ML20005A951: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:,     ~ ..          ._.                                            .                                                          .          _ _ . - .  .    .
{{#Wiki_filter:,
1 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                                                       !
~..
'                                                                        WASHINGTON 20426
1 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 20426
                  ~
~
'IN REPLY REFER TO:
4
4
                                                                                                                                      'IN REPLY REFER TO:
+
+
s
s June 23, 1981.
,                                                                                                      June 23, 1981.
j -
j-4 i
4 i
i                   B. J. Youngblood Chief, Licesning Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U. S.-Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
i B. J. Youngblood Chief, Licesning Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U. S.-Nuclear Regulatory Comm.
,                    Washington, D'. C.. 20555
Washington, D'. C..
 
20555
==Dear Mr. .-Youngblood:==


==Dear Mr..-Youngblood:==
I am replying to your request of-May 26, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Comanche Peak Steam i
I am replying to your request of-May 26, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Comanche Peak Steam i
~
Electric' Station, Units 1 &'2.
Electric' Station, Units 1 &'2. This Draft EIS has been reviewed-by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
This Draft EIS has been reviewed-
This staff. concentrates its review of other' agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically.on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and = oil pipeline industries for which the comission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff t                   has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-I voled with the proposed' action.                                   It does not. appear that there                                                         '
~
would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.
i                            Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
This staff. concentrates its review of other' agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically.on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and = oil pipeline industries for which the comission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff t
Sincerely,
has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-I voled with the proposed' action.
                                                                                / ack M. Heiremann dvisor on F"vironmental Quality 4
It does not. appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.
i                                                                                                                                                             **
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
            - 8107060098 810 G*Ss !
i Sincerely,
,            PDR ADOCK 0500                         5 O                             L.. R 4
/ ack M. Heiremann dvisor on F"vironmental Quality 4
    ., ,U.,.-n.,6-, ..    -....w -,,,_.-m ,_,..,,me,_..,v.,,,y,.seg,
i G*Ss !
                                                                            ,,.,-M-&,..., , w y, %m..m p,,,,ume-w.,,   y,..c,-,,y,%,.,..,y--           ,m.     -w,,,-e,,p,,}}
- 8107060098 810 PDR ADOCK 0500 5
O L.. R 4
,U.,.-n.,6-,
-....w
-,,,_.-m
,_,..,,me,_..,v.,,,y,.seg,
,,.,-M-&,...,
, w y, %m..m p,,,,ume-w.,,
y,..c,-,,y,%,.,..,y--
,m.
-w,,,-e,,p,,
-}}

Latest revision as of 09:30, 23 December 2024

Comments on Des for Facilities.No Significant Impacts Re FERC Areas of Concern Were Found
ML20005A951
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/1981
From: Heinemann J
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
To: Youngblood B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8107060098
Download: ML20005A951 (1)


Text

,

~..

1 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 20426

~

'IN REPLY REFER TO:

4

+

s June 23, 1981.

j -

4 i

i B. J. Youngblood Chief, Licesning Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing U. S.-Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D'. C..

20555

Dear Mr..-Youngblood:

I am replying to your request of-May 26, 1981 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Comanche Peak Steam i

Electric' Station, Units 1 &'2.

This Draft EIS has been reviewed-

~

by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.

This staff. concentrates its review of other' agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically.on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and = oil pipeline industries for which the comission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff t

has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-I voled with the proposed' action.

It does not. appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.

i Sincerely,

/ ack M. Heiremann dvisor on F"vironmental Quality 4

i G*Ss !

- 8107060098 810 PDR ADOCK 0500 5

O L.. R 4

,U.,.-n.,6-,

-....w

-,,,_.-m

,_,..,,me,_..,v.,,,y,.seg,

,,.,-M-&,...,

, w y, %m..m p,,,,ume-w.,,

y,..c,-,,y,%,.,..,y--

,m.

-w,,,-e,,p,,

-