ML20154P837: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.
{{#Wiki_filter:.
C COOPER NUCLEAR STATION B
C B
                                                                " " * "A"E#"o"eti;           %""^,',"^
_ Nebraska Public Power iistrict COOPER NUCLEAR STATION
_ Nebraska Public Power iistrict I' (C'' "
" " * "A"E#"o"eti; %""^,',"^ "'''
f5 l & lj{ W %
I' (C f5 l
CNSS867102                                                       !    .                          !
& lj{ W %
L7 February 10, 1986                                                   \       FEB I 4 1986 h
CNSS867102 L7 February 10, 1986
\\
FEB I 4 1986 h
L_
L_
Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief i    Reactor Projects Branch U.S. liuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011
Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch i
U.S. liuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 32: Line 35:


==Dear Mr. Gagliardo:==
==Dear Mr. Gagliardo:==
 
This letter is written in response to your {{letter dated|date=January 13, 1986|text=letter dated January 13, 1986}}, transmitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-32.
This letter is written in response to your {{letter dated|date=January 13, 1986|text=letter dated January 13, 1986}}, transmitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-32. Therein you indicated that one of our activities was in violation of NRC requirements.
Therein you indicated that one of our activities was in violation of NRC requirements.
Following is a statement of the violation and our response in accordance with 10CFR2.201:
Following is a statement of the violation and our response in accordance with 10CFR2.201:
Statement of Violation Criterion V of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and the licensee's approved quality assurance program require that activities affecting quality be performed in accordance with approved procedures, instructions, or drawings.
Statement of Violation Criterion V of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and the licensee's approved quality assurance program require that activities affecting quality be performed in accordance with approved procedures, instructions, or drawings.
Quality Assurance Program for Operation Policy Document, Revision 2, dated April 29, 1985, paragraph 2.12 states, in part, " Procedures shall define the requirements cf inspection, maintenance, repair, and calibration of all tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices which are used in connection with activities which affect quality of safety-related equipmer.t..."
Quality Assurance Program for Operation Policy Document, Revision 2, dated April 29, 1985, paragraph 2.12 states, in part, " Procedures shall define the requirements cf inspection, maintenance, repair, and calibration of all tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices which are used in connection with activities which affect quality of safety-related equipmer.t..."
Contrary to the above, procedures did not define the requirements of calibration of certain gauges used in connection with safety-related activities.         It was found that pressure gauges used for local leak rate testing to Technical Specifications requirements 4.7.A.2.f and identified as LLRT-2 through 7, although checked, were not addressed in procedures which define such requirements as tolerances, frequency, standards, and documentation.
Contrary to the above, procedures did not define the requirements of calibration of certain gauges used in connection with safety-related activities.
It was found that pressure gauges used for local leak rate testing to Technical Specifications requirements 4.7.A.2.f and identified as LLRT-2 through 7, although checked, were not addressed in procedures which define such requirements as tolerances, frequency, standards, and documentation.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.D.) (50-298/8532-01).
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.D.) (50-298/8532-01).
9603200429 860307 I
9603200429 860307 I
PDR     ADOCK 05000298 l         G                         PDR
PDR ADOCK 05000298 l
G PDR
[C-oc7.kfsfo
[C-oc7.kfsfo


Mr.' J*. E. Gagliardo February 10, 1986 Page 2 Reason for Violation In reviewing the root cause of this violation, it was determined that measuring and test equipment which is frequently used in the usual course of station operation and maintenance is adequately controlled by station procedures. However, it was found that some measuring and test equipment was being maintained by the CNS Engineering Department for use by engineering personnel in troubleshooting and specialized testing activities. The pressure gauges noted in the Statement of Violation fall within this group. Other examples are the helium leak detection instrument which is used to find main condenser in-leakage and the Rebar Locator which is used to locate rebar imbedded in concrete. As a result of this practice, calibration requirements were often left to engineering judgement and were not always controlled by a formal procedure.
Mr.' J*.
E. Gagliardo February 10, 1986 Page 2 Reason for Violation In reviewing the root cause of this violation, it was determined that measuring and test equipment which is frequently used in the usual course of station operation and maintenance is adequately controlled by station procedures. However, it was found that some measuring and test equipment was being maintained by the CNS Engineering Department for use by engineering personnel in troubleshooting and specialized testing activities. The pressure gauges noted in the Statement of Violation fall within this group.
Other examples are the helium leak detection instrument which is used to find main condenser in-leakage and the Rebar Locator which is used to locate rebar imbedded in concrete.
As a result of this practice, calibration requirements were often left to engineering judgement and were not always controlled by a formal procedure.
Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved.
Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved.
For the pressure gauges described in the Notice of Violation, procedure revisions were initiated to correct the noted deficiencies. These revisions will properly define the requirements of calibration of primary containment local leak test pressure gauges.
For the pressure gauges described in the Notice of Violation, procedure revisions were initiated to correct the noted deficiencies.
These revisions will properly define the requirements of calibration of primary containment local leak test pressure gauges.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations.
Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations.
Station procedures will be revised to require that all measuring and test equipment be turned over to the appropriate maintenance department and placed under formal procedural control.
Station procedures will be revised to require that all measuring and test equipment be turned over to the appropriate maintenance department and placed under formal procedural control.
Line 52: Line 61:
Should you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me.
Should you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me.
Sincerely, h /1f&
Sincerely, h /1f&
[         lant Technical Staff Manager Nuclear Power Group JMP: RCD:ss 1
[
1 1
lant Technical Staff Manager Nuclear Power Group JMP: RCD:ss 1}}
1}}

Latest revision as of 23:31, 10 December 2024

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/85-32.Corrective Actions:Procedures Revised to Require That Measuring & Test Equipment Be Turned Over to Maint Dept & Placed Under Formal Procedural Control
ML20154P837
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/1986
From: Pilant J
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20154P835 List:
References
CNSS867102, NUDOCS 8603200429
Download: ML20154P837 (2)


Text

.

C B

_ Nebraska Public Power iistrict COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

" " * "A"E#"o"eti; %""^,',"^ "

I' (C f5 l

& lj{ W %

CNSS867102 L7 February 10, 1986

\\

FEB I 4 1986 h

L_

Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch i

U.S. liuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011

Subject:

NPPD Response to Inspection Report 50-298/85-32

Dear Mr. Gagliardo:

This letter is written in response to your letter dated January 13, 1986, transmitting Inspection Report 50-298/85-32.

Therein you indicated that one of our activities was in violation of NRC requirements.

Following is a statement of the violation and our response in accordance with 10CFR2.201:

Statement of Violation Criterion V of 10CFR Part 50, Appendix B, and the licensee's approved quality assurance program require that activities affecting quality be performed in accordance with approved procedures, instructions, or drawings.

Quality Assurance Program for Operation Policy Document, Revision 2, dated April 29, 1985, paragraph 2.12 states, in part, " Procedures shall define the requirements cf inspection, maintenance, repair, and calibration of all tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices which are used in connection with activities which affect quality of safety-related equipmer.t..."

Contrary to the above, procedures did not define the requirements of calibration of certain gauges used in connection with safety-related activities.

It was found that pressure gauges used for local leak rate testing to Technical Specifications requirements 4.7.A.2.f and identified as LLRT-2 through 7, although checked, were not addressed in procedures which define such requirements as tolerances, frequency, standards, and documentation.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I.D.) (50-298/8532-01).

9603200429 860307 I

PDR ADOCK 05000298 l

G PDR

[C-oc7.kfsfo

Mr.' J*.

E. Gagliardo February 10, 1986 Page 2 Reason for Violation In reviewing the root cause of this violation, it was determined that measuring and test equipment which is frequently used in the usual course of station operation and maintenance is adequately controlled by station procedures. However, it was found that some measuring and test equipment was being maintained by the CNS Engineering Department for use by engineering personnel in troubleshooting and specialized testing activities. The pressure gauges noted in the Statement of Violation fall within this group.

Other examples are the helium leak detection instrument which is used to find main condenser in-leakage and the Rebar Locator which is used to locate rebar imbedded in concrete.

As a result of this practice, calibration requirements were often left to engineering judgement and were not always controlled by a formal procedure.

Corrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved.

For the pressure gauges described in the Notice of Violation, procedure revisions were initiated to correct the noted deficiencies.

These revisions will properly define the requirements of calibration of primary containment local leak test pressure gauges.

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations.

Station procedures will be revised to require that all measuring and test equipment be turned over to the appropriate maintenance department and placed under formal procedural control.

Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved.

Full co pliance will be achieved by August 1, 1986.

Should you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me.

Sincerely, h /1f&

[

lant Technical Staff Manager Nuclear Power Group JMP: RCD:ss 1