ML20138C198: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20138C198 | |||
| issue date = 02/26/1986 | |||
| title = Insp Repts 50-324/86-04 & 50-325/86-03 on 860121-24. Violation Noted:Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills & Training & Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013 | |||
| author name = Conlon T, Wiseman G | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) | |||
| addressee name = | |||
| addressee affiliation = | |||
| docket = 05000324, 05000325 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = 50-324-86-04, 50-324-86-4, 50-325-86-03, 50-325-86-3, NUDOCS 8604020392 | |||
| package number = ML20138C162 | |||
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS | |||
| page count = 6 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000324/1986004]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | |||
UNITED STATES | |||
j,a E e * | |||
* | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON | |||
c | |||
REGION 11 | |||
y | |||
,j | |||
101 MARIETTA STREET N.W. | |||
* | |||
's | |||
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323 | |||
%...../ | |||
Report Nos.: 50-325/86-03 and 50-324/86-04 | |||
Licensee: | |||
Carolina Power and Light Company | |||
P. O. Box 1551 | |||
Raleigh, NC 27602 | |||
Docket Nos.: 50-325 and 50-324 | |||
License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62 | |||
Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2 | |||
Inspection Conducted: January 21-24, 1986 | |||
k/l$Y, , . | |||
2 f"2 Er ) T(o | |||
Inspector: | |||
w | |||
G. R. Wi s ema n' ' | |||
' / | |||
M te Sighed | |||
Approved by: | |||
ku | |||
.N)M/b | |||
T. Ef Eoniori, Sectionfhief- | |||
Oate Sfgned | |||
Plant Systems Section, Engineering Branch | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
SUMMARY | |||
Scope: | |||
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 26 inspector-hours on site | |||
i | |||
in the areas of Fire Protection / Prevention and followup on previously identified | |||
inspection items. | |||
-Results: | |||
Two apparent violations were identified - Inadequate Fire Brigade | |||
Drills and Training - paragraph 5.b. and Failure to Implement Fire Protection | |||
Procedures FPP-013 - paragraph 6.a. | |||
8604020392 860324 | |||
PDR | |||
ADOCM 05000324 | |||
G | |||
PDR | |||
_s | |||
a | |||
i | |||
' | |||
. | |||
REPORT DETAILS | |||
1. | |||
' Persons Contacted | |||
Licensee Employees | |||
*E. A. Bishop, Manager Operations | |||
*J. W. Chase, Assistant to General Manager | |||
*C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager | |||
*C. E. Enzor, Director Regulatory Compliance | |||
*R. J. Groover, Manager, Brunswick Construction Unit | |||
*J. R. Holder, Outage Manager | |||
*B. L. Parks, Engineering Supervisor | |||
*R. E. Porterfield, Senior Engineer - Fire Protection | |||
*R. M. Poulk, Jr., Senior Specialist - Regulatory Compliance | |||
A. Spencer, Training Specialist | |||
*J. D. Wilcox, Principal Engineer-0perations | |||
*T. H. Wyllie, Manager, Engineering and Construction | |||
Other licensee employees contacted included construction craf tsinen, | |||
engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and | |||
office personnel. | |||
Other Organizations | |||
R. E. Deacy, Fire Protection Engineer, Impell Corporation | |||
NRC Resident Inspectors | |||
'*W. H. Ruland | |||
*L. Garner | |||
* Attended exit interview | |||
2. | |||
Exit Interview | |||
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 24, 1986, with | |||
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. | |||
The inspector described the | |||
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings. | |||
No | |||
dissenting comments were received from the licensee. | |||
a. | |||
ViolationItem(324/86-04-01and325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade | |||
Drills and Training - parag' .2ph 5.b. | |||
b. | |||
Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and 325/86-03-01), Failure to Implement | |||
Fire Protection Procedures FPP-013,' paragraph 6. | |||
The licensee did not identify-as proprietary any of the materials provided | |||
to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection. | |||
1 | |||
. - - - - _ - - - - . . . - . - . - - _ _ _ , . . _ _ . _ . . | |||
- | |||
. | |||
2 | |||
3. | |||
Licensee' Action on Previous Enforcement Matters | |||
(Closed) Unresolved Item -(324/84-37-02 and 325/84-37-02), Surveillance | |||
Requirements of the Fire / Flame Impingement Barrier for Fire Pumps. Section | |||
7.8 of Surveillance Procedure PT-34.6.7.2, Revision 1, has been revised to | |||
include an' inspection of the fire / flame impingement barrier for the fire | |||
pumps on a 18-month frequency. | |||
4. | |||
Unresolved Items | |||
Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection. | |||
5. | |||
Fire Protection Prevention Program (64703) | |||
a. | |||
Fire Prevention / Administrative Controls Procedures | |||
The inspector ' reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative | |||
Proced res: | |||
Procedure No. | |||
Title | |||
FPP-003 | |||
Fire Brigade Training | |||
FPP-004 | |||
Fire Brigade Personnel Medical | |||
-and Physical Qualifications | |||
FPP-007 | |||
Control | |||
and Use of Fire | |||
Fighting Equipment | |||
FPP-013 | |||
Weekly Fire Inspection and | |||
Plant Housekeeping | |||
FPP-014 | |||
Control of . Combustibles - and | |||
Transient Loads | |||
FPP-017 | |||
Control of Cutting, Welding and | |||
Grinding | |||
PFP-001 | |||
Pre-Fire Control Procedure | |||
PFP-013 | |||
General Fire Plan | |||
Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC | |||
Guidelines of: | |||
(1) The docurnent entitled " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection functional | |||
Responsibilities, Administrative Controls, and Quality Assurance" | |||
dated June 1977. | |||
(2) 10 CFR 50 Appendix R - Fire Protection Programs for Nuclear Power | |||
Facilities. | |||
, | |||
- | |||
. | |||
3 | |||
b. | |||
Fire Brigade | |||
(1) Organizations- | |||
The plant fire brigade is composed of six shifts of fully dedi- | |||
cated fire brigade personnel. The fire brigade leader is normally | |||
a Senior Reactor Operator and the remaining fire brigade members | |||
are composed of Auxiliary Operators and a radwaste representative. | |||
The inspector reviewed the on-shift " fire brigade roster" for the | |||
dates January 8,1986 through January 22, 1986, and verified that a | |||
sufficient number of fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet | |||
the provisions of Technical Specification 6.2.2 for fire brigade | |||
operations and for plant operation. | |||
(2) Training | |||
The inspector reviewed the training records for six brigade Fire | |||
Chiefs and 13 fire brigade members assigned duty during the above | |||
period and found that four of the fire brigade members had not | |||
completed all quarterly fire brigade training and one brigade. | |||
member had not participated in the number of fire drills required | |||
by procedure FPP-003. | |||
This is identified as Violation Item | |||
(324/86-04-01 and 325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills | |||
and Training. | |||
A sample of the records of the annual physical | |||
examinations and respirator training for the brigade members | |||
required by procedure FPP-004 were reviewed and found satisfac- | |||
tory. | |||
(3) Fire Brigade Equipment | |||
The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equip- | |||
ment, consisting of fire hose, nozzles, tools, and miscellaneous | |||
equipment, stored at the fire brigade equipment response location | |||
located at the south fire equipment house. | |||
A total of 17 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helmets etc.), | |||
17 sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 38 spare air | |||
cylinders are available. | |||
Ten sets are located adjacent .to the | |||
main centrol room; two sets are in the radwaste control room; and | |||
five_ sets are at the south fire equipment house. | |||
Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment | |||
stored at the fire brigade equipment response locations appeared | |||
to be properly maintained and stored in a ready condition. | |||
Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi- | |||
fied within the areas inspected. | |||
I | |||
_ | |||
- | |||
. | |||
4 | |||
6 .' | |||
Fire Protection / Prevention Program Implementation (64704) | |||
Plant Tours | |||
Plant tours were made by the inspector on both day and night shifts. At the | |||
time of the inspections Unit I was in full operation.and Unit 2 was in an | |||
extended outage. | |||
During the plant tours portions of the following plant | |||
areas.and .their related fire protection features were inspected: | |||
Diesel Generator Building - 2', | |||
23', and 50' elevations | |||
Service Water Building - 4', | |||
20' elevations | |||
Reactor Building Unit 2 - (-)17', 20' and 50' elevations | |||
Reactor Building Unit 1 - 20' - 50' Elevations and Refueling Floor Control | |||
Building - 23' and 49' elevations | |||
The inspector visually inspected the fire / smoke detection capabilities, and | |||
the manual firefighting equipment (i.e., portable extinguishers, hose | |||
stations, etc.) and the fire barrier walls associated with the above plant | |||
areas. | |||
Based on the visual inspection, it appears that the fire protection features | |||
associated with the above plant areas were properly maintained and fully | |||
functional, except that a number of fire doors in the diesel generator | |||
building were not in service. However, the licensee had established the LCO | |||
requirements of the Technical Specifications for these areas. | |||
The plant tours also reviewed the licensee's implementation of the fire | |||
protection administrative procedures. | |||
On January 22, 1986, the inspector | |||
and the Brunswick plant Fire Protection Engineer accompanied members of the | |||
- | |||
Fire Protection Support group during their conduction of a weekly fire | |||
inspection per the criteria of procedures FPP-013 and .FPP-014 of the Service | |||
Water Building and Diesel Generator Building. | |||
During this walkthrough the | |||
inspector observed a non fire-retardant wood crate, combustible cardboard | |||
and rubber gasketing material associated with Unit 2 maintenance work which | |||
had obstructed fire protection equipment in the Unit 1 area of the Service | |||
Water Building. | |||
Also identified was flammable oil accumulations on the | |||
floor, conduits and cable trays within the 2' elevation of the diesel | |||
generator building. | |||
These conditions were reported to the licensee. | |||
The | |||
licensee's fire protection support group inspector during this walkthrough | |||
did not identify or note any of these conditions on the FPP-013 checklist. | |||
FPP-013 requires the inspectors to note any identified condition which could | |||
adversely affect the fire protection status of the area. | |||
Failure to | |||
identify, and not correct the above mentioned conditions which are adverse | |||
to the fire protection of the area is considered a faihre to implement | |||
FPP-013. | |||
This constitutes a violation of Technical Specification 6.8.1.f, | |||
which requires that written procedures for the fire protection program be | |||
implemented and is identified as Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and | |||
325/86-03-02), Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013. | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
5 | |||
Several _ welding operations were observed in the Unit-2 reactor building | |||
during outage maintenance activities. | |||
An approved " Hot Work" permit had | |||
been issued for the welding sites and the operations and fire prevention / | |||
protection practices generally met the licensee's fire prevention procedure | |||
requirements. | |||
The general housekeeping as a whole had deteriorated somewhat since the last | |||
NRC fire protection . inspection. | |||
This can be contributed to the Unit 2 | |||
outage activities and the licensee's failure to identify and correct adverse | |||
housekeeping practices as identified _ by above Violation Item 324/86-04-02 | |||
and 325/86-03-02. | |||
Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi- | |||
fied within the areas inspected. | |||
7. | |||
Inspector Followup Items | |||
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item, (324/84-37-01 and 325/84-37-01), Surveil- | |||
lance Testing for Eight Hour Battery Powered Emergency Lighting Units. | |||
Procedure PT-34.15.9.1 Revision 0, was issued on November 13, 1985, to | |||
provide semiannual physical inspection and lighting head positioning for all | |||
Appendix R Emergency Lighting . Units. | |||
In addition, this procedure provides | |||
for an 18-month battery capacity 8-hour discharge test for a 10% sample of | |||
the emergency lighting units. The scope of testing and schedule provided in | |||
the procedure appear acceptable. | |||
1 | |||
, | |||
_ | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 24 May 2025
| ML20138C198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1986 |
| From: | Conlon T, Wiseman G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138C162 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-324-86-04, 50-324-86-4, 50-325-86-03, 50-325-86-3, NUDOCS 8604020392 | |
| Download: ML20138C198 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000324/1986004
Text
.
UNITED STATES
j,a E e *
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON
c
REGION 11
y
,j
101 MARIETTA STREET N.W.
's
ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323
%...../
Report Nos.: 50-325/86-03 and 50-324/86-04
Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company
P. O. Box 1551
Raleigh, NC 27602
Docket Nos.: 50-325 and 50-324
License Nos.: DPR-71 and DPR-62
Facility Name: Brunswick 1 and 2
Inspection Conducted: January 21-24, 1986
k/l$Y, , .
2 f"2 Er ) T(o
Inspector:
w
G. R. Wi s ema n' '
' /
M te Sighed
Approved by:
ku
.N)M/b
T. Ef Eoniori, Sectionfhief-
Oate Sfgned
Plant Systems Section, Engineering Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY
Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 26 inspector-hours on site
i
in the areas of Fire Protection / Prevention and followup on previously identified
inspection items.
-Results:
Two apparent violations were identified - Inadequate Fire Brigade
Drills and Training - paragraph 5.b. and Failure to Implement Fire Protection
Procedures FPP-013 - paragraph 6.a.
8604020392 860324
ADOCM 05000324
G
_s
a
i
'
.
REPORT DETAILS
1.
' Persons Contacted
Licensee Employees
- E. A. Bishop, Manager Operations
- J. W. Chase, Assistant to General Manager
- C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager
- C. E. Enzor, Director Regulatory Compliance
- R. J. Groover, Manager, Brunswick Construction Unit
- J. R. Holder, Outage Manager
- B. L. Parks, Engineering Supervisor
- R. E. Porterfield, Senior Engineer - Fire Protection
- R. M. Poulk, Jr., Senior Specialist - Regulatory Compliance
A. Spencer, Training Specialist
- J. D. Wilcox, Principal Engineer-0perations
- T. H. Wyllie, Manager, Engineering and Construction
Other licensee employees contacted included construction craf tsinen,
engineers, technicians, operators, mechanics, security force members, and
office personnel.
Other Organizations
R. E. Deacy, Fire Protection Engineer, Impell Corporation
NRC Resident Inspectors
'*W. H. Ruland
- L. Garner
- Attended exit interview
2.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on January 24, 1986, with
those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above.
The inspector described the
areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection findings.
No
dissenting comments were received from the licensee.
a.
ViolationItem(324/86-04-01and325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade
Drills and Training - parag' .2ph 5.b.
b.
Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and 325/86-03-01), Failure to Implement
Fire Protection Procedures FPP-013,' paragraph 6.
The licensee did not identify-as proprietary any of the materials provided
to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.
1
. - - - - _ - - - - . . . - . - . - - _ _ _ , . . _ _ . _ . .
-
.
2
3.
Licensee' Action on Previous Enforcement Matters
(Closed) Unresolved Item -(324/84-37-02 and 325/84-37-02), Surveillance
Requirements of the Fire / Flame Impingement Barrier for Fire Pumps. Section
7.8 of Surveillance Procedure PT-34.6.7.2, Revision 1, has been revised to
include an' inspection of the fire / flame impingement barrier for the fire
pumps on a 18-month frequency.
4.
Unresolved Items
Unresolved items were not identified during the inspection.
5.
Fire Protection Prevention Program (64703)
a.
Fire Prevention / Administrative Controls Procedures
The inspector ' reviewed the following Fire Prevention / Administrative
Proced res:
Procedure No.
Title
Fire Brigade Training
Fire Brigade Personnel Medical
-and Physical Qualifications
Control
and Use of Fire
Fighting Equipment
Weekly Fire Inspection and
Plant Housekeeping
Control of . Combustibles - and
Transient Loads
Control of Cutting, Welding and
Grinding
Pre-Fire Control Procedure
General Fire Plan
Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC
Guidelines of:
(1) The docurnent entitled " Nuclear Plant Fire Protection functional
Responsibilities, Administrative Controls, and Quality Assurance"
dated June 1977.
(2) 10 CFR 50 Appendix R - Fire Protection Programs for Nuclear Power
Facilities.
,
-
.
3
b.
Fire Brigade
(1) Organizations-
The plant fire brigade is composed of six shifts of fully dedi-
cated fire brigade personnel. The fire brigade leader is normally
a Senior Reactor Operator and the remaining fire brigade members
are composed of Auxiliary Operators and a radwaste representative.
The inspector reviewed the on-shift " fire brigade roster" for the
dates January 8,1986 through January 22, 1986, and verified that a
sufficient number of fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet
the provisions of Technical Specification 6.2.2 for fire brigade
operations and for plant operation.
(2) Training
The inspector reviewed the training records for six brigade Fire
Chiefs and 13 fire brigade members assigned duty during the above
period and found that four of the fire brigade members had not
completed all quarterly fire brigade training and one brigade.
member had not participated in the number of fire drills required
by procedure FPP-003.
This is identified as Violation Item
(324/86-04-01 and 325/86-03-01), Inadequate Fire Brigade Drills
and Training.
A sample of the records of the annual physical
examinations and respirator training for the brigade members
required by procedure FPP-004 were reviewed and found satisfac-
tory.
(3) Fire Brigade Equipment
The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equip-
ment, consisting of fire hose, nozzles, tools, and miscellaneous
equipment, stored at the fire brigade equipment response location
located at the south fire equipment house.
A total of 17 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helmets etc.),
17 sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 38 spare air
cylinders are available.
Ten sets are located adjacent .to the
main centrol room; two sets are in the radwaste control room; and
five_ sets are at the south fire equipment house.
Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment
stored at the fire brigade equipment response locations appeared
to be properly maintained and stored in a ready condition.
Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-
fied within the areas inspected.
I
_
-
.
4
6 .'
Fire Protection / Prevention Program Implementation (64704)
Plant Tours
Plant tours were made by the inspector on both day and night shifts. At the
time of the inspections Unit I was in full operation.and Unit 2 was in an
extended outage.
During the plant tours portions of the following plant
areas.and .their related fire protection features were inspected:
Diesel Generator Building - 2',
23', and 50' elevations
Service Water Building - 4',
20' elevations
Reactor Building Unit 2 - (-)17', 20' and 50' elevations
Reactor Building Unit 1 - 20' - 50' Elevations and Refueling Floor Control
Building - 23' and 49' elevations
The inspector visually inspected the fire / smoke detection capabilities, and
the manual firefighting equipment (i.e., portable extinguishers, hose
stations, etc.) and the fire barrier walls associated with the above plant
areas.
Based on the visual inspection, it appears that the fire protection features
associated with the above plant areas were properly maintained and fully
functional, except that a number of fire doors in the diesel generator
building were not in service. However, the licensee had established the LCO
requirements of the Technical Specifications for these areas.
The plant tours also reviewed the licensee's implementation of the fire
protection administrative procedures.
On January 22, 1986, the inspector
and the Brunswick plant Fire Protection Engineer accompanied members of the
-
Fire Protection Support group during their conduction of a weekly fire
inspection per the criteria of procedures FPP-013 and .FPP-014 of the Service
Water Building and Diesel Generator Building.
During this walkthrough the
inspector observed a non fire-retardant wood crate, combustible cardboard
and rubber gasketing material associated with Unit 2 maintenance work which
had obstructed fire protection equipment in the Unit 1 area of the Service
Water Building.
Also identified was flammable oil accumulations on the
floor, conduits and cable trays within the 2' elevation of the diesel
generator building.
These conditions were reported to the licensee.
The
licensee's fire protection support group inspector during this walkthrough
did not identify or note any of these conditions on the FPP-013 checklist.
FPP-013 requires the inspectors to note any identified condition which could
adversely affect the fire protection status of the area.
Failure to
identify, and not correct the above mentioned conditions which are adverse
to the fire protection of the area is considered a faihre to implement
This constitutes a violation of Technical Specification 6.8.1.f,
which requires that written procedures for the fire protection program be
implemented and is identified as Violation Item (324/86-04-02 and
325/86-03-02), Failure to Implement Fire Protection Procedure FPP-013.
-
-
-
5
Several _ welding operations were observed in the Unit-2 reactor building
during outage maintenance activities.
An approved " Hot Work" permit had
been issued for the welding sites and the operations and fire prevention /
protection practices generally met the licensee's fire prevention procedure
requirements.
The general housekeeping as a whole had deteriorated somewhat since the last
NRC fire protection . inspection.
This can be contributed to the Unit 2
outage activities and the licensee's failure to identify and correct adverse
housekeeping practices as identified _ by above Violation Item 324/86-04-02
and 325/86-03-02.
Except as noted above, no additional violations or deviations were identi-
fied within the areas inspected.
7.
Inspector Followup Items
(Closed) Inspector Followup Item, (324/84-37-01 and 325/84-37-01), Surveil-
lance Testing for Eight Hour Battery Powered Emergency Lighting Units.
Procedure PT-34.15.9.1 Revision 0, was issued on November 13, 1985, to
provide semiannual physical inspection and lighting head positioning for all
Appendix R Emergency Lighting . Units.
In addition, this procedure provides
for an 18-month battery capacity 8-hour discharge test for a 10% sample of
the emergency lighting units. The scope of testing and schedule provided in
the procedure appear acceptable.
1
,
_