ML14071A078: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[ML14071A074]]
| number = ML14071A078
| issue date = 02/20/2014
| title = Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562
| author name =
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000348
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = NL-14-0249
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 56
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7 UNIT 1 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS) (Version 2.0)
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Page 1 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 3 Fl-    00q                                                                            Status: YO NCI Ur-Seosmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QICIIEOOO4B                      Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121'                    Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified on 8/23/12 per SEWS packagedated04/1994
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YO NO UO N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NO UO NIAO oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YIN NO UO NIAO
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YI  NO UO N/Al (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified on 8/23/12 per SEWS pack.gedated 04/1994
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    ' Enter dhe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 2 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NE UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentID No. OICIIEO004B                  Equip. Class, I.2.
Equipment Description REACTOR- TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 Interaction Efrects
: 7. Are soft targets frce from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO UlO N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UO NIA" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overhead equipment is adequatelysupportedandjudged not to presentan adverse seismic condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              Y* NO Ul N/AD All Internaland external lines have adequateflexibility to not cause a seismic concern.
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    Y0 NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
IPEEE vulnerabilityof possible interatlonwith an adjacentcabinet has been resolved by bolting the cabinets together.
Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YS NO Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All mounting hardwareappearsto be Intactand in good condition. No adverse seismic concerns were noted.
ComMents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Externalinspection and anchorageverificationperformed on 8123/12-InternalsInpectionperformed 10//13.
Evaluated by: BSan Nelson                        ,      ,.--                      Date: 10/9/13 Nikdle Arrant                                                          110913 Page 3 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-004 (Q1CllEOOO4B)                                    Sheet 3 of 3 Page 4 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI U-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QE110=Q3594B                    Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139                      Room, Area 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YO NO U0 N/AIQ Anchorage confirmedSAT on 9/10/12
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YO NO UO N/AQ oxidation?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?  YO NOI UOI N/AQl Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YI-  NO UO N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 5 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO ND UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID Na. Q1ElIL03594B                Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description CTMTSUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NEI UDI N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj@ N3 U3 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO Nrl Ur' N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YOl ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SA T originally on 9/10/12.
Final wagcdown performed to Inspect cabinetinternals.
Area Walk-by in folderF1-48 Date:  1&913 Page 6 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 7 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 8 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                  NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE U" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8701B                    Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHR INLET INSOLATION VAL1V Location: Bldg. CTMT                Floor El. 105'          Room, Area 105' INSIDE BIOSHIELD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraie I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one  YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline Component - No anchorage
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO NEI UO N/AO Inline Component - No anchorage
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NO UO NIAO oxidation?
Inline Component - No anchorage
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YIO NO UD N/AO Inline Component - No anchorage
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NO UO NWAR (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Inline Component - No anchorage
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of            YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
  ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 9 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y    NO uE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIEl1MOV8701B              Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description MHR INLET INSOLATiON VALVE Interaction Effets
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO UD N/AO No soft targets were Identified that could be Impacted by nearby equipment or structures.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y* NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
A#l overheadequipment is supported adequatelyand no seismic concerns were noted.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO UO N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
No conditionswere identified which would result in a potentiallyadverse seismic condition.
Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YN NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No other adverse seismic conditions were noted.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk By performed in conjunction with this SWC for Containment 105' Elevation.
Walkdown and SWC performed on 9/30/13 has been retyped and re-signedfor clarity.
Evaluated by: BrianN4eon                  .                                    Date:        //
Nikole ArrantgQ'f'I                                                              ZOO Page 10 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-008                                              Sheet 3 of 4 Page 11 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-008                                          Sheet 4 of 4 Page 12 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
                                                                ..- 3C..                          Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YO N[ U[-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIHI 1NGASC2506C Equip.
Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS-CABINET C Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155                        Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO NO UO N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NO Ur N/AC oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NE    UO N/AC
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NEI UC N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/21/12 againstSEWS for Q2H1INGASC2506D, C, and 02H1 1NGPIC2505A (Unit 2 Counter Part).
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspect cabinet internals.
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 13 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YO NEI Ur]
Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentID No. OIHIINASC25                  Equip.
EquipmentDescription AU S-AFEGUARD$ CA8 NETC Interuction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YE3 NO UC] N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment. distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YC9 N[    U13 N/Ar' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YC9 NO3 U[    N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO N3 U1-I of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      Yo NO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
A cable anda spare cable was Identifiedto be secured to existing ternirnalblocks. The ltrminalblocks were determinedto be spares containingno active wiing and adequatelymounted to the cabinetL AdditonaIf, the cables were not in contactwith any other equipent other than spares.ConditionIs evaluted as OK by SWEs.
Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originallyon 8/21/12 QIH1 1NGNASC25O6C contained IPEEESeismic Outfisem These outliers were 1.) potential Interactionfrom overheadlight, and 2.) potentialinteraction from panels OSHi 1NGR2504, QSHI 1NGH2514-AB and QIHI 1NGSS2504. The outlierresolutionwas to restrainthe overhead light and bolt the adjacentpanels together.The light was judged to be adequately restrainedand aNl panels have been bolted together.IPEEEoutlierIs confirmed to be resolved.
CabinetInternals inspectedon 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditions have been noted.
Page 14 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Evaluated by: Ryan HArlo        fise                        Date:  1 Tni'Ior YoungbhmYd                                    I  I Page 15 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 16 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 17 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 18 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                  NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 ri 0            n3l                                                          Status: Yo NEI Ut]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1H11NG02504J                    Equip. Class' 2Q Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET J Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155'                    Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YO NO U" N/AD
: 3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface          YO NO UiD N/AD oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?  YO NO UO N/AC]
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YO NO UU1 N/AO" (Nole: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration verified on &/28/12perSEWS package dated 5/26/94.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          Y*O N    UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 19 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                              NO. SNCF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIHI1NGB2504J                Equip. Class' 20.
Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINETJ Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightinj and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Many of the 7300 cards have recently been replaced.All mounting hardware(screws,nuts, bolts, eto) are In good conditon. Al cables ha adequate flex.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
This item was noted as an IPEEEoutlierfor unrestrainedoverhead fig, the structure Independently from the ceiling tile system and isjudgi Watcdown and SWC orginalyperformed on 8/9/13 andhas been retyl Evaluated by: Taylor Younoblood "L              .    ?      -    (  1 Bria,, Nelso-                    _v                  r Page 20 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-037                                              Sheet 3 of 4 Page 21 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0..-
F1-037                                            Sheet 4 of 4
                                                                                  .,
                                                                                    -r Page 22 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0      4 Sheet 1 of.W'f 1 .*-4' Fl-                          Status: YO N[      UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QiH1 1NAGNIS2503A                Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB INET Location: Bldg. A=IARY Floor El. 155                        Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorape
: i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YO NO3 UD N/AO-
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          Yl Ni3 UO N/AQ-oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NO Ur- N/AO
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YO N[3 UI- N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistenton 8/21/12 againstSEWS for Q I 1NGNIS2503A and 02H1 INGNIS2503A
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum Is being performedto inspect cabinetInternals.
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 23 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0    -
Sheet2oD"X'  v.,q"q Status: Y0 NE UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH 11NGNIS25I3A            Equip. Class '20 Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB INET Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO U0 NIAO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and fighting, YO NO U[ N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO U- N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      YO NOE Ur of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Condition
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinetInternalswere Inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.All internalconnections androutedcables have been determinedto be adequate andpose no adverseseismic conditon.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originallyon 8/21/12. IPEEEOutlierwas vedfied to be resolvedduring 8/21/12 wakdown.
Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to Inspect cabinetinternals.No adverse seismic conditions noted.
Evaluated by: Rvan Harlos f
Date: 44I Taylr Yowwbl"ood                    a-get
                                                                                          -
Page 24 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet,4'ofA'  '* aLq Page 25 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee!;oV    / .%a -4 Page 26 of 217
 
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Sbeetlotg~ir 1 *dqý Page 27 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1.I-  tjc>                            Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NO Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH1INGPIC25*O5F Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CABINETCHANNEL 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155                      Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YO NO U[3 N/AO3
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YO NO U[3 N/AO oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?  YO NO UO N/Ar'
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YO NO UO N/AF1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anhorage verfied to be consistenton 8/21/12 againstSEWS for QIH1 INGPIC2505F, QIH1 INAGPIC2505H, and QIHI 1NOSSP250WJ.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YS NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verfied SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum is being perfomed to inspect cabinet internals.
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 28 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yo NO U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH11NGPIC2505F Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CAWINET.CHANNEL 2 Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO UD N/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y18 NO Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO U[      N/A[Q
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YOl NO3 UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinetinternalswere inspectedand no missing fasteners were observed All internalconnections and routedcables have been determinedto be adequateandpose no adverseseismic condition.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originallyon 8/21/12.
Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to inspectcabinet internals. No adverse seismic conditionshave been noted.
Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos e;ýý                                      Date:      12h Tavlor Youngblohw    j.        1.od Page 29 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 30 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 31 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 32 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Yl NO uiO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH11NGR25041                    Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location: Bldg. ALIILLARY Floor El. 155                      Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorafe
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO NOI U-    N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NO Un N/Al oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YCK NO UI    N/AD
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NO UI    NIA0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No adverse seismic conditions were noted dunng the Inspection.
    ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 33 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OIH11NGR25041              Equip. Class' Equipment Description RADIATION MONITOR PANEL
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO U[3 N/AQ
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[3 N/AQ]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YIM NOI U-I NIAQ
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    Y1@ NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      Yl    NO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet Internalswere inspected and no missing fasteners were observed AN Internalconnections and routedcables have been determined to be adequateand pose no adverse seismic condition.
CommeLnIL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originallyon 8/21/12. IPEEEOutler verified to be resolvedon 8/21112.
Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to inspect cabinetinternals. No adverse seismic conditions noted Evaluated by: PRsn Hsrlos                                                        Date:    a  i Tailrc Eoungblood                                                            IF/
Page 34 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4
                                -j Page 35 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 36 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                  NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[  NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1H1INGSSP2506G Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155'                      Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorae
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YNN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO NOI U- N/AC
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO NOI U" N/AI oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NO U- N/A-
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NO U- N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configurationverified on 8/21/12per SEWS package dated 5/25&94.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO U']
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 37 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                            NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Fl-'oq7-                                                                        Status: Y0 NO uED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. O1HU1NGSSP2506G Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO Ul- N/AD-
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO U[3 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO UO N/AO
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free      Y* NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YO NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AN mounting hardware(screws%bolts, nuts, eta) Is intact and in good condition.
This Item was noted as an IPEEEoutlierfor unrestrainedoverheadlight. AU lightingis suspended from the structureindependently from the ceiling tile system and is Judged to be adequate. Other vulnerability (adjacentcabinet) Is addressedIn SWC performed 8/21/12.
Walkdown and SWC originallyperformed 9/19/13 and has been retypedfor clarity.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson          ..                                          Date:  -111611V Nikole Arratt          dý-
1  I'D Wlq Page 38 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-042                                              Sheet 3 of 3 I
Page 39 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y0 NO ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)                        Ft-- 43 Equipment ID No. QIH21EO05                      Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16tKV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONTPANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121                      Room, Area 233 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Cheddist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorase
: i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          YN NO Ur N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface          YI@ NO UI    N/An oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NO UO N/AI
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?        YO NO Ur N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using SEWS for Q1H21EO05, dated 5/25194. The anchorage was verified to match Attachment A of the SEWS which documents the previously evaluatedanchorageconfiguration.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          Y* NO UI potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter Mheequipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 40 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NrO u-[
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01H21E005                    Equip. Class', 9 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO NO U0- N/AD
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl    N[3 U[3 N/A[
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO N[3 Url N/An
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      Y0 ND UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed originally on 8/22/12. Second performance beingperformed to inspect cabinet intemals and perform anchorageverification.
CabinetInternalsinspected and anchorageverification completed on 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditions noted.
Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos          E 4
E    _¶                              Date:
11o I/I-ie Tavlor Youneblood .1 I
q'U00
                                                              #
Page 41 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet q of 6 Page 42 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 43 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 44 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 45 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                    NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y0 NO U"]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)                        I=I -.94%
Equipment ID No. 0IH21E505                        Equip. Class, .20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR WJ LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. DIEM                Floor El. 15.5          Room, Area W56C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Ancborage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YC§ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS dated5/2611994
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?          Y0 NO1U1 N/AQ
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            YO ND UD N/AQ oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YZ N[3 UO N/An
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NOI Un N/Arl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using SEWS for 0 1H21E505, dated 5/2W/4.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO N[l UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    ' Enaer Mheequipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 46 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE      Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01H21E505                  Equip. Class'_2  -
Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR WJ LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YN NO UO NIAO Conduit <11/8 from side of panel. Was identified during IPEEE walkdown and the cabinet was restrainedto prevent impact therefore condition is SAT. See SWC from 10/25/12 for furtherdetails.
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y09 Nil UQ NIAO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO UO NIAQ
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO Ni    UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YO NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed odginally on 10/25/12. Second performance being performed to inspect cabinet internals andperform anchorageverification.
CabinetInternals inspectedand anchorageverificationperformed on 11/713. No adverse seismic conditions noted.
                                                          -f    ,
Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos                                                        Date:
I't Taylor Yogn,6biood      ldJae    4      O-Page 47 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 48 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 49 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet s of s Page 50 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 6 FI-Ots&#xfd;                                                                              Status: YN NEI U[]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH21E506                        Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location: Bldg. SWIS                Floor El. 188'          Room. Area 72E Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorave
: 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one Y0 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified to be consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24/94.
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware?            YO NEI Ur3 N/AO
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface            Y* NOI Url N/Arl oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?    YO NOI Ur N/AO
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?          YO NO Uo N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24/94.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of          YO NO Ut3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
    ' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 51 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS                                  NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YO N_ UiJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIH21ES06                  Equip. Class', 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IK LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?      YO N[3 UO3 N/AO
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NOl U[3 N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?              YO NO UO N/AD
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free    YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could      YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All cableshave adequateflex. All mounting hardware Is Intact and appears ingood condition. No adverse seismic conditions were noted.
Comaalfts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Etemr Inspection performed 8/24/12. IPEEEoutlfIer confirmed to be resolved during Inital walkdow.r Second walkdown to Inspect Internalsperformed on 10/16/13 found no adverseseismic conditions.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson g*$':-                                                Date: 10W16/13 Nikole Arrant                                                          10/16113 Page 52 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (QIH21E506)                                      Sheet 3 of 6 Page 53 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (Q1H21ES06)                                      Sheet 4 of 6 Page 54 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS        NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (QIH21ESO6)                                        Sheet 5 of 6 Page 55 of 217
 
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS      NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-045 (Q1H21E5O)                                      Sheet 6 of 6 Page 56 of 217}}

Revision as of 07:02, 4 November 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A078&oldid=2051816"