ML20052C543: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:"
{{#Wiki_filter:"
1 Wisconsin Electnc m ca.ma 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUMEE. WI 53201 April 27, 16 Milf , ,
1 Wisconsin Electnc m ca.ma 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUMEE. WI 53201 April 27, 16 Milf,,
qf         y , _,.
qf y, _,.
CERTIFIED MAIL                                                                 i JU ft           g 9
JU CERTIFIED MAIL i
6,,,   '
ft g 6,,,
Mr. H. R. Den tion , Director                                         Q             '_.3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation                                 j     ,    ,7         ~
Mr. H.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                           f c\
R. Den tion, Director Q
                                                                                    'g' . f [
9
Washington, D. C.                 20555
'_.3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j
,7
~
U.
S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c\\
'g'. f [
f Washington, D. C.
20555 Q
'O


==Dear Mr. Denton:==
==Dear Mr. Denton:==
Qg  gg
g gg DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 77 LOSS OF VOLTAGE PROTECTIVE RELAY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Licensee) hereby applies for amendments to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-24 and DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
                                                                                                  'O DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 77 LOSS OF VOLTAGE PROTECTIVE RELAY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Licensee) hereby applies for amendments to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-24 and DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.
The purpose of these amendments is to incorporate changes into the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.
The purpose of these amendments is to incorporate changes into the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications. These changes, which are discussed further below, revise the time delay settings on the loss of voltage protective relays as specified in Item 10 of Table 15.3.5-1 of the specifications.
These changes, which are discussed further below, revise the time delay settings on the loss of voltage protective relays as specified in Item 10 of Table 15.3.5-1 of the specifications.
4 On March 31, 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued License Amendment Nos. 47 and 52 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. These amendments included new specifications on the voltage settings and time delay settings for the 4.16 KV and 480 V loss of voltage protective relays.         On April 9, 1982, Licensee discovered during the calibra-tion check of these relays under this specification that the time-delay setting of zero volts for the 4.16 KV loss of voltage relays could not be set within the 15% of 0.3 second delay specified in Item 10.a of Table 15.3.5-1. The apparent cause of this was a misinterpretation of the characteristic curves during Technical Specification drafting. Accordingly, Licensee is requesting these license amendments to revise specifications in Table 15.3.5-1, Items 10.a and 10.b, under setting limits as follows:
4 On March 31, 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued License Amendment Nos. 47 and 52 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.
: a. 2450 V 13%
These amendments included new specifications on the voltage settings and time delay settings for the 4.16 KV and 480 V loss of voltage protective relays.
Time delay:           <0.4 seconds +10% at 0 volts 11 2 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting Ol S
On April 9, 1982, Licensee discovered during the calibra-tion check of these relays under this specification that the time-delay setting of zero volts for the 4.16 KV loss of voltage relays could not be set within the 15% of 0.3 second delay specified in Item 10.a of Table 15.3.5-1.
8205050126 820427 Ii PDR ADOCK 05000266     PDR p
The apparent cause of this was a misinterpretation of the characteristic curves during Technical Specification drafting.
Accordingly, Licensee is requesting these license amendments to revise specifications in Table 15.3.5-1, Items 10.a and 10.b, under setting limits as follows:
a.
2450 V 13%
Time delay:
<0.4 seconds +10% at 0 volts 1
2 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting 1
Ol S Ii 8205050126 820427 PDR ADOCK 05000266 PDR p


Mr. II . R. Denton                             April 27, 1982
Mr. II. R. Denton April 27, 1982 b.
: b. 256 V +3%
256 V +3%
Time delay:   10.75 seconds +10% at 0 volts
Time delay:
,                            13.5 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting The above changes include an increase from 0.3 to 0.4 on the 4160 relays. This change represents the actual limit in accordance with the original design as described by the.
10.75 seconds +10% at 0 volts 13.5 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting The above changes include an increase from 0.3 to 0.4 on the 4160 relays.
characteristic curve specification. The less than or equal to signs are added for clarification and do not change the intent of the specification. The tolerance changes from +5% to +10% and
This change represents the actual limit in accordance with the original design as described by the.
    +10% to +20% on the time delay settings were made to more accurately reflect the setpoint variation of the relays in relation to the time characteristic of the device. This will not change the intent of the specification nor affect the ability for the system to respond to the required parameters of the safety analysis. All other specifications have been verified as correct and have not been changed.
characteristic curve specification.
In accordance with the requirement of 10 CFR Part 170.22, Licensee has determined that this amendment application for Unit 1 requires a Class III amendment approval fee. A duplicate amendment approval for Point Beach Unit 2 requires a Class I approval fee.
The less than or equal to signs are added for clarification and do not change the intent of the specification.
Accordingly, we have enclosed herewith a check payable to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the amount of $4,400 for these approval fees.
The tolerance changes from +5% to +10% and
As specified in the Commission's regulations, enclosed herewith are three signed originals and, under separate cover, 40 copies of this change request. Your prompt action of this request will be appreciated. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this application.
+10% to +20% on the time delay settings were made to more accurately reflect the setpoint variation of the relays in relation to the time characteristic of the device.
This will not change the intent of the specification nor affect the ability for the system to respond to the required parameters of the safety analysis.
All other specifications have been verified as correct and have not been changed.
In accordance with the requirement of 10 CFR Part 170.22, Licensee has determined that this amendment application for Unit 1 requires a Class III amendment approval fee.
A duplicate amendment approval for Point Beach Unit 2 requires a Class I approval fee.
Accordingly, we have enclosed herewith a check payable to the U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the amount of $4,400 for these approval fees.
As specified in the Commission's regulations, enclosed herewith are three signed originals and, under separate cover, 40 copies of this change request.
Your prompt action of this request will be appreciated.
Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this application.
Very truly yours,
Very truly yours,
                                                      ./
./
[t G!   $
[t G!
Assistant Vice President C. W. Fay Enclosures (Check No. 670542)
Assistant Vice President C. W.
Copy to NRC Resident Inspector         .
Fay Enclosures (Check No. 670542)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27M6: day of April 1982.
Copy to NRC Resident Inspector Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27M6: day of April 1982.
MY Notary B2blic, State of Wisconsin My Commission expires     Od /14 T'/.
MY Notary B2blic, State of Wisconsin My Commission expires Od /14 T'/.
q-   -}}
q-v}}

Latest revision as of 07:42, 18 December 2024

Forwards Tech Spec Change Request 77 to Revise Time Delay Settings on Loss of Voltage Protective Relays
ML20052C543
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/27/1982
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20052C544 List:
References
NUDOCS 8205050126
Download: ML20052C543 (2)


Text

"

1 Wisconsin Electnc m ca.ma 231 W. MICHIGAN. P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUMEE. WI 53201 April 27, 16 Milf,,

qf y, _,.

JU CERTIFIED MAIL i

ft g 6,,,

Mr. H.

R. Den tion, Director Q

9

'_.3 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j

,7

~

U.

S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c\\

'g'. f [

f Washington, D. C.

20555 Q

'O

Dear Mr. Denton:

g gg DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST NO. 77 LOSS OF VOLTAGE PROTECTIVE RELAY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Wisconsin Electric Power Company (Licensee) hereby applies for amendments to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-24 and DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2.

The purpose of these amendments is to incorporate changes into the Point Beach Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

These changes, which are discussed further below, revise the time delay settings on the loss of voltage protective relays as specified in Item 10 of Table 15.3.5-1 of the specifications.

4 On March 31, 1981, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission issued License Amendment Nos. 47 and 52 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively.

These amendments included new specifications on the voltage settings and time delay settings for the 4.16 KV and 480 V loss of voltage protective relays.

On April 9, 1982, Licensee discovered during the calibra-tion check of these relays under this specification that the time-delay setting of zero volts for the 4.16 KV loss of voltage relays could not be set within the 15% of 0.3 second delay specified in Item 10.a of Table 15.3.5-1.

The apparent cause of this was a misinterpretation of the characteristic curves during Technical Specification drafting.

Accordingly, Licensee is requesting these license amendments to revise specifications in Table 15.3.5-1, Items 10.a and 10.b, under setting limits as follows:

a.

2450 V 13%

Time delay:

<0.4 seconds +10% at 0 volts 1

2 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting 1

Ol S Ii 8205050126 820427 PDR ADOCK 05000266 PDR p

Mr. II. R. Denton April 27, 1982 b.

256 V +3%

Time delay:

10.75 seconds +10% at 0 volts 13.5 seconds +20% at 90% of voltage setting The above changes include an increase from 0.3 to 0.4 on the 4160 relays.

This change represents the actual limit in accordance with the original design as described by the.

characteristic curve specification.

The less than or equal to signs are added for clarification and do not change the intent of the specification.

The tolerance changes from +5% to +10% and

+10% to +20% on the time delay settings were made to more accurately reflect the setpoint variation of the relays in relation to the time characteristic of the device.

This will not change the intent of the specification nor affect the ability for the system to respond to the required parameters of the safety analysis.

All other specifications have been verified as correct and have not been changed.

In accordance with the requirement of 10 CFR Part 170.22, Licensee has determined that this amendment application for Unit 1 requires a Class III amendment approval fee.

A duplicate amendment approval for Point Beach Unit 2 requires a Class I approval fee.

Accordingly, we have enclosed herewith a check payable to the U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the amount of $4,400 for these approval fees.

As specified in the Commission's regulations, enclosed herewith are three signed originals and, under separate cover, 40 copies of this change request.

Your prompt action of this request will be appreciated.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this application.

Very truly yours,

./

[t G!

Assistant Vice President C. W.

Fay Enclosures (Check No. 670542)

Copy to NRC Resident Inspector Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27M6: day of April 1982.

MY Notary B2blic, State of Wisconsin My Commission expires Od /14 T'/.

q-v