ML20246P705: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - - | {{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - - | ||
i | v i | ||
ENCLOSURE I NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No.: 50-413 | |||
~ | |||
' Catawba Nuclear Station-License No.: NPF-35 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commi ssion (NRC) inspection - conducted : on April 10 - May 5,1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with. the " General Statement of Policy' and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, " 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is 1isted below: | |||
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures' be established, implemented, and maintained as recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978. | |||
1isted below: | Appendix A of Regulatory Guide '1.33-recommends procedures for operation of the Compo-nent Cooling Water System and for contamination control. | ||
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures' be established, implemented, and maintained as recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, | 1. | ||
Procedure OP/1/A/6400/05, Component Cooling Water System, change 45, requires valve 1-KC-9 to be locked in position. | |||
Contrary to the above, on April 13, 1989, Unit I was operating at' caroximately 100 % power; valve 1-KC-9.was not locked in position. | Contrary to the above, on April 13, 1989, Unit I was operating at' caroximately 100 % power; valve 1-KC-9.was not locked in position. | ||
2. | |||
the first available frisker to prevent the spread of contamination. | Station Directive 3.8.3 (T.S.), Contamination Prevention, Control, and Decontamination Responsibilities, Revision 24, requires that when exiting a contaminated area a whole body frisk shall be performed at the first available frisker to prevent the spread of contamination. | ||
Contrary to the above, on April 12 and May 2, 1989, Unit 1 auxiliary operators failed to frisk at the first available frisker after exiting contaminated areas in the auxiliary building. | Contrary to the above, on April 12 and May 2, 1989, Unit 1 auxiliary operators failed to frisk at the first available frisker after exiting contaminated areas in the auxiliary building. | ||
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement'I) | This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement'I) | ||
Pursuant to the provisions .of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company _ is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,' ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, Catawba Nuclear Station and a copy to | Pursuant to the provisions.of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company _ is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,' ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, Catawba Nuclear Station and a copy to | ||
.the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmit-ting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]: (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the correc-tive step., which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received 8907200292 890710 DR ADOCK 0500 3 | |||
,s | |||
., ; + ' | |||
D' uke l Power Company . | D' uke l Power Company. | ||
2 Docket No.: | |||
50-413 Cat.awba Nuclear. Station License No.: NPF-35. | |||
within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show'cause- | within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show'cause- | ||
:why:the license 'should not -be modified, ' suspended or: revoked or why such other action' as may be proper should not be taken. | :why:the license 'should not -be modified, ' suspended or: revoked or why such other action' as may be proper should not be taken. | ||
l | l FOR-THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
/, / | |||
If Albert'F. Gibson, Dir | If Albert'F. Gibson, Dir or l | ||
Division of Reactor | Division of Reactor fety i | ||
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this #" day of h | Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this #" day of h 1989 l | ||
k 1 | k 1 | ||
I- | I-J}} | ||
J}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 1 December 2024
| ML20246P705 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba |
| Issue date: | 07/10/1989 |
| From: | Gibson A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246P695 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-89-09, 50-413-89-9, NUDOCS 8907200292 | |
| Download: ML20246P705 (2) | |
Text
_ _ - -
v i
ENCLOSURE I NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No.: 50-413
~
' Catawba Nuclear Station-License No.: NPF-35 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commi ssion (NRC) inspection - conducted : on April 10 - May 5,1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with. the " General Statement of Policy' and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions, " 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989), the violation is 1isted below:
Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures' be established, implemented, and maintained as recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.
Appendix A of Regulatory Guide '1.33-recommends procedures for operation of the Compo-nent Cooling Water System and for contamination control.
1.
Procedure OP/1/A/6400/05, Component Cooling Water System, change 45, requires valve 1-KC-9 to be locked in position.
Contrary to the above, on April 13, 1989, Unit I was operating at' caroximately 100 % power; valve 1-KC-9.was not locked in position.
2.
Station Directive 3.8.3 (T.S.), Contamination Prevention, Control, and Decontamination Responsibilities, Revision 24, requires that when exiting a contaminated area a whole body frisk shall be performed at the first available frisker to prevent the spread of contamination.
Contrary to the above, on April 12 and May 2, 1989, Unit 1 auxiliary operators failed to frisk at the first available frisker after exiting contaminated areas in the auxiliary building.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement'I)
Pursuant to the provisions.of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Company _ is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,' ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, Catawba Nuclear Station and a copy to
.the NRC Resident Inspector, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmit-ting this Notice. This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation]: (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the correc-tive step., which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time. If an adequate reply is not received 8907200292 890710 DR ADOCK 0500 3
,s
., ; + '
D' uke l Power Company.
2 Docket No.:
50-413 Cat.awba Nuclear. Station License No.: NPF-35.
within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show'cause-
- why:the license 'should not -be modified, ' suspended or: revoked or why such other action' as may be proper should not be taken.
l FOR-THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/, /
If Albert'F. Gibson, Dir or l
Division of Reactor fety i
Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this #" day of h 1989 l
k 1
I-J