ML14364A350: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/21/2014 | | issue date = 11/21/2014 | ||
| title = 2014 Braidwood Station Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | | title = 2014 Braidwood Station Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2 | ||
| author name = | | author name = Mcneil D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Revision as of 04:39, 21 June 2019
| ML14364A350 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood |
| Issue date: | 11/21/2014 |
| From: | Mcneil D NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14344A990 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-201-2 50-456/OL-14, 50-457/OL-14 | |
| Download: ML14364A350 (1) | |
Text
E S-201 E x a mina t ion Outline Q ua li ty Checklist Form E S-2 0 1-2 Facil ity: Da t e of Examinat i on: In itials Item Task Descr i ption b. c;# a 1. a. Verify that the outl in e (s) fit (s) the approp ri ate model , in a ccord an ce with ES-401. 1 {l-ffJ, w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with /1 Al I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems , evolutions , or gener i c topics. /1 iCh 14. T E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropr i ate. ;1 l fl" '11'1 N 2. a. Using Form ES-30 1-5 , verify that the proposed scenario sets c over the required number !\ of normal e volutio ns , i nstr ume n t and component fa ilur es , tec hni cal specifi cat io ns , 'b.-s and major transients. I M b. Assess whether th e re are en ough scen ario se ts (and spa r es) to test the projected number u and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule !\ L without compromising exam integrity , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A at least one new or significant l y modified scenario , that no scenarios are duplicated T from the applicants
' audit test(s). and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 c. To the extent possible , assess whether the outline(s) conform (s) with the qualitative
- i R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendi x D. 3. a. Ve r ify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Fo rm ES-30 1-2
- (1) the o u t l ine(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form ;.._ I (2) ta sk r epet iti o n fr om the las t two NRC examin ati ons is within the limit s specified on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applica n ts' audit test(s) (4) the number of ne w or modified tasks meets or exceeds the m i ni mu ms specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path , low-power , emergency , and RCA tasks m e et the c riteria on the form. b. V eri fy that the administrative outline meets the c riter i a sp ec ified on Fo rm ES-301-1: (1) th e tasks are d i stributed a mong th e top ic s as sp eci fi e d on th e form A at least one task i s new or s i gnificantly modified no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC lice nsi ng exami nations c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the p roje cted n umbe r a nd mix '\ Ill'-of a ppl i c ants a nd ensure that no i tem s a re duplicated on subsequent day s. 4. a. Assess wh ether plant-specific prio ri ti es (i n clu d ing PRA and I PE i nsights) are co v ered t1 in the ap p ropriate exa m sections. G b. Assess wh e the r the 10 CFR 55.4 1/4 3 and 55.4 5 sam p l ing is appropriate. A E N C. Ensure t h at KIA im portance rat ings (exce pt for plant-specific priorit ie s) are at least 2.5. A N-E d. C heck for dupli ca t i on a nd overlap a m ong exam s e ctions. A R A e. Chec k the entire exam for balance of co ver age. j\ L t-/ f. Assess wheth er the exa m fi t s the appropriate job l evel (RO or SRO). 1\ ' a. Author "JA e-1 N_/?e/SJwS'/UU COG f_t U3
/1 I ( 6 llf b. Fac ility Reviewe r (*) ... J.-.t . ..,.-f-'/.oJ-.-p_
//h. ./ 7P'f}l'( c. NR C Chief Examiner (#) _6 1 f"\1'-*.,FJ.:t.
.711-'lt.----' 5{JIBPJ j:J,;.f pp /': ..1!'£...,?. d. NRC Supervisor f y ' , Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Co lumn " c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not app li ca bl e for NR C-prepared examination outlines ES-201, Page 26 of 28