IR 05000395/2015502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/20/2015
| issue date = 10/20/2015
| title = IR 05000395/2015502; on 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
| title = IR 05000395/2015502; on 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
| author name = Bonser B R
| author name = Bonser B
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
| addressee name = Gatlin T D
| addressee name = Gatlin T
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
| docket = 05000395
| docket = 05000395
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:October 20, 2015
[[Issue date::October 20, 2015]]


Mr. ThomasVice President - Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station P.O. Box 88 (Mail Code 800) Jenkinsville, SC  29065
==SUBJECT:==
 
VIRGIL C. SUMMER UNIT 1 NUCLEAR STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000395/2015502
SUBJECT:   VIRGIL C. SUMMER UNIT 1 NUCLEAR STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000395/2015502


==Dear Mr. Gatlin:==
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:==
Line 29: Line 27:
documents the inspection results that were discussed on September 24, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.
documents the inspection results that were discussed on September 24, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.


No findings were identified during this inspection. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding," of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
No findings were identified during this inspection.


Sincerely,/RA/
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Brian R. Bonser, Chief       Plant Support Branch 1       Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12  
 
Sincerely,
/RA/  
 
Brian R. Bonser, Chief  
 
Plant Support Branch 1  
 
Division of Reactor Safety  
 
Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
IR 05000395/2015502  
IR 05000395/2015502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information
 
REGION II==
Docket No:
05000395
 
License No:
NPF-12
 
Report No:
05000395/2015502
 
Licensee:
South Carolina Electric and Gas
 
Facility:
Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1
 
Location:
Jenkinsville, SC
 
Dates:
September 21-25, 2015
 
Inspectors:
Steven Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
 
Christopher Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector
 
Wade Loo, Senior Health Physicist Inspector
 
James Reece, Senior Resident inspector
 
Approved by:


===w/Attachment:===
Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
Supplementary Information  cc:  Distribution via Listserv October 20, 2015  Mr. Thomas


=SUMMARY=
=SUMMARY=
Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2015502; 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection   This report covers an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist inspector, and one senior resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 5. No findings were identified during this inspection.
Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2015502; 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear  
 
Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection  
 
This report covers an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist inspector, and one senior resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5.
 
No findings were identified during this inspection.


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=


==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==
 
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone:===
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
Emergency Preparedness 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
* The adequacy of the licensee's performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on September 22, 2015, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
* The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on September 22, 2015, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
* The overall adequacy of the licensee's emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, "Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities," and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility.
* The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center, Operations Support Center, and Emergency Operations Facility.
* Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organization's (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra- and inter- facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
* Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
* The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on September 24, 2015, to evaluate the licensee's self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g. The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
* The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on September 24, 2015, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
 
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes
1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes


Line 66: Line 112:
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, several revisions were made to the Radiological Emergency Plan. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the changes and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate for potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.
Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, several revisions were made to the Radiological Emergency Plan. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the changes and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate for potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.


The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC inspection procedure (IP) 71114, Attachment 04, "Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes."  The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.
The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC inspection procedure (IP) 71114, 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.


The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level, and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level, and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
No findings were identified.
 
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, "Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review," to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the  
 
exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise  
 
Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements  


The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
 
The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 83: Line 137:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
{{a|4OA1}}
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification==
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification==
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period April 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period April 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.


Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
* Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
* Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
* Emergency Response Organization
* Emergency Response Organization
* Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS) For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensee's records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.
* Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)  
 
For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the  
. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
 
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
On September 24, 2015, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Gatlin and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.
On September 24, 2015, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Gatlin and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.


ATTACHMENT:
ATTACHMENT:  


=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION=
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
===Licensee personnel===
: [[contact::M. Cekovsky]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist
: [[contact::M. Coleman]], Manager, Radiation Protection and Safety
: [[contact::G. Douglass]], Manager, Nuclear Protection Services
: [[contact::M. Fanguy]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist
: [[contact::T. Gatlin]], Vice President, Nuclear Operations
: [[contact::M. Harmon]], Manager, Chemistry Services
: [[contact::L. Harris]], Manager, Quality Systems
: [[contact::R. Haselden]], General Manager, Organizational / Development Effectiveness
: [[contact::R. Justice]], Manager, Nuclear Operations
: [[contact::G. Lippard]], General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations
: [[contact::E. Moore]], Emergency Preparedness Specialist
: [[contact::M. Moore]], Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing
: [[contact::R. Ray]], Manager, Planning and Support
: [[contact::S. Reese]], Licensing Specialist
: [[contact::D. Shue]], Manager, Maintenance Services
: [[contact::W. Stuart]], General Manager, Engineering Services
: [[contact::T. Tharp]], Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness
: [[contact::B. Thompson]], Manager, Nuclear Licensing
: [[contact::R. Williamson]], Manager, Emergency Preparedness
: [[contact::S. Zarandi]], General Manager, Nuclear Support Services
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED
None
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==


}}
}}

Latest revision as of 06:58, 10 January 2025

IR 05000395/2015502; on 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
ML15293A342
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/20/2015
From: Brian Bonser
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
To: Gatlin T
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633
References
IR 2015502
Download: ML15293A342 (11)
v • d • e


Text

October 20, 2015

SUBJECT:

VIRGIL C. SUMMER UNIT 1 NUCLEAR STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000395/2015502

Dear Mr. Gatlin:

On September 25, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The enclosed inspection report (IR)

documents the inspection results that were discussed on September 24, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.

No findings were identified during this inspection.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding, of the NRC's "Agency Rules of Practice and Procedure," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Brian R. Bonser, Chief

Plant Support Branch 1

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-395 License Nos. NPF-12

Enclosure:

IR 05000395/2015502 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information

REGION II==

Docket No:

05000395

License No:

NPF-12

Report No:

05000395/2015502

Licensee:

South Carolina Electric and Gas

Facility:

Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, Unit 1

Location:

Jenkinsville, SC

Dates:

September 21-25, 2015

Inspectors:

Steven Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Christopher Fontana, Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Wade Loo, Senior Health Physicist Inspector

James Reece, Senior Resident inspector

Approved by:

Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety

SUMMARY

Inspection Report (IR) 05000395/2015502; 9/21/2015 - 9/25/2015; V.C. Summer Nuclear

Station, Unit 1; Exercise and Baseline Inspection

This report covers an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist inspector, and one senior resident inspector. No findings of significance were identified. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5.

No findings were identified during this inspection.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP1 Exercise Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:

  • The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on September 22, 2015, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10); which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
  • Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
  • The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on September 24, 2015, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, several revisions were made to the Radiological Emergency Plan. The licensee determined that, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b) and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the changes and sampled implementing procedure changes to evaluate for potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report, and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC inspection procedure (IP) 71114, 04, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level, and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the

exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise

Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements

of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

The inspectors reviewed various documents, which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period April 1, 2014, through June 30, 2015. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.

Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone

  • Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
  • Emergency Response Organization
  • Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)

For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the

. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On September 24, 2015, the inspection team presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Gatlin and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

M. Cekovsky, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
M. Coleman, Manager, Radiation Protection and Safety
G. Douglass, Manager, Nuclear Protection Services
M. Fanguy, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
T. Gatlin, Vice President, Nuclear Operations
M. Harmon, Manager, Chemistry Services
L. Harris, Manager, Quality Systems
R. Haselden, General Manager, Organizational / Development Effectiveness
R. Justice, Manager, Nuclear Operations
G. Lippard, General Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations
E. Moore, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
M. Moore, Supervisor, Nuclear Licensing
R. Ray, Manager, Planning and Support
S. Reese, Licensing Specialist
D. Shue, Manager, Maintenance Services
W. Stuart, General Manager, Engineering Services
T. Tharp, Supervisor, Emergency Preparedness
B. Thompson, Manager, Nuclear Licensing
R. Williamson, Manager, Emergency Preparedness
S. Zarandi, General Manager, Nuclear Support Services

ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, DISCUSSED, AND UPDATED

None

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000395/2015502&oldid=5181263"