IR 05000247/2011404: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Dear Mr. Ventosa:== | ==Dear Mr. Ventosa:== | ||
On December 31 ,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focused problem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)' | On December 31,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focused problem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)' | ||
The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection | The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on January 19,2012, with you and other members of your staff' | ||
results which were discussed on January 19,2012, with you and other members of The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and | The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected proledures and records, obseryed activities, and interviewed personnel. | ||
Two NRC identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Qreel as delermined by the Baseline Security Significince Determination Process) were identified during this inspection' | |||
Baseline Security Significince Determination Process) were identified during this The deficiencies weri promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physicat proieition and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. | The deficiencies weri promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physicat proieition and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site. | ||
These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirements. Further, a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, the NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from Enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. | Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from Enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled. | ||
OFFIGIAT USE ONtY SECURITY REtATES INFERM\TIEN | OFFIGIAT USE ONtY SECURITY REtATES INFERM\\TIEN | ||
OFFICNT USE ONtY SECURITY RETATEB INFORMATION | OFFICNT USE ONtY SECURITY RETATEB INFORMATION tf you contest any NCV in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the RegionalAdministrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at lndian Point Energy Center. | ||
Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution b-ecause Entergy's programs were not effective in: (1) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identifi programmatic and common cause problems [P.1(b)] and, (2)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(d)1. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you shiould provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the RegionalAdministrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center. | Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution b-ecause Entergy's programs were not effective in: (1) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identifi programmatic and common cause problems [P.1(b)] and, (2)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(d)1. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you shiould provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the RegionalAdministrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
/RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 oFFIEIALUSEENTY SECURIW_RETATEDINFORMATIoN | /RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 oFFIEIALUSEENTY SECURIW_RETATEDINFORMATIoN | ||
oFFICIAt USE ENLY SECURITY_REtATE}INFORMATION | oFFICIAt USE ENLY SECURITY_REtATE}INFORMATION lf you contest any NCV in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the RegionalAdministrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Indian Point Energy Center. | ||
Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution because Entergy's programs were not effective in: (a) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identify programmatic and common cause problems tP.1(b)land, (b)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(dI. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a reiponse within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center. | Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution because Entergy's programs were not effective in: (a) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identify programmatic and common cause problems tP.1(b)land, (b)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(dI. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a reiponse within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center. | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 Non.Publlc Dr.lgn.lion Ctt.gory: MD 3'4 lim.Publlo A'3 oocuueHl nNie: c.lDRs\pimisuppod Branch 1\Seuity12011 Draff OUo Roports\PECIIPEC 2011 Pl&R 404 Rw12.doq Cover Lollor | /RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 Non.Publlc Dr.lgn.lion Ctt.gory: MD 3'4 lim.Publlo A'3 oocuueHl nNie: c.lDRs\\pimisuppod Branch 1\\Seuity12011 Draff OUo Roports\\PECIIPEC 2011 Pl&R 404 Rw12.doq Cover Lollor El SUNSI Rvitr El Norsomitiv. | ||
zq12 | |||
El SeNitivo El Publidy Availablo El NorPublicly Available Covsr Lolter u/y' Endcurc(a) | |||
XE SUNSI Rvi6w XEI NoFsensitiv B S6reitiv6 XO Publicly Av.ilablo O NoGPublicly Availablo RI/DRS BI'PRS RlJtns JBrggnilOCC tor' | |||
KHss' | |||
Aohitnadic,Dcc fof 21u12 usl12 uu12 hr/bns RIiDfiP RYDRS wschnidvCcc fof MGray' | |||
JTrapp' | |||
zq12 2lsl12 2tst12 OFFICIAT USEgNtY SECURITY RETATEP INFERMNTION | |||
OFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY-REtATED INFORMATION Enclosure: | OFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY-REtATED INFORMATION Enclosure: | ||
| Line 63: | Line 69: | ||
D. Gagnon, Site Security Manager, Indian Point Site J. Sherry, Director, Office of Counter Terrorism, NY State, Department of Homeland Security F. Murray, President and CEO, NY State Energy Research and Development Authority cc w/o encl: Mo OUO-SRI: Distribution via ListServ EFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY RETTTED INFORMATION | D. Gagnon, Site Security Manager, Indian Point Site J. Sherry, Director, Office of Counter Terrorism, NY State, Department of Homeland Security F. Murray, President and CEO, NY State Energy Research and Development Authority cc w/o encl: Mo OUO-SRI: Distribution via ListServ EFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY RETTTED INFORMATION | ||
OFFIENT USE ONtY - SECURITY-REtATED INFORMATION Distribution w/o encl: Mo OUO-SRI: (via E-mail) | |||
W. Dean, RA (RIORAMAIL RESOURCE) | I W. Dean, RA D. Lew. DRA (RIORAMAIL RESOURCE) | ||
(RIORAMAlL RESOURCE) | |||
J. Tappert, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURGE) | J. Tappert, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURGE) | ||
J. Clifford, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURCE) | J. Clifford, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURCE) | ||
Revision as of 20:12, 12 January 2025
| ML12041A077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point |
| Issue date: | 02/09/2012 |
| From: | James Trapp Plant Support Branch 1 |
| To: | Ventosa J Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| References | |
| IR-11-404, IR-11-405 | |
| Download: ML12041A077 (5) | |
Text
SUBJECT:
INDIAN POINT ENERGY CENTER _ NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000247 l 20 1 1 40 4 AN D 05000 286 I 20 1 1 405
Dear Mr. Ventosa:
On December 31,2011, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a focused problem ldentification and Resolution inspection at your Indian Point Energy Center (IPEC)'
The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRC's Reactor Oversight process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results which were discussed on January 19,2012, with you and other members of your staff'
The inspection examined activities conducted under your licenses as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your licenses. The inspectors reviewed selected proledures and records, obseryed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Two NRC identified findings of very low security significance (i.e., Qreel as delermined by the Baseline Security Significince Determination Process) were identified during this inspection'
The deficiencies weri promptly corrected or compensated for, and the plant was in compliance with applicable physicat proieition and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the site.
These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC requirements. Further, a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low security significance is listed in this report. However, the NRC is treating these violations as non-cited violations (NCVs) consistent with Section2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.
Enclosure contains Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information. When separated from Enclosure, this transmittal document is decontrolled.
OFFIGIAT USE ONtY SECURITY REtATES INFERM\\TIEN
OFFICNT USE ONtY SECURITY RETATEB INFORMATION tf you contest any NCV in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the RegionalAdministrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at lndian Point Energy Center.
Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution b-ecause Entergy's programs were not effective in: (1) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identifi programmatic and common cause problems P.1(b) and, (2)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(d)1. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you shiould provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the RegionalAdministrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center.
ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the publicly Available Records.(PARS) component of NRC's Agencyruide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
However, the materialenclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 1o irn 2.390(dX1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefoie, the material in the enclosure will ngt be made_a^vailable electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). lf you choose to provide a response and security-Related lnformation is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire iesponse "security-Related Information - Withhold from public disclosure under iO Cfn 2.390'; in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(dX1) and follow the instructions for witnnotOing in 10 CFR 2.390(bX1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(bX1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response'
Sincerely,
/RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 oFFIEIALUSEENTY SECURIW_RETATEDINFORMATIoN
oFFICIAt USE ENLY SECURITY_REtATE}INFORMATION lf you contest any NCV in the enclosed report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the RegionalAdministrator, Region l; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Indian Point Energy Center.
Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Problem ldentification and Resolution because Entergy's programs were not effective in: (a) periodically trending and assessing information from the corrective action program and other assessments in aggregate to identify programmatic and common cause problems tP.1(b)land, (b)taking appropriate corrective actions to address safety issues in a timely manner, commensurate with their security significance tP.1(dI. lf you disagree with a cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a reiponse within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region I and the NRC Resident lnspector at Indian Point Energy Center.
ln accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Doqument Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
However, the materialenclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 1O ifn 2.390(dX1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made_available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). lf you choose to provide a response and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire iesponse "security-Related lnformation - Withhold from public disclosure under iO Cfn 2.390'; in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(dX1) and follow the instructions for withhotding in 10 CFR 2.390(bX1). In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(bX1 )(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response'
Sincerely,
/RN James M. Trapp, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor SafetY Docket Nos. 50-247, 50-286 License Nos. DPR-26, DPR-64 Non.Publlc Dr.lgn.lion Ctt.gory: MD 3'4 lim.Publlo A'3 oocuueHl nNie: c.lDRs\\pimisuppod Branch 1\\Seuity12011 Draff OUo Roports\\PECIIPEC 2011 Pl&R 404 Rw12.doq Cover Lollor El SUNSI Rvitr El Norsomitiv.
El SeNitivo El Publidy Availablo El NorPublicly Available Covsr Lolter u/y' Endcurc(a)
XE SUNSI Rvi6w XEI NoFsensitiv B S6reitiv6 XO Publicly Av.ilablo O NoGPublicly Availablo RI/DRS BI'PRS RlJtns JBrggnilOCC tor'
KHss'
Aohitnadic,Dcc fof 21u12 usl12 uu12 hr/bns RIiDfiP RYDRS wschnidvCcc fof MGray'
JTrapp'
zq12 2lsl12 2tst12 OFFICIAT USEgNtY SECURITY RETATEP INFERMNTION
OFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY-REtATED INFORMATION Enclosure:
I nspection Report 05000247 l 20 1 1 404 and 05000 286 I 20 1 1 405 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information (OUO-SRl)
cc w/encl: w/oUd-SRl:
D. Gagnon, Site Security Manager, Indian Point Site J. Sherry, Director, Office of Counter Terrorism, NY State, Department of Homeland Security F. Murray, President and CEO, NY State Energy Research and Development Authority cc w/o encl: Mo OUO-SRI: Distribution via ListServ EFFICIAT USE ONtY SECURITY RETTTED INFORMATION
OFFIENT USE ONtY - SECURITY-REtATED INFORMATION Distribution w/o encl: Mo OUO-SRI: (via E-mail)
I W. Dean, RA D. Lew. DRA (RIORAMAIL RESOURCE)
(RIORAMAlL RESOURCE)
J. Tappert, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURGE)
J. Clifford, DRP (RIDRPMAIL RESOURCE)
C. Miller, DRS (RIDRSMAIL RESOURCE)
P. Wilson, DRS (RIDRSMAIL RESOURCE)
L. Chang, Rl OEDO M. Gray, DRP B. Bickett, DRP S. McCarver, DRP M. Jennerich, DRP A. Ayegbusi, DRP M. Halter, DRP D. Hochmuth, DRP RidsNrrPMlndianPoint Resource RidsNrrDorlLpll -1 Resource ROPreport Resource Distribution w/encl : wiOUO-SRI:
J. Trapp, DRS A. Dimitriadis, DRS M. Catts, SRI P. Cataldo, SRI R. Albert, NSIR S. Coker, NSIR C. Johnson, NSIR B. Desai, DRS, Rll R. Skokowski, DRS, Rlll M. Hay, DRS, RIV OFFIGIAT USE ONtY SECURIW RETATED INFORMATIEN