ML18022A260: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[A11010, 30441R00030, Revision a, Mo-99 Target Cooling System Eismic Analysis Design Calculation Report]]
| number = ML18022A260
| issue date = 01/11/2017
| title = 30441R00030, Revision a, Mo-99 Target Cooling System Eismic Analysis Design Calculation Report.
| author name = Mar A
| author affiliation = General Atomics, Univ of Missouri - Columbia
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR, Nordion (Canada), Inc, US Dept of Energy, National Nuclear Security Admin
| docket = 05000186
| license number = R-103
| contact person =
| case reference number = CAC A11010/05000186/L-2017-LLA-0227, DE-NA0002773
| document report number = 30441R00030, Rev A
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 50
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:RELEASED    30441R00030 CDMA vd 2017/01/11    Revision A REACTOR-BASED MOLYBDENUM-99 SUPPLY SYSTEM PROJECT M0-99 TARGET COOLING SYSTEM SEISMIC ANALYSIS DESIGN CALCULATION REPORT Prepared by General Atomics for the U.S. Department of Energy/National Nuclear Security Administration and Nordion Canada Inc.
Cooperative Agreement DE-NA0002773 GA Project 30441 WBS 1110 M ~
        ;/-- ;...                ~ nordion
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report  30441 R00030/A REVISION HISTORY Revision       Date                            Description of Changes A        11JAN17    Initial Release POINT OF CONTACT INFORMATION PREPARED BY:
Name                  Position                Email                      Phone Alvin Mar            Engineer                Alvin .Mar@ga.com          858-676-7602
            ,                          APPROVED BY:
Name                  Position                Email                      Phone B. Schleicher        Chief Engineer          Bob.Schleicher@ga.com      858-455-4 733 K. Murray            Project Manager        Katherine .Murray@ga.com  858-455-3272 K. Partain            Quality Engineer        Katherine .Partain@ga.com  858-455-3225 DESIGN CONTROL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION D    R&D                      DISC                  QA LEVEL                SYS
[g'.J DV&S D    DESIGN D    T&E N                          II                NIA D    NA ii
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                                  30441 R00030/A TABLE OF CONTENTS REVISION HISTORY .................................................................................................................... ii POINT OF CONTACT INFORMATION ........................................................................................ ii DESIGN CONTROL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ............................................................................ ii ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................vi 1      OBJECTIVE ....................................... ............................................................................... 1 2      APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS .................................................................... ....................... 2 3      IN PUTS ................................................................ ............................................................. 2 3.1      General. .... ... .... ..... .. ....... ...... ........ ... ..... ... .. .. ............ ....... ... ..... .... ... .. ..... ......... ... ... ....... 2 3.2      Loads ... ..... .. .... ... .. ...... .... ... .. .. .. ......... .... .. .. ....... ... .............. .. ...... .... .. ..... ..... ...... ............ 3 4      ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................................................ 3 5      METHOD ..................................................... ...................................................................... 3 6      AUTOPIPE MODEL .......................................................................................................... 4 6.1      Support Details .. ... .. .. .. ........ ..... ... ... .... .. .. ... .. .... ...... ........ .... .. .. ....... ..... .. ..... .. .. ... ........ . 10 6.2      Valves and Flanges ..... ... ... .. ................ ..... .. ..... .............. .... ....... ..... ...... ...... .. ... ... .. ... . 11 6.3      Piping ... .. .......... .. .. .... .. ..... .. .. .. ...... ... .... ...... ...... ..... .... ..... .... ........ ........... ... ... ...... ........ 12 6.4      Flexible Joints .. .. .. ... ..... .... .... ......... ..................... ... ....... ..... ... .............. ..... .. .... ..... ..... . 13 7      CALC UATION BODY ..................................................................................................... 14 7.1      Operational Loading ... .. ..... .... ... .... ..... ... ..... ... .. ........ ... .. ......... .... ...... ... ..... .. .. ... .......... 14 7 .2      Seismic Loads ....... ... .... .. .... .... .... ......... ...... .. ..... ......... .. .. .. ..... .. .. ....... .. .... .. .. ... ......... .. 14 7 .2.1  Site Specific Criteria ......... ........ ...... ..... ..... ... .... .. .... ... ... ...... .... .. .... ........ ... .. ....... 14 7.2.2    Seismic Forces .. ..... ............ .. ... ..... .. .. .... ... .... ..... ... .... .... .... ................. ........ ....... 15 8        RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 16 8.1      ASME B31.3 Code Stress Results .... .... ............ .. .. ...... .. ...... .... ... ...... .. .. ... ........ .. ...... 16 8.1.1    ASME B31 .3 Sustain Stress Ratio Plots .. ... .. .......... .... ... ... .... .... ..... ... .. ... ... .... .. 18 8.1.2    ASME B31 .3 Expansion Stress Ratio Plots ......... ....... .... ................... .... .... ...... 21 8.1.3    ASME B31 .3 Hoop Stress Ratio Plots .... ... ...... ... ..... .... ..... .. ...... ... .... ..... ...... ... .. 24 8.1.4    ASME B31.3 Occasional Stress Ratio Plots ..... ........ .. ..... .... ..... ... .................... 27 8.2        Seismic Displacement ...... ....... ........ .. .... ... ... .... ... ... .. ....... .. .. .. ... ..... ...... .. ......... .. .. ..... . 30 9        SUPPORT AND ANCHOR LOADS ................................................................................ 31 10      CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................................................. 36 11      REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 36 APPENDIX A        USGS DESIGN MAPS DETAIL REPORT .................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B        USGS MAPS
 
==SUMMARY==
REPORT ............................................................. B-1 APPENDIX C        FEMA MAPS ................................................................................................. C-1 iii
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                              30441 R00030/A LIST OF FIGURES Figure  1. Moly 99 Solidworks model ..... .. ...................... ... .... ................. ... .... ......... ... .. .. ................ 2 Figure  2. Solidworks Assembly (Red Box is the piping of interest) ..... .... .................. ..... .. ............ 5 Figure  3. AutoPIPE's model of the piping of interest .......... .. ............ ........ ...... .. ..... .. ...... .............. 6 Figure  4. Solidworks Level 3-4 up-close view ........ ........ ..... .. .. .... .. .......... .. ... ....................... .... .. .. . 7 Figure  5. AutoPIPE Level 3-4 up-close view ........................ ............ .... ... .... .. .... .. ....... .. .......... ...... 8 Figure  6. Solidworks model with pool hidden ............... .. .... ....... ...... ................... ......... .... ... ... .. ..... 9 Figure  7. AutoPIPE model with pool hidden ..................................... ...... ................................... 10 Figure  8. AutoPIPE Model Guide Support Value ..... ...... .... ....... ........ ... .. .. ........ .. ........ ..... ...... ..... 11 Figure  9. AutoPIPE Model Line Stop Value ....................... .. .. ... ........ ...................... .. .. ... .. .......... 11 Figure  10. Pipe sizes ....... .... ............... .. ...... .. ....... .......... .. ..... ... ......... ...... .. ....... .. ...... ...... ......... ... 13 Figure 11 . Flexible joint input values .... .. .................................................. ............................. .. .. . 14 Figure 12. AutoPIPE Seismic Inputs and corresponding G levels .... .. .... ................................... 16 Figure 13. GR + MaxP{1 } Stress Ratio Plot.. ........................................... .... .. ... .. .. .. .. ...... ........... 18 Figure 14. GR+ MaxP{1 } Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes .. .. ....................... 19 Figure 15. GR+ MaxP{1 } Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes .. ................................. 20 Figure 16. Amb to T1 {1} Stress Ratio Plot.. ............... .. .... .. .... .. ........... ......... .. ......... ... ................ 21 Figure 17. Amb to T1{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes ............................. 22 Figure 18. Amb to T1{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes ....... .. ......... ... ............... . 23 Figure 19. MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot .... ......... .. ................................ ...... ................................ ... 24 Fig ure 20. MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes .... ......... .. ............... .. ..... 25 Figure 21. MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes ...... .. ..................................... 26 Figure 22. Sus + E{1} Stress Ratio Plot (Seismic) ... .. .......... ...... .... ............ ....... .... ........ .. ........... 27 Figure 23. Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up (Seismic) , in Stainless Steel Piping ............. 28 Figure 24. Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up (Seismic) , in Alu minum Piping ... .. ............... 29 Figure 25. Imposed displacement on the Tower Side AutoPIPE model +z direction ... .. ............ 30 Figure 26. Imposed displacement on the Tower Side Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot +z direction ... .... .. .. ....... .... ... ..... ... ... ... .. ................... ........ .......... ................................. ..... ....... 31 Figure 27. Piping supports point numbers on Tower side ........ .................................................. 34 Figu re 28. Piping supports point numbers fo r Flex Joints and along the pool .... .. ............. .... .... 34 Figu re 29. Piping supports point numbers in the pool ........................ ........ ........................ .. ...... 35 Figure 30 . Anchor supports point numbers at the Heat Exchanger and Target interface .... .. .... 36 iv
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                            30441 R00030/A LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Flanged Valve Weight .... .... ................................... .. ...... .. ...... ...... .. ...... ... ...................... 12 Table 2. Pipe Properties ............................................................................................................ 12 Table 3. Material Properties ....... .......... .. ....... .. ......................... ................................ ............ ...... 12 Table 4. Loading Inputs ........................................................................................ .............. ....... 14 Table 5. ASME B31.3 Code Max Stress Result Summary ...................... .. ............................ .... 16 Table 6. Support Forces Summary for Normal Operation ......................................................... 32 Table 7. Support Forces Summary for Operation+ Seismic ..... .............. ........ .......................... 33 Table 8. Anchor Forces Summary ............................................................................................. 35 V
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report    30441 R00030/A ACRONYMS Acronym                                      Description AISC                      American Institute of Steel Construction ASCE                      American Society of Civil Engineering ASME                      American Society of Mechanical Engineering MDMT                      Minimum Design Metal Temperature GA                        General Atomics GR                        Gravity MDMT                      Minimum Design Metal Temperature p                          Pressure vi
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A 1      OBJECTIVE The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that the Mo-99 Target Cooling System for the Once-Through Approach as part of the Reactor-Based Molybdenum-99 Selective Gas Extraction (SGE) meets the requirements of the ASME B31 .3 2014 (Ref. 1) and seismic load conditions per ASCE 7-10 (Ref. 2).
Top level design requirements for the Mo-99 Target Cooling System are defined in the Molybdenum-99 Supply System Requirements Document (30441 S00001 ).
The Once-Through Approach design will be developed and demonstrated under the RB-MSS project, co-funded by the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE-NNSA) and Nordion (Canada) , Inc. It is intended that the MSS will be installed and operated at the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR) to begin production of commercially-significant quantities of Mo-99 (~3000 6-day Ci/week) by the beginning of 2018.
This document provides the pipe stress calculations for the primary cooling loop, see Figure 1, excluding equipment. The analysis was performed using Bentley AutoPIPE CONNECT Advance Edition Version 10.00.00.10, a specialized nonlinear finite element piping program . The resulting piping stresses were interpreted in accordance of ASME B31 .3 (Ref. 1) and ASCE 7-10 (Ref. 2) ,
for structural adequacy. The target housing and heat exchanger interface connection will be idealized with anchors at the flange points.
1
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report 30441 R00030/A Figure 1. Maly 99 Solidworks model 2      APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS Document Number          Document Title 30441S00001              Molybdenum-99 Supply System Requirements Document 3      INPUTS 3.1    General The following inputs were used for the calculations presented herein:
* Piping arrangements as depicted in Figure 2; "MURR Master Model. SLDASM",
SolidWorks .
2
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A
* Pipe sizes and material selection per "MURR Master Model.SLDASM" and as described in Section 5.3
* Component weights per "MURR Master Model.SLDASM" for pipe sizes and material selection .
3.2    Loads Operating and Seismic loads are based on the "Molybdenum-99 Supply System Requirements Document" (30441S00001), ASME B31 .3 (Ref. 1) and ASCE 7-10 (Ref. 2) and are as described in Section 6.
4      ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions are made for the structural evaluation of the piping of the target cooling system.
* All pumps , heat exchangers, and external connections will be modeled as anchors at interface connection points. This is an accurate depiction as the mechanical components can be considered rigid , with indefinite stiffness.
* All piping supports , vibration damping type, are modeled as line supports with no gaps and connected to rigid ground. This is an accurate depiction of this type of supports.
* Bio-Shield, CoStarTower and Bridge are rigid structures . This is an accurate depiction of said structures due to low seismic loading , maximum deflections of structures within areas of interest are estimated to be< 1/161h inch .
* Maximum seismic differential movement between CoStarTower/Bridge and Bio-Shield is
        < 2.0 inches. This is a conservative number, as lateral movement of the CoStarTower is estimated to be less than 1/81h inch at bridge elevation.
5        METHOD Seismic loading conditions will be defined per ASCE 7-10, and evaluated against ASME B31 .3 2014.
Two types of analysis were performed:
: 1. Rigid Support Structure:
3
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A o  Assumes that piping support structures , Bio-shield/pool, CoStarTower and bridge are rigid structures. No differential lateral displacements occurs between the individual structures during a seismic event.
o  Pipe analysis is performed in accordance with ASME 831 .3 and ASCE 7-10.
: 2. Flexible Support Structure o  Assumes that the Bioshield/pool and CoStarTower combined with the Bridge will laterally displace during a seismic event.
o  Pipe analysis is performed to evaluate stresses and adequacy of flexible piping. A forced displacement of 2 inches is applied to the piping located on the CoStarTower and Bridge side relative to the piping located and mounted on the Bio-Shield side to simulate differential movement between the two main structures during a seismic event. Analysis is performed in accordance with ASME 831.3 and ASCE 7-10.
Further description and results can be found in Section 7.
6      AUTOPIPE MODEL AutoPIPE model is generated from Solidworks 3-D model , "MURR Master Model.SLDASM",
October 12, 2016, with an update on December 5, 2016 to remove a subset of piping.
Figure 2 to Figure 7 show the Solidworks/AutoPIPE details of the piping system with the pool and frame hidden. Green symbols on AutoPIPE mode figures represent constraints on the piping .
4
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report      30441 R00030/A Figure 2. Solidworks Assembly (Red Box is the piping of interest) 5
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report    30441 R00030/A y
X Figure 3. AutoPIPE's model of the piping of interest 6
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report 30441 R00030/A Figure 4. Solidworks Level 3-4 up-close view 7
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A Valve connections from heat exchangers. Rigid Anchor connections on the ends.
Guide+ line Supports All other supports shown are Guide Supports Only Flexible Joints to simulate flexible piping. (Not shown on Solidworks model)
Figure 5. AutoPIPE Level 3-4 up-close view 8
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report 30441 R00030/A Figure 6. Solidworks model with pool hidden 9
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report            30441 R00030/A All other supports shown are Guide Supports Only From these flanges all piping in the negative Y direction is aluminum  ----__,J Flexible Joints to simulate flexible piping with anchors at target housing interface Figure 7. AutoPIPE model with pool hidden 6.1    Support Details As discussed in the assumptions, Rail Mount Vibration Damping Clamps will be modeled as guide supports with no gaps. An example is shown in Figure 8. Guide supports restrict the radial movement of the piping at that point.
Figure 9 shows the line stop value with no gaps in the axial direction of the piping. The line stop location is shown in the previous section. Line Stop supports restrict the axial movement of the piping at that point. Location of line stops are shown in the previous section.
10
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report              30441 R00030/A
            -          r-;;;;
r-R Ci ..      rtoi h, ..;,    (GQ
            ..............      r,ooJ c.... ..,.    ~
Figure 8. AutoPIPE Model Guide Support Value r'.l""- 3-*  r=
C.......w.,t. ro.-
                        -        r--;;;;
                        ... -        r,a
                        ,.....,      rtii Figure 9. AutoPIPE Model Line Stop Value 6.2    Valves and Flanges The valves in this model are flanged and rated at 150 lb with 3", and 4" sizing . See Table 1 for weights.
11
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report          30441 R00030/A Table 1. Flanged Valve Weight Size (inch)      Ball Valve (lbf)      Globe (lbf) 3                  N/A                82 4                  144                N/A Flanges are modeled as point elements (zero length) with weight and a weld neck connection specified.
6.3    Piping The system consists of three standard sizes. See Table 2 for properties and Figure 10 for pipe size. The entire model is assigned material properties of TP316L with the exception of the piping in the pool. Pool piping is AL-6061 T6.
Table 2. Pipe Properties Nominal                    Outer            Wall Size    Schedule    Diameter      Thickness                Material (inch)                    (inch)          (inch) 2          40          2.375          0.154                TP316L 3          40            3.5          0.216        TP316L or AL-6061 T6 4          40            4.5          0.237        TP316L or AL-6061 T6 Table 3. Material Properties Yield Strength  Ultimate Strength Material (ksi)              (ksi)
TP316L                25                  70 AL-6061 T6              35                  42 12
 
ENCLOS URE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report            30441 R00030/A Figure 10. Pipe sizes 6.4    Flexible Joints To account for independent seismic movement of the building relative to the pool , flexible piping is added to the piping connection at the bridge level. All flexible piping is 11 inches in length and flanged. A guide support is added with the flange connections on the non-flexible piping side.
Flexible piping stiffness values were based on GA test data. The following stiffness is applied
* Axial - 182 lb/in
* Shear - 14 lb/in (both directions)
* Torsional - Rigid
* Bending - Rigid (both directions)
                          /
13
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                  30441 R00030/A
      ...... d pont .
U*qfndiic.11~ .,.._
rAAil              ~ -*
r OIINte
* c>>< : r,ti'7r
                            ~
      ~o1t .... 1o.alobooir,g.,_...
Y,ehN,""'-n z........ l!ifMM, .
                                ~
r-T4oo r,<<iii OY ;  ~
                                                ,-----rfoo' r
OZ Fllng,td    r
                                                                        ~
r-otlF
      ,,_,,._,                      rRliill Y~        Rlfroe.1 .        ~
Figure 11 . Flexible joint input values 7                CALCUATION BODY 7.1              Operational Loading The system was analyzed subject to the following loading in Table 4.                                                      In addition to the temperature and pressure loads the piping system was also subjected to gravitational load . The liquid in the piping is assumed to be water.
Table 4. Loading Inputs Gravity                            Temperature                      Pressure                      Notes 1g                                    78 .8&deg;F                30 psig                  Ambient is 68&deg;F 7.2              Seismic Loads ASCE 7-10, Reference 2, shall serve as the seismic design guide for the installed and operated target cooling system at MURR.
7.2.1 Site Specific Criteria Location is Latitude 38.93166 and Longitude -92.3418 is based on Columbia , MO 65211
* Ip= 1.0 (attached to an occupancy II building/structure)
* Rp = 12 (ASCE 7-10 table 13.6-1; welded piping)
* ap = 2.5 (ASCE 7-10 table 13.6-1) 14
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report            30441 R00030/A
* Sos = 0.112g (Refs. 4 and 5- USGS APPENDIX A and APPENDIX B respectively)
* Site Class B (Rock, based on FEMA maps see Ref. 6 - APPENDIX C)
* z = 62.5 ft (Based on the Solidworks model the bottom of the building to top of the piping system)
* h = 70ft (Based on the Solidworks model from the bottom to the top of the building) 7 .2.2 Seismic Forces Seismic forces , FP, will be determined in accordance with Section 13.3 (Ref. 2) as follows:
Fp = 0.4apSosWo(1+2z/h)              (Eqn . 13.3-1, Ref. 2)
(Rp//p)
However, Fp will not be greater than: Fp = 1.6Sos/pWo              (Eqn . 13.3-2, Ref. 2) and , FP will not be less than :                                    (Eqn . 13.3-3, Ref. 2) where:
Fp = Seismic design force ap = Amplification factor Sos = Design spectral response acceleration, short period Wo = Dead load z = Attachment Height, relative to finished grade h = Roof Height, height of structure , relative to adjacent finished grade RP = Response modification factor
    /p = Importance factor Seismic Load per Section 12.4.2 (Ref. 2):
fa: pQE                                                          (Eqn . 12.4-3, Ref. 2)
Ev= 0.2Sos0                                                      (Eqn. 12.4-4, Ref. 2)*
where :
fa = Horizontal seismic load effect Ev = Vertical seismic load effect p  = 1.0 (Redundancy Factor)
OE = FP (Effect of horizontal seismic force)
Sos= Design spectral response acceleration at short period D = Dead Load (piping operating weight)
*Note: In addition of applying the two shear forces simultaneously, a conservative AutoPIPE default vertical factor of 0.5 was used. Vertical force can be calculated using ASCE 7-10 12.4-4 but is much smaller than 0.5 x shear direction . The higher value is used.
* Eh = 0.035g (Shear) 15
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                                               30441 R00030/A
* Ev = 0.0175g (Vertical)
Static Earthquatr                                                    w New          ModlySelected I      DoieteSelected I      DoleteAI    (
ASCE 2010 Ve nal C..o      S.iemk:Coda fectO<
X(g)    Y(g)    Z (g)        Si,,0- :                      IB        ..:l  r    q,Code :          I Et  ASCE 2010                  0.50            D.1115                I~          Facto, PP) :      ,-l l(~XXJ -        r- ~        :          p e.93166 Attachmerl Height (z) :      j62.500              Longh,de :        1*92341 80 Rod Height (h) :              j70.CXXl        r    Mopped Spocbol Rooponse(Ss) :
jo.17524 Conl)Ol,enl R._,_ (Rp) :      j12 0    ii An1>'fication Factcr (ap) :    -12500--        Maicinun Conoidefed Elllthquoke (Fe) :      jtCXXJOO M ~ Focio< (ij :              j1.CXXJ Show Locotion on Mop I
H..-,                                                    OK            Cancel            H.-i OK Figure 12. AutoPIPE Seismic Inputs and corresponding G levels 8              RESULTS 8.1            ASME B31.3 Code Stress Results The ASME 831 .3 code combinations results are documented in this section . Results in Table 5 show combinations with numbers in the name. Loading input is shown in Table 4. Occasional stress category is calculated by combining seismic with sustain load. Figures 13 through 24 show the stress ratio plots. The red circles indicate the general areas of the high stress . Within that circle the square box with crosshairs is the exact point of the high stress.
* GR - Gravity
* Amb to T1 - Ambient to Operating Temperature
* Max P - Max Pressure
* Sus - GR + Max P
* E - Seismic Load Table 5. ASME B31.3 Code Max Stress Result Summary Stress Stress/Stress              Node Combination                Category              Material          Stress (ksi)      Allowable                                                            Location  Figure Allowable Ratio            Number (ksi)
Y-Pipe, before  Figure GR + Max P{1}                Sustain                316L                  0.7              16.7                        0.04                AL 13 flexible  14 piping Inside Pool , on Figure GR + Max P{1}                Sustain            6061 -T6                1.0              12.7                      0.08              AL36 F -
expansion    15 loop 16
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A Stress Stress/Stress  Node Combination  Category  Material Stress (ksi) Allowable                          Location  Figure Allowable Ratio Number (ksi)
At Heat Figure Amb to T1{1}  Expansion  316L        3.2          25        0.13      AK03  Exchanger 17 Interface At SS to Al Figure Amb to T1{1}  Expansion  6061-T6      0.2          19        0.01      AH51      pipe 18 interface 3" to 2" y Figure Max P{1}      Hoop      316L        0.3        16.7        0.02      AL06 pipe      20 AIIAI  Figure Max P{1}      Hoop    6061-T6      0.3        12.7        0.02      AK46 piping    21 Y-piping  Figure Sus. + E1 {1} Occasion    316L        0.9        22.2        0.04      AL09-support    23 Inside Pool, on  Figure Sus. + E1{1}  Occasion  6061-T6      1.0          16.9        0.06      AH61N+
expansion    24 loop 17
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seism ic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                          30441R00030/A 8.1.1  ASME B31.3 Sustain Stress Ratio Plots
                                      ....... l'IIJ(SUI)
* 004.J MAX STRESS in SS
                                    * * .u ..
                                    * * -o ..
                                    .    ... UI                                              ,.,..- .
t II GR
* W*P(l )
MAX STRESS in Al Figure 13. GR+ MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot 18
 
ENC LOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                    30441 R00030/A Mt*W*l'{1}(9UI) l'l.ti*NAll-~lt Str...
* 0.0-0.2
          . 0.2-0 ...
* 0.40.11
          . O.M U a o..e-1.0
          .    , 1.0 S~(Marl
* Sk- :
1:.:
l c:ona,..;
MAX STRESS in SS Figure 14. GR+ MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes 19
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                            30441 R00030/A
----~---
H * -l'tllC-U.)
0,CMU O.J.0 4 0 4U
. OM.I
. u.1.0
* *Ut Iii -                                t II
                                                                                                ~"4-1 * ;,
Allio :
C:.-.:
12100 O.OI GA*M*fltl) 6fl+MeoP(1}
Figure 15. GR+ MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes 20
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                        30441 R00030/A 8.1 .2 ASME 831.3 Expansion Stress Ratio Plots W II
                                  . 0 .24.*
                                  . 0.40.8
                                  . O.Mt.l
* G.9* 1.0
                                  . .. ,.o MAX STRES S in SS MAX STRESS in Al
                                        ':J....
Figure 16. Amb to T1{1} Stress Ratio Plot 21
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                    30441 R00030/A
        ..,.. , . 11{tl (JXI')
        "***-l>l*h..
      .a o02."'.41*.
* 0.0.0 .2
* D.1 .0
      * *t.o MAX STRESS in SS y
:-l.
Figure 17. Amb to T1{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes 22
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                            30441 R00030/A a ooe.a
. U0.<11
. 040
. HO.I
* 0.1*1.0
                                                                                                              ' a '
l'l:li"t . AH51 .
[--~-                  JIiii S-. :                195
                                                                                  ..... :            250!!0 Allio :              Qtn Ca,a,. *    .... 111 11nJ MAX STRESS in Al Figure 18. Amb to T1{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes 23
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                        30441 R00030/A 8.1.3  ASME 831.3 Hoop Stress Ratio Plots
                                  ........ ..._..... SR.
a o.0.0.2
                                  . G.2-0-"
                                  .o    ..
                                  . 04U a uu                                11 -
                                            ,.o
                                  * *1.0                                Ptwll :    AUl6 HooplM.J
* plli SlteN :            31 4 Abt. :          16700 F1411io :        am CGll'lbil\:  M*POJ MAX STRESS in Al Figure 19. MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot 24
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Ana lysis Design Calculation Report                                            30441 R00030/A lil*"tllOiOOI')
l(.i.. " - * - -
. 00,0.J
. 02.0.*
.o. .,
a o.011
. 01-1 0
*    *u Pon :      Al.06 HOCPIM*I
* pli
                                                                                            , s._ :                JU Aloi,,! :          1670)
                                                                                            ' R<<o :              0.02
:c.ontiin : M1111P{1 )
Figure 20. MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Stainless Steel Pipes 25
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                          30441 R00030/A
  -l'(l)(WOOI')
. uu
      *-.2
.    ....a.
. ...1,
**u 11 *-                      ' .
M,,t.
* A* :
Celcih.;
N,.C -
                                                                                      't:,."'_. . ,. m 1000 o.m:
MaP"(I)
MAX STRESS in Al Figure 21 . MaxP{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up, Aluminum Pipes 26
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                    30441 R00030/A 8.1.4  ASME 831.3 Occasional Stress Ratio Plots lw.*11{1)(0CC)
                          ,-o111,1itA11-,kft**
                          . 0..0-0.2
                          . 0.2-0.,
                          .o
                          . J,..0
                          . 040.4
                          . 0.6-0.I
                                    ,.o Pon :  AH61N*
DCCNional:IM*I
* PIii SIMM :            Bl9        1028 Alow.:
R.rio :
C<<ia\:
16891 005 S1&
* El{H om; S*
* E1fH MAX STRESS in Al
                                  ' ~.
Figure 22. Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot (Seismic) 27
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                30441 R00030/A Sv.i. .. &#xa3;1111 (OCC)
R.WoMAII-W.h..:
                . OJM>.2
                . 0.2-(J..1
                . Q.4,0 _8
                . 0.0-0.1
* U -1.0
                * *1.G Point :  Al.09 .
O~IM*l
* pa s11.. :
Alo#.:
Allio ;
Conti\:
ees 2221 1 0.04 Sua.
* E1(1}
883 22211 Sut.* EHH MAX STRESS in SS Figure 23. Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up (Seismic), in Stainless Steel Piping 28
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                    30441 R00030/A Sw..*11f1JCO'C) lt,hle....,_DllS-..:
. 00-0.2
. 0 .2-0.<I
. 040.D
* o.e.o.i
. 0 .. 1.0
* *1.0 W t1 I Pon: :    AH6l N
* AH61N +
Occeaicrie1"4eicJ
* PIii si,. :                81S            1028 Abt.;
Rlllio :
Cona,.*
16891 O.D5 Sw.. + E1 (1)          """
006 S1a.
* E1l1l Figure 24. Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot Close Up (Seismic), in Aluminum Piping 29
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A 8.2    Seismic Displacement The design of the system shows that the tower and the pool are two independent structures.
During a seismic event these structures will displace independently. To alleviate stress caused from independent movement, flexible piping was added at the pool/tower interface (towards the pool side) . To verify the flexible piping doesn't induce stresses , an analysis with an imposed displacement was done. A two inch imposed displacement was applied independently on the Tower side of the flexible piping in +/- x and +/- z direction. Figure 25 and Figure 26 show the AutoPIPE model and the Seismic results. As shown in the results box in Figure 26, the two inch imposed displacement has negligible effects on the stress ratio (Max ratio is 0.05 on the AH42F+ ).
Therefore the flexible piping design is working as intended. The other three directions are similar and are not shown since stress ratios are low.
Tower Side y
Figure 25. Imposed displacement on the Tower Side AutoPIPE model +z direction 30
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report    30441 R00030/A t-*ltft)(O(.C)
  * *u*.
  .- ..~1..0t.
  . ..u
                                                                                    ~ "-
II I!
11 MAX STRESS in SS Figure 26. Imposed displacement on the Tower Side Sus+ E{1} Stress Ratio Plot +z direction 9              SUPPORTANDANCHORLOADS The following section shows the support force during operation and operation plus seismic calculations . Operation is Gravity + Temperature + Pressure (Gravity, Expansion, and Hoop).
Table 6 and Table 7 show a summary of the forces of the two cases. Figures 27 through 29 show the point numbers associated with the support. Please note these cases are not the same as the combination code stress.
31
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report        30441 R00030/A Table 6. Support Forces Summary for Normal Operation Support Location Type Case      X (lbf)    y (lbf)  z (lbf)
AH19    Guide  Operation      -2      -115        7 AH30    Guide  Operation      -13      -218      57 AH30    Line Stp Operation      279        0        65 AH36    Guide  Operation        2      -193      -10 AH83    Guide  Operation      63        -80      -1 AH41    Guide  Operation    -310        -85        3 AH84    Guide  Operation        0        -33        0 AH84    Line Stp Operation      235        0        0 AH85    Line Stp Operation        0      -317        0 AH85    Guide  Operation      11        0        -1 AK08    Guide  Operation        0        199      853 AK16    Guide  Operation      41      -154    -177 AK16    Line Stp Operation      627        0      146 AK17    Guide  Operation      -2      -102      10 AK21    Guide  Operation      13      -135        0 AK24    Guide  Operation      -60      -207        0 AK47    Guide  Operation      16      -166      -19 AK40    Guide  Operation      35        173      29 AK40    Line Stp Operation      -16        0        19 AK52    Line Stp Operation        0      -673        0 AK52    Guide  Operation      13        0      -29 AL09    Guide  Operation      11      -218      -47 AL09    Line Stp Operation      242        0        57 AL14    Guide  Operation        0      -156        1 AL63    Guide  Operation      86        -59      -1 AL19    Guide  Operation    -355        -88        4 AL64    Guide  Operation        0        -57      -7 AL64    Line Stp Operation      259        0        0 AL65    Line Stp Operation        0      -303        0 AL65    Guide  Operation      10        0        4 32
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report          30441 R00030/A Table 7. Support Forces Summary for Operation+ Seismic Support Location Type Case        X (lbf) y (lbf) z (lbf)
AH19      Guide    Operation + Seismic    -2    -112    11 AH30      Guide    Operation + Seismic  -15    -213    64 AH30    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic  300      0      70 AH36      Guide    Operation + Seismic    1    -189      -5 AH83      Guide    Operation + Seismic    67    -78      -1 AH41      Guide    Operation + Seismic  -350    -85      4 AH84      Guide    Operation + Seismic    0    -27      6 AH84    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic  277      0        0 AH85    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic    0    -316      0 AH85      Guide    Operation + Seismic    23      0        9 AK08      Guide    Operation + Seismic    0    200    855 AK16      Guide    Operation + Seismic    41    -151    -175 AK16    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic  639      0      149 AK17      Guide    Operation + Seismic    -3    -100      13 AK21    Guide    Operation + Seismic    13    -133      0 AK24    Guide    Operation + Seismic  -45    -203      0 AK47    Guide    Operation + Seismic    -8    -158      10 AK40    Guide    Operation + Seismic    32    158      27 AK40    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic    1      0      -1 AK52    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic    0    -655      0 AK52    Guide    Operation + Seismic    42      0        0 AL09    Guide    Operation + Seismic    10    -214    -41 AL09    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic  262      0      61 AL14    Guide    Operation + Seismic    -1    -153      4 AL63    Guide    Operation+ Seismic    90    -57      -1 AL19    Guide    Operation + Seismic  -386    -88      4 AL64    Guide    Operation + Seismic    0    -51      0 AL64    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic  291      0        0 AL65    Line Stp  Operation + Seismic    0    -301      0 AL65      Guide  Operation + Seismic    22      0      14 33
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report      30441 R00030/A Figure 27. Piping supports point numbers on Tower side Figure 28. Piping supports point numbers for Flex Joints and along the pool 34
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report          30441 R00030/A Figure 29. Piping supports point numbers in the pool As stated in the assumptions , interfaces were modeled as rigid anchors. Table 8 and Figure 30 show the anchor forces and the point numbers.
Table 8. Anchor Forces Summary Location Support Case X- force  Y- force z. force X- moment  y. moment  Z- moment Type                              (lbf)      (lbf)    (lbf)    (ft-lb)    (ft-lb)    (ft-lb)
AH08      Anchor        Operation          -519      -350    -130      459      -1076        -74 AK02      Anchor        Operation          -666      -437    -833      530      -1253        18 AH80      Anchor        Operation            1        -67      -1        -5        -4        -17 AL60    Anchor        Operation            1        -68        0          3        -2        -24 AH08      Anchor    Operation + Seismic    -51 1      -346    -122      455      -1070        -74 AK02      Anchor    Operation + Seismic    -660      -434    -826      529      -1250        18 AH80      Anchor    Operation + Seismic      4        -66        3        -13        -2        -8 AL60    Anchor    Operation + Seismic      4        -68        3        -5        -2        -16 35
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report              30441 R00030/A Inside the Pool
                                                                    ~* "r Heat Exchanger
* y
                                                                    ~
Interface Figure 30. Anchor supports point numbers at the Heat Exchanger and Targe t interface 10      CONCLUSIONS The target cooling water system piping was modeled in AutoPIPE with the operational, and ASCE 7-10 seismic loading. The results shows that piping passes ASME B31 .3 2014 piping stress code.
Additionally, the analysis shows that the flexible piping located at the bridge to Bio-Shield/Pool interface alleviates stress cause from independent movement of the tower and bio-shield during a seismic event and allows for an up to 2 inch movement, which is ample margin. Overall, the piping analysis shows that there is a large margin in the stress allowable, with a Factor of Safety (FoS) > 7.
11      REFERENCES Reference Document Number          Description 1      ASCE 7-10              Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures 2      ASME B31.3              Process Piping, 2014 Edition 3      30441S00001              Moved to Applicable Documents Section 4      USGS                    Design Maps Detail Report 5      USGS                    Design Maps Summary Report 6      FEMA                    FEMA Hazard Maps 36
 
ENCLOSURE l Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                            30441 R00030/A APPENDIX A USGS DESIGN MAPS DETAIL REPORT 12113/2016                                                    OesilJI Maps Detailed Report lJSGS          Design Maps Detailed Report ASCE 7-10 Standard ( 38.93166&deg;N , 92.34 18&deg;W)
Site Class B - "Rode", Risk category I/II/III Sect ion 11.4 .1 - Mapped Acceleration Pa rameters Note: Ground motion values provided below are for the direction of maximum horizontal spectral response aoceleration. They have been converted from corresponding geometric mean ground motions computed by the USGS by applying factors of 1.1 (to obtain Ss} and 1.3 (to obtain S 1 ) . Maps in the 2010 ASCE.-7 Standard are provided for Site dass B.
Adjustments for other Site Classes are made, as needed, in Section 11.4.3.
From Figure 22-1 111                                                                          Ss  = 0.168 g From Figure 22-2 12 1                                                                        S1  = 0 .093 g Sect ion 11.4.2 - Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not t he USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has dassified the site as Site dass B, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Chapter 20.
Table 20 .3-1 Site Classifi cation Site Class                                                  vs                    N or Nc1,          Su A. Hard Rock                                        >5,000 ft/s                    N/A            N/A B. Rock                                          2,500 to 5,000 ft/s                N/A            N/A C. Very dense soil and soft rock                1,200 to 2, 500 ft/s                >50        >2,000 psf D. Stiff Soil                                    600 to 1,200 ft/s              15 to 50  1,000 to 2,000 psf E. Soft d ay soil                                      <600 ft/s                    < 15        <1,000 psf Any profi le with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics:
* Plasticity index PI > 20,
* Mo isture content w ~ 40%, and
* Undrained shear strength s . < 500 psf F. Soils requiring site response                                        See Section 20.3.1 analysis in accordance with Section 21.1 Fo r SI : 1ft/s = 0. 3048 m/s l ib/ft>  ~  0 .0479 kN/ m 2 A-1
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                                30441 R00030/A 12/13/2011!                                                          OHiS,, Maps DM.Jiled Repcrt Sect ion 11 .4.3 - Sit e Coefficients and Risk- Targeted Max imum Considered Earthq uake
(,MCE~) Spect ral Response Accelerat ion Pa ram eters Table 11 .4-1: Site Coefficient F.
Site dass            Mapped MCE        R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at Short Period 5s  S 0.25          5s = 0 .50        5s =  0 .75        5s =  1.00          5s  ~  1.25 A                  0.8                  0 .8              0 .8                  0.8                  0.8 B                  1.0                1.0                1.0                  1.0                  1.0 C                  1.2                1.2                1.1                  1.0                  1.0 D                  1.6                1.4                1.2                  1.1                  1.0 E                  2.5                  1.7                1.2                  0.9                  0.9 F                                          see Section  11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Not e: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of                  Ss For Site Class = B and S 5 = 0 . 1 6 8 g, F. = 1.000 Table 11.4-2: Site Coefficient F, Site Class            Mapped MCE        R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1-s Period s, S 0 .10            s, = 0 .20        s, = 0.30            s, = 0.40            s, ~ 0 .50 A                  0.8                  0.8              0.8                  0.8                  0.8 B                  1.0                1.0                1.0                  1.0                  1.0 C                  1.7                1.6                1.5                  1.4                  1.3 D                  2 .4                2.0                1.8                  1.6                  1.5 E                  3 .5                3 .2              2 .8                  2.4                  2.4 F                                          see Section  11.4. 7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of S 1 For Site Class= B an d S 1 = 0 .093 g, F,          =  1.000 htipo :Hear1hqwl<e.usgs.go,,ldesignmapslus/report.p,p?lemplu= minimal&l.aii1Ude=3Ul3111G&longitude=*G2.3418&sileelau= 1&riskc.,iego,y=O&edition=asce-2... 2/0 A-2
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                      30441 R00030/A Equation (11.4- 1):                                  SMS = F.ss = 1.000 x 0.168 = 0.168 g Equation (11,4-2):                                  SHI = FySl = 1.000 X 0.093 = 0.093 g Section 11.4.4 - Des ign Spectral Accelerati on Parameters Equation (11.4-3):                                      Sos = % SMs = o/s X 0.168 = 0.112 g Equation (11.4-4):                                      S01 = Y. S,41 = Y. X 0.093 = 0.062 g Section 11.4.5 - Des ign Response Spect rum From Figure 22- 12 r3 1                                                                TL = 12 seconds Figu re 11.4-1: Des ign Response Spectrum T
* T, ,s, : *-.( 0,4
* 0.8T IT,)
T,sTs T*. s, -s..
S
* O. ll 2                                    T1 < T :s T, : S,
* S0 1 IT
{
T>l, : S,= S01T, IT' So,* 0.062 T, - O.lll      T, = 0.554    1. 000 Period, T (sec)
A-3
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                        30441 R00030/A 12/13/2016 Section 11.4.6 - Risk-Targeted Maximum Cons idered Earthquake (MCER) Response Spectrum The MCE* Responae Spectrum is determined by multiplying the design response spectrum above by 1.5.
t s..1 - 0.093 I"
ct j
T, *0.11 1    T,
* 0.554    1.000 Perlod.T(sed A-4
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                      30441 R00030/A 12/13/2010                                                Oesig, Maps Detailed Repa, Section 11.8.3 - Ad ditional Geotechnical Investigation Report Requirement s for Seismic Design Categories D through F From    figure 22-Z 14 1                                                                PGA    = 0.080 Equation (11.8-1):                                  PG~ = FPGAPGA = 1.000 x 0. 080 = 0.08 g Table 11 .8-1 : Site Coefficient F"""
Site              Mapped MCE Geometric Mean Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA dass PGA :5: 0.10    PGA  = 0.20        PGA  = 0 .30        PGA  = 0.40 PGA 2: 0 .50 A            0 .8            0.8                0.8                  0 .8      0.8 B            1.0            1.0                1 .0                  1.0        1.0 C            1.2            1.2                1.1                  1.0        1.0 D            1.6            1.4                1.2                  1.1        1.0 E            2 .5            1.7                1.2                  0.9        0.9 F                              See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight-line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA For Site Class= Band PGA        = 0 . 080 g, F * .,.. = 1 .000 Section 21.2.1.1 - Method 1 (from Chapter 21 - Site-Specific Ground Motion Procedures for Seismic Design)
From figure      22-17 151                                                                ~    = 0.862 From Figure 22- 18 16 1                                                                  Cii1 = 0.835 A-5
 
ENCLOSURE 1 Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                    30441 R00030/A 1211:112i11e                                              Design M~ Data/loci R ~
Section 11.6 - Seismic Design Category Table 11.6-1 Seism ic Design Category Based on Short Period Response Acceleration Parameter RISK CATEGORY VALUE OF S., 5 I or II                III                  IV S 05  < 0.167g                  A                    A                    A 0 .167g S S 05 < 0 .33g              B                    B                    C 0.33g S S 05    < 0 .50g            C                    C                    0 0.50g S S 05                  0                    0                    0 For Risk Category= I and S05 = 0.112 g , Seismic Design Category= A Table 11.6-2 Seismic Design Category Based on 1-S Period Res ponse Acceleration Parameter RISK CATEGORY VALUE OF S 01 I or II                III                  IV s ... < 0 .067g                A                    A                    A 0.067g S s.,. < 0 .133g                B                    B                    C 0.133g S s.,. < 0.20g                C                    C                    0 0.20g S    s...                0                    0                    0 For Risk Category = I and S 01 = 0.062 g , Seismic Design Category = A Note: Whens, is greater than or equal to 0.75g, the Seismic Design category is E for buildings in Risk categories I, Il, and Ill, and F for those in Risk category IV, irrespective of the above.
Seismic Design Category      = Kthe more severe design category in accordance with Table 11.6- 1 or 11.6-2" = A Note: See Section 11.6 for alternative approaches to calculating Seismic Design category.
References
: 1. Figure 22-1: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-1 .pdf
: 2. Figure 22-2: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-2 .pdf
: 3. Figure 22 -12 : http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-12.pdf
: 4. Figure 22-7: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-7.pdf
: 5. Figure 22-17: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/20 10_ASCE-7_Figure_22-17 .pdf
: 6. Figure 22-18 : http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/20 lO_ASCE- 7_Figure_22-18.pdf A-6
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seismic Analysis Design Calculation Report                                                                                    30441 R00030/A APPENDIX B USGS MAPS
 
==SUMMARY==
REPORT 12/13/20 6                                                                    Design MiJPs St.mmary Repon lJSGS            Design Maps Summary Report User - Specifi ed Input Buildi ng Code Reference Document ASCE 7-10 Standard (which utilizes USGS hazard data available ,n 2008)
Site Coord inates 38.93 166&deg; N, 92 .3418&deg;W Sit e Soil Classifi cati on Site dass B - ~Rockn Risk Category              J/II/IIJ USGS-Provi de d Output s,=        0 .1689                    SMs  =    0.168 g                          Sos=        0.112 g s, =      0.093 g                    s ... =    0. 093 g                          s...    =  0.062 g For information on how the SS and Sl values above have been calculated from p robabilistic (risk-targeted) and deterministic ground motions in the directio n of maxim u m h orizontal respo nse, please return ID the application and select the "2009 NEHRP" build ing code reference document.
M CE 11 Respon se Sp ectrum                                                          Design Res pon se Sp ectrnm OU                                                                                    0 .12 0 1' OU                                                                                    0 .1 0 G.1 2                                                                                o oa
      '.!  0 10
                                                                                        '.!II Ill 0 08 Ill    0  o, 0 0G                                                                                  0  o, 0 04 0 02
: 0. 02
: 0. 00 _ _ _ _ _ _ __,_        ........_...__,_ _ _ _+--<
0 .00 ,l----,>--+--+--,--+--+---s>---+--+--
0 00 0 20 t 40 0 ,o O.to l 00 I 20 I      ,o  I ,o  1 10 2.00                          000 0 20 0 ~ 0~ 0 to l 00 1 20 l        ~  l ~ l to ~OO Period, T ( Hcl                                                                    Period, T (s.c)
For PGA,.. T, ,    c*., and c. , value!:,      please view  the detailed report.
Although th,s information ts a product of the U.S . Geological Surve y, \.,e pJ'Ovlde no warranty, expressed 01 im plied , as to the accuracy of the data cont~ined the.rein . This tool is not a substitute for technica l subjed -matte r lc:nowledge..
heps ://eanhqua!<e.U5lls.gcw,-ignm ops,      summary.J>l,p?tem pl3!!!"'ffl irimal&l,..tudea38..113 1l!MlongiWdl,a-ll2.3418&.sil!Class* l &ri skc.mgo,y*O&~tiOIP'asc. .. 1/1 8 -1
 
ENCLOSURE I Mo-99 Target Cooling System Seism ic Analysis Design Calculation Report                      30441 R00030/A APPENDIX C FEMA MAPS Earthquake Hazard Maps I FEMA.gov                                                Page 3 of7 program-managers-tool ft.
earthquake-program-managers)
                  > Information 0
lndMd als (tea    uake-i formation-ind.Mduals-a d-amiliesJ In orma *on for Comm
* ies (learthqua e-informatio comm      ies)
                  > lnformatio for Busi sses
(/earthquake-i formation-businesses-and-othe -
o ganizations)
In ormation for Building
                                            --t- -:-
SOC map of the Eastern United States for low-rise Desig rs
(/earthqua        Occupancy Category I and 11 structures located on sites lnforma io building-          with average alluvial soil condit ions.
designers-managers-and-regulators)
Earthquake Hazard Maps
(/earthquake-hazard-maps)
Your Ea quake Risk (/your-earthq ake-rlsk) hnps://www.fema.gov/earthquake-hazard-maps                                        12/8/2016 C-1}}

Latest revision as of 04:56, 7 January 2025

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18022A260&oldid=5039868"