ML19312D079: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:8 ;,.. | {{#Wiki_filter:8 ;,.. | ||
TENNECCEE VAll..EY ' AUTHORITY | TENNECCEE VAll..EY ' AUTHORITY | ||
- CHATTANOOGA. .T5 NNESSEE 37jol. ... , . | - CHATTANOOGA. .T5 NNESSEE 37jol. ... , . | ||
| Line 27: | Line 23: | ||
February1i),F198F R 2 All : l5 t | February1i),F198F R 2 All : l5 t | ||
Mr. ' James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II - Suite 3100- i 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Mr. ' James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II - Suite 3100- i 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | ||
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:== | ==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:== | ||
| Line 35: | Line 30: | ||
We. have reviewed the subject inspection repo*t and find no proprietary information in the report. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jim Domer at FTS 854-2014. | We. have reviewed the subject inspection repo*t and find no proprietary information in the report. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jim Domer at FTS 854-2014. | ||
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DM. | Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DM. | ||
. M. Mills, Man er Nuclear Regulati n and Safety Enclosure l | . M. Mills, Man er Nuclear Regulati n and Safety Enclosure l | ||
l l | l l | ||
| Line 41: | Line 35: | ||
9 | 9 | ||
/ | / | ||
s003190 7f g An Equal Opportunity Employer OFFICIAL C#PY | s003190 7f g An Equal Opportunity Employer OFFICIAL C#PY | ||
7_. | 7_. | ||
4- .c t; , | 4- .c t; , | ||
ENCLOSURE L _ -p. | ENCLOSURE L _ -p. | ||
FINAL' RESPONSE TO NRC-0IE LETTER FROM'C. E. MURPHY TO H. G. PARRIS | FINAL' RESPONSE TO NRC-0IE LETTER FROM'C. E. MURPHY TO H. G. PARRIS | ||
~ | ~ | ||
| Line 61: | Line 48: | ||
t This report responds to the Notice of Violation described in. Appendix A J of the'01E Inspection Report referenced above. This is;the final response on the subject noncompliance. | t This report responds to the Notice of Violation described in. Appendix A J of the'01E Inspection Report referenced above. This is;the final response on the subject noncompliance. | ||
~ | ~ | ||
Noncompliance. Item - Infraction 518/79-28-01 As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and as. implemented by PSAR Section 17.la.5, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, . . . and shall be accomplished in | |||
Noncompliance. Item - Infraction 518/79-28-01 | |||
As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and as. implemented by PSAR Section 17.la.5, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, . . . and shall be accomplished in | |||
.accordance with those instructions, procedures, . . ." .TVA Procedure SOP-34, Revision 1, requires _that prior to the commencing of welding . . . th'e j welding inspector shall verify that.the proper preheat is being used . . . i and shall record this un the weld operation checklist. | .accordance with those instructions, procedures, . . ." .TVA Procedure SOP-34, Revision 1, requires _that prior to the commencing of welding . . . th'e j welding inspector shall verify that.the proper preheat is being used . . . i and shall record this un the weld operation checklist. | ||
Contrary to the above, on December 12, 1979, preheat inspection had been | Contrary to the above, on December 12, 1979, preheat inspection had been signed off for veld DVS00035 at a time when the welder was not ready to commence welding. | ||
signed off for veld DVS00035 at a time when the welder was not ready to commence welding. | |||
This is an infraction. | This is an infraction. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 58: | ||
properly monitoring and providing preheat to weld joints by utilizing ! | properly monitoring and providing preheat to weld joints by utilizing ! | ||
temperature indicating crayons. As a result, Hartsville_ quality j | temperature indicating crayons. As a result, Hartsville_ quality j | ||
;l contro1~ welding unit personnel believe that the weld in question is | ;l contro1~ welding unit personnel believe that the weld in question is acceptable. ! | ||
acceptable. ! | |||
: 2. Corrective Stps Taken-to Avoid Further Noncompliance | : 2. Corrective Stps Taken-to Avoid Further Noncompliance | ||
~ | ~ | ||
~ | ~ | ||
Both inspection and craft personne1 were reminded of preheat requirements. | Both inspection and craft personne1 were reminded of preheat requirements. | ||
- Additionally, inspection personnel were instructed to determine and | - Additionally, inspection personnel were instructed to determine and ensure that the welder is prepared to commence welding before signing | ||
ensure that the welder is prepared to commence welding before signing | |||
, acceptance of preheat inspection. | , acceptance of preheat inspection. | ||
~ | ~ | ||
3 .~ Date When Fu11' Compliance Was Achieved Full compliance was achieved on December 13, 1979. ! | 3 .~ Date When Fu11' Compliance Was Achieved Full compliance was achieved on December 13, 1979. ! | ||
:T; | :T; | ||
@ " W WN '*-- | @ " W WN '*-- | ||
e e, m- _ %_m,,}} | e e, m- _ %_m,,}} | ||
Revision as of 08:41, 1 February 2020
| ML19312D079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hartsville  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1980 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312D076 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003190768 | |
| Download: ML19312D079 (2) | |
Text
8 ;,..
TENNECCEE VAll..EY ' AUTHORITY
- CHATTANOOGA. .T5 NNESSEE 37jol. ... , .
400 Chestnut S tmt Tower'.II MJTA . n' '- ' -
February1i),F198F R 2 All : l5 t
Mr. ' James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II - Suite 3100- i 101 Marietta Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
l Enclosed is our final response to J. C. Bryant's January 29, 1980,.
letter, RII:NE 50-518/79-28, 50-519/79-28, 50-520/79-28, and 50-521/79-28, regarding activities at Hartsville Nuclear Plant which appeared to have been in violation of NRC regulations.
We. have reviewed the subject inspection repo*t and find no proprietary information in the report. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Jim Domer at FTS 854-2014.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DM.
. M. Mills, Man er Nuclear Regulati n and Safety Enclosure l
l l
l l
9
/
s003190 7f g An Equal Opportunity Employer OFFICIAL C#PY
7_.
4- .c t; ,
ENCLOSURE L _ -p.
FINAL' RESPONSE TO NRC-0IE LETTER FROM'C. E. MURPHY TO H. G. PARRIS
~
DATED JANU*1Y 29, 1980 >
(Reference RII:NE 50-518/79-28,.50-319/79-28, 50-520/79-28, 50-521,/79-28)
~
~
t This report responds to the Notice of Violation described in. Appendix A J of the'01E Inspection Report referenced above. This is;the final response on the subject noncompliance.
~
Noncompliance. Item - Infraction 518/79-28-01 As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and as. implemented by PSAR Section 17.la.5, " Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, . . . and shall be accomplished in
.accordance with those instructions, procedures, . . ." .TVA Procedure SOP-34, Revision 1, requires _that prior to the commencing of welding . . . th'e j welding inspector shall verify that.the proper preheat is being used . . . i and shall record this un the weld operation checklist.
Contrary to the above, on December 12, 1979, preheat inspection had been signed off for veld DVS00035 at a time when the welder was not ready to commence welding.
This is an infraction.
Response
- 1. Cor.ective' Steps Taken and Results Achieved' 1
I Ceneral observations and prior practices indicate that velders are ,
properly monitoring and providing preheat to weld joints by utilizing !
temperature indicating crayons. As a result, Hartsville_ quality j
- l contro1~ welding unit personnel believe that the weld in question is acceptable. !
- 2. Corrective Stps Taken-to Avoid Further Noncompliance
~
~
Both inspection and craft personne1 were reminded of preheat requirements.
- Additionally, inspection personnel were instructed to determine and ensure that the welder is prepared to commence welding before signing
, acceptance of preheat inspection.
~
3 .~ Date When Fu11' Compliance Was Achieved Full compliance was achieved on December 13, 1979. !
- T;
@ " W WN '*--
e e, m- _ %_m,,