ML14280A074: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form Quality Checklist 0 Facility: DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In... Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Item Description 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*) H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14 __ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}} | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form Quality Checklist 0 | ||
Facility: | |||
DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In... | |||
Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Item Description | |||
: 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented | |||
: 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) | |||
: 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, | |||
+/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified | |||
: 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*) | |||
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*) | |||
D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*) | |||
H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14 | |||
__ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}} | |||
Revision as of 08:57, 1 July 2018
| ML14280A074 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/20/2014 |
| From: | McNeil D R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | American Electric Power, Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13093A427 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-315/14-301, 50-316/14-301 50-315/OL-14, 50-316/OL-14 | |
| Download: ML14280A074 (1) | |
Text
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form Quality Checklist 0
Facility:
DC Cook U1/U2 Date of Exam: -e8t(Hfl2tH4-*In...
Exam Level: RO L2J SRO 0 Item Description
- 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading 2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
- 3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
- 4. Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable,
+/-4% on the reviewed in detail 5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
- 6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed b half or more of the a licants a. Grader b. Facility Reviewer(*)
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
D. McNeil/ NRC Supervisor(*)
H. Peterson a n/a n/a Initials b c n/a n/a n/a n/a rJ/tt Date 08/12/14
__ .n@_ 08/12/14 The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.