ML20197A878: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000285/1986002]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20197A878
| issue date = 05/05/1986
| title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/86-02.Requests Addl Info Re Actions Taken to Ensure Adequate Performance of Required Insp & QA Dept Changes to Independent Audit
| author name = Gagliardo J
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| addressee name = Andrews R
| addressee affiliation = OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
| docket = 05000285
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = NUDOCS 8605120404
| title reference date = 03-20-1986
| package number = ML20197A883
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000285/1986002]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-
.,
                                          MAY 0 5 F
    In Reply Refer To:
    Docket: 50-285/86-02
    Omaha Public Power District
    ATTN: R. L. Andrews, Division Manager-
            Nuclear Production
    1623 Harney Street
    Omaha, Nebraska 68102
    Gentlemen:
    This refers to your letter of March 20, 1986, in response to our letter and the
    attached Notice of Violation dated February 18, 1986. As a result of our review,
    we find your response generally lacks in scope and depth and that additional
    information, as discussed with your Mr. J. Fisicaro during a meeting on March 31,
    1986, is required. You are requested to provide the additional information
    requested below:
    'a.    Regarding item a, describe the actions you have taken to ensure other
          inspections and/or surveillances required by other license comitments are
          not dependent on an individual's memory,
    b.    Regarding item b, based on the results of the NRC inspectior., it was
          concluded that the inspection was not appropriate and licensee management
          agreed with this conclusion. In light of this conclusion, it is requested
          that you review other inspections performed by the licensee's inspector to
          determine whether or not those inspections were perfonned adequately and
          provide the results of the review.    Also, provide your basis for determining
          this to be an isolated instance.
    c.    In response to item c, describe what actions you have taken to detennine
          whether or not QA is in a surveillance (performance) mode for other
          activities and what actions you will take to change the QA departraent to an
          independent audit mode.
    Please provide the supplemental infonnation within 30 days of the date of this
    letter.
                                              Sincerely,
  fjkM g 4 e60505 0500    5
                              -
                                                Original signed ay
  G                                              .l. E. GagHardo
                                              J. E. Gagliardo, Chief
                                              Reactor Projects Branch
    cc:  (see next page)
    RIV:
    PHa        tw
                      C:RP
                      DRH
                                    C:RP
                                    JEGag
                                            /
                                              rdo
                                                                                          [
    {jf\f86            (Q/86        4/ S
 
        '
  .
          Omaha Public Power District              -2-
          cc:
          W. G. Gates, Manager
          Fort Calhoun Station
          P.O. Box 399
          Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023
          Harry H. Voigt, Esq.
          LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae
          1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
          Washington, DC 20036
          Kansas Radiation Control Program Director
          Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director
          bcc to DMB (IE35)
          bec distrib. by RIV:
.        RPB                      DRS&P
          R&SPB                    R. D. Martin, RA
          RIV File                  MIS System
          Resident Inspector        RSTS Operator
          SectionChief(RPB/B)      RSB
i
    __      ,
}}

Revision as of 23:48, 20 December 2021

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/86-02.Requests Addl Info Re Actions Taken to Ensure Adequate Performance of Required Insp & QA Dept Changes to Independent Audit
ML20197A878
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 05/05/1986
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20197A883 List:
References
NUDOCS 8605120404
Download: ML20197A878 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 05000285/1986002

Text

-

.,

MAY 0 5 F

In Reply Refer To:

Docket: 50-285/86-02

Omaha Public Power District

ATTN: R. L. Andrews, Division Manager-

Nuclear Production

1623 Harney Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68102

Gentlemen:

This refers to your letter of March 20, 1986, in response to our letter and the

attached Notice of Violation dated February 18, 1986. As a result of our review,

we find your response generally lacks in scope and depth and that additional

information, as discussed with your Mr. J. Fisicaro during a meeting on March 31,

1986, is required. You are requested to provide the additional information

requested below:

'a. Regarding item a, describe the actions you have taken to ensure other

inspections and/or surveillances required by other license comitments are

not dependent on an individual's memory,

b. Regarding item b, based on the results of the NRC inspectior., it was

concluded that the inspection was not appropriate and licensee management

agreed with this conclusion. In light of this conclusion, it is requested

that you review other inspections performed by the licensee's inspector to

determine whether or not those inspections were perfonned adequately and

provide the results of the review. Also, provide your basis for determining

this to be an isolated instance.

c. In response to item c, describe what actions you have taken to detennine

whether or not QA is in a surveillance (performance) mode for other

activities and what actions you will take to change the QA departraent to an

independent audit mode.

Please provide the supplemental infonnation within 30 days of the date of this

letter.

Sincerely,

fjkM g 4 e60505 0500 5

-

Original signed ay

G .l. E. GagHardo

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch

cc: (see next page)

RIV:

PHa tw

C:RP

DRH

C:RP

JEGag

/

rdo

[

{jf\f86 (Q/86 4/ S

'

.

Omaha Public Power District -2-

cc:

W. G. Gates, Manager

Fort Calhoun Station

P.O. Box 399

Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023

Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director

Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director

bcc to DMB (IE35)

bec distrib. by RIV:

. RPB DRS&P

R&SPB R. D. Martin, RA

RIV File MIS System

Resident Inspector RSTS Operator

SectionChief(RPB/B) RSB

i

__ ,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197A878&oldid=3384959"