ML20205D673: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:p aa.g h, ', " | ||
k w( NUCLEAR RE U RY COMMi& .ON SECRlTARIAT Rf mc | |||
", 't - WASHING TON. D. C. 20555 | |||
\' ***** | |||
%) J October 4, 1984 NOTE TO: William Reamer , | |||
James Cutchin Patricia Davis Stephen Sohinki William Parler FROM: Guy H. Cunningham, III, , | |||
Executive Legal Director | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 RESTART Attached for your infortnation is a copy of the draft version of the Comis-sion Paper regarding San Onofre Unit 1 Restart which contains a more expansive discussion of the procedural issues involved than is presented in SECY-84 V n Also, attached are (1) a copy of the memorandum from the licensees' attorneys, Miller & Chevalier, presenting their analysis and position on restart and (2) a copy of the California PUC's Interim Opinion issued on May 2,1984. We are currently analyzing the Miller & Chevalier memorandum. | |||
4 '% | |||
Guy H. Cunnin [ III, Executive Legal Director cc: H. Plaine i | |||
I f.0,. ,' | |||
~ | |||
Df 8510170062 PDR FOIA 850926 | |||
/ Nr BELLB4-885 PDR H -}} | |||
Revision as of 01:10, 30 December 2020
| ML20205D673 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 10/04/1984 |
| From: | Cunningham G NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Cutchin J, Davis P, Reamer W NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205D636 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-885 NUDOCS 8510170062 | |
| Download: ML20205D673 (1) | |
Text
p aa.g h, ', "
k w( NUCLEAR RE U RY COMMi& .ON SECRlTARIAT Rf mc
", 't - WASHING TON. D. C. 20555
\' *****
%) J October 4, 1984 NOTE TO: William Reamer ,
James Cutchin Patricia Davis Stephen Sohinki William Parler FROM: Guy H. Cunningham, III, ,
Executive Legal Director
SUBJECT:
SAN ONOFRE UNIT 1 RESTART Attached for your infortnation is a copy of the draft version of the Comis-sion Paper regarding San Onofre Unit 1 Restart which contains a more expansive discussion of the procedural issues involved than is presented in SECY-84 V n Also, attached are (1) a copy of the memorandum from the licensees' attorneys, Miller & Chevalier, presenting their analysis and position on restart and (2) a copy of the California PUC's Interim Opinion issued on May 2,1984. We are currently analyzing the Miller & Chevalier memorandum.
4 '%
Guy H. Cunnin [ III, Executive Legal Director cc: H. Plaine i
I f.0,. ,'
~
/ Nr BELLB4-885 PDR H -