p l a ce w h i l e t h e E OF w a s n o t fun ct i o n a l w a s l e ss t h a n s e v e n d a y s. (F IN 0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 7 0 0 2-0 2).En f orce ment: The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the requi rements of 10 C FR 50 , A ppe ndi x B , an d 1 0 C F R 5 0.4 7 a n d d e te rmi n e d t h i s fin d i n g d i d n o t i n v o l v e a v i o l a ti o n o f N R C r e qui re me n ts si nce ne ith er th e A EOF nor the EOF are safety-rel ated an d th e i ssu e d id no t i nv ol v e e ith er a d egrada tio n o r the au gm enta tio n o f the facil ity bu t rath er th e ti mel in ess of acti v ati ng the f acilit T he inspect ors revi ew ed the licensee'

s Emer g ency Pl an and deter mined that it did not requi re faci li ty ac tiv ati on w ith in an y pre scri bed ti me l imi The refore, al l emergency p l a n n i n g s ta n d a rd s w e re s a ti sfi e Th i s i ss u e h a s b e e n e n te re d i n to t h e l i ce n se e's 23 En cl osu re corre cti v e a cti on program a s C AR D 07-2 103 Once the is sue w as id enti f ie d, th e l i ce n se e e n su re d t h e l o cks w e re d i sa b l e d a n d c o n ti n u o u sl y s ta ff e d t h e A E OF w i th a n E OF member unti l pos iti v e c ontro ls w ere in pl ace to ens ure con tin ued av ai la bi li ty of the A EOF.4OA5 Other A cti v iti es.1 (C l o se d) U R I (0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 5 0 1 6-0 1): R e v i e w o f Fe rmi 2 l i ce n si n g b a si s w i th r e gar d t o the miti gatio n o f torn ado eff ects.Du rin g the prev io us in spe cti on, the li cen see w as not abl e to pro v id e a n a nal y si s o r oth er d o cu me n ta ti o n t o d e mo n st ra te t h a t th e R H R c o mp l e x a n d i ts e n cl o se d c o mp o n e n ts w e re cap abl e o f w ith stan di ng the de pres suri z ati on eff ects that cou ld oc cur if a torna do pas sed di rectl y ov er th e b ui ld in The i nsp ecto rs p ostu la ted that if a torna do dep ress uri z ati on z one pa sse d b y the R HR co mpl ex , the ou tsi de ai r pre ssu re w oul d b e h ighe r tha n th e redu ced pre ssu re i nsi de the di ese l genera tor ro oms, th ereb y cl osi ng the grav ity ex hau st damp er The in spe ctors pos tul ated tha t thi s p hen omen on cou ld res ul t i n a max imu m pres sure di f f eren tia l of 3 p si d b etw een the no rmal ou tsi de atmosp heri c p ress ure and the redu ced i nsi de atmosp heri c p ress ur Thi s d iff eren tia l pres sure co ul d d ev el op acro ss both the v enti la tio n s y stem i ntake a nd ex hau st d ampe rs a s w el l as acro ss the bui ld in g str uct ural com ponent s such as the roo Th e inspecto rs were concer ned that the EDG su p p o rt s y st e ms o r th e s tr u ct u re t h a t e n cl o se d t h e E D Gs c o u l d , th e re fore , b e d a ma ged. This i ssu e w as con si dere d a n u nres ol v ed ite m (UR I 05 000 341/200 501 6-01) pe ndi ng f urt her r evi ew of Ferm i 2's li censing basis by the NRC.The i n sp e ct o rs p e rfor me d a n i n i ti a l r e v i e w o f N U R E G-0 7 9 8 , "S a fety E v a l u a ti o n R e p o rt R e l a te d t o t h e Op e ra ti o n o f E n ri co F e rmi A to mi c P o w e r P l a n t, D o cke t N o. 5 0-3 4 1 ,"date d J ul y 19 8 S ecti on 3.2.2 , "Torna do De si gn Cri teri a," d esc rib ed NR R's re v ie w of the Fer mi 2 tor nado desig n crite ri T he docum ent con cluded that the desig n basis torna do and the pro ced ures us ed f or c al cul ati ng l oad in gs on structu res met the app li cab le requi rements of Re gula tory Gui de 1.76 an d w as acc epta bl The d ocu ment f urthe r sta ted that "the use of the se proc edu res prov id es ass uran ce that, in the ev ent of a d esi gn ba si s to rnad o, th e s tructu ral i ntegri ty of the pl ant structu res that nee d to be d e si gne d for t o rn a d o s w i l l n o t b e i mp a i re d a n d , i n c o n se que n ce , sa fety-r e l a te d s y st e ms and co mpon ents l oca ted w ith in the se structu res w il l be ade quatel y pro tecte d a nd may be expected to perf orm their neces sar y saf ety f unct ions as req uired." Th e inspecto rs cou ld not det erm ine if t his saf ety ev aluation rep ort considere d the issue descr ibed above since it di d n ot a ppe ar to ad dres s re-pres suri z ati on eff ect The in spe ctors al so note d th at Re gula tory Gui de 1.76 de scri bed the de si gn ba si s to rnad o, b ut i t di d n ot d is cus s th e structu ral de si gn requi rements for torna do prote cti on.The i ss u e w a s d i sc u ss e d w i th N R R p e rs o n n e l a n d i t w a s d e te rmi n e d t h a t l i ce n se e s w e re not spe ci f ic al ly requi red to a nal y z e th e s tructu ral i ntegri ty of the H VA C sy stems, or o ther i n te rn a l s y st e ms , i n C a te gor y I s tr u ct u re s to w i th st a n d t o rn a d o d e p re ss u ri z a ti o n e ff e ct s. H o w e v e r, i n N R C R e gul a to ry I ss u e S u mma ry (R IS) 2 0 0 6-2 3 , "P o st-To rn a d o Op e ra b i l i ty of Ven til ati ng an d A ir-C ond iti oni ng Sy stems Ho use d i n E mergency D ie sel Gen erato r Ro om s" dat ed Dec em be r 6, 200 6, th e NR C st af f co nc lud ed th at lice ns ee s m ay no t have a d e qua te l y c o n si d e re d t o rn a d o w i n d a n d p re ss u re-d ro p e ff e ct s o n s a fety-r e l a te d s y st e ms a n d c o mp o n e n ts i n si d e b u i l d i n g s tr u ct u re s o p e n t o t h e o u ts i d e e n v i ro n me n The R IS f urthe r do cumen ted that li cen see s s hou ld take a ny ne ces sary mea sure s to en sure the ope rabi li ty of v enti la tio n a nd ai r co ndi tio ni ng du ct s y stems lo cate d i n E DG ro om En cl osu reThe i nsp ecto rs c ond ucte d a w al kdow n o f F ermi 2 RH R/E DG c ompl ex , rev ie w ed v ari ous pl ant doc umen ts, e ngaged i n d is cus si ons w ith se v eral pl ant pers onn el an d ma de the fol l o w i n g qu a l i ta ti v e a ss e ss me n t:*

Du rin g a to rnad o (d epre ssu riz ati on outs id e), th e ro of mounte d E DG/RH R and swi tch g ear r oom HVAC exhaust dam pers (all of w hich are m issile protec ted) w ill ope n to equa li z e th e p ress ure, so no di f f eren tia l pres sure (dp) w il l ex is t be tw een t h e i n s i d e a n d o u t s i d e o f t h e E D G/R H R b u i l d i n g.*

After a torna do pas ses the bu il di ng (re-p ress uri z ati on outs id e), th e E DG/RH R and swi tch g ear r oom HVAC intak e damp ers w ill each allow in-leak ag e of approximat ely 300 cu bi c feet p er mi nute of ai r thro ugh e x is tin g ope ni ngs (un der f ul ly cl ose d pos iti on), there by red uci ng the po stul ated 3 psi dp be tw een i nsi de and ou tsi de the bu ild ing s c on si de r ab ly and eq ua lizin g th e pr es su r e r ela t ively q uic k ly.*

Al l the ess enti al sw itc hgear, ED G con trol pa nel s, a nd M CC are su f f ic ie ntl y v ente d, w h i ch e l i mi n a te d t h e d i ff e re n ti a l p re ss u re c o n ce rn s e x p re ss e d i n t h e U R I.*

The ro of sla b h ad suff ic ie nt d esi gn margin to w ith stan d th e e f f ects of a to rnad o.*

T he two of f site power sourc es/swi tch yard av ailable at Fer mi 2 are g eog raph ically sep arate d (o ne lo cate d a t the so uth si de and the oth er a t the w est si de of the p l a n t), w h i ch c o n si d e ra b l y r e d u ce s th e p ro b a b i l i ty o f a to rn a d o c a u si n g c o mp l e te lo ss of of f si te p ow er a t Fe rmi 2.*

The E DG c ombu sti on ai r i ntake a nd ex hau st a re u naff ecte d b y the depr essur iz ation and re-

pres sur iz ation ef f ect s of a tornad o based on their lo cati on and the fact tha t the y are w el l shi el ded from torna do born e mi ssi le s.*

The o n l y c o mp o n e n t th a t ma y ma l fun ct i o n/d a ma ge d u ri n g re-p re ss u ri z a ti o n a fter a torna do is the E DG/RH R room v enti la tio n e x hau st grav ity da mper moun ted on the roo D amage to thi s d ampe r do es not aff ect the immed ia te o pera bi li ty of the ED Gs, R HR se rv ic e w ater and E DG s erv ic e w ater pump This w il l onl y aff ect the ro o m h e a t u p r a t Op e ra to r a ct i o n s i n r e sp o n se t o t h e E D G r o o m t e mp e ra tu re alarm s (in the cont rol room) are ex pect ed to res tor e EDG/RHR room HVAC sy st e ms i n a t i me l y ma n n e r.The i nsp ecto rs a ls o re v ie w ed the app li cab il ity rev ie w of thi s R IS con duc ted by the l ic ens ee and do cumen ted in an atta chmen t to CA RD 05-264 9 The in spe ctors con cl ude d th at th e app li cab il ity rev ie w pe rf ormed by the l ic ens ee w as ade quate as it w as bas ed on the si mi l a r qua l i ta ti v e a ss e ss me n t/a rgu me n ts a s d e sc ri b e d a b o v Th e re fore , th e i n sp e ct o rs dete rmin ed no performance de f ic ie nci es or v io la tio ns of regula tory requi rements oc curre d and no ad di tio nal en f orce ment acti on w as w arran te The in spe ctors had no further con cern s i n th is are This un reso lv ed ite m i s c lo sed..2 (C l o se d) U R I (0 5 0 0 0 3 4 1/2 0 0 5 0 1 6-0 2): R e v i e w o f Fe rmi 2 l i ce n si n g b a si s w i th r e gar d to th e p oten tia l rel eas e p ath v ia the co nde nsa te s torage tank (C ST) foll ow in g the lo ss of coolant accident (LO CA)

25 En cl osu reDu rin g the 200 5 S afety S y stem D esi gn an d P erformance Ca pab il ity i nsp ecti on, the in spe ctors id enti f ie d a n u nres ol v ed ite m con cern in g a p oten tia l radi oac tiv e re le ase path v ia the CST f ollow ing a LOC W hile i n stand by, the RCIC system is norm ally al igne d to the C ST thro ugh a ch eck v al v e E 515 0F0 11 (F01 1) a nd normal ly op en motor ope rated v al v e (M OV) E 515 0F0 10 (F01 0). W hen the l ev el i n th e C ST de crea ses to a pred etermi ned se tpoi nt o r w hen the l ev el i n th e s upp ress io n p ool i ncre ase s to a pred eter mined setpoint , the suction pat h sw itches to the suppr ession pool as the nor ma lly cl ose d M OVs E5 150 F02 9 (F 029) an d E 515 0F0 31 (F03 1) o pen an d M OV F 010 cl ose s.The H PC I sy stem functi ons i n a si mil ar ma nne r w ith C ST su cti on che ck v al v e E 415 0F0 19 (F01 9) a nd normal ly op en M OV E 415 0F0 04 (F00 4) a nd the sup pres si on poo l suc tio n v a l v e s, n o rma l l y c l o se d M OV s E 4 1 5 0 F 0 4 1 (F 0 4 1) a n d E 4 1 5 0 F 0 4 2 (F 0 4 2). The i nsp ecto rs w ere con cern ed that the li cen see di d n ot l eak tes t the C ST su cti on or th e suppr ession pool suct ion v alv e T he inspect ors postulat ed that f ollow ing a design basis LOCA an d a ran ge of in termedi ate brea k LOCA s, th e p ress ure di f f eren tia l betw een the su p p re ss i o n p o o l a n d C S T c o u l d c a u se p o te n ti a l l y c o n ta mi n a te d , ra d i o a ct i v e w a te r to be trans f erred from the sup pres si on poo l to th e C ST thro ugh th e M OVs and ch eck v al v e A s th e C ST i s v ente d, th is co ul d re sul t i n a rad io acti v e re le ase ou tsi de of the curre nt 1 0 C FR 10 0 a nd Genera l De si gn Cri teri a 1 9 re quire ments.The l ic ens ee doc umen ted thi s i ssu e a s C AR D 05-2 669 The l ic ens ee bel ie v ed that the sec ond ary co ntai nmen t by pas s l eakage p ostu la ted in the ab ov e s cen ari o w as not part of pl ant des ign and l ic ens in g basi The l ic ens ee bas ed thi s p osi tio n i n p art o n th e re spo nse to th e Thre e M il e Is la nd (TM I) Ques tio n H.III.1.1.1, w hi ch state d th at th e C ST w as id enti f ie d a s i sol ated from hi ghly co ntami nate d s y stem The li cen see al so state d th at th e p l a n t d e s i gn a n d l i c e n s i n g b a s i s a s s u me d e me r ge n c y c o r e c o o l i n g s y s t e m l i qu i d l e a ka ge occ urred w ith in the se con dary co ntai nmen t bo und ary an d w as li mite d to a rate of 5 ga llons per minut Furt herm ore, UFSAR Sect ion 6.2.1.2.2.3 ident if ied that the HPCI and R CIC C ST su cti on li nes w ere ex cl ude d a s b y pas s l eakage p aths on the ba si s th at they w ere sea le d w ith w ater. The i nsp ecto rs c onc lu ded tha t the C ST w oul d b e i sol ated f rom co ntami nate d s ourc es if the v al v es in questi on w ere sho w n to be l eak-tigh Be cau se thi s h as not bee n d emon strate d, th e i nsp ecto rs b el ie v ed the li cen see may no t be mee tin g th e i r l i ce n si n g a n d d e si gn b a si s. NR C Re v ie w an d C onc lu si on:D u ri n g th i s fol l o w u p i n sp e ct i o n , th e i n sp e ct o rs r e v i e w e d s e v e ra l l i ce n se e d o cu me n ts in cl udi ng UF SA R sec tio ns and tab le s; i nse rv ic e te sti ng requi rements an d d ocu ments;and HPCI and RCIC Desig n Basis Docume nt Th e inspecto rs also cons ulted NRR pers onn el an d re v ie w ed tw o re la ted task i nterface agreemen t res pon ses at Su squeha nna (TAC# M 862 76) and H.B Ro bi nso n (TIA 94-2 2) p la nt The in spe ctors dete rmin ed that w ith res pec t to li cen si ng or pos t-TM I l ic ens e c ond iti ons , v al v es w hi ch is ol ate pote nti al p a th w a y s w e re n o t co n si d e re d c o n ta i n me n t i so l a ti o n v a l v e s su b je ct t o l o ca l l e a k ra te testi n A ls o, th e s ourc e te rms i n th e l ic ens in g basi s for pl ants do no t as sume w ater le akage as a c ontri buto r to off-si te d ose Therefore, th e i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t the li cen see w as not requi red to l eak tes t the v al v es in questi on.The i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the li cen see's ac tio ns in res pon se to C AR Ds 05-2 669 9 a nd 05-2 667 The l ic ens ee imp le mented the foll ow in g acti ons:

26 En cl osu re*

Re v is ed mai nten anc e p racti ces by requi rin g peri odi c d is ass embl y an d i nsp ecti on of the HP CI che ck v al v e (F 019) i n th e C ST su cti on li n The f irs t di sas sembl y an d i n sp e ct i o n w a s sa ti sfa ct o ri l y c o mp l e te d d u ri n g a r e ce n t re fue l i n g o u ta ge. *

Revi sed the inservice tes ting prog ram to include str ok e test ing of the RCIC CST suc tio n l in e v al v e F 01 In ad di tio n, th e l ic ens ee pl ann ed to p erform a re v erse le ak test on the RC IC che ck v al v e F 011 w hi ch w as al read y su bjecte d to rou tin e p re v e n ti v e ma i n te n a n ce d i sa ss e mb l y a n d i n se rv i ce i n sp e ct i o *

R e v i se d t h e i n se rv i ce t e st i n g p ro gra m t o i n cl u d e p e ri o d i c st ro ke te st i n g R C IC M OVs F029 and F01 Th e initial baseline str ok e-t ime te sting w as com pleted in F e b ru a ry 2 0 0 The i nsp ecto rs gene ral ly agree d w ith the l ic ens ee's d is pos iti on that und er a ll sc ena rio s, after con si deri ng si ngle fail ures , at le ast one sa f ety-rel ated v al v e w oul d b e functi ona l as a b arri e In s ome sce nari os, pea k acci den t co ndi tio ns w oul d re sul t i n s uff ic ie nt to rus p re ss u re t o l i ft e me rge n cy c o re c o o l i n g s y st e m w a te r to t h e C S T v i a t h e s u ct i o n l i n e s. The e mergency op erati ng pro ced ures w oul d d ire ct th e o pera tors to i ni tia te th e to rus spra y s e arl y i n th e e v ent, thus the pe rio d o f ti me d uri ng w hi ch torus pre ssu re w oul d b e su ff i ci e n t to p u sh w a te r to w a rd t h e C S T i s e x p e ct e d t o b e v e ry s h o rt , a b o u t o n e d a y. Be cau se of the la rge v ol ume of pi pi ng be tw een the C ST an d th e C ST sw ap is ol ati on v al v es and ty pi cal v al v e l eak rate s, th e i nsp ecto rs d etermi ned tha t i t w oul d ta ke many d a y s to fi l l t h e H P C I a n d R C IC C S T s u ct i o n l i n e The i n sp e ct o rs d e te rmi n e d n o p e rfor ma n ce d e fic i e n ci e s o r v i o l a ti o n s o f re gul a to ry re qui re me n ts w e re i d e n ti fie d a n d n o a d d i ti o n a l e n forc e me n t a ct i o n w a s w a rr a n te d. The i nsp ecto rs h ad no f urthe r co nce rns in thi s a re Thi s u nres ol v ed ite m i s c lo sed.4 OA 6 E x i t M e e t i n gs.1 E x i t M e e ti n g S u mma ryOn A pri l 5, 2 007 , the i nsp ecto rs p rese nted the i nsp ecti on resu lts to M r. J. Da v is an d o ther me mb e rs o f l i ce n se e ma n a gem e n t a t th e c o n cl u si o n o f th e i n sp e ct i o Th e i n sp e ct o rs asked the li cen see w heth er a ny mate ria l ex ami ned du rin g the in spe cti on sho ul d b e con si dere d p ropri etar N o p ropri etary i nformatio n w as id enti f ie d..2 I n t e r i m E x i t M e e t i n gsThe fol l o w i n g i n te ri m e x i t me e ti n gs w e re c o n d u ct e d for: *

Emergenc y P repa redn ess i nsp ecti on w ith M r. D. Gi pso n o n M arch 9, 200 7;*

Occup ati ona l radi ati on safety pro gram f or ra di ati on moni tori ng i nstru mentati on and prote cti v e e quip ment w ith M ess rs. D. C obb an d K. H la v aty on M arch 23 , 20 07.4OA7 Li cen see-Iden tifie d V io la tio nsNo find in gs of si gnifica nce w ere id enti f ie d.A TTA C H M E N T: S U P P L E M E N TA L I N F OR M A TION 1

A tt a ch me n t S U P P L E ME N T A L I N F OR MA T ION KEY POINTS OF CONTA CT Li cen see J. D av is , S eni or V ic e P resi den t an d C hi ef Nuc le ar Off ic er D. Gi b so n , E x e cu ti v e V i ce P re si d e n t a n d C h i e f N u cl e a r Off i ce r D. Co bb, Ass is tant Vi ce Pre si den t N ucl ear Genera tio n K. Hl av aty , P la nt M ana ger B. Be rtossi , R adi ati on Pro tecti on K. Bu rke, Su perv is or, P erformance En gine eri ng R. Gaston , M ana ger, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng D. Ha rman, R adi ati on Pro tecti on A. Ha sso un, Pri nci pal Li cen si ng En gine er D. Ku sumaw ati , E ngin eer, Nu cl ear Li cen si ng R. Li bra, Di recto r N ucl ear En gine eri ng K. M orri s, E mergency P repa redn ess S upe rv is or D. No etz el , M ana ger Nu cl ear Sy stem E ngin eeri ng B. O'D onn el l, M ana ger, Pe rf ormanc e E ngin eeri ng M. P hi li ppo n, Ope rati ons M ana ger G. Pi cca rd, M ana ger, Ra di ati on Pro tecti on J. P lo na, Di recto r, N ucl ear En gine eri ng J. P rie st, R adi ati on Pro tecti on Su perv is or T. Van derM ay , R adi ati on Pro tecti on NRC C. Li pa, Ch ie f , D iv is io n o f R eac tor P rojects , B ranc h 4 S. Orth, Le ade r, D iv is io n o f R eac tor S afety , P la nt S upp ort Tea m K. Ri emer, C hi ef, Di v is io n o f R eac tor S afety , P la nt S upp ort B ranc h A. Sto ne, Di v is io n o f R eac tor S afety , B ranc h 2 2

A tt a ch me n tLIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, A ND DISCUSSED Opene d a nd Cl ose d 050 003 41/2 007 002-01 NC V Fai lu re to P erform a C ompl ete Ca li brati on of the Co ntai nmen t H igh Ra nge A rea Ra di ati on M oni tor050 003 41/2 007 002-02 FIN Inad equate Ve rifica tio n o f A lte rnate E mergency Operati ons F aci li ty R ead in ess Cl ose d 050 003 41/2 005 016-01 UR I Re v ie w of Fe rmi 2 l ic ens in g basi s w ith regard to the miti gatio n o f torn ado eff ects.050 003 41/2 005 016-02 UR I Re v ie w of Fe rmi 2 l ic ens in g basi s w ith regard to the pote nti al rel eas e p ath v ia the co nde nsa te s torage tank fol l o w i n g th e l o ss o f co o l a n t a cc i d e n t.Di scu sse d No n A tt a ch me n tLIST OF DOCUM ENT S REVIEWED The foll ow in g is a li st o f do cumen ts re v ie w ed duri ng the i nsp ecti o Inc lu si on on thi s l is t do es not imp ly tha t the N RC i nsp ecto rs re v ie w ed the doc umen ts i n th ei r en tire ty bu t rath er th at s el ecte d se ct i o n s o f po rt i o n s o f th e d o cu me n ts w e re e v a l u a te d a s p a rt o f th e o v e ra l l i n sp e ct i o n e ff o rt. In cl u si o n o f a d o cu me n t o n t h i s l i st d o e s n o t i mp l y N R C a cc e p ta n ce o f th e d o cu me n t o r a n y p a rt o f i t, u n l e ss t h i s i s st a te d i n t h e b o d y o f th e i n sp e ct i o n r e p o rt.Se ction 1R 01: A dv ers e We athe r P rote ction 200 7 C ol d W eath er P repa rati ons Se ction 1R 04: E quip ment A lignme nt CA RD 06-221 25; Bro ken E le ctri cal F le x C ond ui t; da ted 04/1 0/20 06 CA RD 06-225 90; NR C Iden tifie d C onc ern W ith D iv. I C ore Sp ray an d D efense In D epth;date d 0 4/21/200 6 CA RD 06-229 11; Pa cking L eak On E2 100-F00 7A; da ted 04/2 8/20 06 CA RD 06-229 12; Pa cking L eak On E2 100-F00 6B; da ted 04/2 8/20 06 CA RD 06-233 66; Co re S pray P ump M otors Oi l Co ol er S eal in g Baff le A ddi tio ns; date d 05/1 5/20 06 CA RD 07-214 58; Fai le d P M T due to ex ces si v e d ead ban d i n R CIC turb in e o il fil ter s w itc h;date d 0 3/13/200 7 Dra w in g 6M 721-203 4; D ia gram Core S pray S y stem R eac tor B ui ld in g; dated 10/21/0 5 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 7; C ore Sp ray S y stem F unc tio nal Ope rati ng Sketch; da ted 10/2 1/05 D ra w i n g 6 M 7 2 1-5 7 0 9-1; R e a ct o r C o re I so l a ti o n C o o l i n g S y st e m F u n ct i o n a l Op e ra ti n g S ket ch; date d 0 5/18/200 6 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 6-1; Re si dua l He at R emov al D iv is io n II Sy stem F unc tio nal Ope rati ng Sketch;date d 0 3/05/200 4 Dra w in g 6M 721-570 6-3; Re si dua l He at R emov al S erv ic e W ater M ake U p D eca nt a nd Ov erflow Sy stems Fun cti ona l Operati ng Sketch; da ted 06/3 0/20 06 Jo b I D 0 1 7 5 0 6 1 0 0 6; P e rfor m 2 4.2 0 3.0 3 S e c-5.1 C S S P u mp A n d V a l v e Op e ra b i l i ty Te st;date d 1 0/06/200 6 Pro ced ure 23.2 03; Co re S pray S y stem; R ev is io n 4 0 Pro ced ure 24.2 03.0 3; D iv is io n 2 C SS P ump and V al v e Op erab il ity , an d A utomati c A ctua tio n;Re v is io n 4 5 Pro ced ure 23.2 06; Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g Sy stem; R ev is io n 8 6 Pro ced ure 23.2 05; Re si dua l He at R emov al S y stem; R ev is io n 9 8 Pro ced ure 23.2 08; RH R Co mpl ex S erv ic e W ater Sy stems; Re v is io n 8 5 ST-ES-339-002 8-00 1; C ore Sp ray S y stem E 210 0; R ev is io n 2 Se ction 1R 05Q: F ire Pro tectio n UF SA R Fi gure 9 A-4; Fi re P rotec tio n E v al uati on Re acto r an d A ux il ia ry B ui ld in gs Fi rst F lo or P la n;Re v is io n 1 4, d ated 11/06 Se ction 1R 06: F lood P rote ction Mea sur es AR P 2D 105; R eac tor B ui ld in g Corn er R ooms/ HP CI Ro om F lo od Lev el; R ev is io n 1 3 AR P 2D 78; Re acto r B ui ld in g Fl oor/E quip ment Dra in S umps Lev el H i-H i/L o-Lo; R ev is io n 1 4 Drawing 6M 721-2032; Sump Pum p Diagr am Radw ast e Sy ste m; Rev ision AY Drawing 6M 721-5710-2; Sum p Pumps Sy ste m Func tional Ope rat ing Ske tch; Revi sion AA 4

A tt a ch me n t Pro ced ure 47.0 00.8 4; L oca l Lea kag e R ate Testin g For Equi pmen t an d F lo or D rai n C hec k Va lv es - G11 01-F 140 7; d ated A pri l 22, 200 6 Surveill ance Schedu ling and T rac k ing; Perf orm 47.000.84 Sec 6.4 LLRT f or Floor Dra in Ch eck V al v es - G11 01F 140 7 a nd 140 8; d ated A pri l 14, 200 6 Surveill ance Schedu ling and T rac k ing; Perf orm 47.000.04 Sec 6.4 LLRT f or Eq uipme nt Dra in Ch eck V al v es G1101 F14 10 & 141 1; d ated A pri l 25, 200 6 Pe rf ormanc e E v al uati on Pro ced ure 27.7 02.0 1; R eac tor B ui ld in g Sump Cro ss-ti e F lo od Co ntrol Va lv e Tes t; R ev is io n 6 UF SA R 9.3.3; P la nt E quip ment and F lo or D rai ns UF SA R 2.4; Hy drol ogic En gine eri ng U F S A R 3.4; W a t e r L e v e l (F l o o d) D e s i gn Se ction 1R 07: H eat Sin k P erfo rmanc e ST-OP-31 5-00 65-0 01; Emergenc y D ie sel Gen erato r R 300 0; R ev is io n 1 7 W R 836 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 11 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 0/24/05 W R 840 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 12 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 0 1/30/06 W R 848 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 13 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 0/03/06 W R 844 060 100; P erform 18-M onth V is ual P M On ED G 14 JC S, LO, A CS H eat Ex cha ngers;date d 1 1/17/06 Se ction 1R 11: L icen sed Ope rato r R equ alifica tion Eval uation Scena rio SS-O P-904-101 2; Dryw ell Pres sur e Inst. Fails/RR Pum p Fails/Sm all LO CA/Par tial Failure of ECCS Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 4; F reez e P rotec tio n L in eup V eri f ic ati on; Re v is io n 3 2 Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 6; H ot W eath er Op erati ons; R ev is io n 0 Pro ced ure 27.0 00.0 7; C ol d W eath er Op erati ons; R ev is io n 0 W R W ST 94 055 2; d ated 02/13/0 7 Se ction 1R 12: Main tena nce E ffectiv ene ss Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance Pro ced ure 47.0 00.8 4; L oca l Lea kag e R ate f or E quip ment Surveill ance Perf orm ance Proc edur e 47.000.84; Sec 6.2, LLRT f or Eq uip DRN CK VL V's - G1101 F14 10 and 14 11; date d 0 4/25/200 6 Se ction 1R 13: Main tena nce R isk A sse ssme nt a nd Emer gen t Work E v alua tion CD F Ri sk Profil e for th e w eeks o f 1/2 9 to 2/5 an d 2/5 to 2/1 2 CD F Ri sk Profil e for th e w eek of 3/5 to 3/12 ED G 11 JC E x pan si on Tank Inl eakage 0 00Z 070 576; da ted 02/2 6/20 07 LE RF R is k Profil e for th e w eeks o f 1/2 9 to 2/5 an d 2/5 to 2/1 2 LE RF R is k Profil e for th e w eek of 3/5 to 3/12 Sch edu le r's E v al uati on f or F ermi 2; date d 0 3/03/200 7 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance Form 10/2 7/20 06; Pe rf orm 4 2.30 2.07 D iv 1 Bu s 6 4B 41 60V W orkw eek R is k f or W eek of 02/26/2 007 5

A tt a ch me n t Se ction 1R 15: Ope rab ility E v alua tions CA RD 06-276 64; AV R Genera l Al arm; da ted 12/0 3/20 06 C A R D 0 6-2 7 7 9 4; M i ss e d To rqu e a n d Ga ske t R e p l a ce me n t o n Th e rmo co u p l e Te rmi n a l C o v e r;date d 1 2/08/200 6 CA RD 06-277 94-0 2; Ope rabi li ty of TC; d ated 01/11/2 007 CA RD 07-214 21; 4D 53 AV R Genera l Al arm re cei v ed on 3/11/200 7; d ated 03/12/2 007 ODM I-06-0 09; AV R Genera l Al arm; R ev is io n 2 , da ted 12/2 1/20 06 ODM I 07-002; D W E D Su mp Temp Incre ase Li mita tio ns, Re v is io n 1 , da ted 03/2 6/20 07 Se ction 1R 19: P ost-Main tena nce T estin g CA RD 06-254 97; Tech Sp ec Va lu e for E DG M in imu m Vo lta ge i s L ow er Tha n Tec h S pec V al ue f or D iv is io n I De graded Gri d V ol tage; da ted 08/2 5/20 06 CA RD 07-212 65; RC IC Pu mp Outb oard S eal Le ak; date d 0 3/04/200 7 LC O Nu mber 200 6-04 85; R3 000 D iv is io n I ED Gs TS V al ue f or M in imu m Vo lta ge i s L ow er Tha n TS V al ue f or D iv is io n I De graded Gri d V ol tage; da ted 08/2 5/20 06 Pro ced ure 24.2 06.0 1; R CIC S y stem P ump and V al v e Op erab il ity Test; R ev is io n 6 5 Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 6; E mergency D ie sel Gen erato r 13 - Sta rt an d L oad Test; R ev is io n 4 6 S S T E v e n t 0 0 9 8; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.1 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - S l o w S ta rt S S T E v e n t 0 2 9 1; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.2 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - F a st S ta rt S S T E v e n t 0 2 9 9; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.3 1 E D G 1 2 2 4-H o u r R u n F o l l o w e d b y H o t F a st R e st a rt Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 4 S ec 5.1 ED G 11 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - S lo w Sta rt; da ted 11/2 9/20 06 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 4 S ec 5.2 ED G 11 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - F ast Sta rt; da ted 10/2 6/20 06 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 24.3 07.1 5, S ec 5.1 ED G 12 S tart a nd Loa d Tes t - S lo w Sta rt; da ted 02/0 3/20 07 S u rv e i l l a n ce P e rfor ma n ce; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.2 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - F a st S ta rt;date d 1 1/02/200 6 S u rv e i l l a n ce P e rfor ma n ce; P e rfor m 2 4.3 0 7.1 5 S e c 5.1 E D G 1 2 S ta rt a n d L o a d Te st - S l o w S ta rt;date d 1 2/02/200 6 Su rv ei ll anc e P erformance; Pro ced ure 29.3 07.3 0, E DG 1 1 2 4 H our Ru n F ol lo w ed by H ot F ast Re starts; date d 0 2/27/200 7 W R A4 170 601 00; Insp ect and Test Co ntrac tor a nd Ci rcui t D ev ic es f or R 160 0S 048;date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 313 8; L oos e K ni f e S w itc h a t i ts P iv ot C onn ecti on; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 170 8; R epl ace N ew F use B lo ck that w as Da maged D uri ng Fu se Insta ll ati on;date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000Z063204; Replace Contro l Tr ansf orm er X 4103C005, M CC 72EC-2C, Pos 3C; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z06 302 5; R epl ace C ontro l Transformer X4103 C0 06; date d 0 2/05/200 7 W R 000 Z07 064 2; R CIC P ump Outboa rd S eal Le ak; date d 0 3/07/200 7 Se ction 1E P2: A lert a nd No tificatio n Sy stem (A NS) E v alua tion EP-560; A le rt N oti f ic ati on Sy stem - Si ren Operati on and M ai nten anc e; R ev is io n 0 M onro e C oun ty E mergency M ana gement P la n; A nne x B; A ppe ndi x 1; Attac hmen t D; S pec ia l No tifica tio n P roce dure s; R ev is io n 1 2 A N S S i r e n M a l fu n c t i o n s a n d I n c o n gr u i t i e s S u mm a r y S h e e t s; d a t e d M a y 5 , 2 0 0 5 , t h r o u gh Feb ruary 28 , 20 07 6

A tt a ch me n t Lette r Fro m FE M A Re gion V; A ppro v al of Fe rmi 2 P ow er P la nt P ropo sed P ubl ic A le rt an d No tifica tio n S y stem R epl ace ment; d ated Ja nua ry 21 , 20 03 CA RD 06-260 21; AN S Co mmuni cati on Fai lu re from the M onro e C oun ty D is patc h C ontro l Sta tio n;date d S epte mber 18, 200 6 Si ren Test R esu lts R eco rds; date d M ay 25 , 20 05, throu gh Fe brua ry 28 , 20 07 C A R D 0 6-2 4 3 3 4; A l e rt a n d N o ti fic a ti o n S y st e m S i re n N u mb e r 2 7 F a i l e d M o n th l y Te st;date d J une 28 , 20 06 C A R D 0 6-2 2 8 0 6; A l e rt a n d N o ti fic a ti o n S y st e m S i re n N u mb e r 4 9 D i sp l a y i n g C OM M F A IL U R E; date d A pri l 26, 200 6 CARD 06-20370; Alert and Notif ication System Siren Number 49 Di splayi ng COM M FAILURE;date d J anu ary 26 , 20 06 CA RD 05-260 88; AN S Traf f ic D amaged Si ren Nu mber 59; date d Octo ber 31, 200 5 CA RD 05-242 58; AN S Traf f ic A cci den t D amaged Si ren Nu mber 2; d ated Ju ly 18 , 20 05 Se ction 1E P3: Emer gen cy R esp ons e Org aniz ation S taffing an d A ugme ntatio n Sy stem Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P la n, Tab le B-1; S taff in g For Fermi 2 Emergenc y R esp ons e Org ani z ati on; Re v is io n 3 1 EP-290; E mergency N oti f ic ati ons; R ev is io n 4 5 EP-292; E mergency C al l Out - Ba ckup M etho d; R ev is io n 2 8 EP-570; E mergency C al l Out S y stem - Testin g and M ai nten anc e; R ev is io n 0 QP-ER-665 , E ncl osu re A; E RO Trai ni ng Co urse s a nd Train in g M atri x; R ev is io n 2 7 Fermi 2 ER O Team Li st; d ated M arch 2, 200 7 EC OS Test Re v is io n R esu lts; da ted Jun e 1 6, 2 005 , thro ugh Ja nua ry 19 , 20 07 CA RD 07-210 01; NR C Pre-Insp ecti on Se lf-Asse ssmen t - D ev el op EC OS Trai ni ng; da ted Feb ruary 20 , 20 07 CA RD 07-207 70; NR C Pre-Insp ecti on Se lf-Asse ssmen t - B ackup Au gm enta tio n S y stem Testi ng Ev al uati on; date d F ebru ary 8, 200 7 CA RD 07-206 09; Operati ng Ex peri enc e - Dri v e In A ugmentati on Dri ll Ide nti f ie s Opp ortun iti es f or Improv emen t (D resd en); Feb ruary 1, 200 7 CA RD 06-277 63; No v embe r 29 , 20 06, EC OS P hon e R esp ons e On ly Test Au gm enta tio n W eaknes s; d ated D ece mber 7, 2 006 CA RD 06-260 33; Se ptembe r 16 , 20 06, EC OS P hon e R esp ons e On ly Test Se v eral P rogram an d Au gm enta tio n W eaknes ses; da ted Se ptembe r 18 , 20 06 CA RD 06-219 31; EP-220 D oes N ot R eflect RE RP P la n R P Techni ci an Au gm enta tio n; d ated Ap ril 5, 200 6 Se ction 1E P5: Co rrec tion of E merge ncy P rep are dne ss Weak nes ses Au di t R epo rt 06-010 2; Qua li ty A ssu ranc e A udi t of the Emergenc y P repa redn ess P rogram; da ted M a rc h 2 1 , Au di t R epo rt 05-010 9; Qua li ty A ssu ranc e A udi t of the Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e Pre pare dne ss Pl an; date d J une 28 , 20 05 NA RP-07-0 018; Fo cus ed Se lf-Asse ssmen t - N RC E mergency P repa redn ess Ins pec tio n Re adi nes s; d ated M arch 1, 200 7 NA RP-07-0 013; Qui ck Hi t S el f-Ass ess ment f or E mergency P repa redn ess; da ted Jan uary 24 , 20 07 NA RP-06-0 164; Ju ly 31 , 20 06 Un usu al E v ent De cl arati on; date d A ugust 1 0, 2 006 N A R P-0 5-0 0 5 8; Qu i ck H i t S e l f-A ss e ss me n t - E me rge n cy P re p a re d n e ss P e rfor ma n ce I n d i ca to rs Co mpari son to Indu stry; da ted M ay 12 , 20 05 7

A tt a ch me n t Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted Au gust 9, 200 6 Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted M ay 23 , 20 06 Dri ll an d E x erci se Cri tique S ummary; da ted Jun e 8 , 20 05 CA RD 06-236 30; RE RP D ril l M ay 23 , 20 06 - Fa il ed Objecti v e D ue to In corre ct P rotec tiv e A cti on Re commend ati on; date d M ay 26 , 20 06 CARD 06-20860; Audit Finding - T w o ERO Staf f Augm enta tion Positions Are Not Inc luded As Timed Re spo nse P osi tio ns Du rin g EC OS Tests or ER O Dri ll s a nd Ex erci ses; da ted Feb ruary 17 , 20 06 CA RD 06-203 16; RE RP D ril l Jan uary 18 , 20 06 - Fa il ure of Objecti v e for In iti al N oti f ic ati ons; da ted Jan uary 24 , 20 06 C A R D 0 5-2 5 0 3 2; R E R P D ri l l A u gus t 2 4 , 2 0 0 5 , In a cc u ra cy On A n I n i ti a l N o ti fic a ti o n R e su l ts I n Fai le d D ril l Objecti v e; d ated A ugust 3 1, 2 005 CA RD 05-235 05; RE RP P rogram Re commend ati ons of EC OS; d ated Ju ne 9, 2 005 CA RD 05-235 04; Au di t Fi ndi ng - Tw o R ER P Ass embl y an d A cco unta bi li ty P roce dure s A re N ot Co nsi sten t W ith the R ER P Pl an; date d J une 9, 200 5 CA RD 05-230 09; NR C Vi ol ati on, Ch ange to E mergency P repa redn ess P rogram That D ecre ase d the Eff ecti v ene ss W ith out Pri or N RC A ppro v al; M ay 12 , 20 05 Se ction 1E P6: Drill Ev alua tion RE RP D ril l Pa ckage, Sce nari o 4 2; M arch 21 , 20 07 Dri ll/Ex erci se Cri tique S ummary , S cen ari o 4 2; M arch 21 , 20 07 2OS3 R adia tion Monito ring Ins trumen tation an d Pro tectiv e E quip ment Fermi 2 Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P repa redn ess P la n; R ev is io n 3 1 Fermi 2 Techni cal R equi rements M anu al; R ev is io n 8 3 Fermi 2 TSs; TS Ba ses an d L ic ens e A mend ments 134 an d 1 59 Fermi 2 Up date d F in al S afety A nal y si s R epo rt; C hap ters 11 and 12; M ul tip le R ev is io ns Fermi 2 Ra di ati on Pro tecti on Instru ment Da il y an d W eekly C hec k Li sts; v ari ous da tes 200 6 and 20 07 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.301; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel F unc tio nal Test; R ev is io n 3 1 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.302; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 6 Ca li brati on;Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.303; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 15 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.304; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 16 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.080.305; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel 17 Ca li brati on; Re v is io n 0 9 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 64.611.504; A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng Sy stem C han nel s 1-5, 7-14 and 18-48 Ca li brati on/F unc tio nal Test; R ev is io n 1 4 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.228; Opera tio n o f the R adi ati on Pro tecti on Out-of-Serv ic e Pro gram; Rev is io n 5 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.242; C al ib rati on of NN C Gamma 60 P ortal M oni tor; R ev is io n 3 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.247; C al ib rati on Re cord s o f IP M 9D M oni tor N os. 299 an d 3 03;date d S epte mber 200 6; a nd Pro ced ure Re v is io ns 2 a nd 3 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.304; V eri f ic ati on of Gamma Ca li brato r D ose R ates; R ev is io n 6 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 66.000.245; C al ib rati on of the NE S mal l Arti cl es M oni tor; R ev is io n 3 8

A tt a ch me n t Sy stem H eal th R epo rts; P roce ss and A rea Ra di ati on M oni tori ng; da ted 200 5 a nd 200 6 NN C Ca li brati on Da ta F orms; In strumen t N os. 960 060 an d 9 702 65; date d Octo ber 5 a nd 6, 2 006 , res pect iv ely Do si tec AR-20 Ca li brati on Form; Instru ment No. 30 245; da ted Se ptembe r 09 , 20 05 AM P-1 00 Ca li brati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 5 001-050 an d 5 002-077; da ted Ap ril 26 , 20 05, and Oc tobe r 10, 2005, re spect iv ely AM S-4 C al ib rati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 4 39, 439 , 19 39 and 19 40; date d M ay 20 05, November 2006, June 2005 , and Sept em ber 2006 , res pect iv ely IPM 9D C al ib rati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 2 98; date d M ay 13 , 20 05 P l a n t T e c h n i c a l P r o c e d u r e s 6 4.1 2 0.0 4 0 a n d 6 4.1 2 0.0 4 1; C o n t a i n me n t A r e a H i gh R a n ge Ra di ati on M oni tor D iv is io n I and D iv is io n II Ca li brati on Da ta; d ated A pri l 200 0 a nd Feb ruary 20 06 and as soc ia ted proc edu re R ev is io n 1 0 a nd 14 Ra dca l Co rpora tio n C al ib rati on Re port; M ode l 202 5A C Ra di ati on M oni tor (N o. 4 007) w ith M ode l 20X5-3 (N o. 2 113 5), M ode l 20X5-1 80 (No. 74 98), and M ode l 20X5-1 800 (N o. 9 959) Ion Ch ambe rs; d ated Ju ly 20 05 and M ay 20 06 SA M-11 Ca li brati on Forms; Instru ment No s. 3 10 and 31 1; d ated Octob er 2 , 20 06 AB AC OS H el geson Sta ndu p C oun tin g Sy stem C al ib rati on Re cord s; d ated N ov embe r 20 05 and No v embe r 20 06 Sca li ng Fa ctor Re port and A sso ci ated A nal y si s R esu lts; da ted Octobe r 20 05 and F ebru ary 20 07 CARD 05-21929; OE - Perr y - Area Radiation M onitor Low Lev el Set Point To o High to Ef f ect iv ely No tify of Ra di ati on Lev el C han ges; da ted M arch 23 , 20 05 CA RD 06-222 72; Fri sker Fa il ed So urce C hec k; dated A pri l 12, 200 6 CA RD 06-249 42; RP P rogram En han cemen t - D ry w el l Ini tia l En try; da ted Jul y 31 , 20 06 CA RD 07-200 68; AR M A la rm Du rin g Pumpi ng of W aste C ol le ctor Tank; date d J anu ary 05 , 20 07 CA RD 07-201 18; Ev al uate Trend of Are a R adi ati on Are a A la rm Occurre nce s for C ommona li tie s;date d J anu ary 09 , 20 07 CA RD 07-216 16; NR C Co nce rn R egardi ng CH RR M S Ca li brati on; date d M arch 22 , 20 07 Nu cl ear Qual ity A ssu ranc e A udi t R epo rt 05-011 3; d ated N ov embe r 11 , 20 05 Fermi 2 Genera l Ad min is trati on Co ndu ct M anu al M GA13 - Fermi M edi cal R equi rements;Re v is io n 1 3 Fermi 2 Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y Team R oste rs M atri x; da ted M arch 20 07 Fermi 2 Re spi ratory P rotec tio n Qu al ifica tio n M atri x; da ted M arch 20 07 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s M ai nten anc e a nd Insp ecti on Logs; s el ecte d d ates Ju ne 200 5- M arch 20 07 Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s In v ento ry; da ted M arch 22 , 20 07 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.707; Ins pec tio n o f M SA R esp ira tory E quip ment; R ev is io n 1 0 Pl ant Techni cal P roce dure 65.000.736; Opera tio n o f The Bre athi ng Ai r C ompres sors; R ev is io n 7 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 100; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Ai rborn e A rea W ork Co ntrol s a nd De v ic es; Re v is io n 5 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 200; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s;Re v is io n 2 Les son P la n N o. L P-GN-5 09-0 300; R esp ira tory P rotec tio n - Se lf-Con tai ned B reath in g App aratu s and E mergency B reath in g Ai r; R ev is io n 4 M i n e S a fe t y A p p l i a n c e C e r t i fi c a t e s f o r S e l e c t M e m b e r s o f t h e R a d i a t i o n P r o t e c t i o n S t a ff;Feb ruary 20 06 Se ction 4OA 1: Pe rforman ce Indic ator V erifica tion (711 51)CA RD 07-206 58; Temperatu re In crea se in the D W E quip ment Su mp; d ated 02/03/2 007 CA RD 07-206 59; DW E quip ment Su mp Tempera ture Indi cati ng Hi gher Than E x pec ted in the M CR; da ted 02/0 3/20 07 9

A tt a ch me n t CA RD 07-206 62; Su spe ct V al v e N ot F ul ly C lo si ng on D eman d from Re ci rcul ati on;date d 0 2/04/200 7 CA RD 07-207 08; G1154-F01 8, D W E quip D rn S ump Inbd C ntm Iso V lv , Thermal Ov erl oad Trip;date d 0 2/06/200 7 Drawing 6I7 21-2 251-3; R/W Sy s-Dr yw ell Eq uipme nt Dra in Sump 71 Pump G I101-C006 A;Re v is io n N , da ted 09/2 3/92 Dra w in g 6I72 1-22 51-4 0; R/W S y s D ry w el l Equi p D rai n S ump Re ci rc & D is ch Va lv es G1154 F01 5 and F 018; R ev is io n Y , da ted 03/0 3/03 D ra w i n g 6 I7 2 1-2 2 5 5-1 0; R a d w a st e S y st e m I n st ru me n t L o o p P a rt 4 Dry w el l Equi pmen t D rai n S ump Temperatu re 0 2/04-19/2 007; R ev is io n V , 05/03/2 006 EP-540; D ril ls an d E x erci ses; R ev is io n 2 6 EP-540 , E ncl osu re E; N RC P erformance Indi cato rs - Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P la n;date d F ebru ary 22 , 20 06 Re cord s o f D EP Ind ic ator Opportu ni tie s; d ated A pri l 200 6 th rough De cembe r 20 06 Re cord s o f K ey E RO D ril l and E x erci se Pa rtic ip ati on; date d A pri l 200 6 th rough De cembe r 20 06 Re cord s o f A NS S ire n Tes t R esu lts; da ted Ap ril 20 06 throu gh De cembe r 20 06 S e c ti o n 4 OA 2: I d e n ti fi c a ti o n a n d R e s o lu ti o n o f P ro b le ms (71 152)CA RD 07-205 10; M ai nten anc e P erformed o n W rong E quip ment; d ated 01/29/2 007 CA RD 07-205 90; Co mmon C aus e A nal y si s o n S el ect CA RD s; d ated 01/13/2 007 CA RD 07-206 95; Su ppl emen tal P erso nne l W orking o n E quip ment W ith out Pro per Pro tecti on Order; d ated 02/05/2 007 CA RD 07-207 81; Un pl ann ed En try i nto TS 3.8.7; d ated 02/08/2 007 CA RD 07-207 85; Va lv es Fou nd Out of Po si tio n D uri ng Pa nel W al kdow n; d ated 02/12/2 007 C A R D 0 7-2 0 8 5 7; P e rfor m a C o mmo n C a u se A n a l y si s o n S ta ti o n "W o rk Q u a l i ty";date d 0 2/13/200 7 CA RD 07-209 27; Fai lu re to P roce ss an LC R f or E mergency Ope rati ons F aci li ty U pgrade;date d 0 2/16/200 7 CA RD 07-210 69; Co mmuni cati on Up grade No tifica tio n; d ated 02/23/2 007 CARD 07-21083; Lack of Enginee ring Ev aluation Prior to Comm encing M odif ication of the EOD Fac il ity; da ted 02/2 3/20 07 CA RD 07-211 74; P&ID -222 3 C onfigurati on Co ntrol Iss ue; date d 0 2/28/200 7 CA RD 07-211 96; W ork Re quest R el eas ed and W orking W ith out Ad equate Pro tecti on;date d 0 2/28/200 7 CA RD 07-215 19; Ad v erse P erformance Trend Iden tifie d i n M ai nten anc e; d ated 03/15/2 007 C A R D 0 7-2 1 6 5 2; M i ss e d R e p l a ce me n t o f R e l a y , C a u se d P e rfor ma n ce o f S u rv e i l l a n ce Tw o E x tr a Times; date d 0 3/23/200 7 Co mmon C aus e A nal y si s R epo rt for CA RD 07-205 90; date d M arch 28 , 20 07 Fermi 2 Sta tio n Qu arterl y Trend R epo rt, 4 Qua rter (Octo ber thru De cembe r) 20 06 th Lea der Bri ef by K ev in H la v aty; da ted 02/0 7/20 07 Li cen si ng Ch ange Re quest D SN; M LS 080 01; Re f le ct th e c han ge to the Emergenc y Ope rati ons Fac il ity (E OF) F lo or P la n; R ev is io n 9 , da ted 02/2 3/20 07 M EM O NA NT-07, 01/2 2/20 07; De cembe r P erformance Trendi ng Re sul ts; d ated 01/22/2 007 M LS 14; Ch anges, Tests a nd Ex peri ments; Re v is io n 6 M LS A ppe ndi x B; A ppl ic abi li ty D etermi nati on M anu al; R ev is io n 8 M LS 140 02; 50.5 9 S cree n; R ev is io n 5 M LS 140 03; 50.5 9 E v al uati on; Re v is io n 2 R o o t C a u se D e te rmi n a ti o n for C A R D 0 7-2 0 5 1 0; M a i n te n a n ce P e rfor me d o n W ro n g E qui p me n t;date d 0 2/16/200 7 1 0 A tt a ch me n t Se ction 4OA 5: Other A ctiv ities (71 153)CA RD 07-207 33; Fai le d S eal on S outh R W CU R eci rc P ump B; date d 0 2/06/200 7 CA RD 07-211 98; PM T Fai lu re - Ab normal N oi se and S ubs equen t S/D of Sou th R W CU P ump;date d 0 2/28/200 7 Operato r Lo g; 02/06/200 7 to 02/08/2 007 R e v i se d C D F R i sk P ro fil e for t h e W e e k o f 2/2 6 t o 3/5 Ri sk M ana gement P la n; R W CU Le ak Iden tifica tio n, Is ol ati on, and S y stem R esto rati on; date d 02/0 6/20 07 Tro u b l e sh o o ti n g D a ta S h e e t, C A R D 0 7-2 0 7 3 3 , G3 3 0 3 C 0 0 1 B , S o u th R W C U P u mp 1 1 A tt a ch me n tLIST OF A CRONYM S USED AD AM S Agenc y w id e D ocu ments Acc ess an d M ana gement S y stem AN S Al ert a nd No tifica tio n S y stem AR M Are a R adi ati on M oni tor CA RD Co ndi tio n A sse ssmen t R eso lu tio n D ocu ment CF R Co de of Fed eral R egul ati ons CS T Co nde nsa te S torage Tank D R P D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r P ro je ct s D R S D i v i si o n o f R e a ct o r S a fety EC OS Emergenc y C al l Out S y stem ED G Emergenc y D ie sel Gen erato r E OF E me rge n cy Op e ra ti o n s F a ci l i ty A E OF A l te rn a te E me rge n cy Op e ra ti o n s F a ci l i ty EP Emergenc y P repa redn ess ER O Emergenc y R esp ons e Organi z ati on HP CI Hi gh Pre ssu re C ool ant Injecti on HV AC He ati ng, Ve nti la tio n, a nd Ai r C ond iti oni ng IM C Insp ecti on M anu al C hap ter L E R L i ce n se e E v e n t R e p o rt M CC M otor Co ntrol C ente r MOV Mot or O pe r at ed Val ve N O S N u c l e a r O v e r s i g h t S t a ff NC V No n C ite d V io la tio n NR C Nu cl ear Re gula tory C ommis si on NR R Of f ic e o f N ucl ear Re acto r R egul ati on P A R S P u b l i c A v a i l a b i l i ty R e co rd PI Pe rf ormanc e In di cato r PM T Po st-M ai nten anc e Tes tin g RC IC Re acto r C ore Isol ati on Co ol in g RC S Re acto r C ool ant Sy stem RE RP Ra di ol ogica l Emergenc y R esp ons e P repa redn ess RH R Re si dua l He at R emov al R IS R e gul a to ry I n form a ti o n S u mma ry ROC Re gion al Ope rati ons C ente r RP Ra di ati on Pro tecti on RW CU Re acto r W ater Cl ean up SA M Smal l Arti cl es M oni tor SD P Si gnifica nce D etermi nati on Pro ces s TM I Three M il e Is la nd TS Techni cal S pec ifica tio ns U F S A R U p d a te d F i n a l S a fety A n a l y si s R e p o rt UR I Un reso lv ed Item W R W ork Re quest

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000341/2007002&oldid=1130870"