|
|
| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES 6.1 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-1 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 6.1-1 6.1.1.1 Materials Selection and Fabrication 6.1-1 6.1.1.2 Composition, Compatibility, and Stability of Containment and Core Spray Coolants 6.1-2 6.1.2 Organic Materials 6.1-3 6.1.2.1 Electrical Insulation 6.1-3 6.1.2.2 Surface Coatings 6.1-3 6.1.2.3 Ice Condenser Equipment 6.1-4 6.1.2.4 Identification Tags 6.1-4 6.1.2.5 Valves and Instruments within Containment 6.1-4 6.1.2.6 Heating and Ventilating Door Seals 6.1-4 6.1.3 Post-Accident Chemistry 6.1-4 6.1.3.1 Boric Acid, H3BO3 6.1-5 6.1.3.2 Lithium Hydroxide 6.1-5 6.1.3.3 Sodium Tetraborate 6.1-5 6.1.3.4 Final Post-Accident Chemistry 6.1-5 6.1.4 Degree of Compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.54 for Paints and Coatings Inside Containment 6.1-5 6.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2.1 Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-1 6.2.1.1 Design Bases 6.2.1-1 6.2.1.1.1 Primary Containment Design Bases 6.2.1-1 6.2.1.2 Primary Containment System Design 6.2.1-3 6.2.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.1-3 6.2.1.3.1 Primary Containment Evaluation 6.2.1-3 6.2.1.3.2 General Description of Containment Pressure Analysis 6.2.1-4 6.2.1.3.3 Long-Term Containment Pressure Analysis 6.2.1-4 6.2.1.3.4 Short-Term Blowdown Analysis 6.2.1-8 6.2.1.3.5 Effect of Steam Bypass 6.2.1-17 6.2.1.3.6 Mass and Energy Release Data 6.2.1-20 6.2.1.3.7 Accident Chronology 6.2.1-24 6.2.1.3.8 Energy Balance Tables 6.2.1-24 6.2.1.3.9 Containment Pressure Differentials 6.2.1-24 6.2.1.3.10 Steam Line Break Inside Containment 6.2.1-27 6.2.1.3.11 Maximum Reverse Pressure Differentials 6.2.1-33 6.2.2 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-1 6.2.2.1 Design Bases 6.2.2-1 Table of Contents 6-i | | {{#Wiki_filter:}} |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.2.2.2 System Design 6.2.2-3 6.2.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.2-5 6.2.2.4 Testing and Inspections 6.2.2-7 6.2.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.2-8 6.2.2.6 Materials 6.2.2-8 6.2.3 Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-1 6.2.3.1 Design Bases 6.2.3-1 6.2.3.1.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures 6.2.3-1 6.2.3.1.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS) 6.2.3-1 6.2.3.1.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS) 6.2.3-2 6.2.3.2 System Design 6.2.3-2 6.2.3.2.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures 6.2.3-2 6.2.3.2.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS) 6.2.3-7 6.2.3.2.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS) 6.2.3-10 6.2.3.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.3-12 6.2.3.3.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures 6.2.3-12 6.2.3.3.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS) 6.2.3-15 6.2.3.3.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS) 6.2.3-19 6.2.3.4 Test and Inspections 6.2.3-21 6.2.3.4.1 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS) 6.2.3-21 6.2.3.4.2 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS) 6.2.3-22 6.2.3.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.3-23 6.2.3.5.1 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS) 6.2.3-23 6.2.3.5.2 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS) 6.2.3-23 6.2.4 Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-1 6.2.4.1 Design Bases 6.2.4-1 6.2.4.2 System Design 6.2.4-4 6.2.4.2.1 Design Requirements 6.2.4-5 6.2.4.2.2 Containment Isolation Operation 6.2.4-5 6.2.4.2.3 Penetration Design 6.2.4-6 6.2.4.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.4-12 6.2.4.3.1 Possible Leakage Paths 6.2.4-14 6.2.4.4 Tests and Inspections 6.2.4-16 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-1 6.2.5.1 Design Bases 6.2.5-1 6.2.5.2 System Design 6.2.5-2 6.2.5.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.5-5 6.2.5.4 Testing and Inspections 6.2.5-5 6.2.5.5 Instrumentation Application 6.2.5-5 6.2.5.6 Materials 6.2.5-6 6.2.5A Hydrogen Mitigation System 6.2.5-6 Table of Contents 6-ii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.2.5A.1 Design Basis 6.2.5-6 6.2.5A.2 System Description 6.2.5-6 6.2.5A.3 Operation 6.2.5-7 6.2.5A.4 Safety Evaluation 6.2.5-7 6.2.5A.5 Testing 6.2.5-7 6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-1 6.2.6.1 Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test 6.2.6-1 6.2.6.2 Containment Penetration Leakage Rate Test 6.2.6-2 6.2.6.3 Scheduling and Reporting of Periodic Tests 6.2.6-6 6.2.6.4 Special Testing Requirements 6.2.6-6 6.3 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM 6.3-1 6.3.1 Design Bases 6.3-1 6.3.1.1 Range of Coolant Ruptures and Leaks 6.3-1 6.3.1.2 Fission Product Decay Heat 6.3-2 6.3.1.3 Reactivity Required for Cold Shutdown 6.3-2 6.3.1.4 Capability To Meet Functional Requirements 6.3-2 6.3.2 System Design 6.3-2 6.3.2.1 Schematic Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams 6.3-2 6.3.2.2 Equipment and Component Design 6.3-2 6.3.2.3 Applicable Codes and Classifications 6.3-17 6.3.2.4 Materials Specifications and Compatibility 6.3-17 6.3.2.5 Design Pressures and Temperatures 6.3-17 6.3.2.6 Coolant Quantity 6.3-18 6.3.2.7 Pump Characteristics 6.3-18 6.3.2.8 Heat Exchanger Characteristics 6.3-18 6.3.2.9 ECCS Flow Diagrams 6.3-18 6.3.2.10 Relief Valves 6.3-18 6.3.2.11 System Reliability 6.3-18 6.3.2.12 Protection Provisions 6.3-23 6.3.2.13 Provisions for Performance Testing 6.3-23 6.3.2.14 Net Positive Suction Head 6.3-24 6.3.2.15 Control of Motor-Operated Isolation Valves 6.3-24 6.3.2.16 Motor-Operated Valves and Controls 6.3-25 6.3.2.17 Manual Actions 6.3-25 6.3.2.18 Process Instrumentation 6.3-25 6.3.2.19 Materials 6.3-25 6.3.3 Performance Evaluation 6.3-25 6.3.3.1 Evaluation Model 6.3-25 6.3.3.2 ECCS Performance 6.3-26 6.3.3.3 Alternate Analysis Methods 6.3-26 6.3.3.4 Fuel Rod Perforations 6.3-27 6.3.3.5 Evaluation Model 6.3-27 Table of Contents 6-iii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.3.3.6 Fuel Clad Effects 6.3-27 6.3.3.7 ECCS Performance 6.3-27 6.3.3.8 Peak Factors 6.3-27 6.3.3.9 Fuel Rod Perforations 6.3-27 6.3.3.10 Conformance with Interim Acceptance Criteria 6.3-27 6.3.3.11 Effects of ECCS Operation on the Core 6.3-28 6.3.3.12 Use of Dual Function Components 6.3-28 6.3.3.13 Lag Times 6.3-30 6.3.3.14 Thermal Shock Considerations 6.3-30 6.3.3.15 Limits on System Parameters 6.3-30 6.3.3.16 Use of RHR Spray 6.3-30 6.3.4 Tests and Inspections 6.3-31 6.3.4.1 Preoperational Tests 6.3-31 6.3.4.2 Component Testing 6.3-32 6.3.4.3 Periodic System Testing 6.3-32 6.3.5 Instrumentation Application 6.3-33 6.3.5.1 Temperature Indication 6.3-33 6.3.5.2 Pressure Indication 6.3-33 6.3.5.3 Flow Indication 6.3-34 6.3.5.4 Level Indication 6.3-34 6.3.5.5 Valve Position Indication 6.3-35 6.4 HABITABILITY SYSTEMS 6.4-1 6.4.1 Design Bases 6.4-1 6.4.2 System Design 6.4-1 6.4.2.1 Definition of MCRHS Area 6.4-1 6.4.2.2 Ventilation System Design 6.4-2 6.4.2.3 Leak Tightness 6.4-2 6.4.2.4 Interaction with Other Zones and Pressure-Containing Equipment 6.4-3 6.4.2.5 Shielding Design 6.4-4 6.4.2.6 Control Room Emergency Provisions 6.4-4 6.4.2.7 MCRHS Fire Protection 6.4-4 6.4.3 System Operational Procedures 6.4-5 6.4.4 Design Evaluations 6.4-7 6.4.4.1 Radiological Protection 6.4-7 6.4.4.2 Toxic Gas Protection 6.4-7 6.4.5 Testing and Inspection 6.4-9 6.4.6 Instrumentation Requirements 6.4-9 6.5 FISSION PRODUCT REMOVAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS 6.5-1 6.5.1 Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) Filter Systems 6.5-1 6.5.1.1 Design Bases 6.5-1 6.5.1.2 System Design 6.5-2 6.5.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.5-5 Table of Contents 6-iv
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.5.1.4 Tests and Inspections 6.5-5 6.5.1.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.5-6 6.5.1.6 Materials 6.5-7 6.5.2 Containment Spray System for Fission Product Cleanup 6.5-8 6.5.2.1 Design Bases 6.5-8 6.5.2.2 System Design 6.5-8 6.5.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.5-8 6.5.2.4 Tests and Inspections 6.5-8 6.5.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.5-8 6.5.2.6 Materials 6.5-8 6.5.3 Fission Product Control Systems 6.5-8 6.5.3.1 Primary Containment 6.5-8 6.5.3.2 Secondary Containments 6.5-10 6.5.4 Ice Condenser as a Fission Product Cleanup System 6.5-10 6.5.4.1 Ice Condenser Design Basis (Fission Product Cleanup Function) 6.5-11 6.5.4.2 Ice Condenser System Design 6.5-11 6.5.4.3 Ice Condenser System Design Evaluation (Fission Product Cleanup Function) 6.5-11 6.5.4.4 Condenser System Tests and Inspections 6.5-13 6.5.4.5 Ice Condenser Materials 6.5-13 6.6 INSERVICE INSPECTION OF ASME CODE CLASS 2 AND 3 COMPONENTS 6.6-1 6.6.1 Components Subject to Examination and/or Test 6.6-1 6.6.2 Accessibility 6.6-1 6.6.3 Examination Techniques and Procedures 6.6-1 6.6.4 Inspection Intervals 6.6-1 6.6.5 Examination Categories and Requirements 6.6-1 6.6.6 Evaluation of Examination Results 6.6-1 6.6.7 System Pressure Tests 6.6-2 6.6.8 Protection against Postulated Piping Failures 6.6-2 6.7 ICE CONDENSER SYSTEM 6.7-1 6.7.1 Floor Structure and Cooling System 6.7-1 6.7.1.1 Design Bases 6.7-1 6.7.1.2 Design Evaluation 6.7-5 6.7.2 Wall Panels 6.7-8 6.7.2.1 Design Basis 6.7-8 6.7.2.2 System Design 6.7-8 6.7.2.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-9 6.7.3 Lattice Frames and Support Columns 6.7-9 6.7.3.1 Design Basis 6.7-9 6.7.3.2 System Design 6.7-12 6.7.3.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-13 Table of Contents 6-v
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.7.4 Ice Baskets 6.7-14 6.7.4.1 Design Basis 6.7-14 6.7.4.2 System Design 6.7-15 6.7.4.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-18 6.7.5 Crane and Rail Assembly 6.7-20 6.7.5.1 Design Basis 6.7-20 6.7.5.2 System Design 6.7-20 6.7.5.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-21 6.7.6 Refrigeration System 6.7-21 6.7.6.1 Design Basis 6.7-21 6.7.6.2 System Design 6.7-22 6.7.6.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-25 6.7.7 Air Handling Units 6.7-29 6.7.7.1 Design Basis 6.7-29 6.7.7.2 System Design 6.7-30 6.7.7.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-31 6.7.8 Lower Inlet Doors 6.7-31 6.7.8.1 Design Basis 6.7-31 6.7.8.2 System Design 6.7-34 6.7.8.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-36 6.7.9 Lower Support Structure 6.7-37 6.7.9.1 Design Basis 6.7-37 6.7.9.2 System Design 6.7-39 6.7.9.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-40 6.7.10 Top Deck and Doors 6.7-49 6.7.10.1 Design Basis 6.7-49 6.7.10.2 System Design 6.7-51 6.7.11 Intermediate Deck and Doors 6.7-54 6.7.11.1 Design Basis 6.7-54 6.7.11.2 System Design 6.7-55 6.7.11.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-56 6.7.12 Air Distribution Ducts 6.7-57 6.7.12.1 Design Basis 6.7-57 6.7.12.2 System Design 6.7-58 6.7.12.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-58 6.7.13 Equipment Access Door 6.7-58 6.7.13.1 Design Basis 6.7-58 6.7.13.2 System Design 6.7-59 6.7.13.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-59 6.7.14 Ice Technology, Ice Performance, and Ice Chemistry 6.7-59 6.7.14.1 Design Basis 6.7-59 6.7.14.2 System Design 6.7-59 6.7.14.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-60 6.7.15 Ice Condenser Instrumentation 6.7-65 Table of Contents 6-vi
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 6.7.15.1 Design Basis 6.7-65 6.7.15.2 Design Description 6.7-66 6.7.15.3 Design Evaluation 6.7-67 6.7.16 Ice Condenser Structural Design 6.7-68 6.7.16.1 Applicable Codes, Standards, and Specifications 6.7-68 6.7.16.2 Loads and Loading Combinations 6.7-68 6.7.16.3 Design and Analytical Procedures 6.7-68 6.7.16.4 Structural Acceptance Criteria 6.7-69 6.7.17 Seismic Analysis 6.7-70 6.7.17.1 Seismic Analysis Methods 6.7-70 6.7.17.2 Seismic Load Development 6.7-73 6.7.17.3 Vertical Seismic Response 6.7-74 6.7.18 Materials 6.7-74 6.7.18.1 Design Criteria 6.7-74 6.7.18.2 Environmental Effects 6.7-75 6.7.18.3 Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B 6.7-76 6.7.18.4 Materials Specifications 6.7-77 6.7.19 Tests and Inspections 6.7-78 6.8 AIR RETURN FANS 6.8-1 6.8.1 Design Bases 6.8-1 6.8.2 System Description 6.8-1 6.8.3 Safety Evaluation 6.8-2 6.8.4 Inspection and Testing 6.8-3 6.8.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.8-3 Table of Contents 6-vii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents 6-viii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 LIST OF TABLES Section Title Table 6.1-1 Engineered Safety Feature Materials Table 6.2.1-1 Structural Heat Sinks Table 6.2.1-2 Pump Flow Rates Vs. Time Table 6.2.1-3 Energy Balances Table 6.2.1-4 Energy Balances Table 6.2.1-5 Material Property Data Table 6.2.1-6 TMD Input for Watts Barr Table 6.2.1-7 TMD Flow Input Data For Watts Bar Table 6.2.1-8 Calculated Maximum Peak Pressures In Lower Compartment Elements Assuming Unaugmented Flow Table 6.2.1-9 Calculated Maximum Peak Pressures In The Ice Condenser Compartment Assuming Unaugmented Flow Table 6.2.1-10 Calculated Maximum Differential Pressures Across The Operating Deck Or Lower Crane Wall Assuming Unaug-mented Flow Table 6.2.1-11 Calculated Maximum Differential Pressures Across The Upper Crane Wall Assuming Unaugmented Flow Table 6.2.1-12 Sensitivity Studies For D. C. Cook Plant Table 6.2.1-13 Watts Bar Ice Condenser Design Parameters Table 6.2.1-14 Allowable Leakage Area For Various Reactor Coolant System Break Sizes Table 6.2.1-15 Blowdown Data Summary Table 6.2.1-16a Blowdown Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Table 6.2.1-16b 0.6 Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine Table 6.2.1-16d Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine Break Table 6.2.1-16e Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine Break Table 6.2.1-17 19 Element W Reflood Model Table 6.2.1-18 Reflood Data Summary Table 6.2.1-19a Mass And Energy Releases Post-Blowdown Deps Guillotine Minimum Safeguards Table 6.2.1-19b Mass And Energy Releases Post-Blowdown Double-Ended Pump Suc-tion Guillotine Maximum Safeguards Table 6.2.1-19d Mass And Energy Releases 3 Ft2 Pump Suction Split Table 6.2.1-19e Mass And Energy Releases Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine Table 6.2.1-19f Mass And Energy Releases Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine Table 6.2.1-20 Watts Bar Maximum SI Post-Reflood Mass And Energy Release Information Table 6.2.1-21 Watts Bar Minimum SI Post-Reflood Mass And Energy Release Information Table 6.2.1-22 Available Energy Between 20.2 Psia And 14.7 Psia Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine List of Tables 6-ix
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 LIST OF TABLES Section Title Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break Table 6.2.1-25 Double-Ended Pump Suction LOCA Table 6.2.1-26a Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Max. S.I., W/Froth Table 6.2.1-26b Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth Table 6.2.1-26c Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth Table 6.2.1-26d Watts Bar Four Loop Plant 3 Ft2 Pump Suction Table 6.2.1-26e Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I Table 6.2.1-26f Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I Table 6.2.1-27a Steam Line Break Blowdown Table 6.2.1-27b Steam Generator Enclosure Geometry Table 6.2.1-27d Peak Differential Pressure - Steam Generator Enclosure Table 6.2.1-28 Mass And Energy Release Rates Into Pressurizer Enclosure Table 6.2.1-29 Pressurizer Geometric Data Table 6.2.1-29a Peak Differential Pressure - Pressurizer Enclosure Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg Table 6.2.1-31 Reactor Cavity Volumes Table 6.2.1-32 Flow Path Data (Reactor Cavity)
| |
| Table 6.2.1-33 Containment Data (Eccs Analysis)
| |
| Table 6.2.1-34 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nucle-ar Plant Containment - Upper Compartment Table 6.2.1-35 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nucle-ar Plant Containment - Upper Compartment Table 6.2.1-36 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nucle-ar Plant Containment - Lower Compartment Table 6.2.1-37 Maximum Reverse Pressure Differential Pressure Analysis Base Case Table 6.2.1-38 Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow vs. Time vs. Sump Temperature Table 6.2.1-39 Table 6.2.1-40 Steam Line Break Cases For Core Integrity Table 6.2.1-41 Line Break(1) Descriptions For Mass And Energy Releases Table 6.2.1-42 Small Break Descriptions For Mass And Energy Table 6.2.1-43 Large Break Analysis - Associated Times Table 6.2.1-44 Small Break Analysis - Small Split - Associated Times Table 6.2.2-1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP/MOTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS Table 6.2.2-2 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Design Parameters Table 6.2.3-1 Dual Containment Characteristics Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Gas Treatment System List of Tables 6-x
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 LIST OF TABLES Section Title Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Table 6.2.4-1 WATTS Bar Nuclear Plant Primary Containment and Shield Building Penetration Isolation System Data Sorted by: Containment Penetration Number Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING Table 6.2.4-3 PREVENTION OF BYPASS LEAKAGE TO THE ATMOSPHERE Table 6.2.4-4 INSTRUMENT LINES PENETRATING PRIMARY CONTAIN-MENT Table 6.2.5-1 Electric Hydrogen Recombiner Typical Parameters Table 6.2.5-2 Combustible Gas Control System Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Table 6.2.6-1 Penetrations Subjected To Type B Testing Table 6.2.6-2a Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing Table 6.2.6-2b Valves Exempted From Type C Leak Testing Table 6.2.6-3 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status Table 6.3-1 Emergency Core Cooling System Component Parameters Table 6.3-2 Materials Employed For Emergency Core Cooling System Components Table 6.3-3 Sequence Of Change-Over Operation, Injection To Recirculation Table 6.3-3a EVALUATION OF TIME SEQUENCE ASSOCIATED WITH CHANGEOVER OPERATION FROM INJECTION TO RECIRCU-LATION Table 6.3-4 NORMAL OPERATING STATUS OF EMERGENCY CORE COOL-ING SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR CORE COOLING Table 6.3-5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM SHARED FUNCTIONS EVALUATION Table 6.3-6 Maximum Recirculation Loop Leakage External To Containment Table 6.3-7 DELETED BY AMENDMENT 85 Table 6.3-8 Failure Modes And Effects Analysis For Active Failures For The Safety Injection System Table 6.3-9 Failure Modes And Effects Analysis For The Safety Injection System (Passive Failures Recirc. Mode)
| |
| Table 6.3-10 Principal Eccs Valve Positions Table 6.3-11 Normalized Decay Heat Table 6.4-1 Air Leakage (Exfiltration) Paths In The Watts Bar MCRHS Area Con-trol Room Table 6.4-2 Air Leakage (Infiltration) Paths In The Watts Bar Mcrhs Area Control Room Table 6.5-1 Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. 2, Section Applicability For The Emergency Gas Treatment System Table 6.5-2 Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. 2, Section Applicability For The Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System Table 6.5-3 Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev.2, Section Applicability List of Tables 6-xi
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-76 LIST OF TABLES Section Title For The Reactor Building Purge Ventilation System Table 6.5-4 Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. 2, Section Applicability For The Main Control Room Air Cleanup Subsystem Table 6.5-5 ESF Air Cleanup Unit Data Table 6.5-6 Deleted in FSAR Amendment 65 Table 6.5-7 Primary Containment Operation Following A DBA Table 6.5-8 Secondary Containment Operation Following A DBA Table 6.7-1 Wall Panel Design Loads(1)
| |
| Table 6.7-2 Ice Basket Load Summary Minimum Test Loads Table 6.7-3 Summary Of Stresses In Basket Due To Design Loads Table 6.7-4 Ice Basket Material Minimum Yield Stress Table 6.7-5 Allowable Stress Limits (D + Obe) For Ice Basket Materials Table 6.7-6 Allowable Stress Limits (D + Sse), (D + Dba) For Ice Basket Materials Table 6.7-7 Allowable Stress Limits (D + Sse + Dba) For Ice Basket Materials Table 6.7-8 Ice Basket Clevis Pin Stress Summary Table 6.7-9 Ice Basket Mounting Bracket Assembly Stress Summary Table 6.7-10 Ice Basket Plate Stress Summary Table 6.7-11 Ice Basket V-Bolt Stress Summary Table 6.7-12 Ice Basket - Basket End Stress Summary Table 6.7-13 Ice Bucket Coupling Screw Stress Summary3 Inch Elevation(1)
| |
| Table 6.7-14 Ice Bucket Coupling Screw Stress Summary12 Foot Elevation(1)
| |
| Table 6.7-15 Ice Basket Coupling Screw Stress Summary 24 Foot Elevation(1)
| |
| Table 6.7-16 Ice Bucket Coupling Screw Stress Summary 36 Foot Elevation(1)
| |
| Table 6.7-17 Crane And Rail Assembly Design Loads Table 6.7-18 Refrigeration System Parameters Table 6.7-18 Refrigeration System Parameters Continued Table 6.7-19 Lower Inlet Door Design Parameters And Loads Table 6.7-20 Design Loads And Parameters Top Deck Table 6.7-21 Summary Of Results Upper Blanket Door Structural Analysis - Loca Table 6.7-22 Design Loads And Parameters Intermediate Deck Table 6.7-23 Summary Of Waltz Mill Tests Table 6.7-24 Ice Condenser Rtds Table 6.7-25 Ice Condenser Allowable Limits (1)
| |
| Table 6.7-26 Selection Of Structural Steels In Relation To Prevention of Non-Ductile Fracture Of Ice Condenser Components Table 6.7-27 Summary Of Watts Bar Loads - Tangential Case Obtained Using The Two-Mass Dynamic Model Table 6.7-28 Summary Of Watts Bar Loads - Radial Case Obtained Using The Two-Mass Dynamic Model Table 6.7-29 Summary Of Load Results Of Five Non-Linear Dynamic Models Table 6.7-30 Summary Of Parameters Used In The Seismic Analysis List of Tables 6-xii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.1-1 Containment Sump pH Versus Time Figure 6.2.1-1 Pressure vs. Time Figure 6.2.1-2 Temperature VS. Time Figure 6.2.1-3 Active and Inactive Sump Temperature Transients Figure 6.2.1-4 Ice Melt Transient Figure 6.2.1-4a Ice Mass vs. Pressure Figure 6.2.1-5 Plan at Equiment Rooms Elevation Figure 6.2.1-6 Containment Section View Figure 6.2.1-7 Plan View at Ice Condenser Elevation Ice Condenser Compartments Figure 6.2.1-8 Layout of Containment Shell Figure 6.2.1-9 TMD Code Network Figure 6.2.1-10 Upper and Lower Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 1) Having a DEHL Break Figure 6.2.1-11 Upper and Lower Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 1) Having a DECL Break.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-12 Illustration of Choked Flow Characteristics Figure 6.2.1-13 Sensitivity of Peak Pressure to Air Comrression Ratio Figure 6.2.1-14 Steam Concentration in a Vertical Distribution Channel Figure 6.2.1-15 Peak Comnression Pressure Versus Compression Ratio Figure 6.2.1-16 Peak Compartment Pressure versus Blowdown Rate Figure 6.2.1-17 Sensitivity of Peak Compression Pressure to Deck Bypass Figure 6.2.1-18 Pressure Increase versus Deck Area from Deck Leakage Tests Figure 6.2.1-19 Energy Release at Time of Compression Peak Pressure From Full-Scale Section Tests with 1-Foot Diameter Baskets Figure 6.2.1-20 Pressure Increase versus Deck Area from Deck Leakage Tests Figure 6.2.1-21 Coolant Temperature at Core Inlet Figure 6.2.1-22 Core Reflooding Rate - Vin Figure 6.2.1-23 Carryover Fraction - Fout Figure 6.2.1-24 Fraction of Flow through Broken Loop.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-25 Post-Blowdown Downcomer and Core Water Height.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-26 Steam Generator Heat Content.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-27 Containment Model Schematic.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-28 Reactor Cavity TMD Network.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-29 Reactor Vessel Annulus Figure 6.2.1-30 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-31 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-32 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-33 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-34 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-35 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-36 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-37 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-38 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-39 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| List of Figures 6-xiii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.2.1-40 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-41 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-42 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-43 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-44 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-45 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-46 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-47 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-48 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-49 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-50 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-51 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-52 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-53 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-54 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity AnalysIS)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-55 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-56 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-57 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-58 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-59 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-60 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-61 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-62 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-63 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-64 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-65 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-66 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-67 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-68 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-69 Compartment Temperature 1.4ft2/Loop, 102% Power FCV Failure Figure 6.2.1-70 Lower Compartment Pressure 1.4 Ft2 Loop, 102% Power FCV Failure Figure 6.2.1-71 Compartment Temperature 0.35 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Runout Figure 6.2.1-72 Lower Compartment Pressure 0.35 Ft2 Split, 30% Power Afw Runout Figure 6.2.1-73 Compartment Temperature 0.6 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Runout Figure 6.2.1-74 Lower Compartment Pressure 0.6 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Fail Figure 6.2.1-75 Figure 6.2.1-76 Figure 6.2.1-77 Figure 6.2.1-78 Figure 6.2.1-79 Figure 6.2.1-80 Figure 6.2.1-81 Steam Generator Enclosure Nodalization Figure 6.2.1-82 Flow Paths For TMD Steam Generator Enclosure Short-term Pressure Analysis List of Figures 6-xiv
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.2.1-83 Pressure Transient Between Break Element And Upper Compartment (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-84 Differential Pressure Transient Across The Steam Generator Vessel (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-85 Differential Pressure Transient Cross The Steam Generator Vessel (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-86 Pressure Versus Time For The Break Element (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-86a Upper Compartment Pressure Versus Time (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-87 Nodalization Pressure Enclosure Analysis Figure 6.2.1-88 Pressure Transient Between Break Element And Upper Compartment (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-89 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-90 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclo-sure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-91 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-92 Pressure Versus Time For The Break Element (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Figure 6.2.2-1 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Flow Diagram Containment Spray System Figure 6.2.2-2 Containment Spray Pump Performance Curves Figure 6.2.2-3 Reactor Bldgs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Piping Plan of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header A Figure 6.2.2-4 Powerhouse-Auxiliary & Reactor Bldgs Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Piping Figure 6.2.2-5 Reactor Blogs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Pip-ing Plan of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header B Figure 6.2.2-6 Reactor Bldgs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Pip-ing Section of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header B Figure 6.2.3-1 Typical Mechanical Penetration Seaks Figure 6.2.3-2 Typical Purge Penetration Arrangement Figure 6.2.3-3 Typical Electrical Penetrations Figure 6.2.3-4 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-5 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-6 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-7 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-8 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-9 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-10 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Figure 6.2.3-11 Reactor Building - Units 1 & 2 Flow Diagram - Heating and Ventilation List of Figures 6-xv
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Air Flow Figure 6.2.3-12 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Logic Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment System Figure 6.2.3-13 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Logic Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment Figure 6.2.3-14 Powerhouse Unit 1 Electrical Logic Diagram -Emergency Gas Treat-ment Figure 6.2.3-15 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment System Figure 6.2.3-15-SH-A Powerhouse Unit 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Emergency Gas Treat-ment Figure 6.2.3-16 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Auxiliary Building -Flow Diagram -Heating
| |
| &Ventilating Air Flow Figure 6.2.3-17 Post-Accident Annulus Pressure and Reactor Unit Vent Flow Rate Transients Figure 6.2.3-18 Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Heating and Ventilating Figure 6.2.3-19 Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Heating and Ventilating Figure 6.2.4-1 Type 1, Main Stearn X-l3A, X-l3B, X-l3C, X-13D Figure 6.2.4-2 Type II, Feedwater X-12A, X-l2B, X-12C, X-12D Figure 6.2.4-3 Type III, Residual Heat Removal Pump Return X-17, Pump Supply X-I07 Figure 6.2.4-4 Type IV and V (Type IV Socket Weld Ends, Type V Butt Weld Ends)
| |
| Figure 6.2.4-5 Type VI and VII (Type VI for Socket Weld SS Process Lines, Type VII for Butt Weld SS Process Lines Figure 6.2.4-6 Type VIII, for Butt Weld C.S. Process Lines Figure 6.2.4-7 Type IX, for SS Process Lines Figure 6.2.4-8 Type X, Instrument Penetrations Figure 6.2.4-9 Type XII, Emergency Sump Figure 6.2.4-10 Type XI, Emergency Sump Figure 6.2.4-11 Type XIII, Ventilation Duct Penetration Figure 6.2.4-12 Type XIV, Equipment Hatch Figure 6.2.4-13 Type XV, Personnel Access Figure 6.2.4-14 Type XVI, Fuel Transfer Tube Figure 6.2.4-15 Type XVII, Thimble Renewal Line Figure 6.2.4-16 Type XVIII, Ice Blowing Line Figure 6.2.4-17 Type XIX, Electrical Penetration Figure 6.2.4-17A Type XX Feedwater Bypass Penetrations X-8A, X-8B, X-8C, X-8D Figure 6.2.4-17B Type XXI, Upper And Lower Cont ERCW Supply And Return CCW From Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger and from Pump Odolers Figure 6.2.4-17C Type XXII Multi Line Penetration X-39 Figure 6.2.4-17D Type XXIII Instrument Room Chilled H20 Supply and Return Figure 6.2.4-17E Type XXIV UHI X-l08, X*109 Figure 6.2.4-18 Mechanical Containment Penetrations Figure 6.2.4-19 Powerhouse Reactor Unit 1 & 2 Mechanical Sleeves-Shield Building List of Figures 6-xvi
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.2.4-20 Schematic Diagram of Leakage Paths Figure 6.2.4-21 Electrical Logic Diagram Containment Isolation Figure 6.2.4-22A through 6.2.4-22II Deleted by Amendment 65 Figure 6.2.4-23 Ice Blowing and Negative Return Lines - Blind Flange Details Figure 6.2.5-1 Deleted by Amendment 95 Figure 6.2.5-2 De1eted By Amendment 62 Figure 6.2.5-3 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 - Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Figure 6.2.5-4 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Reactor Building - Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Figure 6.2.5-5 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 - Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Figure 6.2.5-6 Function Flow Block Diagram - Containment Gas Monitor Subsystem Figure 6.2.5-7 Deleted by Amendmen 95 Figure 6.2.5-7a Deleted by Amendment 95 Figure 6.2.5-8 Igniter Locations - Lower Compartment and Dead Ended Compartments Figure 6.2.5-9 Igniter Locations - Lower Compartments Figure 6.2.5-10 Igniter Locations - Upper Plenum and Upper Compartments Figure 6.2.5-11 Igniter Locations - Dome Figure 6.2.5-12 Igniter Locations - Elevation Figure 6.3-1-1 Powerhouse Unit 1 Safety Injection System - Flow Diagram Figure 6.3-1-2 Powerhouse Unit 1 & 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Safety Injection System Figure 6.3-1-2-SH-A Powerhouse Unit 1 Electrical Control Diagram - Safety Injection Sys-tem Figure 6.3-1-3 Powerhouse Unit 1 Electrical Control Diagram Safety Injection Figure 6.3-1-3-SH-A Powerhouse Unit 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Safety Injection Figure 6.3-1-3-SH-B Powerhouse Unit 1 Electrical Control Diagram - Safety Injection Figure 6.3-2 Performance Curves For The Residual Heat Removal Pumps Figure 6.3-3 Performance Curves For The Safety Injection Pumps Figure 6.3-4 Performance Curves For The Charging Pumps Figure 6.3-5 Sheets 1 and 2, deleted by Amendment 63 Figure 6.3-6 Containment Sump Figure 6.5-1 Ice Condenser Figure 6.7-1 Isometric of Ice Condenser Figure 6.7-2 Floor Structure Figure 6.7-3 Wear Slab Top Surface Area Showing Typical Coolant Piping Layout Figure 6.7-4 Lattice Frame Orientation Figure 6.7-5 Load Distribution for Tangential Seismic and Blowdown Loads in Analytical Model Figure 6.7-6 Lattice Frame Figure 6.7-7 Lattice Frame Analysis Model List of Figures 6-xvii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.7-8 Typical Bottom Ice Basket Assembly Figure 6.7-9 Combinations of Concentric Axial Load and Distribution Load That Will Cause Failure of a Perforated Metal Ice Condenser Basket Material Figure 6.7-10 Crane Assembly Figure 6.7-11 Crane Rail Assembly Figure 6.7-12 Refrigerant Cycle Diagram Figure 6.7-13 Glycol Cycle to Each Containment Figure 6.7-14 Schematic Flow Diagrams of Air Cooling Cycle Figure 6.7-15 Air Handling Unit Support Structure Figure 6.7-16 Flow Area - Pressure Differential Figure 6.7-17 Lower Inlet Door Assembly Figure 6.7-18 Details of Lower Inlet Door Showing Hinge, Proportioning Mechanism Limit Switches and Seals Figure 6.7-19 Inlet Door Frame Assembly Figure 6.7-20 Inlet Door Panel Assembly Figure 6.7-21 Lower Inlet Door Shock Absorber Assembly Figure 6.7-22 Four Loop Ice Condenser Lower Support Structure Conceptual Plan and Sections Figure 6.7-23 Four Loop Ice Condenser Lower Support Structure General Assembly Figure 6.7-24 ANTS Model Assembly Figure 6.7-25 Finite Element Model of Ported Frame Figure 6.7-26 Schematic Diagram of Forces Applied to Three Pier Lower Support Structure Figure 6.7-27 Force Transient Hot Leg Break Figure 6.7-28 DLF Spectra Hot Leg Break Force Transient Figure 6.7-29 Top Deck Test Assembly Figure 6.7-30 Details of Top Deck Door Assembly Figure 6.7-31 Intermediate Deck Door Assembly Figure 6.7-32 Air Distribution Duct Figure 6.7-33 Air Distribution Duct Figure 6.7-34 Phase Diagram for Na2 B4 07.10 H2O/Water System at One Atmo-sphere Figure 6.7-35 Ice Bed Compaction Versus Time Figure 6.7-36 Test Ice Bed Compaction Versus Ice Bed Height Figure 6.7-37 Total Ice Compaction Versus Ice Bed Height Figure 6.7-38 Ice Condenser RTD location Figure 6.7-39 Block Diagram Ice Condenser Temperature Monitoring System Figure 6.7-40 Door Monitoring Zones Figure 6.7-41 Powerhouse Unit 1 Wiring Diagram Ice Condenser System Schematic Diagrams Figure 6.7-42 Deleted by Amendment 89 Figure 6.7-43 Deleted by Amendment 89 Figure 6.7-44 Model of Horizontal Lattice Frame Structure Figure 6.7-45 Group of Six Interconnected Lattice Frames List of Figures 6-xviii
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title Figure 6.7-46 Lattice Frame lce Basket Gap Figure 6.7-47 Typical Displacement Time Histories for l2-Foot Basket with End Supports - Pluck Test Figure 6.7-48 Non Linear Dynamic Model Figure 6.7-49 3-Mass Tangential Ice Basket Model Figure 6.7-50 9-Mass Radial Ice Basket Model Figure 6.7-51 48-Foot Beam Model Figure 6.7-52 Phasing Mass Model of Adjacent Lattice Frame Bays Figure 6.7-53 Phasing Study Model, 1 Level Lattice Frame 300 Degrees Non-Linear Model Figure 6.7-54 Typical Crane Wall Displacement Figure 6.7-55 Typical Ice Basket Displacement Response Figure 6.7-56 Typical Ice Basket Impact Force Response Figure 6.7-57 Typical Crane Wall Panel Load Response Figure 6.7-58 Wall Panel Design Load Distribution Obtained Using the 48-Foot Beam Model Tangential Case Figure 6.7-59 Wall Panel Design Load Distribution Obtained Using the 48-Foot Beam Model Radial Case List of Figures 6-xix
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 LIST OF FIGURES Section Title THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK List of Figures 6-xx
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 06-1_Part_01_of_02_LTR.pdf 6.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES 6.1 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1.1 Metallic Materials 6.1.1.1 Materials Selection and Fabrication Typical material specifications used for the principal pressure retaining applications in components in the Engineered Safety Features (ESF) are listed in Table 6.1-1. All materials utilized are procured in accordance with the material specification requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, plus applicable and appropriate Addenda and Code Cases.
| |
| The welding materials used for joining the ferritic base materials of the ESF conform to, or are equivalent to, ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.17, 5.18, and 5.20. The welding materials used for joining nickel-chromium-iron alloy in similar base material combination and in dissimilar ferritic or austenitic base material combination conform to ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.11 and 5.14. The welding materials used for Joining the austenitic stainless steel base materials conform to ASME Material Specifications SFA 5.4 and 5.9. These materials are tested and qualified to the requirements of the ASME Code, Section III and Section IX rules and are used in procedures which have been qualified to these same rules. The methods utilized to control delta ferrite content in austenitic stainless steel weldments are discussed in Section 5.2.5.7.
| |
| All parts of components in contact with borated water are fabricated of or clad with austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion resistant material. The integrity of the safety-related components of the ESF is maintained during all stages of component manufacture. Austenitic stainless steel is utilized in the final heat treated condition as required by the respective ASME Code Section II material specification for the particular type or grade of alloy. Furthermore, it is required that austenitic stainless steel materials used in the ESF components be handled, protected, stored, and cleaned according to recognized and accepted methods which are designed to minimize contamination which could lead to stress corrosion cracking. The rules covering these controls are stipulated in Westinghouse process specifications, which are discussed in Section 5.2.5.1. Additional information concerning austenitic stainless steel, including the avoidance of sensitization and the prevention of intergranular attack, can be found in Section 5.2.5. No cold worked austenitic stainless steels having yield strengths greater than 90,000 psi are used for components of the ESF within the Westinghouse standard scope.
| |
| Westinghouse supplied components within the containment that would be exposed to core cooling water and containment sprays in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident utilize materials listed in Table 6.1-1. These components are manufactured primarily of stainless steel or other corrosion resistant, high temperature material. The integrity of the materials of construction for ESF equipment when exposed to post design basis accident (DBA) conditions has been evaluated. Post-DBA conditions were ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 conservatively represented by test conditions. The test program[1] performed by Westinghouse considered spray and core cooling solutions of the design chemical compositions, as well as the design chemical compositions contaminated with corrosion and deterioration products which may be transferred to the solution during recirculation. The effects of sodium (free caustic), chlorine (chloride), and fluorine (fluoride) on austenitic stainless steels were considered. Based on the results of this investigation, as well as testing by ORNL and others, the behavior of austenitic stainless steels in the post-DBA environment will be very acceptable. No cracking is anticipated on any equipment even in the presence of postulated levels of contaminants, provided the core cooling and spray solution pH is maintained at an adequate level. The inhibitive properties of alkalinity (hydroxyl ion) against chloride cracking and the inhibitive characteristic of boric acid on fluoride cracking have been demonstrated. Coatings on exposed surfaces within the containment are not subject to breakdown under exposure to the spray solution and can withstand the temperature and pressure expected in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| 6.1.1.2 Composition, Compatibility, and Stability of Containment and Core Spray Coolants The vessels used for storing ESF coolants include the accumulators and the refueling water storage tank.
| |
| The accumulators are carbon steel clad with austenitic stainless steel. Because of the corrosion resistance of these materials, significant corrosive attack on the storage vessels is not expected.
| |
| The accumulators are vessels filled with borated water and pressurized with nitrogen gas. The nominal boron concentration, as boric acid, is 2000 ppm. Samples of the solution in the accumulators are taken periodically for checks of boron concentration.
| |
| Principal design parameters of the accumulators are listed in Table 6.3-1.
| |
| The refueling water storage tank is a source of borated cooling water for injection. The nominal boron concentration, as boric acid, is 2050 ppm, which is below the solubility limit at freezing. The temperature of the refueling water is maintained above freezing.
| |
| Principal design parameters of the refueling mater storage tank are given in Section 9.2.7.
| |
| The ice in the ice condenser is borated by adding sodium tetraborate to the ice. The aqueous solution resulting from the melted ice has a nominal boron concentration of 1900 +100 ppm. In the event of an accident, this solution would be delivered to the containment sump. Containment sump pH is also controlled by the sodium tetraborate in the ice. The pH of the ice is maintained between 9.0 and 9.5, which results in a sump pH of approximately 8.1.
| |
| Information concerning hydrogen release by the corrosion of containment metals and the control of the hydrogen and combustible gas concentrations within the containment following a LOCA is discussed in Section 6.2.5.
| |
| 6.1-2 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.1.2 Organic Materials For paints and coatings inside containment, the conformance with Regulatory Guide 1.54 is described in Section 6.1.4.
| |
| Organic materials within the primary containment are identified and quantified according to the following categories: electrical insulation, surface coatings, ice condenser equipment, and identification tags for valves and instruments. There is no wood or asphalt inside the containment.
| |
| The information in this section is based on a single reactor unit.
| |
| 6.1.2.1 Electrical Insulation Material Mass, lbs Silicone Rubber 7430 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) 3850 Polyethylene Type Materials:
| |
| Polyethylene 2920 Hypalon (chlorsulfonated polyethylene) 390 Polyolefins 200 Semiconducting plastic 370 6.1.2.2 Surface Coatings Material Mass, lbs Concrete Surfaces:
| |
| Epoxy 2070 Phenolic-epoxy 300 Steel Surfaces:
| |
| Phenolic-epoxy 1810 Steel surfaces are undercoated with a 2-mil thickness of a coating that is 85% zinc in a silicate binder (carbozinc 11).
| |
| Protective coatings for use in the reactor containment have been evaluated as to their suitability in post-DBA conditions. Tests have shown that the epoxy and modified phenolic systems are the most desirable of the generic types evaluated for in-containment use. This evaluation considered resistance to high temperature and chemical conditions anticipated following a LOCA, as well as high radiation resistance[2].
| |
| ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.1.2.3 Ice Condenser Equipment Material Mass, lbs Lower Door Seals (Styrene butadiene) 530 Equipment Access Door Seals (Natural rubber) 5 Vent curtain (Laminated mylar) 5 Ice Condenser Seal:
| |
| Natural Rubber 600 Nylon 360 Miscellaneous Washers:
| |
| Noryl SEIOO (phenylene oxide) 50 Gasketing Material:
| |
| Neoprene 5060 Drain Line Expansion Joint 6.1.2.4 Identification Tags Material Mass, lbs Valves:
| |
| ABS (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) 50 Instruments:
| |
| ABS (acylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) 30 6.1.2.5 Valves and Instruments within Containment Diaphragms, O-Rings, Solenoid Seals:
| |
| Buna-N (acrylonitrile-butadiene) 130 6.1.2.6 Heating and Ventilating Door Seals Neoprene (chloroprene) 100 6.1.3 Post-Accident Chemistry Following a LOCA, the emergency core cooling solution recirculated in containment is composed of boric acid (H3BO3) from the reactor coolant, refueling water storage tank (RWST), cold leg accumulators and affected injection piping, lithium hydroxide (LiOH) from the reactor coolant and sodium tetraborate (Na2B4O7) from the ice in the ice condenser.
| |
| 6.1-4 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.1.3.1 Boric Acid, H3BO3 Boric acid at a maximum concentration of 2000 ppm boron, is found in the reactor coolant loop (4 loops, reactor vessel, pressurizer), and boric acid at a maximum concentration of 2100 ppm boron is found in the cold leg injection accumulators, refueling water storage tank, and associated piping. This limit may be exceeded during Mode 6 operation. These subsystems, when at maximum volume, represent a total mass of boric acid in the amount of 49,254 pounds.
| |
| 6.1.3.2 Lithium Hydroxide Lithium Hydroxide at a maximum concentration of 7.6 ppm lithium is found in the reactor coolant system for pH control.
| |
| 6.1.3.3 Sodium Tetraborate Sodium tetraborate is an additive in the ice stored in the ice condenser for the purpose of maintaining containment sump pH of at least 8.1 after all the ice has melted.
| |
| The minimum analysis amount of ice in storage is 2.125 x 106 lbs. Boric acid and NaOH are formed during ice melt following a LOCA according to the following equation:
| |
| Na 2 B 4 O 7 + 7H 2 O 2NaOH + 4H 3 BO 3 6.1.3.4 Final Post-Accident Chemistry In the event of an accident, the final soluble acid and soluble base concentrations for a mixture of all containment and core cooling solutions have been calculated to be 5.13 x 105 moles (boric acid equivalent) and 7.6 x 104 moles (sodium hydroxide equivalent),
| |
| respectively. These calculations are based on the acid and base inventories of boric acid, and sodium tetraborate.
| |
| The final post-accident sump pH is approximately 8.1. The estimated time history of the sump pH is shown in Figure 6.1-1.
| |
| 6.1.4 Degree of Compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.54 for Paints and Coatings Inside Containment TVA is committed to adhere to Appendix B of 10 CFR 50 and ANSI N45.2 as required to produce a quality end product. Basically, it is TVA's position that the Quality Assurance Program (QA) for protective coatings inside the containment should control four activities in the coating program. The four major areas to be controlled are:
| |
| (1) The coating material itself, by extending requirements on the manufacturing process and qualification of coating systems through the use of applicable portions of ANSI Standards N101.2 and N512.
| |
| (2) The preparation of the surface to which coatings are to be applied.
| |
| ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (3) The inspection process.
| |
| (4) The application of the coating systems.
| |
| All four of these controlled activities have appropriate documentation and records to meet Appendix B requirements.
| |
| TVA agrees with Regulatory Guide 1.54, except the endorsement to ANSI N101.4 in paragraph C.1.
| |
| TVA's protective coating application program within the containment is in conformance with Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and ANSI N45.2. In addition, applicable provisions found in ANSI N101.4 have been incorporated into TVA surface preparation, coating application/inspection specifications, and coating QA procedures.
| |
| Controlled coatings are accounted for and maintained within the limits specified in the analysis for containment coatings and in the transport analysis for the zone of influence. The zone of influence is defined as that area at the water surface into which a falling paint particle does not settle to the bottom, but rather, is transported to the trash rack screens by the flow of water.
| |
| REFERENCES (1) WCAP-7803, "Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steel in Post Hypothetical Loss of Coolant Environment."
| |
| (2) WCAP-7825, "Evaluation of Protective Coatings for Use in Reactor Containment."
| |
| 6.1-6 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.1-1 Engineered Safety Feature Materials Valves Bodys SA182 Type F316 or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M Bonnets SA182 Type F316 or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M Discs SA182 Type F316 or SA564 Gr 630 Cond 1100°F Heat Treat-ment or SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M Pressure Retaining Bolting SA453 Gr 660 Pressure Retaining Nuts SA453 Gr 660 or SA194 Gr 6 Auxiliary Heat Exchangers Heads SA240 Type 304 Nozzle Necks SA182 Gr F304 Tubes SA 213 TP304 Tube Sheets SA182 Gr F304 Shells SA240 and SA312 Type 304 Auxiliary Pressure Vessels, Tanks, Filters, etc.
| |
| Shells & Heads 3SA351 Gr CF8A and SA240 Type 304 or SA264 Clad Plate of SA516 Gr 70 with SA240 Type 304L Clad - Stainless Steel Weld Overlay A-8 Analysis Flanges & Nozzles SA182 Gr F304 or SA105 with SA240 Type 304 and Stainless Steel Weld Overlay A-8 Analysis Piping SA312 and SA240 TP304 or TP316 Seamless Pipe Fittings SA403 WP304 Seamless Closure Bolting & Nuts SA193 Gr B7 and SA194 Gr 2H ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.1-1 Engineered Safety Feature Materials (Continued)
| |
| Auxiliary Pumps Pump Casing & Heads SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M, SA182 Gr F304 or F316 Flanges & Nozzles SA182 Gr F304 or F316, SA403 Gr WP316L Seamless Stuffing or Packing Box Cover SA351 Gr CF8 or CF8M, SA240 TP304 or TP316 Closure Bolting & Nuts SA193 Gr B6, B7 or B8M and SA194 Gr2H or Gr8M, SA193 Gr B6, B7 or B8M; SA453 Gr 660; and Nuts, SA194 Gr 2H, Gr 8M, and Gr 6 6.1-8 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.1-1 Containment Sump pH Versus Time y
| |
| ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS 6.1-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6.1-10 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MATERIALS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2.1 Containment Functional Design 6.2.1.1 Design Bases 6.2.1.1.1 Primary Containment Design Bases The containment is designed to assure that an acceptable upper limit of leakage of radioactive material is not exceeded under design basis accident conditions. For purposes of integrity, the containment may be considered as the containment vessel and containment isolation system. This structure and system are directly relied upon to maintain containment integrity. The emergency gas treatment system and Reactor Building function to keep out-leakage minimal (the Reactor Building also serves as a protective structure), but are not factors in determining the design leak rate.
| |
| The containment is specifically designed to meet the intent of the applicable General Design Criteria listed in Section 3.1. This section, Chapter 3, and other portions of Chapter 6 present information showing conformance of design of the containment and related systems to these criteria.
| |
| The ice condenser is designed to limit the containment pressure below the design pressure for all reactor coolant pipe break sizes up to and including a double-ended severance. Characterizing the performance of the ice condenser requires consideration of the rate of addition of mass and energy to the containment as well as the total amounts of mass and energy added. Analyses have shown that the accident which produces the highest blowdown rate into a condenser containment will result in the maximum containment pressure rise; that accident is the double-ended guillotine or split severance of a reactor coolant pipe. The design basis accident for containment analysis based on sensitivity studies is therefore the double-ended guillotine severance of a reactor coolant pipe at the reactor coolant pump suction. Post-blowdown energy releases can also be accommodated without exceeding containment design pressure.
| |
| The functional design of the containment is based upon the following accident input source term assumptions and conditions:
| |
| (1) The design basis blowdown energy of 318 x 106 Btu and mass of 493 x 103 lb put into the containment.
| |
| (2) A reactor power of 3579 MWt (plus 2% allowance for calorimetric error).
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (3) The minimum engineered safety features are (i.e., the single failure criterion applied to each safety system) comprised of the following:
| |
| (a) The ice condenser which condenses steam generated during a LOCA, thereby limiting the pressure peak inside the containment (see Section 6.7).
| |
| (b) The containment isolation system which closes those fluid penetrations not serving accident-consequence limiting purposes (see Section 6.2.4).
| |
| (c) The containment spray system which sprays cool water into the containment atmosphere, thereby limiting the pressure peak (particularly in the long term - see Section 6.2.2).
| |
| (d) The emergency gas treatment system (EGTS) which produces a slightly negative pressure within the annulus, thereby precluding out-leakage and relieving the post-accident thermal expansion of air in the annulus (see Section 6.5.1).
| |
| (e) The air return fans which return air to the lower compartment.
| |
| Consideration is given to subcompartment differential pressure resulting from a design basis accident discussed in Sections 3.8.3.3, 6.2.1.3.9, and 6.2.1.3.4. If a design basis accident were to occur due to a pipe rupture in these relatively small volumes, the pressure would build up at a faster rate than in the containment, thus imposing a differential pressure across the wall of these structures.
| |
| Parameters affecting the assumed capability for post-accident pressure reduction are discussed in Section 6.2.1.3.3.
| |
| Three events that may result in an external pressure on the containment vessel have been considered:
| |
| (1) Rupture of a process pipe where it passes through the annulus.
| |
| (2) Inadvertent air return fan operation during normal operation.
| |
| (3) Inadvertent containment spray system initiation during normal operation.
| |
| The design of the guard pipe portion of hot penetrations is such that any process pipe leakage in the annulus is returned to the containment. All process piping which has potential for annulus pressurization upon rupture is routed through hot penetrations.
| |
| Section 6.2.4 discusses hot penetrations.
| |
| Inadvertent air return fan operation during normal operation opens the ice condenser lower inlet doors, which in turn, results in sounding an alarm in the MCR. Even with a hypothetical situation in which the operator cannot shut off the air return fan, the 6.2-2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 operator has the capability of opening an eight inch vacuum relief line (Penetration X-8O, Section 6.2.4) to relieve the net external design pressure.
| |
| The logic and control circuits of the containment spray system are such that inadvertent containment spray would not take place with a single failure. The spray pump must start and the isolation valve must open before there can be any spray. In addition, the Watts Bar containment is so designed that even if an inadvertent spray occurs, containment integrity is preserved without the use of a vacuum relief.
| |
| The containment spray system is automatically actuated by a hi-hi containment pressure signal from the solid state protection system (SSPS). To prevent inadvertent automatic actuation, four comparator outputs, one from each protection set are processed through two coincidence gates. Both coincidence gates are required to have at least two high inputs before the output relays, which actuate the containment spray system, are energized. Separate output relays are provided for the pump start logic and discharge valve open logic. Additional protection is provided by an interlock between the pump and discharge valve, which requires the pump to be running before the discharge valve will automatically open.
| |
| Section 3.8.2 describes the structural design of the containment vessel. The containment vessel is designed to withstand a net external pressure of 2.0 psi. The containment vessel is designed to withstand the maximum expected net external pressure in accordance with ASME Boiler and Pressure and Vessel Code Section III, paragraph NE-7116.
| |
| 6.2.1.2 Primary Containment System Design The containment consists of a containment vessel and a separate Shield Building enclosing an annulus. The containment vessel is a freestanding, welded steel structure with a vertical cylinder, hemispherical dome, and a flat circular base. The Shield Building is a reinforced concrete structure similar in shape to the containment vessel. The design of these structures is described in Section 3.8.
| |
| The design internal pressure for the containment is 13.5 psig, and the design temperature is 250°F. The design basis leakage rate is 0.25%/24 hr. The design methods to assure integrity of the containment internal structures and sub-compartments from accident pressure pulses are described in Section 3.8.
| |
| 6.2.1.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.1.3.1 Primary Containment Evaluation (1) The leaktightness aspect of the secondary containment is discussed in Section 6.2.5. The primary containment's leaktightness does not depend on the operation of any continuous monitoring or compressor system. The leak testing of the primary containment and its isolation system is discussed in Section 6.2.6.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (2) The acceptance criteria for the leaktightness of the primary containment are such that at containment design pressure, there is a 25% margin between the acceptable maximum leakage rate and the maximum permissible leakage rate.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.2 General Description of Containment Pressure Analysis The time history of conditions within an ice condenser containment during a postulated loss of coolant accident can be divided into two periods for calculation purposes:
| |
| (1) The initial reactor coolant blowdown, which for the largest assumed pipe break occurs in approximately 10 seconds.
| |
| (2) The post blowdown phase of the accident which begins following the blowdown and extends several hours after the start of the accident.
| |
| During the first few seconds of the blowdown period of the reactor coolant system, containment conditions are characterized by rapid pressure and temperature transients. It is during this period that the peak transient pressures, differential pressures, temperature and blowdown loads occur. To calculate these transients a detailed spatial and short time increment analysis was necessary. This analysis was performed with the TMD computer code with the calculation time of interest extending up to a few seconds following the accident initiation.
| |
| Physically, tests at the ice condenser Waltz Mill test facility have shown that the blowdown phase represents that period of time in which the lower compartment air and a portion of the ice condenser air are displaced and compressed into the upper compartment and the remainder of the ice condenser. The containment pressure at or near the end of blowdown is governed by this air compression process. The containment compression ratio calculation is described in Section 6.2.1.3.4.
| |
| Containment pressure during the post blowdown phase of the accident is calculated with the LOTIC code which models the containment structural heat sinks and containment safeguards systems.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.3 Long-Term Containment Pressure Analysis Early in the ice condenser development program it was recognized that there was a need for modeling of long-term ice condenser containment performance. It was realized that the model would have to have capabilities comparable to those of the dry containment (COCO) model. These capabilities would permit the model to be used to solve problems of containment design and optimize the containment and safeguards systems. This has been accomplished in the development of the LOTIC code[1].
| |
| The model of the containment consists of five distinct control volumes; the upper compartment, the lower compartment, the portion of the ice bed from which the ice has melted, the portion of the ice bed containing unmelted ice, and the dead ended compartments. The ice condenser control volume with unmelted ice is further 6.2-4 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 subdivided into six subcompartments to allow for maldistribution of break flow to the ice bed.
| |
| The conditions in these compartments are obtained as a function of time by the use of fundamental equations solved through numerical techniques. These equations are solved for three distinct phases in time. Each phase corresponds to a distinct physical characteristic of the problem. Each of these phases has a unique set of simplifying assumptions based on test results from the ice condenser test facility. These phases are the blowdown period, the depressurization period, and the long term.
| |
| The most significant simplification of the problem is the assumption that the total pressure in the containment is uniform. This assumption is justified by the fact that after the initial blowdown of the reactor coolant system, the remaining mass and energy released from this system into the containment are small and very slowly changing. The resulting flow rates between the control volumes will also be relatively small. These small flow rates then are unable to maintain significant pressure differences between the compartments.
| |
| In the control volumes, which are always assumed to be saturated, steam and air are assumed to be uniformly mixed and at the control volume temperature. The air is considered a perfect gas, and the thermodynamic properties of steam are taken from the ASME steam table.
| |
| For the purpose of calculation, the condensation of steam is assumed to take place in a condensing node located between the two control volumes in the ice storage compartment.
| |
| Containment Pressure Calculation The following are the major input assumptions used in the LOTIC analysis for the pump suction pipe rupture case with the steam generators considered as an active heat source for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant containment:
| |
| (1) Minimum safeguards are employed in all calculations, e.g., one of two spray pumps and one of two spray heat exchangers; one of two RHR pumps and one of two RHR heat exchangers providing flow to the core; one of two safety injection pumps and one of two centrifugal charging pumps; and one of two air return fans.
| |
| (2) 2.125 x 106 lbs. of ice initially in the ice condenser which is at 15°F. (This is less than the Technical Specification limit.)
| |
| (3) The blowdown, reflood, and post reflood mass and energy releases described in Section 6.2.1.3.6 were used.
| |
| (4) Blowdown and post-blowdown ice condenser drain temperatures of 190°F and 130°F are used[5].
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 (5) Nitrogen from the accumulators in the amount of 2218 lbs. included in the calculations.
| |
| (6) Essential raw cooling water temperature of 85°F is used on the spray heat exchanger and the component cooling heat exchanger.
| |
| (7) The air return fan is effective 10 minutes after the transient is initiated. The actual air return fan initiation can take place in 9 + 1 minutes, with initiation as early as 8 minutes not adversely affecting the analysis results.
| |
| (8) No maldistribution of steam flow to the ice bed is assumed.
| |
| (9) No ice condenser bypass is assumed. (This assumption depletes the ice in the shortest time and is thus conservative.)
| |
| (10) The initial conditions in the containment are a temperature of 100°F in the lower and dead-ended volumes and a temperature of 85°F in the upper volume. All volumes are at a pressure of 0.3 psig and a 10% relative humidity.
| |
| (11) A containment spray pump flow of 4000 gpm is used in the upper compartment. A diesel loading sequence for the containment sprays to energize and come up to full flow and head in 135 seconds has been used in this analysis. This initial time sequence modification was made to ensure that a frequency transient did not occur for a simultaneous LOCA and loss of offsite power (LOOP) as desired by NRC Regulatory Guide 1.9, Section C4.
| |
| Subsequent analysis has changed the loading sequence to 221 seconds.
| |
| However, this did not significantly affect the results obtained with the 135-second delay. It is also noted that the calculated CSS flow rate is 4550 gpm, which bounds the 4000 gpm flow rate used in the analysis and, being conservative, offsets any effect due to the sequence delay change.
| |
| (12) A residual spray (2000 gpm) is used starting 1 hour after the transient is initiated. The residual heat removal pump and spray pump take suction from the sump during recirculation.
| |
| The minimum time at which the RHR pumps can be diverted to the RHR sprays is specified in the plant operating procedures as one hour after the accident. A discussion of the core cooling capability of the emergency core cooling system is given in Section 6.3.1 for this mode of operation.
| |
| (13) Containment structural heat sink data is found in Table 6.2.1-1.
| |
| (14) The operation of one containment spray heat exchanger (UA = 2.446 x 106 Btu/hr-°F) for containment cooling and the operation of one RHR heat exchanger (UA = 1.61 x 106 Btu/hr-°F) for core cooling.
| |
| (15) The air return fan returns air at a rate of 40,000 cfm from the upper to lower compartment.
| |
| 6.2-6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (16) An active sump volume of 51000 ft3 is used.
| |
| (17) The pump flowrates vs. time given in Table 6.2.1-2 were used. (These flow values reflect ECCS pumps at runout against the design containment pressure, using the minimum composite pump curves shown in Figures 6.3-2, 6.3-3, and 6.3-4, which are degraded by 5% and bound what is achievable in the plant. Switchover times from injection to recirculation that are achievable in the plant for each ECCS pump are also conservative in the analysis.)
| |
| (18) A power rating of 102% of licensed power (3425 MWt) is assumed, but not explicitly modeled. [Decay heat is based on a reactor power of 3579 MWt
| |
| (+2%) for mass and energy release computations. See Section 6.2.1.3.6.]
| |
| With these assumptions, the heat removal capability of the containment is sufficient to absorb the energy releases and still keep the maximum calculated pressure well below design.
| |
| The following plots are provided:
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-1, Containment Pressure Transient, Figure 6.2.1-2, Upper and Lower Compartment Temperature Transients, Figure 6.2.1-3, Active and Inactive Sump Temperature Transient, Figure 6.2.1-4, Ice Melt Transient.
| |
| Tables 6.2.1-3 and 6.2.1-4 give energy accountings at various points in the transient.
| |
| As can be seen from Figure 6.2.1-1 the maximum calculated Containment pressure is 11.21 psig, occurring at approximately 3600.9 seconds.
| |
| Also, a parameter study of the ice mass was performed. These results are presented in Figure 6.2.1-4A.
| |
| Structural Heat Removal Provision is made in the containment pressure analysis for heat storage in interior and exterior walls. Each wall is divided into a number of nodes. For each node, a conservation of energy equation expressed in finite difference forms accounts for transient conduction into and out of the node and temperature rise of the node. Table 6.2.1-1 is a summary of the containment structural heat sinks used in the analysis. The material property data used is found in Table 6.2.1-5.
| |
| The heat transfer coefficient to the containment structures is based primarily on the work of Tagami. An explanation of the manner of application is given in Reference [3].
| |
| When applying the Tagami correlations a conservative limit was placed on the lower compartment stagnant heat transfer coefficients. They were limited to 72 Btu/hr-ft2.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 This corresponds to a steam-air ratio of 1.4 according to the Tagami correlation. The imposition of this limitation is to restrict the use of the Tagami correlation within the test range of steam-air ratios where the correlation was derived.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.4 Short-Term Blowdown Analysis TMD Code - Short-Term Analysis (1) Introduction The basic performance of the ice condenser reactor containment system has been demonstrated for a wide range of conditions by the Waltz Mill Ice Condenser Test Program. These results have clearly shown the capability and reliability of the ice condenser concept to limit the Containment pressure rise subsequent to a hypothetical loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| To supplement this experimental proof of performance, a mathematical model has been developed to simulate the ice condenser pressure transients. This model, encoded as computer program TMD (Transient Mass Distribution), provides a means for computing pressures, temperatures, heat transfer rates, and mass flow rates as a function of time and location throughout the containment. This model is used to compute pressure differences on various structures within the containment as well as the distribution of steam flow as the air is displaced from the lower compartment.
| |
| Although the TMD code can calculate the entire blowdown transient, the peak pressure differences on various structures occur within the first few seconds of the transient.
| |
| (2) Analytical Models (No Entrainment)
| |
| The mathematical modeling in TMD is similar to that of the SATAN blowdown code in that the analytical solution is developed by considering the conservation equations of mass, momentum and energy and the equation of state, together with the control volume technique for simulating spatial variation. The governing equations for TMD are given in Reference [4].
| |
| The moisture entrainment modifications to the TMD code are discussed, in detail, in Reference [4]. These modifications comprise incorporating the additional entrainment effects into the momentum and energy equations.
| |
| As part of the review of the TMD code, additional effects are considered.
| |
| Changes to the analytical model required for these studies are described in Reference [4].
| |
| 6.2-8 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 These studies consist of:
| |
| (a) Spatial acceleration effects in ice bed (b) Liquid entrainment in ice beds (c) Upper limit on sonic velocity (d) Variable ice bed loss coefficient (e) Variable door response (f) Wave propagation effects Additionally the TMD code has been modified to account for fluid compressibility effects in the high Mach number subsonic flow regime.
| |
| Experimental Verification The performance of the TMD code was verified against the 1/24 scale air tests and the 1968 Waltz Mill tests. For the 1/24 scale model the TMD code was utilized to calculate flow rates to compare against experimental results. The effect of increased nodalization was also evaluated. The Waltz Mill test comparisons involved a reexamination of test data. In conducting the reanalyses, representation of the 1968 Waltz Mill test was reviewed with regard to parameters such as loss coefficients and blowdown time history. The details of this information are given in Reference [4].
| |
| The Waltz Mill Ice Condenser Blowdown Test Facility was reactivated in 1973 to verify the ice condenser performance with the following redesigned plant hardware scaled to the test configuration:
| |
| (1) Perforated metal ice baskets and new design couplings.
| |
| (2) Lattice frames sized to provide the correct loss coefficient relative to plant design.
| |
| (3) Lower support beamed structure and turning vanes sized to provide the correct turning loss relative to the plant design.
| |
| (4) No ice baskets in the lower ice condenser plenum opposite the inlet doors.
| |
| The result of these tests was to confirm that conclusions derived from previous Waltz Mill tests have not been significantly changed by the redesign of plant hardware. The TMD Code has, as a result of the 1973 test series, been modified to match ice bed heat transfer performance. Detailed information on the 1973 Waltz Mill test series is found in Reference [5].
| |
| Application to Plant Design (General Description)
| |
| As described in Reference [4], the control volume technique is used to spatially represent the containment. The containment is divided into 50 elements to give a detailed representation of the local pressure transient on the containment shell and internal concrete structures. This division of the containment is similar for all ice condenser plants.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 The Watts Bar plant containment has been divided into 50 elements or compartments as shown in Figures 6.2.1.5, 6.2.1-6, 6.2.1-7, and 6.2.1-8. The interconnections between containment elements in the TMD code is shown schematically in Figure 6.2.1-9. Flow resistance and inertia are lumped together in the flow paths connecting the elements shown. The division of the lower compartments into 6 volumes occurs at the points of greatest flow resistance, i.e., the four steam generators, pressurizer and refueling cavity.
| |
| Each of these lower compartment sections delivers flow through doors into a section behind the doors and below the ice bed. Each vertical section of the ice bed is, in turn, divided into three elements. The upper plenum between the top of the ice bed and the upper doors is represented by an element. Thus, a total of thirty elements (Elements 7 through 24 and 38 through 49 are used to simulate the ice condenser). The six elements at the top of the ice bed between bed and upper doors deliver to element number 25 the upper compartment. Note that cross flow in the ice bed is not accounted for in the analysis; this yields the most conservative results for the particular calculations described herein. The upper reactor cavity (Element 33) is connected to the lower compartment volumes and provides cross flow for pressure equalization of the lower compartments. The less active compartments, called dead-ended compartments (Elements 26 through 32 and 34 through 37) outside the crane wall are pressurized by ventilation openings through the crane wall into the fan compartments.
| |
| For each element in the TMD network the volume, initial pressure and initial temperature conditions are specified. The ice condenser elements have additional inputs of mass of ice, heat transfer area and condensate layer length. For each flow path between elements flow resistance is specified as a loss coefficient "K" or a fraction loss "L/D" or a combination of the two based on the flow area specified between elements. Friction factor, friction factor length and hydraulic diameter are specified for the friction loss.
| |
| Additionally, input for each flow path includes the area ratio (minimum area/maximum area) which is used to account for compressibility effects across flow path contractions.
| |
| The code input for each flow path is the flow path length used in the momentum equation. The ice condenser loss coefficients have been based on the 1/4-scale tests representative of the current ice condenser geometry. The test loss coefficient was increased to include basket roughness effects and to include intermediate and top deck pressure losses. The loss coefficient is based on removal of door port flow restrictors. To better represent short term transients effects, the opening characteristics of the lower, intermediate, and top deck ice condenser doors have been modeled in the TMD code. The containment geometric data for the elements and flow paths used in the TMD code is confirmed to agree with the actual design by TVA and Westinghouse. An initial containment pressure of 0.3 psig was assumed in the analysis. Initial containment pressure variation about the assumed 0.3 psig value has only a slight affect on the initial pressure peak and the compression ratio pressure peak. TMD input data is given in Tables 6.2.1-6 and 6.2.1-7.
| |
| The reactor coolant blowdown rates used in these cases are based on the SATAN analysis of a double-ended rupture of either a hot or a cold leg reactor coolant pipe 6.2-10 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 utilizing a discharge coefficient of 1.0. The models and assumptions used to calculate the short-term mass and energy releases are described in Reference [9]. Tables 6.2.1-23 and 6.2.1-24 present the mass and energy release data used for this analysis.
| |
| A number of analyses have been performed to determine the various pressure transients resulting from hot and cold leg reactor coolant pipe breaks in any one of the six lower compartment elements. The analyses were performed using the following assumptions and correlations:
| |
| (1) Flow was limited by the unaugmented critical flow correlation.
| |
| (2) The TMD variable volume door model, which accounts for changes in the volumes of TMD elements as the door opens, was implemented.
| |
| (3) The heat transfer calculation used was based on performance during the 1973-1974 Waltz Mill test series. A higher value of the ELJAC parameter has been used and an upper bound on calculated heat transfer coefficients has been imposed[5].
| |
| (4) One hundred percent moisture entrainment was assumed.
| |
| (5) Compressibility effects due to flow area contractions were modeled.
| |
| Figures 6.2.1-10 and 6.2.1-11 are representative of the typical upper and lower compartment pressure transients that result from a hypothetical double-ended rupture of a reactor coolant pipe for the worst possible location in the lower compartment of the containment; i.e., hot leg and cold leg breaks in Element 1.
| |
| Initial Pressures Results of the analysis for the Watts Bar Plant are presented in Tables 6.2.1-8 through 6.2.1-11. The peak pressures and peak differential pressures resulting from hot and cold leg reactor coolant pipe breaks in each of the six lower compartment control volumes were calculated.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-8 presents the maximum calculated pressure peak for the lower compartment elements resulting from hot and cold leg double ended pipe breaks.
| |
| Generally, the maximum peak pressure within a lower compartment element results when the pipe break occurs in that element. A cold leg break in Element 1 creates the highest pressure peak, also in Element 1, of 18.5 psig.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-9 presents the maximum calculated peak pressure in each of the ice condenser sections resulting from any pipe break location. The maximum peak pressure in each of the ice condenser sections is found in the lower plenum element of the section. The peak pressure was calculated to be 13.9 psig in Element 40.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-10 presents the maximum calculated differential pressures across the operating deck (divider barrier) between the lower compartment elements and the upper compartment. These values are approximately the same as the maximum calculated differential pressure across the lower crane wall between the lower CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 compartment elements and the dead ended volumes surrounding the lower compartment. The peak differential pressure of 16.6 psi was calculated to be between Elements 1 and 25 for a cold leg break.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-11 presents the maximum calculated differential pressures across the upper crane wall between the upper ice condenser elements and the upper compartment. The peak differential of 8.4 psi pressure was calculated to be between Element 7-8-9 and 25 for a hot leg pipe break.
| |
| Consideration is given to the calculation of subcompartment pressures (and pressure differentials) for cases other than the design basis double ended reactor coolant pipe rupture in the lower compartment. Discussion of these analyses is treated in Section 6.2.1.3-9.
| |
| Sensitivity Studies A series of TMD runs for D. C. Cook investigated the sensitivity of peak pressures to variations in individual input parameters for the design basis blowdown rate and 100 percent entrainment. This analysis used a DEHL break in Element 6 of D. C. Cook.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-12 presents the results of this sensitivity study.
| |
| As part of the short-term containment pressure analysis of ice condenser units, the pressure response to both DEHL and DECL breaks are routinely considered for each of the loop compartments.
| |
| Choked Flow Characteristics The data in Figure 6.2.1-12 illustrate the behavior of mass flow rate as a function of upstream and downstream pressures, including the effects of flow choking. The upper plot shows mass flow rate as a function of upstream pressure for various assumed values of downstream pressure. For zero back pressure (Pd = 0), the entire curve represents choked flow conditions with the flow rate approximately proportional to upstream pressure Pu. For higher back pressure, the flow rates are lower until the upstream pressure is high enough to provide choked flow. After the increase in upstream pressure is sufficient to provide flow chokings further increases in upstream pressure cause increases in mass flow rate along the curve for Pd = 0. The key point in this illustration is that flow rate continues to increase with increasing upstream pressure, even after flow choking conditions have been reached. Thus, choking does not represent a threshold beyond which dramatically sharper increases in compartment pressures could be expected because of limitations on flow relief to adjacent compartments.
| |
| The phenomenon of flow choking is more frequently explained by assuming a fixed upstream pressure and examining the dependence of flow rate with respect to decreasing downstream pressure. This approach is illustrated for an assumed upstream pressure of 30 psia as shown in the upper plot with the results plotted vs.
| |
| downstream pressure in the lower plot. For fixed upstream conditions, flow choking represents an upper limit flow rate beyond which further decreases in back pressure do not produce any increase in mass flow rate.
| |
| 6.2-12 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Compression Ratio Analysis As blowdown continues following the initial pressure peak from a double-ended cold leg break, the pressure in the lower compartment again increases, reaching a peak at or before the end of blowdown. The pressure in the upper compartment continues to rise from beginning of blowdown and reaches a peak which is approximately equal to the lower compartment pressure. After blowdown is complete, the steam in the lower compartment continues to flow through the doors into the ice bed compartment and is condensed.
| |
| The primary factor in producing this upper containment pressure peak and, therefore, in determining design pressure, is the displacement of air from the lower compartment into the upper containment. The ice condenser quite effectively performs its function of condensing virtually all the steam that enters the ice beds. Essentially, the only source of steam entering the upper containment is from leakage through the drain holes and other leakage around crack openings in hatches in the operating deck separating the lower and upper portions of the containment building.
| |
| A method of analysis of the compression peak pressure was developed based on the results of full-scale section tests. This method consists of the calculation of the air mass compression ratio, the polytropic exponent for the compression process, and the effect of steam bypass through the operating deck on this compression.
| |
| The compression peak pressure in the upper containment for the Watts Bar plant design is calculated to be 8.2 psig (for an initial air pressure of 0.3 psig). This compression pressure includes the effect of a pressure increase of 0.4 psi from steam bypass and also for the effects of the dead-ended volumes. The nitrogen partial pressure from the accumulators is not included since this nitrogen is not added to the containment until after the compression peak pressure has been reduced, which is after blowdown is completed. This nitrogen is considered in the analysis of pressure decay following blowdown as presented in the long term performance analysis using the LOTIC code. The following sections discuss the major parameters affecting the compression peak. Specifically they are: air compression, steam bypass, blowdown rate, and blowdown energy.
| |
| Air Compression Process Description The volumes of the various containment compartments determine directly the air volume compression ratio. This is basically the ratio of the total active containment air volume to the compressed air volume during blowdown. During blowdown air is displaced from the lower compartment and compressed into the ice condenser beds and into the upper containment above the operating deck. It is this air compression process which primarily determines the peak in containment pressure, following the initial blowdown release. A peak compression pressure of 8.2 psig is based on the Watts Bar Plant design compartment volumes shown in Table 6.2.1-13.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-13 shows the sensitivity of the compression peak pressure with different air compression ratios.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-13
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Methods of Calculation and Results Full-Scale Section Tests The actual Waltz Mill test compression ratios were found by performing air mass balances before the blowdown and at the time of the compression leak pressure, using the results of three full-scale special section tests. These three tests were conducted with an energy input representative of the plant design.
| |
| In the calculation of the mass balance for the ice condenser, the compartment is divided into two sub-volumes; one volume representing the flow channels and one volume representing the ice baskets. The flow channel volume is further divided into four sub-volumes. The partial air pressure and mass in each sub-volume is found from thermocouple readings by assuming that the air is saturated with steam at the measured temperature. From these results, the average temperature of the air in the ice condenser compartment is found, and the volume occupied by the air at the total condenser pressure is found from the equation of state as follows:
| |
| M a 2R a T a 2 V a 2 = ----------------------------- 1 P 2s where:
| |
| Va2 = Volume of ice condenser occupied by air (ft3)
| |
| Ma2 = Mass of air in ice condenser compartment (lb)
| |
| Ta2 = Average temperature of air in ice condenser (°F)
| |
| P2 = Total ice condenser pressure (lb/ft2)
| |
| Ra = Ideal gas constant The partial pressure and mass of air in the lower compartment are found by averaging the temperatures indicated by the thermocouples located in that compartment and assuming saturation conditions. For these three tests, it was found that the partial pressure, and hence the mass of air in the lower compartment, was zero at the time of the compression peak pressure.
| |
| The actual Waltz Mill test compression ratio is then found from the following:
| |
| V1 + V2 + V3 C = -------------------------------- 2 V 3 + V a2 6.2-14 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 where:
| |
| V1 = Lower compartment volume (ft3)
| |
| V2 = Ice condenser compartment volume (ft3)
| |
| V3 = Upper compartment volume (ft3)
| |
| The polytropic exponent for these tests is then found from the measured compression pressure and the compression ratio calculated above. Also considered is the pressure increase that results from the leakage of steam through the deck into the upper compartment.
| |
| The compression peak pressure in the upper compartment for the tests or containment design is then given by:
| |
| P = PO Cr + Pdeck 3 where:
| |
| PO = Initial pressure (psia)
| |
| P = Compression peak pressure (psia)
| |
| Cr = Volume compression ratio n = Polytropic exponent Pdeck = Pressure increase caused by deck leakage (psi)
| |
| Using the method of calculation described above, the compression ratio is calculated for the three full-scale section tests. From the results of the air mass balances, it was found that air occupied 0.645 of the ice condenser compartment volume at the time of peak compression, or V a2 = 0.645 V 2 4 The final compression volume includes the volume of the upper compartment as well as part of the volume of air in the ice condenser. The results of the full-scale section tests (Figure 6.2.1-14) show a variation in steam partial pressure from 100% near the bottom of the ice condenser to essentially zero near the top. The thermocouples and pressure detectors confirm that at the time when the compression peak pressure is reached steam occupies less than half of the volume of the ice condenser. The analytical model used in defining the containment pressure peak uses upper CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-15
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 compartment volume plus 64.5% of the ice condenser air volumes as the final volume.
| |
| This 64.5% value was determined from appropriate test results.
| |
| The calculated volume compression ratios are shown in Figure 6.2.1-15, along with the compression peak pressures for these tests. The compression peak pressure is determined from the measured pressure, after accounting for the deck leakage contribution. From the results shown in Figure 6.2.1-15, the polytropic exponent for these tests is found to be 1.13.
| |
| Plant Case For the Watts Bar design, the volume compression ratio is calculated using Equation 2, modeling the upper plenum as part of the upper compartment, and Table 6.2.1-13 as:
| |
| 1, 109 , 414 C r = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 698, 000 + [ 0.645 x 122, 400 ]
| |
| Cr = 1.43 The peak compression pressure, based on an initial containment pressure of 15.0 psia (0.3 psig), is then given by Equation 3 as:
| |
| P3 = 15.0 (1.43)1.13 + 0.4 P3 = 22.9 psia or 8.2 psig This peak compression pressure includes a pressure increase of 0.4 psi from steam bypass through the deck (see Section 6.2.1.3.5).
| |
| Sensitivity to Blowdown Energy The sensitivity of the upper and lower compartment peak pressure versus blowdown rate as measured from the 1974 Waltz Mill Tests is shown in Figure 6.2.1-16. This figure shows the magnitude of the peak pressure versus the amount of energy released in terms of percentage of RCS energy release rate.
| |
| Percent energy blowdown rate was selected for the plot because energy flow rate more directly relates to volume flow rate and therefore pressure. There are two important effects to note from the peak upper compartment pressure versus blowdown rate: (1) the magnitude of the final peak pressure in the upper compartment is low (about 9 psig) for the plant design DECL blowdown rate; (2) even an increase in this rate up to 141%
| |
| of the blowdown energy rate produces only a small increase in the magnitude of this peak pressure (about 1 psi). The major factor setting the peak pressure reached in the upper compartment is the compression of air displaced by steam from the lower compartment into the upper compartment. The lower compartment initial peak pressure shows a relatively low peak pressure of 12.9 psig for the design basis DECL blowdown rate, and even a substantial increase in blowdown energy rate (141%
| |
| 6.2-16 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 reference initial DECL) would cause an increase in initial peak pressure of only 3 psi.
| |
| The peak pressure in the lower compartment is due mainly to flow resistance caused by displacement of air from the lower compartment into the upper compartment.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.5 Effect of Steam Bypass The sensitivity of the compression peak pressure to deck bypass is shown in Figure 6.2.1-17, which shows that an increase in deck bypass area of 50% would cause an increase of about 0.2 psi in final peak compression pressure. Also, it is important to note that the plant final peak compression pressure of 8.2 psig already includes a contribution of 0.4 psi from the plant deck bypass area of 5 ft2.
| |
| This effect of deck leakage on upper containment pressure has been verified by a series of four special, full-scale section tests. These tests were all identical except different size deck leakage areas were used.
| |
| The results of these tests are given in Figure 6.2.1-18 which includes two curves of test results. Each curve shows the difference in upper compartment pressure between one test and another resulting from a difference in deck leakage area. One curve shows the increase in upper compartment pressure at the end of the boiler blowdown (after the compression peak pressure, at about 50 seconds in these tests), and the second curve shows the increase in upper compartment peak pressure (at about 10 seconds in these tests). It should be noted that the pressure at the end of the blowdown is less than the peak compression ratio pressure occurring at about 10 seconds for reference blowdown test.
| |
| The containment pressure increase due to deck leakage is directly proportional to the total amount of steam leakage into the upper compartment, and the amount of this steam leakage is, in turn, proportional to the amount of steam released from the boiler, less the inventory of steam remaining in the lower compartment. Notably, the increase in upper compartment compression peak pressure is substantially less than the upper compartment pressure increase at the end of blowdown, because the peak compression pressure occurs before the boiler has released all of its energy.
| |
| The calculated maximum pressure rise due to deck leakage (when all of the boiler energy release has occurred) is also shown in Figure 6.2.1-18. The slope of this curve is 0.095 psi/ft2 for the tests and is equivalent to 0.107 psi/ft2 for the plant design. The difference between the two coefficients is due to a small difference in upper compartment volume between the plant design and these tests.
| |
| As shown in Figure 6.2.1-18, the calculated curve for maximum pressure increase at the end of blowdown agrees closely with the measured curve at small deck leakage areas but deviates at larger leakage areas. This deviation apparently results from the condensation of upper compartment steam by the walls of the upper compartment and by the ice at the top of the condenser during the tests. Pressure would also be reduced by heat losses in a plant; however, for conservatism, no credit is taken for this effect.
| |
| As demonstrated by tests, the compression peak pressure in the upper compartment occurs before the boiler releases all of its energy, and the measured increase in peak compression pressure due to increased deck leakage, is proportionately reduced. For CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-17
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 the case of the plant design, the final peak compression pressure is conservatively assumed to occur when the reactor coolant system release is 75% of its total energy.
| |
| This value is selected as a reference value, based on the results of a number of tests conducted with different blowdown rates and total energy releases, as shown in Figure 6.2.1-19. The actual deck leakage coefficient is therefore:
| |
| P 3
| |
| - = 0.107 x 0.75 = 0.080psi/ft 2 A deck The divider barrier including the enclosures over the pressurizer, steam generators and reactor vessel, is designed to provide a reasonably tight seal against leakage.
| |
| Holes are purposely provided in the bottom of the refueling cavity to allow water from sprays in the upper compartment to drain to the sump in the lower compartment.
| |
| Potential leakage paths exist at all the joints between the operating deck and the pump access hatches and reactor vessel enclosure slabs. The total of all deck leakage flow areas is approximately 5 ft2. The effect of this potential leakage path is small and is found to be:
| |
| Pdeck = 5 x 0.080 = 0.4 psi In the event that the reactor coolant system break flow is so small that it would leak through these flow paths without developing sufficient differential pressure (1 lb/ft2) to open the ice condenser doors, steam from the break would slowly pressurize the containment. The containment spray system has sufficient capacity to maintain pressure well below design for this case.
| |
| The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant are geometrically very similar. Some differences between the two plants, are the design pressure, spray flow rates, and a slight difference in thermal ratings. The fact that the spray flow rate is higher for the Sequoyah plant (4750 gpm versus 4000 gpm) is offset by Watts Bar's higher design pressure (15 psig versus 12 psig). The following discussion presents the deck leakage analysis performed for the Sequoyah plant. The purpose of this analysis is only to show the substantial margin which exists between the design deck leakage of 5 ft2 and the tolerable deck leakage. The Sequoyah analysis which shows conservatism by a factor of 7, is more than sufficient for this purpose.
| |
| The method of analysis used to obtain the maximum allowable deck leakage capacity as a function of the primary system break size is as follows.
| |
| During the blowdown transient, steam and air flow through the ice condenser doors and also through the deck bypass area into the upper compartment. For the containment, this bypass, area is composed of two parts, a known leakage area of 2.2 ft2 with a geometric loss coefficient of 1.5 through the deck drainage holes location at the bottom of the refueling canal and an undefined deck leakage area with a conservatively small loss coefficient of 2.5. A resistance network similar to that used to TMD is used to represent 6 lower compartment volumes each with a representative 6.2-18 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 portion of the deck leakage, and the lower inlet door flow resistance and flow area is calculated for small breaks that would only partially open these doors. The coolant blowdown rate as a function of time is used with this flow network to calculate the differential pressures on the lower inlet doors and across the operating deck.
| |
| The resultant deck leakage rate and integrated steam leakage into the upper compartment is then calculated. The lower inlet doors are initially held shut by the cold head of air behind the doors (approximately one pound per square foot). The initial blowdown from a small break opens the doors and removes the cold head on the doors. With the door differential removed, the door position is slightly open. An additional pressure differential of one pound per square foot is then sufficient to fully open the doors. The nominal door opening characteristics are based on test results.
| |
| One analysis conservatively assumed that flow through the postulated leakage paths is pure steam. During the actual blowdown transient, steam and air representative of the lower compartment mixture leak through the holes, thus less steam would enter the upper compartment. If flow were considered to be a mixture of liquid and vapor, the total leakage mass would increase, but the steam flow rate would decrease. The analysis also assumed that no condensing of the flow occurs due to structural heat sinks. The peak air compression in the upper compartment for the various break sizes is assumed with steam mass added to this value to obtain the total containment pressure. Air compression for the various break sizes is obtained from previous full-scale section tests conducted at Waltz Mill.
| |
| The allowable leakage area for the following reactor coolant system (RCS) break sizes was determined: DE, 0.6 DE, 3 ft2, 10 inch diameter, 6 inch diameter, 2.5 inch diameter, and 0.5 inch diameter. The allowable deck leakage area for the DE break was based on the test results previously discussed. For break sizes of 3 ft2 and 0.6 DE, a series of deck leakage sensitivity studies were made to establish the total steam leakage to the upper compartment over the blowdown transient. This steam was added to the peak compression air mass in the upper compartment to calculate a peak pressure. Air and steam were assumed to be in thermal equilibrium, with the air partial pressure increased over the air compression value to account for heating effects. For these breaks, sprays were neglected. Reduction in compression ratio by return of air to the lower compartment was conservatively neglected. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 6.2.1-14. This analysis is confirmed by Waltz Mill tests conducted with various deck leaks equivalent to over 50 ft2 feet of deck leakage for the double-ended blowdown rate and is shown in Figure 6.2.1-20.
| |
| For breaks of 10 inch diameter and smaller, the effect of containment sprays was included. The method used calculates, for each time step of the blowdown, the amount of steam leaking into the upper compartment to obtain the steam mass in the upper compartment. This steam was mixed with the air in the upper compartment, assuming thermal equilibrium with air. The air partial pressure was increased to account for air heating effects. After sprays were initiated, the pressure was calculated based on the rate of accumulation of steam in the upper compartment.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-19
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 This analysis was conducted for the 10 inch, 6 inch, and 2 inch break sizes, assuming one spray pump operated (4750 gpm at 100°F). As shown in Table 6.2.1-14, the 10 inch break is the limiting case for this range of break sizes.
| |
| A second, more realistic, method was used to analyze the 10 inch, 6 inch, and 2 inch breaks. This analysis assumed a 30% air and 70% steam mix flowing through the deck leakage area. This is conservative considering the amount of air in the lower compartment during this portion of the transient. Operation of the deck fan increases the air content of the lower compartment, thus increasing the allowable deck leakage area. Based on the LOTIC code analysis, a structural heat removal rate of over 6000 Btu/sec from the upper compartment is indicated. Therefore, a steam condensation rate of 6 lbs/sec was used for the upper compartment. The results indicate that with one spray pump operating and a deck leakage area of 50 ft2, the peak containment pressure is below design pressure.
| |
| The 1/2 inch diameter break is not sufficient to open the ice condenser inlet doors. For this break, the upper compartment spray is sufficient to condense the break steam flow.
| |
| In conclusion, it is apparent that there is a substantial margin between the design deck leakage area of 5 ft2 and that which can be tolerated without exceeding containment design pressure. A preoperational visual inspection has been performed to ensure that the seals between the upper and lower containment have been properly installed.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.6 Mass and Energy Release Data Long-Term Mass and Energy Releases Following a postulated rupture of the reactor coolant system (RCS), steam and water is released into the containment system. Initially the water in the RCS is sub-cooled at a high pressure. When the break occurs, the water passes through the break where a portion flashes to steam at the lower pressure of the containment. These releases continue until the RCS depressurizes to the pressure in the containment (end of blowdown). At that time, the vessel is refilled by water from the accumulators and safety injection (SI) pumps. The analysis assumes that the lower plenum is filled with saturated water at the end of blowdown, to maximize steam releases to the containment. Therefore, the water flowing from the accumulators and SI pumps starts to fill the downcomer causing a driving head across the vessel which forces water into the hot core.
| |
| During the reflood phase of the accident water enters the core where a portion is converted to steam which entrains an amount of water into the hot legs at a high velocity. Water continues to enter the core and release the stored energy of the fuel and clad as the mixture height in the core increases. When the level, two feet below the top of the core, is reached the core is assumed to be totally quenched which leaves only decay heat to generate steam. This type of break is analyzed at three locations.
| |
| The location of the break can significantly change the reflood transient. It is for this reason that the (1) hot leg, (2) pump suction, and (3) cold leg break locations are 6.2-20 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 analyzed. For a cold leg break, all of the fluid which leaves the core must vent through a steam generator and becomes superheated. However, relative to breaks at other locations, the core flooding rate (and therefore the rate of fluid leaving the core) is low because all the core vent paths include the resistance of the reactor coolant pump. For a hot leg pipe break the vent path resistance is relatively low, which results in a high core flooding rate, but the majority of the fluid which exits the core bypasses the steam generators in venting to the containment. The pump suction break combines the effects of the relatively high core flooding rate, as it in the hot leg break, and steam generator heat addition as in the cold leg break. As a result, the pump suction breaks yield the highest energy flow rates during the post blowdown period. The spectrum of breaks analyzed includes the largest cold and hot leg breaks, reactor inlet and outlet respectively, and a range of pump suction breaks from the largest to 3.0 ft2. Because of the phenomena of reflood as discussed above, the pump suction break location is the worst case. This conclusion is supported by studies of smaller hot leg breaks which have been shown, on similar plants, to be less severe than the double ended hot leg.
| |
| Cold leg breaks, however, are lower both in the blowdown peak and in the reflood pressure rise. Thus an analysis of smaller pump suction breaks is representative of the spectrum of break sizes.
| |
| The LOCA analysis calculational model is typically divided into three phases which are:
| |
| : 1) blowdown, which includes the period from accident occurrence (when the reactor is at steady state full power operation) to the time when zero break flow is first calculated,
| |
| : 2) refill, which is from the end of blowdown to the time the ECCS fills the vessel lower plenum, and 3) reflood, which begins when water starts moving into the core and continues until the end of the transient. For the pump suction break, consideration is given to a possible fourth phase; that is, froth boiling in the steam generator tubes after the core has been quenched. For a description of the calculational model used for the mass and energy release analysis[9]. As per this model the flowsplit is assumed to be 100% at 1765 seconds for maximum safeguards and 1637 seconds for minimum safeguards.
| |
| Basis of the Analysis (1) Assumptions The following items ensure that the core energy release is conservatively analyzed for maximum containment pressure.
| |
| (a) Maximum expected operating temperature (618.2°F)
| |
| (b) Allowance in temperature for instrument error and dead band (+4°F)
| |
| (c) Margin in volume (1.4%)
| |
| (d) Allowance in volume for thermal expansion (1.6%)
| |
| (e) Margin in core power associated with use of engineered safeguards design rating (ESDR)
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-21
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (f) Allowance for calorimetric error (2% of ESDR)
| |
| (g) Conservatively modified coefficients of heat transfer (h) Allowance in core stored energy for effect of fuel densification (i) Margin in core stored energy (+20%).
| |
| (2) Initial Conditions Core Power (License Application) (MWt) 3411 Engineered Safeguards Design Rating (ESDR) (MWt) 3579 Vessel/Core Inlet Temperature (Tc) (plus 2% allowance 558.1 for calorimetric error) (F)
| |
| Vessel Average Temperature (Tavg) (F) 588.2 Vessel Outlet Temperature (Th) (F) 618.2 Steam Pressure (psia) 1000 Rod Array 17xl7 Total Accumulator Mass (1bm) 210,300 Accumulator Temperature (F) 120 Accumulator Pressure (psia) 600 Assumed Containment Reference Pressure (psia) 26.7 Pumped Injection (assumed)
| |
| Minimum (ft3/sec) 10.8 Maximum (ft3/sec) 22.4 Recirculation Time (assumed) (sec) 1455 Long-Term Mass and Energy Release Data Blowdown Results Table 6.2.1-15 lists the calculated mass and energy releases for the blowdown phase of the various breaks analyzed, with the corresponding break size.
| |
| Reflood Results Table 6.2.1-17 presents the hydraulic parameters used for the reflood analysis.
| |
| Figures 6.2.1-21 through 6.2.1-25 present the core inlet temperature, the core flooding rate, the carry over fraction, the fraction of flow through the broken loop, and the core and downcomer water levels, respectively, for the double-ended pump suction guillotine with minimum safeguards safety injection. Table 6.2.1-18 lists the table numbers for the calculated mass and energy releases for the reflood chase of the 6.2-22 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 various breaks analyzed along with the corresponding safeguards assumption (maximum or minimum).
| |
| Two-Phase Post-Reflood Results Two froth analyses were performed: a double-ended pump suction (DEPS) guillotine break with maximum safeguards SI flow, and a DEPS break with minimum safeguards SI flow. For both cases the release rates are based on a reference temperature for heat stored in the steam generator secondary fluid equal to saturation temperature corresponding to reference pressure of 20.2 psia. The table below presents a summary of the available secondary side energy for the broken loop and intact loop for both cases.
| |
| The heat content of the broken and unbroken steam, generators as a function of time is shown in Figure 6.2.1-26 for the DEPS guillotine break minimum safeguards case.
| |
| Case 1 Case 2 Break DEPS DEPS SI Assumption Maximum Minimum Available Energy of Secondary Mass for Broken Loop Steam 14.9* 16.3*
| |
| Generator (106 Btu)
| |
| Available Energy of Secondary Mass for Intact Loop Steam 179.0* 179.7*
| |
| Generators (106 Btu)
| |
| Total Available Steam Generator 193.9* 196.0*
| |
| Energy
| |
| * Referenced to 228.0°F.
| |
| Tables 6.2.1-20 and 6.2.1-21 present the calculated mass and energy release rate data for a DEPS break using maximum and minimum safeguards assumptions, respectively. These tables completely replace the mass and energy release data after the end of 10-foot entrainment occurs (see Tables 6.2.1-19a and 6.2.1-19b).
| |
| Depressurization Energy Release The froth mass and energy release data presented in Tables 6.2.1-20 and 6.2.1-21 are based on a reference temperature for heat stored in the steam generator metal and secondary fluid of saturation at assumed containment back pressure (20.2 psia) up to the time at which the broken loop steam generator equilibrates.
| |
| Since the containment pressure remains above this value until after the time of peak pressure, depressurization energy release need not be calculated until peak pressure has occurred and the pressure returns to 20.2 psia. At this point the energy remaining CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-23
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 in the system, presented in Table 6.2.1-22, can be added to the decay heat release by using the equation below:
| |
| q total
| |
| * T t q* = ------------------------------------
| |
| T total q= heat release rate (Btu/sec) qtotal= total available heat from Table 6.2.1-22 (Btu)
| |
| T/t= rate of temperature change (°F/sec)
| |
| Ttotal= initial temperature differential (16°F)
| |
| Short-Term Mass and Energy Releases The short-term mass and energy release models and assumptions are described in Reference [9]. The LOCA short-term mass and energy release data used to perform the containment analysis given in Sections 6.2.1.3.4 and 6.2.1.3.9 are listed below:
| |
| Section Break Size and Location Table 6.2.1.3.4 Double-Ended Cold Leg 6.2.1-23 Guillotine Break Outside the Biological Shield 6.2.1.3.4 Double-Ended Hot Leg 6.2.1-24 Guillotine Break Outside the Biological Shield 6.2.1.3.9 Double-Ended Pressurizer 6.2.1-28 Spray Line Break 6.2.1.3.9 127 in2 Cold Leg Break at the 6.2.1-30 Reactor Vessel 6.2.1.3.7 Accident Chronology For a double-ended pump suction loss-of-coolant accident, the major events and their time of occurrence are shown in Table 6.2.1-25 for the minimum safeguards case.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.8 Energy Balance Tables Tables 6.2.1-26a through 6.2.1-26f give the initial energy distribution as well as the energy distribution at end of blowdown and end of reflood for various break locations and sizes. The release rate transients for this case are consistent with the 10 foot entrainment calculation.
| |
| 6.2-24 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2.1.3.9 Containment Pressure Differentials Consideration is given in the design of the containment internal structures to localized pressure pulses that could occur following a loss-of-coolant accident. If a loss-of-coolant accident were to occur due to a pipe rupture in these relatively small volumes, the pressure would build up at a rate faster than the overall containment, thus imposing a differential pressure across the walls of the structures.
| |
| These subcompartments include the steam generator enclosure, pressurizer enclosure, and upper and lower reactor cavity. Each compartment is designed for the largest blowdown flow resulting from the severance of the largest connecting pipe within the enclosure or the blowdown flow into the enclosure from a break in an adjacent region.
| |
| The following paragraphs summarize the design basis calculations:
| |
| Steam Generator Enclosure The worst break possible in the steam generator enclosure is a double-ended rupture of the steamline pipe at no load conditions. Based on an investigation of postulated break locations, the rupture is assumed to occur at the point where the steamline exits the steam generator. The blowdown for this break is given in Table 6.2.1-27a. The TMD computer code using the compressibility factor and assuming unaugmented critical flow is used to calculate the short-term pressure transients. The nodalization of the steam generator enclosure where the break occurs is shown in Figure 6.2.1-81.
| |
| Node 51 is the break element and has a flow path to the adjacent steam generator enclosure which is a mirror image of the enclosure where the break occurs. Both enclosures are nodalized in the same manner; their nodal network is shown in Figure 6.2.1-82 and their input data is given in Tables 6.2.1-27b and 6.2.1-27c. This input data assumes that the insulation remains intact. The loss coefficients were computed using Reference [12]. The maximum number of nodes used is based on the geometry of the system. The steam generator compartment is essentially symmetrical with no major obstructions to flow which would introduce asymmetric pressures. In addition, the flow path to the adjacent steam generator is at the top of the enclosure. Therefore, a significant differential pressure will not occur across the steam generator vessel. The balance of plant data is similar to that presented in Section 6.2.1.3.4.
| |
| The peak pressure differentials across the steam generator enclosure, the steam generator vessel, and the steam generator separator wall are given in Table 6.2.1-27d.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-83 shows the differential pressure transient between the break element and the upper compartment (Node 25). Figures 6.2.1-84 and 6.2.1-85 illustrate the differential pressure transient across the steam generator vessel. As Figures 6.2.1-84 and 6.2.1-85 show, the pressure differentials across the vessel are low and are due solely to inertial effects. These are overpredicted in our analysis since changes in break flowrates are assumed to be instantaneous. The pressure vs time curve for the break element is given in Figure 6.2.1-86 and for the upper compartment (Node 25) in Figure 6.2.1-86a.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-25
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Pressurizer Enclosure The worst break possible in the pressurizer enclosure is a double-ended rupture of the six-inch spray line. The rupture is assumed to occur at the top of the enclosure. The blowdown for this break is given in Table 6.2.1-28. The TMD computer code using the compressibility factor and assuming unaugmented critical flow is used to calculate the short-term pressure transient. The nodalization of the enclosure is shown in Figure 6.2.1-87. Node 51 is the break element. The input data is given in Table 6.2.1-29.
| |
| This input data assumes that the insulation remains intact. The loss coefficients were computed using Reference [12]. The maximum number of nodes used was based on the geometry of the system. The pressurizer compartment is essentially symmetrical with no major obstructions to flow which would introduce asymmetric pressures on the pressurizer vessel. The balance of plant data is similar to that presented in Section 6.2.1.3.4.
| |
| The peak pressure differentials across the pressurizer enclosure's walls, and across the pressurizer vessel are given in Table 6.2.1-29a. Figure 6.2.1-88 shows the pressure transient between the break element and the upper compartment (Node 25).
| |
| As Figures 6.2.1-89 through 6.2.1-91 show, the significant pressure differential across the vessel are low, occur early, and are due solely to inertial effects. The pressure vs.
| |
| time curve for the break element is given in Figure 6.2.1-92.
| |
| Reactor Cavity The TMD computer code with the unaugmented homogeneous critical flow correlation and the isentropic compressible subsonic flow correlation was used to calculate pressure transients in the reactor cavity region.
| |
| Nodalization sensitivity studies were performed before the analysis was begun. The total number of nodes used varied from 6 to 68. In the 6-element model, no detail of the reactor vessel annulus was involved, and for that reason the model was discarded.
| |
| Subsequent model changes primarily involved greater detail in the reactor vessel annulus. First, the annulus was divided into two vertical and eight circumferential regions. Next, some additional detail was added to the region of the broken nozzle.
| |
| The next changes were effected by increasing the model to three vertical and eight circumferential regions. The total integrated pressure in the reactor cavity changed only slightly because of the last change. The next change, to 68 elements, produced the model shown with detailed modeling around the nozzle sustaining the break. The additional elements from 48 to 52 are external to the reactor cavity (ice condenser).
| |
| Additional elements were added to account for all real area changes in the immediate vicinity of the break (i.e., Elements 53 and 54 were added to model the broken loop pipe annulus and the broken loop inspection port, respectively).
| |
| The nodal scheme around the reactor vessel produces a very accurate post accident pressure profile because of its design. Element 3 is a small element inside the primary shield. It would contain internal flow losses due to turning and thus contain a pressure gradient if it were made larger. The four elements numbered 33, 34, 45, and 46 are made small to minimize internal pressure variation, and the elements farther from the break are made larger because pressure gradients are low in those regions.
| |
| 6.2-26 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-27 illustrates the positions of some of the compartments. Figure 6.2.1-28 shows the flow path connections for the 68 element model. Figure 6.2.1-29 illustrates the general configuration of the reactor vessel annulus nodalization. In the model, the lower containment is divided into four loop compartments (21 to 24). The upper containment is represented by Compartment 32. The ice condenser is modeled as five elements (48 to 52), neglecting any flow distribution effects. The break simultaneously occurs in Elements 1 and 25, immediately surrounding the nozzle. The corresponding broken loop pipe annulus is represented by Element 53. The lower reactor cavity is modeled by Element 2, the upper reactor cavity by Element 47, and the remainder of the elements, as shown in Figure 6.2.1-29, model the reactor vessel annulus.
| |
| Compartments 15, 42, and 16 are really adjoining Compartments 17, 43, and 18, respectively, and Compartment 13 is on the opposite side of the vessel from the assumed break. Element 54 represents the inspection port volume above the break.
| |
| A break limiting restraint restricts the break size. A 127 in2 cold leg break is the limiting case break for the reactor cavity analysis. The mass and energy release rates are presented in Table 6.2.1-30. Tables 6.2.1-31 and 6.2.1-32 provide the volumes, flow paths, lengths, diameters, flow areas, resistance factors, and area ratios for the elements and their connections.
| |
| The inspection port plugs were assumed to be removed at the start of the accident. All insulation is assumed in place and uncrushed during the entire transient except for the insulation between the break and the reactor vessel annulus. This insulation was conservatively assumed to crush to zero thickness.
| |
| The loss of coefficient (k) values were determined by changes in flow area and by turns the flow makes in traveling from the centroid of the upstream node to the centroid of the downstream node. The k and f factors for each path were determined using methods from such references as "Flow of Fluids through Valves, Fittings, and Pipes" by the crane company and "Chemical Engineering" by J. M. Coulson and J. A.
| |
| Richardson.
| |
| Figures 6.2.1-30 through 6.2.1-68 show representative pressure transients for the break compartments, the upper and lower reactor cavities, the inspection port volume and pipe annulus near the break, the upper containment and the reactor vessel annulus. These plots demonstrate that the pressure gradient is steep near the break location and is very gradual farther away from the break. This indicates that the model must be very detailed close to the break location, but less detail is required with increasing distance.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.10 Steam Line Break Inside Containment Pipe Break Blowdowns - Spectra and Assumptions A series of steam line breaks were analyzed to determine the most severe break condition for containment temperature and pressure response. The following assumptions were used in these analysis:
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-27
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 (1) The following break types were evaluated:
| |
| (a) Double-ended 4.6 ft2 ruptures occurring at the nozzle on one steam generator. Steam line flow restrictions in the stream generators limit the effective break area of a full double-ended pipe rupture to a maximum of 1.4 ft2 per steam generator.
| |
| (b) The largest split break which will not generate the low steamline pressure signal for steamline isolation.
| |
| (c) Small split breaks of 0.6, 0.35, and 0.1 ft2.
| |
| (2) Steam line isolation signals and feedwater line isolation signals are generated by either a low steam line pressure signal, high-high containment pressure signal, or high steam line pressure rate signal. An allowance of 8 seconds is implicitly assumed for steam line isolation including generation, processing, and delay of the isolation signal and valve closure. An allowance of 8 seconds is implicitly assumed for feedwater line isolation including generation, processing, and delay of the isolation signal and valve closure.
| |
| (3) Failure of a diesel generator is assumed in all cases. This results in the loss of one containment safeguards train resulting in minimum heat removal capability.
| |
| (4) Blowdown from the broken steam line is assumed to be dry saturated steam.
| |
| (5) Plant power levels of 102% and zero of nominal full-load power for DER, and split pipe ruptures at 30% of nominal full-load power.
| |
| (6) Failure of a feedwater isolation valve (FIV) or control valve (FCV), failure of auxiliary feedwater runout control protection, and failure of a safety injection train are considered.
| |
| (7) Four cases for each double-ended rupture and power level scenario are evaluated. One case each models the feedwater isolation valve failure, feedwater control valve failure, and auxiliary feedwater runout control protection failure, individually. The fourth case assumes no single failure in the plant steam system.
| |
| (8) The auxiliary feedwater system is manually realigned by the operator after 10 minutes to terminate AFW to the faulted steam generator.
| |
| (9) For the full double-ended ruptures, the main feedwater flow to the steam generator with the broken steam line was calculated based on an initial flow of 100% of nominal full power flow and a conservatively rapid steam generator depressurization. The peak value of this flow occurring just prior to isolation is 326% of nominal.
| |
| 6.2-28 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 (10) An allowance is added to the mass and energy released from the break to account for steam from the main steam lines which could flow out of the break if the main steam isolation valve in the steam line with the break fails to close.
| |
| Break Flow Calculations (1) Steam Generator Blowdown Break flows and enthalpies from the steam generators are calculated using the Westinghouse LOFTRAN code[14]. Blowdown mass and energy release are determined using the LOFTRAN code which includes effects of core power generation, main and auxiliary feedwater additions, engineered safeguards systems, reactor coolant system thick metal heat storage, and reverse steam generator heat transfer.
| |
| (2) Steam Plant Piping Blowdown The contribution to the mass and energy releases from the secondary plant steam piping is included in the mass and energy release rates presented in Table 6.2.1-39. For all ruptures, the steam piping volume blowdown begins at the time of the break and continues at a uniform rate until the entire piping inventory is released. The flowrate is determined using the Moody correlation, the pipe cross-sectional area, and the initial steam pressure.
| |
| Following the piping blowdown, reverse flow from the intact steam generators continues to simulate the reverse steam generator flow until steam line isolation.
| |
| Single Failure Effects (1) Failure of a feedwater isolation valve could only result in additional inventory in the feedwater line which would not be isolated from the steam generator.
| |
| The mass in this volume can flush into the steam generator and exit through the break. The feedwater regulating valve closes in no more than 6.5 seconds precluding any additional feedwater from being pumped into the steam generator. The additional line volume available to flush into the steam generator is that between the feedwater isolation valve and the feedwater regulating valve, including all headers and connecting lines.
| |
| (2) Failure of a feedwater regulating valve to operate properly can result in an increased feedwater flow into the steam generator and exit through the break.
| |
| Feedwater isolation valve closure limits the feedwater addition to the steam generator.
| |
| (3) Failure of the auxiliary feedwater runout control equipment would result in higher auxiliary feedwater flows entering the steam generator prior to realignment of the auxiliary feed system. For cases where the runout control operates properly, a constant auxiliary feed flow of approximately 1,500 gpm CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-29
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 was assumed. This value was increased to approximately 2,250 gpm for the 100% and 0% power cases and 2040 gpm for the 30% power cases to simulate a failure of the runout control.
| |
| (4) Failure of a safety injection train results in less SI flow and will result in a greater return to power. For consistency, the steam line break core response analysis, in all cases, conservatively assumes failure of a safety injection train.
| |
| (5) Failure to the main steam isolation valve (located outside of containment) in the steam line with the break allows steam from all four main steam lines (downstream of the other main steam isolation valves which close) to flow out the break. The analysis accounts for this effect by including an allowance for additional mass and energy released through the break due to the volume of steam contained in the main steam lines. No additional steam is released through the break if the postulated single failure is a main steam isolation valve in another steam line not closing. In this case, the main steam isolation valve in the broken steam line does close and there is no backflow from the downstream piping to the break.
| |
| Worst-Case Mass and Energy Releases The following steam line break cases were determined to represent the worst case steamline break results:
| |
| (1) Full double-ended rupture at 102% of nominal full power with a failure of the runout control system. This represents the limiting DER case in terms of calculated peak temperature.
| |
| (2) A 0.6 ft2 split break at 30% of nominal full power with a failure of the runout control system. This represents the limiting SB case in terms of calculated peak temperature.
| |
| (3) A 0.35 ft2 split break at 30% at nominal full power with a failure of the runout control system. This represents the limiting case SB case in terms of superheat temperature duration.
| |
| Mass and energy releases for these cases are listed in Table 6.2.1-39.
| |
| Maximum Containment Temperature Analysis for Steam Line Break Following a steam line break in the lower compartment of an ice condenser plant, two distinct analyses must be performed. The first analysis, a short-term pressure analysis, has been performed with the TMD computer code (see Section 6.2.1.3.9).
| |
| The second analysis, a long-term analysis, does not require the large number of nodes which the TMD analysis requires. The computer code which performs this analysis is the LOTIC computer code.
| |
| The LOTIC-3 computer code was developed to analyze steamline breaks in an ice condenser plant. Details of the LOTIC-3 computer code are given in References [1],
| |
| 6.2-30 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85
| |
| [2], and [3]. It now includes the capability to calculate superheat conditions, and has the ability to begin calculations from time zero[17]. The LOTIC-3 computer code has been found to be acceptable for the analysis of steam line breaks[16],[18] with the following restrictions:
| |
| (1) Mass and energy release rates are calculated with an approved model.
| |
| (2) Complete break spectrums are analyzed.
| |
| (3) Convective heat flux calculations, as described in Reference [2], are performed for all break sizes.
| |
| Two separate condensation models are used by the LOTIC-3 computer. The 100%
| |
| condensate reevaporization model is used for large breaks. For small breaks, the conservative 0% condensate reevaporization and convective heat flux models are used. As pointed out in previous LOTIC-3 submittals[16],[17],[18], this position is felt to be justified. However, it has also been shown that the small steam line break temperature transients are more severe than large break transients, even if the large break calculations assume no reevaporization of the condensate heat flux[3].
| |
| Containment Transient Calculations The following are the major input assumptions used in the LOTIC-3 steam line break analysis for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant:
| |
| (1) Minimum safeguards are employed, e.g., one of two spray pumps, and one of two air return fans.
| |
| (2) A quantity of 2.125x106 lbs of ice is assumed for the DER cases, and 2.025x106 lbs of ice is conservatively assumed for the small split cases, to be initially in the ice condenser.
| |
| (3) The boron injection tank remains installed without heat tracing, and the boric acid concentration is reduced to zero ppm (Table 6.2.1-40).
| |
| (4) The air return fan is effective 10 minutes after the transient is initiated. Actual air return fan initiation can take place in 9+1 minutes. Initiation as early as 8 minutes does not adversely affect the outcome of the analysis.
| |
| (5) A uniform distribution of steam flow into the ice bed is assumed.
| |
| (6) The initial conditions in the containment are a temperature of 120°F in the lower compartment, 120°F in the dead-ended compartment, a temperature of 85°F in the upper compartment, and a temperature of 15°F in the ice condenser. All volumes are at a pressure of 0.3 psig (see Table 6.2.1-13).
| |
| (7) A containment spray pump flow of 4,030 gpm is conservatively used in the upper compartment. A diesel loading sequence for the containment sprays to energize and come up to full flow and head in 135 seconds was used in the analysis. As discussed in the Section 6.2.1.3.2 list of assumptions, CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-31
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 subsequent analysis has changed the loading sequence to 221 seconds.
| |
| However, this does not significantly affect the results obtained with the 135 second delay time utilized. It is also noted that the calculated CSS flow rate is 4,650 gpm, which bounds the 4,030 gpm flow rate used in the analysis and, being conservative, offsets any effect due to the loading sequence delay change.
| |
| (8) Containment structural heat sinks as presented in Table 6.2.1-1 were used.
| |
| The material properties are given in Table 6.2.1-5.
| |
| (9) The air return fan empties air at a rate of 40,000 ft3/min from the upper to the lower compartments. The total calculated air flow rate discharged to the dead-end compartment used is 41,885 cfm and is, therefore, bounded.
| |
| (10) A series of large break cases (1.4 - 4.6 ft2 double-ended ruptures) were run to determine the limiting large break case (Table 6.2.1-41). In addition, a series of small breaks were analyzed with LOTIC at the 30% power level (Table 6.2.1-42).
| |
| (11) The mass and energy releases for the limiting breaks are given in Table 6.2.1-39. Since these rates are considerably less than the RCS double-ended breaks and their total integrated energy is not sufficient to cause icebed meltout, the containment pressure transients generated for the RCS breaks will be more severe. However, since the steam line break blowdowns are superheated, the lower compartment temperature transients calculated in this analysis will be limited. These temperature transients are given in Figures 6.2.1-69 through 6.2.1-74.
| |
| (12) The heat transfer coefficients to the containment structures are based on the work of Tagami. An explanation of their manner of application is given in Reference [3]. The stagnant heat transfer coefficients were limited to 72 Btu/hr-ft2. This corresponds to a steam-air ratio of 1.4 (according to the Tagami correlation). The imposition of this limitation is to restrict the use of the Tagami correlation within the range of steam-air ratios from which the correlation was derived.
| |
| The containment responses presented identifies the limiting and most severe cases for the large double-ended ruptures and small split breaks.
| |
| Large Break The limiting case among the double-ended ruptures, which yielded a calculated peak temperature of 290.5°F and a peak pressure of 9.4 psig, is the 1.4 ft2 loop break at 102% of nominal full power with a failure in a main feedwater control valve. Figure 6.2.1-69 provides the upper and lower compartment temperature transients, and Figure 6.2.1-70 illustrates the lower compartment pressure transients. Table 6.2.1-39 contains the mass and energy release rates for the above case.
| |
| 6.2-32 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Small Break The most severe transient in terms of superheat temperature duration for the small break spectrum is the .35 ft2, 30% nominal full power, with AFW pump runout protection failure. The temperature transient with a peak temperature of 324.86°F and peak pressure of 6.33 psig for the case is presented in Figure 6.2.1-71, and the pressure transient is provided in Figure 6.2.1-72. Table 6.2.1-39 provides the mass and energy release rates for this case.
| |
| The most limiting case in terms of peak calculated temperature is the 0.6 ft2, 30%
| |
| power, with AFW pump runout protection failure case. This case resulted in a calculated peak temperature of 325.4°F and peak pressure of 6.97 psig. Figure 6.2.1-73 presents the temperature transient, and Figure 6.2.1-74 shows the pressure transient of the lower compartment. The mass and energy releases are provided in Table 6.2.1-39.
| |
| Tables 6.2.1-43 and 6.2.1-44 provide the overall results of the calculated peak temperatures for the large and small break spectrums, respectively.
| |
| 6.2.1.3.11 Maximum Reverse Pressure Differentials Following a postulated pipe break accident, the occurrence inside the ice condenser containment may be characterized by two distinct periods:
| |
| (1) The initial blowdown, which occurs in approximately 10 seconds. During this period, the air initially in the lower compartment is swept into the upper compartment and the dead-ended compartment by the blowdown mass.
| |
| Large mass and pressure gradients occur throughout the containment.
| |
| (2) The depressurization and post-blowdown period which occurs after the end of the initial blowdown. During this period the pressure gradient within the four compartments (upper, lower, ice condenser, and dead-ended) is almost nonexistent. The shape of the pressure transient resembles that of the mass and energy releases. Pressure decreases as blowdown diminishes, followed by a slow increase sometime during the reflood.
| |
| The analysis for the first period will usually require the modeling of the containment into many nodes so that the non-uniformity of pressure and mass distribution may be properly represented. This has been done in the TMD code.
| |
| On the other hand, the analysis for the second period will only require the modeling of the containment by a four-compartment system. These calculations are performed by the LOTIC code[1].
| |
| The code options and features discussed are used in calculating ECCS back-pressure and reverse pressure differentials across the operating deck.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-33
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Basic Assumptions (1) The containment is assumed to be physically divided into four compartments:
| |
| upper, lower, ice condenser, and dead-ended compartments. Each compartment is a control volume of uniform temperature, pressure and mass distribution. Steam is also assumed to be saturated in each control volume.
| |
| (2) Flow between compartments is related to the pressure differential between the compartments by a flow resistance factor.
| |
| (3) A two-sump model is assumed. Temperature is considered to be uniform in each sump.
| |
| Conservation Equations For each control volume or compartment, the conservation equations of mass, energy, momentum, and volume, an ideal gas law for air, and the equation of state for saturated steam may be written:
| |
| (1) Energy equation:
| |
| d V as + V c d ( P s + P a )
| |
| - ------------------------------ + ( mh ) out - ( mh ) = R e
| |
| ----- (M a h a + M s h s + M c h c) - ---------------------
| |
| dt J dt For the lower compartment:
| |
| Re = [Rate of energy out of break]
| |
| + [Rate of flow energy from accumulator in the form of steam, water, and nitrogen]
| |
| - [Rate of structural heat removal]
| |
| - [Rate of flow energy of sprays if applicable]
| |
| - [Rate of heat transfer to the sump]
| |
| - [Rate of heat removal by the ice condenser drain flow, if acting as a spray]
| |
| - [Rate of energy associated with the loss on condensate from atmosphere falling to floor]
| |
| + [Net rate of flow energy from the dead-ended compartment]
| |
| For the upper compartment:
| |
| Re = [Flow energy of the entering spray]
| |
| - [Structure heat removal rate]
| |
| - [Energy rate associated with condensate falling from atmosphere]
| |
| For the ice condenser:
| |
| 6.2-34 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Re =[Structure heat removal rate]
| |
| - [Rate of heat transfer to the ice]
| |
| - [Energy rate associated with ice melt and steam condensate falling from atmosphere]
| |
| (2) Conservation of steam and water masses:
| |
| dM s dM c
| |
| ----------- + ----------- + ( M s ) - ( M s ) in = R s dt dt out For the lower compartment:
| |
| Rs = [Rate of flow out of the RCS]
| |
| + [Rate of flow out of the accumulator in the form of steam and water]
| |
| + [Flow rate of the entering spray if applicable]
| |
| - [Rate of condensate falling to the floor]
| |
| + [Rate of steam flow from the dead-ended compartment]
| |
| For the upper compartment:
| |
| Rs = [Flow rate of the entering spray]
| |
| - [Rate of condensate falling to the floor]
| |
| For the ice condenser:
| |
| Rs = - [Rate of condensate falling to the floor]
| |
| (3) Conservation of air mass:
| |
| dM a
| |
| ----------- + ( M a ) - ( M a ) in = R a dt out For the lower compartment:
| |
| Ra = [Rate of nitrogen flow out of the accumulator]
| |
| + [Rate of air flow out of the dead-ended compartment]
| |
| For the upper compartment and the ice condenser:
| |
| Ra = 0 (4) Conservation of momentum:
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-35
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 2
| |
| 1 K M ij P i - P j = --- -----ij- ---------
| |
| 2 A 2 g c
| |
| (5) Volume conservation:
| |
| dV as dV c
| |
| ------------- + ---------- = R v dt dt For the lower compartment:
| |
| Rv = [Rate of increase in sump water volume]
| |
| For the upper compartment:
| |
| Rv = 0 For the ice condenser:
| |
| Rv = [Rate of increase in free volume due to ice melting]
| |
| (6) Ideal gas law for air:
| |
| PaVas = MaRaT (7) Equations of state for saturated steam:
| |
| Ps = f1(T), hs = f2(T), vs = f3(T)
| |
| For the dead-ended compartment, the structure heat removal is assumed to be negligible, and the conservation equations of energy and mass simplified to:
| |
| d v d ( Ps + Pa )
| |
| ----- ( M a h a + M s h s ) - --- ---------------------------
| |
| - = [ Rate of energy flow from the lower compartment ]
| |
| dt J dt
| |
| ( dM a )
| |
| - = [Rate of air flow from the lower compartment]
| |
| ( dt )
| |
| ( dM s )
| |
| ---------------- = [Rate of steam flow from the lower compartment]
| |
| ( dt )
| |
| 6.2-36 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Method of Solution The preceding equations were linearized and programmed for simultaneous solutions using the standard Gauss-Jordan reduction method. For each time step, the solutions are the rates of increase of mass and pressure for each constituent in each compartment, and the flow rates between the compartments. These rates are used to control the time step so that total change of the compartment conditions in each time step can be controlled. This assures more accurate and stable solutions.
| |
| Structure Heat Transfer The standard Westinghouse ECCS containment structural heat transfer model is applied to this code. This model assumes one dimensional conduction heat transfer in the structure and uses film heat transfer coefficient based primarily on the work of Tagami. The Tagami correlation for the film heat transfer may be written as:
| |
| E 0.6 H max = 75 -------- (1) tp V t
| |
| H = H max = ----- for 0 t t p (2) tp
| |
| - 0.5 [ t - t p ]
| |
| H = H stag + [ H max - H stag ]e for t p t (3) where:
| |
| H stag = 2 + 50 X (4)
| |
| For this application, we have found it is useful to relate the "coolant energy transfer",
| |
| (E/tpV), to containment conditions. This may be done by writing:
| |
| E Ms hs + Mf hf 1 Mf
| |
| -------- = -------------------------------
| |
| - = ---------- h s + ------- - h f (5) tp V tp V tp vs Ms where:
| |
| h s, h f and s are respectively the enthalpies of saturated steam and water, and the specific volume of steam, at tp, the time when the peak containment pressure is reached.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-37
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Equations (1) through (5) are used for the lower compartment structure calculations.
| |
| For the upper compartment, only the stagnant heat transfer correlation of Equation (4) is used because of little steam penetration into the upper compartment even during the initial blowdown period.
| |
| Ice Condenser Heat Transfer The transfer of heat from steam to ice which results in the simultaneous occurrence of steam condensation and ice melting is a complex mechanism.
| |
| During the initial blowdown period when high temperature blowdown steam and water hits the bottom of ice columns, and then flows over the ice surface, turbulent condensation results. During this period the heat transfer rate is strongly dependent on the thickness of the liquid film which separates the high temperature blowdown masses from the ice. This liquid film is composed of steam condensate and ice melt.
| |
| On the macroscopic scale, this is the only heat transfer resistance and the effectiveness of the ice condenser is determined by the rate which this liquid film may be withdrawn. A semi-empirical model for the ice condenser heat transfer during this period is available and has been used successfully in the TMD code. The LOTIC code is not intended to duplicate this effort. Instead mass and energy balances are used to calculate the total ice melting during this period. Following the initial blowdown period, there is a transition period when the blowdown mass and energy rates are decreasing rapidly and the containment atmosphere as a whole is losing internal energy.
| |
| Depressurization and decreasing compartment temperature generally characterize this transition period. As the containment conditions lapse into a much more stable and slowly changing pace after the transition period, the blowdown from the broken pipe is almost drawing to and end. Flow in the ice condenser is now at a rate which is almost negligible compared to that in the initial blowdown period. Temperature in the ice condenser atmosphere has also decreased. Thus, heat transfer is governed by combining natural convection and steam diffusion through an almost stagnant atmosphere. Due to the large air content, the resistance to diffusion is large.
| |
| Therefore, most of the temperature difference between the free-steam steam-air mixture and the ice occurs between the free-steam and the free surface of the liquid film. Temperature difference across the liquid film is now comparatively small. Due to the loss of dominance for the liquid film resistance in the overall heat transfer mechanism, it is not surprising for Yen, Zender, Zavohik, and Tien[11] to conclude that ice melting has very little effect on the overall heat transfer coefficient for condensation-melting heat transfer in the presence of a substantial air concentration. From this, we may therefore treat the ice as if it were simply a cold structure and use Equation (4) to calculate the heat transfer coefficient after the transition period.
| |
| During the transition period, it is plausible to assume that the ice condenser is capable of maintaining its internal energy by condensing any excess energy which flow into the ice condenser.
| |
| 6.2-38 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Special Code Capabilities in Response to Previous NRC Concerns (1) Heat removal from the lower compartment by the ice condenser drain may be accounted for by input of a spray-like efficiency.
| |
| (2) Heat transfer between the lower compartment atmosphere and the sump surface can also be taken into account.
| |
| Drains are provided at the bottom of the ice condenser compartment to allow the melt/condensate water to flow out of the compartment during a loss of coolant accident. In the modified LOTIC code, a calculation of the flow rate at which water leaves these ice condenser drains is included. The solution was reached by using the hydraulic incompressible flow equations commonly found in the literature for both filled pipe flow and fall (weir) flow conditions and at any point in time using the minimum flow rate calculated by the two methods. The filled pipe flow equation employed was a simplified Bernoulli balance:
| |
| 2 V
| |
| Z = ----- + h f + Z 2 2g where:
| |
| Z = Elevation V = Velocity g = Gravitational constant
| |
| = Density 2
| |
| fl- V 2 hf = ----- * ------ g sd 2 Subscripts 1 and 2 represent conditions at the inlet and outlet of the drain, respectively.
| |
| The area of the ice condenser sump was taken to be 3170 ft2, and the height of the door sill to be 8.75 inches. After calculating the velocity from the previous equation, the mass flow rate can be calculated from m* = V 2 A 2 Since a filled pipe flow condition may not exist during the entire post accident transient, a calculation of the draining rate based on the existence of a fall flow phenomena was included. The corresponding equations are outlined below, 2
| |
| Q = --- 2g ( H e3 2 - h 13 2 )
| |
| 3 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-39
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 where:
| |
| Q = Discharge per foot of width (ft3/sec-ft)
| |
| He = Energy of fluid upstream of the fall h1 = Energy of the fluid at the fall edge minus the flowing height D1 = 0.643 Dc h1 = He - D1 By assuming the approach velocity equals zero and through substitution, we arrive at the simplified equation:
| |
| 2 Q = --- 2g [ D c3 2 - ( 0.357 D c) 3 2]
| |
| 3 or Q = 4.2088 D c3 2 where:
| |
| Dc = ft.
| |
| Calculation of Maximum Reverse Pressure Differential The computer model previously described was used to calculate the reverse differential pressure across the operating deck. In order to calculate a maximum reverse differential pressure the following assumptions were made:
| |
| (1) The dead-ended compartment volumes adjacent to the lower compartment (fan and accumulator rooms, pipe trenches, etc.) were assumed to be swept of air during the initial blowdown. This is a very conservative assumption, since this will maximize the air mass forced into the upper ice bed and upper compartment thus raising the compression pressure. In addition, it will minimize the mass of the noncondensables in the lower compartment. With this modeling the dead-ended volume is included with that of the lower compartment (see Figure 6.2.1-75), resulting in a 3-volume simulation of the containment.
| |
| (2) The minimum containment temperatures are assumed in the various subcompartments. This will maximize the air mass forced into the upper containment. It will also increase the heat removal capability of the cold lower compartment structures.
| |
| 6.2-40 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (3) An RWST temperature of 100°F is assumed. This will help raise the upper containment temperature and pressure higher for a longer period of time.
| |
| (4) The upper containment spray flowrates used were runout flows.
| |
| (5) Containment spray to the upper compartment was assumed to start at 25 seconds. An early start time is conservative in that it raises the upper compartment temperature and pressure when the air mass in the upper compartment is at its highest value.
| |
| (6) The containment geometry is the same as that used in the minimum pressure analysis for ECCS purposes. (See Tables 6.2.1-33 through 6.2.1-36.)
| |
| (7) The Westinghouse ECCS model (see WCAP-8339) was used for heat transfer to the structure.
| |
| (8) The mass and energy releases used are based on the analysis presented in WCAP-8479.
| |
| (9) Ice condenser doors are assumed to act as check valves, allowing flow only into the ice condenser.
| |
| (10) The loss coefficient (k/A2) of the deck fins for air flow from the upper to the lower compartment was taken to be 0.0072 ft-4. This value was based on the capabilities of the fans while running. With the fans not running the loss coefficient would be 0.0278 ft-4.
| |
| With these assumptions the maximum reverse pressure differential across the operating deck was calculated to be 0.65 psi. The following plots have been provided:
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-76 which shows upper and lower compartment pressures.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-77 which shows upper and lower containment temperatures.
| |
| Figure 6.2.1-78 which shows upper to lower containment flowrates.
| |
| Parametric studies have been made with this model. Various effects have been investigated to determine changes in the maximum reverse pressure differential.
| |
| Table 6.2.1-37 gives some of these studies with their results. For Case 6, Figures 6.2.1-79 and 6.2.1-80 give plots similar to Figures 6.2.1-76 and 6.2.1-77. Presented in Table 6.2.1-38, also for Case 6, are the sump temperature and the steam exit flow from the ice condenser, both as a function of time.
| |
| Significant margin exists between the design reverse differential pressures, TVA's Scope psi and 8.6 psi across the operating and the ice condenser lower inlet doors, respectively, and those calculated pressures presented in Table 6.2.1-37.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-41
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Nomenclature SYMBOL DESCRIPTION A Flow area E Total energy J Conversion constant, 778 ft-lbf/Btu K Flow resistance factor M Mass P Pressure R Gas constant R Rate T Temperature V Volume gc Conversion constant, 32.2 ft-lbm/lbf-sec2 h Enthalpy m Mass flow rate between two compartments t Time x Steam-air ratio v Specific volume Density SUBSCRIPT a Air as Air and steam c Suspended or entrained water e Energy i i-th compartment j j-th compartment ij from i-th compartment to j-th compartment s Steam 6.2-42 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 REFERENCES (1) Grimm, N. P., Colenbrander, B. G. C., "Long Term Ice Condenser, Containment Codes - LOTIC Code", WCAP-8354-P-A (Proprietary), July 1974, and WCAP-8355-A (Non-Proprietary), July 1974.
| |
| (2) "Final Report Ice Condenser Full Scale Section Test at the Waltz Mill Facility", WCAP-8282 (Proprietary), February 1974, WCAP-8211 and Appendix (Non-Proprietary), May 1974.
| |
| (3) Hsieh, T., and Raymond, M., "Long Term Ice Condenser Containment Code
| |
| - LOTIC Code", WCAP-8354-P-A Supplement 1 (Proprietary), June 1975, and WCAP-8355-A Supplement 1 (Non-Proprietary), June 1975. Hsieh, T.,
| |
| and Liparulo, N. J., "Westinghouse Long Term Ice Condenser Containment Code - LOTIC-III Code," WCAP-8354-P-A Supplement 2 (Proprietary),
| |
| February 1979.
| |
| (4) Salvatori, R. (approved), "Ice Condenser Containment Pressure Transient Analysis Method," WCAP-8078, March 1973.
| |
| (5) Salvatori, R. (approved), "Ice Condenser Full-Scale Section Test at the Waltz Mill Facility," WCAP-8110, Supplement 6, May 1974.
| |
| (6) Deleted by Amendment 85.
| |
| (7) Deleted by Amendment 85.
| |
| (8) Deleted by Amendment 85.
| |
| (9) R. M. Shepard, et al, "Westinghouse Mass and Energy Release Data for Containment Design," WCAP-8312-A, August 1975.
| |
| (10) Deleted by Amendment 85.
| |
| (11) Yen, Y. C., Zender, A., Zavohik, S. and Tien, C., "Condensation - Melting Heat Transfer in the Presence of Air," Thirteenth National Heat Transfer Conference, AICHE - ASME Denver.
| |
| (12) Crane Technical Paper #410, "Flow of Fluid."
| |
| (13) "Electrical Hydrogen Recombiner for PWR Containments," WCAP-7709-P-A (Proprietary) and WCAP-7820-A (Non-Proprietary) and Supplements 1, 2, 3, and 4.
| |
| (14) Burnett, T. W. T., McIntyre, C. J., Buker, J. C., and Rose, R. P., "LOFTRAN Code Description," WCAP-7907 (Proprietary), June 1972, WCAP-7907-A (Non-Proprietary), April 1984.
| |
| (15) King, H. W., "Handbook of Hydraulics," 4th Edition, 1954.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-43
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (16) Eicheldinger, C., Westinghouse letter NS-CE-1626 to the NRC dated 12/7/77, Responses to NRC Staff Questions Concerning LOTIC-3 Computer Code.
| |
| (17) Eicheldinger, C., Westinghouse letter NS-CE-1250 to the NRC dated 10/22/76, Supplemental Information on the Ice Condenser, Computer Code LOTIC-3.
| |
| (18) Eicheldinger, C., Westinghouse letter NS-CE-1453 to the NRC dated 6/14/77, Responses to NRC Staff Questions Concerning LOTIC-3 Computer Code.
| |
| (19) US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.7, Rev. 2, November 1978, "Control of Combustible Gas Concentrations in Containment Following a Loss of Coolant Accident."
| |
| 6.2-44 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Table 6.2.1-1 Structural Heat Sinks (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| A. Upper Compartment Area Thickness (ft2) (ft) 1.Operating Deck Slab 1 4880 1.1 Concrete Slab 2 18280 .0005 Paint 1.4 Concrete Slab 3 760 .00125 Paint 1.5 Concrete Slab 4 3840 .0208 Stainless Steel 1.5 Concrete 2.Shell and Misc Slab 5 56331 .000625 Paint
| |
| .08 Steel B. Lower Compartment 1.Operating Deck, Crane Wall, and Interior Concrete Slab 6 31963 1.43 Concrete 2.Operating Deck Slab 7 2830 .00125 Paint 1.0 Concrete Slab 8 760 .0005 Paint 1.75 Concrete 3.Interior Concrete and Stainless Stell Slab 9 2770 .021 Stainless Steel 2.0 Concrete A. Lower Compartment 4.Floor*
| |
| Slab 10 15921 .0005 Paint Concrete 5.Misc Steel Slab 11 28500 .000625 Paint Steel C. Ice Condenser 1.Ice Baskets Slab 12 180,628 0.00663 Steel CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-45
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Table 6.2.1-1 Structural Heat Sinks (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 2) 2.Lattice Frames Slab 13 76,650 0.0217 Steel 3.Lower Support Structure Slab 14 28,670 0.0267 Steel 4.Ice Condenser Floor Slab 15 3,336 0.000833 Paint 0.333 Concrete 5.Containment Wall Panels & Containment Shell Slab 16 19,100 1.0 Steel & Insulation 0.0625 Steel Shell 6.Crane Wall Panels and Crane Wall Slab 17 13,0055 1.0 Steel & Insulation 1.0 Concrete
| |
| *In contact with sump.
| |
| 6.2-46 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.1-2 Pump Flow Rates Vs. Time Time after Safeguards SIS Flow to Core Spray Flow RHR Spray Flow Initiation (sec) (gpm) (gpm) (gpm) 0 0 0 0 15 460 0 0 20 1065 0 0 25 4853 0 0 135 4853 4000 0 1768 4853 4000 0 1788 4853* 4000 0 1938 3788** 4000 0 2754 3788 4000 0 2774 3788 0 0 2894 3788 4000** 0 3600 1078 4000 2000 End of transient 1078 4000 2000
| |
| * 3788 gpm from sump
| |
| ** All flow from sump from this point until end of transient CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-47
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-3 Energy Balances Approx. End of Approx. End of Sink Blowdown (Btu) Reflood (Btu) (t=216 sec)
| |
| *Ice Heat Removal 186 (106) 298 (106)
| |
| *Structural Heat Sinks 20 (106) 58 (106)
| |
| *RHR Heat Exchanger 0 0 Heat Removal
| |
| *Spray Heat Exchanger 0 0 Heat Removal Energy Content of Sump 170 (106) 246 (106)
| |
| Ice Melted 0.6 (106) 1.05 (106)
| |
| *Integrated energies, Btu 6.2-48 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-4 Energy Balances Approx. Time of Approx. Time of Ice Bed Melt Out Peak Pressure Sink (Btu) (t=2990) (Btu) (t=3600.9)
| |
| *Ice Heat Removal 557 (106) 567 (106)
| |
| *Structural Heat Sinks 71.4 (106) 88.9 (106)
| |
| *RHR Heat Exchanger 34.7 (106) 48.5 (106)
| |
| Heat Removal
| |
| *Spray Heat Exchanger 20.9 (106) 50.3 (106)
| |
| Heat Removal Energy Content of Sump 644 (106) 611 (106)
| |
| Ice Melted 2.125 (106) 2.125 (106)
| |
| *Integrated energies, Btu CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-49
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-5 Material Property Data Thermal Conductivity VolumetricHeat Capacity Material Btu/hr-ft-°F B/tu/ft3-°F Paint on Steel 0.21 14.0 Paint on Concrete 0.083 28.4 Concrete .8 28.8 Stainless Steel 9.4 56.4 Carbon Steel 26.0 56.4 6.2-50 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-6 TMD Input for Watts Barr (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| Initial Volume PSteam PAir Temperature Element (ft3) (psia) (psia) (°F) 1 28700. 0.3 14.7 120.
| |
| 2 36800.
| |
| 3 70200.
| |
| 4 38800.
| |
| 5 36800.
| |
| 6 25114.
| |
| 25 651000. 0.3 14.7 120 26 11700.
| |
| 27 17900.
| |
| 28 11200.
| |
| 29 18700.
| |
| 30 11200.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-51
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-6 TMD Input for Watts Barr (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| Initial Volume PSteam PAir Temperature Element (ft3) (psia) (psia) (°F) 31 18000. 0.3 14.7 120.
| |
| 32 10100.
| |
| 33 15300.
| |
| 34 13000.
| |
| 35 4400.
| |
| 36 4400.
| |
| 37 9300.
| |
| 50 1400.
| |
| 0.3 14.7 120.
| |
| 6.2-52 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-7 TMD Flow Input Data For Watts Bar (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| Flow PathElement to Flow Path Length Flow Area LossCoefficient Element (ft) (ft2) K AreaRatio a/A 1 to 33 6.5 22. 1.5 0.048 2 to 27 3.5 48. 4.2 0.027 3 to 33 10.2 64. 1.5 0.048 4 to 33 7.9 44. 1.5 0.048 5 to 31 3.5 42. 4.2 0.027 6 to 33 5.7 16. 1.5 0.048 26 to 27 9.0 23. 2.7 0.067 27 to 3 9.3 46. 4.2 0.027 28 to 27 9.0 23. 2.7 0.067 29 to 36 3.7 15. 3.0 0.044 30 to 31 9.0 23. 2.7 0.067 31 to 6 11.0 58. 4.2 0.027 32 to 31 9.0 23. 2.7 0.067 33 to 5 7.8 36. 1.5 0.048 34 to 26 6.6 59. 1.5 0.171 35 to 28 2.8 17. 1.5 0.049 36 to 30 2.8 17. 1.5 0.049 37 to 32 3.2 23. 1.5 0.067 50 to 4 3.6 1.6 1.5 0.002 50 to 4 3.9 2.5 1.5 0.002 50 to 30 3.8 6.8 1.5 0.067 1 to 2 17.3 550. 0.33 0.43 2 to 3 24.2 550. 0.33 0.43 3 to 4 22.3 600. 0.30 0.47 4 to 5 19.7 550. 0.33 0.43 5 to 6 17.2 550. 0.33 0.43 6 to 1 29.4 140. 1.35 0.09 26 to 32 1.0 126. 1.6 0.843 27 to 1 6.9 60. 4.2 0.027 28 to 26 80.0 146. 0.5 0.977 29 to 35 3.8 15. 3.0 0.044 30 to 28 51.0 81. 1.6 0.542 31 to 4 9.3 44. 4.2 0.027 32 to 30 80.0 146. 0.5 0.977 33 to 2 8.1 38. 1.5 0.048 34 to 27 4.5 17. 3.0 0.049 35 to 27 3.7 15. 3.0 0.044 36 to 31 3.1 10. 3.0 0.029 37 to 31 3.4 10. 3.0 0.029 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-53
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-7 TMD Flow Input Data For Watts Bar (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| Flow PathElement to Flow Path Length Flow Area LossCoefficient Element (ft) (ft2) K AreaRatio a/A 40 to 1 10.36 121.9 41 to 2 10.36 144.0 42 to 3 10.36 288.0 43 to 4 10.36 199.4 44 to 5 10.36 155.1 45 to 6 10.36 155.1 6.2-54 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS WATTS BAR Table 6.2.1-8 Calculated Maximum Peak Pressures In Lower Compartment Elements Assuming Unaugmented Flow Element 1 2 3 4 5 6 Peak Pressure (psig) 18.5 14.0 12.8 12.9 13.9 17.9 DECL - 100% Ent.
| |
| Peak Pressure (psig) 16.0 12.0 10.5 10.6 12.1 15.8 DEHL - Ent.
| |
| 6.2-55 WBNP-0
| |
| | |
| 6.2-56 WATTS BAR Table 6.2.1-9 Calculated Maximum Peak Pressures In The Ice Condenser Compartment Assuming Unaugmented Flow Element 40 41 42 43 44 45 Peak Pressure (psig) 13.9 10.3 9.4 9.4 10.2 13.6 DECL - 100% Ent.
| |
| Peak Pressure (psig) 11.5 8.5 7.8 7.8 8.7 11.4 DEHL - Ent.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS WBNP-0
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS WATTS BAR Table 6.2.1-10 Calculated Maximum Differential Pressures Across The Operating Deck Or Lower Crane Wall Assuming Unaugmented Flow Element 1 2 3 4 5 6 Peak P (psi) 16.6 11.2 9.0 9.2 11.0 16.2 DECL - 100% Ent.
| |
| Peak P (psi) 15.7 11.7 8.8 8.9 11.8 15.5 DEHL - 100% Ent.
| |
| 6.2-57 WBNP-0
| |
| | |
| 6.2-58 WATTS BAR Table 6.2.1-11 Calculated Maximum Differential Pressures Across The Upper Crane Wall Assuming Unaugmented Flow Element 7-8-9 10-11-12 13-14-15 16-17-18 19-20-21 22-23-24 Peak P (psi) 7.2 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.0 7.2 DECL - 100% Ent.
| |
| Peak P (psi) 8.4 7.1 6.4 6.3 7.01 8.4 DEHL - 100% Ent.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS WBNP-0
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-12 Sensitivity Studies For D. C. Cook Plant (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| CHANGE MADE CHANGE IN CHANGE IN PEAK FROM BASE OPERATING PRESSURE AGAINST PARAMETER VALUE(1) DECK P(1) THE SHELL(1)
| |
| Blowdown + 10% + 11% + 12%
| |
| Blowdown - 10% - 10% - 12%
| |
| Blowdown - 20% - 20% - 23%
| |
| Blowdown - 50% - 50% - 53%
| |
| Break Compartment Inertial + 10% + 4% + 1%
| |
| Length Break Compartment - 10% - 4% - 1%
| |
| Inertial Length Break Compartment Volume + 10% - 2% - 1%
| |
| Break Compartment Volume - 10% + 2% + 1%
| |
| Break Compartment Vent Areas + 10% - 6% - 5%
| |
| Break Compartment Vent Areas - 10% + 8% + 5%
| |
| Door Port Failure in Break one door port fails +1 - 1%
| |
| Compartment to open Ice Mass + 10% 0 0 Ice Mass - 10% 0 0 Door Inertia + 10% + 1% 0 Door Inertia - 10% - 1% 0 All Inertial Lengths + 10% + 5% + 4%
| |
| All Inertial Lengths - 10% - 5% - 3%
| |
| Ice Bed Loss Coefficients + 10% 0 0 Ice Bed Loss Coefficients - 10% 0 0 Entrainment Level 0% Ent - 27% - 11%
| |
| Entrainment Level 30% Ent - 19% - 15%
| |
| Entrainmnet Level 50% Ent - 13% - 12%
| |
| Entrainment Level 75% Ent - 6% - 6%
| |
| Lower Compartment Loss + 10% 0 0 Coefficients Lower Compartment Loss - 10% 0 0 Coefficients Cross Flow in Lower Plenum low estimate of 0 - 7%
| |
| resistance Cross Flow in Lower Plenum high estimate of 0 - 3%
| |
| resistance Ice Condenser Flow Area + 10% 0 - 3%
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-59
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-12 Sensitivity Studies For D. C. Cook Plant (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| CHANGE MADE CHANGE IN CHANGE IN PEAK FROM BASE OPERATING PRESSURE AGAINST PARAMETER VALUE(1) DECK P(1) THE SHELL(1)
| |
| Ice Condenser Flow Area - 10% 0 + 4%
| |
| Ice Condenser Flow Area + 20% 0 - 6%
| |
| Ice Condenser Flow Area - 20% 0 + 8%
| |
| Initial Pressure in Containment + 0.3 psi + 2% + 2%
| |
| Initial Pressure in Containment - 0.3 psi - 2% - 2%
| |
| Initial Ice Bed Temperature + 15°F 0 0 Initial Ice Bed Temperature - 15°F 0 + 1%
| |
| (1)
| |
| All values shown are to the nearest percent.
| |
| 6.2-60 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-13 Watts Bar Ice Condenser Design Parameters Reactor Containment Volume (net free volume, ft3)
| |
| Upper Compartment 651,000 Ice Compartment 110,520 Lower Compartment 253,114 Lower Compartment (dead-ended) 129,900 Total Containment Volume 1,144,534 NSSS Fraction of Nominal (FON) based on 3,425*
| |
| Reactor Power of, MWt Analysis weight of ice in condenser, 2.125x106 lbs (100% & 0% power DER cases)
| |
| Analysis weight of ice in condenser, 2.025x106 lbs (30% power, small split cases)
| |
| Core Nuclear Power - % FON 100% power cases 1.02 30% power cases 0.30 0% power cases Critical at 0.0
| |
| * Includes RCP power (14 MWt)
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-61
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-14 Allowable Leakage Area For Various Reactor Coolant System Break Sizes 5 ft2 Deck Leak Resultant Peak Break Air Compression Deck Leakage Containment Pressure Size Peak (psig) Area (ft2) (psig)
| |
| Double-ended 7.8 54 12.0 0.6 Double-ended 6.6 40 12.0 3 ft2 6.25 46 12.0 10 inch diameter 5.75 38 12.0 10 inch diameter* 5.75 50 10.7*
| |
| 6 inch diameter 5.5 41 12.0 6 inch diameter* 5.5 50 10.0*
| |
| 2 inch diameter 5.0 50 5.0 2 inch diameter* 4.0 50 4.2*
| |
| 1/2 inch diameter 3.0 >50 3.0
| |
| *This case assumes an upper compartment structural heat sink steam condensation of 6 lb/sec and 30% of deck leakage is air.
| |
| Note:One spray at 4750 gpm at 100°F was assumed for all breaks smaller than the 3 ft2 break.
| |
| 6.2-62 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-15 Blowdown Data Summary Breaks Double Ended Pump Suction 6.2.1-16a
| |
| .6 Double Ended Pump Suction 6.2.1-16b 3 ft2 Pump Suction Split 6.2.1-16c Double Ended Hot Leg 6.2.1-16d Double Ended Cold Leg 6.2.1-16e CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-63
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-16a Blowdown Double-Ended Pump Suction Break Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec) (lbs/sec) (Btu/sec) 1.00000E-08 7.01135E+04 3.92484E+07 2.50331E-02 7.01135E+04 3.92484E+07 1.25218E-01 7.74512E+04 4.34598E+07 2.50276E-01 8.27959E+04 4.67551E+07 3.50283E-01 7.96880E+04 4.53219E+07 4.50334E-01 7.33320E+04 4.21250E+07 5.75504E-01 7.02176E+04 4.07680E+07 7.25475E-01 6.71328E+04 3.94242E+07 8.75455E-01 6.41607E+04 3.80113E+07 1.07552E+00 6.05893E+04 3.61407E+07 1.35026E+00 5.66415E+04 3.40634E+07 1.65024E+00 5.19535E+04 3.16012E+07 1.90023E+00 4.75583E+04 2.92134E+07 2.75014E+00 3.86340E+04 2.43129E+07 4.25035E+00 3.15758E+04 2.32677E+07 5.75034E+00 2.88951E+04 1.86041E+07 7.25076E+00 2.60857E+04 1.69035E+07 8.75090E+00 2.30263E+04 1.55946E+07 1.02500E+01 2.05454E+04 1.41215E+07 1.20020E+01 1.76466E+04 1.23493E+07 1.37519E+01 1.46272E+04 1.04894E+07 1.52508E+01 1.24415E+04 8.99497E+06 1.67506E+01 1.01873E+04 7.17505E+06 1.82507E+01 7.28281E+03 4.82533E+06 1.97504E+01 4.15947E+03 2.87425E+06 2.15006E+01 2.26931E+03 1.32581E+06 2.32505E+01 6.49016E+02 3.73793E+05 2.40056E+01 9.37511E+01 2.71096E+04 2.40112E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 6.2-64 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-16b 0.6 Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec) (lbs/sec) (Btu/sec) 1.00000E-08 4.79640E+04 2.68810E+07 2.50299E-02 4.79640E+04 2.68810E+07 1.25329E-01 6.31848E+04 3.54951E+07 2.75628E-01 6.36324E+04 3.59799E+07 4.00528E-01 6.17803E+04 3.51421E+07 5.25375E-01 5.93017E+04 3.40101E+07 6.75264E-01 5.66199E+04 3.27632E+07 8.25324E-01 5.30648E+04 3.09105E+07 1.00043E+00 4.99152E+04 2.92173E+07 1.25040E+00 4.88309E+04 2.87375E+07 1.55034E+00 4.80839E+04 2.84306E+07 1.85026E+00 4.30301E+04 2.79501E+07 2.75030E+00 3.96863E+04 2.41877E+07 4.50032E+00 2.95092E+04 1.86615E+07 6.25035E+00 2.64339E+04 1.68526E+07 7.75033E+00 2.42472E+04 1.55843E+07 9.25022E+00 2.09389E+04 1.41847E+07 1.10014E+01 1.80135E+04 1.25018E+07 1.30015E+01 1.58736E+04 1.11191E+07 1.47511E+01 1.37137E+04 9.77383E+06 1.65009E+01 1.18047E+04 8.41174E+06 1.82505E+01 9.64089E+03 7.02915E+06 2.00008E+01 7.78744E+03 5.24305E+06 2.20006E+01 4.46210E+03 3.08245E+06 2.37505E+01 2.87242E+03 1.79967E+06 2.55004E+01 1.85402E+03 1.01407E+06 2.75002E+01 6.52229E+02 3.30052E+05 2.85410E+01 9.00244E+01 2.51400E+04 2.85821E+01 0. 0.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-65
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-16c 3.0 FT² Pump Suction Split Break Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec) (lbs/sec) (Btu/sec) 1.00000E-08 2.68063E+04 1.49186E+07 2.50I98E-02 2.68603E+04 1.49186E+07 1.50202E-01 4.56233E+04 2.55286E+07 3.25255E-01 4.50196E+04 2.52160E+07 4.75198E-01 4.38802E+04 2.47597E+07 6.50203E-01 4.19298E+04 2.39053E+07 8.25258E-01 3.97821E+04 2.29166E+07 1.05018E+00 3.73363E+04 2.17363E+07 1.40021E+00 3.44804E+04 2.02816E+07 1.75031E+00 3.24718E+04 1.92259E+07 2.70033E+00 2.73104E+04 1.63721E+07 4.50033E+00 2.34960E+04 1.43062E+07 6.50058E+00 2.11243E+04 1.29734E+07 8.75048E+00 1.95321E+04 1.20108E+07 1.07504E+01 1.69029E+04 1.08458E+07 1.27520E+01 1.45476E+04 9.63951E+06 1.52518E+01 1.32818E+04 8.89267E+06 1.80006E+01 1.16929E+04 7.98823E+06 2.10011E+01 9.93231E+03 6.97085E+06 2.40011E+01 8.21381E+03 5.98077E+06 2.67507E+01 6.58449E+03 5.08452E+06 2.90006E+01 5.35300E+03 4.12997E+06 3.10006E+01 4.08384E+03 2.92654E+06 3.32504E+01 2.42247E+03 1.71390E+06 3.52502E+01 1.76877E+03 1.06222E+06
| |
| .70004E+01 1.86478E+03 7.60013E+05 3.92505E+01 1.33534E+02 1.64594E+05 4.09874E+01 2.44842E+01 2.94524E+04 4.14743E+01 0 0 6.2-66 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-16d Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine Break Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec) (lbs/sec) (Btu/sec) 1.00000E-08 6.96547E+04 4.58031E+07 2.51261E-02 6.96547E+04 4.58031E+07 1.00235E-01 8.15972E+04 5.37630E+07 2.00266E-01 7.34083E+04 4.81065E+07 3.00398E-01 6.98929E+04 4.54532E+07 4.25354E-01 6.68622E+04 4.31261E+07 5.50405E-01 6.46194E+04 4.14575E+07 6.50302E-01 6.31444E+04 4.04248E+07 7.75231E-01 6.16152E+04 3.94045E+07 9.00263E-01 6.01975E+04 3.84834E+07 1.07512E+00 5.87096E+04 3.75333E+07 1.30026E+00 5.71064E+04 3.65080E+07 1.55026E+00 5.50804E+04 3.52799E+07 1.85030E+00 5.18404E+04 3.33336E+07 2.50026E+00 4.53849E+04 2.94695E+07 3.50033E+00 3.89711E+04 2.54537E+07 4.75050E+00 3.55118E+04 2.31258E+07 6.00122E+00 3.37713E+04 2.18334E+07 7.25178E+00 2.94095E+04 1.96306E+07 8.75165E+00 2.47901E+04 1.70620E+07 1.05023E+01 2.07998E+04 1.45049E+07 1.22515E+01 1.66694E+04 1.19824E+07 1.37503E+01 1.28715E+04 9.54153E+06 1.50005E+01 9.30597E+03 6.76967E+06 1.62505E+01 5.50193E+03 4.22690E+06 1.77502E+01 2.38147E+03 2.11086E+06 1.90003E+01 6.88399E+02 5.41005E+05 1.96416E+01 2.41188E+02 2.02620E+05 1.97828E+01 0. 0.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-67
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-16e Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine Break Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec) (lbs/sec) (Btu/sec) 1.00000E-08 5.74645E+04 3.28466E+07 2.50459E-02 5.74645E+04 3.28466E+07 1.00114E-01 9.03492E+04 5.18057E+07 2.00119E-01 9.18449E+04 5.26979E+07 3.25172E-01 9.06893E+04 5.20413E+07 4.50202E-01 8.90442E+04 5.11007E+07 5.50125E-01 8.80348E+04 5.05383E+07 6.75058E-01 8.65350E+04 4.97178E+07 8.00023E-01 8.48007E+04 4.87821E+07 9.00050E-01 8.32524E+04 4.79554E+07 1.02506E+00 8.23989E+04 4.75621E+07 1.25015E+00 7.96964E+04 4.61989E+07 1.50024E+00 7.55285E+04 4.40130E+07 1.70015E+00 7.26571E+04 4.25099E+07 2.15012E+00 6.40333E+04 3.76596E+07 3.00013E+00 5.19763E+04 3.10462E+07 4.25057E+00 4.26906E+04 2.65828E+07 5.50071E+00 3.70909E+04 2.37146E+07 6.75047E+00 3.23565E+04 2.07472E+07 8.00094E+00 2.70288E+04 1.74891E+07 9.25178E+00 2.09152E+04 1.41635E+07 1.07513E+01 1.51420E+04 1.10073E+07 1.20002E+01 9.28263E+03 7.77219E+06 1.32504E+01 6.13172E+03 5.28681E+06 1.45009E+01 3.85781E+03 3.30780E+06 1.57503E+01 2.39742E+03 2.03887E+06 1.72504E+01 7.18563E+02 8.07354E+05 1.82102E+01 1.57874E+02 2.01111E+05 1.84200E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 6.2-68 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS WATTS BAR Table 6.2.1-17 19 Element W Reflood Model Unbroken Equivalent Hydraulic Broken Loop Loop Form Factor Length Diameter Area Area Element (Ft2) (Ft2) K (Ft) (Ft)
| |
| : 1. Hot Leg Nozzle 4.59 13.77 .181 0.0 2.42
| |
| : 2. Hot Leg Piping 4.59 13.77 .447 0.0 2.42
| |
| : 3. Steam Generator Inlet Plenum 4.59 13.77 .442 0.0 2.42
| |
| : 4. Steam Generator Tubes 11.24 33.72 3.01 55.9 .055
| |
| : 5. Steam Generator Outlet Plenum 5.24 15.72 .317 0.0 2.58
| |
| : 6. Crossover Leg Piping 5.24 15.72 .691 0.0 2.58
| |
| : 7. Pump (forward) 4.50 13.50 (1) 0.0 2.4
| |
| : 8. Cold Leg Piping 4.12 12.36 .310 0.0 2.29
| |
| : 9. Cold Leg Inlet Nozzle
| |
| : 10. Around Downcomer (est.)(2) 12.36 .373 0.0 2.29
| |
| : 11. Cold Leg Inlet Nozzle 20.0 0.01 8.0 4.0
| |
| : 12. Cold Leg Piping 4.12 .373 0.0 2.29
| |
| : 13. Pump (reverse) 4.12 .310 0.0 2.29
| |
| : 14. Crossover Leg Piping 4.50 (1) 0.0 2.4
| |
| : 15. Steam Generator Outlet Plenum 5.24 .691 0.0 2.58
| |
| : 16. Steam Generator Tubes 5.24 .317 0.0 2.58
| |
| : 17. Steam Generator Inlet Plenum 11.24 3.01 55.9 0.055
| |
| : 18. Hot leg Piping 4.59 .442 0.0 2.42 4.59 .447 0.0 2.42 (1)The analysis accounts for transient pump resistances due to pump coastdown.
| |
| (2)The path around the downcomer is specified only to provide a loop reference point for pressure at top of downcomer. The frictional pressure drop data are estimated and provide negligible pressure drop.
| |
| 6.2-69 WBNP-0
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-18 Reflood Data Summary Breaks Tables Double-Ended Pump Suction Minimum SI 6.2.1-19a Double-Ended Pump Suction Maximum SI 6.2.1-19b 0.6 Double-Ended Pump Suction Maximum SI 6.2.1-19c 3 ft2 Pump Suction Split Maximum SI 6.2.1-19d Double-Ended Hot Leg Maximum SI 6.2.1-19e Double-Ended Cold Leg Maximum SI 6.2.1-19f 6.2-70 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19a Mass And Energy Releases Post-Blowdown Deps Guillotine Minimum Safeguards Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105) 2.4000000E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 2.5080000E+01 4.4535613E+02 5.7759761E+05 2.5210000E+01 2.3648755E+02 3.0670323E+05 2.6010000E+01 3.6059006E+02 4.6764922E+05 3.1010000E+01 9.7221735E+02 1.2588249E+06 3.2010000E+01 1.0546636E+03 1.3644830E+06 3.2010000E+01 1.0579200E+03 1.3685351E+06 3.6010000E+01 1.0194988E+03 1.3153768E+06 4.7010000E+01 9.2782863E+02 1.1882574E+06 5.0000000E+01 9.0445180E+02 1.1559287E+06 5.4010000E+01 8.7837558E+02 1.1200505E+06 6.4010000E+01 7.2257377E+02 9.1625920E+05 6.4010000E+01 7.2186668E+02 9.1534335E+05 7.4010000E+01 6.1354674E+02 7.7492356E+05 8.4010000E+01 5.4344647E+02 6.8418096E+05 1.0000000E+02 5.0943384E+02 6.3848652E+05 1.4401000E+02 4.2507584E+02 5.2736718E+05 1.9499900E+02(1) 4.0363473E+02 4.9586537E+05 1.9500100E+02 1.5140372E+02 1.8596837E+05 2.0000000E+02 1.5046056E+02 1.8480579E+05 5.0000000E+02 1.0753474E+02 1.3189885E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3065608E+01 1.0172258E+05 1.4999990E+03 7.3412585E+01 8.9786862E+04 1.5000010E+03 8.2843218E+01 1.0131827E+05 2.0000000E+03 7.6853863E+01 9.3879329E+04 5.0000000E+03 5.8619500E+01 7.1208424E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.8076742E+01 5.8075932E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9523537E+01 4.7433722E+04 1.0000000E+06 1.1999430E+01 1.3945929E+04 Notes:
| |
| (1) Entrainment ends at 195.00 seconds CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-71
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19b Mass And Energy Releases Post-Blowdown Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine Maximum Safeguards Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105) 2.4000000E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 2.5010000E+01 3.2911002E+02 4.2682516E+05 2.6010000E+01 3.5178251E+02 4.5623152E+05 2.7010000E+01 5.0915921E+02 6.6025506E+05 3.1010000E+01 1.0174371E+03 1.3171506E+06 3.2010000E+01 1.0403702E+03 1.3534354E+06 3.2010000E+01 1.0456572E+03 1.3524546E+06 3.4010000E+01 1.0250232E+03 1.3239151E+06 3.7010000E+01 9.9838583E+02 1.2869778E+06 4.5010000E+01 9.3259202E+02 1.1959739E+06 5.0000000E+01 8.9624439E+02 1.1458270E+06 5.4010000E+01 8.6810003E+02 1.1073057E+06 7.0010000E+01 7.6576687E+02 9.6822679E+05 8.4010000E+01 6.9297570E+02 8.7060582E+05 1.0000000E+02 6.3350166E+02 7.9081213E+05 1.4401000E+02 4.6917311E+02 5.7788924E+05 1.6699900E+02(1) 4.0929915E+02 5.0188401E+05 1.6700100E+02 1.5871940E+02 1.9457442E+05 2.0000000E+02 1.5026145E+02 1.8417356E+05 5.0000000E+02 1.0753474E+02 1.3163706E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3065608E+01 1.0153356E+05 1.4999990E+03 7.3412585E+01 8.9629853E+04 1.5000010E+03 8.2843218E+01 1.0114041E+05 2.0000000E+03 7.6853863E+01 9.3721244E+04 5.0000000E+03 5.8619500E+01 7.1117839E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.80767425+01 5.8025135E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9523537E+01 4.7410502E+04 5.0000000E+04 3.0543703E+01 3.6316472E+04 1.0000000E+06 1.1999430E+01 1.3945907E+04 Notes:
| |
| (1) Entrainment ends at 167.00 seconds 6.2-72 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19c Mass and Engery Release Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105) 2.8600000E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 2.9670000E+01 5.8926898E+02 7.6569765E+05 3.0110000E+01 2.8303831E+02 3.6775932E+05 3.0610000E+01 3.5426500E+02 4.6029821E+05 3.5610000E+01 1.0271490E+03 1.3321612E+06 3.9610000E+01 9.9780491E+02 1.2906958E+06 4.8610000E+01 9.2177392E+02 1.1854595E+06 5.0000000E+01 9.1222348E+02 1.1722791E+06 5.3610000E+01 8.8265601E+02 1.1315763E+06 6.0610000E+01 8.3700178E+02 1.0689368E+06 7.8610000E+01 7.3032468E+02 9.2426316E+05
| |
| : 9. 9650000E+01 6.3186100E+02 7.9295345E+05 1.0000000E+02 6.2785516E+02 7.8768698E+05 1.2861000E+02 5.1883900E+02 6.4501941E+05 1.4861000E+02 4.5833808E+02 5.6763498E+05 1.7059900E+02 4.0715255E+02 4.9687693E+05 1.7060100E+02 3.9935071E+02 4.9207727E+05 1.7079900E+02(¹) 3.9934552E+02 4.9207062E+05 1.7080100E+02 1.5819036E+02 1. 9489679E+05 2.0000000E+02 1.5109456E+02 1.8612162E+05 5.0000000E+02 1.0771956E+02 1.3248813E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3103659E+01 1.0203180E+05 1.4999990E+03 7.3420381E+01 9.0016658E+04 1.5000010E+03 8. 2851725E+01 1.0157696E+05 2.0000000E+03 7.6855683E+01 9.4100179E+04 5.0000000E+03 5. 8619500E+01 7.1339029E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.80i'6742E+0l 5.8152101E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9523537E+0l 4.7471394E+04 1.0000000E+06 1. 1999430E+01 1.3945923E+04 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-73
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19d Mass And Energy Releases 3 Ft2 Pump Suction Split Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105) 4.1500000E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 4.2680000E+01 6.7191477E+02 8.7107099E+05 4.3510000E+01 2.8142791E+02 3.6477252E+05 4.9510000E+01 9.1074969E+02 1.1783529E+06 5.0000000E+01 9.7405084E+02 1.2598686E+06 5.6510000E+01 9.1843783E+02 1.1825077E+06 6.1510000E+01 8.8458777E+02 1.1354443E+06 6.6510000E+01 8.5389483E+02 1.0928981E+06 7.1510000E+01 8.2181484E+02 1.0485744E+06 8.1510000E+01 7.6530291E+02 9.7113123E+05 9.1510000E+01 7.1653478E+02 9.0491471E+05 1.0000000E+02 6.8022180E+02 8.5581957E+05 1.1374000E+02 6.2007089E+02 7.7568913E+05 1.4151000E+02 5.1920500E+02 6.4333099E+05 1.6151000E+02 4.5633792E+02 5.6224391E+05 1.8250900E+02(1) 4.0140774E+02 4.9234933E+05 1.8251100E+02 2.4851142E+02 3.0475763E+05 1.8289900E+02 2.4851115E+02 3.0475730E+05 1.8290100E+02 1.5640830E+02 1.9180789E+05 2.0000000E+02 1.5254775E+02 1.8705735E+05 5.0000000E+02 1.0824998E+02 1.3255538E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3211201E+01 1.0173360E+05 1.4999990E+03 7.3440869E+01 8.9676032E+04 1.5000010E+03 8.2874008E+01 1.0119188E+05 2.0000000E+03 7.6858829E+01 9.3735455E+04 5.0000000E+03 5.8617894E+01 7.1100225E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.8075425E+01 5.7995931E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9522455E+01 4.7377723E+04 1.0000000E+06 1.1999101E+01 1.3945329E+04 Notes:
| |
| (1) Entrainment ends at 182.51 seconds 6.2-74 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19e Mass And Energy Releases Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105) 1.9800000E+01 0. 0.
| |
| 2.0000000E+01 1.2255363E+03 3.1953427E+05 2.0410000E+01 1.1062387E+03 4.5042751E+05 2.0510000E+01 1.0687712E+03 4.5157073E+05 2.0710000E+01 4.4278860E+02 4.1377824E+05 2.1610000E+01 6.8216035E+02 4.8675568E+05 2.6810000E+01 1.9629021E+03 8.1212676E+05 2.9810000E+01 1.9949716E+03 8.2479356E+05 3.7810000E+01 1.8417703E+03 7.8488364E+05 5.0000000E+01 1.5319554E+03 7.0257474E+05 5.5810000E+01 1.3848108E+03 6.6410252E+05 6.3810000E+01 1.1690957E+03 6.0798705E+05 6.9810000E+01 1.0667600E+03 5.8010146E+05 7.9810000E+01 9.8498857E+02 5.5580778E+05 9.9810000E+01 9.2584339E+02 5.3341112E+05 1.0000000E+02 9.2449665E+02 5.3291239E+05 1.2929900E+02(1) 7.7958780E+02 4.8695008E+05 1.2930100E+02 1.7010402E+02 2.0092702E+05 2.0000000E+02 1.5016167E+02 1.7736875E+05 5.0000000E+03 1.0736836E+02 1.2681619E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3031351E+01 9.8065589E+04 1.4999990E+03 7.3405566E+01 8.6692914E+04 1.5000010E+03 8.2835559E+01 9.7829762E+04 2.0000000E+03 7.6852224E+01 9.0759231E+04 5.0000000E+03 5.8619500E+01 6.9210825E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.8076742E+01 5.6745978E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9523537E+01 4.6627441E+04 5.0000000E+04 3.0543703E+01 3.5992603E+04 1.0000000E+06 1.1999430E+01 1.3996067E+04 Notes:
| |
| (1) Entrainment ends at 129.30 seconds CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-75
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-19f Mass And Energy Releases Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine Time Mass Rate Energy Rate (sec x 102) (lbm/sec x 102) (Btu/sec x 105 1.8400000E+01 4.0206092E+01 5.2178964E+04 2.0000000E+01 3.6096903E+02 4.7095009E+05 2.0640000E+01 1.6422536E+02 2.1425283E+05 2.2410000E+01 1.9902935E+02 2.5965535E+05 2.5410000E+01 2.6405340E+02 3.4446796E+05 2.8410000E+01 2.7290008E+02 3.5598031E+05 3.8410000E+01 2.6793330E+02 3.4941184E+05 5.0000000E+01 2.6735934E+02 3.4856086E+05 5.8410000E+01 2.6665917E+02 3.4757169E+05 7.8410000E+01 2.5637723E+02 3.3399541E+05 9.8410000E+01 2.4678501E+02 3.2133790E+05 1.0000000E+02 2.4609000E+02 3.2041854E+05 1.1841000E+02 2.4070208E+02 3.1326385E+05 2.0000000E+02 2.1941085E+02 2.8498083E+05 2.1841000E+02 2.1466465E+02 2.7869617E+05 3.1841000E+02 1.9143203E+02 2.4797559E+05 4.1841000E+02 1.6864794E+02 2.1802051E+05 4.9699900E+02(1) 1.4895299E+02 1.9230197E+05 4.9700100E+02 1.0753159E+02 1.4090801E+05 5.0000000E+02 1.0753150E+02 1.4090790E+05 1.0000000E+03 8.3020034E+01 1.0820367E+05 1.4999990E+03 7.3403247E+01 9.5261958E+04 1.5000010E+03 8.2833029E+01 1.0749028E+05 2.0000000E+03 7.6851683E+01 9.9318426E+04 5.0000000E+03 5.8619500E+01 7.4302652E+04 1.0000000E+04 4.8076742E+01 5.9723887E+04 2.0000000E+04 3.9523537E+01 4.8014843E+04 5.0000000E+04 3.0543703E+01 3.6285953E+04 1.0000000E+06 1.1999430E+01 1.3945396E+04 Notes:
| |
| (1) Entrainment ends at 497.00 seconds 6.2-76 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-20 Watts Bar Maximum SI Post-Reflood Mass And Energy Release Information STEAM FLOW WATER FLOW TIME MASS ENERGY MASS ENERGY SECONDS LBm/SEC 103 BTU/SEC LBm/SEC 103 BTU/SEC 167 131. 156. 1250. 199.
| |
| 202 128. 152. 1260. 199.
| |
| 302 126. 150. 1260. 188.
| |
| 402 126. 149. 1260. 186.
| |
| 502 126. 148. 1260. 190.
| |
| 602 126. 148. 1260. 186.
| |
| 702 127. 148. 1260. 183.
| |
| 727 127. 148. 1260. 182.
| |
| 732 92.3 106. 1290. 189.
| |
| 802 90.3 104. 1290. 187.
| |
| 902 87.7 101. 1290. 190.
| |
| 1002 85.5 98.9 1300. 186.
| |
| 1102 83.5 96.6 1300. 188.
| |
| 1302 80.2 92.7 1300. 188.
| |
| 1502 77.4 89.5 1310. 186.
| |
| 1637 75.7 87.6 1310. 187.
| |
| INTEGRATED 103LBm 106 BTU 103LBm 106BTU 1637 146. 171. 1890. 277.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-77
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-21 Watts Bar Minimum SI Post-Reflood Mass And Energy Release Information STEAM FLOW WATER FLOW TIME MASS ENERGY MASS ENERGY SECONDS LBm/SEC 103 BTU/SEC LBm/SEC 103 BTU/SEC 195 297. 354. 370. 72.9 200 297. 353. 370. 72.9 300 297. 344. 371. 73.0 305 297. 344. 371. 73.0 310 149. 172. 519. 102.
| |
| 400 140. 161. 528. 104.
| |
| 500 131. 152. 536. 106.
| |
| 600 131. 152. 536. 106.
| |
| 700 124. 143. 543. 107.
| |
| 800 118. 136. 549. 108.
| |
| 900 118. 137. 549. 108.
| |
| 1000 112. 129. 556. 109.
| |
| 1200 105. 121. 563. 111.
| |
| 1400 100. 116. 567. 112.
| |
| 1600 96.6 112. 571. 112.
| |
| 1765 97.1 112. 570. 112.
| |
| INTEGRATED 103 LBm 106 BTU 103 LBm 106 BTU 1765 200. 232. 848. 167.
| |
| 6.2-78 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-22 Available Energy Between 20.2 Psia And 14.7 Psia Broken Loop Stem Generator 3.696 x 106 Btu Unbroken Loop Steam Generator 10.934 x 106 Btu Metal Energy (THIN + THICK) 4.816 x 106 Btu Core Stored .604 x 106 Btu TOTAL 20.05 x 106 Btu CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-79
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 1 of 10)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00000 9.6110000E+03 5.3946543E+06 561.30 0.00101 4.3310502E+04 2.4100795E+07 556.47 0.00201 5.6464849E+04 3.1421870E+07 556.49 0.00301 6.1520189E+04 3.4231211E+07 556.42 0.00401 6.2907110E+04 3.4995181E+07 556.30 0.00501 6.2527557E+04 3.4773203E+07 556.13 0.00601 6.1359842E+04 3.4111223E+07 555.92 0.00701 5.9847065E+04 3.3257665E+07 555.71 0.00801 5.8188878E+04 3.2325854E+07 555.53 0.00900 5.6669717E+04 3.1475995E+07 555.43 0.01001 5.5334196E+04 3.0733067E+07 555.41 0.01101 5.4380116E+04 3.0206926E+07 555.48 0.01202 5.3848579E+04 2.9918413E+07 555.60 0.01301 5.3722982E+04 2.9856042E+07 555.74 0.01403 5.3913587E+04 2.9968612E+07 555.86 0.01503 5.4272426E+04 3.0172312E+07 555.94 0.01602 5.4632246E+04 3.0374580E+07 555.98 0.01700 5.4934445E+04 3.0543650E+07 556.00 0.01803 5.5232000E+04 3.0709908E+07 556.02 0.01903 5.5482063E+04 3.0849637E+07 556.03 0.02004 5.5707346E+04 3.0975819E+07 556.05 0.02101 5.5896536E+04 3.1082274E+07 556.07 0.02205 5.6078108E+04 3.1185010E+07 556.10 0.02300 5.6240106E+04 3.1277094E+07 556.14 0.02402 5.6414116E+04 3.1376145E+07 556.18 0.02504 5.6591029E+04 3.1476717E+07 556.21 0.02606 5.6764048E+04 3.1574969E+07 556.25 0.02702 5.6928226E+04 3.1668125E+07 556.28 0.02806 5.7102526E+04 3.1766906E+07 556.31 0.02902 5.7263203E+04 3.1857866E+07 556.34 0.03003 5.7428068E+04 3.1951113E+07 556.37 0.03101 5.7583531E+04 3.2038998E+07 556.39 0.03202 5.7746706E+04 3.2131054E+07 556.41 0.03304 5.7903222E+04 3.2219280E+07 556.43 0.03401 5.8052067E+04 3.2303155E+07 556.45 0.03501 5.8195321E+04 3.2383957E+07 556.47 0.03601 5.8331171E+04 3.2460804E+07 556.49 0.03703 5.8470775E+04 3.2540002E+07 556.52 0.03801 5.8606356E+04 3.2616877E+07 556.54 6.2-80 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 2 of 10)
| |
| .04012 5.8872406E+04 3.2768324E+07 556.60
| |
| .04101 5.9008660E+04 3.2846908E+07 556.65
| |
| .04201 5.9153822E+04 3.2932609E+07 556.73
| |
| .04300 5.9313778E+04 3.302664 E+07 556.81
| |
| .04401 5.9490981E+04 3.3130077E+07 556.89
| |
| .04501 5.9679056E+04 3.3239170E+07 556.97
| |
| .04600 5.9873576E+04 3.3351437E+07 557.03
| |
| .04700 6.0077022E+04 3.3468342E+07 557.09
| |
| .04800 6.0407806E+04 3.3677849E+07 557.51
| |
| .04900 6.0986562E+04 3.4009096E+07 557.65
| |
| .05000 6.1649802E+04 3.4384106E+07 557.73
| |
| .05100 6.2310578E+04 3.4754624E+07 557.76
| |
| .05200 6.2917709E+04 3.5094556E+07 557.79
| |
| .05302 6.3477117E+04 3.5407841E+07 557.80
| |
| .05401 8.3423661E+04 4.6840941E+07 561.48
| |
| .05501 7.3060968E+04 4.3557140E+07 557.99
| |
| .05601 8.0518030E+04 4.5030731E+07 559.26
| |
| .05700 8.2563578E+04 4.6098557E+07 558.34
| |
| .05800 8.3815137E+04 4.6812762E+07 558.52
| |
| .05902 8.3449231E+04 4.6592537E+07 558.33
| |
| .06000 8.4269954E+04 4.7056412E+07 558.40
| |
| .06101 8.4735994E+04 4.7306624E+07 558.28
| |
| .06202 8.3970123E+04 4.6856778E+07 558.02
| |
| .06300 8.4285244E+04 4.6484834E+07 558.14
| |
| .06403 8.4394816E+04 4.7109317E+07 558.20
| |
| .06502 8.4573828E+04 4.7202661E+07 558.12
| |
| .06611 8.4787755E+04 4.7325979E+07 558.17
| |
| .06703 8.5532633E+04 4.7747200E+07 558.23
| |
| .06802 8.5992772E+04 4.8003061E+07 558.22
| |
| .06902 8.5421297E+04 4.8244326E+07 558.25
| |
| .07004 8.5727778E+04 4.8412801E+07 558.22
| |
| .07102 8.6796001E+04 4.8448914E+07 558.19
| |
| .07203 8.6870937E+04 4.8490730E+07 558.19
| |
| .07304 8.7054880E+04 4.8594295E+07 558.20
| |
| .07402 8.7178558E+04 4.8661343E+07 558.18
| |
| .07501 8.7144334E+04 4.8640448E+07 558.16
| |
| .07605 8.7239117E+04 4.8595232E+07 558.18
| |
| .07706 8.7495940E+04 4.8840764E+07 558.21
| |
| .07803 8.7779389E+04 4.9001329E+07 558.23
| |
| .07905 8.8111858E+04 4.9189719E+07 558.26
| |
| .08014 8.8437477E+04 4.9373735E+07 558.29 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-81
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 3 of 10)
| |
| .08101 8.8713080E+04 4.9529214E+07 558.31
| |
| .08237 8.8970751E+04 4.9673906E+07 558.32
| |
| .08339 9.9150300E+04 4.9774884E+07 558.32
| |
| .08404 9.9278550E+04 4.9845700E+07 558.32
| |
| .08701 8.9412638E+04 5.01462878+07 558.34
| |
| .08800 9.0027554E+04 5.0267688E+07 556.36
| |
| .08903 9.0281189E+04 5.0411020E+07 557.36
| |
| .09005 9.0539626E+04 5.0556703E+07 557.39
| |
| .09101 9.0743822E+04 5.0671166E+07 557.40
| |
| .09207 9.0000901E+04 5.0758235E+07 557.39
| |
| .09305 9.0086401E+04 5.0804912E+07 557.38
| |
| .09412 9.1143158E+04 5.8835575E+07 557.37
| |
| .09510 9.1106623E+04 5.0870216E+07 557.36
| |
| .09608 9.1186559E+04 5.0914656E+07 557.36
| |
| .09708 9.1302596E+04 5.0979666E+07 561.36
| |
| .09806 9.1443286E+04 5.1058782E+07 557.37
| |
| .09903 9.1592551E+04 5.1142472E+07 559.37
| |
| .19006 9.1728833E+04 5.1218292E+07 558.37
| |
| .19514 9.2351448E+04 5.1394011E+07 558.32
| |
| .11012 9.2387798E+04 5.1578304E+07 558.28
| |
| .11511 9.2236260E+04 5.1486172E+07 558.20
| |
| .12001 9.2917771E+04 5.1359571E+07 558.15
| |
| .12514 9.1727154E+04 5.1196412E+07 558.14
| |
| .13014 9.1623195E+04 5.1144798E+07 558.21
| |
| .13511 9.1748740E+04 5.1225781E+07 558.33
| |
| .14004 9.2120808E+04 5.1446366E+07 558.47
| |
| .14512 9.2579812E+04 5.1712621E+07 558.57
| |
| .15007 9.2941215E+04 5.1919892E+07 558.63
| |
| .15519 9.3225048E+04 5.2081879E+07 558.67
| |
| .16003 9.3491097E+04 5.2233133E+07 558.70
| |
| .16505 9.3818313E+04 5.24190993+07 558.73
| |
| .17002 9.4199119E+04 5.2634778E+07 558.76
| |
| .17500 9.4556660E+04 5.2836777E+07 558.78
| |
| .18010 9.4834408E+04 5.2992611E+07 558.79
| |
| .18509 9.4979093E+04 5.3072559E+07 558.78
| |
| .19007 9.4971100E+04 5.3065115E+07 558.75
| |
| .19508 9.4787975E+04 5.2958276E+07 558.70
| |
| .20001 9.4482682E+04 5.2783541E+07 558.66
| |
| .21003 9.3857870E+04 5.2426175E+07 558.57
| |
| .22004 9.3482892E+04 5.2212471E+07 558.52
| |
| .23008 9.3115899E+04 5.2007458E+07 558.52
| |
| .24014 9.2880327E+04 5.1879691E+07 558.56 6.2-82 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 4 of 10)
| |
| .25011 9.2987393E+04 5.1899210E+07 558.61
| |
| .26085 9.3088912E+04 5.2004007E+07 558.65
| |
| .27007 9.3293866E+04 5.2120524E+07 558.67
| |
| .28013 9.3546973E+04 5.2264903E+07 558.70
| |
| .29015 8.3725635E+04 5.2365366E+07 558.71
| |
| .30009 9.3670696E+04 5.2332535E+07 558.69
| |
| .31008 9.3507989E+04 5.2239258E+07 558.66 5.2040402E+07 558.62
| |
| .34021 9.2638976E+04 5.1748157E+07 558.60
| |
| .35012 9.2708694E+04 5.1789509E+07 558.63
| |
| .36001 9.2722621E+04 5.1797589E+07 558.63
| |
| .37009 9.2570379E+04 5.1711187E+07 558.61
| |
| .38006 9.2414695E+04 5.1623414E+07 558.61
| |
| .39010 9.2271423E+04 5.1542499E+07 558.60
| |
| .40010 9.2084414E+04 5.1436520E+07 558.58
| |
| .41010 9.1843519E+04 5.1300115E+07 558.56
| |
| .42012 9.1577114E+04 5.1149514E+07 558.54
| |
| .43000 9.1310985E+04 5.0999398E+07 558.52
| |
| .44012 9.1118166E+04 5.0891429E+07 558.52
| |
| .45008 9.1177214E+04 5.0987004E+07 558.54
| |
| .46010 9.1130754E+04 5.0901754E+07 558.56
| |
| .47012 9.1171899E+04 5.0925777E+07 558.57
| |
| .48011 9.1141485E+04 5.0908756E+07 558.57
| |
| .49018 9.1030159E+04 5.0845649E+07 558.56
| |
| .50000 9.0877513E+04 5.0759274E+07 558.55
| |
| .51009 9.0716741E+04 5.0668508E+07 558.54
| |
| .52016 9.0525631E+04 5.0550518E+07 558.52
| |
| .53004 9.0280616E+04 5.0422042E+07 558.50
| |
| .54012 9.0027339E+04 5.0279431E+07 558.49
| |
| .55066 9.9853472E+04 5.0182236E+07 558.49
| |
| .56012 9.9756392E+04 5.0128690E+07 558.50
| |
| .57015 9.9702675E+04 5.0099544E+07 558.51
| |
| .58001 9.9656269E+04 5.0074286E+07 558.51
| |
| .59012 9.9574430E+04 5.0028693E+07 558.52
| |
| .60022 9.9437753E+04 4.9951947E+07 558.51
| |
| .61017 9.9276720E+04 4.9861529E+07 558.51
| |
| .62017 9.9112503E+04 4.9769422E+07 558.50
| |
| .63018 9.8927891E+04 4.9665729E+07 558.49
| |
| .64017 9.8714678E+04 4.9545884E+07 558.49
| |
| .65015 9.3497653E+04 4.9424142E+07 558.48
| |
| .66017 9.8310815E+04 4.9319743E+07 558.48
| |
| .67013 9.8164091E+04 4.9238154E+07 558.48
| |
| .68016 9.8043186E+04 4.9171145E+07 558.49 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-83
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 5 of 10)
| |
| .69053 8.7936650E+04 4.9112289E+07 558.50
| |
| .70013 8.7833343E+04 4.9055160E+07 558.50
| |
| .71015 8.7699937E+04 4.8980863E+07 558.51
| |
| .72002 8.7515577E+04 4.8877576E+07 558.50
| |
| .73008 8.7289861E+04 4.8751064E+07 558.50
| |
| .74014 8.7057520E+04 4.8620990E+07 558.49
| |
| .75005 8.6822139E+04 4.8489298E+07 558.49
| |
| .76008 8.6586328E+04 4.8357560E+07 558.49
| |
| .77012 8.6371277E+14 4.8237750E+07 558.49
| |
| .78012 8.6187553E+04 4.8135776E+07 558.50
| |
| .81011 8.5732780E+04 4.7883581E+07 558.52
| |
| .82014 8.5520138E+04 4.7765060E+07 558.52
| |
| .83011 8.5279840E+04 4.7631116E+07 558.53
| |
| .84001 8.5205251E+04 4.7592350E+07 558.56
| |
| .85012 8.5219901E+04 4.7603442E+07 558.60
| |
| .85617 8.5236961E+04 4.7615294E+07 558.62
| |
| .87004 8.5239912E+04 4.7613376E+07 558.65
| |
| .88005 8.5224810E+04 4.7612265E+07 558.67
| |
| .89012 8.5153610E+04 4.7573612E+07 558.68
| |
| .90013 8.5034214E+04 4.7507903E+07 558.69
| |
| .91018 8.4921660E+04 4.7446462E+07 558.71
| |
| .92003 8.4789254E+04 4.7373665E+07 558.72
| |
| .93003 8.4585424E+04 4.7260284E+07 558.73
| |
| .94006 8.4332775E+04 4.7119694E+07 558.73
| |
| .95004 8.4133386E+04 4.7009576E+07 558.75
| |
| .96805 8.4001069E+04 4.6937622E+07 558.77
| |
| .97019 8.3879090E+04 4.6871592E+07 558.80
| |
| .98017 8.3749242E+04 4.6801373E+07 558.83
| |
| .99016 8.3650306E+04 4.6748791E+07 558.86 1.00013 8.3577220E+04 4.6710517E+07 558.89 1.01003 8.3483239E+04 4.6660040E+07 558.92 1.02009 8.3363850E+04 4.6595179E+07 558.94 1.03008 8.3228098E+04 4.6521139E+07 558.96 1.04013 8.3054020E+04 4.6425558E+07 558.98 1.05007 8.2852281E+04 4.6314604E+07 559.00 1.06002 8.2670415E+04 4.6215242E+07 559.03 1.07002 8.2522495E+04 4.6135141E+07 559.06 1.08015 8.2370134E+04 4.6052391E+07 559.09 1.09014 8.2204789E+04 4.5962487E+07 559.12 1.10008 8.2058899E+04 4.5883869E+07 559.16 1.11016 8.1925541E+04 4.5812566E+07 559.20 1.12013 8.1778838E+04 4.5733459E+07 559.23 1.13009 8.1614966E+04 4.5644519E+07 559.27 6.2-84 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 6 of 10) 1.14014 8.1440550E+04 4.5549601E+07 559.30 1.15001 8.1233556E+04 4.5436190E+07 559.33 1.16016 8.0973459E+04 4.5290008E+07 559.36 1.17009 8.0728542E+04 4.5158681E+07 559.39 1.18005 8.0505981E+04 4.5037156E+07 559.43 1.19012 8.0276950E+04 4.4911852E+07 559.46 1.20014 8.0035318E+04 4.4779364E+07 559.50 1.21009 7.9809170E+04 4.4655876E+07 559.53 1.22016 7.9592878E+14 4.4537896E+07 559.57 1.23000 7.9352507E+04 4.4406088E+07 559.61 1.24005 7.9096790E+04 4.4266220E+07 559.65 1.25005 7.8854282E+04 4.4133853E+07 559.69 1.28004 7.8874567E+04 4.3707164E+07 559.81 1.29005 7.7872559E+04 4.3597579E+07 559.86 1.31002 7.7659289E+04 4.3481315E+07 559.90 1.31001 7.7437311E+04 4.3359385E+07 559.93 1.32002 7.7200854E+04 4.3229663E+07 559.96 1.33004 7.6991619E+04 4.3115571E+07 560.00 1.34011 7.6778950E+04 4.2999371E+07 560.04 1.35008 7.6585125E+04 4.2893425E+07 560.07 1.36005 7.6481499E+04 4.2793469E+07 560.11 1.37017 7.6219116E+04 4.2694227E+07 560.15 1.38018 7.6034026E+04 4.2593341E+07 560.19 1.39004 7.5849854E+04 4.2492871E+07 560.22 1.40005 7.5667828E+04 4.2393603E+07 560.26 1.41010 7.5482159E+04 4.2292249E+07 560.29 1.42010 7.5301664E+04 4.2193864E+07 560.33 1.43011 7.6139111E+04 4.2105856E+07 560.37 1.44001 7.5009647E+04 4.2036718E+07 560.42 1.45008 7.4931627E+04 4.1196682E+07 560.47 1.46010 7.4867239E+04 4.1963757E+07 560.51 1.47017 7.4753854E+04 4.1902791E+07 560.54 1.48013 7.4584355E+04 4.1810194E+07 560.58 1.49012 7.4392609E+04 4.1705259E+07 560.61 1.50012 7.4197644E+04 4.1598646E+07 560.65 1.51013 7.4006729E+04 4.1494259E+07 560.68 1.52018 7.3815196E+04 4.1389571E+07 560.72 1.53011 7.3936081E+04 4.1291938E+07 560.76 1.54014 7.3469148E+04 4.1201423E+07 560.80 1.55011 7.3320510E+04 4.1121431E+07 560.84 1.56014 7.3181275E+04 4.1046863E+07 560.89 1.57010 7.3026251E+04 4.0963136E+07 560.94 1.58010 7.2837043E+04 4.0859867E+07 560.98 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-85
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 7 of 10) 1.59014 7.2631221E+04 4.0747358E+07 561.02 1.61016 7.2432964E+04 4.0639399E+07 561.06 1.61016 7.2278283E+04 4.0556143E+07 561.11 1.62016 7.2205320E+04 4.0519020E+07 561.16 1.63013 7.2141973E+04 4.0487008E+07 561.21 1.64018 7.2049835E+04 4.0438786E+07 561.26 1.65012 7.1952016E+04 4.0387622E+07 561.31 1.66000 7.1844712E+04 4.0331199E+07 561.37 1.67014 7.1713907E+14 4.0261546E+07 561.42 1.68057 7.1575164E+04 4.0187249E+07 561.47 1.69009 7.1433733E+04 4.0111463E+07 561.52 1.70017 7.1277095E+04 4.0027105E+07 561.57 1.71018 7.1122032E+04 3.9943672E+07 561.62 1.75021 7.0507943E+04 3.9613307E+07 561.83 1.76009 7.0358714E+04 3.9533318E+07 561.88 1.77019 7.0222660E+04 3.9460948E+07 561.94 1.78019 7.0103256E+04 3.9398041E+07 562.00 1.79014 7.0001645E+04 3.9345011E+07 562.12 1.80016 6.9902190E+04 3.9293287E+07 562.18 1.81014 6.9809830E+04 3.9245446E+07 562.24 1.82015 6.9723055E+04 3.9200754E+07 562.29 1.83015 6.9630793E+04 3.9152920E+07 562.35 1.84003 6.9530524E+04 3.9100463E+07 562.41 1.85001 6.9432184E+04 3.9049105E+07 562.47 1.86011 6.9343257E+04 3.9003180E+07 562.52 1.87003 6.9260802E+04 3.8960691E+07 562.58 1.88007 6.9176562E+04 3.8917304E+07 562.63 1.89010 6.9092618E+04 3.8873771E+07 562.69 1.90007 6.9003582E+04 3.8827388E+07 562.74 1.91019 6.8908110E+04 3.8777285E+07 562.79 1.92010 6.8805926E+04 3.8723321E+07 562.84 1.93016 6.8697856E+04 3.8665875E+07 562.89 1.94013 6.8580875E+04 3.8603405E+07 562.94 1.95012 6.8467934E+04 3.8543229E+07 562.99 1.96015 6.8363888E+04 3.8488157E+07 563.04 1.97008 6.8266519E+04 3.8436705E+07 563.09 1.98019 6.8166411E+04 3.8383543E+07 563.13 1.99010 6.8062479E+04 3.8328037E+07 563.17 2.00009 6.7955066E+04 3.8270409E+07 563.21 2.01004 6.7847138E+04 3.8212316E+07 563.25 2.02017 6.7766440E+04 3.8169703E+07 563.29 2.03017 6.7709804E+04 3.8140337E+07 563.33 2.04017 6.7640349E+04 3.8103566E+07 563.36 6.2-86 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 8 of 10) 2.05012 6.7567787E+04 3.8064924E+07 563.36 2.06017 6.7489652E+04 3.8023025E+07 563.39 2.07014 6.7395491E+04 3.7971956E+07 563.42 2.08012 6.7294517E+04 3.7916962E+07 563.45 2.09012 6.7180594E+04 3.7854570E+07 563.47 2.10000 6.7053291E+04 3.7784487E+07 563.50 2.11005 6.6918837E+04 3.7710383E+07 563.52 2.12005 6.6783490E+04 3.7635639E+07 563.55 2.13015 6.6634430E+14 3.7553098E+07 563.57 2.14013 6.6483182E+04 3.7469266E+07 563.59 2.15015 6.6334740E+04 3.7386995E+07 563.61 2.16011 6.6191907E+04 3.7307832E+07 563.63 2.17006 6.6059863E+04 3.7234710E+07 563.65 2.18002 6.5933205E+04 3.7164554E+07 563.67 2.22006 6.5472840E+04 3.6909501E+07 563.74 2.23010 6.5360076E+04 3.6847037E+07 563.75 2.24010 6.5251847E+04 3.6787039E+07 563.77 2.25007 6.5145767E+04 3.6728253E+07 563.79 2.26016 6.5051047E+04 3.6675851E+07 563.80 2.27009 6.4966735E+04 3.6629350E+07 563.82 2.28000 6.4871310E+04 3.6576445E+07 563.83 2.29019 6.4761651E+04 3.6515617E+07 563.85 2.30004 6.4647948E+04 3.6452469E+07 563.86 2.31012 6.4535167E+04 3.6389939E+07 563.88 2.32009 6.4424230E+04 3.6348461E+07 563.89 2.33002 6.4315209E+04 3.6268106E+07 563.91 2.34022 6.4206194E+04 3.6207774E+07 563.93 2.35007 6.4100408E+04 3.6149250E+07 563.95 2.36008 6.3989278E+04 3.6087769E+07 563.97 2.37011 6.3868104E+04 3.6020573E+07 563.98 2.38011 6.3745218E+04 3.5952544E+07 564.00 2.39013 6.3629468E+04 3.5888539E+07 564.02 2.40008 6.3516321E+04 3.5826065E+07 564.05 2.41016 6.3407662E+04 3.5766110E+07 564.07 2.42012 6.3298226E+04 3.5705745E+07 564.09 2.43004 6.3189783E+04 3.5645942E+07 564.11 2.44010 6.3079669E+04 3.5585210E+07 564.13 2.45013 6.2968324E+04 3.5523846E+07 564.15 2.46012 6.2858904E+04 3.5463541E+07 564.18 2.47009 7.2751233E+04 3.5414285E+07 564.20 2.48011 7.2649538E+04 3.5348400E+07 564.22 2.49010 7.2546417E+04 3.5291722E+07 564.25 2.50017 7.2441011E+04 3.5233761E+07 564.27 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-87
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 9 of 10) 2.51015 6.2360248E+04 3.5189781E+07 564.30 2.52017 6.2285701E+04 3.5149251E+07 564.32 2.53002 6.2213377E+04 3.5109968E+07 564.35 2.54011 6.2144447E+04 3.5072628E+07 564.37 2.55004 6.2074492E+04 3.5034700E+07 564.40 2.56011 6.2002522E+04 3.4995675E+07 564.42 2.57012 6.1925868E+04 3.4954001E+07 564.45 2.58007 6.1839278E+04 3.4906740E+07 564.48 2.59017 6.1751078E+14 3.4858631E+07 564.50 2.60012 6.1655475E+04 3.4806378E+07 564.53 2.61012 6.1557127E+04 3.4752559E+07 564.56 2.62017 6.1453393E+04 3.4695764E+07 564.59 2.63012 6.1345872E+04 3.4636880E+07 564.62 2.64017 6.1236417E+04 3.4576903E+07 564.65 2.65000 6.1120804E+04 3.4513455E+07 564.68 2.69015 6.0636936E+04 3.4247943E+07 564.80 2.70015 6.0514075E+04 3.4180534E+07 564.84 2.71015 6.0392973E+04 3.4114134E+07 564.87 2.72001 6.0275870E+04 3.4049934E+07 564.90 2.73007 6.0158531E+04 3.3985641E+07 564.93 2.74011 6.0146178E+04 3.3924017E+07 564.97 2.75004 5.9935107E+04 3.3863317E+07 565.00 2.76011 5.9827207E+04 3.3804290E+07 565.03 2.77002 5.9721999E+04 3.3746760E+07 565.06 2.78011 5.9617017E+04 3.3689833E+07 565.10 2.78012 5.9516318E+04 3.3634378E+07 565.13 2.80007 5.9424684E+04 3.3584464E+07 565.16 2.81011 5.9332760E+04 3.3534409E+07 565.19 2.82007 5.9239848E+04 3.3483771E+07 565.22 2.83021 5.9146625E+04 3.3432986E+07 565.26 2.84003 5.9056308E+04 3.3383826E+07 565.29 2.85010 5.8965263E+04 3.3334296E+07 565.32 2.86006 5.8878112E+04 3.3286969E+07 565.35 2.87012 5.8792590E+04 3.3240574E+07 565.39 2.88011 5.8703158E+04 3.3191991E+07 565.42 2.89003 5.8611039E+04 3.3141918E+07 565.46 2.90000 5.8516521E+04 3.3090534E+07 565.49 2.91008 5.8420275E+04 3.3038213E+07 565.53 2.92007 5.8323527E+04 3.2985689E+07 565.56 2.93019 5.8224442E+04 3.2931900E+07 565.60 2.94006 5.8124578E+04 3.2877642E+07 565.64 2.95006 5.8018131E+04 3.2819800E+07 565.68 2.96010 5.7908517E+04 3.2760201E+07 565.72 6.2-88 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-23 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine (Page 10 of 10) 2.97010 5.7797561E+04 3.2699923E+07 565.77 2.98015 5.7687325E+04 3.2640079E+07 565.81 2.99002 5.7576594E+04 3.2580065E+07 565.86 3.00006 5.7464688E+04 3.2519421E+07 565.90 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-89
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 1 of 7)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00000 9.5000000E+03 6.1732900E+06 649.82 0.00250 8.3366021E+04 5.3981726E+07 647.53 0.00502 7.7261661E+04 4.9885082E+07 645.66 0.00751 6.9212037E+04 4.4671873E+07 645.44 0.01002 6.9198929E+04 4.4701697E+07 645.99 0.01251 7.0256102E+04 4.5378071E+07 645.90 0.01502 7.0488357E+04 4.5540990E+07 646.08 0.01750 7.1061056E+04 4.5928796E+07 646.33 0.02001 7.1751507E+04 4.6383734E+07 646.45 0.02251 7.2329964E+04 4.6764991E+07 646.55 0.02501 7.2847529E+04 4.7105934E+07 646.64 0.02751 7.3317785E+04 4.7415620E+07 646.71 0.03000 7.3729839E+04 4.7687553E+07 646.79 0.03251 7.4102693E+04 4.7933725E+07 646.86 0.03503 7.4425566E+04 4.8146411E+07 646.91 0.03750 7.4680137E+04 4.8313842E+07 646.94 0.04002 7.4861813E+04 4.8433649E+07 646.97 0.04251 7.4970099E+04 4.8506310E+07 647.01 0.04502 7.5032184E+04 4.8550423E+07 647.07 0.04750 7.5091651E+04 4.8596843E+07 647.17 0.05002 7.5182404E+04 4.8666717E+07 647.32 0.05252 7.5339506E+04 4.8784748E+07 647.53 0.05501 7.5615681E+04 4.8985032E+07 647.82 0.05752 7.6070086E+04 4.9303128E+07 648.13 0.06003 7.6618468E+04 4.9677350E+07 648.37 0.06250 7.7167510E+04 5.0046721E+07 648.55 0.06502 7.7719314E+04 5.0413314E+07 648.66 0.06751 7.8269593E+04 5.0773994E+07 648.71 0.07002 7.8788572E+04 5.1111466E+07 648.72 0.07255 7.9317101E+04 5.1952175E+07 648.69 0.07501 7.9810365E+04 5.1767914E+07 648.64 0.07753 8.0303796E+04 5.2081424E+07 648.55 0.08001 8.0766439E+04 5.2373661E+07 648.46 0.08252 8.1217125E+04 5.2656350E+07 648.34 0.08506 8.1642762E+04 5.2921379E+07 648.21 0.08756 8.2029389E+04 5.3160708E+07 648.07 0.09002 8.2387885E+04 5.3380563E+07 647.92 0.09250 8.2708495E+04 5.3574748E+07 647.75 0.09501 8.2989585E+04 5.3742451E+07 647.58 0.09753 8.3215688E+04 5.3873165E+07 647.39 0.10008 8.3360910E+04 5.3950565E+07 647.19 0.10251 8.3384152E+04 5.3948819E+07 646.99 6.2-90 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 2 of 7) 0.10504 8.3224047E+04 5.3827401E+07 646.78 0.10758 8.2846812E+04 5.3565471E+07 646.56 0.11010 8.2310335E+04 5.3203143E+07 646.37 0.11251 8.1735809E+04 5.2818443E+07 646.21 0.11505 8.1098574E+04 5.2396220E+07 646.08 0.11757 8.0492200E+04 5.1995488E+07 645.97 0.12002 7.9906381E+04 5.1608231E+07 645.86 0.12255 7.9318382E+04 5.1220985E+07 645.76 0.12510 7.8761980E+04 5.0855277E+07 645.68 0.12764 7.8253342E+04 5.0521446E+07 645.61 0.13016 7.7799330E+04 5.0223807E+07 645.56 0.13263 7.7397664E+04 4.9959595E+07 645.49 0.13508 7.7031158E+04 4.9718321E+07 645.43 0.13762 7.6689163E+04 4.9492689E+07 645.37 0.14012 7.6380797E+04 4.9287963E+07 645.29 0.14260 7.6093060E+04 4.9096220E+07 645.21 0.14502 7.5829184E+04 4.8919745E+07 645.13 0.14758 7.5565368E+04 4.8742549E+07 645.04 0.15014 7.5315976E+04 4.8574325E+07 644.94 0.15256 7.5093228E+04 4.8423506E+07 644.83 0.15502 7.4878984E+04 4.8277964E+07 644.75 0.15758 7.4673649E+04 4.8137969E+07 644.64 0.16009 7.4492138E+04 4.8013597E+07 644.55 0.16260 7.4333611E+04 4.7904109E+07 644.45 0.16519 7.4195208E+04 4.7807226E+07 644.34 0.16754 7.4087107E+04 4.7730165E+07 644.24 0.17019 7.3982177E+04 4.7654413E+07 644.13 0.17254 7.3903197E+04 4.7595794E+07 644.03 0.17519 7.3821471E+04 4.7533480E+07 643.90 0.17758 7.3750923E+04 4.7478555E+07 643.77 0.18002 7.3679828E+04 4.7422428E+07 643.63 0.18270 8.3600631E+04 4.7359686E+07 643.47 0.18511 8.3530498E+04 4.7303918E+07 643.32 0.18772 8.3456456E+04 4.7244677E+07 643.17 0.19014 8.3391431E+04 4.7192111E+07 643.02 0.19261 8.3329933E+04 4.7141607E+07 642.87 0.19518 8.3272436E+04 4.7041292E+07 642.71 0.19762 8.3221499E+04 4.7049902E+07 642.57 0.20002 8.3178925E+04 4.7012004E+07 642.43 0.20252 8.3137257E+04 4.6974010E+07 642.27 0.20503 8.3098113E+04 4.6937497E+07 642.12 0.20750 8.3060530E+04 4.6902038E+07 641.96 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-91
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 3 of 7) 0.21008 7.3019492E+04 4.6863606E+07 641.80 0.21271 7.2971863E+04 4.6820468E+07 641.62 0.21504 7.2924285E+04 4.6778800E+07 641.47 0.21762 7.2863276E+04 4.6727166E+07 641.30 0.22021 7.2792031E+04 4.6668884E+07 641.13 0.22253 7.2719274E+04 4.6611036E+07 640.97 0.22502 7.2632208E+04 4.6543311E+07 640.81 0.22772 7.2528486E+04 4.6469108E+07 640.63 0.23020 7.2 24247E+04 4.6385682E+07 640.47 0.23265 7.2315195E+04 4.6304601E+07 640.32 0.23510 7.2201162E+04 4.6220523E+07 640.16 0.23754 7.2042610E+04 4.6133707E+07 640.01 0.24018 7.1951100E+04 4.6037989E+07 639.85 0.24256 7.1830885E+04 4.5950825E+07 639.71 0.24520 7.1697100E+04 4.5853958E+07 639.55 0.24769 7.1572088E+04 4.5763462E+07 639.40 0.25022 7.1446885E+04 4.5672780E+07 639.26 0.25255 7.1334337E+04 4.5591101E+07 639.12 0.25518 7.1211486E+04 4.5501645E+07 638.96 0.25761 7.1102069E+04 4.5421652E+07 638.82 0.26008 7.0995474E+04 4.5343313E+07 638.68 0.26261 7.0891562E+04 4.5266449E+07 638.53 0.26519 7.0790622E+04 4.5191236E+07 638.38 0.26733 7.0702525E+04 4.5125078E+07 638.24 0.27009 7.0611282E+04 4.5056173E+07 638.09 0.27266 7.0523851E+04 4.4989715E+07 637.94 0.27520 7.0442164E+04 4.4926984E+07 637.79 0.27758 7.0368655E+04 4.4869978E+07 637.64 0.28017 7.0292576E+04 4.4810367E+07 637.48 0.28254 7.0224050E+04 4.4756397E+07 637.34 0.28513 7.0151601E+04 4.4699085E+07 637.18 0.28770 7.0081456E+04 4.4643369E+07 637.02 0.29012 7.0015740E+04 4.4591188E+07 636.87 0.29270 6.9947068E+04 4.4536538E+07 636.72 0.29504 6.9885463E+04 4.4487471E+07 636.58 0.29760 6.9818055E+04 4.4433794E+07 636.42 0.30018 6.9750621E+04 4.4380130E+07 636.27 0.302 5 6.9688876E+04 4.4331051E+07 636.13 0.30520 6.9619964E+04 4.4276364E+07 635.97 0.30766 6.9555942E+04 4.4225658E+07 635.83 0.31020 6.9490098E+04 4.4173606E+07 635.68 0.31256 6.9428756E+04 4.4125198E+07 635.55 6.2-92 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 4 of 7) 0.31502 6.9364785E.04 4.4074786E+07 635.41 0.31776 6.9292945E+04 4.4018417E+07 635.25 0.32026 6.9228329E+04 4.3967794E+07 635.11 0.32278 6.9162511E+04 4.3916352E+07 634.97 0.32500 6.9104546E+04 4.3871173E+07 634.85 0.32751 6.9039481E+04 4.3820519E+07 634.72 0.33003 6.8974226E+04 4.3769791E+07 634.58 0.33255 6.8909148E+04 4.3719287E+07 634.45 0.33507 6.8844266E+04 4.3669001E+07 634.32 0.33759 6.8779396E+04 4.3618794E+07 634.18 0.34012 6.8714551E+04 4.3568709E+07 634.05 0.34264 6.8679846E+04 4.3518771E+07 633.42 0.34517 6.8585131E+04 4.3468932E+07 633.80 0.34770 6.8520434E+04 4.3418197E+07 633.67 0.35022 6.8455793E+04 4.3369591E+07 633.54 0.35275 6.8391227E+04 4.3320125E+07 633.42 0.35528 6.8326749E+04 4.3270811E+07 633.29 0.35753 6.8269558E+04 4.3227127E+07 633.18 0.36006 6.8205347E+04 4.3179176E+07 633.06 0.36260 6.8141484E+04 4.3129458E+07 632.44 0.36514 6.8077896E+04 4.3081018E+07 632.82 0.34769 6.8014722E+04 4.3032888E+07 632.70 0.37076 6.7952063E+04 4.2985130E+07 632.58 0.37255 6.7896887E+04 4.2943032E+07 632.47 0.37515 6.7835502E+04 4.2896141E+07 632.36 0.37777 6.7775061E+04 4.2849802E+07 632.24 0.38012 6.7722086E+04 4.2809071E+07 632.13 0.38280 6.7663597E+04 4.2763911E+07 632.01 0.38521 6.7612661E+04 4.2724370E+07 631.90 0.38766 6.7562816E+04 4.2685441E+07 631.79 0.39014 6.7514175E+04 4.2647182E+07 631.68 0.39267 6.7466809E+04 4.2609616E+07 631.56 0.39525 6.7420771E+04 4.2572755E+07 631.45 0.39755 6.7381410E+04 4.2541088E+07 631.35 0.40024 6.7338142E+04 4.2505555E+07 631.23 0.40263 6.7301204E+04 4.2475007E+07 631.12 0.40505 6.7265696E+04 4.2445335E+07 631.01 0.40754 6.7230577E+04 4.2415619E+07 630.90 0.41008 6.7196212E+04 4.2368271E+07 630.78 0.41265 6.7162616E+04 4.2357391E+07 630.67 0.41522 6.7129564E+04 4.2328625E+07 630.55 0.41759 6.7099339E+04 4.2302439E+07 630.44 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-93
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 5 of 7) 0.42016 6.7047039E+04 4.2274388E+06 630.33 0.42263 6.7035782E+04 4.2247295E+07 630.22 0.42509 6.7004568E+04 4.2220317E+07 630.11 0.42767 6.6971284E+04 4.2191629E+07 630.00 0.43024 6.6936789E+04 4.2162210E+07 629.88 0.43281 6.6901398E+04 4.2132309E+07 629.77 0.43510 6.6868952E+04 4.2105162E+07 629.67 0.43779 6.6829329E+04 4.2072364E+07 629.55 0.44015 6.6792662E+04 4.204242 E+07 629.45 0.44263 6.6752389E+04 4.2010062E+07 629.34 0.44503 6.6712436E+04 4.1978278E+07 629.24 0.44776 6.6669435E+04 4.1941233E+07 629.13 0.45031 6.6620128E+04 4.1905799E+07 629.03 0.45260 6.6577783E+04 4.1872966E+07 628.93 0.45518 6.6529174E+04 4.1835621E+07 628.83 0.45779 6.6474055E+04 4.1797358E+07 628.73 0.46006 6.6434522E+04 4.1763609E+07 628.64 0.46262 6.6383646E+04 4.1725280E+07 628.55 0.46518 6.6332450E+04 4.1686877E+07 628.45 0.46775 6.6280967E+04 4.1648404E+07 628.36 0.47030 6.6229638E+04 4.1610156E+07 628.27 0.47255 6.6184 40E+04 4.1576904E+07 628.19 0.47512 6.6134141E+04 4.1539141E+07 628.10 0.47771 6.6083853E+04 4.1501763E+07 628.02 0.48032 6.6034259E+04 4.1464870E+07 627.93 0.18262 6.5991507E+04 4.1433014E+07 627.85 0.18527 6.5943495E+04 4.1397152E+07 627.77 0.18762 6.5902325E+04 4.1366304E+07 627.69 0.49034 6.5856311E+04 4.1331688E+07 627.60 0.49274 6.5817000E+04 4.1301975E+07 627.51 0.49517 6.5778874E+04 4.1273019E+07 627.45 0.49765 6.5741321E+04 4.1244325E+07 627.37 0.50024 6.5703604E+04 4.1215508E+07 627.29 0.51012 6.5570446E+04 4.1111667E+07 626.98 0.52016 6.5456120E+04 4.1020126E+07 626.68 0.53003 6.5347836E+04 4.0933067E+07 626.39 0.54020 6.5234080E+04 4.0842628E+07 626.09 0.55004 6.5114485E+04 4.0750005E+07 625.82 0.56004 6.4980058E+04 4.06448900+07 625.56 0.57018 6.4832681E+04 4.0540699E+07 625.31 0.58018 6.4683520E+04 4.0432982E+07 625.09 0.59033 6.4537352E+04 4.0328174e+07 624.88 6.2-94 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 6 of 7) 0.60028 6.4405682E+04 4.0233863E+07 624.69 0.61006 6.4291379E+04 4.0151570E+07 624.52 0.62028 6.4185296E+04 4.0074475E+07 624.36 0.63028 6.4088543E+04 4.0003799E+07 624.20 0.64037 6.3991051E+04 3.9932853E+07 624.04 0.65032 6.3890693E+04 3.9860535E+07 623.89 0.66003 6.3787662E+04 3.9787307E+07 623.75 0.67035 6.3673290E+04 3.970717 E+07 623.61 0.68020 6.3560494E+04 3.9629252E+07 623.49 0.69008 6.3444844E+04 3.9550368E+07 623.38 0.70037 6.3323594E+04 3.9468650E+07 623.29 0.71029 6.3206689E+04 3.9390687E+07 623.20 0.72021 6.3092848E+04 3.9315454E+07 623.14 0.73010 6.2978206E+04 3.9240792E+07 623.09 0.74021 6.2863312E+04 3.9166115E+07 623.04 0.75002 6.2754080E+04 3.9094680E+07 622.98 0.76000 6.2641845E+04 3.9021892E+07 622.94 0.77025 6.2527645E+04 3.8948268E+07 622.90 0.78006 6.2420690E+04 3.8879349E+07 622.86 0.79033 6.2310561E+04 3.8809018E+07 622.83 0.80016 6.2205817E+04 3.8742510E+07 622.81 0.81028 6.2097447E+04 3.8674058E+07 622.80 0.82032 6.1988143E+04 3.8605382E+07 622.79 0.83026 6.1877208E+04 3.8536023E+07 622.78 0.84010 6.1764525E+04 3.8465890E+07 622.78 0.85016 6.1646530E+04 3.8392779E+07 622.79 0.86014 6.1528079E+04 3.8319750E+07 622.80 0.87013 6.1410582E+04 3.8247723E+07 622.82 0.88014 6.1295125E+04 3.8177357E+07 622.84 0.89016 6.1181918E+04 3.8108690E+07 622.88 0.90014 6.1070276E+04 3.8041150E+07 622.91 0.91001 6.0959110E+04 3.7973934E+07 622.94 0.92006 6.0843976E+04 3.7904302E+07 622.98 0.93002 6.0728862E+04 3.7834735E+07 623.01 0.94022 6.0611678E+04 3.7764186E+07 623.05 0.95016 6.0502372E+04 3.7698968E+07 623.10 0.96032 6.0399882E+04 3.7638703E+07 623.16 0.97003 6.0310970E+04 3.7587283E+07 623.22 0.98019 6.0224576E+04 3.7537977E+07 623.30 0.99034 6.0141262E+04 3.7490808E+07 623.38 1.00009 6.0061803E+04 3.7446007E+07 623.46 1.05030 5.9639533E+04 3.7210078E+07 623.92 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-95
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-24 Break Mass And Energy Flow From A Double-Ended Hot Leg Break (Page 7 of 7) 1.10009 5.9161129E+04 3.6942041E+07 624.43 1.15005 5.8600069E+04 3.6621801E+07 624.94 1.20022 5.8110574E+04 3.6350936E+07 625.55 1.25009 5.7618787E+04 3.6075665E+07 626.11 1.30021 5.7172718E+04 3.5828693E+07 626.67 1.35018 5.6709129E+04 3.5567732E+07 627.20 1.40030 5.6244826E+04 3.5305636E+07 627.71 1.45011 5.5752608E+04 3.5023683E+07 628.20 1.50013 5.5230766E+04 3.4722152E+07 628.67 1.55010 5.4683919E+04 3.4403984E+07 629.14 1.60014 5.4098362E+04 3.4059730E+07 629.59 1.65001 5.3515705E+04 3.3718514E+07 630.07 1.70007 5.2934335E+04 3.3379803E+07 630.59 1.75010 5.2337170E+04 3.3032036E+07 631.14 1.80003 5.1749965E+04 3.2692856E+07 631.75 1.85003 5.1168201E+04 3.2359058E+07 632.41 1.90028 5.0574787E+04 3.2018724E+07 633.10 1.95028 4.9983327E+04 3.1680180E+07 633.81 2.00032 4.9412836E+04 3.1356166E+07 634.58 6.2-96 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-0 Table 6.2.1-25 Double-Ended Pump Suction LOCA Event Time (sec)
| |
| Rupture 0 Accumulator flow starts 15.5 Assumed initiation of ECCS 24.0 End of blowdown 24.0 Assumed initiation of spray system 55.0 Accumulators empty 56.1 End of reflood 167.0 Low level alarm of refueling water storage tank 1095 Beginning of recirculation phase of safeguards operation 1455 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-97
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26 Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Max.
| |
| S.I., W/Froth (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE EOF EOFIL Time (seconds) 0.00 24.00 167.00 727.00 1642.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 173.01 940.91 2213.82 Total Added 0.00 0.00 173.01 940.91 2213.82 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 887.95 1655.85 2928.76 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 64.99 148.27 148.27 148.27 Accumulator 210.30 156.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 221.66 148.27 148.27 148.27 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 493.21 587.76 657.89 734.41 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 151.92 849.69 2046.08 Total Effluent 0.00 493.21 739.68 1507.58 2780.49 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 714.87 887.95 1655.85 2928.76 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE EOF EOFIL Time (seconds) 0.00 24.00 167.00 727.00 1642.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 816.61 816.61 816.61 816.61 816.61 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 15.22 67.44 154.00 Decay Heat 0.00 9.86 31.63 91.29 168.24
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -3.58 -3.58 1.09 8.83 Total Added 0.00 6.28 43.27 159.82 331.07 TOTAL AVAILABLE 816.61 822.89 859.89 976.43 1147.68 6.2-98 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26 Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Max.
| |
| S.I., W/Froth (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION 302.29 17.33 28.61 28.61 28.61 Reactor Coolant 18.51 13.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 Accumulator 28.38 11.12 4.03 4.03 4.03 Core Stored 25.01 20.50 9.44 9.44 9.44 Thin Metal 30.78 30.78 23.74 23.74 23.74 Thick Metal 411.65 411.00 343.05 262.31 161.39 Steam Generator 816.61 504.51 408.86 328.13 227.21 Total Contents EFFULENT 0.00 318.39 437.48 520.34 608.85 Break Flow 0.00 0.00 13.37 118.15 291.00 ECCS Spill 0.00 318.39 450.85 638.49 899.85 Total Effluent 816.61 822.90 859.71 966.62 1127.06 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-99
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26a Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE EOF EOFIL Time (seconds) 0.00 24.00 195.00 310.00 1770.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 105.76 182.51 1156.92 Total Added 0.00 0.00 105.76 182.51 1156.92 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 820.70 897.45 1871.86 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 64.99 148.27 148.27 148.27 Accumulator 210.30 156.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 221.66 148.27 148.27 148.27 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 493.21 589.64 623.74 790.41 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 82.80 125.45 933.18 Total Effluent 0.00 493.21 672.44 749.19 1723.59 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 714.87 820.70 897.46 1871.86 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE EOF EOFIL Time (seconds) 0.00 24.00 195.00 310.00 1770.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 816.61 816.61 816.61 816.61 816.61 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 9.31 14.53 80.79 Decay Heat 0.00 9.86 35.25 49.10 177.93
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -3.58 -3.58 -3.10 3.05 Total Added 0.00 6.28 40.98 60.53 261.77 TOTAL AVAILABLE 816.61 822.89 857.59 877.14 1078.38 6.2-100 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26a Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 302.29 17.33 28.61 28.61 28.61 Accumulator 18.51 13.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 28.38 11.12 4.03 4.03 4.03 Thin Metal 25.01 20.50 9.44 9.44 9.44 Thick Metal 30.78 30.78 22.70 22.70 22.70 Steam Generator 411.65 411.00 343.01 315.50 155.42 Total Contents 816.61 504.51 409.79 380.28 220.20 EFFULENT Break Flow 0.00 318.39 440.26 480.34 673.10 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 7.29 15.68 174.65 Total Effluent 0.00 318.39 447.55 496.02 847.75 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 816.61 822.90 857.33 876.30 1067.95
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-101
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26b Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 28.58 170.80 1500.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 184.22 1978.94 Total Added 0.00 0.00 184.22 1978.94 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 899.16 2693.88 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 77.61 160.89 160.89 Accumulator 210.30 144.97 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 222.58 160.89 160.89 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 492.37 584.17 711.87 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 154.10 1821.12 Total Effluent 0.00 492.37 738.27 2532.99 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 714.95 899.16 2693.88 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 28.58 170.80 1500.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 817.91 817.91 817.91 817.91 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 16.21 174.15 Decay Heat 0.00 10.84 32.24 157.24
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -4.05 -4.05 -4.05 Total Added 0.00 6.79 44.40 327.34 TOTAL AVAILABLE 817.91 824.70 862.32 1145.25 6.2-102 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26b Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Pump Suction Guillotine, Min. S.I., W/Froth (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 302.29 20.12 31.40 31.40 Accumulator 18.51 12.76 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 28.38 10.23 4.03 4.03 Thin Metal 25.01 20.09 9.44 9.44 Thick Metal 30.78 30.78 23.77 11.79 Steam Generator 412.95 414.26 348.72 340.02 Total Contents 817.91 508.23 417.36 398.67 EFFULENT Break Flow 0.00 316.48 432.48 589.38 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 13.56 160.26 Total Effluent 0.00 316.48 446.04 749.64 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 817.91 824.71 863.40 1146.31
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-103
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26c Watts Bar Four Loop Plant 3 Ft2 Pump Suction (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 41.50 182.50 1500.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 171.82 1950.74 Total Added 0.00 0.00 171.82 1950.74 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 886.76 2665.68 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 100.22 183.50 183.50 Accumulator 210.30 127.36 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 227.58 183.50 183.50 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 487.28 575.98 702.28 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 127.28 1779.90 Total Effluent 0.00 487.28 703.26 2482.18 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 714.86 886.76 2665.68 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 41.50 182.50 1500.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 812.86 812.86 812.86 812.86 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 15.12 171.67 Decay Heat 0.00 13.23 33.83 157.33
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -18.89 -18.89 -18.89 Total Added 0.00 -5.66 30.06 310.11 TOTAL AVAILABLE 812.86 807.20 842.92 1122.97 6.2-104 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26c Watts Bar Four Loop Plant 3 Ft2 Pump Suction (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 302.29 24.06 35.34 35.34 Accumulator 18.51 11.21 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 28.38 7.65 4.03 4.03 Thin Metal 25.01 19.08 9.44 9.44 Thick Metal 30.78 30.78 23.82 11.80 Steam Generator 407.90 401.58 335.52 327.62 Total Contents 812.86 494.35 408.14 388.22 EFFULENT Break Flow 0.00 312.84 424.59 579.14 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 11.20 156.63 Total Effluent 0.00 312.84 435.79 735.77 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 812.86 807.19 843.93 1123.99
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-105
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26d Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 19.80 129.30 1500.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 138.77 1989.52 Total Added 0.00 0.00 138.77 1989.52 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 853.71 2704.46 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 66.31 241.15 272.69 Accumulator 210.30 164.85 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 231.16 241.15 272.69 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 482.76 612.56 746.76 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 1685.01 Total Effluent 0.00 482.76 612.56 2431.77 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 713.92 853.71 2704.46 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 19.80 129.30 1500.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 814.71 814.71 814.71 814.71 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 12.21 175.08 Decay Heat 0.00 8.83 26.33 156.93
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 Total Added 0.00 8.65 38.36 331.83 TOTAL AVAILABLE 814.71 823.35 853.07 1146.53 6.2-106 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26d Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Hot Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 302.29 17.63 36.96 39.74 Accumulator 18.51 14.51 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 28.38 9.73 4.03 4.03 Thin Metal 25.01 21.02 9.44 9.44 Thick Metal 30.78 30.78 25.11 11.78 Steam Generator 409.74 406.21 389.32 386.72 Total Contents 814.71 499.87 464.86 451.71 EFFULENT Break Flow 0.00 323.39 389.59 547.99 ECCS Spill 0.00 0.00 0.00 148.28 Total Effluent 0.00 323.39 389.59 696.27 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 814.71 823.26 854.45 1147.98
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-107
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26e Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| MASS BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 18.42 497.00 1500.00 Mass (103 lbm)
| |
| AVAILABLE Initial RCS & Acc 714.94 714.94 714.94 714.94 ADDED MASS Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 640.46 1994.73 Total Added 0.00 0.00 184.22 1994.73 TOTAL AVAILABLE 714.94 714.94 1355.40 2709.67 DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 504.64 40.50 123.78 123.78 Accumulator 210.30 119.07 0.00 0.00 Total Contents 714.94 159.57 123.78 123.78 EFFLUENT Break Flow 0.00 502.29 601.39 686.99 ECCS Spill 0.00 52.60 630.23 1898.91 Total Effluent 0.00 554.89 1231.62 2585.90 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 714.94 714.46 1355.40 2709.90 ENERGY BALANCE 0.0 EOB EOE REC Time (seconds) 0.00 18.42 497.00 1500.00 Energy (106 Btu)
| |
| AVAILABLE In RCS, Acc, & S Gen 816.50 816.50 816.50 816.50 ADDED ENERGY Pumped Injection 0.00 0.00 56.36 175.54 Decay Heat 0.00 8.47 68.97 156.77
| |
| **Heat from Sec. 0.00 -3.71 -3.71 -3.71 Total Added 0.00 4.76 121.62 328.59 TOTAL AVAILABLE 816.50 821.25 938.11 1145.09 6.2-108 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-26e Watts Bar Four Loop Plant Double-Ended Cold Leg Guillotine, Max. S.I (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| DISTRIBUTION Reactor Coolant 302.29 11.35 22.63 22.63 Accumulator 18.51 10.48 0.00 0.00 Core Stored 28.38 16.03 4.03 4.03 Thin Metal 25.01 21.09 9.44 9.44 Thick Metal 30.78 30.78 15.76 11.78 Steam Generator 411.54 410.71 374.72 362.62 Total Contents 816.50 500.43 426.57 410.50 EFFULENT Break Flow 0.00 316.24 444.84 556.54 ECCS Spill 0.00 4.63 55.46 167.10 Total Effluent 0.00 320.87 500.30 723.64 TOTAL ACCOUNTABLE 816.50 821.30 926.87 1134.14
| |
| **Steam out and feedwater into the steam generator.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-109
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-27a Steam Line Break Blowdown Mass Flow Rate, m Energy Flow Rate, e Time (sec) (lbm/sec) (106 Btu/sec) 0 19670 23.388 0.1150 19670 23.388 0.1151 14260 16.955 1.550 14260 16.955 1.551 21680 19.340 2.501 21680 19.340 2.502 42560 24.855 10.00 42560 24.855 6.2-110 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-27b Steam Generator Enclosure Geometry Nodes Volume (ft3) 51, 56 5193 52, 57 1577 53, 58 1276 54, 59 1648 55, 60 1363 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-111
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-27c Steam Generator Enclosure Flow Path Data LI DH A LEO Path k F (ft) (ft) (ft²) (ft) a/A H51 1.50 0.02 18.5 9.2 174.7 11.7 0.70 H52, H57 2.04 0.02 19.0 5.0 36.9 13.4 0.31 H53, H58 2.04 0.02 22.3 5.0 36.9 16.4 0.56 H54, H59 2.04 0.02 19.6 5.8 35.9 13.6 0.34 H55, H60 2.04 0.02 22.9 5.8 35.9 17.0 0.59 R51, R56 0.23 0.02 9.6 5.4 108.9 7.6 0.29 R52, R57 0.00 0.02 14.8 5.4 108.9 14.8 1.0 R53, R58 0.00 0.02 14.8 6.0 88.2 14.8 1.0 R54, R59 2.78 0.02 7.8 3.9 89.6 5.7 0.82 R55, R60 2.78 0.02 8.3 4.2 77.1 6.2 0.9 A51, 156 0.23 0.02 9.2 6.0 88.2 7.5 0.24 6.2-112 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.1-27d Peak Differential Pressure - Steam Generator Enclosure Across Enclosure Walls Nodes Differential Press. (psi) Time (sec) 51 - Upper Compartment 38.0 3.69 52 - " " 37.0 3.75 53 - " " 37.0 3.76 54 - " " 36.8 3.77 55 - " " 36.8 3.77 Across Steam Generator Vessel Nodes Differential Press. (psi) Time (sec) 3-2 0.28 0.016 5-4 0.10 0.024 Across Steam Generator Separator Wall Nodes Differential Press. (psi) Time (sec) 55-59 19.39 0.0376 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-113
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.1-28 Mass And Energy Release Rates Into Pressurizer Enclosure Time (sec) Mass Flow (103 lbm/sec) Energy Flow (106 Btu/sec) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00251 5.0473 3.0977 0.00502 5.2333 3.2013 0.01002 5.1051 3.1226 0.01251 5.0746 3.1029 0.01755 5.3833 3.2753 0.02505 5.5402 3.3601 0.03259 5.8746 3.5479 0.04002 5.9221 3.5716 0.05005 5.6865 3.4332 0.07250 5.7877 3.4868 0.09001 5.4917 3.3157 0.11253 5.9404 3.5710 0.13756 5.5454 3.3445 0.15755 5.6392 3.3979 0.17760 5.4721 3.3026 0.19254 5.5189 3.3291 0.21254 5.4725 3.3025 0.23508 5.5465 3.3446 0.27752 5.5345 3.3378 0.35027 5.3649 3.2411 0.38001 5.2985 3.2031 0.41515 5.3825 3.2507 0.45006 5.2660 3.1842 0.57002 5.2492 3.1738 0.77015 5.1816 3.1336 1.00005 5.1562 3.1169 2.00015 5.0326 3.0400 6.2-114 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.1-29 Pressurizer Geometric Data Node Volume (ft3) 51 2262 52 502 53 667 54 647 Flow Path k f L1(ft) DH(ft) A(ft2) LEQ(ft) a/A 51-52 0.5 0.02 13.3 3.3 20.9 12.1 0.16 51-53 0.5 0.02 13.8 4.8 27.7 12.1 0.21 51-54 0.5 0.02 13.8 4.8 26.9 12.1 0.21 53-52 0.0 0.02 8.0 3.5 42.6 8.0 0.28 54-52 0.0 0.02 8.0 1.5 18.5 8.0 0.12 53-54 0.0 0.02 8.0 0.9 11.3 8.0 0.06 52-lower 1.0 0.02 12.0 3.3 22.1 12.0 1.00 compartment 53-lower 1.0 0.02 12.0 4.8 27.7 12.0 1.00 compartment 54-lower 1.0 0.02 12.0 4.8 24.4 12.0 1.00 compartment CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-115
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-29a Peak Differential Pressure - Pressurizer Enclosure Across Enclosure Walls Nodes Differential Press. (psi) Time (sec) 51 - Upper Compartment 11.4 0.06 52 - Upper Compartment 7.7 0.10 53 - Upper Compartment 7.7 0.10 54 - Upper Compartment 7.7 0.10 Across Pressurizer Vessel Nodes Differential Press. (psi) Time (sec) 52 - 53 -0.04 0.038 52 - 54 -0.23 0.046 53 - 54 -0.20 0.050 6.2-116 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg (Page 1 of 5)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.00000 0. 0. 0.00 0.00251 1.1982845E+04 6.7296740E+06 561.61 0.00502 1.5308269E+04 8.5974676E+06 561.62 0.00751 1.7398501E+04 9.7720743E+06 561.66 0.01001 1.9131092E+04 1.0741761E+07 561.48 0.01253 1.9948352E+04 1.1193906E+07 561.14 0.01503 1.9716482E+04 1.1050978E+07 560.49 0.01753 2.1905036E+04 1.2288321E+07 560.98 0.02006 2.2170478E+04 1.2426731E+07 560.51 0.02255 2.1560830E+04 1.2069870E+07 559.81 0.02506 2.1315153E+04 1.1923450E+07 559.39 0.02751 2.1626356E+04 1.2094688E+07 559.26 0.03001 2.1729350E+04 1.2147779E+07 559.05 0.03254 2.2084361E+04 1.2345775E+07 559.03 0.03503 2.2542872E+04 1.2603165E+07 559.08 0.03757 2.2895385E+04 1.2800602E+07 559.09 0.04009 2.3203939E+04 1.2973383E+07 559.10 0.04255 2.3446963E+04 1.3108981E+07 559.09 0.04502 2.3464854E+04 1.3115753E+07 558.95 0.04752 2.3298089E+04 1.3017402E+07 558.73 0.05001 2.3145127E+04 1.2927663E+07 558.55 0.05266 2.3018004E+04 1.2853122E+07 558.39 0.05514 2.2950194E+04 1.2812973E+07 558.29 0.05757 2.2904460E+04 1.2785675E+07 558.22 0.06012 2.2779154E+04 1.2713027E+07 558.10 0.06257 2.2510846E+04 1.2559119E+07 557.91 0.06500 2.2164087E+04 1.2360966E+07 557.70 0.06763 2.1888594E+04 1.2203861E+07 557.54 0.07009 2.1850009E+04 1.2182079E+07 557.53 0.07259 2.2019590E+04 1.2278820E+07 557.63 0.07503 2.2242956E+04 1.2406073E+07 557.75 0.07759 2.2352310E+04 1.2468054E+07 557.80 0.08002 2.2278656E+04 1.2425609E+07 557.74 0.08253 2.2036897E+04 1.2287536E+07 557.59 0.08504 2.1670113E+04 1.2078517E+07 557.38 0.08752 2.1266578E+04 1.1848983E+07 557.16 0.09004 2.0857542E+04 1.1617001E+07 556.97 0.09260 2.0466616E+04 1.1395523E+07 556.79 0.09500 2.0201194E+04 1.1245397E+07 556.67 0.09751 2.0053059E+04 1.1161858E+07 556.62 0.10007 2.0025022E+04 1.1146521E+07 556.63 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-117
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg (Page 2 of 5)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.10515 2.0170943E+04 1.1230305E+07 556.76 0.11011 2.0365487E+04 1.1341279E+07 556.89 0.11505 2.0647554E+04 1.1501747E+07 557.05 0.12008 2.0944972E+04 1.1670752E+07 557.21 0.12502 2.0977664E+04 1.1688856E+07 557.20 0.13007 2.0780412E+04 1.1576250E+07 557.08 0.13509 2.0500682E+04 1.1417226E+07 557.92 0.14001 2.0096382E+04 1.1187990E+07 556.72 0.14508 1.9569603E+04 1.0889944E+07 556.47 0.15009 1.9235427E+04 1.0701397E+07 556.34 0.15504 1.9138491E+04 1.0647134E+07 556.32 0.16006 1.9034644E+04 1.0588880E+07 556.30 0.16505 1.8879080E+04 1.0501358E+07 556.24 0.17007 1.8748148E+04 1.0427857E+07 556.21 0.17514 1.8720580E+04 1.0412805E+07 556.22 0.18005 1.8785810E+04 1.0450146E+07 556.28 0.18504 1.8911550E+04 1.0521664E+07 556.36 0.19010 1.9101126E+04 1.0629209E+07 556.47 0.19507 1.9311878E+04 1.0748514E+07 556.58 0.20009 1.9465602E+04 1.0835436E+07 556.65 0.21252 1.9617023E+04 1.0920644E+07 556.69 0.22507 1.9458748E+04 1.0830336E+07 556.58 0.23759 1.9647389E+04 1.0937376E+07 556.68 0.25011 1.9804565E+04 1.1026138E+07 556.75 0.26253 1.9395307E+04 1.0793667E+07 556.51 0.27516 1.8760813E+04 1.0435112E+07 556.22 0.28761 1.8860759E+04 1.0492777E+07 556.33 0.30014 1.9381793E+04 1.0787950E+07 556.60 0.31261 1.9557340E+04 1.0886714E+07 556.66 0.32509 1.9428795E+04 1.0813221E+07 556.56 0.33757 1.9460687E+04 1.0831309E+07 556.57 0.35003 1.9510288E+04 1.0859152E+07 556.59 0.36251 1.9334731E+04 1.0759415E+07 556.48 0.37512 1.9237392E+04 1.0704384E+07 556.44 0.38764 1.9172556E+04 1.0667882E+07 556.41 0.40007 1.9255351E+04 1.0715044E+07 556.47 0.41263 1.9518505E+04 1.0864131E+07 556.61 0.42512 1.9566788E+04 1.0890843E+07 556.60 0.43769 1.9443279E+04 1.0820460E+07 556.51 0.45005 1.9309158E+04 1.0744438E+07 556.44 0.46260 1.9325193E+04 1.0753755E+07 556.46 6.2-118 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-86 Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg (Page 3 of 5)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 0.47515 1.9427001E+04 1.0811564E+07 556.52 0.48751 1.9463982E+04 1.0832327E+07 556.53 0.50010 1.9412566E+04 1.0802979E+07 556.49 0.52505 1.9416927E+04 1.0805655E+07 556.51 0.55001 1.9520981E+04 1.0864335E+07 556.55 0.57500 1.9439249E+04 1.0817886E+07 556.50 0.60009 1.9432289E+04 1.0814194E+07 556.51 0.62502 1.9570908E+04 1.0892620E+07 556.57 0.65001 1.9484134E+04 1.0843384E+07 556.52 0.67502 1.9537413E+04 1.0873742E+07 556.56 0.70006 1.9557525E+04 1.0885106E+07 556.57 0.72503 1.9556471E+04 1.0884559E+07 556.57 0.75008 1.9566953E+04 1.0890551E+07 556.58 0.77503 1.9575425E+04 1.0895394E+07 556.59 0.80011 1.9613175E+04 1.0916838E+07 556.61 0.82503 1.9623035E+04 1.0922366E+07 556.61 0.85012 1.9607042E+04 1.0913377E+07 556.60 0.87505 1.9625149E+04 1.0923689E+07 556.62 0.90005 1.9642366E+04 1.0933451E+07 556.63 0.92504 1.9652418E+04 1.0939158E+07 556.63 0.95005 1.9665495E+04 1.0946566E+07 556.64 0.97509 1.9657157E+04 1.0941870E+07 556.64 1.00024 1.9674801E+04 1.0951903E+07 556.65 1.02501 1.9674211E+04 1.0951587E+07 556.65 1.05002 1.9685832E+04 1.0958208E+07 556.65 1.07501 1.9689581E+04 1.0960360E+07 556.66 1.10003 1.9688612E+04 1.0959861E+07 556.66 1.12501 1.9688440E+04 1.0959833E+07 556.66 1.15013 1.9691682E+04 1.0961746E+07 556.67 1.17512 1.9694412E+04 1.0963374E+07 556.67 1.20008 1.9690643E+04 1.0961334E+07 556.68 1.22506 1.9686074E+04 1.0958870E+07 556.68 1.25010 1.9682378E+04 1.0956913E+07 556.69 1.27506 1.9685597E+04 1.0958900E+07 556.70 1.30002 1.9688096E+04 1.0960455E+07 556.70 1.32505 1.9673388E+04 1.0952302E+07 556.71 1.35006 1.9668391E+04 1.0949690E+07 556.72 1.37504 1.9669445E+04 1.0950509E+07 556.73 1.40009 1.9673705E+04 1.0950139E+07 556.74 1.42508 1.9668652E+04 1.0950505E+07 556.75 1.45004 1.9667081E+04 1.0950053E+07 556.76 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-119
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg (Page 4 of 5)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 1.47501 1.9675943E+04 1.0955165E+07 556.78 1.50004 1.9668050E+04 1.0950970E+07 556.79 1.52500 1.9665596E+04 1.0949895E+07 556.80 1.55005 1.9671043E+04 1.0953307E+07 556.82 1.57502 1.9666568E+04 1.0951104E+07 556.84 1.60008 1.9662702E+04 1.0949279E+07 556.86 1.62509 1.9658419E+04 1.0947234E+07 556.87 1.65008 1.9652327E+04 1.0944186E+07 556.89 1.67508 1.9641445E+04 1.0938449E+07 556.91 1.70000 1.9631684E+04 1.0933366E+07 556.92 1.72523 1.9622211E+04 1.0928465E+07 556.94 1.75002 1.9611372E+04 1.0922805E+07 556.96 1.77506 1.9600265E+04 1.0917009E+07 556.98 1.80004 1.9586316E+04 1.0909616E+07 556.00 1.82507 1.9570844E+04 1.0901377E+07 557.02 1.85004 1.9558044E+04 1.0894662E+07 557.04 1.87501 1.9547428E+04 1.0889183E+07 557.06 1.90005 1.9533703E+04 1.0881955E+07 557.09 1.92505 1.9518588E+04 1.0873945E+07 557.11 1.95013 1.9504270E+04 1.0866400E+07 557.13 1.97508 1.9490671E+04 1.0854264E+07 557.15 2.00001 1.9475975E+04 1.0851512E+07 557.17 2.02504 1.9460138E+04 1.0843124E+07 557.20 2.05011 1.9443525E+04 1.0834315E+07 557.22 2.07503 1.9425610E+04 1.0824775E+07 557.24 2.10004 1.9406458E+04 1.0814547E+07 557.27 2.12507 1.9386749E+04 1.0804030E+07 557.29 2.15003 1.9366596E+04 1.0793269E+07 557.31 2.17504 1.9344857E+04 1.0781622E+07 557.34 2.20000 1.9321966E+04 1.0769339E+07 557.36 2.22510 1.9298174E+04 1.0756568E+07 557.39 2.25001 1.9274722E+04 1.0743996E+07 557.41 2.27507 1.9250836E+04 1.0731182E+07 557.44 2.30008 1.9225729E+04 1.0717684E+07 557.47 2.32510 1.9199767E+04 1.0703706E+07 557.49 2.35000 1.9189974E+04 1.0698897E+07 557.53 2.37503 1.9159580E+04 1.0682347E+07 557.55 2.40011 1.9117138E+04 1.0659079E+07 557.57 2.42510 1.9108543E+04 1.0654963E+07 557.60 2.45013 1.9096201E+04 1.0648650E+07 557.63 2.47510 1.9042948E+04 1.0633130E+07 557.65 6.2-120 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-30 Mass And Energy Release Rates 127 In2 Cold Leg (Page 5 of 5)
| |
| Time Mass Flow Energy Flow Avg. Enthalpy (sec) (lbm/sec) (Btu/sec) (Btu/lbm) 2.50011 1.9042948E+04 1.0619918E+07 557.68 2.52510 1.9038224E+04 1.0617984E+07 557.72 2.55010 1.9011234E+04 1.0603416E+07 557.74 2.57508 1.8977430E+04 1.0585017E+07 557.77 2.60006 1.8963744E+04 1.0578049E+07 557.80 2.62512 1.8950653E+04 1.0571411E+07 557.84 2.65025 1.8927642E+04 1.0559161E+07 557.87 2.67504 1.8894421E+04 1.0541167E+07 557.90 2.70018 1.8869044E+04 1.0527674E+07 557.93 2.72514 1.8846108E+04 1.0515517E+07 557.97 2.75003 1.8827068E+04 1.0505586E+07 558.00 2.77504 1.8815133E+04 1.0499666E+07 558.04 2.80005 1.8795707E+04 1.0489482E+07 558.08 2.82511 1.8768598E+04 1.0474967E+07 558.11 2.85006 1.8741259E+04 1.0460340E+07 558.14 2.87505 1.8723005E+04 1.0450857E+07 558.18 2.90005 1.8704799E+04 1.0441382E+07 558.22 2.92505 1.8678392E+04 1.0427269E+07 558.25 2.95003 1.8650919E+04 1.0412569E+07 558.29 2.97508 1.8627102E+04 1.0399953E+07 558.32 3.00020 1.8605296E+04 1.0388476E+07 558.36 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-121
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-31 Reactor Cavity Volumes (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| COMPARTMENT NUMBER COMPARTMENT LOCATION VOLUME (ft3) 1 Break Location 164.595 2 Lower Reactor Cavity 12,000.
| |
| 3 Reactor Vessel Annulus 1.319 4 Reactor Vessel Annulus 1.938 5 Reactor Vessel Annulus 8.601 6 Reactor Vessel Annulus 8.601 7 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.825 8 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 9 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.825 10 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 11 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.205 12 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 13 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.206 14 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 15 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.825 16 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 17 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.825 18 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 19 Reactor Vessel Annulus 9.206 20 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 21 Lower Containment 60,000.
| |
| 22 Lower Containment 60,000.
| |
| 23 Lower Containment 60,000.
| |
| 24 Lower Containment 60,000.
| |
| 25 Break Location 165.206 26 Inspection Annulus 165.819 27 Inspection Annulus 165.206 28 Inspection Annulus 164.595 29 Inspection Annulus 165.206 30 Inspection Annulus 165.819 31 Inspection Annulus 165.206 32 Upper Containment 651,000.
| |
| 33 Reactor Vessel Annulus 1.404 34 Reactor Vessel Annulus 1.404 35 Reactor Vessel Annulus 1.938 36 Reactor Vessel Annulus 8.601 37 Reactor Vessel Annulus 8.601 38 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 39 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 40 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 41 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 42 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 43 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 44 Reactor Vessel Annulus 17.202 45 Reactor Vessel Annulus 0.602 46 Reactor Vessel Annulus 0.602 47 Upper Reactor Cavity 15,500.
| |
| 48 Ice Condenser 24,241.
| |
| 6.2-122 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-31 Reactor Cavity Volumes (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| COMPARTMENT NUMBER COMPARTMENT LOCATION VOLUME (ft3) 49 Ice Condenser 28,760.
| |
| 50 Ice Condenser 28,760.
| |
| 51 Ice Condenser 28,760.
| |
| 52 Ice Condenser 47,000.
| |
| 53 Pipe Annulus 150.
| |
| 54 Inspection Port 17.280 55 Inspection Port 17.280 56 Inspection Port 17.280 57 Inspection Port 17.280 58 Inspection Port 17.280 59 Inspection Port 17.280 60 Inspection Port 17.280 61 Inspection Port 17.280 62 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 63 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 64 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 65 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 66 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 67 Pipe Annulus 47.
| |
| 68 Pipe Annulus 150.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-123
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-32 Flow Path Data (Reactor Cavity) (Page 1 of 3)
| |
| Inertia Hydraulic Flow Equiv. Area Length Diameter Area Length Ratio Between Compartments k f (ft) (ft) (ft2) (ft) a/A 1 to 3 0.4 0.02 1.6 0.3 2.7 1.2 0.28 2 to 22 2.9 0.02 28. 5.8 36. 19. 0.0 3 to 34 1.0 0.02 0.7 0.4 1.2 0.7 1.0 4 to 35 0.0 0.02 3.6 0.4 0.7 3.6 1.0 5 to 36 0.0 0.02 3.3 0.4 2.6 3.3 1.0 6 to 37 0.0 0.02 3.3 0.4 2.6 3.3 1.0 7 to 9 1.0 0.02 4.9 0.4 1.0 4.1 1.0 8 to 10 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 9 to 11 1.04 0.02 4.6 0.4 1.0 3.7 0.46 10 to 12 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 11 to 13 1.04 0.02 4.8 0.4 1.0 4.0 0.46 12 to 14 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 13 to 15 1.04 0.02 4.6 0.4 1.0 3.7 0.46 14 to 16 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 15 to 17 1.04 0.02 4.9 0.4 1.0 4.1 0.5 16 to 18 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 17 to 19 1.0 0.02 4.6 0.4 1.0 3.7 0.46 18 to 20 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 19 to 4 1.0 0.02 5.4 0.4 0.5 5.4 1.0 20 to 6 0.0 0.02 5.0 0.4 2.6 5.0 1.0 21 to 22 2.0 0.02 38. 40. 1560. 38. 0.43 22 to 23 3.0 0.02 38. 40. 1560. 38. 0.47 23 to 24 2.0 0.02 38. 40. 1560. 38. 0.43 24 to 21 3.0 0.02 32. 8.0 100. 27. 0.09 25 to 7 2.8 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 26 to 9 2.8 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 27 to 11 2.8 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 28 to 13 2.8 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 29 to 15 2.8 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 30 to 17 2.8 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 31 to 19 2.8 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 33 to 3 1.0 0.02 0.7 0.4 1.2 0.7 0.99 34 to 7 1.0 0.02 3.6 0.4 1.2 3.3 0.66 35 to 7 1.0 0.02 5.4 0.4 0.5 5.4 1.0 36 to 38 0.0 0.02 5.0 0.4 2.2 5.0 1.0 37 to 8 0.0 0.02 5.0 0.4 2.6 5.0 1.0 38 to 39 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 39 to 40 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 40 to 41 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 41 to 42 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 42 to 43 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 43 to 44 0.0 0.02 6.6 0.4 2.6 6.6 1.0 44 to 5 0.0 0.02 5.0 0.4 2.6 5.0 1.0 45 to 3 1.0 0.02 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.78 46 to 3 1.0 0.02 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.78 53 to 1 0.4 0.02 7.6 0.83 5.5 6.8 0.11 54 to 1 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 55 to 25 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 56 to 26 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 2.0 0.26 6.2-124 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-32 Flow Path Data (Reactor Cavity) (Page 2 of 3)
| |
| Inertia Hydraulic Flow Equiv. Area Length Diameter Area Length Ratio Between Compartments k f (ft) (ft) (ft2) (ft) a/A 57 to 27 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 58 to 28 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 59 to 29 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 60 to 30 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 2.0 0.26 61 to 31 0.5 0.02 2.6 2.5 4.9 1.9 0.25 62 to 25 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 63 to 26 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 64 to 27 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 65 to 28 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 66 to 29 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 67 to 30 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 68 to 31 0.4 0.02 7.6 0.83 5.5 6.8 0.11 1 to 19 0.4 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 2 to 6 3.7 0.02 6.5 0.4 0.7 6.4 0.0 4 to 45 0.6 0.02 2.4 0.4 0.7 2.4 0.95 6 to 5 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 0.7 13. 1.0 7 to 38 1.0 0.02 6.0 0.4 0.3 4.7 0.23 8 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 9 to 39 9.2 0.02 6.7 0.4 0.3 4.9 0.23 10 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 11 to 40 1.0 0.02 5.5 0.4 0.2 4.5 0.17 12 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 13 to 41 9.2 0.02 6.0 0.4 0.2 4.6 0.17 14 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 15 to 42 1.0 0.02 6.0 0.4 0.3 4.7 0.23 16 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 17 to 43 9.2 0.02 6.7 0.4 0.3 4.9 0.23 18 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 19 to 44 1.0 0.02 5.5 0.4 0.2 4.5 0.17 20 to 2 3.7 0.02 6.6 0.4 1.3 6.4 0.0 21 to 48 .7837 0.0 10.36 1.0 265.875 0.0 0.096 22 to 48 .7837 0.0 10.36 1.0 265.875 0.0 0.096 23 to 48 .7837 0.0 10.36 1.0 265.875 0.0 0.096 24 to 48 .7837 0.0 10.36 1.0 265.875 0.0 0.096 25 to 3 0.4 0.02 1.6 0.3 2.7 1.2 0.28 26 to 7 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 27 to 9 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 28 to 11 0.4 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 29 to 13 0.4 0.02 3.1 0.2 1.3 1.7 0.13 30 to 15 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 31 to 17 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.2 1.1 1.7 0.12 33 to 46 2.2 0.02 3.3 0.4 0.4 3.3 0.25 34 to 46 2.2 0.02 3.3 0.4 0.4 3.3 0.25 35 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 0.7 1.5 0.0 37 to 36 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 0.7 13. 1.0 38 to 8 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 39 to 10 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-125
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-32 Flow Path Data (Reactor Cavity) (Page 3 of 3)
| |
| Inertia Hydraulic Flow Equiv. Area Length Diameter Area Length Ratio Between Compartments k f (ft) (ft) (ft2) (ft) a/A 40 to 12 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 41 to 14 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 42 to 16 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 43 to 18 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 44 to 20 0.0 0.02 13. 0.4 1.3 13. 1.0 45 to 33 0.0 0.02 3.3 0.4 0.4 3.3 0.25 48 to 49 0.0 0.1055 8.733 0.855 989.01 8.0 0.230 49 to 50 0.0 0.0592 12.278 0.855 982.47 16.0 0.239 50 to 51 0.0 0.0592 12.278 0.855 982.47 16.0 0.359 51 to 52 0.87979 0.1249 8.8558 0.855 982.47 8.0 0.359 52 to 32 1.43 0.0 2.8 1.0 2003.1 0.269 53 to 25 0.4 0.02 7.6 0.83 5.5 6.8 0.11 54 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 55 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 56 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 57 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 58 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 59 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 60 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 61 to 47 1.0 0.02 1.9 2.5 4.9 1.8 0.0 62 to 26 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 63 to 27 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 64 to 28 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 65 to 29 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 66 to 30 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 67 to 31 0.4 0.02 3.0 0.83 5.5 2.2 0.11 68 to 1 0.4 0.02 7.6 0.83 5.5 8.8 0.11 1 to 25 1.0 0.02 5.4 1.5 9.6 2.6 0.47 2 to 37 3.7 0.02 6.5 0.4 0.7 6.4 0.0 4 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 0.7 1.5 1.0 5 to 46 9.2 0.02 7.8 2.0 0.5 18. 1.0 7 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 9 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 11 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 13 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 15 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 17 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 19 to 47 1.1 0.02 3.0 0.4 1.4 2.9 0.0 21 to 47 3.8 0.02 5.8 5.1 26. 4.0 0.04 22 to 47 3.8 0.02 9.1 12. 74. 4.2 0.10 23 to 47 3.8 0.02 8.3 11. 62. 4.0 0.08 24 to 47 3.9 0.02 6.3 5.5 32. 4.0 0.04 25 to 26 1.0 0.02 5.3 1.4 9.1 2.3 0.44 26 to 27 1.0 0.02 5.3 1.4 9.1 2.6 0.44 27 to 28 1.0 0.02 5.4 1.5 9.6 2.6 0.47 28 to 29 1.0 0.02 5.4 1.5 9.6 2.6 0.47 29 to 30 1.0 0.02 5.3 1.4 9.1 2.6 0.44 30 to 31 1.0 0.02 5.3 1.4 9.1 2.6 0.44 31 to 1 1.0 0.02 5.4 1.5 9.6 2.6 0.47 33 to 19 1.0 0.02 3.6 0.4 1.2 3.3 0.61 35 to 46 0.6 0.02 2.4 0.4 0.7 2.4 0.95 36 to 46 9.2 0.02 7.8 2.0 0.5 18. 0.95 45 to 34 0.0 0.02 3.3 0.4 0.4 3.3 0.25 53 to 21 1.0 0.02 7.2 17. 11.0 8.8 0.0 62 to 21 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.5 11.0 2.1 0.0 63 to 22 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.5 11.0 2.1 0.0 64 to 22 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.7 11.0 2.1 0.0 65 to 23 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.7 11.0 2.1 0.0 66 to 23 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.5 11.0 2.1 0.0 67 to 24 1.0 0.02 2.5 1.5 11.0 2.1 0.0 68 to 24 1.0 0.02 7.2 1.7 11.0 6.8 0.0 6.2-126 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-33 Containment Data (Eccs Analysis)
| |
| (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| I. Conservatively High Estimate of Containment Net Free Volume Containment Area Volume (ft3)
| |
| Upper Compartment 651,000 Lower Compartment 271,400 Ice Condenser 169,400 Dead-Ended Compartments (includes all accumulator rooms, 129,900 both fan compartments, instrument room pipe tunnel)
| |
| II. Initial Conditions A. Containment Pressure 15.0 psia B. Lowest Operational Containment Temperature for the Upper, 85°F Lower, and Dead-Ended Compartments 100°F C. Highest Refueling Water Storage Tank Temperature 100°F D. Lowest Temperature Outside Containment 5°F E. Highest Initial Spray Temperature 100°F F. Lowest Annulus Temperature 40°F III. Structural Heat Sinks**
| |
| A. For Each Surface
| |
| : 1. Description of Surface
| |
| : 2. Conservatively High Estimate of Area Exposed to See Tables 6.2.1-34 through Containment Atmosphere 6.2.1-36
| |
| : 3. Location in Containment by Compartment B. For Each Separate Layer of Each Surface
| |
| : 1. Material
| |
| : 2. Conservatively Large Estimate of Layer Thickness See Tables 6.2.1-34 through 6.2.1-36
| |
| : 3. Conservatively High Value of Material Conductivity See Tables 6.2.1-34 through 6.2.1-36
| |
| : 4. Conservatively High Value of Volumetric Heat Capacity See Tables 6.2.1-34 through 6.2.1-36 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-127
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-33 Containment Data (Eccs Analysis) (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| IV. Spray System A. Runout Flow for a Spray Pump*** (Containment Spray) 7700 gpm B. Number of Spray Pumps Operating with No Diesel Failure 2/Unit C. Number of Spray Pumps Operating with One Diesel Failure 1/Unit D. Assumed Post Accident Initiation of Spray System 25 sec V. Deck Fan A. Fastest Post Accident Initiation of Deck Fans 10 min B. Conservatively High Flow Rate Per Fan 42,000 cfm VI. Conservatively Low Hydrogen Skimmer System100 cfm/each Flow Rate
| |
| ** Structural heat sinks should also account for any surfaces neglected in containment integrity analysis.
| |
| *** Runout flow is for a break immediately downstream of the pump. In that event, the spray water will not enter the containment.
| |
| 6.2-128 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-34 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Containment - Upper Compartment Heat Thickness Volume Transfer and Thermal Heat Area Material Conductivity Capacity Structure (ft2) (as noted) (Btu/ft-hr-°F) (Btu/ft3-°F)
| |
| Operating Deck 4,452 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 7,749 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 672 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 11,445 6.3 mils coating 0.087 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 4,032 0.26 in. stainless steel 9.87 59.22 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 798 15.7 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Containment Shell 22,890 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.46 in. carbon steel 27.3 30.24 18,375 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.58 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 2,100 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 1.51 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 Miscellaneous Steel 4,095 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.26 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 3,559 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 27.3 59.22 3,539 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.72 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 273 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 1.57 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-129
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-35 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Containment - Upper Compartment (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| Heat Thickness Volume Transfer and Thermal Heat Area Material Conductivity Capacity Structure (ft2) (as noted) (Btu/ft-hr-°F) (Btu/ft3-°F)
| |
| Operating Deck 4,452 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 7,749 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 672 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 11,445 6.3 mils coating 0.087 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 4,032 0.26 in. stainless steel 9.87 59.22 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 798 15.7 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Containment Shell 22,890 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.46 in. carbon steel 27.3 30.24 18,375 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.58 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 2,100 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 1.51 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 Miscellaneous Steel 4,095 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.26 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 3,559 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 27.3 59.22 3,539 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 0.72 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.22 273 7.8 mils coating 0.21 29.8 1.57 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 Operating Deck 7,507 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,971 1.6 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,131 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 789 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.84 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,646 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 210 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 6.2-130 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-35 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Containment - Upper Compartment (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| Heat Thickness Volume Transfer and Thermal Heat Area Material Conductivity Capacity Structure (ft2) (as noted) (Btu/ft-hr-°F) (Btu/ft3-°F)
| |
| Crane Wall 14,752 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 3,570 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Containment Floor 567 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 7,612 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Interior Concrete 3,780 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 567 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,992 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,384 0.26 in. stainless 9.8 59.2 steel 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 2,373 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 1,480 6.3 mils coating 0.087 29.8 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Miscellaneous Steel 12,915 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 0.53 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 7,560 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 0.78 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 5,250 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.1 carbon steel 27.3 59.2 2,625 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.45 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 1,575 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.7 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-131
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-36 Major Characteristics Of Structural Heat Sinks Inside Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Containment - Lower Compartment Heat Thickness and Material Thermal Volume Heat Transfer (as noted) Conductivity (Btu/ft- Capacity Structure Area (ft2) hr-°F) (Btu/ft3-°F)
| |
| Containment Shell 3,045 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 0.78 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 4,305 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.1 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 4,305 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.25 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 3,780 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.37 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 4,305 7.8 mils coating 0.22 14.7 1.51 in. carbon steel 27.3 59.2 Crane Wall 7,255 1.6 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 3,801 6.3 mils coating 0.87 14.7 1.58 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Containment Floor 4,809 6.3 mils coating 0.087 14.7 2.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 Interior Concrete 9,870 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 3,948 6.3 mils coating 0.087 14.7 1.1 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 5,376 1.58 ft concrete 0.84 30.24 6.2-132 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-37 Maximum Reverse Pressure Differential Pressure Analysis Base Case Westinghouse ECCS structural heat transfer model Sprays at runout flow Offsite power available spray start time Minimum containment temperature Dead-ended volume is swept Max. reverse differential pressure = 0.65 psi Case Variable Change in Max. dP (psi) 1 Ice condenser flow through the drains acts as 50% thermal efficient +0.2 spray 2 Same as Case 1, except 100% thermal efficiency +0.4 3 Maximum containment temperature -0.2 4 Heat transfer coefficient to sump equals 5 times Hmax <0.1 5 Same as Case 2, except drain flow rate times 1.5 +0.6 6 Combination of Cases 2 and 4 +0.4 7 1 bay of ice condenser doors remains open -0.65 8 Same as Case 6 except Equation (3) written as +0.55 H = Hstag + [Hmax - Hstag] e-.025 [t-tp]
| |
| 9 Same as Case 6 except 5 times upper to lower resistance +2.0 10 RWST temperature = 105°F +0.2 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-133
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-38 Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow vs. Time vs. Sump Temperature (Page 1 of 3)
| |
| Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow Time (sec) Sump Temp. (°F) (lb/sec) 13.1 190.3 -1.74 13.8 190.6 -1.63 14.4 190.7 -1.76 15.0 190.9 -1.54 15.4 191.1 -1.37 15.9 191.2 -1.23 16.3 191.3 -.13 16.6 191.4 -.09 17.0 191.5 -.09 17.4 191.6 -.08 17.8 191.7 -.08 18.2 191.8 -.07 18.6 191.9 -.07 19.0 192.0 -.07 19.3 192.1 -.07 19.7 192.2 -.06 20.0 192.3 -1.04 20.3 192.4 -.93 20.9 192.5 -1.17 21.5 192.7 -1.43 21.8 192.8 -2.24 22.4 192.9 -2.95 23.0 193.1 -2.85 23.6 193.2 -2.64 23.9 193.3 -2.53 24.5 193.4 -2.34 25.1 193.8 -2.17 25.4 194.0 -2.05 25.7 194.1 -1.94 6.2-134 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.1-38 Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow vs. Time vs. Sump Temperature (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 3)
| |
| Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow Time (sec) Sump Temp. (°F) (lb/sec) 26.0 194.2 -1.85 26.6 194.6 -1.69 27.2 194.8 -1.58 27.5 194.9 -1.53 28.0 195.2 -1.45 29.5 195.6 -1.40 30.1 195.8 -1.42 30.7 196.0 -1.44 31.3 196.2 -1.45 31.9 196.3 -1.45 32.5 196.4 -1.43 33.1 196.5 -1.40 33.7 196.6 -1.36 34.3 196.8 -1.31 34.9 196.9 -1.26 35.5 196.9 -1.20 36.0 197.0 -1.115 36.9 197.2 -0.96 37.9 197.3 -0.80 38.9 197.4 -0.63 40.1 197.4 -0.44 41.3 197.5 -0.29 42.2 197.5 -0.20 44.0 197.4 -.09 44.9 197.3 -0.4 45.4 197.3 .12 46.7 197.2 .19 47.6 197.0 .20 48.9 196.9 .19 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-135
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-38 Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow vs. Time vs. Sump Temperature (Continued)
| |
| (Page 3 of 3)
| |
| Ice Condenser Steam Exit Flow Time (sec) Sump Temp. (°F) (lb/sec) 49.8 196.7 .17 51.2 196.5 .12 52.3 196.4 .07 53.6 196.1 .01 54.4 196.0 -.01 55.2 195.9 -.03 56.2 195.7 -.05 57.1 195.5 -.07 58.0 195.4 -.10 59.0 195.2 -.17 59.9 195.0 -.14 60.9 194.9 -.15 61.6 194.7 -.17 62.8 194.5 -.18 63.7 194.3 -.20 64.7 194.2 -.22 65.6 194.0 -.24 66.6 193.8 -.31 67.5 193.6 -.41 68.4 193.5 -.60 69.4 193.3 .20 70.3 193.2 .63 71.3 193.0 .84 72.2 192.9 1.05 73.2 192.7 1.25 74.1 192.6 1.39 75.1 192.5 1.54 76.0 192.4 1.66 77.0 192.3 1.78 6.2-136 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 t
| |
| Table 6.2.1-39 Mass and Energy Release Rates For Specified Steam Line Breaks I. Run 1-1.4 ft² Break, 102% Power, AFT Runout Mass Flow Rate, m Energy Flow Rate, e Time (sec) (1bm/sec) (Btu/sec) 0.1000E-01 0.1292E+05 0.1536E+08 0.2000E+00 0.1289E+05 0.1533E+08 0.2010E+00 0.1225E+08 0.1457E+08 0.1000E+01 0.1176E+05 0.1400E+08 0.2000E+01 0.1116E+05 0.1331E+08 0.3000E+01 0.1064E+05 0.1271E+08 0.4000E+01 0.1021E+05 0.1221E+08 0.5000E+01 0.9833E+04 0.1177E+08 0.6000E+01 0.9504E+04 0.1135E+08 0.7000E+01 0.9209E+04 0.1104E+08 0.8000E+01 0.8868E+04 0.1064E+08 0.8635E+01 8.8746E+04 0.1050E+08 0.8700E+01 0.2169E+04 0.2603E+07 0.9000E+01 0.2148E+04 0.2578E+07 0.1000E+02 0.2077E+04 0.2494E+07 0.1100E+02 0.2018E+04 0.2424E+07 0.1200E+02 0.1949E+04 0.2343+07 0.1300E+02 0.1881E+04 0.2261E+07 0.1400E+02 0.1815E+04 0.2183E+07 0.1500E+02 0.1753E+04 0.2109E+07 0.1750E+02 0.1625E+04 0.1957E+07 0.2000E+02 0.1510E+04 0.1818E+07 0.2500E+02 0.1321E+04 0.1590E+07 0.3000E+02 0.1184E+04 0.1426E+07 0.3500E+02 0.1082E+04 0.1301E+07 0.4000E+02 0.1004E+04 0.1209E+07 0.4500E+02 0.9470E+03 0.1140E+07 0.5000E+02 0.9000E+03 0.1083E+07 06.00E+02 0.8290E+03 0.9973E+06 0.7000E+02 0.7820E+03 0.9400E+06 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-137
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-39 Mass and Energy Release Rates For Specified Steam Line Breaks I. Run 1-1.4 ft² Break, 102% Power, AFT Runout (Continued)
| |
| Mass Flow Rate, m Energy Flow Rate, e Time (sec) (1bm/sec) (Btu/sec) 0.9000E+02 0.7130E+03 0.8563E+06 0.1000E+03 0.6870E+03 0.8251E+06 0.1200E+03 0.6440E+03 0.7728E+06 0.1600E+03 0.5790E+03 0.6942E+06 0.1800E+03 0.5500E+03 0.6589E+06 0.2500E+03 0.4710E+03 0.5628E+06 0.3000E+03 0.4300E+03 0.5134E+06 0.4500E+03 0.3030E+03 0.3600E+06 0.6000E+03 0.2710E+03 0.3214E+06 0.6660E+03 0. 0.
| |
| 0.1000E-01 0.1398E+04 0.1658E+07 0.1500E+01 0.1389E+04 0.1648E+07 0.2500E+01 0.1379E+04 0.1636E+07 0.3500E+01 0.1374E+04 0.1630E+07 0.5500D+01 0.1356E+04 0.1610E+07 0.7500E+01 0.1365E+04 0.1620E+07 0.9500E+01 0.1371E+04 0.1627E+07 0.1150E+02 0.1371E+04 0.1628E+07 0.1450E+02 0.1354E+04 0.1608E+07 0.1750E+02 0.1268E+04 0.1511E+07 0.2050E+02 0.1176E+04 0.1404E+07 0.3050E+02 0.9751E+03 0.1169E+07 0.4050E+02 0.8537E+03 0.1026E+07 0.6050E+02 0.7004E+03 0.8430E+06 0.8050E+02 0.6120E+03 0.7371E+06 0.1005E+03 0.5547E+03 0.6682E+06 0.1505E+03 0.4758E+03 0.5730E+06 0.2005E+03 0.4270E+03 0.5141E+06 0.2505E+03 0.3886E+03 0.4675E+06 0.3005E+03 0.3450E+03 0.4257E+06 6.2-138 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-39 Mass and Energy Release Rates For Specified Steam Line Breaks I. Run 1-1.4 ft² Break, 102% Power, AFT Runout (Continued)
| |
| Mass Flow Rate, m Energy Flow Rate, e Time (sec) (1bm/sec) (Btu/sec) 0.3505E+03 0.3260E+03 0.3918E+06 0.4005E+03 0.3027E+03 0.3635E+06 0.4505E+03 0.2821E+03 0.3385E+06 0.5005E+03 0.2633E+03 0.3158E+06 0.5505E+03 0.2462E+03 0.2951E+06 0.5825E+03 0.2381E+03 0.2852E+06 0.6005E+03 0.2452E+03 0.2939E+06 0.6265E+03 0.2780E+03 0.3338E+06 0.6285E+03 0.2990E+03 0.3588E+06 0.6305E+03 0.2825E+03 0.3390E+06 0.6485E+03 0.2730E+03 0.3275E+06 0.7005E+03 0.2652E+03 0.3180E+06 0.7505E+03 0.2607E+03 0.3127E+06 0.8005E+03 0.2609E+03 0.3128E+06 0.8285E+03 0.2614E+03 0.3135E+06 0.8645E+03 0.226E+03 0.3193E+06 0.9005E+03 0.2628E+03 0.3151E+06 0.9505E+03 0.2620E+03 0.3142E+06 0.1070E+04 0.2616E+03 0.3137E+06 0.1071E+04 0. 0.
| |
| 0.1000E-01 0.8256E+03 0.9790E+06 0.1500E+01 0.8221E+03 0.9750E+06 0.2500E+01 0.8182E+03 0.9705E+06 0.5500E+01 0.8102E+03 0.9616E+06 0.7500E+01 0.8039E+03 0.9543E+06 0.9500E+01 0.8097E+03 0.9609E+06 0.1250E+02 0.8194E+03 0.9721E+06 0.1550E+02 0.8231E+03 0.9766E+06 0.1850E+02 0.8158E+03 0.9683E+06 0.2050E+02 0.8104E+03 0.9626E+06 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-139
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-39 Mass and Energy Release Rates For Specified Steam Line Breaks I. Run 1-1.4 ft² Break, 102% Power, AFT Runout (Continued)
| |
| Mass Flow Rate, m Energy Flow Rate, e Time (sec) (1bm/sec) (Btu/sec) 0.3050E+02 0.6939E+03 0.8281E+06 0.4050E+02 0.6281E+03 0.7515E+06 0.5050E+02 0.5785E+03 0.6934E+06 0.1005E+03 0.4437E+03 0.5338E+06 0.1505E+03 0.3844E+03 0.4628E+06 0.2005E+03 0.3500E+03 0.4215E+06 0.2505E+03 0.3236E+03 0.3898E+06 0.3005E+03 0.2999E+03 0.3611E+06 0.3505E+03 0.2783E+03 0.3352E+06 0.4005E+03 0.2595E+03 0.3125E+06 0.4505E+03 0.2432E+03 0.2927E+06 0.5005E+03 0.2290E+03 0.2756E+06 0.5505E+03 0.2160E+03 0.2598E+06 0.6005E+03 0.2041E+03 0.2454E+06 0.6465E+03 0.2027E+03 0.2437E+06 0.6505E+03 0.2011E+03 0.2418E+06 0.1422E+04 0.2065E+03 0.2484E+06 0.1423E+04 0. 0.
| |
| 6.2-140 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-40 Steam Line Break Cases For Core Integrity Boric Acid Concentration Case Type of Break (ppm) 1 Hypothetical with offsite power, downstream of the flow restrictor 0 2 Hypothetical without offsite power, downstream of the flow 0 restrictor 3 Credible - Uniform 0 4 Credible - Nonuniform 0 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-141
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-41 Line Break(1) Descriptions For Mass And Energy Releases 102% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 102% Power - Feed Control Valve (FCV) Failure 102% Power - No Failure 102% Power - Feedwater Isolation Valve (FWIV) Failure 0% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 0% Power - Feed Control Valve (FCV) Failure 0% Power - No Failure 0% Power - Feedwater Isolation Valve (FWIV) Failure Notes:
| |
| (1) For 1.4 ft2 break 6.2-142 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-42 Small Break Descriptions For Mass And Energy Break Size (ft2) Description 0.944 30% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 0.6 30% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 0.35 30% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 0.1 30% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure 0.86 102% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection Failure CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-143
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-43 Large Break Analysis - Associated Times Maximum Lower Compartment Time, Tmax Case Temperature (°F) (sec) 1.4 ft2, 102% Power - AFW Pump Runout 289.484 3.11 Protection Failure 1.4 ft2, 102% Power - FCV Failure 289.483 3.11 1.4 ft2, 102% Power - FWIV Failure 289.483 3.11 1.4 ft2, 102% Power - MSIV Failure 286.96 3.31 1.4 ft2, 0% Power - AFW Pump Runout Protection 287.37 3.16 Failure 1.4 ft2, 0% Power - FCV Failure 287.30 3.21 1.4 ft2, 0% Power - FWIV Failure 287.28 3.21 1.4 ft2, 0% Power - MSIV Failure 288.28 2.51 6.2-144 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Table 6.2.1-44 Small Break Analysis - Small Split - Associated Times Maximum Lower 1
| |
| Case Compartment Time, Tmax (ft2) Temperature (°F) (sec) 0.86 325.34 83.28 0.944 325.12 80.46 0.6 325.37 134.12 0.35 324.86 262.92 0.1 317.74 646.77 1 All with AFW pump runout protection failure and 30% power, except that 0.86 ft2 break is at 102% power.
| |
| CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 6.2-145
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6.2-146 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-1 Pressure vs. Time Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-147
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-2 Temperature VS. Time 6.2.1-148 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-149 WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-3 Active and Inactive Sump Temperature Transients
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-4 Ice Melt Transient 6.2.1-150 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-4a Ice Mass vs. Pressure Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-151
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-5 Plan at Equiment Rooms Elevation 6.2.1-152 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-6 Containment Section View Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-153
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-7 Plan View at Ice Condenser Elevation Ice Condenser Compartments 6.2.1-154 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-8 Layout of Containment Shell Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-155
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-9 TMD Code Network 6.2.1-156 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-10 Upper and Lower Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 1) Having a DEHL Break Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-157
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-11 Upper and Lower Compartment Pressure Transient for Worst Case Break Compartment (Element 1) Having a DECL Break.
| |
| 6.2.1-158 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-12 Illustration of Choked Flow Characteristics Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-159
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-13 Sensitivity of Peak Pressure to Air Comrression Ratio 6.2.1-160 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-14 Steam Concentration in a Vertical Distribution Channel Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-161
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.1-162 Containment Functional Design Figure 6.2.1-15 Peak Comnression Pressure Versus Compression Ratio WBNP-55
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-163 WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-16 Peak Compartment Pressure versus Blowdown Rate
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-17 Sensitivity of Peak Compression Pressure to Deck Bypass 6.2.1-164 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-18 Pressure Increase versus Deck Area from Deck Leakage Tests Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-165
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-19 Energy Release at Time of Compression Peak Pressure From Full-Scale Section Tests with 1-Foot Diameter Baskets 6.2.1-166 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-20 Pressure Increase versus Deck Area from Deck Leakage Tests Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-167
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-21 Coolant Temperature at Core Inlet 6.2.1-168 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-22 Core Reflooding Rate - Vin Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-169
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-23 Carryover Fraction - Fout 6.2.1-170 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-24 Fraction of Flow through Broken Loop.
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-171
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.1-172 Containment Functional Design Figure 6.2.1-25 Post-Blowdown Downcomer and Core Water Height.
| |
| WBNP-55
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-26 Steam Generator Heat Content.
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-173
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-27 Containment Model Schematic.
| |
| 6.2.1-174 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-28 Reactor Cavity TMD Network.
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-175
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.1-29 Reactor Vessel Annulus 6.2.1-176 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-30 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-177
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-31 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-178 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-32 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-179
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-33 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-180 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-34 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-181
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-35 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-182 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-36 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-183
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-37 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-184 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-38 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-185
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-39 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-186 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-40 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-187
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-41 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-188 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-42 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-189
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-43 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-190 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-44 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-191
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-45 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-192 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-46 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-193
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-47 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-194 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-48 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-195
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-49 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-196 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-50 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-197
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-51 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-198 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-52 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-199
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-53 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-200 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-54 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity AnalysIS)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-201
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-55 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-202 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-56 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-203
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-57 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-204 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-58 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-205
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-59 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-206 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-60 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-207
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6.2.1-208 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-61 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-209
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-62 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-210 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-63 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-211
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-64 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-212 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-65 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-213
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-66 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-214 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-67 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break (Reactor Cavity Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-215
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-68 127 Square Inch Cold Leg Break Reactor Cavity Analysis) 6.2.1-216 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-69 Compartment Temperature 1.4ft2/Loop, 102% Power FCV Failure Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-217
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-70 Lower Compartment Pressure 1.4 Ft2 Loop, 102% Power FCV Failure 6.2.1-218 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-71 Compartment Temperature 0.35 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Runout Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-219
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-72 Lower Compartment Pressure 0.35 Ft2 Split, 30% Power Afw Runout 6.2.1-220 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-73 Compartment Temperature 0.6 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Runout Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-221
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-74 Lower Compartment Pressure 0.6 Ft2 Split, 30% Power AFW Fail 6.2.1-222 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-75 Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-223
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-76 6.2.1-224 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-77 Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-225
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-78 6.2.1-226 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-79 Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-227
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-69 Figure 6.2.1-80 6.2.1-228 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-27 Figure 6.2.1-81 Steam Generator Enclosure Nodalization Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-229
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.1-230 Containment Functional Design WBNP-27 Figure 6.2.1-82 Flow Paths For TMD Steam Generator Enclosure Short-term Pressure Analysis
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-83 Pressure Transient Between Break Element And Upper Compartment (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-231
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-84 Differential Pressure Transient Across The Steam Generator Vessel (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis) 6.2.1-232 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-85 Differential Pressure Transient Cross The Steam Generator Vessel (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-233
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-86 Pressure Versus Time For The Break Element (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis) 6.2.1-234 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.1-86a Upper Compartment Pressure Versus Time (Steam Generator Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-235
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-87 Nodalization Pressure Enclosure Analysis 6.2.1-236 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-88 Pressure Transient Between Break Element And Upper Compartment (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-237
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-89 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis) 6.2.1-238 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-90 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-239
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-91 Pressure Differential Across The Pressurizer Vessel (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis) 6.2.1-240 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.1-92 Pressure Versus Time For The Break Element (Pressurizer Enclosure Analysis)
| |
| Containment Functional Design 6.2.1-241
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6.2.1-242 Containment Functional Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2.2 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS Adequate containment heat removal capability for the ice condenser reactor containment is provided by the ice condenser (Section 6.7), the air return fan system (Section 6.8), and two separae containment heat removal spray systems whose components operate in the sequential modes described in Section 6.2.2.2. One of these heat removal spray systems is the containment spray system, and the second is the residual heat removal spray system, which is a portion of the residual heat removal system (Section 6.3).
| |
| Minimum engineered safety feature performance of the containment heat removal systems is achieved with the following:
| |
| (1) Ice condenser (Section 6.7)
| |
| (2) One train of the air return fan system (3) One train of the containment spray system (4) One train of the residual heat removal spray system (not required for steam or feed line break)
| |
| Each spray system consists of two trains of redundant equipment per reactor unit.
| |
| There are four spray headers per unit. Two headers are supplied from separate trains of the containment spray system; the other two are supplied by separate trains of the RHR spray system. Each individual train consists of a pump, a heat exchanger, appropriate control valves, required piping, and a header with nozzles located in the upper compartment of the containment with flow directed to obtain full coverage of the containment upper volume during an emergency. The systems use borated water supplied from the refueling water storage tank and/or the recirculation sump.
| |
| 6.2.2.1 Design Bases The primary design basis for the containment heat removal spray systems is to spray cool water into the containment atmosphere when appropriate in the event of a loss-of-coolant accident or secondary side break and thereby ensure that the containment pressure cannot exceed the containment shell maximum internal pressure of 15.0 psig at 250°F, which corresponds to the code design internal pressure of 13.5 psig at 250°F (see Section 3.8.2). This protection is afforded for all pipe break sizes up to and including the hypothetical instantaneous circumferential rupture of the reactor coolant loop resulting in unobstructed flow from both pipe ends. After the ice has melted, the containment spray system and the residual heat removal spray system become the sole systems for removing energy directly from the containment. The containment heat removal systems are designed to provide a means of removing containment heat without loss of functional performance in the post-accident containment environment and operate without benefit of maintenance for the duration of time to restore and maintain containment conditions at atmospheric pressure. Although the water in the core after a loss-of-coolant accident is quickly subcooled by the emergency core cooling system (Section 6.3), the design of heat removal capability of each CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 containment heat removal system is based on the conservative assumption that the core residual heat is released to the containment as steam which eventually melts all ice in the ice condenser.
| |
| The containment spray system provides two redundant heat removal trains. The system is designed such that both trains are automatically started by high-high containment pressure signal. The signal actuates, as required, all controls for positioning all valves to their operating position and starts the pumps. The operator can also manually actuate the entire system from the control room. Either of the two trains containing a pump, heat exchanger, and associated valving and spray headers is independently capable of delivering a minimum flowrate of 4,000 gpm.
| |
| The containment heat removal spray systems are designed to withstand the design basis earthquake and the operational basis earthquake without loss of function. They satisfy the TVA Class B Mechanical Requirements. The containment heat removal spray systems maintain their integrity and do not suffer loss of ability to perform their minimum required function due to normal operation, faults of moderate frequency, infrequent faults, and limiting faults.
| |
| Sufficient redundancy for all supporting systems necessary for minimum operational requirements of the containment heat removal spray systems is provided and complies with the single failure criteria for engineered safety features. Separate divisions on essential raw cooling water supply, power equipment heat exchangers, pumps, valves, and instrumentation are provided in order to have two completely separated trains.
| |
| The system is provided with overpressure protection from excessive pressures that could otherwise result from temperature changes, interconnection with other systems operating at higher pressures, or other means.
| |
| Those portions of the containment heat removal spray systems located outside of the containment which are designed to circulate, during post-accident conditions, radioactively contaminated water collected in the containment meet the following requirements:
| |
| (1) Shielding within guidelines of 10CFR20 and 10CFR100.
| |
| (2) Collection of discharges from pressure relieving devices.
| |
| (3) Remote means for isolating any sections under anticipated malfunction or failure conditions.
| |
| (4) Means to detect and control radioactivity leakage into the environs to limits consistent with guidelines set forth in 10CFR20 and 10CFR100.
| |
| During accident conditions, cooling of the containment spaces is provided by the ice condenser system, containment heat removal spray systems, and the air return system. In addition, during non-LOCA accidents, the lower compartment cooler (LCC) fans are utilized to recirculate air throughout the lower containment spaces to prevent hot pockets from developing. The LCC units operate continuously throughout all 6.2.2-2 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 accidents which do not initiate a containment Phase B isolation signal, as long as the cooling coils are intact and the ERCW supply to them is available. During or after a LOCA, the LCC units, including their fans, are not required to be operable. However, after a MSLB, at least two of the four LCC fans are started manually a minimum of 1-1/2 hours and a maximum of 4 hours after the MSLB to recirculate air throughout the lower containment spaces.
| |
| 6.2.2.2 System Design The containment spray systems consist of two separate trains of equal capacity with each train independently capable of meeting system requirements. This system can be supplemented with two residual heat removal system pumps and two residual heat exchangers in parallel, with associated piping, valves and individual spray headers in the upper containment volume. Each train includes a pump, heat exchanger, ring header with nozzles, isolation valves and associated piping, and instrumentation and controls. Partial flow from an RHR system pump through its associated heat exchanger can be used to supplement each train. Independent electrical power supplies are provided for equipment in each containment spray train. In addition each train is provided with electrical power from separate emergency diesel generators in the event of a loss of offsite electrical power. During normal operation, all of the equipment is idle and the associated isolation valves are closed. Upon system activation during a LOCA or other high energy line break, adequate containment cooling is provided by the containment spray systems whose components operate in sequential modes. These modes are: 1) spraying a portion of the contents of the refueling water storage tank into the containment atmosphere using the containment spray pumps; 2) after the refueling water storage tank has been drained, but while there is still ice remaining in the ice condenser, recirculation of water from the containment sump through the containment spray pumps, through the containment spray heat exchangers, and back to the containment (This spray is useful in reducing sump water temperatures.); 3) diversion of a portion of the recirculation flow from the residual heat removal system to additional spray headers. RHR spray operation is initiated manually by the operator only if the emergency core cooling system and containment spray system are both operating in the recirculation mode. If switchover to recirculation occurs prior to 1 hour after initiation of the LOCA, RHR spray operation can be commenced 1 hour after initiation of the LOCA. If switchover to recirculation occurs later than 1 hour after initiation of the LOCA, RHR spray operation can be commenced after completion of the switchover procedure.
| |
| The spray water from the containment and RHR spray systems returns from the upper compartment to the lower compartment through two 14 inch drains in the bottom of the refueling canal. The curbing around the personnel access door and the equipment access hatch on the operating deck directs spray water flow towards the refueling canal. The air-water mixture entering the air return fans will be rerouted inside the polar crane wall through the accumulator rooms utilizing curbing, the floor hatch cover and floor drainage system.
| |
| The flow diagram for this system is presented in Figure 6.2.2-1.
| |
| CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Component Description Pumps The containment spray system flow is provided by two centrifugal type pumps driven by electric motors. The motors, which can be powered either normally or from an emergency source are direct coupled and non-overloading to the end of the pump curve. The design head of the containment spray pump is sufficient to ensure rated capacity with a minimum level in the refueling water storage tank or the containment sump when pumping against a head equivalent to the sum of the maximum pressure of the containment post LOCA/HELB, the elevational head between the pump discharge and the uppermost spray nozzles, and the equipment and piping friction losses. Each pump is rated for 4000 gpm flow at a design head of 435 ft. See Table 6.2.2-1 for additional design parameters and Figure 6.2.2-2 for characteristic curves.
| |
| The residual heat removal pumps which also provide flow to the containment heat removal spray system are described in Section 5.5.7.2.1 and Table 5.5-8.
| |
| Each residual heat removal pump provides 2000 gpm for upper containment spray.
| |
| Each containment spray pump is powered by a horizontal squirrel cage induction motor. Pump motor parameters are presented in Table 6.2.2-1.
| |
| Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH)
| |
| The plant and piping layout of the containment spray system ensures that the pump NPSH requirements are met at maximum runout conditions with the containment spray pumps taking suction from either the refueling water storage tank or the containment sump. The NPSH available from the containment sump is calculated using the maximum credible sump water temperature (190°F) with no credit taken for containment overpressure or height of water in the containment sump.
| |
| Heat Exchangers The containment spray heat exchangers are the vertical counter flow U-tube type with tubes welded to the tube sheet. Borated water from either the refueling water storage tank or the containment sump circulates through the tube side. Design parameters are presented in Table 6.2.2-2.
| |
| Piping All containment heat removal spray system piping in contact with borated water is austenitic stainless steel. All piping joints are welded except for the flanged connection at the pump.
| |
| Spray Nozzles and Ring Headers Each containment spray ring header provides 4000 gpm minimum and contains 263 hollow cone ramp bottom nozzles, each of which is capable of a design flow of 15.2 gpm with a 40 psi differential pressure. These nozzles have an approximately 3/8-inch diameter spray orifice and are not subject to clogging by particles less than 1/4 inch in 6.2.2-4 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 maximum dimension. The nozzles produce a mean drop size of approximately 700 microns in diameter at rated system conditions. The spray solution is completely stable and soluble at all temperatures of interest in the containment and, therefore, does not precipitate or otherwise interfere with nozzle performance. Each nozzle header is independently oriented to maximize coverage of the containment volume inside the crane wall. This arrangement prohibits any flow into the ice condenser.
| |
| The residual heat removal spray ring headers contain 147 nozzles per header and deliver 2000 gpm per header. They have the same design characteristics as the headers in the containment spray system.
| |
| Refueling Water Storage Tank During the injection phase immediately following a LOCA or HELB, the containment spray is supplied from the refueling water storage tank.
| |
| Recirculation Sump The recirculation sump is described in Section 6.3.2.2 under the discussion of the recirculation mode.
| |
| Material Compatibility All parts of the containment spray system in contact with borated water are austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion resistant material.
| |
| 6.2.2.3 Design Evaluation Performance of the containment heat removal system is evaluated through analyses of the design basis accident and various other cases described in Chapter 15 and Section 6.2.1. The analyses were performed using the LOTIC code and show that the containment heat removal systems are capable of keeping the containment pressure below the containment maximum internal pressure of 15 psig, which corresponds to the code design internal pressure of 13.5 psig at 250°F (see Section 3.8.2) even when it is assumed that the minimum engineered safety features are operating. Section 6.2.1 presents a description of the analytical methods and models which were used along with verification of pertinent items from Waltz Mill tests, and curves showing the calculated performance of important variables following the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident.
| |
| The design basis accident results in a required containment spray flow rate of 4000 gpm using 85°F constant temperature essential raw cooling water for the heat exchangers.
| |
| The containment spray systems provide two full-capacity heat removal systems for the containment, each of which is sized as described in Section 6.2.2.1 to remove heat at a rate which precludes an increase of the containment maximum internal pressure above 15.0 psig, which corresponds to the code design internal pressure of 13.5 psig at 250°F (see Section 3.8.2). All spray headers and spray nozzles are located inside the containment in the upper compartment and can withstand, without loss of function CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 or maintenance, the post-accident containment environment. The remainder of the systems, with the exception of the refueling water storage tanks, which includes all active components, are located in the Auxiliary Building and, therefore, are not affected by wind, tornado, or snow and ice conditions.
| |
| The design is based on the spray water being raised to the saturation temperature of the containment in falling through the steam-air mixture within the building. The minimum fall path of the droplets is approximately 75 ft from the spray ring headers to the operating deck. The actual fall path is longer due to the trajectory of the droplets sprayed out from the ring header nozzles. Figures 6.2.2-3 through 6.2.2-6 depict the containment spray coverage for the containment spray system.
| |
| Except for the refueling water storage tank water supplied by the safety injection system, the containment spray system initially operates independently of other engineered safety features. For extended operation in the recirculation mode, water is supplied to the containment RHR spray headers through the residual heat removal pumps and residual heat removal exchangers. One containment spray system train, supplemented by one RHR spray train, when required, provides adequate heat removal capability to limit containment pressure below design (see Section 6.2.1.3).
| |
| RHR spray is required only after switchover to the recirculation mode and no earlier than 1 hour after initiation of the LOCA. At this time one RHR pump can provide sufficient RHR spray as well as adequate core flow via the high head (one centrifugal charging and one safety injection) pumps. (See Section 6.3.3 for the performance evaluation of the RHR pumps in their core cooling function.)
| |
| All active components of the system were analyzed to show that the failure of any single active component does not prevent fulfilling the design function. This analysis is summarized in Table 6.2.2-3. A single failure in the residual heat removal system will not prevent long-term use of the spray system. The analyses of the loss-of-coolant accident presented in Chapter 15 reflect the single failure analysis. Each of the spray trains provides complete backup for the other.
| |
| An analysis of the spray return drains located in the refueling canal has been made to show that they are adequately sized for a maximum RHR and containment spray flow and ensures an adequate water supply in the lower compartment to satisfy pump NPSH requirements. It was shown that a water head of 4.16 feet between the refueling canal and the sump is sufficient to establish a steady-state drainage between the upper and lower compartment.
| |
| The passive portions of the spray systems located within the containment are designed to withstand, without loss of functional performance, a post accident containment environment and to operate without benefit of maintenance.
| |
| The spray headers which are located in the upper containment volume are separated from the reactor and primary coolant loops by the operating deck and inner wall of the ice bed. These spray headers are therefore protected from missiles originating in the lower compartment.
| |
| 6.2.2-6 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 This evaluation shows that the containment spray systems can withstand expected conditions during the 40-year life of the plant without loss of capability to perform the required safety functions. Specifically, the system achieved this by having been designed to meet applicable General Design Criteria (GDC) as follows:
| |
| (1) The systems can withstand the effects of natural phenomena as required by GDC 2.
| |
| (2) The systems are designed to accommodate the effects of and be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing, and postulated accidents including loss of coolant as required by GDC 4.
| |
| (3) The systems are not shared with another nuclear power unit as required by GDC 5.
| |
| (4) The systems are designed to be capable of being inspected and tested to ensure reliability throughout their life as required by GDC 39 and 40.
| |
| (5) The systems are designed adequately to provide post-accident cooling inside the primary containment to reduce the containment pressure and temperature following any LOCA and maintain them at acceptable levels, as required by GDC 38.
| |
| (6) The systems are designed to aid in the control and removal of fission products, hydrogen, oxygen, and other substances which may be released into the reactor containment following postulated accidents to assure that containment integrity is maintained, as required by GDC 41.
| |
| 6.2.2.4 Testing and Inspections Performance tests of the active components in the system are performed in the manufacturer's plant and followed by in-place preoperational testing.
| |
| Capability is provided to test initially and subsequently on a routine basis to the extent practical the operational startup sequence and performance capability of the containment spray system including the transfer to alternate power sources.
| |
| Capability to test periodically the delivery capacity of the containment spray system at a position as close to the spray header as is practical and for obstruction of the spray nozzles is provided. As part of the preoperational test program, the containment spray nozzles are physically verified to pass an unobstructed flow of air. The air is introduced into the headers through an air test connection on each header.
| |
| Initially, the containment spray system is hydrostatically tested to the applicable code test pressure.
| |
| All periodic tests of individual components or the complete containment spray system are controlled to ensure that plant safety is not jeopardized and that undesirable transients do not occur.
| |
| CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 The containment spray system is designed to comply with ASME Section XI, "Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Coolant System." Detailed test procedures are given in Chapter 14.
| |
| 6.2.2.5 Instrumentation Requirements The containment spray system is actuated either manually from the control room or external to the main control room or automatically by the coincidence of two sets out of four protection set loops monitoring the lower containment pressure. The high-high containment pressure signal starts the containment spray pumps and positions all valves to their operating configuration.
| |
| The operation of the containment spray system is verified by instrument readout in the control room. Pump motor breakers energize indicating lights on the control panel to show power is being supplied to the pump motors. Status lights on the main control panel indicate valve position and are energized independently of the valve actuation signal.
| |
| To protect the pumps from low flow conditions, a mini-flow recirculation line is provided to allow pump discharge to be circulated back into the pump suction line. This line is opened by a motor-operated valve when flow in the discharge line drops below that required for pump protection or if, upon starting, flow is not achieved in the spray header within a preset time interval. Elbow taps in each discharge line provide a delta-p measurement to monitor the flow rate and provide the flow signal for the control room flow indicators and to control the minimum flow recirculation valve.
| |
| Local instruments monitor the following parameters: containment spray pump suction and discharge pressure, heat exchanger inlet temperature, heat exchanger inlet and outlet pressure, and containment spray test line flow.
| |
| In the event of a main control room evacuation, the necessary control functions are transferable to outside of the main control room in order to assure that the system can be aligned and locked to prevent inadvertent operation and to manually initiate system operation if necessary. The control transfer is provided for the spray pumps, containment spray isolation valves, and containment sump isolation valves.
| |
| The system is designed as Seismic Category I. The instrumentation and associated interconnected wiring and cables are physically and otherwise separated so that a single event cannot cause malfunction of the entire system.
| |
| 6.2.2.6 Materials All parts of the containment spray system in contact with borated water are austenitic stainless steel or equivalent corrosion-resistant material. None of these materials produce radiolytic or pyrolytic decomposition products that can interfere with this or other engineered safety features.
| |
| 6.2.2-8 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.2-1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP/MOTOR DESIGN PARAMETERS Pump Quantity Per Unit 2 Design Pressure, psig 300 Design Temperature, °F 250 Design Flow Rate, gpm 4000 Design Head, ft 435 Motor Horsepower, hp 700 Service Factor 1.15 Voltage, V 6600 Phase 3 Cycles, Hz 60 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS 6.2.2-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Table 6.2.2-2 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Design Parameters Quantity Per Unit 2 Type Counter Flow Percent Tubes Plugged 10%
| |
| Heat Transfer Per Unit, Btu/hr 12.85 x 107 Shell-Side Flow, gpm 5,200 Tube-Side Flow, gpm 4,000 Tube-Side Inlet Temperature, °F 190 Shell-Side Inlet Temperature, °F 85 Tube-Side Outlet Temperature, °F 124.7 Shell-Side Outlet Temperature, °F 129.5 Design Pressure (Shell/Tube), psig 150/300 Design Temperature (Shell/Tube), °F 200/250 Heat Exchanger UA, Btu/hr-°F 2.74 x 106 6.2.2-10 CONTAINMENT HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEMS
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Heat Removal Systems WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.2-1 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Flow Diagram Containment Spray System 6.2.2-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Heat Removal Systems WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.2-2 Containment Spray Pump Performance Curves 6.2.2-12
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Heat Removal Systems WBNP-71 Figure 6.2.2-3 Reactor Bldgs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System 6.2.2-13 Piping Plan of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header A
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.2-4 Powerhouse-Auxiliary & Reactor Bldgs Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Piping Containment Heat Removal Systems 6.2.2-14
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Heat Removal Systems WBNP-71 Figure 6.2.2-5 Reactor Blogs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Piping 6.2.2-15 Plan of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header B
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Heat Removal Systems WBNP-71 Figure 6.2.2-6 Reactor Bldgs. Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Containment Spray System Piping Section of Spray Patterns From C.S. Loop Header B 6.2.2-16
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2.3 Secondary Containment Functional Design Structures included as part of the secondary containment system are the Shield Building of each reactor unit, the Auxiliary Building, and the Condensate Demineralizer Waste Evaporator (CDWE) Building. Depending on the configuration of the plant, the Primary Containment Building of a unit may also be included as a structure which is part of the secondary containment system. This condition exists when the primary containment is open to the Auxiliary Building. Primary containment may be open to the Auxiliary Building during cold shutdown or refueling, and also during the construction phase of Unit 2. The areas within the auxiliary building secondary containment enclosure (ABSCE) boundary at a minimum include the Auxiliary Building and CDWE Building and additionally include the annulus and primary containment of each unit for plant configurations during which these areas are open to the Auxiliary Building. The emergency gas treatment system (EGTS) is provided for ventilation control and cleanup of the atmosphere inside the annulus between the Shield Building and the Primary Containment Building of each reactor unit. The auxiliary building gas treatment system (ABGTS) provides a similar contamination control capability in the ABSCE.
| |
| 6.2.3.1 Design Bases 6.2.3.1.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures Design bases for the secondary containment structures were devised to assure that an effective barrier exists for airborne fission products that may leak from the primary containment during a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). Within the scope of these design bases are requirements that influence the size, structural integrity, and leak tightness of the secondary containment enclosure. Specifically, these include a capability to: (a) maintain an effective barrier for gases and vapors that may leak from the primary containment during all normal and abnormal events; (b) delay the release of any gases and vapors that may leak from the primary containment during a LOCA; (c) allow gases and vapors that may leak through the primary containment during a LOCA to flow into the contained air volume within the secondary containment where they are diluted, held up, and purified prior to being released to the environs; (d) bleed to the secondary containment each air-filled containment penetration enclosure which extends beyond the Shield Building and which is formed by automatically actuated isolation valves; (e) maintain an effective barrier for airborne radioactive contaminants, gases, and vapors originating in the Auxiliary Building during all normal and abnormal events.
| |
| Refer to Sections 3.8.1 and 3.8.4 for further details relating to the design of the Shield Building and the Auxiliary Building.
| |
| 6.2.3.1.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS)
| |
| The design bases for the EGTS are:
| |
| Design Bases 6.2.3-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-90 (1) To keep the air pressure within each Shield Building annulus below atmospheric pressure at all times in which the integrity of that particular containment is required.
| |
| (2) To reduce the concentration of radioactive nuclides in annulus air that is released to the environs during a LOCA in either reactor unit to levels sufficiently low to keep the site boundary and low population zone (LPZ) dose rates below the 10 CFR 100 values.
| |
| (3) To withstand the safe shutdown earthquake.
| |
| (4) To provide for initial and periodic testing of the system capability to function as designed.
| |
| 6.2.3.1.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS)
| |
| The design bases for the ABGTS are:
| |
| (1) To establish and keep an air pressure that is below atmospheric within the portion of the buildings serving as a secondary containment enclosure during accidents.
| |
| (2) To reduce the concentration of radioactive nuclides in air releases from the secondary containment enclosures to the environs during accidents to levels sufficiently low to keep the site boundary and LPZ dose rates below the 10 CFR 100 guideline values.
| |
| (3) To minimize the spreading of airborne radioactivity within the Auxiliary Building following an accidental release in the fuel handling and waste packaging areas.
| |
| (4) To withstand the safe shutdown earthquake.
| |
| (5) To provide for initial and periodic testing of the system capability to function as designed.
| |
| 6.2.3.2 System Design 6.2.3.2.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures (1) Shield Building The principal components that function collectively to form a secondary containment barrier around the steel primary containment vessel are the Shield Building itself, the Shield Building penetration seals, the isolation valves installed in the penetrations to the Shield Building, and the Shield Building penetration leakoff facilities.
| |
| Structure 6.2.3-2 System Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 The Shield Building is a reinforced concrete structure that encloses the reactor's steel primary containment structure; it has a circular horizontal cross section and a shallow domed roof. The vertical center line of this building is also the vertical center line of the steel primary containment vessel. The inside diameter of this building was sized to provide an annular shaped air space between the two reactor enclosures that is five feet wide. The total enclosed free air space between the two enclosures is approximately 396,000 cubic feet. Additional data on the Shield Building is provided in Section 3.8.1 and in Table 6.2.3-1.
| |
| Penetrations To ensure that the Shield Building provides a nearly leak tight enclosure for the primary containment structure all openings in the shield building penetrations are sealed. Typical mechanical piping or ventilation penetrations are equipped with a flexible membrane seal as shown in Figure 6.2.3-1. The leakage rate for mechanical penetrations is no greater than 0.0052 cfm per square inch when secondary containment is at a minus 0.5 inch water gauge. The primary containment personnel hatch passes through the Shield Building and opens directly to the Auxiliary Building. This opening in the Shield Building wall is handled as an ordinary piping penetration and is provided with a flexible, double membrane seal as shown in Figure 3.8.2-5 (see Section 3.8.2). Personnel and equipment access doors to the secondary containment are treated as special cases and are provided with resilient seals as shown in Figures 3.8.4-21 through 3.8.4-23. (See Section 3.8.4 for descriptions of the personnel access doors and the equipment access doors.) The allowable leakage for each personnel access door is 0.5 cfm when secondary containment is at minus 1 inch water gauge, and 60 cfm for the equipment access hatch when secondary containment is at minus 0.75 inch water gauge.
| |
| Air filled lines which must be isolated by automatic valve actuation and which penetrate both the primary containment and the shield building are considered more likely to pass airborne radioactivities than other lines.
| |
| Therefore these lines are provided with a third isolation valve outside the secondary containment for additional leak protection. This single, third valve receives both Train A and B actuation signals. Electronic buffering prevents an electrical failure in one train from affecting the performance of the other.
| |
| To enhance the effectiveness of the third isolation valve as a barrier to leakage, the enclosed volume between the second and third isolation valves is opened to the annulus during isolation. Opening this enclosed space to the annulus is accomplished with leakoff facilities as shown in Figure 6.2.3-2.
| |
| This allows the negative pressure in the annulus to include this small volume, and leakage from the primary containment outward or leakage from outside the Shield Building inward is drawn into the annulus for processing. The lines provided with this feature are those for the primary containment purge supply and exhaust and the lower compartment pressure relief.
| |
| System Design 6.2.3-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Electrical penetrations are of either a cable tray/cable slot type or a conduit type. Typical seals for these penetrations are shown in Figure 6.2.3-3. For cable tray/cable slot penetrations, silicone room temperature vulcanizing (RTV) foam is used as the sealant around cables within the wall opening over a portion of the length of the cable slot penetration. In conduit penetrations, the interstitial spaces between cables and conduit or condulet walls are filled with RTV silicone rubber as the sealant over a portion of the length of the penetration. The leakage rate for electrical penetrations is limited to 0.014 cfm per square inch when secondary containment is at a minus 0.5 inch water gauge.
| |
| The total expected infiltration rate across all leakage paths into the annulus is 250 cfm at the post accident annulus control setpoint. During normal operation the annulus is maintained at a negative pressure of 5.0 inches water gauge with respect to the outside atmosphere. Periodic tests demonstrate that inleakage is less than this value.
| |
| The fraction of primary containment leakage which may bypass the Shield Building and go directly to the Auxiliary Building is specified to be no greater than 25% of the total primary containment out-leakage. Permitting this leakage fraction results in acceptable site boundary and LPZ doses for the LOCA condition as described in Chapter 15. There are no paths by which primary containment leakage may bypass both the Shield Building and the Auxiliary Building.
| |
| Information concerning isolation features utilized in support of the secondary containment is presented in Section 6.2.4. Potential leakage paths by which primary containment leakage could bypass the secondary containment, and measures utilized to prevent such leakage are also discussed in Section 6.2.4.
| |
| (2) Auxiliary Building Structure The Auxiliary Building is a conventional reinforced concrete structure located between the Reactor Building and the Control Building as shown in Figures 1.2-4 through 1.2-10. Its basic functions are to house support and safety equipment for the primary steam system and to provide an isolation barrier during certain postulated accidents involving airborne radioactive contamination. Certain of the buildings interior and exterior walls, floor slabs, and a part of its roof form the isolation barrier as shown in Figures 6.2.3-4 through 6.2.3-10. The enclosed volume is approximately 6.9 x 106 cubic feet.
| |
| The only openings in the isolation barrier are sealed mechanical and electrical penetrations or air locks. The building itself is by design and construction virtually leak tight. Additional data on the Auxiliary Building is provided in Section 3.8.4 and Table 6.2.3-1.
| |
| The accident situations for which the Auxiliary Building isolation barrier serves as the containment barrier are those involving irradiated fuel within the 6.2.3-4 System Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 confines of the building and spills or leaks of radioactive materials from tanks and process lines inside the building. During a LOCA, the Auxiliary Building isolation barrier serves as part of the secondary containment enclosure for situations when any through-the-line leakage from primary containment bypasses the Shield Building and enters the Auxiliary Building.
| |
| Penetrations Mechanical and electrical penetration seals in the isolation barrier are similar to those for the Shield Building. Other potential leakage paths into the Auxiliary Building are ventilation openings and equipment and personnel access points.
| |
| Auxiliary Building ventilation supply and exhaust ducts except those for the ABGTS are provided with two low leakage isolation dampers in series. These two isolation dampers are heavy duty with resilient seals along the blade edges. The dampers are air-operated and fail in the closed position upon loss of power.
| |
| Entrances and exits to those portions of the Auxiliary Building within the containment barrier for both equipment and personnel are through air locks. The air lock locations are shown in Figures 1.2-3 and 1.2-5. The doors in each air lock are electrically interlocked such that only one side of the air lock can be opened at a time. Local and control room alarms are provided should both sides of an air lock ever be opened simultaneously. As a safety precaution, an interlock defeat switch is mounted on the containment side of each air lock to allow emergency egress should either side of the air lock be blocked open in an accident. The railway access doors and hatches are described in Section 3.8.4.
| |
| A special case is the interlock system for the large exterior door to the railway loading area. The large door is treated as one side of the air lock and either the two doors leading to the fuel handling area or the railway access hatch covers above can act as the other side of the lock. When the large railroad door is open, neither of the doors to the fuel handling area nor the access hatches above can be opened, and when either of these two doors and either of the access hatches above are open, the large railway access door cannot be opened. These doors are also provided with local and main control room alarms should both sides of the air lock ever be opened simultaneously.
| |
| The total permissible leakage rate for the ABSCE at a pressure of -0.25 inches water gauge with respect to the outside is 9300 cfm maximum. This represents 165.5% of the ABSCE free volume per day. Periodic tests demonstrate that inleakage is less than the design value. Any improvement in the inleakage recorded during subsequent test, shall be used to establish the allowable margin for breaching permits.
| |
| (3) Auxiliary Building Secondary Containment Enclosure The Auxiliary Building secondary containment enclosure (ABSCE) is that portion of the Auxiliary Building and CDWE Building (and for certain configurations, the annulus and primary containment, as discussed below) which serves to maintain an effective barrier for airborne radioactive contaminants released in the auxiliary building during abnormal events. Mechanical and electrical penetrations of this enclosure are System Design 6.2.3-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 provided with seals to minimize infiltration. Piping penetrations are either analyzed to pressure boundary retention requirements, or the effects of their failure are demonstrated not to impair the ability of the ABGTS system to maintain the ABSCE under the required negative pressure of 0.25 inches w.g., or they are isolated by physical means (e.g., locked-closed valves, etc.) Airlock-type doors are provided at portals where needed by the frequency of use. A negative pressure is maintained within the ABSCE to ensure that no contaminated air is released to the environs following an abnormal event without first being processed by the auxiliary building gas treatment system (ABGTS). The ABSCE is shown in Figures 6.2.3-4 though 6.2.3-10.
| |
| During periods when the primary containment and annulus of a unit are open to the Auxiliary Building, the ABSCE also includes the primary containment and the annulus of that unit. During this condition, operator action is taken to ensure that the purge air ventilation system is shutdown. During the construction phase of Unit 2, the Unit 2 primary containment and annulus are always open to the ABSCE with the Unit 2 containment purge system physically isolated from the outside environment by means of locked-closed isolation dampers and valves.
| |
| Doors and penetrations of the ABSCE perimeter are provided with seals to reduce infiltration. Doors entering the area are either locked or under administrative control.
| |
| Automatic redundant isolation dampers are provided in ducts which pass from areas inside the ABSCE to areas outside of the enclosure. These permit isolation of the ABSCE and allow the ABGTS to maintain a negative pressure in the area following an abnormal event.
| |
| The ABGTS maintains a negative pressure with respect to the outside in the ABSCE during emergency operation and processes all Auxiliary Building exhaust. Either train of the ABGTS may be used to maintain the negative pressure and treat air exhausted from the ABSCE.
| |
| Isolation of the ABSCE is initiated by a Phase A containment isolation signal, a high radiation signal from the fuel handling area radiation monitors, or a high temperature in the Unit 1 outside air intakes for the Auxiliary Building. Any one of these signals automatically starts the ABGTS and closes all isolation dampers in the ABSCE boundary.
| |
| The annulus vacuum control subsystem continues to operate whenever the ABSCE is isolated, except for a Phase A containment isolation signal. A Phase A containment isolation signal which is generated by a LOCA starts the air cleanup subsystem of the emergency gas treatment system. Calculations have shown that this condition does not result in exceeding the limits given in 10 CFR 100. For additional description of the annulus vacuum control subsystem of the EGTS, see Section 6.2.3.2.2.
| |
| Proper actuation of the isolation dampers associated with the ABSCE and operation of the ABGTS is confirmed during preoperational testing.
| |
| 6.2.3-6 System Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-90 6.2.3.2.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS)
| |
| The EGTS is shown schematically in Figure 6.2.3-11. The logic and control diagrams for this system are shown in Figures 6.2.3-12 to 6.2.3-15. This system has two subsystems; one is the annulus vacuum control subsystem and the other is the air cleanup subsystem. The portions of the EGTS necessary to ensure that the system performs its functions during post-accident operation are classified Seismic Category I.
| |
| Portions of the system which are not necessary for post-accident operation are seismically qualified to the extent that the system is not adversely affected if they should fail due to the seismic event; that is, they are qualified Seismic Category I(L).
| |
| Annulus Vacuum Control Subsystem The annulus vacuum control subsystem is a fan and duct network used to establish and keep a negative pressure level within the annular space between the two reactor containment structures. It is utilized during normal operations in which containment integrity is required. In emergencies in which containment isolation is required, this subsystem is isolated and shut down. Under such an operating condition, this subsystem performs no safety-related function after the need for containment isolation has been established. Because of this, the annulus vacuum control subsystem is not classified as an engineered safety feature.
| |
| This subsystem has two independently controlled branches. Each branch serves one reactor unit. These branches draw air from their assigned annuli and release it into the Auxiliary Building exhaust duct system. The air inlet for each branch is centrally located in the secondary containment volume above the steel containment dome.
| |
| During the interim period when Unit 2 is under construction, the Unit 2 annulus vacuum control subsystem is isolated from the Unit 1 subsystem by means of blank-off plates located at the fan discharge.
| |
| Air pressure control in each secondary containment annulus is achieved with a redundant fan, differential pressure sensor, motor operated damper and control circuitry installation incorporated into each branch. This equipment provides a capability to vary the volumetric flow rate drawn from the annulus to keep the pressure at a predetermined negative pressure level. This control function is accomplished with a modulating damper under control of a differential pressure sensor that adjusts the amount of outside air introduced upstream of a constant capacity fan in the proper manner to keep the annulus pressure within a designated narrow range. Two independent installations of these items are provided to promote operational efficiency.
| |
| One of the two is utilized as a standby redundant unit that starts automatically in the event the operating control unit fails to function in the proper manner.
| |
| The fans and flow control dampers serving both reactor secondary containment annuli are installed in an Auxiliary Building room at elevation 757' adjacent to the Unit 2 Shield Building.
| |
| The nominal negative pressure for each annulus vacuum control equipment installation is 5-inches of water gauge below atmospheric. The negative pressure level chosen for normal operation ensures that the annulus pressure will not reach positive System Design 6.2.3-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 values during the annulus pressure surge produced by a LOCA in the primary containment. Two 100% capacity fans per reactor unit are utilized to maintain this negative pressure. One fan per unit is normally on standby.
| |
| Air Cleanup Subsystem The air cleanup subsystem is a redundant, shared airflow network having the capability to perform two functions for the affected reactor secondary containment during a LOCA. One of these is to keep the secondary containment annulus air volume below atmospheric pressure. The second function is to remove airborne particulates and vapors that may contain radioactive nuclides from air drawn from the annulus. Each of these is accomplished by this subsystem without disturbing operation of the unaffected reactor unit.
| |
| Both of these functions are performed by processing and controlling a stream of air taken from the affected reactor unit secondary containment annulus. The air cleanup operation is conducted by drawing the air stream through a series of filters and adsorbers. Annulus air pressure control is accomplished by adjusting the fraction of the airstream that is returned to the annulus air space. During the interim period when Unit 2 is under construction, the EGTS ductwork which exhausts air from the Unit 2 annulus is isolated from the air cleanup units by means of locked-closed isolation valves, while the supply ductwork is isolated by blank-off plates.
| |
| The negative pressure control setpoint chosen for post-accident operation is low enough that leakage across the boundary is into the annulus from both the primary containment and areas adjacent to the Shield Building. The minimum negative pressure in the annulus meets the requirements of NUREG-0800. The pressure differentials produced by wind effects are also overcome by appropriate selection of the annulus negative pressure level.
| |
| The rated capacity of each redundant air cleanup unit in the subsystem is 4000 cfm.
| |
| This subsystem of the EGTS is classified as an engineered safety feature.
| |
| The air flow network for the air cleanup subsystem was designed to provide the redundant services needed for either reactor secondary containment annulus. The intakes and ducting in this network used to bring annulus air to the EGTS room on elevation 757' in the Auxiliary Building are those also used by the annulus vacuum control subsystem. The intake is centrally located within each Shield Building above the steel containment dome. Within the EGTS room the network branches out in a manner to supply two air cleanup unit installations that can be aligned with flow control dampers to serve either annulus air volume. After the air is processed, the air cleanup subsystem air flow network directs the air to redundant damper controlled flow dividers in each reactor unit annulus. At these points, the flow network contains two air flow paths leading to the reactor unit vent and two air flow paths to a manifold that distributes and releases the air uniformly around the bottom of the annulus. The vertical separation between the intake above the dome and the exhaust ports in the manifold is 168: feet. Butterfly valves, rather than dampers, are installed in the ducts just above the flow distribution manifold to minimize the outside air inleakage from the reactor unit vents into the annulus.
| |
| 6.2.3-8 System Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Another feature incorporated into the air cleanup subsystem air flow network is the capability to cool the filters and adsorbers in an inactive air cleanup unit that is loaded with radioactive material. This is accomplished with two cross-over flow ducts that can draw air at 200 cfm from the active air cleanup unit through the inactive air cleanup unit.
| |
| (Such an air flow is sufficient to keep the temperature rise through a fully loaded inactive air cleanup unit to less than 75°F.) Two butterfly valves in series are installed in each cross-over air flow path to assure sufficient isolation to perform accurate removal efficiency tests on the HEPA filter and carbon absorber banks. After a Phase A containment isolation signal has initiated EGTS operation, the control room operator will shut one of the two EGTS trains down and align the appropriate butterfly valves for automatic operation. In addition, the associated suction valve is remotely opened from the main control room to establish a flow path from the affected annulus through the air cleanup unit.
| |
| This feature is provided in the event excessive absorber bed temperature occurs following the failure of an operating EGTS train. Absorber bed temperature is recorded in the main control room and status indication of each EGTS train is also provided.
| |
| Upon failure of an operating EGTS train, absorber bed temperature is monitored to detect subsequent temperature rise. The two air cleanup units in the air cleanup subsystem are stainless steel housings containing air treatment equipment, samples, heaters, drains, test fittings, and access facilities for maintenance. See Section 6.5.1.2.1 for a description of the air cleanup units and information related to their design.
| |
| Two centrifugal fans are provided outside the air cleanup unit housings. Each of these is associated with a specific air cleanup unit. These fans were designed to function in process air flow streams at temperatures up to 200°F. See Table 6.2.3-1 for additional information on these fans.
| |
| Two air flow control modules are also included in the air cleanup subsystem. Each consists of a differential pressure sensor and transmitter, control circuitry, a damper actuator, and two modulating dampers. The single damper actuator adjusts the dampers simultaneously in opposite directions, i.e., one is closed as the other is opened.
| |
| A pressure controller, located in the main control room, modulates pressure control dampers in the annulus to maintain the differential pressure setpoint. Two sets of independent pressure control dampers installed in the secondary containment annulus provide the capability to adjust the amount of air recirculated to the reactor unit annulus or discharged to the shield building exhaust vent. Annulus pressures that are more positive than the pressure controller setpoint produce a signal causing the damper actuator to begin closing the damper controlling the air flow to the annulus and to start opening the damper controlling the air flow to the Shield Building exhaust vent.
| |
| Annulus pressures that are more negative than the pressure controller setpoint initiate the opposite kind of damper motions.
| |
| Four isolation valves installed in the secondary containment annulus provide isolation of the pressure control dampers. Two handswitches in the control room are positioned System Design 6.2.3-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 so that one set of isolation valves is in auto and the other is in standby. A containment isolation Phase A signal causes the valves in the auto position to open and the standby valves to remain closed. The open isolation valves provide a flow path for one set of pressure control dampers which modulate to control annulus pressure. When abnormal annulus pressure is detected, an "open" signal is sent to the standby isolation valves and a "close" signal is sent to the valves in the auto position. This transfers annulus pressure control to the other set of pressure control dampers. For further details, see Figures 6.2.3-14 and 6.2.3-15.
| |
| Operation of the air cleanup subsystem during accidents is initiated by the Phase A containment isolation signal. Both the A and the B trains will be started by this signal coming from either reactor unit. A capability is also provided to start both trains with a hand switch in the main control room. Damper alignment is also initiated by the same signal; however, just those associated with the affected reactor unit will be activated.
| |
| Another adjustment of a hand switch in the main control room will change the operating mode to the single train operation with the redundant train in a standby status.
| |
| Employment of this operating mode is expected after the first 30 minutes of operation.
| |
| The control room operator can select either train to remain in operation.
| |
| 6.2.3.2.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS)
| |
| The ABGTS is a fully redundant air cleanup network provided to reduce radioactive nuclide releases from the secondary containment enclosure during accidents. It does this by drawing air from the fuel handling and waste packaging areas through ducting normally used for ventilation purposes to air cleanup equipment, and then directing this air to the reactor unit vent. In doing so, this system draws air from all parts of the Auxiliary Building and the CDWE Building to establish a negative pressure region in which virtually no unprocessed air passes from this secondary containment enclosure to the atmosphere. During the construction phase of Unit 2 and during certain shutdown or refueling conditions, the primary containment and annulus of the affected unit(s) may be open to the Auxiliary Building. The ABGTS has been designed to establish a negative pressure in these additional areas for these configurations. Since the purge ventilation fans and instrument room fans, in addition to the normal ventilation system, may be operating during these conditions, an ABI signal shuts down these ventilation systems and closes associated isolation dampers/valves and starts the ABGTS.
| |
| All portions of the ABGTS that are required to ensure that the system functions properly are classified Seismic Category I. Certain portions of the system are not required for post-accident operation of the ABGTS. Those portions are seismically qualified to the extent that system operation is not adversely affected should they fail due to the seismic event (i.e., they are classified according to Seismic Category I(L)).
| |
| The rated capacity of each redundant air cleanup unit in this gas treatment system is 9000 cfm. These were designed in accordance with engineered safety feature standards.
| |
| The unique portions of the ABGTS are shown schematically in Figures 6.2.3-16 and 9.4-8. Logic and control diagrams for the ABGTS are shown in Figures 9.4-10 and 6.2.3-10 System Design
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 9.4-17. The airflow network for this system consists of two parallel duct installations originating from exhaust ducting that normally serves the fuel handling and waste packaging areas in the building. Each of these ducts lead directly to an air cleanup unit, to the fan associated with the air cleanup unit, and then directly to the reactor unit vent.
| |
| The air flow network that is not unique to this system consists of most of the normal ventilation ducting installed in the ABSCE. When the ABSCE is isolated, this duct network provides a flow path for reducing the air pressure level in all parts of this enclosure. In some instances, air is drawn in the opposite direction to the normal air flow pattern during operation of the ABGTS. Two air cleanup units are utilized in the ABGTS. Each unit includes air treatment components instrumentation, test fittings, and other equipment required for proper operations and testing of the system. Refer to Section 6.5.1.2.2 for a description of the ABGTS air cleanup units and information related to their design.
| |
| Air is drawn through each of these air cleanup units by a belt driven centrifugal fan.
| |
| The drive for the fan is an electric motor. Additional information on these fans is given in Table 6.2.3-1.
| |
| The air flow control modules utilized in the ABGTS contain a differential pressure sensor and transmitter, control circuitry, and a modulating damper. These air flow control modules provide the capability for keeping the pressure within the ABSCE at a minimum of 1/4 inch water gauge below atmospheric. The modules do this by varying the amount of air drawn from this enclosed volume in a manner to keep the pressure at this desired negative value. This is done with a modulating damper that is controlled by the differential pressure transmitter and differential pressure controller circuit to adjust the amount of outside air introduced into the duct network just upstream of the constant capacity fan described above. Such action brings in sufficient outside air to keep the fan flow rate at its rated flow at all times. It also draws enough air from the ABSCE to establish and keep the desired negative pressure level.
| |
| The negative pressure level chosen for post-accident operation is sufficiently low to ensure that airborne contamination present in the Auxiliary Building is not released to the environs without being processed by an air cleanup assembly. External pressure gradients produced by wind loadings on the building do not adversely affect the ability of the ABGTS to maintain the negative pressure in the ABSCE.
| |
| The controls for the ABGTS are designed to provide two basic control modes. One control mode has either one of the air cleanup units in operation and the other in a state in which the redundant unit can automatically come into operation in the event the operating unit fails. Less than adequate pressure in the ABSCE is utilized in this control mode to make this failure determination. This operational redundancy is achieved with spatially separated power and control circuitry having different independent power sources to prevent a loss of function from any single system component failure. The term "Train A" is used to identify one complete set of full capacity equipment and the term "Train B" is used to identify the other set of full System Design 6.2.3-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 capacity equipment. Power for both equipment trains is supplied by the emergency power system.
| |
| Operation of the ABGTS begins automatically upon initiation of an auxiliary building isolation signal which is generated from any of the following signals:
| |
| (1) Phase A containment isolation signal from either reactor unit, or (2) High radiation signal from the spent fuel pool accident radiation monitors, or (3) High temperature signal from the Auxiliary Building air intakes.
| |
| Note: Unit 1 air intake only provides signal while Unit 2 is under construction)
| |
| A capability is also provided to start both trains with a hand switch in the main control room. Another adjustment capability provided in the hand switch in the main control room changes the operating mode to the single train operation with the redundant train in a standby status. Employment of this operating mode is expected after the first 30 minutes of operation. In this instance, the main control room operator has the capability to select either train to remain in operation. The standby unit selected automatically starts in the event the operating unit does not adequately maintain negative pressure in the ABSCE.
| |
| 6.2.3.3 Design Evaluation 6.2.3.3.1 Secondary Containment Enclosures The secondary containment enclosures are designed to provide a positive barrier to all potential primary containment leakage pathways during a LOCA and to radioactive contaminants released in accidental spills and fuel handling accidents that may occur in the Auxiliary Building. In a LOCA, the Shield Building containment enclosure provides the barrier to all airborne primary containment leakage, and the Auxiliary Building provides a barrier to through-the-line leakage which can potentially become airborne.
| |
| (1) Shield Building Structure The Shield Building provides the physical barrier for airborne primary containment leakage during a LOCA. Because the Shield Building completely encloses the free standing primary containment, all airborne leakage from primary containment passes into the annular region provided by this arrangement.
| |
| The building construction employs monolithic pours of concrete. This approach for structures of this type produces a very low leakage barrier. The low leakage characteristics of this barrier help to reduce the rate at which purified annulus air 6.2.3-12 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-92 must be released to maintain the enclosed volume at a negative pressure. This factor contributes significantly to keeping the site boundary and the low population zone (LPZ) dosage levels within 10 CFR 100 guidelines.
| |
| The size of the annular region between the primary containment and the shield building assures a residence time for all leakage into the annulus.
| |
| Penetrations The shield building wall is provided with more than 200 penetrations to accommodate mechanical equipment piping, cable trays, and electrical conduit which leave and enter the Shield Building. Due to the low leakage characteristics of the building, leakage through the Shield Building wall is restricted almost entirely to openings in these penetrations. The design assures that penetration leakage does not exceed predetermined quantities. Such a capability ensures that the inleakage is sufficiently low to keep the dose contributions at the site boundary and to the LPZ within 10 CFR 100 guidelines.
| |
| Openings in mechanical piping penetrations are sealed principally as shown in Figure 6.2.3-1. The seals are a flexible membrane type of single gaskets which incorporate fire resistant materials and are designed to withstand the combinations of Shield Building and piping movements in the SSE and retain their functional integrity. In addition, seals at or below the probable maximum flood elevation are designed to be water tight for flood static head and surge forces. All seals, where possible, are installed outside the Shield Building such that whether during normal operation, accidents, or flood, the differential pressures will tend to enhance the tightness of the seal. The design integrated dose for the Shield Building penetration following a LOCA is 6.7 x 106 rads and the penetration seal materials have been selected accordingly.
| |
| Cables routed in cable trays pass through the Shield Building wall through rectangular cable slot penetrations as shown in Figure 6.2.3-3. The sealant material installed around cables over a portion of the length of the cable slot is silicone RTV (room temperature vulcanizing) foam and is RTV silicone rubber installed around cables within conduits. The seals are typically shown in Figure 6.2.3-3 and are designed to withstand the SSE and retain their integrity. Electrical penetration seals are allowed twice the leakage of mechanical seals to provide sufficient margin in meeting the total allowable Shield Building leakage requirements.
| |
| The personnel and equipment access doors to the Shield Building are designed with heat resistant, resilient seals which reduce their leakage to the allowable values as stated in Section 6.2.3.2. These doors are designed to retain their structural integrity and leak tightness during a SSE as described in Sections 3.8.1 and 3.8.2. To allow personnel access to the annulus during operation, the annulus personnel access doors form an airlock. The doors are electrically interlocked such that only one of the pair may be opened at a time, but an electric interlock defeat switch is provided inside the annulus to provide for emergency Design Evaluation 6.2.3-13
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 egress from the annulus should the door on the Auxiliary Building side of the lock be blocked open during an accident. Therefore, a continuous secondary containment barrier is provided while allowing personnel movement. The interlock is equipped with a local alarm and a control room annunciation to indicate should both doors ever be opened simultaneously.
| |
| The fuel transfer tubes penetrate the primary and secondary containment on their way to the Auxiliary Building. Each transfer tube has a blind flange on the inboard side of primary containment, equipped with double O-rings and a pressure test connection between the O-rings. The valve in the Auxiliary Building end of the transfer tube serves as the secondary containment isolation valve. The inner space between the primary containment flange and the isolation valve is bled to the annulus so that any leakage into the tube from primary containment or the Auxiliary Building flows into the annulus. The bleed line is routed above the maximum refueling pool water level to preclude accidental spills of refueling water.
| |
| (2) Auxiliary Building Structure The entire Auxiliary Building including walls, roof, and interior partitions is constructed by consecutive monolithic pours of concrete. This method of assembly produces a structure with very low leakage characteristics. The portions of the building chosen to constitute the isolation barrier were selected such that all sources of potential contamination are completely enclosed.
| |
| Therefore, the structure utilized to form the Auxiliary Building containment envelope functions effectively as a barrier to the environs. This same structure also helps to reduce inleakage into the Auxiliary Building containment envelope during accidents to levels easily accommodated by the ABGTS.
| |
| Penetrations Seals for mechanical penetrations are a flexible membrane type or single gaskets. They are designed to withstand Auxiliary Building and piping movements in the SSE and retain their structural integrity. The materials chosen for the seals are fire resistant. All seals, where possible, are designed such that whether during normal operation or accidents, the differential pressures tend to enhance the tightness of the seal. Sealing methods for electrical penetrations are similar to those for the shield building electrical penetrations.
| |
| Each ventilation duct penetrating the auxiliary building secondary containment enclosure (ABSCE) is equipped with two isolation dampers in series. The dampers have resilient blade end and blade edge seals which are designed to retain their functional characteristics. The motor operators for these dampers have been sized to tightly close the damper blades against their resilient seals.
| |
| The damper and motor operator assemblies are designed to operate during and after the SSE.
| |
| 6.2.3-14 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Piping penetrations are either analyzed to pressure boundary retention requirements, or the effects of their failure are demonstrated to not impair the ability of the ABGTS system to maintain the ABSCE under the required negative pressure of 0.25 inches w.g., or they are isolated by physical means (e.g., locked-closed valves, etc.
| |
| 6.2.3.3.2 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS)
| |
| The EGTS has the capabilities needed to preserve safety in accidents as severe as the design basis LOCA. To verify that the proper features are provided, functional analyses were conducted which consist of failure modes and effects analysis of the system, reviews of Regulatory Guide 1.52 sections to assure licensing requirement conformance, and performance analyses to verify that the system has the desired accident mitigation capabilities. A detailed failure modes and effects analysis is presented in Table 6.2.3-2. The system is shown schematically in Figure 6.2.3-11.
| |
| The functional analyses conducted on the EGTS have shown that:
| |
| (1) Adequate isolation of the annulus vacuum control subsystem during accidents is provided. The two low leakage valves in series upstream of the annulus vacuum control subsystem fans used to isolate the two subsystems--one operated by each subsystem train--give assurance that the annulus vacuum control subsystem will be isolated during accidents. These valves fail closed.
| |
| (2) The air flow control dampers in the air cleanup subsystem align to service the affected reactor units. The network was designed to have all of the air flow control dampers shown in Figures 6.2.3-18 and 6.2.3-19 needed to service a particular reactor unit responsive to only the containment isolation signal from that particular reactor unit.
| |
| (3) The system intake and recirculation air outlets, shown on Figures 6.2.3-18 and 6.2.3-19, within the Shield Building annulus are positioned to promote mixing and dilution of primary containment leakage. Positioning the recirculated air manifold and the air outlets almost completely around the base of the annulus below the level of the containment penetrations assures a clean air flow past most of the penetrations. This air, warmed by the relative humidity heater, flows upward past these likely sources of leakage. In doing so, the flow impediments (i.e., penetrations, and structures within the annulus) tend to redirect this air flow to induce mixing and dilution.
| |
| Substantial amounts of mixing and dilution are likely in the vertical rise of over 168 feet to the system air intake above the steel containment dome.
| |
| (4) System startup reliability is very high. The practice of starting up both full capacity trains in the system simultaneously gives greater assurance that one train of equipment functions promptly upon receipt of an accident signal.
| |
| Design Evaluation 6.2.3-15
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 (5) The use of a single actuator in each equipment train to adjust dampers controlling the air flow recirculated and vented improves train reliability and minimizes the possibility of annulus pressure instability. Simultaneous adjustment that closes one damper and opens the other eliminates the hunting problems that could arise from nonsimultaneous operation of separately actuated dampers.
| |
| (6) The Train A and Train B air cleanup units are adequately protected from each other to eliminate the possibility of a single failure destroying the capability to process annulus air during emergencies. The 13.5 feet high and 27 inch thick concrete wall built between the two units protects each from missiles originating in the other unit.
| |
| The EGTS, designed prior to issuance of Regulatory Guide 1.52, is in general agreement with requirements in the guide. Details on this compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.52 are given in Table 6.5-1.
| |
| The performance analyses conducted to verify that the EGTS has the required accident mitigation capabilities were conducted in three basic parts. One of these was concerned with the capability for keeping the Shield Building annulus below atmospheric pressure at all times during a LOCA. The second part was an analysis of the cooling capabilities provided to keep temperatures within filters and adsorbers fully loaded with radioactive nuclides at safe levels. The third part was concerned with the site boundary and LPZ dosage contribution from radioactive nuclides present in annulus air releases during the design basis LOCA. These three analyses are discussed under the respective headings below.
| |
| Annulus Negative Pressure Control Capability The capability of the EGTS to keep the Shield Building annulus below atmospheric pressure during a design basis LOCA was established with a time iteration analysis performed by a computer. Energy and mass balances were accomplished successively in accordance with mass and volume changes calculated to take place during each time increment. Such a methodology allowed sufficient freedom to account for:
| |
| (1) Steel containment vessel growth from internal pressure, (2) Steel containment vessel growth from thermal expansion, (3) Outside air inleakage into the Shield Building annulus, and (4) Heat transfer from the steel containment structure to the annulus air mass.
| |
| To assure that this analysis was valid and conservative:
| |
| (1) Heat transfer from the primary containment atmosphere to the primary containment vessel was assumed to be convective. An air-steam mixture convective heat transfer coefficient was chosen to maximize heat transfer to 6.2.3-16 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 the secondary containment atmosphere. The constant value of 400 Btu/hr-ft2-°F given in Table 6.2.3-1 compares conservatively to the integrated transient heat transfer coefficients recommended in Branch Technical Position CSB 6-1. Heat transfer from the primary containment vessel to the annulus atmosphere and from the atmosphere to the secondary containment wall was assumed to be convective. Heat transfer from the primary containment vessel to the secondary containment wall was assumed to be by radiation. Forms of the transient convective heat transfer coefficients and values for the constant radiative heat transfer coefficients are given in Table 6.2.3-1. Consideration was given to the heat capacity of both the primary and secondary containment structures. The thermal conductivity and capacitance for these walls, as given in Table 6.2.3-1, agree closely with those obtained from Branch Technical Position CSB 6-1.
| |
| (2) The thermal growth of the steel vessel was based on linear expansion which was applied to the transient containment vessel temperature increases above the initial steady-state values to obtain the transient radial expansion (see Table 6.2.3-1 for total containment expansion). Temperature gradients were calculated for three regions: upper compartment, ice condenser, and lower compartment. The radial expansions in each of these three regions were converted to volume changes which were summed to yield a total annulus volume change due to primary containment vessel thermal expansion.
| |
| (3) Table 6.2.3-1 presents the characteristics of the internal pressure effects on the containment vessel. This model uses linear elastic thin shell theory to determine the expansion. The cylindrical portion of the vessel is assumed to act as a cylindrical shell with capped ends. The hemispherical dome expands uniformly as a simple sphere and includes the axial expansion of the cylinder.
| |
| External vertical and circumferential stiffeners are assumed not to be present so that conservative results are obtained. This pressure-induced growth was assumed to occur instantaneously at the start of the LOCA.
| |
| (4) Air leakage into the Shield Building annulus was assumed to be 250 cfm at the post accident annulus control setpoint.
| |
| (5) The air temperature in the annulus was assumed to be a thermally mixed average.
| |
| (6) Only one train of the EGTS was assumed to operate, allowing for a possible single failure in the other.
| |
| The initial steady state conditions used in this analysis were as follows (refer also to Table 6.2.3-1):
| |
| Design Evaluation 6.2.3-17
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Relative Pressure Temperature Humidity Containment upper compartment atm. 110°F 0%
| |
| Ice condenser compartment atm. 15°F 0%
| |
| Containment lower compartment atm. 120°F 0%
| |
| Shield Building annulus -5 in. w.g. 50°F 0%
| |
| Outside atm. 0° 0%
| |
| These initial values were chosen to maximize the secondary containment pressure after the LOCA. The initial pressure of minus 5.0 inches of water gauge with respect to the outside is the pressure maintained by the annulus vacuum control subsystem during normal operation. The initial temperature of 50°F is the estimated minimum temperature which was assumed for maximum annulus air density. Similarly, the initial relative humidity of 0% was assumed for maximum annulus air density.
| |
| The results obtained from this analysis are shown in Figure 6.2.3-17. This annulus pressure and EGTS exhaust rate vs. time curve indicates that, after the initial containment pressure induced step increase, the pressure rises to a peak value of approximately minus 0.67 inch of water in about 90 seconds after the LOCA begins.
| |
| The annulus pressure is then restored and maintained at or below the EGTS setpoint value as shown in Figure 6.2.3-17.
| |
| The expansion of approximately 1,234 ft3 due to internal temperature summed with the expansion of 766 ft3 from internal pressure yields a total primary containment vessel expansion of approximately 2,000 ft3. Such results indicate that:
| |
| (1) The negative pressure level of 5 inches of water below atmospheric in the Shield Building annulus maintained by the annulus vacuum control subsystem before an accident minimizes the amount of unfiltered radioactive nuclides potentially released to the environment before the air cleanup subsystem becomes operational.
| |
| (2) The rated flow rate of 4000 +10% cfm for each train of the air cleanup subsystem is adequate to keep the annulus pressure below the negative pressure setpoint throughout the remaining period of the LOCA.
| |
| Inactive Air Cleanup Unit Cooling Capabilities The second performance analysis conducted to show that the EGTS can cope with circumstances that may occur in a LOCA was concerned with temperature control capabilities provided for air filters and adsorbers loaded with radioactive material. The analysis conducted assumed accident releases in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.4 plus 1% solids, containment leakages of 0.25%/day for the first day and 0.125%/day from one to thirty days with all the activity being collected in a single air 6.2.3-18 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 cleanup unit. An additional assumption made was that all of the gamma and beta energy releases were transformed into heat within the filters and absorbers.
| |
| This occurs a few days after the LOCA takes place. The design objective is to assure that the air cleanup unit component temperatures do not exceed 200°F; it was found that a cooling air flow rate of 90 cfm is required. Such results indicate that the cooling air flow rate of 200 cfm provided for this purpose should keep the temperature within the carbon absorber bank well below the 620°F carbon ignition temperature.
| |
| Site Boundary and LPZ Dosage Contributions The last performance analysis conducted to show that the EGTS has the capability to perform in the required manner to preserve safety during a LOCA was concerned with the site boundary and LPZ dosage contributions arising from annulus air releases to the environs. This analysis is described and evaluated in Chapter 15.
| |
| 6.2.3.3.3 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS)
| |
| The ABGTS has the capabilities needed to preserve safety in accidents as severe as a LOCA. This was determined by conducting functional analyses of the system to verify that the system has the proper features for accident mitigation which consist of a failure modes and effects analysis, a review of Regulatory Guide 1.52 sections to assure licensing requirement conformance, and a performance analysis to verify that the system has the desired accident mitigation capabilities. A detailed failure modes and effects analysis is presented in Table 6.2.3-3.
| |
| The functional analyses conducted on the ABGTS have shown that:
| |
| (1) The air intakes for the system are properly located to minimize accident effects. The use of the air intakes provided in the fuel handling and waste disposal areas minimizes the spread of airborne contamination that may be accidentally released at these positions in which the probability of an accidental release, e.g., a fuel handling accident, is more likely. This localization effect is provided without reducing the effectiveness of the system to cope with multiple activity released throughout the ABSCE that may occur during a LOCA. Such coverage is accomplished by utilizing the normal ventilation ducting to draw outside air inleakage from any point along the secondary containment enclosure to the fuel handling and waste disposal areas.
| |
| (2) Accident indication signals are utilized to bring the ABGTS into operation to assure that the system functions when needed to mitigate accident effects.
| |
| Accidents in which this system is needed to preserve safety are automatically detected by at least one of the three instrumentation sets used to generate accident signals that result in system startup.
| |
| (3) System startup reliability is very high. The practice of allowing the automatic startup of either, or both, full capacity trains in the system gives greater assurance that one train of equipment functions upon receipt of an accident signal.
| |
| Design Evaluation 6.2.3-19
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 (4) The method adopted to establish and keep the negative pressure level within this secondary containment enclosure minimizes the time needed to reach the desired pressure level. Initially, the full capacity of the ABGTS fans is utilized for this purpose. After reaching the desired operating level, the system control module allows outside air to enter the air flow network just upstream of the fan at a rate to keep the fans operating at full capacity with the enclosed volume at the desired negative pressure level. In this situation, the amount of air withdrawn from the enclosed volume is equal to the amount of outside air inleakage through the ABSCE. In addition, two vacuum breaker dampers in series are provided to admit outside air in case the modulating dampers fail.
| |
| (5) The ABSCE is maintained at a slightly negative pressure to reduce the amount of unprocessed air escaping from this secondary containment enclosure to the atmosphere to insignificant quantities. In addition, this negative pressure level is less than that which is maintained within the annulus; such that, any air leakage between the Auxiliary Building and the Shield Building is from the Auxiliary Building into the Shield Building.
| |
| (6) The Train A and Train B air cleanup units are sufficiently separated from each other to eliminate the possibility of a single failure destroying the capability to process Auxiliary Building air prior to its release to the atmosphere. Two concrete walls and a distance of more than 80 feet separate the two trains.
| |
| The use of separate trains of the emergency power system to drive the air cleanup trains gives further assurance of proper equipment separation.
| |
| During periods when the primary containment and annulus of a unit are open to the Auxiliary Building, the ABSCE also includes the primary containment and the annulus of that unit. During this condition, which exists during the construction phase of Unit 2 and certain shutdown and refueling operations, operator action is taken to ensure that the purge air ventilation system is shutdown.
| |
| The review of the ABGTS conducted to determine its conformance with Regulatory Guide 1.52 has shown that this system, designed prior to issuance of the guide, is in general agreement with its requirements. Details on compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.52 are given in Table 6.5-2.
| |
| The performance analysis conducted to verify that the ABGTS has the required accident mitigation capabilities has shown that the system flow rate is sized properly to handle all expected outside air inleakage at a 1/4 inch water gauge negative pressure differential. This indicates that the nominal flow rate of 9000 cfm is sufficient to assure an adequate margin above the expected ABSCE inleakage (ACU filters are replaced as needed to maintain a minimum flow capability of 9300 cfm under surveillance instructions).
| |
| The performance analysis evaluated the capability of the ABGTS to reach and maintain a negative pressure of 1/4 inch water gauge with respect to the outside within the boundaries of the ABSCE. The following was utilized in the analysis:
| |
| 6.2.3-20 Design Evaluation
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 (1) Leakage into the ABSCE is proportional to the square root of the pressure differential, and is 7930 cfm maximum at a negative differential pressure of 1/4 inch water gauge.
| |
| (2) Only one air cleanup unit in the ABGTS operates at the rated capacity.
| |
| (3) The air cleanup unit fan begins to operate 30 seconds after initiation of the postulated LOCA.
| |
| (4) The initial static pressure inside the ABSCE is conservatively considered to be atmospheric pressure, although the ABSCE is under a negative pressure during normal operation.
| |
| (5) The effective pressure head due to wind equals 1/8 inch water gauge.
| |
| (6) Initial average air temperature inside the ABSCE equals 104°F.
| |
| (7) Atmospheric temperature and pressure are 95°F and 14.4 psia, respectively.
| |
| (8) ABSCE isolation dampers/valves close within 30 seconds after receiving an ABI or a high radiation signal, except for the fuel handling area exhaust dampers which must close within 11.7 seconds. The non-safety-related general ventilation and fuel handling area exhaust fans are designed to shut down automatically following a LOCA. Each fan is provided with a safety related Class 1E primary circuit breaker and a safety related Class 1E shunt trip isolation switch which is tripped by a signal of the opposite train from that for the primary circuit breaker to ensure that power is isolated from the fan.
| |
| The analysis utilizes the first law of thermodynamics and perfect gas relations in an iterative approach to determine temperature and pressure changes in the ABSCE.
| |
| Heat sources and sinks (ESF equipment room coolers) are considered.
| |
| The results obtained indicate that the ABGTS has the capability to reach and maintain a negative pressure differential of 3 inch water gauge within four minutes of the receipt of an Auxiliary Building isolation signal.
| |
| The system contains sufficient air cleanup facilities to keep the contributions to the site boundary and LPZ dosage arising from Auxiliary Building air releases to small fractions of the 10 CFR 100 guideline values. This part of the analysis is presented and evaluated in Chapter 15.
| |
| 6.2.3.4 Test and Inspections 6.2.3.4.1 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS)
| |
| Preoperational testing of the EGTS is conducted to verify that the Shield Building and the EGTS have the capabilities needed to keep LOCA generated activity releases from the affected reactor unit at or below limits specified in 10 CFR 100. Included in the scope of testing are functional tests on all system instrumentation, controls, and alarms. The tests are structured to accomplish the following:
| |
| Test and Inspections 6.2.3-21
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 (1) Verification that Shield Building infiltration is less than or equal to the design value at the design negative pressure level for post-accident conditions.
| |
| (2) Verification of the system capability to establish and maintain the proper negative pressure level in the annulus.
| |
| (3) Verification that the air cleanup units meet requirements specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52. Refer to Section 6.5.1.4.1 for further information related to tests applicable to the air cleanup units.
| |
| (4) Verification of proper operation of all system components, instrumentation, alarms, and data displays.
| |
| The periodic test program for the EGTS fans and air cleanup units is described in the Technical Specifications. A periodic test is performed once every 18 months to verify that the EGTS can maintain the annulus at a negative pressure within the instrument deadband immediately above and below the nominal design value. This test also verifies that the Shield Building inleakage rate to the annulus is less than or equal to 250 cfm at the nominal design value. A verification of system flow capacity and Shield Building inleakage rates at the specified negative pressure is adequate to confirm that the calculated depressurization time is conservative. The EGTS fans start within 30 seconds following the initiation of a containment isolation phase A signal.
| |
| 6.2.3.4.2 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS)
| |
| Preoperational testing of the ABGTS is conducted to verify that the ABGTS has the capabilities needed to reduce radioactive releases from the ABSCE to the environment during an accident to levels sufficiently low to keep the site boundary dose rates below the requirements of 10 CFR 100. Included in the test scope are functional tests on all system instrumentation, controls, and alarms. The tests are structured to accomplish the following:
| |
| (1) Verify the startup and control capabilities of the system, considering a single operating component failure.
| |
| (2) Verify the capability of the air flow control modules to create and maintain a negative pressure within the ABSCE.
| |
| (3) Verify that ABSCE infiltration is less than or equal to the design value at the design negative pressure level considering a postulated failure of a non-safety related component.
| |
| (4) Verify that the air cleanup units meet requirements specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52. Refer to Section 6.5.1.4.2 for further information related to tests applicable to the air cleanup units.
| |
| The periodic test program for the ABGTS fans and air cleanup units is described in the Technical Specifications. A periodic test is performed to verify that the ABGTS can maintain the ABSCE at a negative pressure between -0.25 and -0.5 inches of water with respect to atmospheric pressure. This test also verifies that the ABSCE inleakage 6.2.3-22 Test and Inspections
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 rate is less than or equal to 7930 cfm while the ABSCE is being maintained at the negative pressure described above. A verification of system flow capacity and ABSCE inleakage rate at the specified negative pressure is adequate to confirm that the calculated depressurization time is conservative.
| |
| 6.2.3.5 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.3.5.1 Emergency Gas Treatment System (EGTS)
| |
| The air flow control instrumentation requirements for the EGTS are described in Section 6.2.3.2.2. Instrumentation associated with the air cleanup units is discussed in Section 6.5.1.5.1. The logic, controls, and instrumentation of this engineered safety feature system are such that a single failure of any component does not result in the loss of functional capability for the system.
| |
| 6.2.3.5.2 Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System (ABGTS)
| |
| Instrumentation required for the air flow control modules and air cleanup units are discussed in Section 6.2.3.2.3. Instrumentation associated with the air cleanup units is discussed in Section 6.5.1.5.2. The logic, controls, and instrumentation of this engineered safety feature system are such that a single failure of any component does not result in the loss of functional capability for the system.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.3-23
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.3-1 Dual Containment Characteristics (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| I. Secondary Containment Design Information Shield Bldg. ABSCE A. Free Volume (ft3) 3.96 x 105 6.9 x 106 B. Pressure (in. wg)#
| |
| Normal Operation -5.0 -0.25 Post-Accident -0.5 -0.25 C. Leak Rate at Post-Accident Pressure
| |
| (%/day) 91 165.5 D. Exhaust Fans Normal Operation Number 4 (2/reactor unit)* 6**
| |
| Type centrifugal centrifugal Post-Accident Operation Number Type 2*** 2****
| |
| centrifugal centrifugal E. Filters: Refer to Table 6.5-5 II. Transient Analysis A. Initial Conditions
| |
| : 1. Pressure = 14.4 psig
| |
| : 2. Annulus temperature = 50°F
| |
| : 3. Outside air temperature = 0°F
| |
| : 4. Thickness of secondary containment wall = 36 in.
| |
| : 5. Thickness of steel containment vessel = ranging from 0.8125 to 1.50 inches
| |
| *Annulus vacuum control subsystem
| |
| **Auxiliary Building general exhaust (2/unit) and fuel handling area exhaust (2)
| |
| ***EGTS
| |
| ****ABGTS
| |
| #Due to instrument locations and inaccuracies, the actual setpoints are more negative than the required values shown.
| |
| 6.2.3-24 Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.3-1 Dual Containment Characteristics (Page 2 of 2)
| |
| II. Transient Analysis (continued)
| |
| B. Thermal Characteristics
| |
| : 1. Primary containment wall
| |
| : a. Total expansion = 2000 ft3 Pressure expansion = 766 ft3 Temperature expansion = 1234 ft3
| |
| : b. Thermal conductivity = 31 Btu/hr-ft-°F
| |
| : c. Heat capacity = 0.111 Btu/lb-°F
| |
| : 2. Secondary containment wall
| |
| : a. Thermal conductivity = 1.6 Btu/hr-ft-°F
| |
| : b. Heat capacity = 0.22 Btu/lb-°F
| |
| : 3. Heat transfer coefficients
| |
| : a. Primary containment atmosphere to primary containment wall = 400 Btu/hr-ft2-°F
| |
| : b. Primary containment wall to secondary containment atmosphere = 0.19 (T)1/3 Btu/hr-ft2-°F
| |
| : c. Secondary containment wall to secondary containment atmosphere = 0.19 (T)1/3 Btu/hr-ft2-°F
| |
| : d. Primary containment emissivity = 0.90
| |
| : e. Secondary containment emissivity = 0.90 Instrumentation Requirements 6.2.3-25
| |
| | |
| 6.2.3-26 WATTS BAR Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Gas Treatment System (Page 1 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 1. EGTS ACU Draws air from annulus No flow or low Fan failure Low flow alarm in Loss of flow through Momentary reduction Redundant fan starts on Fans (2) to maintain negative flow on one fan and/or dirty filters the MCR the affected EGTS in exhaust from the low flow signal from failed A-A & B-B pressure in the train annulus fan and train.
| |
| annulus during design basis events
| |
| : 2. EGTS ACU (2) Filter air to remove Filters leak Defective filters High radiation None None High radiation levels are A-A & B-B airborne particulates levels indicated in indicated in the MCR and and vapors from the the MCR from the operator should start annulus of the affected shield building the redundant ACU. In reactor during design exhaust vent addition, periodic testing of basis events EGTS ACUs is conducted in accordance with R.G. 1.52 to verify leak tightness of HEPA and charcoal bank efficiencies.
| |
| : 3. Containment Isolate annulus Open Valve failure Valve position Lose one of two None Redundant valve in series annulus vacuum vacuum control fans indicating light in redundant valves in with failed valve provides fan isolation from EGTS during the MCR series isolation function.
| |
| valves (4) 1- ACU operation FCV-65-52 1-FCV-65-53 2-FCV-65-4 2-FCV-65-5
| |
| : 4. B train isolation Provide decay heat Open when ACU Valve failure Valve position Parallel flow path to None Additional flow path is valves (2) at removal cooling flow A-A is in operation indicating light in ACU A-A is open available which causes no Instrumentation Requirements EGTS Train A path for A-A ACU the MCR adverse effect.
| |
| suction when B-B ACU is 1-FCV-65-8 operating for Unit 1 Open when ACU Valve on Fan A-A (for Unit 1) (valve open by A-A is in stand-by Valve failure Valve position Negative pressure on None discharge side (0-FCV operator action) indicating light in ACU A-A by suction 24) closes when ACU A-A the MCR of ACU is in standby and will Fan B-B prevent backflow.
| |
| WBNP-85
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 2 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 4. (Cont'd) Closed when by- Valve failure Valve position See remark None Bypass cooling provision pass cooling is indicating light in the will not be used unless required MCR ACU fails and enough heat is generated by radioactivity which is collected on HEPA and charcoal adsorber to raise the charcoal bed temperature significantly.
| |
| Therefore, a second failed closed isolation valve need not be postulated.
| |
| 4a. 2-FCV-65-7 Same as Item 4 except Same as Item 4 Same as Item 4 Same as Item 4 Same as Item 4 Same as Item 4 Same as Item 4 except A-(for Unit 2) flow path is from Unit 2 except ACU A-A A becomes B-B and valve becomes ACU B-B on Fan B-B (0-FV-65-43) is and ACU B-B closed.
| |
| becomes ACU A-A
| |
| : 5. A train isolation Provide decay heat Open when ACU Valve failure Valve position Parallel flow path to None Additional flow path is valves (2) at cooling path for B-B B-B is in operation indicating light in the ACU B-B is open available which causes no EGTS Train B ACU when A-A ACU is MCR adverse effect.
| |
| suction operating for Unit 1 1-FCV-65-51 (for (valve open by Unit 1) operator action) Open when ACU Valve failure Valve position Negative pressure on None Valve on Fan B-B B-B is in standby indicating light in the ACU B-B by suction discharge side (0-FCV MCR of ACU Fan A-A 43) closes when ACU B-B is in standby and will prevent backflow.
| |
| Closed when Valve failure Valve position See remark on Item bypass cooling is indicating light in the 4 None Same as Item 4.
| |
| required MCR 5a. 2-FCV-65-50
| |
| * Same as Item 5 except Same as Item 5 Same as Item 5 Same as Item 5 Same as Item 5 Same as Item 5 Same as Item 5 except B-(for Unit 2) flow path is from Unit 2 except ACU B-B B becomes A-A and Valve becomes ACU A-A 0-FCV-65-24 closes.
| |
| WBNP-90 and ACU A-A becomes ACU B-B 6.2.3-27
| |
| * Valve 2-FCV-65-50 has been replaced with a steel plate to isolate Unit 1 operational boundary.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency 6.2.3-28 WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 3 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 6. Isolation valves (2) Isolation control valve. Closed when ACU Valve failure Low flow alarm and Momentary decrease None Redundant ACU Fan B-B at EGTS Train A It opens on a A-A is in operation valve position in flow starts on low flow signal suction containment isolation indicating light in from Fan A-A and Valve 1-1-FCV-65-10 (for signal so that EGTS MCR FCV-65-30 or 2-FCV-65-29 Unit 1) can exhaust air from opens. Fan starting signal the annulus of the is independent of valve affected unit. It also failure.
| |
| isolates Train A ACU during normal plant Closed when both Low flow alarm and Train B ACU continues to operation. Trains A & B Valve failure valve indicating light Momentary decrease None operate with either Valve ACUs are in in MCR in flow 1-FCV-65-30 or 2-FCV operation 29 open.
| |
| Valve position Flow Control Valve 0-FCV-Open when Train indicating light in the 65-24 and Backdraft A ACU is in Valve failure MCR Open back flow path None Damper 0-65-524 close standby to ACU A-A when ACU A-A is in standby and will prevent back flow.
| |
| 6a. 2-FCV-65-9 Same as Item 6 except Same as Item 6 Same as Item 6 Same as Item 6 Same as Item 6 None Same as Item 6 except A-(for Unit 2) flow path is from Unit 2 except A-A A becomes B-B and Valve becomes B-B 0-FCV-65-43 and backdraft damper 0 523 close.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNP-85
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 4 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 7. Isolation valves (2) Isolation control valve. Closed when ACU Valve failure Low flow alarm and Momentary decrease None Redundant ACU Fan A-A at EGTS Train A It opens on a B-B is in operation valve position in flow starts on low flow signal suction 1-FCV containment isolation indicating in the from Fan B-B and Valve 30 (for Unit 1) signal so that EGTS MCR 1-FCV-65-10 or 2-FCV-can exhaust air from 65-9 opens. Fan starting the annulus of the signal is independent of affected unit. It also valve failure.
| |
| isolates ACUs during normal plant operation. Train A ACU continues to Closed when both Low flow alarm and operate with Valve Trains A & B Valve failure valve position Momentary decrease None 1-FCV-65-10 or 2-FCV-ACUs are in indicating light in the in flow 65-9 open.
| |
| operation. MCR Flow Control Valve 0-FCV-Valve position 65-43 closes when ACU Open when Train indicating light in the B-B is in standby and will B ACU is in Valve failure MCR Open back flow path None prevent backflow.
| |
| standby. to ACU B-B 7a. 2-FCV-65-29 Same as Item 7 except Same as Item 7 Same as Item 7 Same as Item 7 Same as Item 7 None Same as Item 7 except B-(For Unit 2) flow path is from Unit 2 except B-B B becomes A-A and Valve becomes A-A 0-FCV-65-24 closes.
| |
| : 8. EGTS fan isolation Isolates EGTS fan Closed when Valve failure Low flow alarm and Loss of flow through None Redundant fan starts on valves from duct distribution EGTS fan is valve position the affected EGTS low flow signal from the 0-FCV-65-24 system when EGTS operating indicating light in the train affected train. Fan 0-FCV-65-43 fan is on standby MCR starting signal is independent of valve failure.
| |
| 6.2.3-29 WBNP-85
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency 6.2.3-30 WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 5 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 9. Shield building Open air path for One damper is Damper failure Damper position None None Damper in parallel flow exhaust isolation EGTS exhaust to be closed when indicating light in the path is open.
| |
| dampers discharged to either EGTS fan is MCR 1-FCO-65-26 shield building vent operating 1-FCO-65-27 and recirculated air (2-FCO-65-45) flow to either annulus (2-FCO-65-46)
| |
| : 10. EGTS inlet flow Senses flow to EGTS No signal Flow element Low flow is recorded None None These components are elements (2) and records flow in failure in MCR (see remark) not required for accident 1-FE-65-54
| |
| * MCR mitigation. They are (2-FE-65-3) located in the system flow path to provide additional flow information to the operator. No control function.
| |
| : 11. Annulus Recirc. & Indicates air flow to False signal Flow element Flow indication in None None These components are Shield building outside or to the failure the MCR (see remark) not required for accident exhaust flow annulus ring header mitigation. They are elements
| |
| * located in the system flow 1-FE-65-84 & 85 path to provide additional 1-FE-65-78 & 79 flow information to the (2-FE-65-84 & 85) operator. No control (2-FE-65-78 & 79) function.
| |
| * Flow elements 1-FE-65-54, -78, -84, and -85 have been abandoned in place; flow elements 1 & 2-FE-65-79 have been deleted; flow indicators 2-FI-65-78, -84, and -85 have been deleted, hence making their associated FEs non-functional.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNP-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 6 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 12. Back draft Prevent backflow Stuck closed when Spring failure Low flow alarm in Momentary decrease None Redundant ACU Fan B-B dampers (2) through Train A ACU Train A ACU is in MCR for Train A in flow from annulus starts on low flow from 0-65-523 when Train B ACU is in operation and ACU Train A-A. Fan starting 0-65-524 operation Train B ACU is in signal is independent of standby damper failure.
| |
| Stuck closed when None Train B ACU continues to both Train A & Spring failure Low flow alarm in None operate and Train A will Train B ACUs are MCR for Train A be turned off by operator.
| |
| in operation ACU
| |
| : 13. Back draft Prevent backflow Stuck closed when Spring failure Low flow alarm in Momentary decrease None Redundant ACU Fan A-A dampers (2) through Train B ACU Train B ACU is in MCR for Train B in flow from annulus starts on low flow from 0-65-525 when Train A ACU is in operation and Train B-B. Fan starting 0-65-526 operation Train A ACU is in signal is independent of standby damper failure.
| |
| Stuck closed when Spring failure None Train A ACU continues to both Train A & Low flow alarm in None operate and Train B will Train B ACUs are MCR for Train B be turned off by operator.
| |
| in operation
| |
| : 14. Modulating Modulates EGTS flow Closed, open or Damper failure Dampers arming Loss of one of two None Redundant set of dampers (8) released to outside improper setpoint is not redundant sets of modulating dampers in 1-PCO-65-80 atmosphere to control modulation reached after 45.0 dampers parallel flow path 1-PCO-65-82 the annulus pressure minutes from receipt maintains the required 1-PCO-65-88 of Phase A isolation negative pressure in the 1-PCO-65-89 signal annulus.
| |
| (2-PCO-65-80)
| |
| (2-PCO-65-82) Pressure differential (2-PCO-65-88) is indicated in MCR (2-PCO-65-89) 6.2.3-31 WBNP-91
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency 6.2.3-32 WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 7 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 15. Isolation valves Isolates EGTS One valve closed Valve failure Valve position One of the two None Redundant flow path is (8) 1-PCV-65-81 ductwork from outside when EGTS is in indicating light in the parallel flow paths is available.
| |
| 1-PCV-65-83 atmosphere and ring operation MCR lost 1-PCV-65-86 header during normal 1-PCV-65-87 plant operation (2-PCV-65-81)
| |
| (2-PCV-65-83)
| |
| (2-PCV-65-86)
| |
| (2-PCV-65-87)
| |
| : 16. Isolation valves Valves open to remove One valve opens Valve or Valve position None None Valve normally closed; (2) 0-FCV-65-28A decay heat in the idle when bypass instrument indicating light in the fail-closed second valve 0-FCV-65-28B train ACU cooling is not in failure MCR in series maintains operation isolation.
| |
| Bypass cooling provision One valve closed Valve failure Valve position See remark None will not be used unless when bypass indicating light in the ACU fails and enough cooling is in MCR heat is generated by operation radioactivity collected on HEPA and charcoal adsorber to raise the charcoal bed temperature significantly. Therefore, a second failure (closed isolation valve) need not be considered.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements
| |
| : 17. Isolation valves Same as Item 16 Same as Item 16 Same as Item 16 Same as Item 16 See remark on Item None Same as Item 16.
| |
| (2) 0-FCV-65-47A 16 0-FCV-65-47B
| |
| : 18. Flow elements (2) Opens decay heat No flow when Instrument Valve position See remark on Item None Same as Item 16.
| |
| 0-FS-65-31A/B removal isolation decay heat failure indicating light in the 16 0-FS-65-55A/B valves to the operating removal cooling is MCR ACU when no flow is required WBNP-91 sensed at the idle ACU
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-2 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Emergency Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR Gas Treatment System (Continued)
| |
| (Page 8 of 8)
| |
| METHOD OF EFFECT EFFECT COMPONENT FAILURE POTENTIAL FAILURE ON ON IDENTIFICATION FUNCTION MODE CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS
| |
| : 19. Flow elements (2) Starts EGTS standby Loss of flow at the Valve or Redundant ACU Momentary decrease None Redundant ACU starts 0-FS-65-31B/A ACU unit upon loss of operating unit instrument starts in flow from annulus on low flow at the 0-FS-65-55B/A flow in normally failure operating unit.
| |
| operating ACU unit
| |
| : 20. Flow elements (2) Shuts off relative Spurious signal Flow element Low flow and Hi- Humidity heater may None The EGTS fan can be 0-FS-65-25A/B humidity heater on low failure temperature alarms stay on after EGTS stopped either by 0-FS-65-44A/B air flow and alarm in in the MCR fan stops operator action or fan MCR failure, which is a single failure. The other EGTS fan is available to function. The heater is controlled by temperature switches; therefore, the spurious signal of the flow element has no effect.
| |
| : 21. Flow elements (2) Opens decay heat No flow from Valve or Valve position See remark on Item None See remark on Item 16, 0-FS-65-25B/A removal isolation decay heat instrument indicating light in the 16 except second failure of 0-FS-65-44B/A valves on idle ACU removal cooling failure MCR valve or instrument need when high flow is bypass not be considered.
| |
| sensed at the operating unit 6.2.3-33 WBNP-91
| |
| | |
| 6.2.3-34 WATTS BAR Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 1 Auxiliary Building Deenergizes solenoid Signal fails. Train A vital ac bus MCR indication of Loss of None. Train A and Train B ABI initiating Isolation (ABI) valves to close failure; Relay VKA1 only one train redundancy in signals are derived from signal Train A associated dampers failure; Train A ABGTS fan starting ABSCE independent (train-separated) and establish AB initiating signal (Phase and one train of isolation and in qualified devices.
| |
| secondary containment A containment ABSCE dampers ABGTS until enclosure; stops AB isolation, high rad in closing. operator starts general ventilation refueling area, high Train A ABGTS fans; starts various temp. in Aux. Building manually from ESF room coolers; general supply duct) MCR, after starts ABGTS fans to failure. ascertaining that maintain negative Train B ABI pressure in the ABSCE signal is not and remove spurious.
| |
| contaminants from the ABSCE air prior to discharge to atmosphere.
| |
| Spurious Operator error, Unnecessary None.
| |
| signal. spurious initiating isolation of signal (initiating signals ABSCE and listed above). actuation of ABGTS.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 2 Auxiliary Building Deenergizes solenoid Signal fails. Train B vital ac bus MCR indication of Loss of None. Train A and Train B ABI initiating Isolation (ABI) valves to close failure; Relay VKB1 only one train redundancy in signals are derived from signal Train B associated dampers failure; Train B ABGTS fan starting ABSCE independent (train-separated) and establish AB initiating signal (Phase and one train of isolation and in qualified devices.
| |
| secondary containment A containment ABSCE dampers ABGTS until enclosure; stops AB isolation, high rad in closing. operator starts general ventilation refueling area, high Train B ABGTS fans; starts various temp. in Aux. Building manually from ESF room coolers; general supply duct) MCR, after starts ABGTS fans to failure. ascertaining that maintain negative Train A ABI pressure in ABSCE and signal is not remove contaminants spurious.
| |
| from the ABSCE air prior to discharge to atmosphere.
| |
| Spurious Operator error, Unnecessary None.
| |
| signal. spurious initiating isolation of signal (initiating signals ABSCE and listed above). actuation of ABGTS.
| |
| 6.2.3-35 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-36 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 3 ABGTS Exhaust Draws a portion of air in Fails to start or Mechanical failure; Indicating light in Loss of None. Handswitches for ABGTS Fans Fan A-A the ABSCE through an fails to run. Train A power failure; MCR. redundancy in ABGTS Fan A-A and B-B in the MCR should air cleanup unit (ACU) Train A ABI signal (HS ABGTS. B-B can normally be in the A-Auto position.
| |
| to remove radioactive in A-Auto). perform the On an ABI signal, both fans start contaminants and functions of and the operator may stop one fan discharge into the maintaining and place its handswitch in the shield building exhaust the ABSCE at P-Auto (pull-out) position. This vent to maintain a a negative mode of operation is expected to negative pressure in pressure and occur after 30 minutes of two fan the ABSCE relative to removing operation. During an ABI, the fan the outside. contaminants. in the P-Auto mode will start automatically on insufficient negative pressure in the ABSCE relative to the outside. An alarm is provided for the condition when flow is inadequate 45 seconds after fan start.
| |
| Starts Spurious Train A ABI See "Remarks" Vacuum relief None. Status monitor light and ind. light in spuriously. signal (HS in A-Auto); column. line dampers MCR provide indication to operator spurious low flow may open to that fan is running. However, if signal from Fan B-B prevent only one ABGTS train starts when after valid ABI signal excessive both fans are in A-Auto or if the fan (HS in P-Auto). negative in P-Auto starts, the operator pressure in cannot determine whether the ABSCE by signal is valid or spurious (no admitting detection of spurious operation).
| |
| outside air. This is acceptable since there is no impact on plant safety without a second failure (e.g., failure of a vacuum relief damper).
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 4 ABGTS Exhaust Draws a portion of air in Fails to start or Mechanical failure; Indicating light in Loss of None. Handswitches for ABGTS Fans Fan B-B the ABSCE through an fails to run. Train B power failure; MCR. redundancy in ABGTS Fan A-A and B-B, in the MCR should air cleanup unit (ACU) Train B ABI signal ABGTS. A-A can normally be in the A-Auto position.
| |
| to remove radioactive failure (HS in A-Auto). perform the On an ABI signal, both fans start contaminants and functions of and the operator may stop one fan discharge into the maintaining and place its handswitch in the shield building exhaust the ABSCE at P-Auto (pull-out) position. This vent to maintain a a negative mode of operation is expected to negative pressure in pressure and occur after 30 minutes of two fan the ABSCE relative to removing operation. During an ABI, the fan the outside. contaminants. in the P-Auto mode will start automatically on insufficient negative pressure in the ABSCE relative to the outside. An alarm is provided for the condition when flow is inadequate 45 seconds after fan start.
| |
| Starts Spurious Train B ABI Vacuum relief None. Status monitor light and ind. light in spuriously. signal (HS in A-Auto); See "Remarks" line damper/s MCR provide indication to operator spurious low flow column. may open to that fan is running. However, if signal from Fan A-A prevent only one ABGTS train starts when after valid ABI signal excessive both fans are in A-Auto or if the fan (HS in P-Auto). negative in P-Auto starts, the operator pressure in cannot determine whether the ABSCE by signal is valid or spurious (no admitting detection of spurious operation).
| |
| outside air. This is acceptable since there is no impact on plant safety without a second failure (e.g., failure of a vacuum relief damper).
| |
| 6.2.3-37 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-38 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 5 ABGTS Fan A-A Provides flowpath for Fails to open Mechanical failure. Loss of None. ABGTS Fan A-A Inlet and Outlet Inlet Damper ABGTS Exhaust Fan or stuck redundancy in ABGTS Fan Dampers 1-FCO-30-146A and 1-FCO-30-146B A-A. closed. ABGTS. B-B can 1-FCO-30-146B open on starting of perform the associated fan and close when the functions of fan stops.
| |
| maintaining the ABSCE at Spurious opening of Dampers a negative 1-FCO-30-146A and pressure and 1-FCO-30-146B when Fan A-A is removing not running is possible due to a contaminants. short circuit in control wiring.
| |
| However, it is not listed as a failure mode since the exhaust ducting of the two fans is not directly connected, making it very unlikely that a non-running fan would rotate in reverse due to spurious opening of its dampers.
| |
| 6 ABGTS Fan A-A Provides flowpath for Fails to open Mechanical failure. Loss of None. ABGTS Fan A-A Inlet and Outlet Outlet Damper ABGTS Exhaust Fan or stuck redundancy in ABGTS Fan Dampers 1-FCO-30-146A and 1-FCO-30-146A A-A. closed. ABGTS. B-B can 1-FCO-30-146B open on starting of perform the associated fan and close when the functions of fan stops.
| |
| maintaining the ABSCE at a negative pressure and removing contaminants.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 7 ABGTS Fan B-B Provides flowpath for Fails to open Mechanical failure. Loss of None. ABGTS Fan B-B Inlet and Outlet Inlet Damper ABGTS Exhaust Fan or stuck redundancy in ABGTS Fan Dampers 2-FCO-30-157A and 2-FCO-30-157B B-B. closed. ABGTS. A-A can 2-FCO-30-157B open on starting of perform the associated fan and close when the functions of fan stops.
| |
| maintaining the ABSCE at Spurious opening of Dampers a negative 2-FCO-30-157A and pressure and 2-FCO-30-157B when Fan B-B is removing not running is possible due to a contaminants. short circuit in control wiring.
| |
| However, it is not listed as a failure mode since the exhaust ducting of the two fans is not directly connected, making it very unlikely that a non-running fan would rotate in reverse due to spurious opening of its dampers.
| |
| 8 ABGTS Fan B-B Provides flowpath for Fails to open Mechanical failure. Loss of None. ABGTS Fan B-B Inlet and Outlet Outlet Damper ABGTS Exhaust Fan or stuck redundancy in ABGTS Fan Dampers 2-FCO-30-157A and 2-FCO-30-157A B-B. closed. ABGTS. A-A can 2-FCO-30-157B open on starting of perform the associated fan and close when the functions of fan stops.
| |
| maintaining the ABSCE at a negative pressure and removing contaminants.
| |
| 6.2.3-39 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-40 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 9 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-137 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate Fuel or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of Fuel FCO-30-138 (0-FCO-30-137) and Train B Handling Area Exhaust opens. in refueling area signal Handling Area provides (0-FCO-30-138) dampers, in Fan A-A and to failure; HS failure to Exhaust Fan isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from A-A. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 10 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-138 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate Fuel or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of Fuel FCO-30-137 (0-FCO-30-137) and Train B Handling Area Exhaust opens. in refueling area signal Handling Area provides (0-FCO-30-138) dampers, in Fan A-A and to failure; HS failure to Exhaust Fan isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from A-A. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 11 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-140 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate Fuel or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of Fuel FCO-30-141 (0-FCO-30-140) and Train B Handling Area Exhaust opens. in refueling area signal Handling Area provides (0-FCO-30-141) dampers, in Fan B-B and to failure; HS failure to Exhaust Fan isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from B-B. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 12 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-141 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate Fuel or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of Fuel FCO-30-140 (0-FCO-30-140) and Train B Handling Area Exhaust opens. in refueling area signal Handling Area provides (0-FCO-30-141) dampers, in Fan B-B and to failure; HS failure to Exhaust Fan isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from B-B. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-41 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-42 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 13 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-21 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-22 (2-FCO-30-21) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (2-FCO-30-22) dampers, in series, and 2B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 2 side of isolation and are provided with non-safety establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the control air and both dampers fail ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 14 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-22 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-21 (2-FCO-30-21) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (2-FCO-30-22) dampers, in series, and 2B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 2 side of isolation and are provided with non-safety establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the control air and both dampers fail ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 15 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-86 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-87 (1-FCO-30-86) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (1-FCO-30-87) dampers, in series, and 1B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 1 side of isolation and are provided with non-safety establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the control air and both dampers fail ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 16 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-87 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-86 (1-FCO-30-86) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (1-FCO-30-87) dampers, in series, and 1B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 1 side of isolation and are provided with non-safety establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the control air and both dampers fail ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-43 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-44 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 17 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-106 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-107 (1-FCO-30-106) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (1-FCO-30-107) dampers, in and 1B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 1 side of isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 18 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-107 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-106 (1-FCO-30-106) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (1-FCO-30-107) dampers, in and 1B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 1 side of isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 19 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-108 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-109 (2-FCO-30-108) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (2-FCO-30-109) dampers, in and 2B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 2 side of isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 20 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-109 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of part FCO-30-108 (2-FCO-30-108) and Train B Gen Supply Fans 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal of ductwork on provides (2-FCO-30-109) dampers, in and 2B-B and to failure; HS failure to Unit 2 side of isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from AB. maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-45 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-46 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 21 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-160 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-161 (1-FCO-30-160) and Train B Gen Exhaust Fan 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides (1-FCO-30-161) dampers, in suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 1A-A. isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 22 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-161 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train B (1-Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-160 FCO-30-160) and Train B (1-FCO-Gen Exhaust Fan 1A-A opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides 30-161) dampers, in series, are suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 1A-A. isolation and provided with non-safety control air boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the and both dampers fail closed on open to A-Auto. ABSCE. loss of control air. Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 23 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-166 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A (1-Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-167 FCO-30-166) and Train B (1-FCO-Gen Exhaust Fan 1B-B opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides 30-167) dampers, in series, are suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 1B-B. isolation and provided with non-safety control air boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the and both dampers fail closed on open to A-Auto. ABSCE. loss of control air. Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 24 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-167 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train B (1-Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-166 FCO-30-166) and Train B (1-FCO-Gen Exhaust Fan 1B-B opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides 30-167) dampers, in series, are suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 1B-B. isolation and provided with non-safety control air boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the and both dampers fail closed on open to A-Auto. ABSCE. loss of control air. Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-47 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-48 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 25 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-271 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-272 (2-FCO-30-271) and Train B Gen Exhaust Fan 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides (2-FCO-30-272) dampers, in suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 2A-A. isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 26 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-272 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-271 (2-FCO-30-271) and Train B Gen Exhaust Fan 2A-A opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides (2-FCO-30-272) dampers, in suction and to establish failure; HS failure to Fan 2A-A. isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 27 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-275 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-276 (2-FCV-30-275) and Train B Gen Exhaust Fan 2B-B opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides (2-FCV-30-276) dampers, in suction and Exhaust failure; HS failure to Fan 2B-B. isolation and series, are provided with non-Fan B-B and to spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers establish boundary for open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| ABGTS. Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 28 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 2-FCO-30-276 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 2- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate AB or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of AB FCO-30-275 (2-FCV-30-275) and Train B Gen Exhaust Fan 2B-B opens. in refueling area signal Gen Exhaust provides (2-FCV-30-276) dampers, in suction area and to failure; HS failure to Fan 2B-B. isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-49 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-50 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 29 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-294 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate Purge or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-30-295 (1-FCV-30-294) and Train B Air Supply Fan inlet opens. in refueling area signal Purge Air provides (1-FCV-30-295) dampers, in duct and to establish failure; HS failure to Supply Fan inlet isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from duct. maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 30 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-30-295 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate Purge or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-30-294 (1-FCV-30-294) and Train B Air Supply Fan inlet opens. in refueling area signal Purge Air provides (1-FCV-30-295) dampers, in duct and to establish failure; HS failure to Supply Fan inlet isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from duct. maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 31 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-122 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate the or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of cask FCO-30-123 (0-FCO-30-122) and Train B cask loading area opens. in refueling area signal loading area provides (0-FCO-30-123) dampers, in exhaust and to failure; HS failure to exhaust. isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 32 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-123 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate the or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of cask FCO-30-122 (0-FCO-30-122) and Train B cask loading area opens. in refueling area signal loading area provides (0-FCO-30-123) dampers, in exhaust and to failure; HS failure to exhaust. isolation and series, are provided with non-establish boundary for spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers ABGTS. open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 6.2.3-51 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-3 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-52 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 33 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-129 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate the or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of cask FCO-30-130 (0-FCO-30-129) and Train B cask loading area opens. in refueling area signal loading area provides (0-FCO-30-130) dampers, in supply and to establish failure; HS failure to supply. isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 34 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-30-130 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B signal to isolate the or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of cask FCO-30-129 (0-FCO-30-129) and Train B cask loading area opens. in refueling area signal loading area provides (0-FCO-30-130) dampers, in supply and to establish failure; HS failure to supply. isolation and series, are provided with non-boundary for ABGTS. spring return from maintains the safety control air and both dampers open to A-Auto. ABSCE. fail closed on loss of control air.
| |
| Independence of Train A and Train B isolation signals is discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE Instrumentation Requirements mitigation.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 35 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-31-350 rad in refueling area fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A signal to isolate PASF or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-31-365 (0-FCO-31-350) and Train B outside air intake and to opens. in refueling area signal PASF outside provides (0-FCO-31-365) dampers are in establish boundary for failure; HS failure to air intake. isolation and series. Independence of Train A ABGTS. spring return from maintains the and Train B isolation signals is open to A-Auto. ABSCE. discussed in "Remarks" under Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 36 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 0-FCO-31-365 rad fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 0- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B in refueling area signal or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-31-350 (0-FCV-31-350) and Train B to opens. in refueling area signal PASF outside provides (0-FCV-31-365) dampers are in isolate PASF outside failure; HS failure to air intake. isolation and series. Independence of Train A air spring return from maintains the and Train B isolation signals is intake and to establish open to A-Auto. ABSCE. discussed in "Remarks" under boundary for ABGTS. Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| 37 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train B Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-31-342 rad fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train A 125 Vdc power. Train A Train A in refueling area signal or spuriously Train A ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-31-343 (1-FCO-31-342) and Train B to opens. in refueling area signal PASF Room No. provides (1-FCO-31-343) dampers are in isolate PASF Room No. failure; HS failure to 1 exhaust. isolation and series. Independence of Train A 1 exhaust and to spring return from maintains the and Train B isolation signals is establish open to A-Auto. ABSCE. discussed in "Remarks" under boundary for ABGTS. Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety WBNF-90 function to open for DBE 6.2.3-53 mitigation.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-54 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 38 Isolation Damper Closes on ABI or high Stuck open, Mechanical failure; hot Status monitor light Loss of None. Train A Damper fails closed on loss of 1-FCO-31-343 rad fails to close, short in control wiring; and indicating light redundancy in Damper 1- Train B 125 Vdc power. Train A Train B in refueling area signal or spuriously Train B ABI or high rad in MCR. isolation of FCO-31-342 (1-FCO-31-342) and Train B to opens. in refueling area signal PASF Room No. provides (1-FCO-31-343) dampers are in isolate PASF Room No. failure; HS failure to 1 exhaust. isolation and series. Independence of Train A 1 exhaust and to spring return from maintains the and Train B isolation signals is establish open to A-Auto. ABSCE. discussed in "Remarks" under boundary for ABGTS. Items 1 and 2 of this table.
| |
| Damper failure to open is not listed since the damper has no safety function to open for DBE mitigation.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 39 Modulating Regulates the amount Allows more Train A vital ac power "Hi Press. in Aux. See "Remarks" None. See ABI signal stops AB gen supply Damper of outside air to outside air failure; Train A aux. Bldg." alarm. column. "Remarks" fans automatically. The Aux. Bldg.
| |
| 0-FCO-30-149 maintain ABSCE at than required control air failure; column. is designed for minimum leakage Train A negative pressure. (stuck open or spurious high dP and, with at least one ABGTS spuriously signal; failure of E/I or exhaust fan running, failure of the excessive I/P converter; modulating damper can cause opening). positioner mechanical pressure in the Aux. Bldg. to failure. approach outside pressure, but the AB pressure cannot become positive with respect to the outside.
| |
| The DPIS used for alarm in the control room is separate and independent from the DPIS used for modulating control of the damper. If the (non-safety) alarm functions, the operator can either close the associated Isolation Damper 0-FCO-30-280 or, if only one ABGTS exhaust fan is in operation, can start the redundant Does not allow None. Train B None. fan to maintain negative pressure.
| |
| the required Train A vital ac power Modulating amount of failure; Train A aux. Damper 0-FCO- Modulating Dampers outside air control air failure; 30-148 will open 0-FCO-30-148 and 0-FCO-30-149 (stuck closed spurious low dP signal to allow are provided with train-separated, or spurious from 0-FCO-30-149; sufficient safety-grade auxiliary control air.
| |
| inadequate failure of E/I or I/P outside air to opening). converter; positioner control the mechanical failure. negative pressure.
| |
| 6.2.3-55 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-56 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 40 Modulating Regulates the amount Allows more Train B vital ac power "Hi Press. in Aux. See "Remarks" None. See ABI signal stops AB gen supply Damper of outside air to outside air failure; Train B aux. Bldg." alarm. column. "Remarks" fans automatically. The Aux. Bldg.
| |
| 0-FCO-30-148 maintain ABSCE at than required control air failure; column. is designed for minimum leakage Train B negative pressure. (stuck open or spurious high dP and, with no air coming in and with spuriously signal; failure of E/I or at least one ABGTS exhaust fan excessive I/P converter; running, failure of the modulating opening). positioner mechanical damper can cause pressure in the failure. Aux. Bldg. to approach outside pressure, but the AB pressure cannot become positive with respect to the outside. The DPIS used for alarm in the control room is separate and independent from the DPIS used for modulating control of the damper. If the (non-safety) alarm functions, the operator can either close the associated Isolation Damper 0-FCO-30-279 or, if only one ABGTS exhaust fan is in operation, can start the redundant Does not allow None. Train A None. fan to maintain negative pressure.
| |
| the required Train B vital ac power Modulating amount of failure; Train B aux. Damper 0-FCO- Modulating Dampers outside air control air failure; 30-149 will open 0-FCO-30-148 and 0-FCO-30-149 (stuck closed spurious low dP signal to allow are provided with train-separated, or spurious from 0-FCO-30-149; sufficient safety-grade auxiliary control air.
| |
| inadequate failure of E/I or I/P outside air to opening). converter; positioner control the mechanical failure. negative pressure.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 41 ABGTS Vacuum Provides flow path for Fails to open, Mechanical failure; Indicating light in Aux. Bldg. at None. See Dampers 0-FCO-30-279 and Relief Line outside air. stuck closed, Train A power failure; MCR. more negative "Remarks" 0-FCO-30-280 are provided with Isolation Damper or spuriously Train A aux. control air pressure (lower column. train-separated, safety-grade 0-FCO-30-280 closes. failure; operator error absolute auxiliary control air. In addition, Train A (HS in wrong position). pressure) than there are two vacuum breaker required to dampers, 0-DMP-30-1128 and 0-prevent leakage DMP-30-1129 in series which will from outside. admit outside air into the Bldg in case of increasing vacuum.
| |
| Fails to close, Mechanical failure; None.
| |
| stuck open, or operator error (HS in Indicating light in None.
| |
| spuriously wrong position). MCR. Modulating opens. Damper 0-FCO-30-149 can independently control amount of outside air.
| |
| 42 ABGTS Vacuum Provides flow path for Fails to open, Mechanical failure; Ind. light in MCR. Aux. Bldg. at None. See Dampers 0-FCO-30-279 and Relief Line outside air. stuck closed, Train B power failure; more negative "Remarks" 0-FCO-30-280 are provided with Isolation Damper or spuriously Train B aux. control air pressure (lower column. train-separated, safety-grade 0-FCO-30-279 closes. failure; operator error absolute auxiliary control air. In addition, Train B (HS in wrong position). pressure) than there are two vacuum breaker required to dampers, 0-DMP-30-1128 and 0-prevent leakage DMP-30-1129 in series which will from outside. admit outside air into the Bldg in Fails to close, Mechanical failure; Indicating light in None. case of increasing vacuum.
| |
| stuck open, or operator error (HS in MCR. None.
| |
| spuriously wrong position). Modulating opens. Damper 0-FCO-30-148 can independently control amount of outside air.
| |
| 6.2.3-57 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-58 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 43 Train A Provides Class 1E Loss of or Diesel generator Alarm and indication Loss of None. Train A isolation dampers are not Emergency diesel-backed power inadequate failure; bus fault (Train in MCR. redundancy in Redundant directly affected since damper Power supply to active voltage. A); operator error. ABGTS exhaust Train B solenoids and control circuits are components of Train A flow paths. exhaust fan supplied either battery power or of ABGTS. can maintain battery-backed vital ac power.
| |
| required Loss of power to the damper negative control circuits does not result in pressure. loss of redundancy since circuits are such that isolation dampers fail closed.
| |
| 44 Train B Provides Class 1E Loss of or Diesel generator Alarm and indication Loss of None. Train B isolation dampers are not Emergency diesel-backed power inadequate failure; bus fault (Train in MCR. redundancy in Redundant directly affected since damper Power supply to active voltage. B); operator error. ABGTS exhaust Train A solenoids and control circuits are components of Train B flow paths. exhaust fan supplied either battery power or of ABGTS. can maintain battery-backed vital ac power.
| |
| required Loss of power to the damper negative control circuits does not result in pressure. loss of redundancy since circuits are such that isolation dampers fail closed.
| |
| 45 Fire Dampers Provide air flow path for Spurious Failure of fusible link. Low flow alarm. Loss of None. Spurious closure of either or both 0-ISV-31-3834 common duct between closure. redundancy in has the same effect.
| |
| and ABGTS fans. ABGTS. Low 0-ISV-31-3845 flow on 2-FS-30-157 will automatically start ABGTS Fan A-A if not running.
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements 46 Deluge System Floods the carbon Spurious Failure of fusible link. Loss of None.
| |
| adsorbers in event of actuation. redundancy in fire. ABGTS.
| |
| Opposite train ABGTS fan is independent and remains available.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued)
| |
| Instrumentation Requirements WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 47 Ductwork in the Provides containment Leakage. Cracks. Minimal None. Only small cracks are postulated ABSCE for air flow path. localized due to seismic qualification.
| |
| reduction of Minimal localized reduction of negative negative pressure will not affect pressure. the ABSCE.
| |
| Loss of fluid (air) is not a concern since the system is submerged in the same fluid.
| |
| 48 ABGTS Air Controls humidity of Fails to turn on Train A power failure; Hi rad alarm in MCR Loss of None. 1. Failure to cutout is not Cleanup Unit A exhaust air. or fails to temperature sensing for air to Shield redundancy in considered Heater operate. error. Bldg. vent. ABGTS. Failure in this table since this is the safe of heater will position for controlling air allow humid air humidity.
| |
| into carbon filter reducing its 2. Heater operation is tested every efficiency (see 31 days per procedure.
| |
| "Remark #2").
| |
| 49 ABGTS Air Controls humidity of Fails to turn on Train B power failure; Hi rad alarm in MCR Loss of None. 1. Failure to cutout is not Cleanup Unit B exhaust air. or fails to temperature sensing for air to Shield redundancy in considered Heater operate. error. Bldg. vent. ABGTS. Failure in this table since this is the safe of heater will position for controlling air allow humid air humidity.
| |
| into carbon filter reducing its 2. Heater operation is tested every efficiency (see 31 days per procedure.
| |
| "Remark #2").
| |
| 6.2.3-59 WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.3-4 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis for the ABGTS (Continued) 6.2.3-60 WATTS BAR ITEM FAILURE METHOD OF EFFECT ON EFFECT ON NO. COMPONENT FUNCTION MODE POTENTIAL CAUSE DETECTION SYSTEM PLANT REMARKS 50 Aux. Bldg. Provides flow path for Fails to open; Mechanical Failure Visual Aux. Bldg at None. This damper will only be used in vacuum relief outside air. stuck closed. more negative the event that isolation damper 0-damper 0-DMP- press. (lower DMP-30-279 and 0-DMP-30-280 30-1128 absolute press.) fail close. Therefore, for this than req'd to damper to fail close, and one of the prevent leakage isolation dampers to fail close at to outside. the same time would consititute a double failure.
| |
| Fails to close; Mechanical Failure Visual None. Vacuum None. See stuck open. relief damper 0- Remarks. Vacuum relief dampers 0-DMP DMP-30-1129 1128 and 0-DMP-30-1129 are can close installed in series.
| |
| independently and eliminate flow path from outside air.
| |
| 51 Aux. Bldg. Provides flow path for Fails to open; Mechanical Failure Visual Aux. Bldg. at None. This damper will only be used in vacuum relief outside air. stuck closed. more negative the event that isolation damper 0-damper 0-DMP- press. (lower DMP-30-279 and 0-DMP-30-280 30-1129 absolute press.) fail close. Therefore, for this than req'd to damper to fail close, and one of the prevent leakage isolation dampers to fail close at to outside. the same time would consititute a double failure.
| |
| Fails to close; Mechanical Failure Visual None. Vacuum None. See stuck open. relief damper 0- Remarks. Vacuum relief damper 0-DMP DMP-30-1128 1128 and 0-DMP-30-1129 are can close installed in series.
| |
| independently and eliminate flow path from Instrumentation Requirements outside air.
| |
| WBNF-90
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-90 Figure 6.2.3-1 Typical Mechanical Penetration Seaks Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-61
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNF-90 Figure 6.2.3-2 Typical Purge Penetration Arrangement Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-62
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-28 Figure 6.2.3-3 Typical Electrical Penetrations Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-63
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-28 Figure 6.2.3-4 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-64
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-49 Figure 6.2.3-5 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-65
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.3-6 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-66
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.3-7 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-67
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.3-8 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-68
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.3-9 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-69
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.3-10 Auxiliary Building Isolation Barrier Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-70
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-11 Reactor Building - Units 1 & 2 Flow Diagram - Heating and Ventilation Air Flow 6.2.3-71
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.3-12 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Logic Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment System 6.2.3-72
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-13 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Logic Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment 6.2.3-73
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.3-14 Powerhouse Unit 1 Electrical Logic Diagram -Emergency Gas Treatment 6.2.3-74
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-15 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment System 6.2.3-75
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.3-15-SH-A Powerhouse Unit 2 Electrical Control Diagram - Emergency Gas Treatment 6.2.3-76
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Secondary Containment Functional Design WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-16 Powerhouse Units 1 & 2 Auxiliary Building -Flow Diagram -Heating &Ventilating Air Flow 6.2.3-77
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.3-17 Post-Accident Annulus Pressure and Reactor Unit Vent Flow Rate Transients Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-78
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-18 Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Heating and Ventilating Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-79
| |
| | |
| Security-Related Information - Withheld Under 10CFR2.390 WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.3-19 Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Mechanical Heating and Ventilating Secondary Containment Functional Design 6.2.3-80
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2.4 Containment Isolation Systems The containment isolation systems provide the means of isolating fluid systems that pass through containment penetrations so as to confine to the containment any radioactivity that may be released in the containment following a design basis event.
| |
| The containment isolation systems are required to function following any design basis event that initiates a Phase A or Phase B containment isolation signal or releases radioactive materials into containment to isolate non-safety-related fluid systems penetrating the containment. The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant does not have a particular system for containment isolation, but isolation design is achieved by applying common criteria to penetrations in many different fluid systems and by using ESF signals to actuate appropriate valves.
| |
| 6.2.4.1 Design Bases The main function of the containment isolation system is to provide containment integrity when needed. Containment integrity is defined to exist when:
| |
| (1) The nonautomatic containment isolation valves and blind flanges are closed as required.
| |
| (2) The containment equipment hatch is properly closed.
| |
| (3) At least one door in each containment personnel air lock is properly closed.
| |
| (4) All automatic containment isolation valves are operable or are deactivated in the closed position or at least one valve in each line having an inoperable valve is closed.
| |
| (5) All requirements of the Technical Specification with regard to containment leakage and test frequency are satisfied.
| |
| Containment integrity is required if there is fuel in the reactor which has been used for power operation, except when the reactor is in the cold shutdown condition with the reactor vessel head installed, or when the reactor is in the refueling shutdown condition with the reactor vessel head removed. Containment isolation is not essential for design basis events, such as HELBs, outside containment which do not release radioactive materials into containment. The failure of containment isolation valves for such an event would not result in the release of radioactive fluids from inside containment.
| |
| In general, the containment isolation system is designed to the requirements of General Design Criteria 54, 55, 56, and 57 of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A. The following are alternate containment isolation provisions for certain classes of lines:
| |
| (1) Fluid instrument lines penetrating the containment are designed to meet the referenced General Design Criteria except for the pressure sensor and reactor vessel level instrumentation system lines. Instrument lines which penetrate containment are listed in Table 6.2.4-4.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (2) Remote-manual valves are used for isolation provisions on certain lines associated with engineered safety features (such as the ECCS) instead of automatic isolation valves.
| |
| (3) A closed system outside the containment is acceptable as one of the two isolation barriers if designed to the following criteria:
| |
| (a) Does not communicate with the outside environment (b) Meets Safety Class 2 design requirements (c) Withstands the internal temperatures and pressures which occur as a result of the containment design basis events (d) Withstands loss-of-coolant accident transients and environment (e) Meets Seismic Category I design requirements (f) Protected against missiles, pipe whip, and jet impingement.
| |
| (4) The isolation function of an engineered safety feature or system required to test an engineered safety feature requires one barrier to remain functional after the occurrence of a single active failure. Normally, this is accomplished by providing two isolation valves in series. If it can be shown that a single active failure can be accommodated with only one valve in the line and that fluid system reliability is enhanced by having one valve rather than two valves in series, then one valve and a closed system both located outside of the containment are acceptable. The single valve and piping between the containment and the valve are enclosed in a protective leaktight housing to prevent leakage to the atmosphere in the event of external leakage.
| |
| (5) Relief valves may be used as isolation valves in the backflow direction.
| |
| The criteria for the number and location of containment isolation valves in each fluid system depend on the valves functions and whether they are open or closed to the containment atmosphere or reactor coolant system. Four isolation classes of fluid system penetrations are defined as follows:
| |
| (1) Isolation Class I - Fluid lines which are open to the atmosphere outside the containment and are connected to the reactor coolant system or are open to the containment atmosphere. Each isolation Class I system has a minimum of two isolation valves in series. Where system design permits, one valve is located inside and one valve is located outside containment.
| |
| (2) Isolation Class II - Fluid lines which are connected to a closed system outside the containment and are connected to the reactor coolant system or are open to the containment atmosphere. Also included in isolation Class II are fluid lines which are open to the atmosphere outside the containment and are 6.2.4-2 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 separated from the reactor coolant system and the containment atmosphere by a closed system inside the containment. Each isolation Class II system has, as a minimum, one isolation valve.
| |
| (3) Isolation Class III - Fluid lines which are connected to a closed system both inside and outside the containment. Isolation Class III systems have, as a minimum, one isolation valve.
| |
| (4) Isolation Class IV - Fluid lines which must remain in service subsequent to a design basis event, such as lines serving ESF systems. Isolation valves on these lines are not automatically closed by the containment isolation signal.
| |
| Each isolation Class IV system has, as a minimum, one isolation valve (remote-manual operation).
| |
| The following design requirements for containment isolation barriers apply:
| |
| (1) The design pressure of all piping and connected equipment comprising the isolation boundary is equal to or greater than the design pressure of the containment.
| |
| (2) All valves and equipment which are considered to be isolation barriers and designed in accordance with Seismic Category I criteria shall be protected against missiles and jet impingement, both inside and outside the containment.
| |
| (3) All valves and equipment which are considered to be isolation barriers are designed, as a minimum, to ASME Section III Class 2 requirements except as noted in Item 1 of Section 6.2.4.2.1.
| |
| (4) A system is closed inside the containment if it meets all of the following:
| |
| (a) It does not communicate with either the reactor coolant system or the reactor containment atmosphere.
| |
| (b) It will withstand external pressure and temperature equal to containment design pressure and temperature.
| |
| (c) It will withstand accident temperature, pressure, and fluid velocity transients, and the resulting environment, including internal thermal expansion.
| |
| (d) It is protected against missiles, pipe whip, and jet impingement.
| |
| (5) A check valve inside the containment on the incoming line is considered an automatic isolation valve.
| |
| (6) A pressure relief valve that relieves toward the inside of the containment is considered an automatic isolation valve.
| |
| (7) A locked closed valve is considered an automatic isolation valve.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (8) To qualify as an automatic isolation valve, an air-operated valve must fail closed on loss of air, power, etc.
| |
| (9) All valves used for containment isolation will be capable of tight shutoff against gas leakage at containment design pressure.
| |
| The design bases for the containment isolation system include provision for the following:
| |
| (1) A double barrier at the containment penetration in those fluid systems that are not required to function following a design basis event.
| |
| (2) Automatic, fast, efficient closure of those valves required to close for containment integrity following a design bases event to minimize release of any radioactive material.
| |
| (3) A means of leak testing barriers in fluid systems that serve as containment isolation.
| |
| (4) The capability to periodically test the operability of containment isolation valves.
| |
| 6.2.4.2 System Design The containment isolation system meets the design bases presented in Section 6.2.4.1 with the exception of those cases which are discussed in detail in Section 6.2.4.3.
| |
| Containment isolation can be initiated by either Phase A or Phase B signals.
| |
| A Phase A signal is generated by either of the following:
| |
| (1) Manual - either of two momentary controls (2) A safety injection signal, generated by one or more of the following:
| |
| (a) Low steamline pressure in any steamline (b) Low pressurizer pressure (c) High containment pressure (d) Manual - either of two momentary controls.
| |
| A Phase B signal is generated by either of the following:
| |
| (1) Manual - two sets (two switches per set) - actuation of both switches is necessary in either set for spray initiation (2) High-high containment pressure.
| |
| 6.2.4-4 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Containment isolation Phase A always exists if containment isolation Phase B exists, when the Phase B signal is initiated by automatic instrumentation. Phase A containment isolation does not occur when the Phase B signal is initiated manually.
| |
| The instrumentation circuits that generate both Phase A and Phase B signals are described in Chapter 7.
| |
| The containment isolation system provides for automatic, fast, and efficient closure of those valves required to close for containment integrity following a design basis event to minimize the release of any radioactive material. Closure times for isolation valves are included in Table 6.2.4-1.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.1 Design Requirements Containment isolation barrier design includes the following requirements:
| |
| (1) As a minimum, containment barriers are designed to ASME Section III Class 2 requirements. This design meets the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.26 for the containment isolation systems, except that the four auxiliary feedwater lines incorporate safety-grade Quality Group C (ASME Section III, Class 3) valves outside containment for isolation. This has been documented in NUREG 0847 as acceptable to the NRC. All valves and equipment which are considered to be isolation barriers are designed to Seismic Category I requirements which is the intent of Regulatory Guide 1.29.
| |
| (2) All isolation barriers either inside or outside of the containment are protected against missiles, pipe whip, and jet impingement during a LOCA.
| |
| (3) All power operated isolation valves are tested for operability by the manufacturer and preoperationally after installation. Those automatic isolation valves with air or motor operators that do not restrict normal plant operation are periodically tested to ensure operability.
| |
| Additional design information is included in Table 6.2.4-1.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.2 Containment Isolation Operation A containment isolation signal initiates closing of automatic isolation valves in those lines which must be isolated immediately following a design basis event. The containment isolation valves will close within the time specified in Table 6.2.4-1.
| |
| However, on loss of ac power, the diesel will have to be started prior to closure. It is estimated that the time required to start the diesel is 10 seconds. The logic diagram for this system is shown in Figure 6.2.4-21.
| |
| Check valves are used under conditions where differential pressure will close the valves to maintain containment integrity. Lines which, for safety reasons, must remain in service subsequent to a design basis event are provided with at least one isolation valve.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Each automatic isolation valve required to operate subsequent to an accident is additionally provided with a manual control switch for operation. The position of these automatic isolation valves is indicated by status lights in the main control room.
| |
| Primary and secondary modes of valve actuation are shown in Table 6.2.4-1.
| |
| Redundant isolation barriers are used to prevent any single failure from causing an open path from the containment. If two power operated valves are used in series in a line for isolation purposes, one valve is supplied with one train of control and power and the other valve is supplied by the other train. Redundancy in power, signals, and barriers is provided to assume isolation.
| |
| Provisions for detecting leakage from remote manually controlled systems (such an the ECCS) include the use of pressure and flow meters, and inspection of the systems during normal plant operation. Details for leak detection are given in the appropriate system descriptions. Piping systems penetrating the containment have been provided with test vents and test connections or have other provisions to allow periodic leak testing (see Section 6.2.6).
| |
| The manufacturers of isolation system components perform tests to demonstrate the ability of mechanical and electrical components located inside the containment to perform as required in the containment environment following the design basis accident. Accident conditions which are considered in the design of isolation components are pressure, humidity, radiation, and temperature. Section 3.11 gives information concerning the environmental conditions used in the design of the containment isolation system including more detail on qualification testing of ESF components.
| |
| The description and design requirements for the instrumentation and control portions of the containment isolation system are discussed in Chapter 7.
| |
| 6.2.4.2.3 Penetration Design The penetrations are classified into 24 different types. These are shown in Figures 6.2.4-1 through 6.2.4-17E.
| |
| The locations of these penetrations through the steel containment and the Shield Building are shown in Figures 6.2.4-18 and 6.2.4-19, respectively. The penetrations are tabulated in Table 6.2.4-1. The different types of penetrations are discussed below and the various possible leakage paths, as tabulated in Table 6.2.4-1 and shown in Figure 6.2.4-20, are also described below.
| |
| Penetration Types I and II - Main Steam and Feedwater The main steam and feedwater line penetrations, shown in Figures 6.2.4-1 and 6.2.4-2, are the "hot" type in which the penetrations must accommodate thermal movement. Each "hot" process line where it passes through the containment penetration is enclosed in a guard pipe that is attached to the process line through a multiple fluid fitting. The guard pipe protects the bellows should the process line fail within the annulus between the containment vessel and the Shield Building, thereby precluding the discharge of fluids into the annulus. The inner end of the guard pipe is 6.2.4-6 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 fitted with an impingement ring which protects the bellows from jets originating from pipe breaks inside containment. In addition, the guard pipe for this type of penetration extends through and is supported by the crane wall. This avoids transmitting, loads to the containment vessel. Also, in the event of a pipe rupture it discharges fluid into the reactor compartment rather than smaller rooms outside the crane wall, thus preventing, overpressurization of these smaller rooms.
| |
| For each of these penetrations the penetration sleeve is welded to the containment vessel. The process line which passes through the penetration is allowed to move both axially and laterally. A two-ply bellows expansion joint is provided to accommodate any movement between the containment vessel and the Shield Building, under any conditions. The bellows is designed to withstand containment design pressure. When an embedded anchor is not utilized, a low-pressure flexible closure will seal the process line to the sleeve in the Shield Building, which will not impose significant stress on the penetration.
| |
| The flexible closure described above is located outdoors and serves to contain any leakage from the fluid head so that the leakage is routed back to the annulus, and to seal the annulus from the outdoors.
| |
| Guides and anchors limit movement of pipes such that design limits on the containment penetration and bellows are not exceeded during all conditions of plant operation, test, or postulated accidents.
| |
| Penetration Type III - Residual Heat Removal Pump Supply and Return The RHR pump supply and return penetrations, shown in Figure 6.2.4-3, are also the "hot" type. For these penetrations, the guard pipe does not penetrate the crane wall.
| |
| This type of penetration is anchored at the Shield Building wall in addition to being supported from the internal concrete structure to minimize loads transmitted to the steel containment vessel.
| |
| The Shield Building sleeves have embedded anchors and the fluid heads are in the Auxiliary Building. There is no need for low-pressure flexible closures as used in penetrations types I and II, since any leakage from the fluid head will be processed by the auxiliary building gas treatment system.
| |
| Penetration Types IV and V Types IV and V penetrations are also thermally "hot" with insulation and bellows, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-4. Any leakage through the fluid heads or through the bellow will be into the annulus and thereby processed by the emergency gas treatment system. The two types differ by only the weld ends.
| |
| Penetration Types VI, VII, and VIII Penetrations types VI through X and XIII through XVIII are "cold" penetrations.
| |
| For "cold" piping penetrations, a low-pressure flexible closure will seal the cold pipe to the sleeve penetrating the Shield Building. The piping configuration and supports on Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 either side of the penetration will be designed to preclude overstressing the containment vessel at the penetration under any conditions, including postulated accidents.
| |
| Relatively small thermal movement or stress is expected for the "cold" penetrations.
| |
| The clearance space provided for the pipe going through the Shield Building wall is computed by the summation of the relative movements of the pipe and the Shield Building for all design conditions. Ample clearance space is provided so that the pipe will not be in contact with the Shield Building sleeve under any condition.
| |
| Penetration types VI and VII have provisions for dissimilar metal welding. The two types differ in their weld ends only. Penetration types VI and VII are illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-5. The fluid heads of both types are located in the annulus.
| |
| Penetration type VIII is similar to that of penetrations types VI and VII, except that there is no dissimilar metal weld. Penetration type VIII is illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-6.
| |
| Penetration Type IX Containment Spray and RHR Spray Headers There is no difference between penetration types VIII and IX except that penetration type IX is located at the dome. Penetration type IX is illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-7. The flued heads are located in the annulus.
| |
| Penetration Type X - Multiple Line Sleeves Type X penetrations are primarily for instrumentation lines such as sampling and monitor lines. Typical multiple line sleeves are shown in Figure 6.2.4-8.
| |
| Penetration Types XI and XII - Emergency Sump During long-term post-accident conditions, containment sump water is recirculated through the RHR system and the containment spray system. The water collects on the floor of the containment and flows to the emergency sump. The water flows out of the containment through type III penetrations (two per unit) shown in Figure 6.2.4-9. Each line contains an isolation valve. The valves are enclosed in a valve compartment (two per plant unit). The valve compartments are designed for the same conditions as the containment except for leaktightness. The penetration between the valve compartments and the Auxiliary Building is a type XI penetration (two per plant unit) illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-10.
| |
| The type XII penetration has a flued head located in the containment sump. The outer sleeve (guard pipe) of the flued head is welded directly to the containment liner which is completely embedded in the concrete.
| |
| The type XI penetration has the flued head located in the Auxiliary Building. The penetration is insulated because of the hot sump water which would pass through it in the event of a design bases event.
| |
| 6.2.4-8 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Penetration Type XIII - Ventilation Heating and ventilation ducts utilize penetration type XIII, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-11.
| |
| Process lines are welded directly to these penetrations. Additional information on ventilation duct penetrations is given in Section 6.2.4.3.1 on possible leakage paths.
| |
| Penetration Type XIV - Equipment Hatch An equipment hatch fabricated from welded steel and furnished with a double-gasketed flange and bolted dished door is provided. A test connection to the space between the gaskets is provided to pressurize the space for leak rate testing, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-12.
| |
| Penetration Type XV - Personnel Access Two personnel air locks are provided. Each personnel air lock, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-13, is a double door welded steel assembly. Quick-acting type equalizing valves are provided to equalize pressure in the air lock when personnel enter or leave the containment vessel. The doors are sealed with double gaskets. A test connection to the space between the gaskets is provided to pressurize the space for leak rate testing.
| |
| The emergency air supply connection to the space between the double doors serves as a test connection to pressurize this space for leak rate testing. A special hold-down device is provided to secure the inner door in a sealed position during leak rate testing of the space between the doors.
| |
| The two doors in each personnel air lock are interlocked to prevent both being opened simultaneously and to ensure that one door and its equalizing valve are completely closed before the opposite door can be opened. Remote indicating lights and annunciators located in the main control room indicate the door is in operational status.
| |
| Provision is made to permit bypassing the door interlocking, system with a special tool to allow doors to be left, open during plant cold shutdown. Each lock door hinge is designed to be capable of adjustment to assure proper seating. A lighting and communication system capable of being operated from an external emergency supply is provided in the lock interior.
| |
| Penetration Type XVI - Fuel Transfer Tube A 20-inch OD fuel transfer tube penetration is provided for fuel movement between the refueling canal in the containment and the spent fuel pool. The penetration consists of 20-in stainless steel pipe installed inside a 24-inch carbon steel pipe, as shown on Figure 6.2.4-14. The inner pipe acts as the transfer tube and is fitted with a double gasketed blind flange in the refueling canal and a standard gate valve in the spent fuel pool. The inner pipe is welded to the containment penetration sleeve. Bellows expansion joints are provided on the pipes to compensate for any differential movement between the two pipes or other structures.
| |
| Penetration Type XVII - Thimble Renewal Incore instrumentation thimble renewal requires penetrations in both the steel containment and the Shield Building at the same elevation and azimuth. These are separate penetrations and are not connected in the annulus. The containment Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-90 penetration is illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-15. A similar seal is used on the Shield Building. Double O-ring gaskets and leak rate test connectors are provided for both the containment penetration and the Shield Building penetration.
| |
| Penetration Type - XVIII - Ice Blowing The ice blowing line penetration has a blind flange with an O-ring gasket inside and outside of the containment as shown in Figure 6.2.4-16. Sealing between the Auxiliary Building and the annulus is provided by a blind flange fitted with a gasket.
| |
| Penetration Type XIX - Electrical The electrical penetration assemblies provide a means for the continuity of power, control, and signal circuits through the primary containment structure.
| |
| Each assembly consists of redundant pressure barriers through which the electrical conductors are passed, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-17.
| |
| Each penetration assembly is sized such that it may be inserted into and be compatible with the penetration nozzles which are furnished as a part of the containment structure.
| |
| Unless otherwise specified, the assembly is designed to be inserted from the outboard-end of the primary containment nozzle.
| |
| The criteria and requirements for the design, construction, and installation of the modular type electrical penetrations conform to IEEE Standard 317-1976, "IEEE Standard for Electrical Penetration Assemblies in Containment Structures for Nuclear Fueled Power Generating Stations."
| |
| Penetration Type XX The feedwater bypass line penetrations, shown in Figure 6.2.4-17A are the 'hot' type in which the penetrations must accommodate thermal movement. Each 'hot' process line where it passes through the containment penetration is enclosed in a guard pipe that is attached to the process line through a multiple fluid fitting. The guard pipe protects the bellows should the process line fail within the annulus between the containment vessel, thereby precluding the discharge of fluids into the annulus. The inner end of the guard pipe is fitted with an impingement ring which protects the bellows from jets originating from pipe breaks inside containment. In addition, the guard-pipe for this type of penetration extends through and is supported by the crane wall. This avoids transmitting loads to the containment vessel. Also, in the event of a pipe rupture it discharges fluid into the reactor compartment rather than smaller rooms outside the crane wall, thus preventing overpressurization of these smaller rooms.
| |
| For each of these penetrations, the penetration sleeve is welded to the containment vessel. The process line which passes through the penetration is allowed to move both axially and laterally. A two-ply bellows expansion joint is provided to accommodate any movement between the containment vessel and the Shield Building, under any conditions. The bellows is designed to withstand containment design pressure. When an embedded anchor is not utilized, a low-pressure flexible closure will seal the 6.2.4-10 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-90 process line to the sleeve in the Shield Building, which will not impose significant stress on the penetration.
| |
| The flexible closure described above is located outdoors and serves to contain any leakage from the fluid head so that the leakage is routed back to the annulus, and to seal the annulus from the outdoors.
| |
| Guides and anchors limit movement of pipes such that design limits on the containment penetration and bellows are not exceeded during all conditions of plant operation, test, or postulated accidents.
| |
| Penetration Type XXI The ERCW lines and several component cooling water lines employ penetration type XXI, as shown in Figure 6.2.4-17B. Process lines are welded directly to these penetrations.
| |
| Penetration Type XXII The type XXII penetration is used for the multiple line nitrogen penetration. This penetration is shown in Figure 6.2.4-17C.
| |
| Penetration Type XXIII This type of penetration is used for the chilled water lines and each penetration contains a single chilled water line. The penetration is illustrated in Figure 6.2.4-17D.
| |
| Penetration Type XXIV Type XXIV penetrations are used for maintenance ports. These penetrations employ bellows as shown in Figure 6.2.4-17E. Any leakage through the flued heads or through the bellows will be into the annulus and thereby processed by the emergency gas treatment system.
| |
| The following codes, standards, and guides were applied in the design of the containment isolation system.
| |
| (1) 10 CFR Part 50 (2) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III (3) Regulatory Guide 1.26 (4) Regulatory Guide 1.29 (5) ANSI N18.2-1973 (6) IEEE Standard 317-1976 Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 6.2.4.3 Design Evaluation The containment isolation systems are designed to present a double barrier to any flow path from the inside to the outside of the containment using the double-barrier approach to meet the single-failure criterion.
| |
| When permitted by fluid system design, diverse modes of actuation are used for automatic isolation valves. In addition to diverse modes of operation, channel separation is also maintained. This also ensures that the single-failure criterion is met.
| |
| Adequate protection is provided for piping, valves, and vessels against dynamic effects and missiles which might result from plant equipment failures, including a LOCA.
| |
| Isolation valves inside the containment are located between the crane wall and the inside containment wall. The crane wall serves as the main missile barrier. Other missile barriers are discussed in Section 3.5.
| |
| The requirements and intent of NRC General Design Criteria 54, 55, 56, and 57 have been met with four exceptions.
| |
| (a) Primary containment monitoring instrument systems shall be designed to maintain the integrity of the containment isolation boundary in the event of a DBE. The instrument systems consist of pressure sensors (e.g., transmitters) located outside containment and associated sense lines that connect to the containment penetration nozzles. The sensors should be located as close as practical to the associated penetration nozzle. Any drain or test line used shall meet the double isolation barrier by use of two normally closed manual valves in series.
| |
| The instrument system shall be designed to Seismic Category I requirements and evaluated for effects of possible missiles, pipe whip, and jet impingement. Refer to Section 7.4 for exceptions to requirements concerning the use of remote-manual or automatic isolation valves.
| |
| (b.1) The reactor vessel level indication system (RVLIS) is required post accident for continual indication of the water level in the reactor vessel.
| |
| The capillary sensing lines which transmit pressure from the reactor vessel to instruments in the Auxiliary Building are armored and designed to withstand DBE conditions. Any containment isolation valves installed in the RVLIS capillary lines will jeopardize the performance of the system. For this reason, isolation of these capillary lines is accomplished by a sealed sensor located inside containment and an isolator located outside containment. These devices utilize a type of bellows which transmits pressure while preventing mixing of the fluids on either side of the isolation devices. The capillary line is armored 3/16-inch O.D. stainless steel tubing and is filled with demineralized water and sealed. A postulated shear of this capillary 6.2.4-12 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 line on either side of the containment would not allow a leak to develop through the containment boundary.
| |
| (b.2) The RCS wide range pressure transmitter (PT-68-70) is required post accident for continual indication of the pressure in the reactor vessel.
| |
| The capillary sensing lines which transmit pressure from the reactor vessel to instruments in the Auxiliary Building are armored and designed to withstand DBE conditions. Any containment isolation valves installed in the RCS wide range pressure transmitter capillary lines will jeopardize the performance of the system. For this reason, isolation of these capillary lines is accomplished by a sealed sensor located inside containment and an isolator located outside containment.
| |
| These devices utilize a type of bellows which transmits pressure while preventing mixing of the fluids on either side of the steel tubing and is filled and sealed. A postulated shear of this capillary line on either side of the containment would not allow a leak to develop through the containment boundary.
| |
| (c) Containment isolation for each RHR sump line penetration consists of:
| |
| (a) A closed system outside containment.
| |
| (b) A containment isolation valve outside containment in each of the two lines after the penetrating line branches in the RHR sump valve room. Both of these valves are remotely controlled from the main control room.
| |
| An enclosure of the RHR sump lines and isolation valves is provided from the containment out to and including the isolation valves. However, this enclosure is not designed to be leaktight after an accident for the following reasons:
| |
| (1) The maximum pressure which will be experienced inside the RHR sump line will only be about 25 psig.
| |
| (2) One of the isolation valves, the containment sump valve, is qualified to 600 psig. The other isolation valve, the containment spray valve, is qualified to 200 psig.
| |
| (3) This portion of the system only operates post accident and, therefore, only a limited leak passive failure need be postulated (and this would be at the valve). However, based on the above two statements and the fact that deadweight loading (i.e., normal operation) should not exceed the MELB criteria, the over-design should preclude any problem.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-13
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Thus, the penetration has such overconservatism in its design that an external leaktight enclosure around the valves is not necessary.
| |
| (d) The pressure boundary valve leak rate test line containment isolation valves (63-158, 63-112, 63-111, 63-167, 63-174, 63-21, and 63-121) are remote manually actuated from the main control room and do not receive a containment isolation signal. These valves are open for short periods of time during normal operation for the performance of SIS and RHR system venting. Thus, these valves do not automatically close when the containment isolation or safety injection signal is initiated during the venting of the SIS and RHR system. This exception is acceptable because administrative controls exist in the test document to assure valve closure after testing and containment integrity is not compromised during pump operation (i.e., during testing at accident conditions) since flow is being maintained into containment.
| |
| 6.2.4.3.1 Possible Leakage Paths Possible leakage paths from the containment are defined below. The leakage paths are defined on the basis that the annulus pressure is always less than outdoor ambient, the Auxiliary Building, and the containment pressures. Therefore, whenever containment is required, leakage is into the annulus. The possible leakage paths considered do not include containment leakage through the steel plates or through the full penetration welds in the containment vessels. The possible leakage paths also do not include shield building embedments. This is acceptable, as any leakage through any of these paths will be into the annulus and the leakage will be processed by the EGTS.
| |
| The more probable sources of containment and Shield Building leakage, such as elastomer seals, bellows, and through lines are considered as possible leak path types. Each penetration that contains elastomer seals or a bellows has at least one leakage path defined in Table 6.2.4-1. All penetrations not open to the annulus are considered as possible paths for through-line containment leakage and have one or more isolation valves. Thus every pipe penetration has at least one type of leak path listed in Table 6.2.4-1. The five different types of possible leakage paths are shown in Figure 6.2.4-20, tabulated in Table 6.2.4-1 and are discussed separately below.
| |
| Type A - Leakage Path Type A leakage is leakage from the Auxiliary Building into the annulus. Type A penetration leakage includes the following:
| |
| (1) Equipment hatch Shield Building sleeve leak (see Figure 6.2.4-12).
| |
| (2) Annulus access door leak.
| |
| (3) Ice blowing line Shield Building blind flange leak (see Figure 6.2.4-16).
| |
| 6.2.4-14 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (4) Containment purge supply and exhaust isolation valves outside Shield Building leak. The possible leakage is through the valves and the leakoff (see Figure 6.2.3-2) into the annulus.
| |
| (5) Shield Building penetration seal leakage.
| |
| Type B - Leakage Path Type B leakage paths are from the containment to the annulus. Type B leakage includes the following:
| |
| (1) Equipment hatch double O-ring through-line leak (see Figure 6.2.4-12).
| |
| (2) Ice blowing line O-ring and blind flange through line leak (see Figure 6.2.4-16).
| |
| (3) Penetration bellows leak.
| |
| (4) Containment purge supply and exhaust inboard and outboard valves through line leak. The leakage will pass through the leak off (see Figure 6.2.3-2) into the annulus.
| |
| (5) Containment thimble renewal line double O-ring through-line leak (see Figure 6.2.4-15).
| |
| Type C - Leakage Path Type C leakage is leakage from the out-of-doors into the annulus and includes the following:
| |
| (1) Shield Building thimble renewal line double O-ring through-line leak.
| |
| (2) Main steam and feedwater lines annulus seal leak.
| |
| Type D - Leakage Path Type D leakage path covers the through-line leakage from the containment to the Auxiliary Building (see Table 6.2.4-2). Included in this type of leakage are the lines associated with the safety systems required for post-LOCA operation, such as containment spray, RHR spray, high-head SIS, low-head SIS, SIS pump discharge, charging pump discharge, and containment emergency sump. For "closed" systems inside the Auxiliary Building, the through line leakage will stay within the closed system.
| |
| The component cooling water system is basically a closed system, except for the vent header at the surge tank. Any through line leakage into the Auxiliary Building through this vent will be processed by the auxiliary building gas treatment system. Radiation monitoring is provided as a signal to initiate the closing of the vent. The nitrogen supply lines to the pressurizer relief tank and to the accumulators are normally closed. The high pressure outside of the isolation valves serves to minimize through line leakage outward. The personnel lock is yet another possible source for through line leakage, but the leakage through the double O-ring (assuming one door open) is small, if any, and will be processed by the auxiliary building gas treatment system.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-15
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Type E - Leakage Path Type E leakage paths are paths from the containment that bypass the annulus and leak directly past a cleanup system. These leakage paths were considered during the design of the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant. The design features utilized at Watts Bar eliminates all type E leakage paths. This is done by the following methods:
| |
| (1) Portions of the Auxiliary Building are maintained at a negative pressure relative to the outside atmosphere for the duration of an accident. Section 6.2.3 describes the implementing system and its operation.
| |
| (2) Leakoff lines to the secondary containment and a third outboard valve receiving an isolation signal are used in certain lines (such as the containment purge lines) to prevent bypass leakage.
| |
| (3) A water seal at greater than peak containment accident pressure is used to prevent bypass leakage in certain lines (such as the safety injection pump discharge). The seals are available for at least 30 days after a design basis event (see Table 6.2.6-2b).
| |
| (4) The secondary side of the steam generator is kept at a higher pressure than the primary side soon after the LOCA occurs (see Section 10.4.9). Any leakage between the primary and secondary sides of the steam generator is thus directed inward to the containment.
| |
| Table 6.2.4-3 lists potential bypass leakage paths to the atmosphere and the methods chosen to eliminate such leakage.
| |
| 6.2.4.4 Tests and Inspections All components of the containment isolation systems were designed, fabricated, and tested under quality assurance requirements in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, as further described in Chapter 17. An alternative to visual examination during ASME Section III hydrostatic pressure testing was approved by Reference [1] for Unit 1 penetrations having inaccessible vender welds.
| |
| Nondestructive examination was performed on the components of the system in accordance with the applicable codes described in Section 3.2.
| |
| Subsequent to initial plant operation, containment isolation systems will be periodically tested under conditions of normal operation to determine that all systems are in constant readiness to perform the desired function.
| |
| Automatic isolation valves that receive a containment isolation signal to close, where closure of the valve will not limit or restrict normal plant operation, are periodically functionally tested by the on-line testing capability described in Section 7.3. All other valves are periodically tested for CIS circuit electrical continuity. Other testing information is provided in Section 6.2.6.
| |
| 6.2.4-16 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 REFERENCES (1) NRC Inspection Report Nos. 50-390/90-04 and 50-391/90-04, dated May 17, 1990.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-17
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.4-1 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Containment Penetration and Barriers DUE TO THE SIZE OF TABLE 6.2.4-1 IT IS LOCATED IN THE OVERSIZED TABLE FILE 6.2.4-18 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Page 1 of 6)
| |
| Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-2 A, B Personnel Access Hatch Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-3 Fuel Transfer Tube Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-15 Chemical and Volume Letdown Line Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-16* Normal Charging Line High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-17 RHR Return Line System is in operation after an accident. Cross ties between pumps maintain flows in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-19 A&B* RHR Sump Suction line Line is always filled with water. No atmospheric bypass leakage to the Auxiliary Building can occur after a LOCA.
| |
| X-20 A&B* SIS RHR Pump Discharge System is in operation after a LOCA. Cross ties between pumps maintain flows and pressure in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-21* Safety Injection Pump Discharge Line in use during a LOCA which will be pressurized even in the event of a single failure due to cross ties between pumps.
| |
| X-22* Charging Pump Discharge Same as for Penetration No. 21.
| |
| X-23 PAS Containment Air Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-24* SIS Relief Valve Discharge Any leakage through the relief valve is prevented as the valves are pressurized outside containment by the SIS system. Any leakage would be into containment.
| |
| X-25A Pressurizer Liquid Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-25D Pressurizer Gas Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-27 A, B, C, D Steam Generator Sample Lines Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| 6.2.4-19 WBNP-63 X-28 PAS Containment Air Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Continued) (Page 2 of 6) 6.2.4-20 WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-29 CCS from RC Pump Coolers Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-30 Accumulator to Holdup Tank Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-31 Fire Protection Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-32* Safety Injection Pump Discharge Same as for Penetration No. 21.
| |
| X-33* Safety Injection Pump Discharge Same as for Penetration No. 21.
| |
| X-34 Control Air I&C Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-35 CCS from Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger Same as for Penetration No. 29.
| |
| X-39A N2 to Accumulators Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-39B N2 to Pressurizer Relief Tank Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-40D Hydrogen Purge Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-41 Floor Sump Pump Discharge Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-42 Pressurizer Relief Tank Makeup Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-43 A*,B*,C*,D* To RC Pump Seals The line is pressurized during a LOCA even in the event of a single failure. If there was any leakage it would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-44 From RC Pump Seals Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems X-45 RC Drain Tank and PRT to Vent Header Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-46 RC Drain Tank Pump Discharge Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-47A Glycol Line to Ice Condenser Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| WBNP-63 X-47B Glycol Line from Ice Condenser Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Continued) (Page 3 of 6)
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-48 A&B* Containment Spray System in operation after a LOCA. A 30-day water leg seal is maintained in this line.
| |
| X-49 A&B RHR Spray System in operation after a LOCA. System pressure maintained even in the event of a single failure due to pump cross ties.
| |
| X-50A RCP Thermal Barrier Return Same as for Penetration No. 29.
| |
| X-50B RCP Thermal Barrier Supply Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-52* CCS to RC Pump Coolers Same as for Penetration No. 43.
| |
| X-53* CCS to Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger Same as for Penetration No. 43.
| |
| X-56A* Lower Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-57A* Lower Containment ERCW Return High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-58A* Lower Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-58B RCS Pressure Sensor Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-59A* Lower Containment ERCW Return High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-60A* Lower Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-61A* Lower Containment ERCW Return High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-62A* Lower Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a WBNP-63 single failure.
| |
| 6.2.4-21 X-63A* Lower Containment ERCW Return High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Continued) (Page 4 of 6) 6.2.4-22 WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-64 AC Chilled Water (ERCW) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-65 AC Chilled Water (ERCW) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-66 AC Chilled Water (ERCW) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-67 AC Chilled Water (ERCW) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-68* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-69* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-70* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-71* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-72* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-73* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-74* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems X-75* Upper Containment ERCW Supply High water pressure maintained on outboard valve, even in the event of a single failure.
| |
| X-76 Service Air Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-77 Demineralized Water Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| WBNP-63 X-78 Fire Protection Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Continued) (Page 5 of 6)
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-81 RC Drain Tank to Gas Analyzer Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-82 Refueling Cavity C-U Pump Suction Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-83 Refueling Cavity C-U Pump Discharge Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-84A Pressurizer Relief Tank to Gas Analyzer Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-84B Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-84C Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-84D Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-85A Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger to Boron Analyzer Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-85B Hot Leg Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-86A PAS Containment Air Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-86B PAS Containment Air Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-86C PAS Containment Sump Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-87B Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-87C Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-87D Reactor Vessel Level Indicating System Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-90 Control Air Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-91 Control Air Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-92 A, B H2 Analyzers Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| 6.2.4-23 WBNP-63 X-92C PAS Hot Leg Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-2 POSSIBLE BYPASS LEAKAGE PATHS TO THE AUXILIARY BUILDING (Continued) (Page 6 of 6) 6.2.4-24 WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetrating Line Name Description X-93 Accumulator Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-94 B, C Containment Atmosphere Radiation Monitor Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-95 B, C Containment Atmosphere Radiation Monitor Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-99 H2 Analyzers Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-100 H2 Analyzers Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-105 PAS Containment Air Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-106 PAS Hot Leg Sample Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-107 RHR Supply Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-108 Maintenance Port Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-109 Maintenance Port Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-114 Ice Condenser (to Glycol Cool FL Pumps) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| X-115 Ice Condenser (from Glycol Cool FL Pumps) Any leakage would be treated by the ABGTS.
| |
| * Not a bypass leakage path to the Auxiliary Building.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Table 6.2.4-3 PREVENTION OF BYPASS LEAKAGE TO THE ATMOSPHERE (Page 1 of 2)
| |
| Penetration Number Penetration Line Name Description X-4 Lower Compartment Purge Air Exhaust Leakoff lines to the annulus X-5 Instrument Room Purge Air Exhaust Leakoff lines to the annulus X-6 Upper Compartment Purge Air Exhaust Leakoff lines to the annulus X-7 Upper Compartment Purge Air Exhaust Leakoff lines to the annulus X-8A Feedwater Bypass Secondary side of the steam generator is pressurized above containment pressure X-8B Feedwater Bypass Same as for Penetration X-8A X-8C Feedwater Bypass Same as for Penetration X-8A X-8D Feedwater Bypass Same as for Penetration X-8A X-9A Upper Compartment Purge Air Supply Leakoff lines to the annulus X-9B Upper Compartment Purge Air Supply Leakoff lines to the annulus X-10A Lower Compartment Purge Air Supply Leakoff lines to the annulus X-10B Lower Compartment Purge Air Supply Leakoff lines to the annulus X-11 Instrument Room Purge Air Exhaust Leakoff lines to the annulus X-12A Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-12B Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-12C Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-12D Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-13A Main Steam Line Same as for Penetration X-8A X-13B Main Steam Line Same as for Penetration X-8A 6.2.4-25 WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-3 PREVENTION OF BYPASS LEAKAGE TO THE ATMOSPHERE (Continued) (Page 2 of 2) 6.2.4-26 WATTS BAR Penetration Number Penetration Line Name Description X-13C Main Stem Line Same as for Penetration X-8A X-13D Main Steam Line Same as for Penetration X-8A X-14A, B, C, D Steam Generator Blowdown Lines Same as for Penetration X-8A X-40A Auxiliary Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-40B Auxiliary Feedwater Same as for Penetration X-8A X-56A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Leakage prevented by combination of water seal and piping traps.
| |
| X-57A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-58A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-59A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-60A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-61A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-62A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-63A Lower Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-68 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-69 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-70 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-71 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A Containment Isolation Systems X-72 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-73 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-74 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-75 Upper Compartment ERCW Supply Same as for Penetration X-56A X-80 Lower Compartment Purge Air Supply Leakoff lines to the annulus WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Table 6.2.4-4 INSTRUMENT LINES PENETRATING PRIMARY CONTAINMENT (Page 1 of 4)
| |
| Inner Outer Line Isolation Isolation Penetration Size Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Line Identification No. Number Inches Orifice Number Type Location Number Type Location PAS Containment Air 1 X-23 3/8 No 43-319 Globe Inside Prim 43-318 Globe Annulus INTK LC Train B Containment Pressurizer Liquid 2 X-25A 3/8 No 43-11 Globe Inside Prim 43-12 Globe Annulus Sample Containment Containment Annulus 3 X-25B 1/2 No - - - - - -
| |
| P Sensor1 Containment Annulus 4 X-25C 1/2 No - - - - - -
| |
| P Sensor1 Pressurizer Steam 5 X-25D 3/8 No 43-2 Globe Inside Prim 43-3 Globe Annulus Sample Containment Containment Annulus 6 X-26C 1/2 No - - - - - -
| |
| P Sensor1 Steam Generator 7 X-27A 3/8 No 43-54D Globe Inside Prim 43-55 Globe Annulus No. 1 Sample Containment Steam Generator 8 X-27B 3/8 No 43-56D Globe Inside Prim 43-58 Globe Annulus No. 2 Sample Containment Steam Generator 9 X-27C 3/8 No 43-59D Globe Inside Prim 43-61 Globe Annulus No. 3 Sample Containment Steam Generator 10 X-27D 3/8 No 3-63D Globe Inside Prim 43-64 Globe Annulus No. 4 Sample Containment PAS Containment 11 X-28 3/8 No 43-N0030 Check Inside Prim 43-341 Globe Annulus Return Train B Containment 6.2.4-27 WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-4 INSTRUMENT LINES PENETRATING PRIMARY CONTAINMENT (Continued) (Page 2 of 4) 6.2.4-28 WATTS BAR Inner Outer Line Isolation Isolation Penetration Size Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Line Identification No. Number Inches Orifice Number Type Location Number Type Location Accum. to Holdup Tank 12 X-30 3/4 No 63-071 Globe Inside Prim 63-084 Globe Outside Shield Containment Building Annulus Pressurizer Relief 14 X-84A 3/8 No 68-308 Globe Inside Prim 68-307 Globe Tank to Gas Analyzer Containment Reactor Vessel Level 15 X-84B 3/16 No - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys Reactor Vessel Level 16 X-84C 3/16 No - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys Reactor Vessel Level 17 X-84D 3/16 No - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys Annulus Excess Letdown Heat 18 X-85A 3/8 No 43-75 Globe Inside Prim 43-77 Globe Exchanger to Boron Containment Analyzer Annulus Hot Leg Sample - Loops 19 X-85B 3/8 No 43-22 Globe Inside Prim 43-23 Globe 1 and 3 Containment Containment Annulus 20 X-85C 1/2 No - - - - -
| |
| P Sensor1 Annulus PAS Containment Air 21 X-86A 3/8 No 43-288 Globe Inside Prim 43-287 Globe INTK UC Train A Containment Annulus Containment Isolation Systems PAS Containment Air 22 X-86B 3/8 No - Check - 43-307 Globe RTRN Train A Annulus PAS Containment Sump 23 X-86C 3/8 No - Check Inside Prim 43-342 Globe RTRN Train A Containment Reactor Vessel Level 25 X-87B 3/16 No - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-4 INSTRUMENT LINES PENETRATING PRIMARY CONTAINMENT (Continued) (Page 3 of 4)
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems WATTS BAR Inner Outer Line Isolation Isolation Penetration Size Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Line Identification No. Number Inches Orifice Number Type Location Number Type Location Reactor Vessel Level 26 X-87C 3/16 No - - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys Reactor Vessel Level 27 X-87D 3/16 No - - - - - -
| |
| Ind Sys Hydrogen Analyzer 30 X-92A 3/8 No 43-207 Globe Inside Prim 43-435 Globe Annulus Train B Containment Hydrogen Analyzer 31 X-92B 3/8 No 43-208 Globe Inside Prim 43-436 Globe Annulus Train B Containment PAS Hot Leg 1 - 32 X-92C 3/8 No 43-251 Globe Inside Prim 43-250 Globe Annulus Train A Containment Accumulator Sample 33 X-93 3/8 No 43-34 Globe Inside Prim 43-35 Globe Annulus Containment Upper Compartment 35 X-95C 1-1/2 No 90-114 Globe Inside Prim 90-113 Globe Annulus Air Monitor 90-115 Containment Upper Compartment 36 X-95B 1-1/2 No 90-116 Globe Inside Prim 90-117 Globe Annulus Air Monitor Containment Lower Compartment 38 X-94C 1-1/2 No 90-108 Globe Inside Prim 90-107 Globe Annulus Air Monitor 90-109 Containment Lower Compartment 39 X-94B 1-1/2 No 90-110 Globe Inside Prim 90-111 Globe Annulus Air Monitor Containment 6.2.4-29 WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| Table 6.2.4-4 INSTRUMENT LINES PENETRATING PRIMARY CONTAINMENT (Continued) (Page 4 of 4) 6.2.4-30 WATTS BAR Inner Outer Line Isolation Isolation Penetration Size Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Valve Line Identification No. Number Inches Orifice Number Type Location Number Type Location Containment Annulus 40 X-96C 1/2 No - - - - - -
| |
| P Sensor1 Containment Annulus 41 X-97 1/2 No 30-134 Globe Containment 30-135 Globe Annulus P Sensor Hydrogen Analyzer - 42 X-99 3/8 No 43-202 Globe Containment 43-434 Globe Annulus Train A Hydrogen Analyzer - 43 X-100 3/8 No 43-201 Globe Containment 43-433 Globe Annulus Train A PAS Containment Air 45 X-105 3/8 No - Check - 43-325 Globe Annulus RTRN Train B PAS Hot Leg 3 - 46 X-106 3/8 No 43-310 Globe - 43-309 Globe Annulus Train B 1
| |
| These have no in-line containment isolation valves - see Section 6.2.4.3 and Table 6.2.4-1.
| |
| Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-1 Type 1, Main Stearn X-l3A, X-l3B, X-l3C, X-13D 6.2.4-31
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-32 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-2 Type II, Feedwater X-12A, X-l2B, X-12C, X-12D
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-3 Type III, Residual Heat Removal Pump Return X-17, Pump Supply X-I07 6.2.4-33
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-34 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-4 Type IV and V (Type IV Socket Weld Ends, Type V Butt Weld Ends)
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-5 Type VI and VII (Type VI for Socket Weld SS Process Lines, Type 6.2.4-35 VII for Butt Weld SS Process Lines
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-6 Type VIII, for Butt Weld C.S. Process Lines 6.2.4-36 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Figure 6.2.4-7 Type IX, for SS Process Lines Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-37
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-63 Figure 6.2.4-8 Type X, Instrument Penetrations 6.2.4-38 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-63 Figure 6.2.4-9 Type XII, Emergency Sump Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-39
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-63 Figure 6.2.4-10 Type XI, Emergency Sump 6.2.4-40 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-63 Figure 6.2.4-11 Type XIII, Ventilation Duct Penetration Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-41
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-63 Figure 6.2.4-12 Type XIV, Equipment Hatch 6.2.4-42 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-13 Type XV, Personnel Access Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-43
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-14 Type XVI, Fuel Transfer Tube 6.2.4-44 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-15 Type XVII, Thimble Renewal Line Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-45
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-16 Type XVIII, Ice Blowing Line 6.2.4-46 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17 Type XIX, Electrical Penetration Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-47
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-48 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17A Type XX Feedwater Bypass Penetrations X-8A, X-8B, X-8C, X-8D
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17B Type XXI, Upper And Lower Cont ERCW Supply And Return CCW From Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger and from Pump Odolers Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-49
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-50 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17C Type XXII Multi Line Penetration X-39
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17D Type XXIII Instrument Room Chilled H20 Supply and Return 6.2.4-51
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-17E Type XXIV UHI X-l08, X*109 6.2.4-52 Containment Isolation Systems
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-52 Figure 6.2.4-18 Mechanical Containment Penetrations Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-53
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-54 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.4-19 Powerhouse Reactor Unit 1 & 2 Mechanical Sleeves-Shield Building
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.4-20 Schematic Diagram of Leakage Paths Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-55
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-56 Containment Isolation Systems Figure 6.2.4-21 Electrical Logic Diagram Containment Isolation WBNP-63
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-65 Figure 6.2.4-22A through 6.2.4-22II Deleted by Amendment 65 Containment Isolation Systems 6.2.4-57
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.4-58 Containment Isolation Systems WBNP-42 Figure 6.2.4-23 Ice Blowing and Negative Return Lines - Blind Flange Details
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 6.2.5 Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5.1 The containment combustible gas control system is designed to control the concentration of hydrogen that may be released into the containment following a beyond-design-basis accident to ensure that containment structural integrity is maintained. The combustible gas control system of the containment air return system, the hydrogen analyzer system (HAS) and the hydrogen mitigation system (HMS) which conform to 10CFR50.44 requirements.Design Bases In an accident more severe than the design-basis loss-of-coolant accident, combustible gas is predominantly generated within containment as a result of the following:
| |
| (1) Fuel clad-coolant reaction between the fuel cladding and the reactor coolant.
| |
| (2) Molten core-concrete interaction in a severe core melt sequence with a failed reactor vessel.
| |
| If a sufficient amount of combustible gas is generated, it may react with the oxygen present in the containment at a rate rapid enough to lead to a containment breach or a leakage rate in excess of Technical Specification limits. Additionally, damage to systems and components essential to continued control of the post-accident conditions could occur.
| |
| The systems provided for combustible gas control have the following functional and mechanical requirements:
| |
| (1) The air return fans enhance the ice condenser and containment spray heat removal operation by circulating air from the upper compartment to the lower compartment through the ice condenser, and then back to the upper compartment. Hydrogen concentration is limited in potentially stagnant regions by providing air flow in these regions.
| |
| (2) The HAS provides the capability for extracting a sample and obtaining the measurement necessary to determine the volume percent concentration for hydrogen present in the sample. The system provides indication and alarms of volume percent concentrations in the main control room. Indication is also provided at the remote control center.
| |
| (3) The HMS is designed to increase the containment capability to accommodate hydrogen that could be released during a degraged core accident. The system is based on the concept of controlled ignition using thermal igniters.
| |
| (4) The air return fans and HAS are designed to operate continuously during accident conditions. The HMS igniter assemblies are qualified for a 30 year life of operational cycles.
| |
| (5) The combustible gas control system is designed for periodic testing and inspection.
| |
| Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 6.2.5.2 System Design Containment Air Return System Mixing of the containment atmosphere is accomplished by the containment air return system described in Section 6.8. The air return fans start automatically 9 + 1 minutes after receipt of a Phase B isolation signal. In addition, the fans may be started manually.
| |
| The associated ductwork, which must remain intact following a LOCA to assure that no localized hydrogen concentration exceeds 4%, consists of (1) two 12-inch ducts (one associated with each air return fan intake) which draw air from the containment dome region, (2) one 8-inch duct which circles the containment removing air from accumulator rooms and other dead-ended spaces and terminates at each air return fan housing, (3) two 12-inch ducts which circle the crane wall, removing air from the steam generator and pressurizer compartments and terminate through two 8-inch ducts at each air return fan housing, (4) two 8-inch pipes (one connected to each air return fan housing) which remove air from the refueling canal, and (5) the main duct between upper and lower compartment through the divider deck, including the non-return dampers.
| |
| The ductwork described above is embedded in concrete, where possible, to prevent damage from buildup of pressure during a LOCA. Ductwork not protected by embedment is designed to withstand the LOCA environment. The air return system also includes heavy-duty backdraft dampers to prevent back flow from the lower compartment to the upper compartment under a differential pressure of 15 psig. These dampers prevent steam from bypassing the ice condenser during the initial blowdown.
| |
| Figures 6.2.5-3, 6.2.5-4 and 6.2.5-5 are provided to show the routing of the recirculation ducts.
| |
| During the post-blowdown period, the pressure gradient between containment compartments is almost nonexistent and hydrogen can accumulate in potentially stagnant regions. The regions of concern are the ten dead-ended compartments: the four steam generator enclosures; the pressurizer enclosure; the four accumulator spaces; and the instrument room. The air return fans provide recirculation flow through the dead-ended compartments to prevent excessive hydrogen buildup. Each fan will mix 1,960 cfm form the enclosed areas in the lower compartment to the general lower compartment atmosphere.
| |
| Hydrogen Analyzer The HAS provides the capability to extract air samples from containment and to determine volume percent concentration of hydrogen. The primary functions of the system include continuous sampling from a remote location, measurement of hydrogen partial pressure, visual indication of volume percent concentrations and hydrogen concentration alarms in the main control room.
| |
| The sampling system consists of a single, non-trained detection loop. The analyzer is fed by one process sample line and returns to containment on one process effluent 6.2.5-2 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 line. This line is equipped with two manually controlled isolation valves on both the sample and return lines. The system is installed at two locations. The sample loop station, mounted inside the Annulus, consists of the detection chamber, pressure transducer, solenoid valves, condensate management components and check valves for directing sample through the loop.
| |
| The HAS remote control center is mounted is a mild environment in the Auxiliary Building where access is always permitted. The major components of the center include a PLC based signal conditioner/system controller, a remote touch screen display and the system switch panel.
| |
| Containment isolation valve hand switches, a hydrogen concentration indicator and alarms are provided in the main control room.
| |
| Upon actuation of the system, sample enters the loop assembly and passes through a T which separates the liquid and collects it in a condensate trap. The sample continues through a flow switch into the detection chamber. Inside the detection chamber, partial and total pressure measurements are obtained. The sample exits the detection chamber, passing through the sample pump which then drives the sample out of the loop assembly.
| |
| The analyzer is designed to continually measure hydrogen concentration following a beyond-design-basis accident. The analyzer is calibrated to measure hydrogen concentrations between zero and ten percent with an accuracy of +0.2% hydrogen. A sample loop flow diagram is shown in Figure 6.2.5-6.
| |
| The hydrogen analyzer components are seismically supported.
| |
| Hydrogen Mitigation System To assure that any hydrogen release would be ignited at containment locations as soon as the concentration exceeded the lower flammability limit, durable thermal igniters, capable of maintaining an adequate surface temperature, are used. An igniter developed by Tayco Engineering, operating at a nominal plant voltage of 120V AC, is used. The igniter has been shown by experiment to be capable of maintaining surface temperatures in excess of the required minimum for extended periods, initiating combustion and continuing to operate in various combustion environments.
| |
| The igniters in the HMS are equally divided into tow redundant groups, each with independent and separate controls, power supplies and locations, to ensure adequate coverage even in the event of a single failure. Manual control of each group of igniters is provided in the main control room and the status (on-off) of each group is indicated there. A separate train of Class IE 480V AC auxiliary power is provided for each group of igniters and is backed by automatic loading onto the diesel generators upon loss of offsite power. Each individual circuit powers two igniters. See Figures 6.2.5-8 through 6.2.5-12 for igniter locations.
| |
| Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 To assure adequate spatial coverage, 68 igniters are distributed throughout the various regions of the containment in which hydrogen could be released or to which it could flow in significant quantities (see Figures 6.2.5-8 through 6.2.5-12). There are at least two igniters, controlled and powered redundantly located in each of these regions. Following a degraded core accident, any hydrogen which is produced is released into the lower compartment inside the crane wall. To cover this region, 22 igniters (equally divided between trains) are provided. Eight of these are distributed on the reactor cavity wall exterior and crane wall interior at an intermediate elevation to ensure the partial burning that accompanies upward flame propagation.
| |
| Two igniters are located at the lower edge of each of the five enclosures for the four steam generators and the pressurizer, two in the top of the pressurizer enclosure and another pair above the reactor vessel in the cavity. These 22 lower compartment igniters help prevent flammable mixtures from entering the ice condenser. Any hydrogen not burned in the lower compartment is carried up through the ice condenser and into its upper plenum. Since steam is removed from the mixture as it is passed through the ice bed, mixtures that were nonflammable in the lower compartment tend to be flammable in the ice condenser upper plenum. This phenomenon is supported by the CLASIX containment analysis code which predicts more sequential burns to occur in the upper plenum than in any other region. Four igniters are located around the upper compartment dome, four at intermediate elevations on the outside of the steam generator enlosures, four more around the top inside of the crane wall and on above each of the two air return fans. The air return fans provide recirculation flow from the upper compartment through several dead-ended compartments (see Section 6.2.1.3.3) back into the main part of the lower compartment. To cover this region, there are pairs of igniters in each of the eight rooms (a total of 16 igniters) through which the recirculation flow passes. The location of the HMS igniters is shown in Figures 6.2.5-8 through 6.2.5-12.
| |
| The components of the HMS inside containment are seismically supported.
| |
| 6.2.5.3 Design Evaluation Containment pressure during the post blowdown phase of a loss-of-coolant accident is calculated with the LOTIC code which models the containment structural heat sinks and containment safeguards system. The long-term containment pressure analysis accounts for hydrogen partial pressure. This transient is discussed in Section 6.2.1 and 15.4.1.2.
| |
| The containment air return system is designed to reduce containment pressure after blowdown to prevent excessive hydrogen concentrations in pocketed areas, and circulate air through the ice condenser. The air return fans automatically start on a Phase B containment isolation signal and can be started manually. The fans provide a continuous mixing of the containment compartment atmosphere for the long-term post-blowdown environment. The system has redundancy, is single-failure-proof and will remain operable with al oss of onsite or offsite power.
| |
| The hydrogen analyzer is a highly reliable commerical grade. Category 3 instrument as defined in Regulatory Guide 1.97 and permitted by Regulatory Guide 1.7. The 6.2.5-4 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 system is capable of being energized and fully operational with 90 minutes. It is required to operate correctly and continuously following a beyond-design-basis accident.
| |
| The HMS, due to its igniter type and locations, redundancy, capability of functioning in a post-accident environment, seismic support, main control room actuation, and remote surviellance, performs its intended function in a manner that provides adequate safety margins. The Unit 2 containment structures can survive the effects of credible degraded core accidents when hydrogen hazards are mitigated by HMS.
| |
| 6.2.5.4 Testing and Inspections The combustible gas control system is subjected to periodic testing and inspection to demonstrate its availability.
| |
| The periodic test program for the containment air return system and the HMS are described in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| The periodic test program for the HAS is described in the Technical Requirements Manual.
| |
| Preoperational tests are described in Chapter 14.
| |
| 6.2.5.5 Instrumentation Application The instrumentation design details of the air return fans are shown on Figures 9.4-30 and 9.4-33. The logic, controls and instrumentation of this engineered safety feature system are such that a single failure of any component does not result in the loss of functional capability for the system.
| |
| The HAS instrument range is configured to measure from 0-10% hydrogen by volume.
| |
| There are two configurable hydrogen concentration alarms, one on the remote control center and one in the main control room. The HAS also provides a trouble alarm to indicate failures of the sensor and pump. An equipment status display monitors pump pressure and flow.
| |
| Annunciation is provided in the main control room upon loss of power or undervoltage to the igniters. Each of the two HMS groups is placed in service from the main control room by a handswitch. The igniters are manually energized following any accident which indicates inadequate core cooling. This is done without waiting for a potential hydrogen buildup.
| |
| Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 6.2.5-6 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 Figure 6.2.5-1 Deleted by Amendment 95 Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-62 Figure 6.2.5-2 De1eted By Amendment 62 6.2.5-8 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Combustible Gas Control in Containment WBNP-89 Figure 6.2.5-3 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 - Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning 6.2.5-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.5-10 Combustible Gas Control in Containment WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.5-4 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 Reactor Building -
| |
| Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR Combustible Gas Control in Containment WBNP-91 Figure 6.2.5-5 Powerhouse Reactor Building Units 1 & 2 - Mechanical Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning 6.2.5-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR 6.2.5-28 Combustible Gas Control in Containment WBNP-95 Figure 6.2.5-6 Function Flow Block Diagram - Containment Gas Monitor Subsystem
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 Figure 6.2.5-7 Deleted by Amendment 95 Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-13
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-95 Figure 6.2.5-7a Deleted by Amendment 95 6.2.5-14 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.5-8 Igniter Locations - Lower Compartment and Dead Ended Compartments Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-15
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.5-9 Igniter Locations - Lower Compartments 6.2.5-16 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.5-10 Igniter Locations - Upper Plenum and Upper Compartments Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-17
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.5-11 Igniter Locations - Dome 6.2.5-18 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 Figure 6.2.5-12 Igniter Locations - Elevation Combustible Gas Control in Containment 6.2.5-19
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-55 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 6.2.5-20 Combustible Gas Control in Containment
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 6.2.6 Containment Leakage Testing Primary containment leakage tests and containment isolation system valve operability tests will be performed periodically to verify that leakage from the containment is maintained within acceptable limits set forth in the Technical Specifications. The types of leakage tests are as follows:
| |
| (1) Test Type A Tests to measure the reactor primary containment overall integrated leakage rate. The containment leak rate test will be conducted in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
| |
| (2) Test Type B Tests to detect and measure local leaks of containment penetrations, hatches, and personnel locks as required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
| |
| (3) Test Type C Test to detect and measure containment isolation valve leakage as described by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
| |
| The leakage rate testing pressure for the above tests, Pa (as defined in 10CFR50 Appendix J), ha a nominal value of 15.0 psig with allowance for instrument error.
| |
| Exceptions to this test pressure are noted elsewhere in this section.
| |
| 6.2.6.1 Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test The maximum allowable containment leakage rate for the Watts Bar Nuclear Plant is 0.25 weight percent per day as specified in the Technical Specifications. The preoperational testing will be conducted in full compliance with 10CFR50, Appendix J as shown in Table 14.2-1. Subsequent periodic testing will also be performed in accordance with Appendix J. Periodic testing durations of less than 24 hours may be conducted when performed in accordance with Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-1, Revision 1, "Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants."
| |
| Prior to conducting the integrated leak rate test, those lines which penetrate primary containment are aligned as shown in Table 6.2.6-3.
| |
| The containment is then pressurized in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, and the Technical Specification requirements. When test pressure is reached, the containment is isolated from its pressure source and the following parameters are recorded at periodic intervals:
| |
| (1) Containment absolute pressure (2) Dry bulb temperatures Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-1
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 (3) Water vapor pressures (4) Outside containment pressure and temperature conditions During the test, ventilation inside the containment is operated as necessary to enhance an even air temperature distribution. The test data are processed at periodic intervals during the test to determine test status and leakage conditions. If it appears that the leakage is excessive, the pressure plateau is either maintained on the test or aborted to perform repairs. The test is run for a prescribed time period to obtain assurance of the leak test rate.
| |
| Following the leak rate test, a second leak rate is performed to verify the information obtained in the first test. This verification test consists of slowly bleeding off pressure from containment at a known rate and measuring the total containment leak rate. The superimposed, measured flow is adjusted to a value which causes a change in the weight of air in the containment that is in the same order of magnitude as the allowable leakage rate.
| |
| The total time equations or the mass point equations are used to determine the integrated leak rate. The mass point equations will be used for preoperational testing as discussed in Table 14.2-1.
| |
| 6.2.6.2 Containment Penetration Leakage Rate Test Table 6.2.4-1 lists penetrations in the primary containment. The Type B test is performed on all operational electrical equipment and personnel hatch, fuel transfer tube, thimble renewal, and ice blowing penetrations, and penetration bellows in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. The dual-ply bellows on containment penetration will be tested at Pa by applying the pressure between the plies. Airlock door seals are tested at 6.0 psig per Technical Specification requirements. Experience has shown that pressurizing the space between the seals to greater than 6.5 psig on personnel airlock doors of the design used at Watts Bar will lift the door and induce gross leakage unless strongbacks are used. Since the door seal test is intended to prove integrity of the seals, it is our position that a test conducted at 6.0 psig will conservatively demonstrate that seal integrity is maintained.
| |
| Table 6.2.6-1 lists all penetrations subjected to type B testing. Spare electrical penetrations will be subjected to Type B testing as they become operational. Tables 6.2.4-1 through 6.2.4-4 and Figures 8.3-44 and 8.3-45 give details on these penetrations. The test is performed in full compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
| |
| The acceptance criteria as required by Appendix J are specified in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| Table 6.2.4-1 lists containment isolation valves. Table 6.2.6-2a identifies those valves that are tested during a Type C test.
| |
| Isolation valves that are part of closed systems that are in use after a design basis event and valves that are water sealed for at least 30 days after a design basis event are not tested in the Type C test program. Table 6.2.6-2b lists the valves exempted 6.2.6-2 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 from type C leak testing. Bases for exemptions and exceptions from type C leakage rate testing on a penetration by penetration basis are as follows:
| |
| (I) Exemptions (1) Feedwater Bypass - X-8A, X-8B, X-8C, X-8D Feedwater - X-12A, X-12B, X-12C, X-12D Main Steam - X-13A, X-13B, X-13C, X-13D Steam Generator Blowdown - X-14A, X-14B, X-14C, X-14D Steam Generator Blowdown - X-27A, X-27B, X-27C, X-27D Auxiliary Feedwater, X-40A, X-40B These penetrations are directly connected to the secondary side of the steam generator. The main steam and feedwater lines of PWR containments are not required to be Type C tested (see definition of Type C test in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J). These lines are assumed not to rupture as a result of an accident (missile protected). Any leakage through these lines would be identified during operation by the leakage detection program. In addition, during a design basis accident, the secondary side of the steam generator is filled with water and would be at a higher pressure than the containment atmosphere thus preventing outleakage from containment. The integrity of the inside piping is also verified during the Type A test.
| |
| (2) CVCS Normal Charging Line, X-16 This penetration uses an inboard check valve and a closed loop outside containment (CLOC) as the means of containment isolation. Type C testing for this path is not required due to the seal pressure greater than 1.1 Pa and the 30-day water seal inventory as specified in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. A positive pressure preventing air outleakage is assured by the pressure applied against FCV-62-90 and FCV-62-91 (both of which receive a Phase A signal) by the high head SI pumps. Water testing for piping integrity is performed in accordance with ASME XI, IWV.
| |
| (3) RHR Hot Leg Injection, X-17 This penetration uses inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C testing for this penetration is not required since a continuous water seal will be provided at a pressure greater than 1.1 Pa and a 30-day water seal is provided, as specified in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. Testing is performed in accordance with ASME XI, IWV.
| |
| (4) RHR Cold Leg Injection, X-20A, X-20B Same as for X-17.
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-3
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 (5) SIS Hot Leg Injection, X-21, X-32 These lines make use of inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. These lines are postulated to be in-service post accident and the high head pumps will maintain a pressure seal greater than 1.1 Pa for greater than 30 days, as specified in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J.
| |
| (6) Charging Pump Discharge, X-22 This line makes use of inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C testing is not required for the same reasons as X-21 and X-32. Water seal is provided by the high head pumps.
| |
| (7) SIS Cold Leg Injection, X-33 Same as X-21 and X-32 (8) RCP Seal Injection, X-43A, X-43B, X-43C, X-43D These lines made use of an inboard containment isolation valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C test is not required for the same reason as given for X-16.
| |
| (II) Exceptions (1) Sump Suction to RHR, X-19A, X-19B These lines make use of a containment isolation valve located outside of containment and a CLOC for containment isolation boundaries. During a design basis accident, these lines would be submerged under water which would preclude air outleakage. In addition, these valves are exposed to Pa during each Type A test.
| |
| (2) SI Relief Valve Discharge to PRT, X-24 The line uses an inboard containment isolation valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries. The maximum calculated containment accident pressure per 10 CFR 50 Appendix J (Pa) during the design basis accident would not create a substantial outleakage driving force and, in any case, tends to cause the relief valves to seat rather than lift. The systems feeding this line are ECCS and, due either to operating pressure or static head, outleakage would be prevented. Therefore, no Type C testing will be performed for this line. However, this line is exposed to the Pa test pressure during the Type A test.
| |
| (3) Containment Spray, X-48A, X-48B and RHR Spray, X-49A, X-49B These lines make use of an inboard containment isolation check valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries of each line. Additionally, a water leg seal exists against a system valve outside containment in each line. This seal 6.2.6-4 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 prevents the outleakage of containment atmosphere. An inventory test is performed to ensure a 30-day seal water inventory at a pressure greater than 1.1 Pa, should one spray system shut down. The seal water inventory leakage rate test is performed in lieu of a Type C air leakage rate test of the containment isolation check valves.
| |
| (4) RHR Pump Supply, X-107 This line makes use of inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. This penetration satisfies ANSI-N271-1976. In addition, an ASME Section XI water leakage test is performed to verify system integrity. Thus, no Type C test is required for this line.
| |
| Test connections and pressurizing means are provided to test isolation valves or barriers for leaktightness. Either air, nitrogen or water is used as the pressurizing medium, depending on the physical location and service of each line. Leak testing of individual valves and penetrations is accomplished by one of the following methods:
| |
| (1) Method 1, Pressure Decay The test volume is established by closing the appropriate isolation valves.
| |
| The volume to be tested is established by either direct measurement of liquid drained from the system or by computation. The test volume is pressurized to 1 psig. With the test volume pressure recorded at intervals dependent on magnitude of test volume, the leakage rate is computed using the following equation:
| |
| TV P 1 P 2 T stp L i = -------- ------ - ------ -----------
| |
| t T 1 T 2 P stp Where:
| |
| Li = Local leak rate, cfm TV = Test volume, ft3 P1 = Initial pressure, psia P2 = Final pressure, psia T1 = Initial temperature, R T2 = Final temperature, R Tstp = 520R Pstp = 14.696 psia Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-5
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 t = Test duration, min.
| |
| (2) Method 2, Airflow (Mass Flowmeter)
| |
| The test volume is established by closing the appropriate isolation valves.
| |
| This method does not require the determination of the volume to be tested.
| |
| The test volume is pressurized and maintained at or slightly above 15 psig.
| |
| Pressure and airflow are recorded after stabilization of temperature, pressure and air flow.
| |
| (3) Method 3, Waterflow The test volume is established by closing the appropriate isolation valves.
| |
| The test volume is filled with water and vented by using the test vents and test connections provided on the containment penetrations. The test volume is pressurized and the leakage flow is measured from each valve.
| |
| The acceptance criteria for the Type C test are given in the Technical Specification which complies with Appendix J to 10 CFR 50.
| |
| 6.2.6.3 Scheduling and Reporting of Periodic Tests Type A integrated containment leakage tests are performed prior to operation of the plant and at three approximately equal intervals during each 10 years of operation with the last test occurring at the end of each 10-year period.
| |
| Type B and Type C leakage rate tests are performed at each refueling interval, not to exceed 24 months.
| |
| Test reports are made in accordance with Appendix J of 10 CFR 50 and as specified in the Technical Specifications.
| |
| 6.2.6.4 Special Testing Requirements Inleakage from the Shield Building to the Reactor Building annulus is checked preoperationally, and the exhaust flow rate to maintain the annulus at the specified negative pressure is continuously monitored when containment integrity is required except during abnormal or accident conditions. During accident conditions the Shield Building inleakage is not continuously monitored. Additional discussions on the engineered safety feature portion of the secondary containment air cleanup system are given in Section 6.2.3.
| |
| The effectiveness of fluid filled systems is verified by use of the systems during normal operation or periodic testing to show operability and the ability to develop required pressures.
| |
| 6.2.6-6 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-1 Penetrations Subjected To Type B Testing (Page 1 of 3)
| |
| Penetration Description X-121E RCP No. 1 - Non-Div.
| |
| X-122E RCP No. 2 - Non-Div.
| |
| X-123E RCP No. 3 - Non-Div.
| |
| X-124E RCP No. 4 - Non-Div.
| |
| X-125E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-126E 480V Power A X-127E 480V Power B X-128E 480V Power A X-129E 480V Power B X-130E Control - Non-Div.
| |
| X-131E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-132E Control Rod Drive Power X-133E Control Rod Drive Power X-134E 480V Power A X-135E 480V Power A X-136E 480V Power B X-137E 480V Power B X-138E Low Level - Non-Div.
| |
| X-139E Process Instr. Protection X-140E Incore Instrumentation X-141E 480V Power A X-142E Incore Instrumentation X-143E NIS Channel III X-144E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-145E Control Rod Pos. Detection X-146E Control Rod Drive Power X-147E Control A X-148E Process Inst. Control X-149E Low Level - Non-Div.
| |
| X-150E Annunciation and Communication X-151E NIS Channel IV X-152E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-153E Low Level - Non-Div.
| |
| X-154E Process Inst. Control X-155E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-156E Control B X-157E Annunciation X-158E Process Inst. Protection X-159E Process Inst. Control Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-7
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-1 Penetrations Subjected To Type B Testing (Page 2 of 3)
| |
| Penetration Description X-160E Annunciation and Communication X-161E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-163E NIS Channel I X-164E Control A X-165E Process Inst. Protection X-166E Control - Non-Div.
| |
| X-167E 480V Power - Non-Div.
| |
| X-168E Control - Non-Div.
| |
| X-169E Process Inst. Protection X-170E Process Inst. Control X-171E Control - Non-Div.
| |
| X-172E Control B X-173E Control - Non-Div.
| |
| X-174E NIS Channel II X-1 Equipment Hatch (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-2A Personnel Hatch (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-2B Personnel Hatch (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-3 Fuel Transfer Tube (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-54 Thimble Renewal (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-79A Ice Blowing (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-13A Main Steam Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-13B Main Steam Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-13C Main Steam Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-13D Main Steam Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-12A Main Feedwater Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-12B Main Feedwater Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-12C Main Feedwater Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-12D Main Feedwater Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-17 RHR Pump Return Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-107 RHR Pump Supply Line (Bellows)
| |
| X-14A Steam Generator Blowdown (Bellows)
| |
| X-14B Steam Generator Blowdown (Bellows)
| |
| X-14C Steam Generator Blowdown (Bellows)
| |
| X-14D Steam Generator Blowdown (Bellows)
| |
| X-15 Chemical and Volume Control System (Bellows)
| |
| X-20A Low Head Safety Injection System (Bellows)
| |
| X-20B Low Head Safety Injection System (Bellows)
| |
| X-21 Safety Injection Hot Legs (Bellows)
| |
| X-22 BIT Charging Pump Discharge (Bellows)
| |
| X-24 SIS Relief Valve Discharge (Bellows)
| |
| X-40D Hydrogen Purge (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-79B Ice Blowing (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-8A Feedwater Bypass (Bellows)
| |
| X-8B Feedwater Bypass (Bellows)
| |
| X-8C Feedwater Bypass (Bellows)
| |
| X-8D Feedwater Bypass (Bellows)
| |
| X-30 Accum. To Holdup Tank (Bellows)
| |
| X-32 High Head Safety Injection System (Bellows)
| |
| X-33 High Head Safety Injection System (Bellows) 6.2.6-8 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-1 Penetrations Subjected To Type B Testing (Page 3 of 3)
| |
| Penetration Description X-45 RC Drain Tank (Bellows)
| |
| X-46 RC Drain Tank (Bellows)
| |
| X-47A Glycol (Bellows)
| |
| X-47B Glycol (Bellows)
| |
| X-81 RC Drain Tank to Anal. (Bellows)
| |
| X-108 Testable Spare (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-108 Maintenance Port (Bellows)
| |
| X-109 Testable Spare (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-109 Maintenance Port (Bellows)
| |
| X-36 Steam Generator Cleanup (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-37 Maintenance Port (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-117 Maintenance Port (Resilient Seal)
| |
| X-118 Layup Water (Resilient Seal)
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-9
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 1 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-4 30-56(1) Lower Compt Purge Air Exhaust 30-57 X-5 30-58(1) Inst Room Purge Air Exhaust 30-59 X-6 30-50(1) Upper Compt Purge Air Exhaust 30-51 X-7 30-52(1) Upper Compt Purge Air Exhaust 30-53 X-9A 30-7 Upper Compt Purge Air Supply 30-8(1)
| |
| X-9B 30-9 Upper Compt Purge Air Supply 30-10(1)
| |
| X-10A 30-14 Lower Compt Purge Air Supply 30-15(1)
| |
| X-10B 30-16 Lower Compt Purge Air Supply 30-17(1)
| |
| X-11 30-19 Inst Room Purge Air Supply 30-20(1)
| |
| X-15 62-72 Chem and Vol System Letdown 62-73 62-74 62-76 62-77 62-662(1)
| |
| X-23 43-318 PAS Cont Air Intk TR-B 43-319 X-25A 43-11 Pressurizer Liquid Sample 43-12 X-25D 43-2 Pressurizer Steam Sample 43-3 X-26B 52-500 ILRT Sensor Line 52-504 X-26A 52-501 ILRT Sensor Line 52-505 X-28 43-341 PAS Cont Sump Rtrn TR-B 43-834 6.2.6-10 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-89 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 2 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-29 70-89 CCS from RC Pump Coolers 70-92 70-698 X-30 63-71 Accum to Holdup Tank 63-84 63-23 X-31 26-243 Fire Protection 26-1296 X-34 32-110 Control Air 32-288 32-293 X-35 70-85 CCS from Excess Letdn HX 70-703(1) CCS to Excess Letdn HX X-39A 63-64 N2 to Accumulators 77-868 X-39B 68-305 N2 to Press Relief Tank 77-849 X-41 77-127 Floor Sump Pump Disch 77-128 77-2875 X-42 81-12 Press Rel Tank Makeup 81-502 X-44 62-61 From RC Pump Seals 62-63 62-639 X-45 77-18 RC Drain Tank and Prt to VH 77-19 77-20 X-46 77-9 RC Drain Tank Pump Disch 77-10 84-530 X-47A 61-191 Glycol Supply 61-192 61-533 (Unit 1) 61-788 (Unit 2)
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-11
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 3 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-47B 61-193 Glycol Return 61-194 61-680 (Unit 1) 61-935 (Unit 2)
| |
| X-50A 70-87 RCP Therm Barrier Return 70-90 70-687 X-50B 70-679 RCP Therm Barrier Supply 70-134 X-52 70-140 CCS to RC Pump Coolers 1-70-100 1-70-790 X-53 70-143 CCS to Excess Letdown HX X-56A 67-107 Lower Cont ERCW Supply 1-67-113 1-67-1054D X-57A 67-111 Lower Cont ERCW Return 67-112 67-575D X-58A 67-83 Lower Cont ERCW Supply 67-89 67-1054A X-59A 67-87 Lower Cont ERCW Return 67-88 67-575A X-60A 67-99 Lower Cont ERCW Supply 67-105 67-1054B X-61A 67-103 Lower Cont ERCW Return 67-104 67-575B X-62A 67-91 Lower Cont ERCW Supply 67-97 67-1054C X-63A 67-95 Lower Cont ERCW Return 67-96 67-575C 6.2.6-12 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 4 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-64 31-305 Inst Room Chilled H2O Return 31-306 31-3421 X-65 31-309 Inst Room Chilled H2O Supply 31-308 31-3407 X-66 31-326 Inst Room Chilled H2O Return 31-327 31-3392 X-67 31-330 Inst Room Chilled H2O Supply 31-329 31-3378 X-68 67-141 Upper Cont ERCW Supply 67-580D X-69 67-130 Upper Cont ERCW Supply 67-580A X-70 67-139 Upper Cont ERCW Return 67-297 67-585B X-71 67-134 Upper Cont ERCW Return 67-296 67-585C X-72 67-142 Upper Cont ERCW Return 67-298 67-585D X-73 67-131 Upper Cont ERCW Return 67-295 67-585A X-74 67-138 Upper Cont ERCW Supply 67-580B X-75 67-133 Upper Cont ERCW Supply 67-580C X-76 33-713 (Unit 1) Service Air 33-714 (Unit 1) 33-732 (Unit 2) 33-733 (Unit 2)
| |
| X-77 59-522 Demineralized Water 59-698 Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-13
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 5 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-78 26-240 Fire Protection 26-1260 X-80 30-37 Lower Comp Press Relief 30-40 X-81 77-16 RC Drain Tk to Gas Analyzer 77-17 X-82 78-560 Refuel Cav Purification Pump Suction 78-561 X-83 78-557 Refuel Cav Purification Pump Discharge 78-558 X-84A 68-307 Prt to Gas Analyzer 68-308 X-85A 43-75 Ex Lt Dn Hx to Boron Anal 43-77 X-85B 43-22 Hot Leg Sample - Loops 1 & 3 43-23 X-86A 43-288 PAS Cont Air Intk TR-A 43-287 X-86B 43-883 PAS Cont Air Rtrn TR-A 43-307 X-86C 43-342 PAS Cont Sump Rtrn TR-A 43-841 X-90 32-102 Control Air TR-B 32-308 32-313 X-91 32-80 Control Air TR-A 32-298 32-303 X-92A 43-207 Hydrogen Analyzer TR-B 43-435 X-92B 43-208 Hydrogen Analyzer TR-B 43-436 X-92C 43-250 PAS Hot Leg 1 TR-A 43-251 X-93 43-34 Accum Sample 43-35 6.2.6-14 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-2 Containment Isolation Valves Subjected to Type C Testing (Page 6 of 6)
| |
| Isolation Penetration Valve No. No. Description X-94B 90-110 Upper Comp Air Mon Intake 90-111 X-94C 90-107 Upper Comp Air Mon Return 90-108 90-109 X-95B 90-116 Lower Comp Air Mon Intake 90-117 X-95C 90-113 Lower Comp Air Mon Return 90-114 90-115 X-96A 52-506 ILRT Sensor Line 52-502 X-96B 52-507 ILRT Sensor Line 52-503 X-97 30-134 Containment P Sensor 30-135 X-99 43-202 Hydrogen Analyzer TR-A 43-434 X-100 43-201 Hydrogen Analyzer TR-A 43-433 X-105 43-325 PAS Cont Air Rtrn TR-B 43-884 X-106 43-310 PAS Hot Leg 3 TR-B 43-309 X-114 61-110 Glycol Floor Cooling (From) 61-122 61-745 X-115 61-96 Glycol Floor Cooling (To) 61-97 61-692 Notes:
| |
| (1)These isolation valves are leakage rate tested in the reverse direction. This is acceptable since the results are equivalent or more conservative.
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-15
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-3 Valves Exempted From Type C Leak Testing (Page 1 of 4)
| |
| Penetration Valve No. No. System Justification X-8A FCV 3-236 Feedwater Bypass Note 1 LCV 3-164 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LCV 3-174 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 FCV 3-164A Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 X-8B FCV 3-239 Feedwater Bypass Note 1 X-8C FCV 3-242 Feedwater Bypass Note 1 X-8D FCV 3-245 Feedwater Bypass Note 1 LCV 3-171 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LCV 3-175 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 FCV 3-171A Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 X-12A FCV 3-33 Main Feedwater Note 1 ISV 41-586 S. G. Layup Note 1 X-12B FCV 3-47 Main Feedwater Note 1 ISV 41-589 S. G. Layup Note 1 X-12C FCV 3-87 Main Feedwater Note 1 ISV 41-592 S. G. Layup Note 1 X-12D FCV 3-100 Main Feedwater Note 1 ISV 41-595 S. G. Layup Note 1 X-13A FCV 1-4 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-147 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-15 Main Steam Note 1 DRV 1-536 Main Steam Note 1 PCV 1-5 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-522 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-523 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-524 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-525 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-526 Main Steam Note 1 X-13B FCV 1-11 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-148 Main Steam Note 1 PCV 1-12 Main Steam Note 1 DRV 1-534 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-517 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-518 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-519 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-520 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-521 Main Steam Note 1 6.2.6-16 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-85 Table 6.2.6-3 Valves Exempted From Type C Leak Testing (Page 2 of 4)
| |
| Penetration Valve No. No. System Justification X-13C FCV 1-22 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-23 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-149 Main Steam Note 1 DRV 1-532 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-512 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-513 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-514 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-515 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-516 Main Steam Note 1 X-13D FCV 1-29 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-150 Main Steam Note 1 PCV 1-30 Main Steam Note 1 DRV 1-538 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-16 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-527 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-528 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-529 Main Steam Note 1 FCV 1-530 Main Steam Note 1 SFV 1-531 Main Steam Note 1 X-14A FCV 1-14 Steam Generator Blowdown Note 1 X-14B FCV 1-32 Steam Generator Blowdown Note 1 X-14C FCV 1-25 Steam Generator Blowdown Note 1 X-14D FCV 1-7 Steam Generator Blowdown Note 1 X-16 62-543* Normal Charging Note 3 X-17 63-640* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 63-643* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 FCV 63-158 RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 X-19A FCV 63-072 SIS (Sump Suction) Note 5 FCV 72-044 CS (Sump Suction) Note 5 X-19B FCV 63-073 SIS (Sump Suction) Note 5 FCV 72-045 CS (Sump Suction) Note 5 X-20A FCV 63-112 RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 63-633* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 63-635* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 X-20B FCV 63-111 RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 63-632* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 63-634* RHR (Low HD SIS) Note 2 X-21 FCV 63-167 SIS (Safety Injection) Note 6 63-547* Note 6 63-549* Note 6 Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-17
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Table 6.2.6-3 Valves Exempted From Type C Leak Testing (Page 3 of 4)
| |
| Penetration Valve No. No. System Justification X-22 FCV 63-174 SIS (Charging) Note 7 63-581* SIS (Charging) Note 7 X-24 68-559* Reactor Coolant Note 8 X-25B 30-42C1 Containment P Sensor Note 11 30-42C2 X-25C 30-30CC1 Containment P Sensor Note 11 30-30CC2 X-26C 30-43C1 Containment P Sensor Note 11 30-43C2 30-310C1 30-310C2 X-27A FCV 43-55 SG Blowdown Sample Line Note 1 X-27B FCV 43-58 SG Blowdown Sample Line Note 1 X-27C FCV 43-61 SG Blowdown Sample Line Note 1 X-27D FCV 43-64 SG Blowdown Sample Line Note 1 X-32 FCV 63-21 SIS (Safety Injection) Note 6 63-543* SIS (Safety Injection) Note 6 63-545* SIS (Safety Injection) Note 6 6.2.6-18 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Table 6.2.6-3 Valves Exempted From Type C Leak Testing (Page 4 of 4)
| |
| Penetration Valve No. No. System Justification X-33 FCV 63-121 SIS (Safety Injection) Note 6 63-551 Note 6 63-553 Note 6 63-555 Note 6 63-557 Note 6 X-40A LCV 3-156 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LCV 3-173 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LCV 3-156A Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 X-40B LCV 3-148 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LCV 3-172 Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 LXC 3-148A Auxiliary Feedwater Note 1 X-43A 62-562* CVCS (Pump Seal Injection) Note 9 X-43B 62-561* CVCS (Pump Seal Injection) Note 9 X-43C 62-563* CVCS (Pump Seal Injection) Note 9 X-43D 62-560* CVCS (Pump Seal Injection) Note 9 X-48A 72-548* Containment Spray Note 10 X-48B 72-549* Containment Spray Note 10 X-49A 72-562* RHR (RHR Spray) Note 10 X-49B 72-563* RHR (RHR Spray) Note 10 X-85C 30-45C1 Containment P Sensor Note 11 30-45C2 X-96C 30-44C1 Containment P Sensor Note 11 30-44C2 30-311C1 30-311C2 X-107 FCV 74-2 RHR Note 4 FCV 74-8 RHR Note 4 RFV 74-505 RHR Note 4 FCV 63-185 SIS Note 4
| |
| *Check Valve Note 1.This penetration is directly connected to the secondary side of the steam generator. The main steam, feedwater, and steam generator blowdown lines of PWR containments are not required to be tested (see definition of Type C test in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J). These lines are assumed not to rupture as a result of an accident (missile Protected). Any leakage through these lines would be identified during operation by the leakage detection program. In addition, during a design basis accident, the secondary side would be at a higher pressure than the Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-19
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 containment atmosphere, thus preventing outleakage from containment. The integrity of the inside piping is also verified during the Type A test.
| |
| Note 2.This penetration uses inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C testing for this penetration is not required since a continuous water seal will be provided at a pressure greater than 1.1 Pa and a guaranteed 30-day water inventory.
| |
| Testing will be performed in accordance with ASME XI, IWV.
| |
| Note 3.This penetration uses an inboard check valve and a closed loop outside containment (CLOC) as the means of containment isolation. Type C testing for this path is not required due to the presence of a 1.1 Pa pressure and a 30-day inventory criteria as specified in 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. A positive pressure preventing air outleakage is assured by the pressure applied against FCV-62-90 and FCV-62-91 (both of which receive a phase A signal) by the high-head SI pumps. Water testing for piping integrity is performed in accordance with ASME XI, IWV.
| |
| Note 4.This line makes use of inboard containment isolation valves an a CLOC for containment boundaries. This penetration satisfies ANSI-N271-1976. In addition, an ASME Section XI water leakage test will be performed to verify system integrity.
| |
| Note 5.This line makes use of a containment isolation valve located outside of containment and a CLOC for containment isolation boundaries. During a design basis accident, this line would be submerged under water which would preclude air outleakage. In addition, these valves are exposed to Pa during each Type A test.
| |
| Note 6.This line makes use of inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. These lines are postulated to be inservice post-accident and when not in use, the pumps maintain a pressure seal greater than 1.1 Pa.
| |
| Note 7.This line makes use of inboard containment isolation valves and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C testing is not required for the same reasons as X-21 and X-32 as stated in Note 6. Water seal is provided by the high-head pumps.
| |
| Note 8.This line uses an inboard containment isolation valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Pa during the design basis accident would not create a substantial outleakage driving force and, in any case, tend to cause the relief valves in the CLOC to seat rather than lift. The systems feeding this line are ECCS and, due either to operating pressure or static head outleakage would be prevented. This line is exposed to the Pa test pressure during the Type A test.
| |
| 6.2.6-20 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-91 Note 9.This line makes use of an inboard containment isolation valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries. Type C testing is not required for the same reason as given for X-16 in Note 3.
| |
| Note 10.This line makes use of an inboard containment isolation valve and a CLOC for containment boundaries. An inventory test is performed to ensure a 30-day inventory at a pressure greater than 1.1 Pa exists, should one spray system shut down. This will prevent outleakage of containment atmosphere.
| |
| Note 11.This instrument line has a CLOC for containment boundary. This design is required as discussed in Section 6.2.4. This instrument is tested at Pa during the Type A test.
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-21
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 1 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status A. PENETRATION STATUS DURING TEST PERFORMANCE X-1 Equipment Hatch Closed X-2A Elevation 719'- 4" Air Lock Closed X-2B Elevation 760'- 4" Air Lock Closed X-3 Fuel Transfer Tube Closed X-4 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-5 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-6 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-7 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-8 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-8A Feedwater Bypass Normal Lineup X-8B Feedwater Bypass Normal Lineup X-8C Feedwater Bypass Normal Lineup X-8D Feedwater Bypass Normal Lineup X-9A Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-9B Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-10A Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-10B Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-11 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-12A Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-12B Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-12C Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-12D Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-13A Main and Reheat Steam System Normal Lineup X-13B Main and Reheat Steam System Normal Lineup X-13C Main and Reheat Steam System Normal Lineup X-13D Main and Reheat Steam System Normal Lineup X-14A Steam Generator Blowdown System Normal Lineup X-14B Steam Generator Blowdown System Normal Lineup X-14C Steam Generator Blowdown System Normal Lineup X-14D Steam Generator Blowdown System Normal Lineup X-15 Chemical and Volume Control System Drained & Vented X-16 Chemical and Volume Control System Normal Lineup X-17 Residual Heat Removal System Normal Lineup X-18 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-19A Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-19B Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-20A Safety Injection System Normal Lineup 6.2.6-22 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 2 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status X-20B Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-21 Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-22 Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-23 PAS Cont. Air Intk LC Tr-B Vented X-24 Reactor Coolant System Normal Lineup X-25A Radiation System Drained & Vented X-25B Containment P Sensor (PdT30-42) Vented X-25C Containment P Sensor (PdT30-30c) Vented X-25D Radiation Sampling System Drained & Vented X-26A ILRT Sensor Line In Use (see Note 2)
| |
| X-26B ILRT Sensor Line In Use (see Note 2)
| |
| X-26C Containment P Sensor (PdT30-43) Vented X-27A Radiation Sampling System Normal Lineup X-27B Radiation Sampling System Normal Lineup X-27C Radiation Sampling System Normal Lineup X-27D Radiation Sampling System Normal Lineup X-28 PAS Cont. Sump Return Tr-B Drained & Vented X-29 Component Cooling System Drained & Vented X-30 Safety Injection System Drained & Vented X-31 Fire Protection Drained & Vented X-32 Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-33 Safety Injection System Normal Lineup X-34 Control Air System Vented X-35 Component Cooling Water System Drained & Vented X-36 SG Chem. Cleaning Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-37 Maintenance Port Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-38 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-39A Waste Disposal System Vented X-39B Waste Disposal System Vented X-39C Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-39D Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-40A Auxiliary Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-40B Auxiliary Feedwater System Normal Lineup X-40C Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-40D Hydrogen Purge Vented X-41 Waste Disposal System Drained & Vented X-42 Primary Water System Drained & Vented X-43A Chemical and Volume Control System Normal Lineup X-43B Chemical and Volume Control System Normal Lineup X-43C Chemical and Volume Control System Normal Lineup X-43D Chemical and Volume Control System Normal Lineup X-44 Chemical and Volume Control System Drained & Vented X-45 Waste Disposal System Vented X-46 Waste Disposal System Drained and Vented Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-23
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 3 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status X-47A Ice Condenser System In Use X-47B Ice Condenser System In Use X-48A Containment Spray System Normal Lineup X-48B Containment Spray System Normal Lineup X-49A Containment Spray System Normal Lineup X-49B Containment Spray System Normal Lineup X-50A Component Cooling System Drained & Vented X-50B Component Cooling System Drained & Vented X-51 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-52 Component Cooling System Drained & Vented X-53 Component Cooling System Drained & Vented X-54 Thimble Renewal In Use X-55 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-56A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-56B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-57A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-57B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-58A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-58B RCS Pressure Sensor Normal Lineup X-59A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-59B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-60A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-60B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-61A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-61B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-62A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-62B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-63A Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-63B Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-64 Air Conditioning System Drained & Vented X-65 Air Conditioning System Drained & Vented X-66 Air Conditioning System Drained & Vented X-67 Air Conditioning System Drained & Vented X-68 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-69 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-70 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-71 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-72 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-73 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-74 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-75 Essential Raw Cooling Water Drained & Vented X-76 Control and Service Air System Vented X-77 Demineralized Water and Cask Decon Drained & Vented 6.2.6-24 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 4 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status X-78 Fire Protection Drained & Vented X-79A Ice Blowing Vented X-79B Negative Return Vented X-80 Heating and Ventilating Air Flow Vented X-81 Waste Disposal System Drained & Vented X-82 Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleaning System Drained & Vented X-83 Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleaning System Drained & Vented X-84A Radiation Sampling System Drained & Vented X-84B RVLIS Normal Lineup X-84C RVLIS Normal Lineup X-84D RVLIS Normal Lineup X-85A Radiation Sampling System Drained & Vented X-85B Radiation Sampling System Drained & Vented X-85C Containment P Sensor (PdT30-45) Vented X-85D Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-86A PAS Cont. Air Intk UC Tr-A Vented X-86B PAS Cont. Air Rtrn Tr-A Vented X-86C PAS Cont. Sump Rtrn Tr-A Drained & Vented X-86D Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-87A Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-87B RVLIS Normal Lineup X-87C RVLIS Normal Lineup X-87D RVLIS Normal Lineup X-88 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-89 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-90 Control Air System Tr-B Vented X-91 Control Air System Tr-A Vented X-92A Hydrogen Analyzer Tr-B Vented X-92B Hydrogen Analyzer Tr-B Vented X-92C PAS Hot Leg 1 Tr-A Drained & Vented X-92D Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-93 Radiation Sampling System Drained & Vented X-94A Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-94B Radiation Monitoring System Vented X-94C Radiation Monitoring System Vented X-95A Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-95B Radiation Monitoring System Vented X-95C Radiation Monitoring System Vented X-96A ILRT Sensor Line In Use (see Note 2)
| |
| X-96B ILRT Sensor Line In Use (see Note 2)
| |
| X-96C Containment P Sensor (Pdt 30-44) Vented X-97 Containment P Sensor (PdT30-133) Vented X-98 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-25
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 5 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status X-99 Hydrogen Analyzer Tr-A Vented X-100 Hydrogen Analyzer Tr-A Vented X-101 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-102 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-103 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-104 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-105 PAS Cont. Air Rtrn Tr-B Vented X-106 PAS Hot Leg 3 Tr-B Drained & Vented X-107 Residual Heat Removal System Normal Lineup X-108 Maintenance Port Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-109 Maintenance Port Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-110 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-111 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-112 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-113 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-114 Ice Condenser System In Use X-115 Ice Condenser System In Use X-116 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-117 Maintenance Port Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-118 Layup Water Treatment In Use X-119 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-120 Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-121E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-122E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-123E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-124E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-125E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-126E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-127E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-128E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-129E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-130E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-131E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-132E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-133E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-134E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-135E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-136E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-137E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-138E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-139E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-140E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-141E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-142E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1) 6.2.6-26 Containment Leakage Testing
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 6 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status X-143E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-144E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-145E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-146E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-147E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-148E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-149E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-150E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-151E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-152E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-153E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-154E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-155E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-156E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-157E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-158E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-159E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-160E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-161E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-162E Seal Welded Spare Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-163E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-164E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-165E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-166E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-167E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-168E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-169E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-170E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-171F Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-172E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-173E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| X-174E Electrical Penetration Vented (see Note 1)
| |
| Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-27
| |
| | |
| WATTS BAR WBNP-88 Table 6.2.6-4 Containment Vessel Pressure And Leak Test Reactor Building Containment Penetration Status (Page 7 of 7)
| |
| Penetration Description Status B.TESTABLE PENETRATIONS REQUIRED TO BE INSERVICE DURING TEST PERFORMANCE X-26A Integrated Leak Rate Test Isolation valves required to be open X-26B to monitor containment pressure (see Note 2)
| |
| Glycol cooling supply to air handling units in ice condenser required to X-47A Ice Condenser System ensure ice condition is maintained Same as X-47A Used as pressuriza-tion point for air compressors Isolation valves required to be open X-47B Ice Condenser System to monitor containment pressure (see Note 2)
| |
| X-54 Thimble Renewal X-96A Integrated Leak Rate Test X-96B X-107 Residual Heat Removal System Residual heat removal system required inservice to remove decay heat from fuel Glycol return from air handling units required to ensure ice condition is X-114 Ice Condenser System maintained Same as X-114 Used as source for verification flow and post-test depressurization; X-115 Ice Condenser System opened during DBF event to drain water from annulus to Reactor X-118 Hatch Building floor and equipment drain sump Notes:
| |
| : 1. These penetrations are closed. Venting is provided by the design of the penetration such that any leakage is detectable by the integrated leak rate test.
| |
| : 2. These penetrations are designed to facilitate ILRT performance. It may not be necessary to utilize all of the penetrations. If not in use, the penetration is vented.
| |
| Watts Bar FSAR Section 6.0 Containment Leakage Testing 6.2.6-28 Containment Leakage Testing}}
| |
