ML20073A260: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. .           O                                                                               9 DUKE POWER GOMPANY tj p j p C P E O P3 N r.o. nox aatso         ,,,.g,.**'~
{{#Wiki_filter:..
                                                                                    .a.  .
O 9
CIIAHLoTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL II. TUCKER                                                                         TEIEPIION';
DUKE POWER GOMPANY tj p j p C P E O P3 N r.o. nox aatso
vna emessonst March 8r 1983 33 MAR 11   Pl2
,,,.g,.
* S(7f&) 373-4 Mr. James P, O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 303c3 Subj ect: Oconee Nuclear Station IE Inspection Report 50-269/82-43 50-270/82-43 50-287/82-43
.a.
**'~
CIIAHLoTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL II. TUCKER TEIEPIION';
33 MAR 11 Pl2
* S(7f&) 373-4 vna emessonst March 8r 1983 Mr. James P, O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 303c3 Subj ect: Oconee Nuclear Station IE Inspection Report 50-269/82-43 50-270/82-43 50-287/82-43


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
With regard to your letter of February 9, 1983 which transmitted the subject inspection report, Duke Power Company was.to submit a response to the cited item of noncompliance by March 9, 1983. However, the response to the cited item of noncompliance is still under investigation and it is expected that the response will be submitted to you no later than March 14, 1983.
With regard to your letter of February 9, 1983 which transmitted the subject inspection report, Duke Power Company was.to submit a response to the cited item of noncompliance by March 9, 1983. However, the response to the cited item of noncompliance is still under investigation and it is expected that the response will be submitted to you no later than March 14, 1983.
Very truly yours, fE.                       lrg
Very truly yours, fE.
Hal B. Tucker PFG/php I
lrg Hal B. Tucker PFG/php I
i l
i l
i I
i I
l l
l l
l i
l i
83041.i.0703 830325 l PDR ADOCK 05000269 G
83041.i.0703 830325 PDR ADOCK 05000269 l
PDR 9
G PDR 9
i
i
                                                                      ^
^
                                                                                                        ;}}
;}}

Latest revision as of 04:08, 15 December 2024

Advises That Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-269/82-43,50-270/82-43 & 50-287/82-43 Will Be Submitted by 830314
ML20073A260
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/08/1983
From: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20073A166 List:
References
NUDOCS 8304110703
Download: ML20073A260 (1)


Text

..

O 9

DUKE POWER GOMPANY tj p j p C P E O P3 N r.o. nox aatso

,,,.g,.

.a.

    • '~

CIIAHLoTTE, N.C. 28242 IIAL II. TUCKER TEIEPIION';

33 MAR 11 Pl2

  • S(7f&) 373-4 vna emessonst March 8r 1983 Mr. James P, O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 303c3 Subj ect: Oconee Nuclear Station IE Inspection Report 50-269/82-43 50-270/82-43 50-287/82-43

Dear Sir:

With regard to your letter of February 9, 1983 which transmitted the subject inspection report, Duke Power Company was.to submit a response to the cited item of noncompliance by March 9, 1983. However, the response to the cited item of noncompliance is still under investigation and it is expected that the response will be submitted to you no later than March 14, 1983.

Very truly yours, fE.

lrg Hal B. Tucker PFG/php I

i l

i I

l l

l i

83041.i.0703 830325 PDR ADOCK 05000269 l

G PDR 9

i

^