ML20196D051: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:a -.: | ||
*~ | |||
DOCKET NUMBER DD 60 WOPOSED RULE m 2 (53 FK IH3$ y CC(KiiiP Mr c E MM M M88 Samuel J. Chilk 0Frin y s. . | |||
r.,> | |||
Secretary of the Commission At00dMileW 'Docklet i ng U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and SEWi'ce Branch 1717 H Street, N.W. | |||
Washington, D.C. 20555 | |||
==Dear Sir:== | |||
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants. | |||
The proposed rule change would eliminat'e many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel. | |||
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements. | |||
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously ; | |||
in doubt. ' | |||
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response ' | |||
planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation. | |||
Sincerely, \ " ' | |||
/'/L.- | |||
Name and Address: 9W $ \psdGWd w& % | |||
SM sm % | |||
7 Q'M 4h Amemum, m.ot H3 ggy'f pyg d/fe 880701009'd OUN'06 . | |||
PR lylj gg PDR ps -/ o | |||
- -}} | |||
Revision as of 05:21, 13 November 2020
| ML20196D051 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1988 |
| From: | Langlois S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00823, 53FR16435-823, NUDOCS 8807010295 | |
| Download: ML20196D051 (1) | |
Text
a -.:
- ~
DOCKET NUMBER DD 60 WOPOSED RULE m 2 (53 FK IH3$ y CC(KiiiP Mr c E MM M M88 Samuel J. Chilk 0Frin y s. .
r.,>
Secretary of the Commission At00dMileW 'Docklet i ng U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and SEWi'ce Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Sir:
On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.
The proposed rule change would eliminat'e many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.
As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.
The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously ;
in doubt. '
In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response '
planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.
Sincerely, \ " '
/'/L.-
Name and Address: 9W $ \psdGWd w& %
SM sm %
7 Q'M 4h Amemum, m.ot H3 ggy'f pyg d/fe 880701009'd OUN'06 .
PR lylj gg PDR ps -/ o
- -