Information Notice 2004-08, Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Leakage Attributable to Propagation of Cracking in Reactor Vessel Nozzle Welds: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
===NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION===
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION


OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, DC  20555-0001


WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 April 22, 2004 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-08:               REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY
===April 22, 2004===
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-08:


===REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY===
LEAKAGE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PROPAGATION
LEAKAGE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PROPAGATION


OF CRACKING IN REACTOR VESSEL NOZZLE
===OF CRACKING IN REACTOR VESSEL NOZZLE===
 
WELDS
WELDS


Line 42: Line 44:
addressees to cracking identified in the nozzle-to-cap weld of control rod drive (CRD) return line
addressees to cracking identified in the nozzle-to-cap weld of control rod drive (CRD) return line


penetration N10 at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim Station). The NRC expects
penetration N10 at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim Station). The NRC expects


recipients to review the information in this notice for applicability to their facilities and consider
recipients to review the information in this notice for applicability to their facilities and consider


actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this
actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this


information notice do not constitute NRC requirements and, therefore, do not require any
information notice do not constitute NRC requirements and, therefore, do not require any
Line 58: Line 60:
performing drywell inspections to identify and make necessary repairs to reduce drywell
performing drywell inspections to identify and make necessary repairs to reduce drywell


leakage. On October 1, 2003, the licensees drywell inspections revealed leakage from the
leakage. On October 1, 2003, the licensees drywell inspections revealed leakage from the


nozzle-to-cap weld area of penetration N10. The licensee concluded that the leakage was a
nozzle-to-cap weld area of penetration N10. The licensee concluded that the leakage was a


contributor to the unidentified drywell leakage.
contributor to the unidentified drywell leakage.
Line 72: Line 74:
Observations by the nondestructive examination (NDE) inspector suggested that the flaw
Observations by the nondestructive examination (NDE) inspector suggested that the flaw


initiated at the inner diameter (ID) of the weld, in the area of previous weld repairs. The
initiated at the inner diameter (ID) of the weld, in the area of previous weld repairs. The


through-wall location appeared to be close to the centerline of the weld.
through-wall location appeared to be close to the centerline of the weld.
Line 80: Line 82:
The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) nozzle is made of SA-508, Class 2 low-alloy steel, while the
The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) nozzle is made of SA-508, Class 2 low-alloy steel, while the


CRD return line cap is made of Alloy 600. The subject weld is fabricated with Alloy 82/182 material, and the nozzle side of the weld is buttered with Alloy 182 material.
CRD return line cap is made of Alloy 600. The subject weld is fabricated with Alloy 82/182 material, and the nozzle side of the weld is buttered with Alloy 182 material.


Section 2.2.1.2 of the BWR Vessel and Internals Project report BWRVIP-49, Instrument
Section 2.2.1.2 of the BWR Vessel and Internals Project report BWRVIP-49, Instrument
Line 86: Line 88:
Penetration Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, states that there has been extensive
Penetration Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, states that there has been extensive


laboratory and field experience with stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of nickel based alloy, including wrought Alloy 600, Alloy 82 and Alloy 182 weld metal. Both Alloy 600 and Alloy 182 are potentially susceptible to SCC under normal water chemistry conditions in the BWR
laboratory and field experience with stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of nickel based alloy, including wrought Alloy 600, Alloy 82 and Alloy 182 weld metal. Both Alloy 600 and Alloy 182 are potentially susceptible to SCC under normal water chemistry conditions in the BWR


environment. Alloy 600 is more resistant than Alloy 182 to crack initiation regardless of prior
environment. Alloy 600 is more resistant than Alloy 182 to crack initiation regardless of prior


fabrication history or metallurgical condition, particularly in the uncreviced condition. Consistent
fabrication history or metallurgical condition, particularly in the uncreviced condition. Consistent


with its higher chromium and lower carbon content, Alloy 82 weld metal is more resistant to
with its higher chromium and lower carbon content, Alloy 82 weld metal is more resistant to


SCC than Alloy 182. Stress corrosion cracking in the base material is referred to as
SCC than Alloy 182. Stress corrosion cracking in the base material is referred to as


intergranular SCC (IGSCC), while SCC in the weld material is referred to as interdendritic SCC
intergranular SCC (IGSCC), while SCC in the weld material is referred to as interdendritic SCC


(IDSCC) because of the nature of the elongated grains (or dendrites) in the weld. Both
(IDSCC) because of the nature of the elongated grains (or dendrites) in the weld. Both


degradation mechanisms refer to essentially the same phenomenon in the base metal and weld
degradation mechanisms refer to essentially the same phenomenon in the base metal and weld
Line 108: Line 110:
return line penetration N10 was IDSCC, given that the flaw was completely contained within the
return line penetration N10 was IDSCC, given that the flaw was completely contained within the


weld. The licensee asserted that the IDSCC was induced by a combination of a crevice
weld. The licensee asserted that the IDSCC was induced by a combination of a crevice


condition and weld repair stresses resulting from previous local weld repairs.
condition and weld repair stresses resulting from previous local weld repairs.


The licensee reviewed industry experience as part of its root cause evaluation. General Electric
The licensee reviewed industry experience as part of its root cause evaluation. General Electric


(GE) and utility personnel who comprised the root cause team for a 1997 event at Hope Creek
(GE) and utility personnel who comprised the root cause team for a 1997 event at Hope Creek
Line 118: Line 120:
concluded that the through-wall leak in the core spray nozzle to safe-end weld was attributable
concluded that the through-wall leak in the core spray nozzle to safe-end weld was attributable


to IDSCC in the Alloy 182 material. The root cause team also concluded that the crack growth
to IDSCC in the Alloy 182 material. The root cause team also concluded that the crack growth


rate was influenced by the presence of fabrication defects and weld repair stresses (i.e. the
rate was influenced by the presence of fabrication defects and weld repair stresses (i.e. the
Line 125: Line 127:


===Corrective Action===
===Corrective Action===
The Pilgrim Station licensee performed a weld overlay repair to stop the leakage. The
The Pilgrim Station licensee performed a weld overlay repair to stop the leakage. The


licensees repair technique is an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, IWA-4000, of the
licensees repair technique is an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, IWA-4000, of the
Line 131: Line 133:
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code promulgated by the American Society of Mechanical
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code promulgated by the American Society of Mechanical


Engineers (ASME). The repair was based on the use of Code Case N-504-2, Alternative
Engineers (ASME). The repair was based on the use of Code Case N-504-2, Alternative


Rules for Repair of Class 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping (with modifications), and
Rules for Repair of Class 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping (with modifications), and


Code Case N-638, "Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welding Using Ambient Temperature Machine
Code Case N-638, Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welding Using Ambient Temperature Machine
 
GTAW Temper Bead Technique.  (See ADAMS Accession No. ML032870328.)


GTAW Temper Bead Technique. (See ADAMS Accession No. ML032870328.)
===Background===
Background:
:
The N10 nozzle is a 10-cm (4-inch) diameter RPV penetration that was previously used to
The N10 nozzle is a 10-cm (4-inch) diameter RPV penetration that was previously used to


return CRD system flow to the reactor vessel. In 1977, the licensee modified the N10 nozzle to
return CRD system flow to the reactor vessel. In 1977, the licensee modified the N10 nozzle to


prevent cracking attributable to the cyclic thermal stresses resulting from the return of cooler
prevent cracking attributable to the cyclic thermal stresses resulting from the return of cooler


water to the reactor vessel from the CRD system. That modification consisted of cutting and
water to the reactor vessel from the CRD system. That modification consisted of cutting and


isolating the existing CRD system return line to nozzle N10 and rerouting the CRD return line to
isolating the existing CRD system return line to nozzle N10 and rerouting the CRD return line to


the CRD cooling water header. The modification also included removing the safe end and
the CRD cooling water header. The modification also included removing the safe end and


thermal sleeve from nozzle N10 and installing an Alloy 600 cap. The final configuration of the nozzle was composed of an Alloy 82/182 nozzle-to-cap butt weld from the forged steel nozzle
thermal sleeve from nozzle N10 and installing an Alloy 600 cap. The final configuration of the nozzle was composed of an Alloy 82/182 nozzle-to-cap butt weld from the forged steel nozzle


to the Alloy 600 cap. Radiographic examination following the modification identified defects in
to the Alloy 600 cap. Radiographic examination following the modification identified defects in


the weld, which the licensee subsequently repaired. The final testing of the modification was
the weld, which the licensee subsequently repaired. The final testing of the modification was


performed in 1977 using NDE and hydrostatic testing.
performed in 1977 using NDE and hydrostatic testing.
Line 165: Line 169:
During that same time period, GE recommended that BWR owners inspect nozzle-to-safe-end
During that same time period, GE recommended that BWR owners inspect nozzle-to-safe-end


welds containing Alloy 182 or a combination of Alloy 182 and Alloy 82 and, wherever practical, these inspections should be performed using automated UT scanning. Past inspections of
welds containing Alloy 182 or a combination of Alloy 182 and Alloy 82 and, wherever practical, these inspections should be performed using automated UT scanning. Past inspections of


dissimilar metal piping welds at Pilgrim Station were completed using the guidance in GL 88-01, which was superseded by guidance in BWRVIP-75, Technical Basis for Revisions to Generic
dissimilar metal piping welds at Pilgrim Station were completed using the guidance in GL 88-01, which was superseded by guidance in BWRVIP-75, Technical Basis for Revisions to Generic
Line 171: Line 175:
Letter 88-01 Inspection Schedules. (See ADAMS Accession Nos. ML003688842 and
Letter 88-01 Inspection Schedules. (See ADAMS Accession Nos. ML003688842 and


ML021350645.) In accordance with BWRVIP-75, the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld was classified as
ML021350645.) In accordance with BWRVIP-75, the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld was classified as


a Category D weld, meaning that it is made of susceptible materials that have not been treated
a Category D weld, meaning that it is made of susceptible materials that have not been treated


with an IGSCC remedy and in which cracks have not been reported. The N10 nozzle is located
with an IGSCC remedy and in which cracks have not been reported. The N10 nozzle is located


2.1m (84 inches) above the top of the active fuel and is not protected by hydrogen water
2.1m (84 inches) above the top of the active fuel and is not protected by hydrogen water


chemistry (HWC). (The purpose of HWC is to protect components from SCC.) Category D
chemistry (HWC). (The purpose of HWC is to protect components from SCC.) Category D


welds have a 6-year inspection frequency. Prior to the Fall 2003 inspection, the licensee
welds have a 6-year inspection frequency. Prior to the Fall 2003 inspection, the licensee


performed its last inspection of the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld during the Spring 1999 refueling
performed its last inspection of the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld during the Spring 1999 refueling


outage. As part of that inspection, Inservice Inspection/ Nondestructive Examination personnel
outage. As part of that inspection, Inservice Inspection/ Nondestructive Examination personnel


reviewed data sheets, but did not discover any recordable indications of SCC.
reviewed data sheets, but did not discover any recordable indications of SCC.
Line 192: Line 196:


systems include the following NRC information notices (INs):
systems include the following NRC information notices (INs):
IN 1990-30:   Ultrasonic Inspection Techniques for Dissimilar Metal Welds
IN 1990-30:
 
Ultrasonic Inspection Techniques for Dissimilar Metal Welds
IN 1992-50:    Cracking of Valves in the Condensate Return Lines of a BWR Emergency


Condenser System
IN 1992-50:
Cracking of Valves in the Condensate Return Lines of a BWR Emergency


IN 1998-44:   Ten-year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Update For Licensees That Intend
===Condenser System===
IN 1998-44:
Ten-year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Update For Licensees That Intend


to Implement Risk-Informed ISI of Piping
to Implement Risk-Informed ISI of Piping
Line 205: Line 211:
The licensees root cause for the cracking in nozzle N10 is consistent with the available
The licensees root cause for the cracking in nozzle N10 is consistent with the available


evidence and industry experience. The weld metal is susceptible to IDSCC, and there is
evidence and industry experience. The weld metal is susceptible to IDSCC, and there is


minimal protection (i.e., no HWC) from SCC mechanisms because of the location of the nozzle
minimal protection (i.e., no HWC) from SCC mechanisms because of the location of the nozzle
Line 213: Line 219:
In conducting the Spring 1999 inspection, the licensee used manual ultrasonic inspection
In conducting the Spring 1999 inspection, the licensee used manual ultrasonic inspection


techniques with qualified inspectors. The 2003 examinations were performed to the updated
techniques with qualified inspectors. The 2003 examinations were performed to the updated


requirements of Appendix VIII to Section XI of the ASME Code and the PDI program.
requirements of Appendix VIII to Section XI of the ASME Code and the PDI program.
Line 225: Line 231:
N10 weld, which is scheduled for the 2009 outage, the weld will be examined in accordance
N10 weld, which is scheduled for the 2009 outage, the weld will be examined in accordance


with the schedule for Category E welds in BWRVIP-75. BWRVIP-75 defines Category E welds
with the schedule for Category E welds in BWRVIP-75. BWRVIP-75 defines Category E welds


as those that have weld overlay repairs made with an IGSCC-resistant, nickel-based alloy (such
as those that have weld overlay repairs made with an IGSCC-resistant, nickel-based alloy (such


as Alloy 52) and have received one qualified ISI since the initial post-overlay examination. After
as Alloy 52) and have received one qualified ISI since the initial post-overlay examination. After


the initial examination, Category E welds with weld overlays are successively examined in
the initial examination, Category E welds with weld overlays are successively examined in
Line 235: Line 241:
accordance with BWRVIP-75, and related NRC comments, in order to ensure that there is no
accordance with BWRVIP-75, and related NRC comments, in order to ensure that there is no


new cracking or crack growth. The Category E welds are then examined at a rate of 25 percent
new cracking or crack growth. The Category E welds are then examined at a rate of 25 percent


of the population every 10 years for normal water chemistry.
of the population every 10 years for normal water chemistry.
Line 241: Line 247:
The staff and the licensee discussed expanding the scope of the Fall 2003 inspection to include
The staff and the licensee discussed expanding the scope of the Fall 2003 inspection to include


all other Category D welds. The licensee used the following factors to consider this expanded
all other Category D welds. The licensee used the following factors to consider this expanded


scope based on the attributes of the cracked N10 weld:
scope based on the attributes of the cracked N10 weld:
Line 259: Line 265:
the past (i.e., automated UT, rather than manual UT), had no weld repairs, and had no
the past (i.e., automated UT, rather than manual UT), had no weld repairs, and had no


radiographic defects. Therefore, the licensee did not expand the scope of the inspection.
radiographic defects. Therefore, the licensee did not expand the scope of the inspection.


The leakage from the penetration N10 nozzle-to-cap weld and other leak sources in the drywell
The leakage from the penetration N10 nozzle-to-cap weld and other leak sources in the drywell
Line 265: Line 271:
was less than the limit allowed by the plants technical specifications (TS) for unidentified
was less than the limit allowed by the plants technical specifications (TS) for unidentified


leakage and total leakage (combined unidentified and identified). The staff found that the
leakage and total leakage (combined unidentified and identified). The staff found that the


licensee had mitigating procedures, routine inspection activities, operable leakage detection
licensee had mitigating procedures, routine inspection activities, operable leakage detection
Line 271: Line 277:
equipment and TS requirements designed to detect low levels of leakage from the reactor
equipment and TS requirements designed to detect low levels of leakage from the reactor


coolant system (RCS) and minimize the potential that a flaw could remain undetected. On that
coolant system (RCS) and minimize the potential that a flaw could remain undetected. On that


basis, the staff determined, qualitatively, that the N10 pressure boundary leakage was of very
basis, the staff determined, qualitatively, that the N10 pressure boundary leakage was of very
Line 282: Line 288:
prior industry experience with IDSCC, the degradation that occurred at Pilgrim Station may be
prior industry experience with IDSCC, the degradation that occurred at Pilgrim Station may be


relevant to other BWR facilities. The licensee for Pilgrim Station used guidance from
relevant to other BWR facilities. The licensee for Pilgrim Station used guidance from


BWRVIP-75 to determine the appropriate inspection method and frequency for this weld. This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have
BWRVIP-75 to determine the appropriate inspection method and frequency for this weld. This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have


any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact identified
any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact identified
Line 293: Line 299:


/RA/
/RA/
                                            William D. Beckner, Chief


===William D. Beckner, Chief===
Reactors Operations Branch
Reactors Operations Branch


Division of Inspection Program Management
===Division of Inspection Program Management===
 
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Andrea D. Lee, NRR                    Jerry Dozier, NRR


(301) 415-2735                         (301) 415-1014 Email: adw1@nrc.gov                   Email: jxd@nrc.gov
===Andrea D. Lee, NRR===
Jerry Dozier, NRR
 
(301) 415-2735
(301) 415-1014 Email: adw1@nrc.gov
 
Email: jxd@nrc.gov
 
Attachment:  List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
 
ML041130396 OFFICE
 
OES:IROB:DIPM
 
Tech Editor
 
OCIO:IRSD:PSS
 
EMCB:DE
 
LPD4:DLPM
 
NAME
 
IJDozier JWF*
PKleene*
PAGarrity*
ADLee*
ABWang*
DATE
 
04/20/2004
03/01/2004
03/01/2004
03/03/2004
04/07/2004 OFFICE
 
BC:EMCB:DE
 
OES:IROB:DIPM
 
SC:OES:IROB:DIPM
 
C:IROB:DIPM
 
NAME


Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
WHBateman*
CDPetrone*
CJackson


ML041130396 OFFICE    OES:IROB:DIPM Tech Editor      OCIO:IRSD:PSS      EMCB:DE      LPD4:DLPM
WDBeckner


NAME      IJDozier JWF*  PKleene*        PAGarrity*          ADLee*      ABWang*
DATE
DATE     04/20/2004      03/01/2004      03/01/2004          03/03/2004  04/07/2004 OFFICE    BC:EMCB:DE      OES:IROB:DIPM SC:OES:IROB:DIPM      C:IROB:DIPM


NAME     WHBateman*      CDPetrone*      CJackson            WDBeckner
04/15/2004
04/15/2004
04/22/2004
04/22/2004
     /      /


DATE      04/15/2004      04/15/2004      04/22/2004          04/22/2004      /  /
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License


Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
CP = Construction Permit


===Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED===
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Information                                             Date of
Information
 
Date of
 
Notice No.
 
Subject
 
Issuance


Notice No.              Subject                        Issuance          Issued to
Issued to


_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2004-07           Plugging of Safety Injection         04/07/2004       All holders of operating licenses
2004-07
 
===Plugging of Safety Injection===
Pump Lubrication Oil Coolers
 
with Lakeweed
 
04/07/2004


Pump Lubrication Oil Coolers                          or construction permits for
===All holders of operating licenses===
or construction permits for


with Lakeweed                                          nuclear power reactors, except
nuclear power reactors, except


those who have permanently
those who have permanently
Line 343: Line 415:
reactor vessel.
reactor vessel.


2004-06           Loss of Feedwater Isokinetic        03/26/2004        All holders of operating licensees
2004-06


Sampling Probes at Dresden                             for nuclear power reactors except
===Loss of Feedwater Isokinetic===
Sampling Probes at Dresden


Units 2 and 3                                         those who have permanently
===Units 2 and 3===
03/26/2004
 
===All holders of operating licensees===
for nuclear power reactors except
 
those who have permanently


ceased operations and have
ceased operations and have
Line 357: Line 436:
reactor vessel.
reactor vessel.


2004-05           Spent Fuel Pool Leakage to           03/03/2004       All holders of operating licensees
2004-05
 
===Spent Fuel Pool Leakage to===
Onsite Groundwater
 
03/03/2004


Onsite Groundwater                                    for nuclear power reactors (except
===All holders of operating licensees===
for nuclear power reactors (except


those who have permanently
those who have permanently
Line 377: Line 462:
construction permits.
construction permits.


2004-04           Fuel Damage During Cleaning         02/24/2004        All holders of operating licenses
2004-04
 
===Fuel Damage During Cleaning===
at a Foreign Pressurized Water


at a Foreign Pressurized Water                        for light-water reactors, except
Reactor


Reactor                                                those who have permanently
02/24/2004
 
===All holders of operating licenses===
for light-water reactors, except
 
those who have permanently


ceased operations and have
ceased operations and have
Line 391: Line 484:
reactor.
reactor.


Note:           NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are
Note:
NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are


issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:
                To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following
To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following


command in the message portion:
command in the message portion:
                                  subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname
subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname}}
 
______________________________________________________________________________________
OL = Operating License
 
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 03:26, 16 January 2025

Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Leakage Attributable to Propagation of Cracking in Reactor Vessel Nozzle Welds
ML041130396
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/22/2004
From: Beckner W
NRC/NRR/DIPM/IROB
To:
Dozier J, NRR/IROB 415-1014
References
IN-04-008
Download: ML041130396 (7)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001

April 22, 2004

NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2004-08:

REACTOR COOLANT PRESSURE BOUNDARY

LEAKAGE ATTRIBUTABLE TO PROPAGATION

OF CRACKING IN REACTOR VESSEL NOZZLE

WELDS

Addressees

All holders of operating licensees for nuclear power boiling-water reactors (BWRs), except

those who have permanently ceased operations and have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

Purpose

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert

addressees to cracking identified in the nozzle-to-cap weld of control rod drive (CRD) return line

penetration N10 at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim Station). The NRC expects

recipients to review the information in this notice for applicability to their facilities and consider

actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this

information notice do not constitute NRC requirements and, therefore, do not require any

specific action or written response.

Description of Circumstances

During a planned outage on September 30, 2003, the licensee for Pilgrim Station began

performing drywell inspections to identify and make necessary repairs to reduce drywell

leakage. On October 1, 2003, the licensees drywell inspections revealed leakage from the

nozzle-to-cap weld area of penetration N10. The licensee concluded that the leakage was a

contributor to the unidentified drywell leakage.

The licensee used a Performance Demonstration Initiative (PDI) qualified manual ultrasonic

testing (UT) technique to determine that the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld contained an unacceptable

flaw that was approximately 4.45cm (1.75 inches) long in the circumferential direction.

Observations by the nondestructive examination (NDE) inspector suggested that the flaw

initiated at the inner diameter (ID) of the weld, in the area of previous weld repairs. The

through-wall location appeared to be close to the centerline of the weld.

Root Cause

The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) nozzle is made of SA-508, Class 2 low-alloy steel, while the

CRD return line cap is made of Alloy 600. The subject weld is fabricated with Alloy 82/182 material, and the nozzle side of the weld is buttered with Alloy 182 material.

Section 2.2.1.2 of the BWR Vessel and Internals Project report BWRVIP-49, Instrument

Penetration Inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines, states that there has been extensive

laboratory and field experience with stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of nickel based alloy, including wrought Alloy 600, Alloy 82 and Alloy 182 weld metal. Both Alloy 600 and Alloy 182 are potentially susceptible to SCC under normal water chemistry conditions in the BWR

environment. Alloy 600 is more resistant than Alloy 182 to crack initiation regardless of prior

fabrication history or metallurgical condition, particularly in the uncreviced condition. Consistent

with its higher chromium and lower carbon content, Alloy 82 weld metal is more resistant to

SCC than Alloy 182. Stress corrosion cracking in the base material is referred to as

intergranular SCC (IGSCC), while SCC in the weld material is referred to as interdendritic SCC

(IDSCC) because of the nature of the elongated grains (or dendrites) in the weld. Both

degradation mechanisms refer to essentially the same phenomenon in the base metal and weld

metal.

The licensee concluded that the root cause of the cracking in the nozzle-to-cap weld of CRD

return line penetration N10 was IDSCC, given that the flaw was completely contained within the

weld. The licensee asserted that the IDSCC was induced by a combination of a crevice

condition and weld repair stresses resulting from previous local weld repairs.

The licensee reviewed industry experience as part of its root cause evaluation. General Electric

(GE) and utility personnel who comprised the root cause team for a 1997 event at Hope Creek

concluded that the through-wall leak in the core spray nozzle to safe-end weld was attributable

to IDSCC in the Alloy 182 material. The root cause team also concluded that the crack growth

rate was influenced by the presence of fabrication defects and weld repair stresses (i.e. the

leak was in the area of a previous local repair using Alloy 182).

Corrective Action

The Pilgrim Station licensee performed a weld overlay repair to stop the leakage. The

licensees repair technique is an alternative to the requirements in Section XI, IWA-4000, of the

Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code promulgated by the American Society of Mechanical

Engineers (ASME). The repair was based on the use of Code Case N-504-2, Alternative

Rules for Repair of Class 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping (with modifications), and

Code Case N-638, Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welding Using Ambient Temperature Machine

GTAW Temper Bead Technique. (See ADAMS Accession No. ML032870328.)

Background

The N10 nozzle is a 10-cm (4-inch) diameter RPV penetration that was previously used to

return CRD system flow to the reactor vessel. In 1977, the licensee modified the N10 nozzle to

prevent cracking attributable to the cyclic thermal stresses resulting from the return of cooler

water to the reactor vessel from the CRD system. That modification consisted of cutting and

isolating the existing CRD system return line to nozzle N10 and rerouting the CRD return line to

the CRD cooling water header. The modification also included removing the safe end and

thermal sleeve from nozzle N10 and installing an Alloy 600 cap. The final configuration of the nozzle was composed of an Alloy 82/182 nozzle-to-cap butt weld from the forged steel nozzle

to the Alloy 600 cap. Radiographic examination following the modification identified defects in

the weld, which the licensee subsequently repaired. The final testing of the modification was

performed in 1977 using NDE and hydrostatic testing.

The NRC subsequently issued Generic Letter (GL) 88-01, NRC Position on IGSCC in BWR

Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping, to address the subject of IGSCC cracking in BWR piping.

During that same time period, GE recommended that BWR owners inspect nozzle-to-safe-end

welds containing Alloy 182 or a combination of Alloy 182 and Alloy 82 and, wherever practical, these inspections should be performed using automated UT scanning. Past inspections of

dissimilar metal piping welds at Pilgrim Station were completed using the guidance in GL 88-01, which was superseded by guidance in BWRVIP-75, Technical Basis for Revisions to Generic

Letter 88-01 Inspection Schedules. (See ADAMS Accession Nos. ML003688842 and

ML021350645.) In accordance with BWRVIP-75, the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld was classified as

a Category D weld, meaning that it is made of susceptible materials that have not been treated

with an IGSCC remedy and in which cracks have not been reported. The N10 nozzle is located

2.1m (84 inches) above the top of the active fuel and is not protected by hydrogen water

chemistry (HWC). (The purpose of HWC is to protect components from SCC.) Category D

welds have a 6-year inspection frequency. Prior to the Fall 2003 inspection, the licensee

performed its last inspection of the N10 nozzle-to-cap weld during the Spring 1999 refueling

outage. As part of that inspection, Inservice Inspection/ Nondestructive Examination personnel

reviewed data sheets, but did not discover any recordable indications of SCC.

Other related generic communications involving weld inspections and degradation in BWR

systems include the following NRC information notices (INs):

IN 1990-30:

Ultrasonic Inspection Techniques for Dissimilar Metal Welds

IN 1992-50:

Cracking of Valves in the Condensate Return Lines of a BWR Emergency

Condenser System

IN 1998-44:

Ten-year Inservice Inspection (ISI) Program Update For Licensees That Intend

to Implement Risk-Informed ISI of Piping

Discussion:

The licensees root cause for the cracking in nozzle N10 is consistent with the available

evidence and industry experience. The weld metal is susceptible to IDSCC, and there is

minimal protection (i.e., no HWC) from SCC mechanisms because of the location of the nozzle

cap and stagnant flow conditions.

In conducting the Spring 1999 inspection, the licensee used manual ultrasonic inspection

techniques with qualified inspectors. The 2003 examinations were performed to the updated

requirements of Appendix VIII to Section XI of the ASME Code and the PDI program.

Enhanced ultrasonic examinations using PDI-qualified inspectors have improved the capability

to detect flaws related to SCC mechanisms, including those that occur entirely within the weld

metal. With respect to future inspections of this weld, after the qualified ISI examination of the nozzle

N10 weld, which is scheduled for the 2009 outage, the weld will be examined in accordance

with the schedule for Category E welds in BWRVIP-75. BWRVIP-75 defines Category E welds

as those that have weld overlay repairs made with an IGSCC-resistant, nickel-based alloy (such

as Alloy 52) and have received one qualified ISI since the initial post-overlay examination. After

the initial examination, Category E welds with weld overlays are successively examined in

accordance with BWRVIP-75, and related NRC comments, in order to ensure that there is no

new cracking or crack growth. The Category E welds are then examined at a rate of 25 percent

of the population every 10 years for normal water chemistry.

The staff and the licensee discussed expanding the scope of the Fall 2003 inspection to include

all other Category D welds. The licensee used the following factors to consider this expanded

scope based on the attributes of the cracked N10 weld:

- weld at a reactor vessel nozzle

- Category D weld

- low HWC protection

- dissimilar metal weld (Alloy 82/182)

- significant weld repair during original installation

- ID grinding and/or radiographic defects

The other Category D welds were, for example, protected by HWC, had improved inspections in

the past (i.e., automated UT, rather than manual UT), had no weld repairs, and had no

radiographic defects. Therefore, the licensee did not expand the scope of the inspection.

The leakage from the penetration N10 nozzle-to-cap weld and other leak sources in the drywell

was less than the limit allowed by the plants technical specifications (TS) for unidentified

leakage and total leakage (combined unidentified and identified). The staff found that the

licensee had mitigating procedures, routine inspection activities, operable leakage detection

equipment and TS requirements designed to detect low levels of leakage from the reactor

coolant system (RCS) and minimize the potential that a flaw could remain undetected. On that

basis, the staff determined, qualitatively, that the N10 pressure boundary leakage was of very

low safety significance.

Generic Implications:

Based on the information currently available, such as other capped BWR CRD return lines and

prior industry experience with IDSCC, the degradation that occurred at Pilgrim Station may be

relevant to other BWR facilities. The licensee for Pilgrim Station used guidance from

BWRVIP-75 to determine the appropriate inspection method and frequency for this weld. This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. If you have

any questions about the information in this notice, please contact the technical contact identified

below or the appropriate project manager in the NRCs Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

(NRR).

/RA/

William D. Beckner, Chief

Reactors Operations Branch

Division of Inspection Program Management

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Andrea D. Lee, NRR

Jerry Dozier, NRR

(301) 415-2735

(301) 415-1014 Email: adw1@nrc.gov

Email: jxd@nrc.gov

Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices

ML041130396 OFFICE

OES:IROB:DIPM

Tech Editor

OCIO:IRSD:PSS

EMCB:DE

LPD4:DLPM

NAME

IJDozier JWF*

PKleene*

PAGarrity*

ADLee*

ABWang*

DATE

04/20/2004

03/01/2004

03/01/2004

03/03/2004

04/07/2004 OFFICE

BC:EMCB:DE

OES:IROB:DIPM

SC:OES:IROB:DIPM

C:IROB:DIPM

NAME

WHBateman*

CDPetrone*

CJackson

WDBeckner

DATE

04/15/2004

04/15/2004

04/22/2004

04/22/2004

/ /

______________________________________________________________________________________

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit

Attachment LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

NRC INFORMATION NOTICES

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issuance

Issued to

_____________________________________________________________________________________

2004-07

Plugging of Safety Injection

Pump Lubrication Oil Coolers

with Lakeweed

04/07/2004

All holders of operating licenses

or construction permits for

nuclear power reactors, except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2004-06

Loss of Feedwater Isokinetic

Sampling Probes at Dresden

Units 2 and 3

03/26/2004

All holders of operating licensees

for nuclear power reactors except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel.

2004-05

Spent Fuel Pool Leakage to

Onsite Groundwater

03/03/2004

All holders of operating licensees

for nuclear power reactors (except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor vessel) and for research

and test reactors, and all holders

of fuel storage licenses and

construction permits.

2004-04

Fuel Damage During Cleaning

at a Foreign Pressurized Water

Reactor

02/24/2004

All holders of operating licenses

for light-water reactors, except

those who have permanently

ceased operations and have

certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the

reactor.

Note:

NRC generic communications may be received in electronic format shortly after they are

issued by subscribing to the NRC listserver as follows:

To subscribe send an e-mail to <listproc@nrc.gov >, no subject, and the following

command in the message portion:

subscribe gc-nrr firstname lastname