ML082381091: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES  
                                      NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION  
                                                      REGION II
REGION II  
                                        SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
                                        61 FORSYTH STREET, SW, SUITE 23T85
61 FORSYTH STREET, SW, SUITE 23T85  
                                            ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8931
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8931  
                                          August 25, 2008
Mr. David A. Christian
 
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
August 25, 2008  
Virginia Electric and Power Company
Innsbrook Technical Center
Mr. David A. Christian  
5000 Dominion Boulevard
President and Chief Nuclear Officer  
Glen Allen, VA 23060
Virginia Electric and Power Company  
SUBJECT:       NORTH ANNA POWER STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION
Innsbrook Technical Center  
                REPORT 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, AND 07200056/2008003
5000 Dominion Boulevard  
Dear Mr. Christian:
Glen Allen, VA 23060  
On June 30, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at
your North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection report
SUBJECT:  
documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008 with
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION
Mr. Daniel Stoddard, and on August 22, 2008 with other members of your staff.
REPORT 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, AND 07200056/2008003  
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they related to safety and
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your
Dear Mr. Christian:  
licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and
interviewed personnel.
On June 30, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at  
Based on the results of this inspection, one self-revealing finding of very low safety significance
your North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection report  
(Green) was identified which involved a violation of NRC requirements. Additionally, one
documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008 with  
licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety significance is listed
Mr. Daniel Stoddard, and on August 22, 2008 with other members of your staff.  
in this report. NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with
Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they related to safety and  
violations and because they were entered into your corrective action program. If you contest
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your  
these non-cited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this
licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and  
inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.:
interviewed personnel.  
Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional
Administrator, Region II, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory
Based on the results of this inspection, one self-revealing finding of very low safety significance  
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the North Anna
(Green) was identified which involved a violation of NRC requirements. Additionally, one  
Power Station.
licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety significance is listed  
in this report. NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with  
Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the  
violations and because they were entered into your corrective action program. If you contest  
these non-cited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this  
inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.:  
Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional  
Administrator, Region II, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory  
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the North Anna  
Power Station.  


VEPCO                                           2
VEPCO  
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its
 
enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the
2
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its  
NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at
enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the  
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the  
                                              Sincerely,
NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at  
                                              /RA/
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).  
                                              Mark A. Bates, Acting Chief
                                              Reactor Projects Branch 5
                                              Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos. 50-338, 50-339
License Nos. NPF-4, NPF-7
Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, and 07200056/2008003
              w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl. (See next page)
Sincerely,  
/RA/  
Mark A. Bates, Acting Chief  
Reactor Projects Branch 5  
Division of Reactor Projects  
Docket Nos. 50-338, 50-339  
License Nos. NPF-4, NPF-7  
Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, and 07200056/2008003  
w/Attachment: Supplemental Information  
cc w/encl. (See next page)




  ___________________
  ___________________
  OFFICE       RII:DRP           RII:DRP         RII:DRS         RII:DRS       RII:DRS           RII:DRS         RII:DRS
   
  SIGNATURE     Non Concur         Non -Concur     /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/
OFFICE  
  NAME         JReece             RClagg         RMoore         CPeabody       CEven             GGardner       KMiller
RII:DRP  
  DATE               8/25/08           8/25/08         7/28/08         7/28/08       7/22/08           7/28/08     7/28/087/28/08
RII:DRP  
  E-MAIL COPY?    YES       NO   YES         NO YES     NO     YES    NO     YES     NO      YES      NO     YES     NO
RII:DRS  
  OFFICE       RII:DRS           RII:DRP         RII:DRP
RII:DRS  
  SIGNATURE     /RA/               /RA/           /RA/
RII:DRS  
  NAME         JHelm             JDodson         JMoorman
RII:DRS  
  DATE                                 8/25/08         8/25/08
RII:DRS
  E-MAIL COPY?    YES       NO   YES         NO YES         NO YES         NO YES           NO YES           NO YES         NO
SIGNATURE  
       
Non Concur  
VEPCO                                    3
Non -Concur  
cc w/encl:
/RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/  
Chris L. Funderburk                        Eugene S. Grecheck
NAME  
Director                                  Vice President - Nuclear Development
JReece  
Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support  Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
RClagg  
Virginia Electric and Power Company        Electronic Mail Distribution
RMoore  
Electronic Mail Distribution
CPeabody  
                                          Leslie N. Hartz
CEven  
D. G. Stoddard                            Vice President - Nuclear Support Services
GGardner  
Site Vice President                        Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
KMiller  
North Anna Power Station                  5000 Dominion Boulevard
DATE  
Electronic Mail Distribution              Glen Allen, VA 23061
8/25/08  
Executive Vice President                  Eric Hendrixson
8/25/08  
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative          Director - Nuclear Safety and Licensing
7/28/08  
Electronic Mail Distribution              Virginia Electric & Power Company
7/28/08  
                                          Electronic Mail Distribution
7/22/08  
County Administrator
7/28/08  
Louisa County                              Michael M. Cline
7/28/087/28/08
P.O. Box 160                              Director
E-MAIL COPY?    YES  
Louisa, VA 23093                          Virginia Department of Emergency
NO     YES           NO   YES     NO  
                                          Services Management
  YES    NO  
Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.                    Electronic Mail Distribution
  YES       NO  
Senior Counsel
  YES       NO  
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
  YES       NO  
Millstone Power Station
Electronic Mail Distribution
OFFICE  
Attorney General
RII:DRS  
Supreme Court Building
RII:DRP  
900 East Main Street
RII:DRP  
Richmond, VA 23219
Senior Resident Inspector
Virginia Electric and Power Company
North Anna Power Station
U.S. NRC
SIGNATURE  
P.O. Box 490
/RA/  
Mineral, VA 23117
/RA/  
/RA/  
NAME  
JHelm  
JDodson  
JMoorman  
DATE  
8/25/08  
8/25/08  
E-MAIL COPY?    YES  
NO     YES  
NO YES  
NO YES  
NO YES  
NO YES  
NO YES  
NO


VEPCO                                       4
VEPCO  
Report to D. A. Christian from M. A. Bates dated August 25, 2008.
 
Distribution w/encl:
3
C. Evans, RII EICS (Part 72 Only)
cc w/encl:
L. Slack, RII EICS
Chris L. Funderburk
OE Mail (email address if applicable)
Director
RIDSNRRDIRS
Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support
PUBLIC
Virginia Electric and Power Company
S. P. Lingam, NRR (PM: NA, SUR)
Electronic Mail Distribution
Richard Jervey, NRR
D. G. Stoddard
Site Vice President
North Anna Power Station
Electronic Mail Distribution
Executive Vice President
Old Dominion Electric Cooperative
Electronic Mail Distribution
County Administrator
Louisa County
P.O. Box 160
Louisa, VA  23093
Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.  
Senior Counsel
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.  
Millstone Power Station
Electronic Mail Distribution  
Attorney General
Supreme Court Building
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA  23219
Senior Resident Inspector
Virginia Electric and Power Company
North Anna Power Station
U.S. NRC
P.O. Box 490
Mineral, VA  23117
Eugene S. Grecheck
Vice President - Nuclear Development
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Electronic Mail Distribution
Leslie N. Hartz
Vice President - Nuclear Support Services
Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA  23061
Eric Hendrixson
Director - Nuclear Safety and Licensing
Virginia Electric & Power Company
Electronic Mail Distribution
Michael M. Cline
Director
Virginia Department of Emergency
Services Management
Electronic Mail Distribution


              U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
VEPCO
                                  REGION II
4
Docket Nos: 50-338, 50-339, 72-056
   
License Nos: NPF-4, NPF-7
Report to D. A. Christian from M. A. Bates dated August 25, 2008.
Report No:  05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, 07200056/2008003
Licensee:    Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO)
Distribution w/encl:  
Facility:    North Anna Power Station, Units 1 & 2
C. Evans, RII EICS (Part 72 Only)
Location:    1022 Haley Drive
L. Slack, RII EICS
            Mineral, Virginia 23117
OE Mail (email address if applicable)
Dates:      April 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008
RIDSNRRDIRS
Inspectors: J. Reece, Senior Resident Inspector
PUBLIC
            R. Clagg, Resident Inspector
S. P. Lingam, NRR (PM:  NA, SUR)
            R. Moore, Senior Reactor Inspector, Section 4OA5.1
Richard Jervey, NRR
            C. Peabody, Reactor Inspection, Section 1R17
            C. Even, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
            G. Gardner, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
            K. Miller, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
            J. Helm, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
Approved by: M. A. Bates, Acting Chief
            Reactor Projects Branch 5
            Division of Reactor Projects
                                                                  Enclosure


                                        CONTENTS
Summary of Plant Status...4
Enclosure
REACTOR SAFETY.......4
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
1R01        Adverse Weather Protection..4
1R04        Equipment Alignment..4
REGION II
1R05        Fire Protection..5
1R11        Licensed Operator Requalification Program...6
1R12        Maintenance Effectiveness6
1R13        Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control....8
Docket Nos:
1R15        Operability Evaluations...9
1R17        Evaluations of Changes, Test, or Experiments and Permanent Plant
50-338, 50-339, 72-056
            Modifications 9
1R19        Post-Maintenance Testing.. 12
1R22        Surveillance Testing 13
License Nos: 
OTHER ACTIVITIES......13
NPF-4, NPF-7
4OA1        Performance Indicator Verification ... 13
4OA2        Identification and Resolution of Problems .. 14
4OA3        Event Followup.17
Report No:
4OA5        Other Activities 18
4OA6        Meetings, Including Exit..20
05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, 07200056/2008003
4OA7        Licensee-Identified Violations.. 20
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Key Points of Contact.....A-1
Licensee:
List of Items Opened, Closed, and Discussed...A-1
List of Documents Reviewed.A-3
Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO)
Facility:
North Anna Power Station, Units 1 & 2
Location:
1022 Haley Drive
Mineral, Virginia 23117
Dates: 
April 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008
Inspectors:
J. Reece, Senior Resident Inspector
R. Clagg, Resident Inspector
R. Moore, Senior Reactor Inspector, Section 4OA5.1
C. Peabody, Reactor Inspection, Section 1R17
C. Even, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
G. Gardner, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
K. Miller, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
J. Helm, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17
Approved by: 
M. A. Bates, Acting Chief
Reactor Projects Branch 5
Division of Reactor Projects


                                      SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000338/2008-003, 05000339/2008-003; 04/01/2008 - 06/30/2008; North Anna Power
Station, Units 1 and 2. Routine Integrated Resident and Regional Report.
CONTENTS
The report covered a three month period of inspection by resident inspectors and reactor
inspectors from the region. One Green finding, which was a non-cited violation (NCV), was
Identified, and one licensee identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety
Summary of Plant Status...4
significance are listed in this report. The significance of most findings is identified by their color
(Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance
REACTOR SAFETY.......4
Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or
1R01
be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for
Adverse Weather Protection..4
1R04
Equipment Alignment..4
1R05
Fire Protection..5
1R11
Licensed Operator Requalification Program...6
1R12
Maintenance Effectiveness6
1R13
Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control....8
1R15
Operability Evaluations...9
1R17
Evaluations of Changes, Test, or Experiments and Permanent Plant
Modifications 9
1R19
Post-Maintenance Testing..  12
1R22
Surveillance Testing  13
OTHER ACTIVITIES......13
4OA1
Performance Indicator Verification  ... 13
4OA2
Identification and Resolution of Problems  ..  14
4OA3
Event Followup.17
4OA5
Other Activities    18
4OA6
Meetings, Including Exit..20
4OA7
Licensee-Identified Violations..  20
ATTACHMENT:  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Key Points of Contact.....A-1
List of Items Opened, Closed, and Discussed...A-1
List of Documents Reviewed.A-3
 
 
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS  
IR 05000338/2008-003, 05000339/2008-003; 04/01/2008 - 06/30/2008; North Anna Power  
Station, Units 1 and 2. Routine Integrated Resident and Regional Report.  
The report covered a three month period of inspection by resident inspectors and reactor  
inspectors from the region. One Green finding, which was a non-cited violation (NCV), was
Identified, and one licensee identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety  
significance are listed in this report. The significance of most findings is identified by their color  
(Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance  
Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or  
be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for  
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-
1649, Reactor Oversight Process Revision 4, dated December, 2006.
1649, Reactor Oversight Process Revision 4, dated December, 2006.  
A.       NRC Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
        Green. A Green self-revealing non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS)
A.  
        5.4.1.a was identified for failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for
NRC Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
        repair of the Unit 1 1H emergency diesel generator (EDG) air start check valves. The
        licensee entered this problem into their corrective action program as condition report
Green. A Green self-revealing non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS)  
        098146, revised the procedure, and successfully completed repairs to the '1H' EDG.
5.4.1.a was identified for failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for  
        The finding was more than minor because it directly impacted the mitigating systems
repair of the Unit 1 1H emergency diesel generator (EDG) air start check valves. The  
        cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems
licensee entered this problem into their corrective action program as condition report  
        that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related
098146, revised the procedure, and successfully completed repairs to the '1H' EDG.  
        attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check
        valves were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC
The finding was more than minor because it directly impacted the mitigating systems  
        0609, Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance
cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems  
        (Green) because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification
that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related  
        deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train
attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check  
        being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant
valves were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC  
        due to possible external events. (Section 1R12)
0609, Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance  
B.       Licensee-Identified Violations.
(Green) because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification  
        Violations of very low safety significance, which were identified by the licensee have
deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train  
        been reviewed by the inspectors. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee
being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant  
        have been entered into the licensees corrective action program. These violations and
due to possible external events. (Section 1R12)  
        corrective actions are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
B.  
Licensee-Identified Violations.  
Violations of very low safety significance, which were identified by the licensee have  
been reviewed by the inspectors. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee  
have been entered into the licensees corrective action program. These violations and  
corrective actions are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.  


                                        REPORT DETAILS
Summary of Plant Status
Unit 1 and 2 began the period at full Rated Thermal Power (RTP) and operated at or near full
REPORT DETAILS  
RTP for the entire report period.
1.     REACTOR SAFETY
        Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity
Summary of Plant Status  
1R01 Adverse Weather Protection
  a.     Inspection Scope
Unit 1 and 2 began the period at full Rated Thermal Power (RTP) and operated at or near full  
        The inspectors reviewed the licensees adverse weather preparations for hot weather
RTP for the entire report period.  
        operations, specified in 0-GOP-4.1, Rev 23, 07/10/08, Hot Weather Operations, and
        the licensees correction action data base for hot weather related issues. The
1.  
        inspectors walked down the two risk-significant areas listed below to verify compliance
REACTOR SAFETY  
        with the procedural requirements and to verify that the specified actions provided the
        necessary protection for the structures, systems, or components.
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity  
        *       Unit 1 & 2 auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump rooms;
        *       Unit 1 & 2 quench spray (QS) pump rooms; and
1R01 Adverse Weather Protection  
        *       Unit 1 outside recirculation spray (RS) and low head safety injection (LHSI)
   
                pump room.
a.  
   b.   Findings
Inspection Scope  
        No findings of significance were identified.
1R04 Equipment Alignment
The inspectors reviewed the licensees adverse weather preparations for hot weather
.1     Partial Walkdown
operations, specified in 0-GOP-4.1, Rev 23, 07/10/08, Hot Weather Operations, and  
   a.   Inspection Scope
the licensees correction action data base for hot weather related issues. The  
        The inspectors conducted four equipment partial alignment walkdowns to evaluate the
inspectors walked down the two risk-significant areas listed below to verify compliance  
        operability of selected redundant trains or backup systems, listed below, with the other
with the procedural requirements and to verify that the specified actions provided the  
        train or system inoperable or out of service. The inspectors reviewed the functional
necessary protection for the structures, systems, or components.  
        systems descriptions, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), system
        operating procedures, and Technical Specifications (TS) to determine correct system
*  
        lineups for the current plant conditions. The inspectors performed walkdowns of the
Unit 1 & 2 auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump rooms;  
        systems to verify that critical components were properly aligned and to identify any
*  
        discrepancies which could affect operability of the redundant train or backup system.
Unit 1 & 2 quench spray (QS) pump rooms; and  
*  
Unit 1 outside recirculation spray (RS) and low head safety injection (LHSI)  
pump room.  
   b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  
1R04 Equipment Alignment  
.1  
Partial Walkdown  
   a.  
Inspection Scope  
The inspectors conducted four equipment partial alignment walkdowns to evaluate the  
operability of selected redundant trains or backup systems, listed below, with the other  
train or system inoperable or out of service. The inspectors reviewed the functional  
systems descriptions, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), system  
operating procedures, and Technical Specifications (TS) to determine correct system  
lineups for the current plant conditions. The inspectors performed walkdowns of the  
systems to verify that critical components were properly aligned and to identify any  
discrepancies which could affect operability of the redundant train or backup system.


                                              5
5  
    *       Unit 2 '2J' Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) and support systems during
            planned maintenance on '2H' EDG;
    *       Unit 1 '1H' EDG during planned maintenance on '1J' EDG;
*  
    *       Unit 1 '1J' EDG and support systems during planned maintenance on '1H' EDG;
Unit 2 '2J' Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) and support systems during  
            and,
planned maintenance on '2H' EDG;  
    *       Unit 1 'B' LHSI pump during planned maintenance on 'A' LHSI pump and related
*  
            valves.
Unit 1 '1H' EDG during planned maintenance on '1J' EDG;  
  b.  Findings
*  
    No findings of significance were identified.
Unit 1 '1J' EDG and support systems during planned maintenance on '1H' EDG;  
.2   Complete Walkdown
and,  
   a. Inspection Scope
*  
    The inspectors performed a detailed walkdown and inspection of the Unit 1 'A' Train
Unit 1 'B' LHSI pump during planned maintenance on 'A' LHSI pump and related  
    outside RS system components external to containment to assess proper alignment and
valves.  
    to identify discrepancies that could impact its availability and functional capacity. The
   
    inspectors assessed the physical condition and position of each recirculation spray and
b.  
    casing cooling valve, whether manual, power operated or automatic to ensure correct
Findings
    positioning of the valves. The inspection also included a review of the alignment and the
    condition of support systems including fire protection, room ventilation, and emergency
   
    lighting. Equipment deficiency tags were reviewed and the condition of the system was
No findings of significance were identified.  
    discussed with the engineering personnel.
   b. Findings
.2  
    No findings of significance were identified.
Complete Walkdown  
1R05 Fire Protection
   a. Inspection Scope
   a.  
    The inspectors conducted tours of the eight areas listed below that are important to
Inspection Scope  
    reactor safety to verify the licensees implementation of fire protection requirements as
    described in Virginia Power Administrative Procedure VPAP-2401, Rev 28, 12/14/07,
The inspectors performed a detailed walkdown and inspection of the Unit 1 'A' Train  
    Fire Protection Program. The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, conditions related
outside RS system components external to containment to assess proper alignment and  
    to: (1) licensee control of transient combustibles and ignition sources; (2) the material
to identify discrepancies that could impact its availability and functional capacity. The  
    condition, operational status, and operational lineup of fire protection systems,
inspectors assessed the physical condition and position of each recirculation spray and  
    equipment, and features; and (3) the fire barriers used to prevent fire damage or fire
casing cooling valve, whether manual, power operated or automatic to ensure correct  
    propagation.
positioning of the valves. The inspection also included a review of the alignment and the  
    *       Emergency Diesel Generator 2H Unit 2 (fire zone 9A-2a / EDG-2H);
condition of support systems including fire protection, room ventilation, and emergency  
    *       Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 1 (fire zone 6-1a / ESR-1);
lighting. Equipment deficiency tags were reviewed and the condition of the system was  
    *       Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 2 (fire zone 6-2a / ESR-2);
discussed with the engineering personnel.  
    *       Emergency Diesel Generator 2J Unit 2 (fire zone 9B-2a / EDG-2J);
   b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  
1R05 Fire Protection  
   a.  
Inspection Scope  
The inspectors conducted tours of the eight areas listed below that are important to  
reactor safety to verify the licensees implementation of fire protection requirements as  
described in Virginia Power Administrative Procedure VPAP-2401, Rev 28, 12/14/07,  
Fire Protection Program. The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, conditions related  
to: (1) licensee control of transient combustibles and ignition sources; (2) the material  
condition, operational status, and operational lineup of fire protection systems,  
equipment, and features; and (3) the fire barriers used to prevent fire damage or fire  
propagation.  
*  
Emergency Diesel Generator 2H Unit 2 (fire zone 9A-2a / EDG-2H);  
*  
Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 1 (fire zone 6-1a / ESR-1);  
*  
Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 2 (fire zone 6-2a / ESR-2);  
*  
Emergency Diesel Generator 2J Unit 2 (fire zone 9B-2a / EDG-2J);


                                                6
6  
    *       Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14B-1a /
              MDAFW-1);
    *       Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14A-1a /
*  
              TDAFW-1)
Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14B-1a /  
    *       Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14A-2a /
MDAFW-1);  
              TDAFW-2); and,
*  
    *       Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14B-2a /
Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14A-1a /  
              MDAFW-2).
TDAFW-1)  
  b.  Findings
*  
    No findings of significance were identified.
Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14A-2a /  
1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program
TDAFW-2); and,  
  a. Inspection Scope
*  
    The inspectors reviewed a crew examination that involved a reactor coolant system
Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14B-2a /  
    (RCS) leak with a partial loss of annunciators, a loss of instrument air outside
MDAFW-2).  
    containment, a failure of 1-RC-PT-1554 that fails open a pressurizer power operated
   
    relief valve (PORV), and a rod ejection resulting in a small break loss of coolant accident
b.  
    (LOCA). The inspectors observed crew performance in terms of communications; ability
Findings
    to take timely and proper actions; prioritizing, interpreting, and verifying alarms; correct
   
    use and implementation of procedures, including the alarm response procedures; timely
 
    control board operation and manipulation, including high-risk operator actions; and
No findings of significance were identified.  
    oversight and direction provided by the shift supervisor, including the ability to identify
    and implement appropriate TS actions. The inspectors observed the post training
1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program  
    critique to determine that weaknesses or improvement areas revealed by the training
   
    were captured by the instructor and reviewed with the operators.
a.  
  b.  Findings
Inspection Scope  
    No findings of significance were identified.
1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness
The inspectors reviewed a crew examination that involved a reactor coolant system  
  a. Inspection Scope
(RCS) leak with a partial loss of annunciators, a loss of instrument air outside  
    For the four equipment issues listed below, the inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of
containment, a failure of 1-RC-PT-1554 that fails open a pressurizer power operated  
    the corresponding licensee's preventive and corrective maintenance. The inspectors
relief valve (PORV), and a rod ejection resulting in a small break loss of coolant accident  
    performed walkdowns of the accessible portions of the systems, performed in-office
(LOCA). The inspectors observed crew performance in terms of communications; ability  
    reviews of procedures and evaluations, and held discussions with system engineers.
to take timely and proper actions; prioritizing, interpreting, and verifying alarms; correct  
    The inspectors compared the licensees actions with the requirements of the
use and implementation of procedures, including the alarm response procedures; timely  
    Maintenance Rule (10 CFR 50.65) using ER-AA-MRL-10, Rev 2, 12/18/07,
control board operation and manipulation, including high-risk operator actions; and  
    Maintenance Rule Program, and Engineering Transmittal CEP-97-0018, Rev 12,
oversight and direction provided by the shift supervisor, including the ability to identify  
    08/04/99, North Anna Maintenance Rule Scoping and Performance Criteria Matrix.
and implement appropriate TS actions. The inspectors observed the post training  
critique to determine that weaknesses or improvement areas revealed by the training  
were captured by the instructor and reviewed with the operators.  
   
  b.  
Findings
   
No findings of significance were identified.  
1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness  
   
a.  
Inspection Scope  
For the four equipment issues listed below, the inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of  
the corresponding licensee's preventive and corrective maintenance. The inspectors  
performed walkdowns of the accessible portions of the systems, performed in-office  
reviews of procedures and evaluations, and held discussions with system engineers.
The inspectors compared the licensees actions with the requirements of the  
Maintenance Rule (10 CFR 50.65) using ER-AA-MRL-10, Rev 2, 12/18/07,  
Maintenance Rule Program, and Engineering Transmittal CEP-97-0018, Rev 12,  
08/04/99, North Anna Maintenance Rule Scoping and Performance Criteria Matrix.  


                                              7
7  
  *       Condition report (CR) 099531, A MRule Evaluation was not assigned for
            CR091536 and respective MRE006778, MRule Eval to Eng for 1-EE-BKR-1J1-
            1-F2 contactor failed;
*  
  *       CR096110, 1A leak to B water box vacuum breakers, for maintenance issues
Condition report (CR) 099531, A MRule Evaluation was not assigned for  
            concerning Unit 2 Condenser Outlet Waterbox vacuum break;
CR091536 and respective MRE006778, MRule Eval to Eng for 1-EE-BKR-1J1-
  *       CR098146, During maintenance run #8 air start check valve supply pipe to
1-F2 contactor failed;  
            header melted at fitting, and respective MRE006709, MRule; #8 Air Start
*  
            Ckvalve Supply Pipe to header melted at fitting;" and,
CR096110, 1A leak to B water box vacuum breakers, for maintenance issues  
  *       CR091169, "2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped," and respective MRE006467,
concerning Unit 2 Condenser Outlet Waterbox vacuum break;  
            "MRule evaluation: 2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped."
*  
b. Findings
CR098146, During maintenance run #8 air start check valve supply pipe to  
  Introduction: A self-revealing, Green, non-cited violation (NCV) of TS 5.4.1.a was
header melted at fitting, and respective MRE006709, MRule; #8 Air Start  
  identified for the failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for repair of the
Ckvalve Supply Pipe to header melted at fitting;" and,  
  Unit 1 1H EDG air start check valves.
*  
  Description: On May 7, 2008, during a maintenance run of the '1H' EDG following
CR091169, "2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped," and respective MRE006467,  
  activities associated with a scheduled 80 hour maintenance outage, the air start check
"MRule evaluation: 2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped."  
  valve associated with the #8 cylinder stuck open. This allowed combustion gas into the
  air start header, subsequently causing it to rupture due to heating of the soldered joints.
b.  
  An evaluation by the licensee determined that the self-locking nut associated with the #8
Findings  
  cylinder air start check valve had disengaged from the threaded check valve shaft and
  was oriented in such a way as to prevent the check valve from reseating. Further
  evaluation by the licensee determined that the self locking nuts were consumable items
Introduction: A self-revealing, Green, non-cited violation (NCV) of TS 5.4.1.a was  
  that were intended to be replaced with new self-locking nuts after each use. The
identified for the failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for repair of the  
  licensee determined that maintenance procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Rev 5, 05/12/06,
Unit 1 1H EDG air start check valves.
  Repair of Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, was inadequate in that
  it did not include guidance to treat the self locking nuts as consumable items. The
Description: On May 7, 2008, during a maintenance run of the '1H' EDG following  
  licensee revised maintenance procedure, 0-MCM-0701-14 and completed repairs to the
activities associated with a scheduled 80 hour maintenance outage, the air start check  
  air start check valve and air start header. The licensee also conducted inspections of
valve associated with the #8 cylinder stuck open. This allowed combustion gas into the  
  the remaining air start check valves and returned the '1H' EDG to an operable status on
air start header, subsequently causing it to rupture due to heating of the soldered joints.
  May 10, 2008.
An evaluation by the licensee determined that the self-locking nut associated with the #8  
  Analysis: The inspectors determined that the failure to adequately establish procedural
cylinder air start check valve had disengaged from the threaded check valve shaft and  
  requirements for repair of the 1H EDG air start check valves was a performance
was oriented in such a way as to prevent the check valve from reseating. Further  
  deficiency. The finding was more than minor because it impacted the mitigating systems
evaluation by the licensee determined that the self locking nuts were consumable items  
  cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that
that were intended to be replaced with new self-locking nuts after each use. The  
  respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related
licensee determined that maintenance procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Rev 5, 05/12/06,  
  attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check valves
Repair of Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, was inadequate in that  
  were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC 0609,
it did not include guidance to treat the self locking nuts as consumable items. The  
  Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green)
licensee revised maintenance procedure, 0-MCM-0701-14 and completed repairs to the  
  because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification
air start check valve and air start header. The licensee also conducted inspections of  
  deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train
the remaining air start check valves and returned the '1H' EDG to an operable status on
  being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant
May 10, 2008.  
  due to possible external events.
Analysis: The inspectors determined that the failure to adequately establish procedural  
requirements for repair of the 1H EDG air start check valves was a performance  
deficiency. The finding was more than minor because it impacted the mitigating systems  
cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that  
respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related  
attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check valves  
were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC 0609,  
Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green)  
because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification  
deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train  
being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant  
due to possible external events.  


                                                8
8  
    Enforcement: TS 5.4.1.a, requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established,
    implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in
    Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A. Specifically, Section 9 requires, in part,
Enforcement: TS 5.4.1.a, requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established,  
    that maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be
implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in  
    properly performed in accordance with written procedures and documented instructions
Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A. Specifically, Section 9 requires, in part,  
    appropriate to the circumstances. Licensee procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Repair of
that maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be  
    Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, Rev 5, 05/12/06, contains
properly performed in accordance with written procedures and documented instructions  
    instructions for rebuilding EDG air start check valves. Contrary to this, the licensee
appropriate to the circumstances. Licensee procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Repair of  
    failed to adequately establish appropriate procedural requirements in 0-MCM-0701-14 in
Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, Rev 5, 05/12/06, contains  
    that the procedure did not contain instructions to replace the consumable, self-locking
instructions for rebuilding EDG air start check valves. Contrary to this, the licensee  
    nuts for the air start check valves. Because the finding is of very low safety significance
failed to adequately establish appropriate procedural requirements in 0-MCM-0701-14 in  
    and because it has been entered into the licensees corrective action program (CAP) as
that the procedure did not contain instructions to replace the consumable, self-locking  
    CR098146, this violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section VI.A.1 of
nuts for the air start check valves. Because the finding is of very low safety significance  
    the NRC Enforcement Policy: NCV 05000338/2008003-01, Failure to Adequately
and because it has been entered into the licensees corrective action program (CAP) as  
    Establish Procedural Requirements for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H'
CR098146, this violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section VI.A.1 of  
    EDG.
the NRC Enforcement Policy: NCV 05000338/2008003-01, Failure to Adequately  
1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control
Establish Procedural Requirements for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H'  
  a. Inspection Scope
EDG.  
    The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, the four activities listed below for the following:
    (1) effectiveness of the risk assessments performed before maintenance activities were
1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control  
    conducted; (2) management of risk; (3) upon identification of an unforeseen situation,
   
    necessary steps were taken to plan and control the resulting emergent work activities;
a.  
    and (4) maintenance risk assessments and emergent work problems were adequately
Inspection Scope  
    identified and resolved. The inspectors verified that the licensee was complying with the
    requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(4) and the data output from the licensees safety
The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, the four activities listed below for the following:
    monitor associated with the risk profile of Units 1 and 2.
(1) effectiveness of the risk assessments performed before maintenance activities were  
    *       Emergent work on 1H EDG due to #8 cylinder air start check valve failure
conducted; (2) management of risk; (3) upon identification of an unforeseen situation,  
              resulting in the extension of a maintenance outage, but overall risk remained
necessary steps were taken to plan and control the resulting emergent work activities;  
              Green;
and (4) maintenance risk assessments and emergent work problems were adequately  
    *       Emergent work for instrument air leak to 'B' water box vacuum breakers; overall
identified and resolved. The inspectors verified that the licensee was complying with the  
              risk remained Green;
requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(4) and the data output from the licensees safety  
    *       Emergent entry into 0-AP-41, Rev 39, 06/06/08, Severe Weather Conditions,
monitor associated with the risk profile of Units 1 and 2.  
              due to a tornado watch which when combined with other unavailable equipment
              resulted in a yellow risk condition;
*  
    *       Emergent work due to failure of '1H' EDG battery charger; overall risk remained
Emergent work on 1H EDG due to #8 cylinder air start check valve failure  
              Green.
resulting in the extension of a maintenance outage, but overall risk remained  
  b.  Findings
Green;  
    No findings of significance were identified.
*  
Emergent work for instrument air leak to 'B' water box vacuum breakers; overall  
risk remained Green;  
*  
Emergent entry into 0-AP-41, Rev 39, 06/06/08, Severe Weather Conditions,  
due to a tornado watch which when combined with other unavailable equipment  
resulted in a yellow risk condition;  
*  
Emergent work due to failure of '1H' EDG battery charger; overall risk remained  
Green.  
   
b.  
Findings
   
No findings of significance were identified.  


                                              9
9  
1R15 Operability Evaluations
  a. Inspection Scope
    The inspectors reviewed six operability evaluations affecting the risk-significant
1R15 Operability Evaluations  
    mitigating system, listed below, to assess, as appropriate: (1) the technical adequacy of
   
    the evaluations; (2) whether continued system operability was warranted; (3) whether
a.  
    other existing degraded conditions were considered as compensating measures; (4)
Inspection Scope  
    whether the compensatory measures, if involved, were in place, would work as intended,
    and were appropriately controlled; and (5) where continued operability was considered
The inspectors reviewed six operability evaluations affecting the risk-significant  
    unjustified, the impact on TS Limiting Conditions for Operation and the risk significance
mitigating system, listed below, to assess, as appropriate: (1) the technical adequacy of  
    in accordance with the Significance Determination Process (SDP). The inspectors
the evaluations; (2) whether continued system operability was warranted; (3) whether  
    review included a verification that determinations of operability were made as specified
other existing degraded conditions were considered as compensating measures; (4)  
    by procedure VPAP-1408, Rev 4, 05/28/08, System Operability.
whether the compensatory measures, if involved, were in place, would work as intended,  
    *       CR093429, review of OD000158, Evaluate leak by of terry turbine steam supply
and were appropriately controlled; and (5) where continued operability was considered  
            valve;
unjustified, the impact on TS Limiting Conditions for Operation and the risk significance  
    *       CR092489, review of OD000154, Deflected Control Rods on 2-SW-REJ-24E;
in accordance with the Significance Determination Process (SDP). The inspectors  
    *       CR092894, review of OD000156, Evaluate wall thickness;
review included a verification that determinations of operability were made as specified  
    *       CR091976, review of OD000152, Perform OD for required actions on battery
by procedure VPAP-1408, Rev 4, 05/28/08, System Operability.  
            chargers, relative to EDGs during high winds and cold ambient conditions;
    *       CR098251, 1H EDG air stop check valve supply fitting failure - common cause
*  
            failure review; and,
CR093429, review of OD000158, Evaluate leak by of terry turbine steam supply  
    *       CR091896, review of OD000151, #1 seal o-rings installed in 1-B RCP exceeded
valve;  
            6 year life on o-rings.
*  
  b.  Findings
CR092489, review of OD000154, Deflected Control Rods on 2-SW-REJ-24E;  
    No findings of significance were identified.
*  
1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications
CR092894, review of OD000156, Evaluate wall thickness;  
  a. Inspection Scope
*  
    The inspectors reviewed selected samples of evaluations to confirm that the licensee
CR091976, review of OD000152, Perform OD for required actions on battery  
    had appropriately considered the conditions under which changes to the facility, UFSAR,
chargers, relative to EDGs during high winds and cold ambient conditions;  
    or procedures may be made, and tests conducted, without prior NRC approval. The
*  
    inspectors reviewed evaluations for eight changes and additional information, such as
CR098251, 1H EDG air stop check valve supply fitting failure - common cause  
    drawings, calculations, supporting analyses, the UFSAR, and TS to confirm that the
failure review; and,  
    licensee had appropriately concluded that the changes could be accomplished without
*  
    obtaining a license amendment. The eight evaluations reviewed are listed in the
CR091896, review of OD000151, #1 seal o-rings installed in 1-B RCP exceeded  
    Attachment to this report.
6 year life on o-rings.  
    The inspectors reviewed samples of changes for which the licensee had determined that
   
    evaluations were not required, to confirm that the licensees conclusions to screen out
b.  
    these changes were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59. The twenty-three
Findings
    screened out changes reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.
   
No findings of significance were identified.  
1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications  
   
  a.  
Inspection Scope  
 
The inspectors reviewed selected samples of evaluations to confirm that the licensee  
had appropriately considered the conditions under which changes to the facility, UFSAR,  
or procedures may be made, and tests conducted, without prior NRC approval. The  
inspectors reviewed evaluations for eight changes and additional information, such as  
drawings, calculations, supporting analyses, the UFSAR, and TS to confirm that the  
licensee had appropriately concluded that the changes could be accomplished without  
obtaining a license amendment. The eight evaluations reviewed are listed in the  
Attachment to this report.  
The inspectors reviewed samples of changes for which the licensee had determined that  
evaluations were not required, to confirm that the licensees conclusions to screen out  
these changes were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59. The twenty-three  
screened out changes reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.  


                                            10
10  
The inspectors evaluated engineering design change packages (DCPs) for fourteen
material and design based modifications to evaluate the modifications for adverse
effects on system availability, reliability, and functional capability. The fourteen
modifications and the associated attributes reviewed are as follows:
The inspectors evaluated engineering design change packages (DCPs) for fourteen  
DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (Barrier Integrity)
material and design based modifications to evaluate the modifications for adverse  
        - Materials/Replacement Components
effects on system availability, reliability, and functional capability. The fourteen  
        - Structural
modifications and the associated attributes reviewed are as follows:  
        - Licensing Basis
        - Failure Modes
DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (Barrier Integrity)  
DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000 (Mitigating Systems)
        - Materials/Replacement Components
- Materials/Replacement Components  
        - Failure Modes
        - Licensing Basis
- Structural  
        - Operations
DCP-01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005 (Mitigating
- Licensing Basis  
Systems)
        - Energy Needs
- Failure Modes  
        - Control Signals
        - Operations
DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000 (Mitigating Systems)  
        - Licensing Basis
- Materials/Replacement Components  
DCP-01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/05, (Mitigating
- Failure Modes  
Systems)
- Licensing Basis  
        - Energy Needs
- Operations  
        - Material/Replacement Components
        - Operations
DCP-01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005 (Mitigating  
        - Structural
Systems)  
        - Licensing Basis
- Energy Needs  
DCP-02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operation with Low Lake Anna Level,
- Control Signals  
10/24/2002 (Mitigating Systems)
- Operations  
        - Process Medium
- Licensing Basis  
        - Operations
DCP-02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004 (Mitigating Systems)
DCP-01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/05, (Mitigating  
        - Operations
Systems)  
        - Licensing Basis
        - Structural
- Energy Needs  
DCP-02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002
        - Energy Needs
- Material/Replacement Components  
        - Materials/Replacement Components
        - Structural
- Operations  
- Structural  
- Licensing Basis  
DCP-02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operation with Low Lake Anna Level,  
10/24/2002 (Mitigating Systems)  
- Process Medium  
- Operations  
DCP-02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004 (Mitigating Systems)  
- Operations  
- Licensing Basis  
- Structural  
DCP-02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002  
- Energy Needs  
- Materials/Replacement Components  
- Structural  


                                        11
11  
DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close Fire Protection Dampers in Unit 1&2
Emergency Switchgear Rooms, 1/13/05 (Mitigating Systems)
        - Materials/Replacement Components
DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close Fire Protection Dampers in Unit 1&2  
        - Energy Needs
Emergency Switchgear Rooms, 1/13/05 (Mitigating Systems)  
        - Operations
- Materials/Replacement Components  
DCP-05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100-hour Core Offload, 10/6/2005
- Energy Needs  
(Barrier Integrity, Mitigating Systems)
- Operations  
        - Heat Removal
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100-hour Core Offload, 10/6/2005  
DCP-05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-scale Loop, 01/11/2006
(Barrier Integrity, Mitigating Systems)  
(Mitigating Systems)
        - Energy Needs
        - Control Signals
- Heat Removal  
        - Process Medium
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/05, (Initiating Events)
- Licensing Basis  
        - Control Signals
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-scale Loop, 01/11/2006  
        - Failure Modes
(Mitigating Systems)  
DCP-05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard
- Energy Needs  
Breakers G1TH5 and G102, 02/07/2006 (Mitigating Systems)
- Control Signals  
        - Energy Needs
- Process Medium  
        - Timing
- Licensing Basis  
        - Materials/Replacement Components
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/05, (Initiating Events)  
DCP-06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006 (Mitigating Systems)
        - Energy Needs
        - Process Medium
- Control Signals  
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-07-155, CO2 Fire Protection System Design Zone 2-2 Nozzle Replacement
(Mitigating Systems)
- Licensing Basis  
        - Materials/Replacement Components
        - Energy Needs
        - Equipment Protection
- Failure Modes  
        - Operations
        - Licensing Basis
DCP-05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard  
Documents reviewed included procedures, engineering calculations, modification design
Breakers G1TH5 and G102, 02/07/2006 (Mitigating Systems)  
and implementation packages, work orders, site drawings, corrective action documents,
- Energy Needs  
applicable sections of the updated UFSAR, supporting analyses, Technical
- Timing  
Specifications, and design basis information. The inspectors additionally reviewed test
- Materials/Replacement Components  
documentation to ensure adequacy in scope and conclusion. The inspectors verified
- Licensing Basis  
DCP-06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006 (Mitigating Systems)  
- Energy Needs  
- Process Medium  
 
- Licensing Basis  
DCP-07-155, CO2 Fire Protection System Design Zone 2-2 Nozzle Replacement  
(Mitigating Systems)  
- Materials/Replacement Components  
- Energy Needs  
- Equipment Protection  
- Operations  
- Licensing Basis  
Documents reviewed included procedures, engineering calculations, modification design  
and implementation packages, work orders, site drawings, corrective action documents,  
applicable sections of the updated UFSAR, supporting analyses, Technical  
Specifications, and design basis information. The inspectors additionally reviewed test  
documentation to ensure adequacy in scope and conclusion. The inspectors verified  


                                              12
12  
    that all changes were incorporated in licensing and design basis documents and
    associated plant procedures.
    The inspectors also reviewed selected corrective action documents and the licensees
that all changes were incorporated in licensing and design basis documents and  
    recent self-assessments associated with modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 screening /
associated plant procedures.  
    evaluation issues to verify that problems were identified at an appropriate threshold,
    were entered into the corrective action process, and appropriate corrective actions had
The inspectors also reviewed selected corrective action documents and the licensees  
    been initiated and tracked to completion.
recent self-assessments associated with modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 screening /  
  b.  Findings
evaluation issues to verify that problems were identified at an appropriate threshold,  
    No findings of significance were identified.
were entered into the corrective action process, and appropriate corrective actions had  
1R19 Post Maintenance Testing
been initiated and tracked to completion.  
  a. Inspection Scope
   
    The inspectors reviewed six post maintenance test procedures and/or test activities, as
  b.  
    appropriate, for selected risk-significant mitigating systems to assess whether: (1) the
Findings
    effect of testing on the plant had been adequately addressed by control room and/or
    engineering personnel; (2) testing was adequate for the maintenance performed; (3)
   
    acceptance criteria were clear and adequately demonstrated operational readiness
No findings of significance were identified.  
    consistent with design and licensing basis documents; (4) test instrumentation had
    current calibrations, range, and accuracy consistent with the application; (5) test were
1R19 Post Maintenance Testing  
    performed as written with applicable prerequisites satisfied; (6) jumpers installed or
   
    leads lifted were properly controlled; (7) test equipment was removed following testing;
a.  
    and (8) equipment was returned to the status required to perform in accordance with
Inspection Scope  
    licensee procedure VPAP-2003, Rev 12, 05/01/07, Post Maintenance Testing
    Program.
The inspectors reviewed six post maintenance test procedures and/or test activities, as  
    *       WO 00798652-01, Obtain samples per engineering 3A Heat and Vent Exhaust
appropriate, for selected risk-significant mitigating systems to assess whether: (1) the  
              Filter Bank;
effect of testing on the plant had been adequately addressed by control room and/or  
    *       WO 00767749-01, Replace pump/motor assembly;
engineering personnel; (2) testing was adequate for the maintenance performed; (3)  
    *       WO 00804803-01 & 01A, Clean contacts on K1 relay;
acceptance criteria were clear and adequately demonstrated operational readiness  
    *       WO 00801938, Unit 2 2-SW-P-1A uncouple, couple replace seal;
consistent with design and licensing basis documents; (4) test instrumentation had  
    *       WO 00782951, Unit 2 1C Charging Pump Lube Flex Couplings - Clean Lube Oil
current calibrations, range, and accuracy consistent with the application; (5) test were  
              Coolers; and,
performed as written with applicable prerequisites satisfied; (6) jumpers installed or  
    *       WO 00790617-01, Replace MOT on 1J EDG.
leads lifted were properly controlled; (7) test equipment was removed following testing;  
  b.  Findings
and (8) equipment was returned to the status required to perform in accordance with  
    No findings of significance were identified.
licensee procedure VPAP-2003, Rev 12, 05/01/07, Post Maintenance Testing  
Program.  
*  
WO 00798652-01, Obtain samples per engineering 3A Heat and Vent Exhaust  
Filter Bank;  
*  
WO 00767749-01, Replace pump/motor assembly;  
*  
WO 00804803-01 & 01A, Clean contacts on K1 relay;  
*  
WO 00801938, Unit 2 2-SW-P-1A uncouple, couple replace seal;  
*  
WO 00782951, Unit 2 1C Charging Pump Lube Flex Couplings - Clean Lube Oil  
Coolers; and,  
*  
WO 00790617-01, Replace MOT on 1J EDG.  
   
b.  
Findings
   
No findings of significance were identified.  


                                              13
13  
1R22 Surveillance Testing
a.   Inspection Scope
    For the eight surveillance tests listed below, the inspectors examined the test procedure,
1R22 Surveillance Testing  
    witnessed testing, reviewed test records and data packages, to determine whether the
    scope of testing adequately demonstrated that the affected equipment was functional
a.  
    and operable, and that the surveillance requirements of TS were met. The inspectors
Inspection Scope  
    also determined whether the testing effectively demonstrated that the systems or
    components were operationally ready and capable of performing their intended safety
For the eight surveillance tests listed below, the inspectors examined the test procedure,  
    functions. The inspectors reviewed four in-service testing activities for a risk significant
witnessed testing, reviewed test records and data packages, to determine whether the  
    pump or valve as part of the surveillance activities.
scope of testing adequately demonstrated that the affected equipment was functional  
    In-Service Test:
and operable, and that the surveillance requirements of TS were met. The inspectors  
    *       1-PT-63.1A.2, Quench Spray System - A Subsystem Comprehensive Pump
also determined whether the testing effectively demonstrated that the systems or  
            Test, Revision 12;
components were operationally ready and capable of performing their intended safety  
    *       2-PT-213.7B, Valve Inservice Inspection (B Train of Recirc Spray System),
functions. The inspectors reviewed four in-service testing activities for a risk significant  
            Revision 12;
pump or valve as part of the surveillance activities.  
    *       2-PT-64.4B.2, Casing Cooling Pump (2-RS-P-3B) Biennial IST Comprehensive
            Pump Test, Revision 3;
In-Service Test:  
    *       1-PT-71.3Q.1, 1-FW-P-3B, B Motor-Driven AFW Pump IST Comprehensive
            Pump Test and Valve Testing, Revision 3;
*  
    *       2-PT-75.2B, Service Water Pump (2-SW-P-1B) Quarterly Test, Revision 48;
1-PT-63.1A.2, Quench Spray System - A Subsystem Comprehensive Pump  
            and,
Test, Revision 12;  
    *       2-PT-14.1, Charging Pump 2-CH-P-1A, Revision 44.
*  
    Other Surveillance Tests:
2-PT-213.7B, Valve Inservice Inspection (B Train of Recirc Spray System),
    *       2-PT-33.10, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant
Revision 12;  
            Pump Bus 2A Underfrequency, Revision 9; and,
*  
    *       2-PT-33.7, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant
2-PT-64.4B.2, Casing Cooling Pump (2-RS-P-3B) Biennial IST Comprehensive  
            Pump Bus 2A Undervoltage, Revision 10.
Pump Test, Revision 3;  
  b.  Findings
*  
    No findings of significance were identified.
1-PT-71.3Q.1, 1-FW-P-3B, B Motor-Driven AFW Pump IST Comprehensive  
4.   OTHER ACTIVITIES
Pump Test and Valve Testing, Revision 3;  
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
*  
  a. Inspection Scope
2-PT-75.2B, Service Water Pump (2-SW-P-1B) Quarterly Test, Revision 48;  
    The inspectors reviewed the licensees procedures for developing the data for the
and,  
    Barrier Integrity PI which are: (1) RCS Specific Activity; and (2) RCS Leakage. The
*  
    inspectors examined data reported to the NRC for the period April 2007 through March
2-PT-14.1, Charging Pump 2-CH-P-1A, Revision 44.  
Other Surveillance Tests:  
*  
2-PT-33.10, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant  
Pump Bus 2A Underfrequency, Revision 9; and,  
*  
2-PT-33.7, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant  
Pump Bus 2A Undervoltage, Revision 10.  
   
b.  
Findings
   
No findings of significance were identified.  
4.  
OTHER ACTIVITIES  
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification  
   
  a.  
Inspection Scope  
The inspectors reviewed the licensees procedures for developing the data for the
Barrier Integrity PI which are: (1) RCS Specific Activity; and (2) RCS Leakage. The  
inspectors examined data reported to the NRC for the period April 2007 through March  


                                              14
14  
    2008. Procedural guidance for reporting PI information and records used by the
    licensee to identify potential PI occurrences were also reviewed for both units. The
    inspectors reviewed the licensee event reports, corrective action program documents,
2008. Procedural guidance for reporting PI information and records used by the  
    and maintenance rules records as part of the verification process. The inspection was
licensee to identify potential PI occurrences were also reviewed for both units. The  
    conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, Performance Indicator
inspectors reviewed the licensee event reports, corrective action program documents,  
    Verification. The applicable planning standards, 10 CFR 50.0 and NEI 99-02,
and maintenance rules records as part of the verification process. The inspection was  
    Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, were used as reference
conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, Performance Indicator  
    criteria.
Verification. The applicable planning standards, 10 CFR 50.0 and NEI 99-02,  
   b. Findings
Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, were used as reference  
    No findings of significance were identified.
criteria.  
4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems
.1   Review of items Entered into the Corrective Action Program:
   b.  
    As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,
Findings  
    and in order to help identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance
    issues for follow-up, the inspectors performed a daily screening of items entered into the
No findings of significance were identified.  
    licensees CAP. This review was accomplished by reviewing daily CR report summaries
    and periodically attending daily CR Review Team meetings.
4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems  
.2   Semi-Annual Review to Identify Trends
   a. Inspection Scope
.1  
    As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,
Review of items Entered into the Corrective Action Program:  
    the inspectors performed a review of the licensees corrective action program and
    associated documents to identify trends that could indicate the existence of a more
As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,  
    significant safety issue. The inspectors review was focused on repetitive equipment and
and in order to help identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance  
    corrective maintenance issues but also considered the results of daily inspector
issues for follow-up, the inspectors performed a daily screening of items entered into the  
    corrective action program item screening. The review also included issues documented
licensees CAP. This review was accomplished by reviewing daily CR report summaries  
    outside the normal correction action program in system health reports, corrective
and periodically attending daily CR Review Team meetings.  
    maintenance works orders, component status reports, site monthly meeting reports and
    maintenance rule assessments. The inspectors review nominally considered the six-
.2  
    month period of January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008. The inspectors compared and
Semi-Annual Review to Identify Trends  
    contrasted their results with the results contained in the licensees latest integrated
    quarterly assessment report. Corrective actions associated with a sample of the issues
   a.  
    identified in the licensees trend report were reviewed for adequacy.
Inspection Scope  
   b. Assessments and Observations
    No findings of significance were identified. In general, the licensee has identified trends
As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,  
    and has appropriately addressed the trends with their CAP. However, the inspectors
the inspectors performed a review of the licensees corrective action program and  
    identified an adverse trend in the completion quality of safety-related work order
associated documents to identify trends that could indicate the existence of a more  
    packages which may contain procedures used for performing maintenance or post-
significant safety issue. The inspectors review was focused on repetitive equipment and  
    maintenance tests (PMT). Specifically, the following deficiencies are indicated below:
corrective maintenance issues but also considered the results of daily inspector  
corrective action program item screening. The review also included issues documented  
outside the normal correction action program in system health reports, corrective  
maintenance works orders, component status reports, site monthly meeting reports and  
maintenance rule assessments. The inspectors review nominally considered the six-
month period of January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008. The inspectors compared and  
contrasted their results with the results contained in the licensees latest integrated  
quarterly assessment report. Corrective actions associated with a sample of the issues  
identified in the licensees trend report were reviewed for adequacy.  
   b.  
Assessments and Observations  
No findings of significance were identified. In general, the licensee has identified trends  
and has appropriately addressed the trends with their CAP. However, the inspectors  
identified an adverse trend in the completion quality of safety-related work order  
packages which may contain procedures used for performing maintenance or post-
maintenance tests (PMT). Specifically, the following deficiencies are indicated below:  


                                                15
15  
      *       WO 00787908-01: NRC identified incomplete foreign material exclusion (FME)
              checklist; incorrect date, incorrect step completion.
      *       WO 00796258-01: NRC identified no radiation work permit identified; incomplete
              FME checklist, incorrect dates; incorrect step completion.
*  
      *       WO 00801525-01: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was
WO 00787908-01: NRC identified incomplete foreign material exclusion (FME)  
              not performed.
checklist; incorrect date, incorrect step completion.  
      *       WO 00801935-01: NRC identified missing signatures for work completion.
*  
      *       WO 00797498-01: Licensee identified missing FME checklist; missing Lift/Land
WO 00796258-01: NRC identified no radiation work permit identified; incomplete  
              Lead sheet.
FME checklist, incorrect dates; incorrect step completion.  
      *       WO 00767749-01: NRC identified missing page of FME checklist; incorrect step
*  
              completion.
WO 00801525-01: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was  
      *       WO 00783887-02: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was
not performed.  
              not performed.
*  
      *       WO 00790617-01: NRC identified missing FME checklist.
WO 00801935-01: NRC identified missing signatures for work completion.  
      The licensee acknowledged the identified trend and entered all of the above
*  
      discrepancies into their CAP for appropriate corrective action.
WO 00797498-01: Licensee identified missing FME checklist; missing Lift/Land  
.3   Annual Samples
Lead sheet.  
      CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings Installed on 1-B-RCP
*  
  a. Inspection Scope
WO 00767749-01: NRC identified missing page of FME checklist; incorrect step  
      The inspectors reviewed the licensees assessments and corrective actions for
completion.  
      CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings installed in 1-B RCP seal reach the end of qualified life.
*  
      The condition report was reviewed to ensure that the full extent of the issue was
WO 00783887-02: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was  
      identified, an appropriate evaluation was performed, and appropriate corrective actions
not performed.  
      were specified and prioritized. The inspectors also evaluated the CR against the
*  
      requirements of the licensees CAP as specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2,
WO 00790617-01: NRC identified missing FME checklist.  
      05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
   b.  Findings
The licensee acknowledged the identified trend and entered all of the above  
      No findings of significance were identified. On February 2, 2008, Unit 2 was removed
discrepancies into their CAP for appropriate corrective action.  
      from service because of degrading seal performance on the A RCP. During the
      licensees root cause evaluation, RCE000219, a procedural error was discovered in
.3  
      preventative maintenance procedure for RCP seals, 0-MPM-0110-01, Rev 19, 03/06/06,
Annual Samples  
      Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Injection, that involved replacement of the #1 seal high
      temperature o-rings. Specifically, the procedure states that the applicable o-ring service
CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings Installed on 1-B-RCP
      history and current leak data must be reviewed, and if the o-rings have been installed
      greater than 9 years or the #1 seal leak rate changes by greater than 0.3 gallons per
  a.  
      minute, then component engineering must perform an evaluation to determine
Inspection Scope  
      requirements for inspection or seal replacement. However, the seal vendor technical
      manual recommends replacement of the #1 seal ring and runner o-rings every 45,000
The inspectors reviewed the licensees assessments and corrective actions for  
      hours of operation or 6 years. The licensee reviewed seal replacement history for both
CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings installed in 1-B RCP seal reach the end of qualified life.
The condition report was reviewed to ensure that the full extent of the issue was  
identified, an appropriate evaluation was performed, and appropriate corrective actions  
were specified and prioritized. The inspectors also evaluated the CR against the  
requirements of the licensees CAP as specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2,
05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.  
   b.  
Findings
   
No findings of significance were identified. On February 2, 2008, Unit 2 was removed  
from service because of degrading seal performance on the A RCP. During the  
licensees root cause evaluation, RCE000219, a procedural error was discovered in  
preventative maintenance procedure for RCP seals, 0-MPM-0110-01, Rev 19, 03/06/06,  
Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Injection, that involved replacement of the #1 seal high  
temperature o-rings. Specifically, the procedure states that the applicable o-ring service  
history and current leak data must be reviewed, and if the o-rings have been installed  
greater than 9 years or the #1 seal leak rate changes by greater than 0.3 gallons per  
minute, then component engineering must perform an evaluation to determine  
requirements for inspection or seal replacement. However, the seal vendor technical  
manual recommends replacement of the #1 seal ring and runner o-rings every 45,000  
hours of operation or 6 years. The licensee reviewed seal replacement history for both  


                                              16
16  
    units and determined that the Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal high temperature o-rings were
    installed in October, 2001, but were not replaced during a subsequent refueling outage
    in 2007. The licensee initiated CR091896 for corrective action and performed an
units and determined that the Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal high temperature o-rings were  
    apparent cause evaluation, ACE013661, which determined a cause category of
installed in October, 2001, but were not replaced during a subsequent refueling outage  
    inadequate written instructions.
in 2007. The licensee initiated CR091896 for corrective action and performed an  
    The inspectors reviewed ACE013661 and verified the cause and related corrective
apparent cause evaluation, ACE013661, which determined a cause category of  
    actions. The inspectors also noted and reviewed compensatory measures, described
inadequate written instructions.  
    below, initiated by the licensee due to the potential impact of a seal failure on the
    licensees 10 CFR 50, Appendix R analysis.
The inspectors reviewed ACE013661 and verified the cause and related corrective  
    *       Initiate trending of Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal parameters for indications of degrading
actions. The inspectors also noted and reviewed compensatory measures, described  
            performance.
below, initiated by the licensee due to the potential impact of a seal failure on the  
    *       Establish a twice per shift fire watch in the auxiliary building areas involving the
licensees 10 CFR 50, Appendix R analysis.  
            charging pumps, component cooling (CC) pumps and respective power supply
            cables to reduce the risk of an fire resulting in a loss of normal and backup seal
*  
            cooling.
Initiate trending of Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal parameters for indications of degrading  
    *       Establish zones prohibiting transient combustibles within 20 feet of Unit 1
performance.  
            charging pump power cables and reschedule any hot work involving
*  
            components in the areas of the charging pumps, CC pumps and respective
Establish a twice per shift fire watch in the auxiliary building areas involving the  
            power cables. This protects the unit charging cross-tie function.
charging pumps, component cooling (CC) pumps and respective power supply  
    The inspectors will continue to monitor the licensees compensatory actions. The
cables to reduce the risk of an fire resulting in a loss of normal and backup seal  
    inspectors also verified initiation of WO 00802328-01 to replace all o-rings in the Unit 2
cooling.  
    B RCP #1 seal and actions to correct 0-MPM-0110-01.
*  
    CR094772, 2H EDG Oil Leakage Increasing and CR101714, Technical Specification
Establish zones prohibiting transient combustibles within 20 feet of Unit 1  
    Violation for Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable for Greater Than Allowed Completion
charging pump power cables and reschedule any hot work involving  
    Time
components in the areas of the charging pumps, CC pumps and respective  
a. Inspection Scope
power cables. This protects the unit charging cross-tie function.  
    The inspectors reviewed CR094772, "2H diesel oil leakage increasing," and related CRs
    to ensure that the full extent of the issue was identified, an appropriate evaluation was
The inspectors will continue to monitor the licensees compensatory actions. The  
    performed, and appropriate corrective actions were specified and prioritized. The
inspectors also verified initiation of WO 00802328-01 to replace all o-rings in the Unit 2  
    inspectors also evaluated the CR against the requirements of the licensees CAP as
B RCP #1 seal and actions to correct 0-MPM-0110-01.  
    specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2, 05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and
    10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
CR094772, 2H EDG Oil Leakage Increasing and CR101714, Technical Specification  
  b. Findings
Violation for Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable for Greater Than Allowed Completion  
    No findings of significance were identified. On April 5, 2008, the licensee identified
Time
    increasing oil leakage on the '2H' EDG exhaust manifolds and performed an air roll of
    the EDG which indicated the cylinders had excessive oil accumulation. The licensee
a.  
    subsequently determined that the wrong size impeller had been installed in the standby
Inspection Scope  
    lube oil pump during a maintenance outage that occurred from March 24, 2008, through
    March 29, 2008. The enforcement aspects are discussed in section 4OA7 of this report.
The inspectors reviewed CR094772, "2H diesel oil leakage increasing," and related CRs  
    When the licensee declared '2H' EDG inoperable, they also declared the Unit 2 A SW
to ensure that the full extent of the issue was identified, an appropriate evaluation was  
performed, and appropriate corrective actions were specified and prioritized. The  
inspectors also evaluated the CR against the requirements of the licensees CAP as  
specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2, 05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and  
10 CFR 50, Appendix B.
   
  b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified. On April 5, 2008, the licensee identified  
increasing oil leakage on the '2H' EDG exhaust manifolds and performed an air roll of  
the EDG which indicated the cylinders had excessive oil accumulation. The licensee  
subsequently determined that the wrong size impeller had been installed in the standby  
lube oil pump during a maintenance outage that occurred from March 24, 2008, through  
March 29, 2008. The enforcement aspects are discussed in section 4OA7 of this report.
When the licensee declared '2H' EDG inoperable, they also declared the Unit 2 A SW  


                                                17
17  
    pump inoperable on April 5, 2008, in accordance with TS 3.8.1, due to inoperability of
    the Unit 1 B SW pump, which was removed from service on April 1, 2008, and entered
    a 72 hour LCO under TS 3.7.8. The Unit 1 B SW pump was subsequently returned to
pump inoperable on April 5, 2008, in accordance with TS 3.8.1, due to inoperability of  
    service on April 6, 2008, and 2H EDG was returned to service on April 9, 2008. The
the Unit 1 B SW pump, which was removed from service on April 1, 2008, and entered  
    inspectors determined that the licensee correctly implemented Technical Specifications
a 72 hour LCO under TS 3.7.8. The Unit 1 B SW pump was subsequently returned to  
    from the time the service water pumps and EDG were declared inoperable; therefore,
service on April 6, 2008, and 2H EDG was returned to service on April 9, 2008. The  
    there was no performance deficiency.
inspectors determined that the licensee correctly implemented Technical Specifications  
    The inspectors reviewed the completed root cause evaluation, RCE000225, and related
from the time the service water pumps and EDG were declared inoperable; therefore,  
    documents including the licensees probabilistic risk analysis. The inspectors
there was no performance deficiency.  
    determined that the installation of the incorrect impeller affected the EDG operability,
    which also affected the operability of the associated service water pump. The inspectors
The inspectors reviewed the completed root cause evaluation, RCE000225, and related  
    noted that although the Unit 2 A SW pump was technically inoperable, it remained
documents including the licensees probabilistic risk analysis. The inspectors  
    available based on the availability of its normal power supply. The licensee entered this
determined that the installation of the incorrect impeller affected the EDG operability,  
    problem into their CAP as CR101714 and submitted Licensee Event Report 05000338,
which also affected the operability of the associated service water pump. The inspectors  
    339/2008-001-00 to document the problem.
noted that although the Unit 2 A SW pump was technically inoperable, it remained  
4OA3 Event Followup
available based on the availability of its normal power supply. The licensee entered this  
  .1 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000339/2007-004-00 and Revised LER
problem into their CAP as CR101714 and submitted Licensee Event Report 05000338,  
    05000339/2007-004-01: Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow with
339/2008-001-00 to document the problem.  
    Power Greater Than 30 Percent
    On December 25, 2007, at 2110 hours, with Unit 2 at approximately full rated thermal
4OA3 Event Followup  
    power an automatic reactor trip occurred due to loss of coolant flow in the B loop. The
   
    cause was determined to be a trip of the B RCP motor due to actuation of the neutral
  .1  
    over current protection relay. The licensee installed a spare motor in order to return the
(Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000339/2007-004-00 and Revised LER  
    unit to service. The licensee documented the corrective actions associated with this
05000339/2007-004-01: Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow with  
    event in CR027748. The inspectors reviewed the LER and related cause evaluations.
Power Greater Than 30 Percent  
    This LER is closed.
  .2 (Closed) LER 05000338, 339/2008-001-00: Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable
On December 25, 2007, at 2110 hours, with Unit 2 at approximately full rated thermal  
    Greater Than Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time.
power an automatic reactor trip occurred due to loss of coolant flow in the B loop. The  
    On April 1, 2008, the Unit 1 B SW pump was removed from service for motor
cause was determined to be a trip of the B RCP motor due to actuation of the neutral  
    maintenance. On April 5, 2008, the Unit 2 2H EDG was declared inoperable due to
over current protection relay. The licensee installed a spare motor in order to return the  
    excessive oil leakage from the exhaust manifolds. In compliance with TS, inoperability
unit to service. The licensee documented the corrective actions associated with this  
    of the 2H EDG also rendered the Unit 2 A SW pump inoperable resulting in a 72 hour
event in CR027748. The inspectors reviewed the LER and related cause evaluations.
    LCO per TS 3.7.8 for the SW system. Subsequently, the cause of the 2H EDG
This LER is closed.  
    inoperability was identified as an incorrect impeller installed in the associated standby
   
    lube oil pump during a maintenance outage for the 2H EDG from March 24 through
  .2  
    March 29, 2008. Consequently, the two SW pumps were inoperable for greater than the
(Closed) LER 05000338, 339/2008-001-00: Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable  
    TS allowed completion time. The inspectors completed a review of the LER and related
Greater Than Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time.  
    corrective action documents.
On April 1, 2008, the Unit 1 B SW pump was removed from service for motor  
maintenance. On April 5, 2008, the Unit 2 2H EDG was declared inoperable due to  
excessive oil leakage from the exhaust manifolds. In compliance with TS, inoperability  
of the 2H EDG also rendered the Unit 2 A SW pump inoperable resulting in a 72 hour  
LCO per TS 3.7.8 for the SW system. Subsequently, the cause of the 2H EDG  
inoperability was identified as an incorrect impeller installed in the associated standby  
lube oil pump during a maintenance outage for the 2H EDG from March 24 through  
March 29, 2008. Consequently, the two SW pumps were inoperable for greater than the  
TS allowed completion time. The inspectors completed a review of the LER and related  
corrective action documents.  


                                              18
18  
4OA5 Other Activities
.1   (Closed) Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166, Pressurized Water reactor Containment
    Sump Blockage (NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2
4OA5 Other Activities  
  a. Inspection Scope
    The inspector reviewed the status of the implementation of the licensees actions in
.1  
    response to Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on
(Closed) Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166, Pressurized Water reactor Containment  
    Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors,
Sump Blockage (NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2  
    for Units 1 and 2. The onsite inspections which verified the installation of modifications
   
    were performed in April and October of 2007 (NRC Report Nos.: 50-338,339/2007003
  a.  
    and 50-338,339/2007005). The licensees GL 2004-02 commitments which were
Inspection Scope  
    incomplete at the time of the on-site inspections included chemical effects and
    downstream effects analyses to support the installed strainer design and program
The inspector reviewed the status of the implementation of the licensees actions in  
    changes to assure the assumptions of the GL 2004-02 /GSI-191 design basis
response to Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on  
    assumptions remained valid. The inspector requested information to review the status of
Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors,  
    the incomplete commitment items and performed an in-office review during the week of
for Units 1 and 2. The onsite inspections which verified the installation of modifications  
    May 5-9, 2008, to verify completion of the outstanding commitment items.
were performed in April and October of 2007 (NRC Report Nos.: 50-338,339/2007003  
    The inspector reviewed the licensee design and licensing documentation to verify that
and 50-338,339/2007005). The licensees GL 2004-02 commitments which were  
    the GL 2004-02 modifications and program changes were complete and to determine
incomplete at the time of the on-site inspections included chemical effects and  
    the status of GL 2004-02 commitments which were not completed during the previous
downstream effects analyses to support the installed strainer design and program  
    onsite inspections
changes to assure the assumptions of the GL 2004-02 /GSI-191 design basis  
  b.  Findings
assumptions remained valid. The inspector requested information to review the status of  
    No findings of significance were identified. Plant physical modifications and program
the incomplete commitment items and performed an in-office review during the week of  
    changes identified in the licensees initial and supplemental responses to GL 2004-02
May 5-9, 2008, to verify completion of the outstanding commitment items.  
    were complete.
    The chemical effects and downstream analyses were not complete. A completion date
The inspector reviewed the licensee design and licensing documentation to verify that  
    extension for these analyses was granted until May 31, 2008 (USNRC letter to VEPCO,
the GL 2004-02 modifications and program changes were complete and to determine  
    dated 12/13/07). The licensee requested additional extension to September 30, 2008
the status of GL 2004-02 commitments which were not completed during the previous  
    (Dominion letter to USNRC, dated May 22, 2008). Any additional plant changes
onsite inspections  
    identified as a result of these analyses will be reviewed via the routine design control
   
    inspection activity implemented by the existing reactor oversight program.
  b.  
    A violation was identified and documented in a previous NRC inspection report related to
Findings
    implementation of the GL 2004-02 strainer modification, NCV 05000339/2008002-04,
   
    Inadequate Design Control Involving Unit 2 Containment Sump Strainer Gaps.
No findings of significance were identified. Plant physical modifications and program  
    This documentation of TI-2515/166 completion as well as any results of sampling audits
changes identified in the licensees initial and supplemental responses to GL 2004-02  
    of licensee actions will be reviewed by the NRC staff (Office of Nuclear Reactor
were complete.  
    Regulation - NRR) as input along with the GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris
    Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-
The chemical effects and downstream analyses were not complete. A completion date  
    Water Reactors responses to support closure of GL 2004-02 and Generic Safety Issue
extension for these analyses was granted until May 31, 2008 (USNRC letter to VEPCO,  
    (GSI)-191 Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor (PWR)
dated 12/13/07). The licensee requested additional extension to September 30, 2008  
(Dominion letter to USNRC, dated May 22, 2008). Any additional plant changes  
identified as a result of these analyses will be reviewed via the routine design control  
inspection activity implemented by the existing reactor oversight program.  
A violation was identified and documented in a previous NRC inspection report related to  
implementation of the GL 2004-02 strainer modification, NCV 05000339/2008002-04,  
Inadequate Design Control Involving Unit 2 Containment Sump Strainer Gaps.  
This documentation of TI-2515/166 completion as well as any results of sampling audits  
of licensee actions will be reviewed by the NRC staff (Office of Nuclear Reactor  
Regulation - NRR) as input along with the GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris  
Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-
Water Reactors responses to support closure of GL 2004-02 and Generic Safety Issue  
(GSI)-191 Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor (PWR)  


                                              19
19  
    Sump Performance." The NRC will notify each licensee by letter of the results of the
    overall assessment as to whether GSI-191 and GL 2004-02 have been satisfactorily
    addressed at that licensees plant(s). Completion of TI-2515/166 does not necessarily
Sump Performance." The NRC will notify each licensee by letter of the results of the  
    indicate that a licensee has finished all testing and analyses needed to demonstrate the
overall assessment as to whether GSI-191 and GL 2004-02 have been satisfactorily  
    adequacy of their modifications and procedure changes. Licensees may also have
addressed at that licensees plant(s). Completion of TI-2515/166 does not necessarily  
    obtained approval of plant-specific extensions that allow for later implementation of plant
indicate that a licensee has finished all testing and analyses needed to demonstrate the  
    modifications. Licensees will confirm completion of all corrective actions to the NRC.
adequacy of their modifications and procedure changes. Licensees may also have  
    The NRC will track all such yet-to-be-performed items identified in the TI-2515/166
obtained approval of plant-specific extensions that allow for later implementation of plant  
    inspection reports to completion and may choose to inspect implementation of some or
modifications. Licensees will confirm completion of all corrective actions to the NRC.
    all of them.
The NRC will track all such yet-to-be-performed items identified in the TI-2515/166  
.2   Quarterly Resident Inspector Observations of Security Personnel and Activities
inspection reports to completion and may choose to inspect implementation of some or  
  a. Inspection Scope
all of them.  
    During the inspection period, the inspectors conducted observations of security force
    personnel and activities to ensure that the activities were consistent with the licensee
.2  
    security procedures and regulatory requirements relating to nuclear plant security.
Quarterly Resident Inspector Observations of Security Personnel and Activities  
    These observations took place during both normal and off-normal plant working hours.
   
    These quarterly resident inspector observations of security force personnel and activities
a.  
    did not constitute additional inspection samples. They were considered an integral part
Inspection Scope  
    of the inspectors normal plant status review.
  b.  Findings
During the inspection period, the inspectors conducted observations of security force  
    No findings of significance were identified.
personnel and activities to ensure that the activities were consistent with the licensee  
  .3 Review of the Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
security procedures and regulatory requirements relating to nuclear plant security.
    (Inspection Procedure 60855.1)
These observations took place during both normal and off-normal plant working hours.  
  a. Inspection Scope
    Inspectors reviewed the normal operations of the ISFSI. The inspectors walked down
These quarterly resident inspector observations of security force personnel and activities  
    the ISFSI pad to assess the material condition of the casks, the installation of security
did not constitute additional inspection samples. They were considered an integral part  
    equipment, and the performance of the monitoring systems. In preparation for an
of the inspectors normal plant status review.  
    upcoming cask load involving the NUHOMS design the inspectors reviewed licensee
   
    cask loading and handling procedures and reviewed previous cask loading and ISFSI
b.  
    related plant issues and corrective actions status. Additionally, the inspectors observed
Findings
    cask loading during the week of June 2, 2008, to verify that work was performed in
   
    accordance with approved procedures and that loaded fuel assemblies were identified
No findings of significance were identified.  
    and recorded in a controlled document.
   
  b. Findings
  .3  
    No findings of significance were identified.
Review of the Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation  
(Inspection Procedure 60855.1)  
    a.  
Inspection Scope  
Inspectors reviewed the normal operations of the ISFSI. The inspectors walked down  
the ISFSI pad to assess the material condition of the casks, the installation of security  
equipment, and the performance of the monitoring systems. In preparation for an  
upcoming cask load involving the NUHOMS design the inspectors reviewed licensee  
cask loading and handling procedures and reviewed previous cask loading and ISFSI  
related plant issues and corrective actions status. Additionally, the inspectors observed  
cask loading during the week of June 2, 2008, to verify that work was performed in  
accordance with approved procedures and that loaded fuel assemblies were identified  
and recorded in a controlled document.  
    b.  
Findings  
No findings of significance were identified.  


                                              20
20  
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
.1   Exit Meeting Summary
    On July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008, the senior resident inspector presented the
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit  
    inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Dan Stoddard and
    other members of the staff. The licensee acknowledged the findings. The inspectors
.1  
    asked the licensee whether any of the material examined during the inspection should
Exit Meeting Summary  
    be considered proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.
    On August 22, 2008, the Acting Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 5 presented the revised
On July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008, the senior resident inspector presented the  
    inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Page Kemp.
inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Dan Stoddard and  
.2   Temporary Instruction 2515/166 Exit Meeting
other members of the staff. The licensee acknowledged the findings. The inspectors  
    An interim meeting was conducted via telephone on May 27, 2008 with Mr. P. Kemp.
asked the licensee whether any of the material examined during the inspection should  
.3   10 CFR 50.59, Modifications Exit Meeting
be considered proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.  
    An interim exit meeting with licensee management and staff was conducted on June 4,
    2008, to discuss the results of this inspection. Proprietary information, reviewed by the
On August 22, 2008, the Acting Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 5 presented the revised  
    team as part of routine inspection activities, was returned to the licensee in accordance
inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Page Kemp.  
    with prescribed controls.
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
.2  
    The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the
Temporary Instruction 2515/166 Exit Meeting  
    licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of Section VI of
    the NRC Enforcement Policy, NUREG-1600 for characterization as a NCV:
An interim meeting was conducted via telephone on May 27, 2008 with Mr. P. Kemp.  
    *   10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires in part that activities affecting quality
        shall be prescribed and accomplished by documented instructions of a type
.3  
        appropriate to the circumstances. Contrary to this, on April 5, 2008, the instructions
10 CFR 50.59, Modifications Exit Meeting  
        involving a part number for a pump impeller in a work order to repair the standby
        lube oil pump were incorrectly prescribed and accomplished. This issue is in the
An interim exit meeting with licensee management and staff was conducted on June 4,  
        licensees CAP as CR094772 (4OA3).
2008, to discuss the results of this inspection. Proprietary information, reviewed by the  
ATTACHMENT: SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
team as part of routine inspection activities, was returned to the licensee in accordance  
with prescribed controls.  
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations  
The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the  
licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of Section VI of  
the NRC Enforcement Policy, NUREG-1600 for characterization as a NCV:  
*  
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires in part that activities affecting quality  
shall be prescribed and accomplished by documented instructions of a type  
appropriate to the circumstances. Contrary to this, on April 5, 2008, the instructions  
involving a part number for a pump impeller in a work order to repair the standby  
lube oil pump were incorrectly prescribed and accomplished. This issue is in the  
licensees CAP as CR094772 (4OA3).
ATTACHMENT: SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION


                              SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
                                  KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel:
Attachment
V. Armentrout, SG Programs, ISI Corporate
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
J. Bailey, Manager Vendor Quality
J. Breeden, Supervisor, Radioactive Analysis and Material Control
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT  
W. Corbin, Director, Nuclear Engineering
R. Evans, Manager, Radiological Protection and Chemistry
R. Foster, Supply Chain Manager
Licensee personnel:  
E. Hendrixson, Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing
S. Hughes, Manager, Nuclear Operations
V. Armentrout, SG Programs, ISI Corporate  
P. Kemp, Supervisor, Station Licensing
J. Bailey, Manager Vendor Quality  
J. Kirkpatrick, Manager, Nuclear Maintenance
J. Breeden, Supervisor, Radioactive Analysis and Material Control  
L. Lane, Plant Manager
W. Corbin, Director, Nuclear Engineering  
G. Lear, Manager, Organizational Effectiveness
R. Evans, Manager, Radiological Protection and Chemistry  
J. Leberstien, Licensing Technical Consultant
R. Foster, Supply Chain Manager  
T. Maddy, Manager, Nuclear Protection Services
E. Hendrixson, Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing  
M. Main, Component Engineer
S. Hughes, Manager, Nuclear Operations  
G. Marshall, Manager, Nuclear Outage and Planning
P. Kemp, Supervisor, Station Licensing  
C. McClain, Manager, Nuclear Training
J. Kirkpatrick, Manager, Nuclear Maintenance  
J. McHale, Engineering Supervisor
L. Lane, Plant Manager  
F. Mladen, Manager, Nuclear Site Services
G. Lear, Manager, Organizational Effectiveness  
B. Morrison, Supervisor Nuclear Engineering
J. Leberstien, Licensing Technical Consultant  
J. Rayman, Nuclear Emergency Preparedness
T. Maddy, Manager, Nuclear Protection Services  
J. Scott, Supervisor, Nuclear Training (operations)
M. Main, Component Engineer  
D. Stoddard, Site Vice President
G. Marshall, Manager, Nuclear Outage and Planning  
R. Williams, Component Engineer
C. McClain, Manager, Nuclear Training  
                    LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED
J. McHale, Engineering Supervisor  
Opened and Closed
F. Mladen, Manager, Nuclear Site Services  
05000338/2008003-01           NCV     Failure to Adequately Establish Procedural Requirements
B. Morrison, Supervisor Nuclear Engineering  
                                      for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H' EDG
J. Rayman, Nuclear Emergency Preparedness  
                                      (1R12)
J. Scott, Supervisor, Nuclear Training (operations)  
Closed
D. Stoddard, Site Vice President  
2515/166                     TI     Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Sump Blockage
R. Williams, Component Engineer  
                                      (NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2 (Section
                                      4OA5.1)
                                                                                      Attachment
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED  
Opened and Closed  
05000338/2008003-01  
NCV  
Failure to Adequately Establish Procedural Requirements  
for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H' EDG  
(1R12)  
Closed  
2515/166  
TI  
Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Sump Blockage  
(NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2 (Section  
4OA5.1)


                                      A-2
A-2  
05000339/2007-004-00     LER Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With
                              Power Greater Than 30 Percent
05000339/2007-004-01     LER Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With
Attachment
                              Power Greater Than 30 Percent (Revised)
05000339/2007-004-00  
05000338, 339/2008-001-00 LER Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable Greater Than
LER  
                              Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time
Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With
Discussed
Power Greater Than 30 Percent  
05000339/2007-004-01  
LER  
Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With  
Power Greater Than 30 Percent (Revised)  
05000338, 339/2008-001-00 LER  
Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable Greater Than
Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time  
Discussed  
None
None
                                                                            Attachment


                                            A-3
A-3  
                            LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Section 1R17: Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant
Modifications
Attachment
Full Evaluations
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED  
*     99-SE-MOD-04, Fuel Assembly Repair 4/15/1999
*     06-SE-MOD-01, Abandonment of Incore Thermocouples, 3/29/2006
Section 1R17: Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant  
*     06-SE-OT-01, Reload Safety Evaluation, 3/31/2006
Modifications  
*     06-SE-OT-02, Technical Report NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety
Full Evaluations  
      Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE, 3/31/2006
*  
*     07-SE-OT-01, Reduced Recirculation Spray Pump Flowrates, 9/3/2007
99-SE-MOD-04, Fuel Assembly Repair 4/15/1999  
*     07-SE-ST-01, Special Test Procedure, 0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door
*  
      Test, 8/27/2007
06-SE-MOD-01, Abandonment of Incore Thermocouples, 3/29/2006  
*     DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (associated with 99-SE-MOD-04)
*  
*     DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000
06-SE-OT-01, Reload Safety Evaluation, 3/31/2006  
*     TSCR N-018, Eliminate Transmitter Response Time Testing Requirements, 9/11/2007
*  
Screened Out Items - Modifications
06-SE-OT-02, Technical Report NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety
*     DCP 01-121, Safety Injection (SI) Accumulator Nozzle Replacement, 3/17/2001
Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE, 3/31/2006  
*     DCP 01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005
*  
*     DCP 01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/2005
07-SE-OT-01, Reduced Recirculation Spray Pump Flowrates, 9/3/2007  
*     DCP 02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operations with Low Lake Anna Level,
*  
      10/24/2002
07-SE-ST-01, Special Test Procedure, 0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door
*     DCP 02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004
Test, 8/27/2007  
*     DCP 02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002
*  
*     DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close FP Dampers in Unit 1&2 Emergency
DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (associated with 99-SE-MOD-04)  
      Switchgear Rooms, 12/16/2004
*  
*     DCP 05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100 hr Core Offload, 10/6/2005
DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000  
*     DCP 05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-Scale Loop, 01/11/2006
*  
*     DCP 05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/2005
TSCR N-018, Eliminate Transmitter Response Time Testing Requirements, 9/11/2007  
*     DCP 05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard
      Breakers G1th% and G102, 02/07/2006
Screened Out Items - Modifications  
*     DCP 05-152, HV Motor Replacement, 1/26/06
*  
*     DCP 06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006
DCP 01-121, Safety Injection (SI) Accumulator Nozzle Replacement, 3/17/2001  
Screened Out Items - Item Equivalency Evaluation Review (Like for Like)
*  
*     IEER NOM00163-000, Mechanical Seal 01-SW-P-22A/B-Pump, Chesterton 180 Seal
DCP 01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005  
      Replacing Chesterton 123 Seal, 10/23/2006
*  
*     IEER 10000001417, Installation of Chesterton 180 Seal Replacing Chesterton 123 on
DCP 01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/2005  
      1-SW-P-22A/B, 5/7/2008
*  
*     IEER NEL00950-000, RCS Temperature Transmitter, 6/7/2006
DCP 02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operations with Low Lake Anna Level,
*     IEER NEL00984-000, Emergency Diesel Generator Battery, 11/29/2006
10/24/2002  
*     IEER NEL00961-000, Transient Event Recorder Power Supply - Replace Filter
*  
      Capacitor; Model 53D to Model 066151U400JS2, 05/09/2006
DCP 02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004  
*     IEER NEL01012-000, Circuit Breaker - Eaton Model, 4/20/2007
*  
*     IEER NVL 0009-002, 3 Globe Valve 1500#, 6/12/2006
DCP 02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002  
                                                                                Attachment
*  
DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close FP Dampers in Unit 1&2 Emergency
Switchgear Rooms, 12/16/2004  
*  
DCP 05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100 hr Core Offload, 10/6/2005  
*  
DCP 05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-Scale Loop, 01/11/2006  
*  
DCP 05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/2005  
*  
DCP 05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard
Breakers G1th% and G102, 02/07/2006  
*  
DCP 05-152, HV Motor Replacement, 1/26/06  
*  
DCP 06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006  
Screened Out Items - Item Equivalency Evaluation Review (Like for Like)  
*  
IEER NOM00163-000, Mechanical Seal 01-SW-P-22A/B-Pump, Chesterton 180 Seal
Replacing Chesterton 123 Seal, 10/23/2006
*  
IEER 10000001417, Installation of Chesterton 180 Seal Replacing Chesterton 123 on
1-SW-P-22A/B, 5/7/2008  
*  
IEER NEL00950-000, RCS Temperature Transmitter, 6/7/2006  
*  
IEER NEL00984-000, Emergency Diesel Generator Battery, 11/29/2006  
*  
IEER NEL00961-000, Transient Event Recorder Power Supply - Replace Filter  
Capacitor; Model 53D to Model 066151U400JS2, 05/09/2006  
*  
IEER NEL01012-000, Circuit Breaker - Eaton Model, 4/20/2007  
*  
IEER NVL 0009-002, 3 Globe Valve 1500#, 6/12/2006


                                              A-4
A-4  
*     IEER NVL 0175-000, 1/2 in. brass valve with Stainless Steel Trim, Air Operated valve,
      Powers Flowrite 593ss in lieu of 591-7971, 9/6/2006
Screened Out Items Procurement Technical Evaluation (Commercial Grade Dedication)
Attachment
*     PTE 000 NOM00020-A03, Pump W/Motor, Service Water Radiation Monitoring,
      01-SW-P-10, 4/18/2002
*  
*     PTE 42057909, 1 Inch brass relief valve for Control Room Chillers, 7/30/2007
IEER NVL 0175-000, 1/2 in. brass valve with Stainless Steel Trim, Air Operated valve,
Design Basis Documents
Powers Flowrite 593ss in lieu of 591-7971, 9/6/2006  
*     SDBD-NAPS-EA, North Anna Power Generation System, Revision 10
*     SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Fire Protection System North
Screened Out Items Procurement Technical Evaluation (Commercial Grade Dedication)
      Anna Power Station, Revision 9
*  
*     SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2007-06
PTE 000 NOM00020-A03, Pump W/Motor, Service Water Radiation Monitoring,
*     SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2008-01
01-SW-P-10, 4/18/2002  
*     SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Control Room Ventilation System
*  
      North Anna Power Station, Revision 8
PTE 42057909, 1 Inch brass relief valve for Control Room Chillers, 7/30/2007  
*     SDBD-NAPS-HC, DBD Change Request NHC-2005-03
Licensing Basis Documents
Design Basis Documents  
*     Technical Specifications, Current
*  
*     Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Current
SDBD-NAPS-EA, North Anna Power Generation System, Revision 10  
Corrective Actions
*  
*     N-2005-4372-R1, Initial Load Bank Testing on Inverter 2-IV Failed, 10/13/2005
SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Fire Protection System North
Procedures
Anna Power Station, Revision 9  
*     VPAP-3001, Safety and Regulatory Reviews, Revision 15
*  
*     DNAP-3004, Dominion Program for 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 - Changes,
SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2007-06  
      Tests, and Experiments, Revision2
*  
*     0-AP-10, Loss of Electrical Power, Revision 59
SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2008-01  
*     1-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 23
*  
*     2-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 21
SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Control Room Ventilation System
*     0-FS-CR-1, Control Room - Units 1 and 2 Safe Shutdown Equipment, Revision 0
North Anna Power Station, Revision 8  
*     1-OP-26.5, 120 V Vital Bus Distribution Revision 27
*  
*     0-FCA-1, Mitigation of Spurious Valve Operation, Revision 34
SDBD-NAPS-HC, DBD Change Request NHC-2005-03  
*     0-NAT-E-001, Revision 0, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Action Sheet, 10/13/2005
*     1-PT-138.3B, Combined Charging Pump 1B Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch
Licensing Basis Documents  
      Flow Verification, Revision 6 and Revision 8
*  
*     2-PT-138.AB, Combined Charging Pump 1A Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch
Technical Specifications, Current  
      Flow Verification, Revision 5
*  
*     0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door Test, Revision 0
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Current  
*     1-ICP-RC-L-1460, Revision 3, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration,
      9/13/2007
Corrective Actions  
*     NASES 6.20, Revision 1, Test Plan for DCP 01-162, 4/26/2005
*  
*     47241, Test Procedure for Seismic Testing of One DC Inverter, 5/20/2002
N-2005-4372-R1, Initial Load Bank Testing on Inverter 2-IV Failed, 10/13/2005  
                                                                                  Attachment
Procedures  
*  
VPAP-3001, Safety and Regulatory Reviews, Revision 15  
*  
DNAP-3004, Dominion Program for 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 - Changes,
Tests, and Experiments, Revision2  
*  
0-AP-10, Loss of Electrical Power, Revision 59  
*  
1-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 23  
*  
2-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 21  
*  
0-FS-CR-1, Control Room - Units 1 and 2 Safe Shutdown Equipment, Revision 0  
*  
1-OP-26.5, 120 V Vital Bus Distribution Revision 27  
*  
0-FCA-1, Mitigation of Spurious Valve Operation, Revision 34  
*  
0-NAT-E-001, Revision 0, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Action Sheet, 10/13/2005  
*  
1-PT-138.3B, Combined Charging Pump 1B Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch
Flow Verification, Revision 6 and Revision 8  
*  
2-PT-138.AB, Combined Charging Pump 1A Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch
Flow Verification, Revision 5  
*  
0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door Test, Revision 0  
*  
1-ICP-RC-L-1460, Revision 3, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration,
9/13/2007  
*  
NASES 6.20, Revision 1, Test Plan for DCP 01-162, 4/26/2005  
*  
47241, Test Procedure for Seismic Testing of One DC Inverter, 5/20/2002  


                                            A-5
A-5  
Work Orders
*     1-PT-31.8.2-779573-01, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration
Calculations
Attachment
*     131035-Z2-2, Low Pressure CO2 Hydraulic Calculations, Unit 2, Revision 1
Work Orders  
*     EE-0057, DC Equipment Sizing, Revision 1
*  
*     EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 0
1-PT-31.8.2-779573-01, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration  
*     EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 1
Calculations  
*     14258.79-E-4, Short Circuit Currents 120 V AC Vital Buses and Misc. Circuits-App. R
*  
      Evaluation, Revision 1
131035-Z2-2, Low Pressure CO2 Hydraulic Calculations, Unit 2, Revision 1  
*     ME-0491, Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System Analysis, Revision 0
*  
*     NE-0154, Minimum Quantity for Fire Protection Low Pressure CO2 Tanks 1-FP-TK-06
EE-0057, DC Equipment Sizing, Revision 1  
      and 1-FP-TK-5, Revision 002
*  
*     NE-0165, Volume Calculation of North Anna Fire Zones Protected by Low Pressure CO2
EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 0  
      Revision 000
*  
Drawings
EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 1  
*     N-04150-0-1FE12AR, Wiring Diagram - Emergency Switchgear Room - Halon 1301
*  
      Aux Relay & Abort / Lockout Panels - North Anna Power Station - Units 1 & 2, Revision
14258.79-E-4, Short Circuit Currents 120 V AC Vital Buses and Misc. Circuits-App. R
      0
Evaluation, Revision 1  
*     N-04150-0-1FP089, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 1 Emergency Switchgear
*  
      Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0
ME-0491, Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System Analysis, Revision 0  
*     N-04150-0-2FP041, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 2 Emergency Switchgear
*  
      Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0
NE-0154, Minimum Quantity for Fire Protection Low Pressure CO2 Tanks 1-FP-TK-06
*     N-051430101FE1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 0
and 1-FP-TK-5, Revision 002  
*     N-05143-1-FE1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 0
*  
*     N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-A, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision 0
NE-0165, Volume Calculation of North Anna Fire Zones Protected by Low Pressure CO2
*     N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-B, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision1
Revision 000  
*     11715-FE-1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 39
*     11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 11
Drawings  
*     11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 27
*  
*     11715-FH-32A, Treatment Lagoon Discharge Structure Dike III SH-1 North Anna Power
N-04150-0-1FE12AR, Wiring Diagram - Emergency Switchgear Room - Halon 1301
      Station, Revision 5
Aux Relay & Abort / Lockout Panels - North Anna Power Station - Units 1 & 2, Revision
*     NA-DW-6008D13, Loop #1 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0
0  
*     NA-DW-6008D49, Loop #2 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0
*  
*     NA-DW-6008D63, Loop #3 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0
N-04150-0-1FP089, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 1 Emergency Switchgear
Post Modification Testing
Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0
*     NASES 6.20 Attachment 2, Test Plan for DCP 05-112, Revision 1
*  
*     NASES 6.22 Attachment 2, Testing and Inspection of FW RTDs for DCP 05-112,
N-04150-0-2FP041, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 2 Emergency Switchgear
      Revision 0
Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0  
*     Testing Release for 1-RC-LR-1310A, 02/19/2007
*  
*     Testing Release for 2-RC-LR-2310A, 02/15/2007
N-051430101FE1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 0  
*     Testing Release for 1-LM-PR-110B, 02/13/2007
*  
*     Testing Release for 1-RH-TR-1604, 01/31/2007
N-05143-1-FE1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 0  
*     Testing Release for 2-FW-LR-2477, 01/31/2007
*  
*     Testing Release for 2-RH-TR-2604, 01/31/2007
N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-A, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision 0  
*     Testing Release for 1-LW-FR-104, 01/10/2007
*  
                                                                                  Attachment
N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-B, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision1  
*  
11715-FE-1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 39  
*  
11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 11  
*  
11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 27  
*  
11715-FH-32A, Treatment Lagoon Discharge Structure Dike III SH-1 North Anna Power
Station, Revision 5  
*  
NA-DW-6008D13, Loop #1 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0  
*  
NA-DW-6008D49, Loop #2 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0  
*  
NA-DW-6008D63, Loop #3 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0  
Post Modification Testing  
*  
NASES 6.20 Attachment 2, Test Plan for DCP 05-112, Revision 1
*  
NASES 6.22 Attachment 2, Testing and Inspection of FW RTDs for DCP 05-112,
Revision 0  
*  
Testing Release for 1-RC-LR-1310A, 02/19/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 2-RC-LR-2310A, 02/15/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 1-LM-PR-110B, 02/13/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 1-RH-TR-1604, 01/31/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 2-FW-LR-2477, 01/31/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 2-RH-TR-2604, 01/31/2007  
*  
Testing Release for 1-LW-FR-104, 01/10/2007  


                                            A-6
A-6  
*     Testing Release for 1-L0-XR-SGVRP, 01/31/2007
*     Testing Release for 2-LO-XR-SGVRP, 02/05/2007
*     Testing Release for 2-LM-PR-210B, 02/12/2007
Attachment
*     Testing Release for 1-HC-H2R-101-1, 02/22/2007
*  
*     Testing Release for 2-HC-H2R-201-2, 01/10/2007
Testing Release for 1-L0-XR-SGVRP, 01/31/2007  
*     Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2478, 02/26/2007
*  
*     Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2488, 02/26/2007
Testing Release for 2-LO-XR-SGVRP, 02/05/2007  
*     Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2498, 02/27/2007
*  
Calibration Data
Testing Release for 2-LM-PR-210B, 02/12/2007  
*     Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/02/2006
*  
*     Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 11/30/2005
Testing Release for 1-HC-H2R-101-1, 02/22/2007  
*     Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 01/02/2008
*  
*     Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/04/2007
Testing Release for 2-HC-H2R-201-2, 01/10/2007  
*     Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 12/01/2006
*  
Technical Reports
Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2478, 02/26/2007  
*     NE-1401, Rev. 0, Operational Impact of Framatome Fuel and use of the
*  
      CASMO/SIMULATE Code Package at North Anna, April 2, 2004
Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2488, 02/26/2007  
*     NE-1452, Rev. 0, Reload Safety Analysis Checklist North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE,
*  
      September 22, 2005
Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2498, 02/27/2007  
*     NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18
      Pattern MOE, April 2006
Calibration Data  
Engineering Transmittals
*  
*     ET-SE-99-086, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly
Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/02/2006  
      Ingersoll-Dresser serial Number NE012911-01 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2,
*  
      Revision 0
Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 11/30/2005  
*     ET-N-01-122, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly
*  
      Flowserve BR/Order 7029-2673 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2, Revision 0
Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 01/02/2008  
*     ET-N-02-068, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
*  
      2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0
Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/04/2007  
*     ET- N-03-0144, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
*  
      2-CH-P-1A - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0
Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 12/01/2006  
*     ET- N-04-0057, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
      2-CH-P-1C - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0
Technical Reports  
*     ET- N-05-0072, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
*  
      2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0
NE-1401, Rev. 0, Operational Impact of Framatome Fuel and use of the
*     ET-N-07-0049, Revision to North Anna Technical Specifications Bases to Eliminate
CASMO/SIMULATE Code Package at North Anna, April 2, 2004  
      Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Tests and Periodic Protection Channel
*  
      Response Time Tests, Revision 0
NE-1452, Rev. 0, Reload Safety Analysis Checklist North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE,
*     ET-N-07-0077, Evaluation of Low Pressure CO2 System Vendor Calculation and Blower
September 22, 2005  
      Test, Revision 1
*  
*     ET-N-07-0109, Estimating Water Flow Rate through Dike 3, Revision 0
NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18
                                                                                  Attachment
Pattern MOE, April 2006  
Engineering Transmittals  
*  
ET-SE-99-086, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly
Ingersoll-Dresser serial Number NE012911-01 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2,
Revision 0  
*  
ET-N-01-122, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly
Flowserve BR/Order 7029-2673 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2, Revision 0  
*  
ET-N-02-068, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0  
*  
ET- N-03-0144, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
2-CH-P-1A - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0  
*  
ET- N-04-0057, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump
2-CH-P-1C - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0  
*  
ET- N-05-0072, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump  
2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0  
*  
ET-N-07-0049, Revision to North Anna Technical Specifications Bases to Eliminate
Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Tests and Periodic Protection Channel  
Response Time Tests, Revision 0  
*  
ET-N-07-0077, Evaluation of Low Pressure CO2 System Vendor Calculation and Blower
Test, Revision 1  
*  
ET-N-07-0109, Estimating Water Flow Rate through Dike 3, Revision 0  


                                                A-7
A-7  
Vendor Manuals
*     59-W813-00006, Vendor Technical Manual for Weed Instrument RTD Temperature
      Sensors
Attachment
*     59-5984-00004, Component List For A Bill of Material, 3/20/02
Vendor Manuals  
Miscellaneous documents
*  
*     AREVA Letter FAB06-226, North Anna Advanced Mark-BW Top Nozzle Change
59-W813-00006, Vendor Technical Manual for Weed Instrument RTD Temperature
      Evaluation, March 29, 2006
Sensors  
*     Request for Engineering Assistance - Tracking No. R2003-128, 8/27/2003
*  
*     NCRODP-6, Fire Protection System, 5/2/2007
59-5984-00004, Component List For A Bill of Material, 3/20/02  
*     Procurement Engineering Inspection Plan 208, 4/18/2002
*     Purchase Order no. 45526645, 7/18/2007
*     O-MAT-E-001, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Sheet
Miscellaneous documents  
*     Short Circuit Simulation Results for G102-1 and G102-2
*  
*     NAP-0111, Specification for Vital Bus Static Inverters, Revision 0
AREVA Letter FAB06-226, North Anna Advanced Mark-BW Top Nozzle Change
*     CM-NA-FCI-0213, Enhanced Surveillance Program for Rosemount Transmitters IAW
Evaluation, March 29, 2006  
      CB 90-01: Loss of Oil-Fill in Transmitters Manufactured by Rosemount, Revison 0
*  
*     LBDCR N-018, TS Bases Change Eliminate Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time
Request for Engineering Assistance - Tracking No. R2003-128, 8/27/2003  
      Tests and Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests, Revision 0
*  
*     WCAP-14036-P-A, Elimination of Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests,
NCRODP-6, Fire Protection System, 5/2/2007  
      Revision 1
*  
Corrective Actions Written as a Result of this Inspection
Procurement Engineering Inspection Plan 208, 4/18/2002  
*     CR100465, Receipt Inspection Package contains typographical error, 6/3/2008
*  
Section 4OA5: Other Activities
Purchase Order no. 45526645, 7/18/2007  
Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166
*  
*     Procedure VPAP-0301, Design Change Process, Revision 26
O-MAT-E-001, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Sheet  
*     Procedure VPAP-0905, Insulation Control Program, Revision 4
*  
*     DNES-VA-MAT-1007, Protective Coating Requirements for procured Equipment to be
Short Circuit Simulation Results for G102-1 and G102-2  
      Installed Inside Containment, Revision 0
*  
*     Letter, VEPCO to USNRC, North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2, Supplemental
NAP-0111, Specification for Vital Bus Static Inverters, Revision 0  
      Response to NRC GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency
*  
      Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs, dated February 29, 2008
CM-NA-FCI-0213, Enhanced Surveillance Program for Rosemount Transmitters IAW
*     Letter, USNRC to VEPCO, Kewaunee Power Station, Millstone Power Station, Units 2
      and 3, North Anna Power Station Unit 1 and 2, Request for Extension of Completion
CB 90-01: Loss of Oil-Fill in Transmitters Manufactured by Rosemount, Revison 0  
      Dates for GL 2004-02 Corrective Actions, dated December 13, 2007
*  
*     Design Change Package DCP-06015, NRC GSI-191, RWST Level ESFAS Function to
LBDCR N-018, TS Bases Change Eliminate Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time
      Support Containment Sump Modification, 08/14/07
Tests and Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests, Revision 0  
*     Design Change Package DCP-07005, NRC GSI-191, Containment Sump Strainer
*  
      Interferences, 08/08/07
WCAP-14036-P-A, Elimination of Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests,
*     Design Change Package DCP-07129, NRC GSI-191, Piping Isulation Modifications,
Revision 1  
      08/08/07
                                                                                  Attachment
Corrective Actions Written as a Result of this Inspection  
*  
CR100465, Receipt Inspection Package contains typographical error, 6/3/2008  
Section 4OA5: Other Activities  
Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166
*  
Procedure VPAP-0301, Design Change Process, Revision 26  
*  
Procedure VPAP-0905, Insulation Control Program, Revision 4  
*  
DNES-VA-MAT-1007, Protective Coating Requirements for procured Equipment to be
Installed Inside Containment, Revision 0  
*  
Letter, VEPCO to USNRC, North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2, Supplemental
Response to NRC GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency  
Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs, dated February 29, 2008  
*  
Letter, USNRC to VEPCO, Kewaunee Power Station, Millstone Power Station, Units 2  
and 3, North Anna Power Station Unit 1 and 2, Request for Extension of Completion  
Dates for GL 2004-02 Corrective Actions, dated December 13, 2007  
*  
Design Change Package DCP-06015, NRC GSI-191, RWST Level ESFAS Function to
Support Containment Sump Modification, 08/14/07  
*  
Design Change Package DCP-07005, NRC GSI-191, Containment Sump Strainer
Interferences, 08/08/07  
*  
Design Change Package DCP-07129, NRC GSI-191, Piping Isulation Modifications,
08/08/07  


                                    A-8
A-8  
                            LIST OF ACRONYMS
ADAMS Agency-wide Document Access and Management System
CA     Corrective Action
Attachment
CAP   Corrective Action Program
LIST OF ACRONYMS  
CFR   Code of Federal Regulations
CR     Condition Report
EDG   Emergency Diesel Generator
ADAMS  
IMC   Inspection Manual Chapter
Agency-wide Document Access and Management System  
JPM   Job Performance Measures
CA  
LHSI   Low Head Safety Injection
NCV   Non-cited Violation
Corrective Action  
NRC   Nuclear Regulatory Commission
CAP  
OD     Operability Determination
PARS   Publicly Available Records
Corrective Action Program  
PI     Performance Indicator
CFR  
QS     Quench Spray
RCE   Root Cause Evaluation
Code of Federal Regulations  
RCP   Reactor Coolant Pump
CR  
RCS   Reactor Coolant System
RTP   Rated Thermal Power
Condition Report  
SDP   Significance Determination Process
EDG  
SR     Surveillance Requirements
TDAFWP Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump
Emergency Diesel Generator  
TS     Technical Specifications
IMC  
UFSAR  Updated Final Safety Analysis Report
URI   Unresolved Item
Inspection Manual Chapter  
VEPCO Virginia Electric and Power Company
JPM  
VPAP   Virginia Power Administrative Procedure
WO     Work Order
Job Performance Measures  
                                                        Attachment
LHSI
Low Head Safety Injection  
NCV  
Non-cited Violation  
NRC  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
OD  
Operability Determination  
PARS
Publicly Available Records  
PI  
Performance Indicator  
QS  
Quench Spray  
RCE  
Root Cause Evaluation  
RCP  
Reactor Coolant Pump  
RCS  
Reactor Coolant System  
RTP  
Rated Thermal Power  
SDP  
Significance Determination Process  
SR  
Surveillance Requirements
TDAFWP  
Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump  
TS  
Technical Specifications  
UFSAR   
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report  
URI  
Unresolved Item  
VEPCO  
Virginia Electric and Power Company  
VPAP
Virginia Power Administrative Procedure  
WO  
Work Order
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 15:25, 14 January 2025

IR 05000338-08-003, IR 05000339-08-003; 04/01/08 - 06/30/08; North Anna Power Station, Units 1 & 2, Routine Integrated Resident and Regional Report
ML082381091
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 08/25/2008
From: Bates M
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB5
To: Christian D
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
References
IR-08-003
Download: ML082381091 (26)


See also: IR 05000338/2008003

Text

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER

61 FORSYTH STREET, SW, SUITE 23T85

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8931

August 25, 2008

Mr. David A. Christian

President and Chief Nuclear Officer

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Innsbrook Technical Center

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA 23060

SUBJECT:

NORTH ANNA POWER STATION - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION

REPORT 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, AND 07200056/2008003

Dear Mr. Christian:

On June 30, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at

your North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection report

documents the inspection findings which were discussed on July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008 with

Mr. Daniel Stoddard, and on August 22, 2008 with other members of your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they related to safety and

compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your

licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and

interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, one self-revealing finding of very low safety significance

(Green) was identified which involved a violation of NRC requirements. Additionally, one

licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety significance is listed

in this report. NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with

Section VI.A.1 of the NRC Enforcement Policy because of the very low safety significance of the

violations and because they were entered into your corrective action program. If you contest

these non-cited violations, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this

inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.:

Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional

Administrator, Region II, the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the North Anna

Power Station.

VEPCO

2

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its

enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the

NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the

NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mark A. Bates, Acting Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 5

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos. 50-338, 50-339

License Nos. NPF-4, NPF-7

Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, and 07200056/2008003

w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/encl. (See next page)

___________________

OFFICE

RII:DRP

RII:DRP

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

RII:DRS

SIGNATURE

Non Concur

Non -Concur

/RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/ /RA By BDesai/

NAME

JReece

RClagg

RMoore

CPeabody

CEven

GGardner

KMiller

DATE

8/25/08

8/25/08

7/28/08

7/28/08

7/22/08

7/28/08

7/28/087/28/08

E-MAIL COPY? YES

NO YES NO YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

YES NO

OFFICE

RII:DRS

RII:DRP

RII:DRP

SIGNATURE

/RA/

/RA/

/RA/

NAME

JHelm

JDodson

JMoorman

DATE

8/25/08

8/25/08

E-MAIL COPY? YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO YES

NO

VEPCO

3

cc w/encl:

Chris L. Funderburk

Director

Nuclear Licensing and Operations Support

Virginia Electric and Power Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

D. G. Stoddard

Site Vice President

North Anna Power Station

Electronic Mail Distribution

Executive Vice President

Old Dominion Electric Cooperative

Electronic Mail Distribution

County Administrator

Louisa County

P.O. Box 160

Louisa, VA 23093

Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.

Senior Counsel

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

Millstone Power Station

Electronic Mail Distribution

Attorney General

Supreme Court Building

900 East Main Street

Richmond, VA 23219

Senior Resident Inspector

Virginia Electric and Power Company

North Anna Power Station

U.S. NRC

P.O. Box 490

Mineral, VA 23117

Eugene S. Grecheck

Vice President - Nuclear Development

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

Electronic Mail Distribution

Leslie N. Hartz

Vice President - Nuclear Support Services

Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

5000 Dominion Boulevard

Glen Allen, VA 23061

Eric Hendrixson

Director - Nuclear Safety and Licensing

Virginia Electric & Power Company

Electronic Mail Distribution

Michael M. Cline

Director

Virginia Department of Emergency

Services Management

Electronic Mail Distribution

VEPCO

4

Report to D. A. Christian from M. A. Bates dated August 25, 2008.

Distribution w/encl:

C. Evans, RII EICS (Part 72 Only)

L. Slack, RII EICS

OE Mail (email address if applicable)

RIDSNRRDIRS

PUBLIC

S. P. Lingam, NRR (PM: NA, SUR)

Richard Jervey, NRR

Enclosure

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

Docket Nos:

50-338, 50-339,72-056

License Nos:

NPF-4, NPF-7

Report No:

05000338/2008003, 05000339/2008003, 07200056/2008003

Licensee:

Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO)

Facility:

North Anna Power Station, Units 1 & 2

Location:

1022 Haley Drive

Mineral, Virginia 23117

Dates:

April 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008

Inspectors:

J. Reece, Senior Resident Inspector

R. Clagg, Resident Inspector

R. Moore, Senior Reactor Inspector, Section 4OA5.1

C. Peabody, Reactor Inspection, Section 1R17

C. Even, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17

G. Gardner, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17

K. Miller, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17

J. Helm, Reactor Inspector, Section 1R17

Approved by:

M. A. Bates, Acting Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 5

Division of Reactor Projects

CONTENTS

Summary of Plant Status...4

REACTOR SAFETY.......4

1R01

Adverse Weather Protection..4

1R04

Equipment Alignment..4

1R05

Fire Protection..5

1R11

Licensed Operator Requalification Program...6

1R12

Maintenance Effectiveness6

1R13

Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control....8

1R15

Operability Evaluations...9

1R17

Evaluations of Changes, Test, or Experiments and Permanent Plant

Modifications 9

1R19

Post-Maintenance Testing.. 12

1R22

Surveillance Testing 13

OTHER ACTIVITIES......13

4OA1

Performance Indicator Verification ... 13

4OA2

Identification and Resolution of Problems .. 14

4OA3

Event Followup.17

4OA5

Other Activities 18

4OA6

Meetings, Including Exit..20

4OA7

Licensee-Identified Violations.. 20

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Key Points of Contact.....A-1

List of Items Opened, Closed, and Discussed...A-1

List of Documents Reviewed.A-3

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000338/2008-003, 05000339/2008-003; 04/01/2008 - 06/30/2008; North Anna Power

Station, Units 1 and 2. Routine Integrated Resident and Regional Report.

The report covered a three month period of inspection by resident inspectors and reactor

inspectors from the region. One Green finding, which was a non-cited violation (NCV), was

Identified, and one licensee identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety

significance are listed in this report. The significance of most findings is identified by their color

(Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, Significance

Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or

be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for

overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-

1649, Reactor Oversight Process Revision 4, dated December, 2006.

A.

NRC Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

Green. A Green self-revealing non-cited violation of Technical Specification (TS)

5.4.1.a was identified for failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for

repair of the Unit 1 1H emergency diesel generator (EDG) air start check valves. The

licensee entered this problem into their corrective action program as condition report

098146, revised the procedure, and successfully completed repairs to the '1H' EDG.

The finding was more than minor because it directly impacted the mitigating systems

cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems

that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related

attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check

valves were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC 0609, Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance

(Green) because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification

deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train

being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant

due to possible external events. (Section 1R12)

B.

Licensee-Identified Violations.

Violations of very low safety significance, which were identified by the licensee have

been reviewed by the inspectors. Corrective actions taken or planned by the licensee

have been entered into the licensees corrective action program. These violations and

corrective actions are listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Plant Status

Unit 1 and 2 began the period at full Rated Thermal Power (RTP) and operated at or near full

RTP for the entire report period.

1.

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensees adverse weather preparations for hot weather

operations, specified in 0-GOP-4.1, Rev 23, 07/10/08, Hot Weather Operations, and

the licensees correction action data base for hot weather related issues. The

inspectors walked down the two risk-significant areas listed below to verify compliance

with the procedural requirements and to verify that the specified actions provided the

necessary protection for the structures, systems, or components.

Unit 1 & 2 auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump rooms;

Unit 1 & 2 quench spray (QS) pump rooms; and

Unit 1 outside recirculation spray (RS) and low head safety injection (LHSI)

pump room.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R04 Equipment Alignment

.1

Partial Walkdown

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted four equipment partial alignment walkdowns to evaluate the

operability of selected redundant trains or backup systems, listed below, with the other

train or system inoperable or out of service. The inspectors reviewed the functional

systems descriptions, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), system

operating procedures, and Technical Specifications (TS) to determine correct system

lineups for the current plant conditions. The inspectors performed walkdowns of the

systems to verify that critical components were properly aligned and to identify any

discrepancies which could affect operability of the redundant train or backup system.

5

Unit 2 '2J' Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) and support systems during

planned maintenance on '2H' EDG;

Unit 1 '1H' EDG during planned maintenance on '1J' EDG;

Unit 1 '1J' EDG and support systems during planned maintenance on '1H' EDG;

and,

Unit 1 'B' LHSI pump during planned maintenance on 'A' LHSI pump and related

valves.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.2

Complete Walkdown

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed a detailed walkdown and inspection of the Unit 1 'A' Train

outside RS system components external to containment to assess proper alignment and

to identify discrepancies that could impact its availability and functional capacity. The

inspectors assessed the physical condition and position of each recirculation spray and

casing cooling valve, whether manual, power operated or automatic to ensure correct

positioning of the valves. The inspection also included a review of the alignment and the

condition of support systems including fire protection, room ventilation, and emergency

lighting. Equipment deficiency tags were reviewed and the condition of the system was

discussed with the engineering personnel.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R05 Fire Protection

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted tours of the eight areas listed below that are important to

reactor safety to verify the licensees implementation of fire protection requirements as

described in Virginia Power Administrative Procedure VPAP-2401, Rev 28, 12/14/07,

Fire Protection Program. The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, conditions related

to: (1) licensee control of transient combustibles and ignition sources; (2) the material

condition, operational status, and operational lineup of fire protection systems,

equipment, and features; and (3) the fire barriers used to prevent fire damage or fire

propagation.

Emergency Diesel Generator 2H Unit 2 (fire zone 9A-2a / EDG-2H);

Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 1 (fire zone 6-1a / ESR-1);

Emergency Switchgear Room Unit 2 (fire zone 6-2a / ESR-2);

Emergency Diesel Generator 2J Unit 2 (fire zone 9B-2a / EDG-2J);

6

Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14B-1a /

MDAFW-1);

Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 1 (fire zone 14A-1a /

TDAFW-1)

Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14A-2a /

TDAFW-2); and,

Motor-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Unit 2 (fire zone 14B-2a /

MDAFW-2).

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed a crew examination that involved a reactor coolant system

(RCS) leak with a partial loss of annunciators, a loss of instrument air outside

containment, a failure of 1-RC-PT-1554 that fails open a pressurizer power operated

relief valve (PORV), and a rod ejection resulting in a small break loss of coolant accident

(LOCA). The inspectors observed crew performance in terms of communications; ability

to take timely and proper actions; prioritizing, interpreting, and verifying alarms; correct

use and implementation of procedures, including the alarm response procedures; timely

control board operation and manipulation, including high-risk operator actions; and

oversight and direction provided by the shift supervisor, including the ability to identify

and implement appropriate TS actions. The inspectors observed the post training

critique to determine that weaknesses or improvement areas revealed by the training

were captured by the instructor and reviewed with the operators.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness

a.

Inspection Scope

For the four equipment issues listed below, the inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of

the corresponding licensee's preventive and corrective maintenance. The inspectors

performed walkdowns of the accessible portions of the systems, performed in-office

reviews of procedures and evaluations, and held discussions with system engineers.

The inspectors compared the licensees actions with the requirements of the

Maintenance Rule (10 CFR 50.65) using ER-AA-MRL-10, Rev 2, 12/18/07,

Maintenance Rule Program, and Engineering Transmittal CEP-97-0018, Rev 12,

08/04/99, North Anna Maintenance Rule Scoping and Performance Criteria Matrix.

7

Condition report (CR) 099531, A MRule Evaluation was not assigned for

CR091536 and respective MRE006778, MRule Eval to Eng for 1-EE-BKR-1J1-

1-F2 contactor failed;

CR096110, 1A leak to B water box vacuum breakers, for maintenance issues

concerning Unit 2 Condenser Outlet Waterbox vacuum break;

CR098146, During maintenance run #8 air start check valve supply pipe to

header melted at fitting, and respective MRE006709, MRule; #8 Air Start

Ckvalve Supply Pipe to header melted at fitting;" and,

CR091169, "2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped," and respective MRE006467,

"MRule evaluation: 2-SW-P-1B Automatically tripped."

b.

Findings

Introduction: A self-revealing, Green, non-cited violation (NCV) of TS 5.4.1.a was

identified for the failure to adequately establish procedural requirements for repair of the

Unit 1 1H EDG air start check valves.

Description: On May 7, 2008, during a maintenance run of the '1H' EDG following

activities associated with a scheduled 80 hour9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> maintenance outage, the air start check

valve associated with the #8 cylinder stuck open. This allowed combustion gas into the

air start header, subsequently causing it to rupture due to heating of the soldered joints.

An evaluation by the licensee determined that the self-locking nut associated with the #8

cylinder air start check valve had disengaged from the threaded check valve shaft and

was oriented in such a way as to prevent the check valve from reseating. Further

evaluation by the licensee determined that the self locking nuts were consumable items

that were intended to be replaced with new self-locking nuts after each use. The

licensee determined that maintenance procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Rev 5, 05/12/06,

Repair of Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, was inadequate in that

it did not include guidance to treat the self locking nuts as consumable items. The

licensee revised maintenance procedure, 0-MCM-0701-14 and completed repairs to the

air start check valve and air start header. The licensee also conducted inspections of

the remaining air start check valves and returned the '1H' EDG to an operable status on

May 10, 2008.

Analysis: The inspectors determined that the failure to adequately establish procedural

requirements for repair of the 1H EDG air start check valves was a performance

deficiency. The finding was more than minor because it impacted the mitigating systems

cornerstone objective to ensure the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that

respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences, and the related

attribute of procedure quality in that the procedure failed to ensure air start check valves

were properly assembled following maintenance. The inspectors reviewed IMC 0609,

Appendix A, and determined that the finding was of very low safety significance (Green)

because it did not result in a loss of operability due to a design or qualification

deficiency, did not represent an actual loss of safety function, did not result in a train

being out of service longer than allowed by TS, and was not potentially risk significant

due to possible external events.

8

Enforcement: TS 5.4.1.a, requires, in part, that written procedures shall be established,

implemented and maintained covering the applicable procedures recommended in

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, Appendix A. Specifically, Section 9 requires, in part,

that maintenance that can affect the performance of safety-related equipment should be

properly performed in accordance with written procedures and documented instructions

appropriate to the circumstances. Licensee procedure O-MCM-0701-14, Repair of

Emergency Diesel Generator Air Start Check Valves, Rev 5, 05/12/06, contains

instructions for rebuilding EDG air start check valves. Contrary to this, the licensee

failed to adequately establish appropriate procedural requirements in 0-MCM-0701-14 in

that the procedure did not contain instructions to replace the consumable, self-locking

nuts for the air start check valves. Because the finding is of very low safety significance

and because it has been entered into the licensees corrective action program (CAP) as

CR098146, this violation is being treated as an NCV, consistent with Section VI.A.1 of

the NRC Enforcement Policy: NCV 05000338/2008003-01, Failure to Adequately

Establish Procedural Requirements for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H'

EDG.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated, as appropriate, the four activities listed below for the following:

(1) effectiveness of the risk assessments performed before maintenance activities were

conducted; (2) management of risk; (3) upon identification of an unforeseen situation,

necessary steps were taken to plan and control the resulting emergent work activities;

and (4) maintenance risk assessments and emergent work problems were adequately

identified and resolved. The inspectors verified that the licensee was complying with the

requirements of 10 CFR 50.65 (a)(4) and the data output from the licensees safety

monitor associated with the risk profile of Units 1 and 2.

Emergent work on 1H EDG due to #8 cylinder air start check valve failure

resulting in the extension of a maintenance outage, but overall risk remained

Green;

Emergent work for instrument air leak to 'B' water box vacuum breakers; overall

risk remained Green;

Emergent entry into 0-AP-41, Rev 39, 06/06/08, Severe Weather Conditions,

due to a tornado watch which when combined with other unavailable equipment

resulted in a yellow risk condition;

Emergent work due to failure of '1H' EDG battery charger; overall risk remained

Green.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

9

1R15 Operability Evaluations

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed six operability evaluations affecting the risk-significant

mitigating system, listed below, to assess, as appropriate: (1) the technical adequacy of

the evaluations; (2) whether continued system operability was warranted; (3) whether

other existing degraded conditions were considered as compensating measures; (4)

whether the compensatory measures, if involved, were in place, would work as intended,

and were appropriately controlled; and (5) where continued operability was considered

unjustified, the impact on TS Limiting Conditions for Operation and the risk significance

in accordance with the Significance Determination Process (SDP). The inspectors

review included a verification that determinations of operability were made as specified

by procedure VPAP-1408, Rev 4, 05/28/08, System Operability.

CR093429, review of OD000158, Evaluate leak by of terry turbine steam supply

valve;

CR092489, review of OD000154, Deflected Control Rods on 2-SW-REJ-24E;

CR092894, review of OD000156, Evaluate wall thickness;

CR091976, review of OD000152, Perform OD for required actions on battery

chargers, relative to EDGs during high winds and cold ambient conditions;

CR098251, 1H EDG air stop check valve supply fitting failure - common cause

failure review; and,

CR091896, review of OD000151, #1 seal o-rings installed in 1-B RCP exceeded

6 year life on o-rings.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R17 Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed selected samples of evaluations to confirm that the licensee

had appropriately considered the conditions under which changes to the facility, UFSAR,

or procedures may be made, and tests conducted, without prior NRC approval. The

inspectors reviewed evaluations for eight changes and additional information, such as

drawings, calculations, supporting analyses, the UFSAR, and TS to confirm that the

licensee had appropriately concluded that the changes could be accomplished without

obtaining a license amendment. The eight evaluations reviewed are listed in the

Attachment to this report.

The inspectors reviewed samples of changes for which the licensee had determined that

evaluations were not required, to confirm that the licensees conclusions to screen out

these changes were correct and consistent with 10 CFR 50.59. The twenty-three

screened out changes reviewed are listed in the Attachment to this report.

10

The inspectors evaluated engineering design change packages (DCPs) for fourteen

material and design based modifications to evaluate the modifications for adverse

effects on system availability, reliability, and functional capability. The fourteen

modifications and the associated attributes reviewed are as follows:

DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (Barrier Integrity)

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Structural

- Licensing Basis

- Failure Modes

DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000 (Mitigating Systems)

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Failure Modes

- Licensing Basis

- Operations

DCP-01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005 (Mitigating

Systems)

- Energy Needs

- Control Signals

- Operations

- Licensing Basis

DCP-01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/05, (Mitigating

Systems)

- Energy Needs

- Material/Replacement Components

- Operations

- Structural

- Licensing Basis

DCP-02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operation with Low Lake Anna Level,

10/24/2002 (Mitigating Systems)

- Process Medium

- Operations

DCP-02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004 (Mitigating Systems)

- Operations

- Licensing Basis

- Structural

DCP-02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002

- Energy Needs

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Structural

11

DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close Fire Protection Dampers in Unit 1&2

Emergency Switchgear Rooms, 1/13/05 (Mitigating Systems)

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Energy Needs

- Operations

DCP-05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100-hour Core Offload, 10/6/2005

(Barrier Integrity, Mitigating Systems)

- Heat Removal

- Licensing Basis

DCP-05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-scale Loop, 01/11/2006

(Mitigating Systems)

- Energy Needs

- Control Signals

- Process Medium

- Licensing Basis

DCP-05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/05, (Initiating Events)

- Control Signals

- Licensing Basis

- Failure Modes

DCP-05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard

Breakers G1TH5 and G102, 02/07/2006 (Mitigating Systems)

- Energy Needs

- Timing

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Licensing Basis

DCP-06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006 (Mitigating Systems)

- Energy Needs

- Process Medium

- Licensing Basis

DCP-07-155, CO2 Fire Protection System Design Zone 2-2 Nozzle Replacement

(Mitigating Systems)

- Materials/Replacement Components

- Energy Needs

- Equipment Protection

- Operations

- Licensing Basis

Documents reviewed included procedures, engineering calculations, modification design

and implementation packages, work orders, site drawings, corrective action documents,

applicable sections of the updated UFSAR, supporting analyses, Technical

Specifications, and design basis information. The inspectors additionally reviewed test

documentation to ensure adequacy in scope and conclusion. The inspectors verified

12

that all changes were incorporated in licensing and design basis documents and

associated plant procedures.

The inspectors also reviewed selected corrective action documents and the licensees

recent self-assessments associated with modifications and 10 CFR 50.59 screening /

evaluation issues to verify that problems were identified at an appropriate threshold,

were entered into the corrective action process, and appropriate corrective actions had

been initiated and tracked to completion.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R19 Post Maintenance Testing

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed six post maintenance test procedures and/or test activities, as

appropriate, for selected risk-significant mitigating systems to assess whether: (1) the

effect of testing on the plant had been adequately addressed by control room and/or

engineering personnel; (2) testing was adequate for the maintenance performed; (3)

acceptance criteria were clear and adequately demonstrated operational readiness

consistent with design and licensing basis documents; (4) test instrumentation had

current calibrations, range, and accuracy consistent with the application; (5) test were

performed as written with applicable prerequisites satisfied; (6) jumpers installed or

leads lifted were properly controlled; (7) test equipment was removed following testing;

and (8) equipment was returned to the status required to perform in accordance with

licensee procedure VPAP-2003, Rev 12, 05/01/07, Post Maintenance Testing

Program.

WO 00798652-01, Obtain samples per engineering 3A Heat and Vent Exhaust

Filter Bank;

WO 00767749-01, Replace pump/motor assembly;

WO 00804803-01 & 01A, Clean contacts on K1 relay;

WO 00801938, Unit 2 2-SW-P-1A uncouple, couple replace seal;

WO 00782951, Unit 2 1C Charging Pump Lube Flex Couplings - Clean Lube Oil

Coolers; and,

WO 00790617-01, Replace MOT on 1J EDG.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

13

1R22 Surveillance Testing

a.

Inspection Scope

For the eight surveillance tests listed below, the inspectors examined the test procedure,

witnessed testing, reviewed test records and data packages, to determine whether the

scope of testing adequately demonstrated that the affected equipment was functional

and operable, and that the surveillance requirements of TS were met. The inspectors

also determined whether the testing effectively demonstrated that the systems or

components were operationally ready and capable of performing their intended safety

functions. The inspectors reviewed four in-service testing activities for a risk significant

pump or valve as part of the surveillance activities.

In-Service Test:

1-PT-63.1A.2, Quench Spray System - A Subsystem Comprehensive Pump

Test, Revision 12;

2-PT-213.7B, Valve Inservice Inspection (B Train of Recirc Spray System),

Revision 12;

2-PT-64.4B.2, Casing Cooling Pump (2-RS-P-3B) Biennial IST Comprehensive

Pump Test, Revision 3;

1-PT-71.3Q.1, 1-FW-P-3B, B Motor-Driven AFW Pump IST Comprehensive

Pump Test and Valve Testing, Revision 3;

2-PT-75.2B, Service Water Pump (2-SW-P-1B) Quarterly Test, Revision 48;

and,

2-PT-14.1, Charging Pump 2-CH-P-1A, Revision 44.

Other Surveillance Tests:

2-PT-33.10, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant

Pump Bus 2A Underfrequency, Revision 9; and,

2-PT-33.7, Reactor Trip System Channel Operational Test for Reactor Coolant

Pump Bus 2A Undervoltage, Revision 10.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensees procedures for developing the data for the

Barrier Integrity PI which are: (1) RCS Specific Activity; and (2) RCS Leakage. The

inspectors examined data reported to the NRC for the period April 2007 through March

14

2008. Procedural guidance for reporting PI information and records used by the

licensee to identify potential PI occurrences were also reviewed for both units. The

inspectors reviewed the licensee event reports, corrective action program documents,

and maintenance rules records as part of the verification process. The inspection was

conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, Performance Indicator

Verification. The applicable planning standards, 10 CFR 50.0 and NEI 99-02,

Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, were used as reference

criteria.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems

.1

Review of items Entered into the Corrective Action Program:

As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,

and in order to help identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance

issues for follow-up, the inspectors performed a daily screening of items entered into the

licensees CAP. This review was accomplished by reviewing daily CR report summaries

and periodically attending daily CR Review Team meetings.

.2

Semi-Annual Review to Identify Trends

a.

Inspection Scope

As required by Inspection Procedure 71152, Identification and Resolution of Problems,

the inspectors performed a review of the licensees corrective action program and

associated documents to identify trends that could indicate the existence of a more

significant safety issue. The inspectors review was focused on repetitive equipment and

corrective maintenance issues but also considered the results of daily inspector

corrective action program item screening. The review also included issues documented

outside the normal correction action program in system health reports, corrective

maintenance works orders, component status reports, site monthly meeting reports and

maintenance rule assessments. The inspectors review nominally considered the six-

month period of January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008. The inspectors compared and

contrasted their results with the results contained in the licensees latest integrated

quarterly assessment report. Corrective actions associated with a sample of the issues

identified in the licensees trend report were reviewed for adequacy.

b.

Assessments and Observations

No findings of significance were identified. In general, the licensee has identified trends

and has appropriately addressed the trends with their CAP. However, the inspectors

identified an adverse trend in the completion quality of safety-related work order

packages which may contain procedures used for performing maintenance or post-

maintenance tests (PMT). Specifically, the following deficiencies are indicated below:

15

WO 00787908-01: NRC identified incomplete foreign material exclusion (FME)

checklist; incorrect date, incorrect step completion.

WO 00796258-01: NRC identified no radiation work permit identified; incomplete

FME checklist, incorrect dates; incorrect step completion.

WO 00801525-01: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was

not performed.

WO 00801935-01: NRC identified missing signatures for work completion.

WO 00797498-01: Licensee identified missing FME checklist; missing Lift/Land

Lead sheet.

WO 00767749-01: NRC identified missing page of FME checklist; incorrect step

completion.

WO 00783887-02: NRC identified that PMT for motor heater operability test was

not performed.

WO 00790617-01: NRC identified missing FME checklist.

The licensee acknowledged the identified trend and entered all of the above

discrepancies into their CAP for appropriate corrective action.

.3

Annual Samples

CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings Installed on 1-B-RCP

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensees assessments and corrective actions for

CR091896, #1 Seal O-rings installed in 1-B RCP seal reach the end of qualified life.

The condition report was reviewed to ensure that the full extent of the issue was

identified, an appropriate evaluation was performed, and appropriate corrective actions

were specified and prioritized. The inspectors also evaluated the CR against the

requirements of the licensees CAP as specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2,

05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified. On February 2, 2008, Unit 2 was removed

from service because of degrading seal performance on the A RCP. During the

licensees root cause evaluation, RCE000219, a procedural error was discovered in

preventative maintenance procedure for RCP seals, 0-MPM-0110-01, Rev 19, 03/06/06,

Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Injection, that involved replacement of the #1 seal high

temperature o-rings. Specifically, the procedure states that the applicable o-ring service

history and current leak data must be reviewed, and if the o-rings have been installed

greater than 9 years or the #1 seal leak rate changes by greater than 0.3 gallons per

minute, then component engineering must perform an evaluation to determine

requirements for inspection or seal replacement. However, the seal vendor technical

manual recommends replacement of the #1 seal ring and runner o-rings every 45,000

hours of operation or 6 years. The licensee reviewed seal replacement history for both

16

units and determined that the Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal high temperature o-rings were

installed in October, 2001, but were not replaced during a subsequent refueling outage

in 2007. The licensee initiated CR091896 for corrective action and performed an

apparent cause evaluation, ACE013661, which determined a cause category of

inadequate written instructions.

The inspectors reviewed ACE013661 and verified the cause and related corrective

actions. The inspectors also noted and reviewed compensatory measures, described

below, initiated by the licensee due to the potential impact of a seal failure on the

licensees 10 CFR 50, Appendix R analysis.

Initiate trending of Unit 2 B RCP #1 seal parameters for indications of degrading

performance.

Establish a twice per shift fire watch in the auxiliary building areas involving the

charging pumps, component cooling (CC) pumps and respective power supply

cables to reduce the risk of an fire resulting in a loss of normal and backup seal

cooling.

Establish zones prohibiting transient combustibles within 20 feet of Unit 1

charging pump power cables and reschedule any hot work involving

components in the areas of the charging pumps, CC pumps and respective

power cables. This protects the unit charging cross-tie function.

The inspectors will continue to monitor the licensees compensatory actions. The

inspectors also verified initiation of WO 00802328-01 to replace all o-rings in the Unit 2

B RCP #1 seal and actions to correct 0-MPM-0110-01.

CR094772, 2H EDG Oil Leakage Increasing and CR101714, Technical Specification

Violation for Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable for Greater Than Allowed Completion

Time

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed CR094772, "2H diesel oil leakage increasing," and related CRs

to ensure that the full extent of the issue was identified, an appropriate evaluation was

performed, and appropriate corrective actions were specified and prioritized. The

inspectors also evaluated the CR against the requirements of the licensees CAP as

specified in procedure, PI-AA-200, Rev 2, 05/06/08, "Corrective Action Program," and

10 CFR 50, Appendix B.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified. On April 5, 2008, the licensee identified

increasing oil leakage on the '2H' EDG exhaust manifolds and performed an air roll of

the EDG which indicated the cylinders had excessive oil accumulation. The licensee

subsequently determined that the wrong size impeller had been installed in the standby

lube oil pump during a maintenance outage that occurred from March 24, 2008, through

March 29, 2008. The enforcement aspects are discussed in section 4OA7 of this report.

When the licensee declared '2H' EDG inoperable, they also declared the Unit 2 A SW

17

pump inoperable on April 5, 2008, in accordance with TS 3.8.1, due to inoperability of

the Unit 1 B SW pump, which was removed from service on April 1, 2008, and entered

a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> LCO under TS 3.7.8. The Unit 1 B SW pump was subsequently returned to

service on April 6, 2008, and 2H EDG was returned to service on April 9, 2008. The

inspectors determined that the licensee correctly implemented Technical Specifications

from the time the service water pumps and EDG were declared inoperable; therefore,

there was no performance deficiency.

The inspectors reviewed the completed root cause evaluation, RCE000225, and related

documents including the licensees probabilistic risk analysis. The inspectors

determined that the installation of the incorrect impeller affected the EDG operability,

which also affected the operability of the associated service water pump. The inspectors

noted that although the Unit 2 A SW pump was technically inoperable, it remained

available based on the availability of its normal power supply. The licensee entered this

problem into their CAP as CR101714 and submitted Licensee Event Report 05000338,

339/2008-001-00 to document the problem.

4OA3 Event Followup

.1

(Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000339/2007-004-00 and Revised LER

05000339/2007-004-01: Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow with

Power Greater Than 30 Percent

On December 25, 2007, at 2110 hours0.0244 days <br />0.586 hours <br />0.00349 weeks <br />8.02855e-4 months <br />, with Unit 2 at approximately full rated thermal

power an automatic reactor trip occurred due to loss of coolant flow in the B loop. The

cause was determined to be a trip of the B RCP motor due to actuation of the neutral

over current protection relay. The licensee installed a spare motor in order to return the

unit to service. The licensee documented the corrective actions associated with this

event in CR027748. The inspectors reviewed the LER and related cause evaluations.

This LER is closed.

.2

(Closed) LER 05000338, 339/2008-001-00: Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable

Greater Than Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time.

On April 1, 2008, the Unit 1 B SW pump was removed from service for motor

maintenance. On April 5, 2008, the Unit 2 2H EDG was declared inoperable due to

excessive oil leakage from the exhaust manifolds. In compliance with TS, inoperability

of the 2H EDG also rendered the Unit 2 A SW pump inoperable resulting in a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />

LCO per TS 3.7.8 for the SW system. Subsequently, the cause of the 2H EDG

inoperability was identified as an incorrect impeller installed in the associated standby

lube oil pump during a maintenance outage for the 2H EDG from March 24 through

March 29, 2008. Consequently, the two SW pumps were inoperable for greater than the

TS allowed completion time. The inspectors completed a review of the LER and related

corrective action documents.

18

4OA5 Other Activities

.1

(Closed) Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166, Pressurized Water reactor Containment

Sump Blockage (NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2

a.

Inspection Scope

The inspector reviewed the status of the implementation of the licensees actions in

response to Generic Letter (GL) 2004-02, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on

Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors,

for Units 1 and 2. The onsite inspections which verified the installation of modifications

were performed in April and October of 2007 (NRC Report Nos.: 50-338,339/2007003

and 50-338,339/2007005). The licensees GL 2004-02 commitments which were

incomplete at the time of the on-site inspections included chemical effects and

downstream effects analyses to support the installed strainer design and program

changes to assure the assumptions of the GL 2004-02 /GSI-191 design basis

assumptions remained valid. The inspector requested information to review the status of

the incomplete commitment items and performed an in-office review during the week of

May 5-9, 2008, to verify completion of the outstanding commitment items.

The inspector reviewed the licensee design and licensing documentation to verify that

the GL 2004-02 modifications and program changes were complete and to determine

the status of GL 2004-02 commitments which were not completed during the previous

onsite inspections

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified. Plant physical modifications and program

changes identified in the licensees initial and supplemental responses to GL 2004-02

were complete.

The chemical effects and downstream analyses were not complete. A completion date

extension for these analyses was granted until May 31, 2008 (USNRC letter to VEPCO,

dated 12/13/07). The licensee requested additional extension to September 30, 2008

(Dominion letter to USNRC, dated May 22, 2008). Any additional plant changes

identified as a result of these analyses will be reviewed via the routine design control

inspection activity implemented by the existing reactor oversight program.

A violation was identified and documented in a previous NRC inspection report related to

implementation of the GL 2004-02 strainer modification, NCV 05000339/2008002-04,

Inadequate Design Control Involving Unit 2 Containment Sump Strainer Gaps.

This documentation of TI-2515/166 completion as well as any results of sampling audits

of licensee actions will be reviewed by the NRC staff (Office of Nuclear Reactor

Regulation - NRR) as input along with the GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris

Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized-

Water Reactors responses to support closure of GL 2004-02 and Generic Safety Issue

(GSI)-191 Assessment of Debris Accumulation on Pressurized-Water Reactor (PWR)

19

Sump Performance." The NRC will notify each licensee by letter of the results of the

overall assessment as to whether GSI-191 and GL 2004-02 have been satisfactorily

addressed at that licensees plant(s). Completion of TI-2515/166 does not necessarily

indicate that a licensee has finished all testing and analyses needed to demonstrate the

adequacy of their modifications and procedure changes. Licensees may also have

obtained approval of plant-specific extensions that allow for later implementation of plant

modifications. Licensees will confirm completion of all corrective actions to the NRC.

The NRC will track all such yet-to-be-performed items identified in the TI-2515/166

inspection reports to completion and may choose to inspect implementation of some or

all of them.

.2

Quarterly Resident Inspector Observations of Security Personnel and Activities

a.

Inspection Scope

During the inspection period, the inspectors conducted observations of security force

personnel and activities to ensure that the activities were consistent with the licensee

security procedures and regulatory requirements relating to nuclear plant security.

These observations took place during both normal and off-normal plant working hours.

These quarterly resident inspector observations of security force personnel and activities

did not constitute additional inspection samples. They were considered an integral part

of the inspectors normal plant status review.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

.3

Review of the Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

(Inspection Procedure 60855.1)

a.

Inspection Scope

Inspectors reviewed the normal operations of the ISFSI. The inspectors walked down

the ISFSI pad to assess the material condition of the casks, the installation of security

equipment, and the performance of the monitoring systems. In preparation for an

upcoming cask load involving the NUHOMS design the inspectors reviewed licensee

cask loading and handling procedures and reviewed previous cask loading and ISFSI

related plant issues and corrective actions status. Additionally, the inspectors observed

cask loading during the week of June 2, 2008, to verify that work was performed in

accordance with approved procedures and that loaded fuel assemblies were identified

and recorded in a controlled document.

b.

Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

20

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

.1

Exit Meeting Summary

On July 9, 2008 and July 30, 2008, the senior resident inspector presented the

inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Dan Stoddard and

other members of the staff. The licensee acknowledged the findings. The inspectors

asked the licensee whether any of the material examined during the inspection should

be considered proprietary. No proprietary information was identified.

On August 22, 2008, the Acting Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 5 presented the revised

inspection results for the routine integrated quarterly report to Mr. Page Kemp.

.2

Temporary Instruction 2515/166 Exit Meeting

An interim meeting was conducted via telephone on May 27, 2008 with Mr. P. Kemp.

.3

10 CFR 50.59, Modifications Exit Meeting

An interim exit meeting with licensee management and staff was conducted on June 4,

2008, to discuss the results of this inspection. Proprietary information, reviewed by the

team as part of routine inspection activities, was returned to the licensee in accordance

with prescribed controls.

4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations

The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the

licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of Section VI of

the NRC Enforcement Policy, NUREG-1600 for characterization as a NCV:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires in part that activities affecting quality

shall be prescribed and accomplished by documented instructions of a type

appropriate to the circumstances. Contrary to this, on April 5, 2008, the instructions

involving a part number for a pump impeller in a work order to repair the standby

lube oil pump were incorrectly prescribed and accomplished. This issue is in the

licensees CAP as CR094772 (4OA3).

ATTACHMENT: SUPPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Attachment

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel:

V. Armentrout, SG Programs, ISI Corporate

J. Bailey, Manager Vendor Quality

J. Breeden, Supervisor, Radioactive Analysis and Material Control

W. Corbin, Director, Nuclear Engineering

R. Evans, Manager, Radiological Protection and Chemistry

R. Foster, Supply Chain Manager

E. Hendrixson, Director, Nuclear Safety and Licensing

S. Hughes, Manager, Nuclear Operations

P. Kemp, Supervisor, Station Licensing

J. Kirkpatrick, Manager, Nuclear Maintenance

L. Lane, Plant Manager

G. Lear, Manager, Organizational Effectiveness

J. Leberstien, Licensing Technical Consultant

T. Maddy, Manager, Nuclear Protection Services

M. Main, Component Engineer

G. Marshall, Manager, Nuclear Outage and Planning

C. McClain, Manager, Nuclear Training

J. McHale, Engineering Supervisor

F. Mladen, Manager, Nuclear Site Services

B. Morrison, Supervisor Nuclear Engineering

J. Rayman, Nuclear Emergency Preparedness

J. Scott, Supervisor, Nuclear Training (operations)

D. Stoddard, Site Vice President

R. Williams, Component Engineer

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED

Opened and Closed 05000338/2008003-01

NCV

Failure to Adequately Establish Procedural Requirements

for Air Start Check Valve Maintenance for the '1H' EDG

(1R12)

Closed

2515/166

TI

Pressurized Water Reactor Containment Sump Blockage

(NRC Generic Letter 2004-02) Units 1 & 2 (Section

4OA5.1)

A-2

Attachment

05000339/2007-004-00

LER

Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With

Power Greater Than 30 Percent

05000339/2007-004-01

LER

Automatic Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Coolant Flow With

Power Greater Than 30 Percent (Revised)

05000338, 339/2008-001-00 LER

Two Service Water Pumps Inoperable Greater Than

Technical Specification Allowed Completion Time

Discussed

None

A-3

Attachment

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1R17: Evaluations of Changes, Tests, or Experiments and Permanent Plant

Modifications

Full Evaluations

99-SE-MOD-04, Fuel Assembly Repair 4/15/1999

06-SE-MOD-01, Abandonment of Incore Thermocouples, 3/29/2006

06-SE-OT-01, Reload Safety Evaluation, 3/31/2006

06-SE-OT-02, Technical Report NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety

Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE, 3/31/2006

07-SE-OT-01, Reduced Recirculation Spray Pump Flowrates, 9/3/2007

07-SE-ST-01, Special Test Procedure, 0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door

Test, 8/27/2007

DCP-99-003, Fuel Assembly Repair, 4/15/1999 (associated with 99-SE-MOD-04)

DCP-99-169, Charging Pump Upgrades, 1/27/2000

TSCR N-018, Eliminate Transmitter Response Time Testing Requirements, 9/11/2007

Screened Out Items - Modifications

DCP 01-121, Safety Injection (SI) Accumulator Nozzle Replacement, 3/17/2001

DCP 01-160, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 1-III & 1-IV, 12/02/2005

DCP 01-162, Replacement of Vital Bus Inverters 2-III and 2-IV, 4/28/2005

DCP 02-015, Pump Modifications to Support Operations with Low Lake Anna Level,

10/24/2002

DCP 02-016, Revision to Lake Anna Minimum Level, 3/24/2004

DCP 02-161, Emergency Diesel Fuel Oil Drain Header Replacement, 10/2/2002

DCP 04-150, Install Manual Switch to Close FP Dampers in Unit 1&2 Emergency

Switchgear Rooms, 12/16/2004

DCP 05-007, Design Basis for North Anna Spent Fuel 100 hr Core Offload, 10/6/2005

DCP 05-112, Replace FW Temperature RTDs and Re-Scale Loop, 01/11/2006

DCP 05-117, Removal of Spare 7300 Process Cards, 6/1/2005

DCP 05-143, Relocation of Switchyard Breaker H502, and Replacement of Switchyard

Breakers G1th% and G102, 02/07/2006

DCP 05-152, HV Motor Replacement, 1/26/06

DCP 06-138, Control Room Recorder Replacement, 12/14/2006

Screened Out Items - Item Equivalency Evaluation Review (Like for Like)

IEER NOM00163-000, Mechanical Seal 01-SW-P-22A/B-Pump, Chesterton 180 Seal

Replacing Chesterton 123 Seal, 10/23/2006

IEER 10000001417, Installation of Chesterton 180 Seal Replacing Chesterton 123 on

1-SW-P-22A/B, 5/7/2008

IEER NEL00950-000, RCS Temperature Transmitter, 6/7/2006

IEER NEL00984-000, Emergency Diesel Generator Battery, 11/29/2006

IEER NEL00961-000, Transient Event Recorder Power Supply - Replace Filter

Capacitor; Model 53D to Model 066151U400JS2, 05/09/2006

IEER NEL01012-000, Circuit Breaker - Eaton Model, 4/20/2007

IEER NVL 0009-002, 3 Globe Valve 1500#, 6/12/2006

A-4

Attachment

IEER NVL 0175-000, 1/2 in. brass valve with Stainless Steel Trim, Air Operated valve,

Powers Flowrite 593ss in lieu of 591-7971, 9/6/2006

Screened Out Items Procurement Technical Evaluation (Commercial Grade Dedication)

PTE 000 NOM00020-A03, Pump W/Motor, Service Water Radiation Monitoring,

01-SW-P-10, 4/18/2002

PTE 42057909, 1 Inch brass relief valve for Control Room Chillers, 7/30/2007

Design Basis Documents

SDBD-NAPS-EA, North Anna Power Generation System, Revision 10

SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Fire Protection System North

Anna Power Station, Revision 9

SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2007-06

SDBD-NAPS-FP, DBD Change Request NFP-2008-01

SDBD-NAPS-FP, System Design Basis Document for Control Room Ventilation System

North Anna Power Station, Revision 8

SDBD-NAPS-HC, DBD Change Request NHC-2005-03

Licensing Basis Documents

Technical Specifications, Current

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Current

Corrective Actions

N-2005-4372-R1, Initial Load Bank Testing on Inverter 2-IV Failed, 10/13/2005

Procedures

VPAP-3001, Safety and Regulatory Reviews, Revision 15

DNAP-3004, Dominion Program for 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 - Changes,

Tests, and Experiments, Revision2

0-AP-10, Loss of Electrical Power, Revision 59

1-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 23

2-AP-20, Operation From the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Revision 21

0-FS-CR-1, Control Room - Units 1 and 2 Safe Shutdown Equipment, Revision 0

1-OP-26.5, 120 V Vital Bus Distribution Revision 27

0-FCA-1, Mitigation of Spurious Valve Operation, Revision 34

0-NAT-E-001, Revision 0, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Action Sheet, 10/13/2005

1-PT-138.3B, Combined Charging Pump 1B Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch

Flow Verification, Revision 6 and Revision 8

2-PT-138.AB, Combined Charging Pump 1A Head curve Verification and HHSI Branch

Flow Verification, Revision 5

0-ST-FP-001, Low Pressure CO2 Blower Door Test, Revision 0

1-ICP-RC-L-1460, Revision 3, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration,

9/13/2007

NASES 6.20, Revision 1, Test Plan for DCP 01-162, 4/26/2005

47241, Test Procedure for Seismic Testing of One DC Inverter, 5/20/2002

A-5

Attachment

Work Orders

1-PT-31.8.2-779573-01, Pressurizer Level Protection Channel II Calibration

Calculations

131035-Z2-2, Low Pressure CO2 Hydraulic Calculations, Unit 2, Revision 1

EE-0057, DC Equipment Sizing, Revision 1

EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 0

EE-0718, North Anna Feedwater Temperature Uncertainty, Revision 1

14258.79-E-4, Short Circuit Currents 120 V AC Vital Buses and Misc. Circuits-App. R

Evaluation, Revision 1

ME-0491, Spent Fuel Pit Cooling System Analysis, Revision 0

NE-0154, Minimum Quantity for Fire Protection Low Pressure CO2 Tanks 1-FP-TK-06

and 1-FP-TK-5, Revision 002

NE-0165, Volume Calculation of North Anna Fire Zones Protected by Low Pressure CO2

Revision 000

Drawings

N-04150-0-1FE12AR, Wiring Diagram - Emergency Switchgear Room - Halon 1301

Aux Relay & Abort / Lockout Panels - North Anna Power Station - Units 1 & 2, Revision

0

N-04150-0-1FP089, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 1 Emergency Switchgear

Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0

N-04150-0-2FP041, Sheet 1, Fire Protection System - Unit 2 Emergency Switchgear

Room Halon Control & Alarm, Revision 0

N-051430101FE1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 0

N-05143-1-FE1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 0

N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-A, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision 0

N-05143-1-1ESK4CC-1-B, Outline Switchyard Monitor Panel, Revision1

11715-FE-1BB, One Line Diagram Electrical Distribution System, Revision 39

11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 11

11715-FE-1BD, One Line Switching Diagram Switchyard, Revision 27

11715-FH-32A, Treatment Lagoon Discharge Structure Dike III SH-1 North Anna Power

Station, Revision 5

NA-DW-6008D13, Loop #1 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0

NA-DW-6008D49, Loop #2 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0

NA-DW-6008D63, Loop #3 Feedwater Control System, Revision 0

Post Modification Testing

NASES 6.20 Attachment 2, Test Plan for DCP 05-112, Revision 1

NASES 6.22 Attachment 2, Testing and Inspection of FW RTDs for DCP 05-112,

Revision 0

Testing Release for 1-RC-LR-1310A, 02/19/2007

Testing Release for 2-RC-LR-2310A, 02/15/2007

Testing Release for 1-LM-PR-110B, 02/13/2007

Testing Release for 1-RH-TR-1604, 01/31/2007

Testing Release for 2-FW-LR-2477, 01/31/2007

Testing Release for 2-RH-TR-2604, 01/31/2007

Testing Release for 1-LW-FR-104, 01/10/2007

A-6

Attachment

Testing Release for 1-L0-XR-SGVRP, 01/31/2007

Testing Release for 2-LO-XR-SGVRP, 02/05/2007

Testing Release for 2-LM-PR-210B, 02/12/2007

Testing Release for 1-HC-H2R-101-1, 02/22/2007

Testing Release for 2-HC-H2R-201-2, 01/10/2007

Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2478, 02/26/2007

Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2488, 02/26/2007

Testing Release for 2-FW-FR-2498, 02/27/2007

Calibration Data

Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/02/2006

Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 11/30/2005

Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 01/02/2008

Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 06/04/2007

Calibration Data Record for NQC-0496, 12/01/2006

Technical Reports

NE-1401, Rev. 0, Operational Impact of Framatome Fuel and use of the

CASMO/SIMULATE Code Package at North Anna, April 2, 2004

NE-1452, Rev. 0, Reload Safety Analysis Checklist North Anna 2 Cycle 18 Pattern MOE,

September 22, 2005

NE-1453, Rev. 0, Addendum 002, Reload Safety Evaluation, North Anna 2 Cycle 18

Pattern MOE, April 2006

Engineering Transmittals

ET-SE-99-086, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly

Ingersoll-Dresser serial Number NE012911-01 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2,

Revision 0

ET-N-01-122, Evaluation of Hydraulic Performance of CH/HHSI Rotating Assembly

Flowserve BR/Order 7029-2673 - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1 and 2, Revision 0

ET-N-02-068, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump

2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0

ET- N-03-0144, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump

2-CH-P-1A - North Anna Power Station, Unit 2, Revision 0

ET- N-04-0057, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump

2-CH-P-1C - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0

ET- N-05-0072, Evaluation of Replacement Rotating Element for Charging Pump

2-CH-P-1B - North Anna Power Station, Unit 1, Revision 0

ET-N-07-0049, Revision to North Anna Technical Specifications Bases to Eliminate

Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time Tests and Periodic Protection Channel

Response Time Tests, Revision 0

ET-N-07-0077, Evaluation of Low Pressure CO2 System Vendor Calculation and Blower

Test, Revision 1

ET-N-07-0109, Estimating Water Flow Rate through Dike 3, Revision 0

A-7

Attachment

Vendor Manuals

59-W813-00006, Vendor Technical Manual for Weed Instrument RTD Temperature

Sensors

59-5984-00004, Component List For A Bill of Material, 3/20/02

Miscellaneous documents

AREVA Letter FAB06-226, North Anna Advanced Mark-BW Top Nozzle Change

Evaluation, March 29, 2006

Request for Engineering Assistance - Tracking No. R2003-128, 8/27/2003

NCRODP-6, Fire Protection System, 5/2/2007

Procurement Engineering Inspection Plan 208, 4/18/2002

Purchase Order no. 45526645, 7/18/2007

O-MAT-E-001, Electrical Loop Functional Checkout Sheet

Short Circuit Simulation Results for G102-1 and G102-2

NAP-0111, Specification for Vital Bus Static Inverters, Revision 0

CM-NA-FCI-0213, Enhanced Surveillance Program for Rosemount Transmitters IAW

CB 90-01: Loss of Oil-Fill in Transmitters Manufactured by Rosemount, Revison 0

LBDCR N-018, TS Bases Change Eliminate Periodic Pressure Sensor Response Time

Tests and Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests, Revision 0

WCAP-14036-P-A, Elimination of Periodic Protection Channel Response Time Tests,

Revision 1

Corrective Actions Written as a Result of this Inspection

CR100465, Receipt Inspection Package contains typographical error, 6/3/2008

Section 4OA5: Other Activities

Temporary Instruction (TI) 2515/166

Procedure VPAP-0301, Design Change Process, Revision 26

Procedure VPAP-0905, Insulation Control Program, Revision 4

DNES-VA-MAT-1007, Protective Coating Requirements for procured Equipment to be

Installed Inside Containment, Revision 0

Letter, VEPCO to USNRC, North Anna Power Station Units 1 and 2, Supplemental

Response to NRC GL 2004-02 Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency

Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at PWRs, dated February 29, 2008

Letter, USNRC to VEPCO, Kewaunee Power Station, Millstone Power Station, Units 2

and 3, North Anna Power Station Unit 1 and 2, Request for Extension of Completion

Dates for GL 2004-02 Corrective Actions, dated December 13, 2007

Design Change Package DCP-06015, NRC GSI-191, RWST Level ESFAS Function to

Support Containment Sump Modification, 08/14/07

Design Change Package DCP-07005, NRC GSI-191, Containment Sump Strainer

Interferences, 08/08/07

Design Change Package DCP-07129, NRC GSI-191, Piping Isulation Modifications,

08/08/07

A-8

Attachment

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS

Agency-wide Document Access and Management System

CA

Corrective Action

CAP

Corrective Action Program

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

CR

Condition Report

EDG

Emergency Diesel Generator

IMC

Inspection Manual Chapter

JPM

Job Performance Measures

LHSI

Low Head Safety Injection

NCV

Non-cited Violation

NRC

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

OD

Operability Determination

PARS

Publicly Available Records

PI

Performance Indicator

QS

Quench Spray

RCE

Root Cause Evaluation

RCP

Reactor Coolant Pump

RCS

Reactor Coolant System

RTP

Rated Thermal Power

SDP

Significance Determination Process

SR

Surveillance Requirements

TDAFWP

Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump

TS

Technical Specifications

UFSAR

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

URI

Unresolved Item

VEPCO

Virginia Electric and Power Company

VPAP

Virginia Power Administrative Procedure

WO

Work Order