ML17059B669: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17059B669
| number = ML17059B669
| issue date = 07/09/1997
| issue date = 07/09/1997
| title = Rev 0 to S0.0SQUGLAR1, Limited Analytical Review of Cable Tray Support.
| title = Rev 0 to S0.0SQUGLAR1, Limited Analytical Review of Cable Tray Support
| author name = Agosta C, Alvi M
| author name = Agosta C, Alvi M
| author affiliation = NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
| author affiliation = NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:N El NIQHAwK CALCULATIONCOVER SHEET NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Total Last
{{#Wiki_filter:N El NIQHAwK CALCULATIONCOVER SHEET NUCLEARENGINEERING ATTACHNEitIT 0 Page1(Next~>
                                                                                                          ~
)
ATTACHNEitIT 0 Page1(Next~>
Total~
                                                                                                          ~~
Last ~~
                                                                                                                              )
NINE MILEPOINT NUCLEARSTATION Unit(1,2orO=Both):
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION                  Unit(1,2orO=Both):     1           Discipline:   STRUCTURAL TNe                                                           Catcutstton No.
1 Discipline:
UMITED ANALYTICALREVIEW OF CABLE TRAY SUPPORT                SO.OSQUGLARI (Sub)system(s)             Buikfing     Floor Elev. Index No.
STRUCTURAL TNe UMITEDANALYTICALREVIEW OF CABLETRAY SUPPORT Catcutstton No.
NA                          RB           261           SO.O Originator(s)
SO.OSQUGLARI (Sub)system(s)
CARMEN R. AGOSTA Design Rev                 Descrl tion           Chan eNo.       B           Date       Chk         Date       A             Date 00            INITIALISSUE                  NA Computer Output/Microfilm Filed Separately (Yes / No/ NA): NA               Safety Class (SR/ NSR/ Qxx): SR Superseded Document(s):          NONE Document Cross Reference(s) - For additional references see page(s): NA Ref                                                                                 Doc No                                 Document No.                                   T             Index       Sheet       Rev NER-1 S-012                                                            NER                                      00 General Reference(s):
NA Buikfing Floor Elev.
Index No.
RB 261 SO.O Originator(s)
CARMEN R. AGOSTA Rev 00 Descrl tion INITIALISSUE Design Chan eNo.
B NA Date Chk Date A
Date Computer Output/MicrofilmFiled Separately (Yes / No/ NA): NA Superseded Document(s):
NONE Safety Class (SR/ NSR/ Qxx): SR Document Cross Reference(s) - For additional references see page(s):
NA Ref No NER-1 S-012 Document No.
Doc T
NER Index Sheet Rev 00 General Reference(s):
: 2. GENERIC IMPLIMENTATIONPROCEDURE (GIP)
: 2. GENERIC IMPLIMENTATIONPROCEDURE (GIP)
: 3. NMPC Letter to NRC, File Code NMP1L 1044, dated March 11, 1996 Remarks:
: 3. NMPC Letter to NRC, File Code NMP1L 1044, dated March 11, 1996 Remarks:
NONE Confirmation Required (Yes/ No): No       Final Issue Status           File Location           Operations Acceptance See Page(s):                               (APP/FIO/VOI):APP             (Gale/Hold): Gale Required(Yes/No):                 No Evaluation Number(s) / Revision: NR                           Component ID(s) / EPN(s) / Line Number(s):
NONE Confirmation Required (Yes/ No): No Final Issue Status File Location Operations Acceptance See Page(s):
Copy of Applicability Review Attached (Yes / N/R)?N/R        NA Key Words: NMP-1, STRUCTURAL, SQUG, SEISMIC VERIFICATION, CABLE TRAY SUPPORT FORMAT 0 NEP-DES48-F0140 970S070iM           9707M PDR,       ADOG(tt 05000220 PDR t
(APP/FIO/VOI):APP (Gale/Hold): Gale Required(Yes/No): No Evaluation Number(s) / Revision: NR Copy ofApplicabilityReview Attached (Yes / N/R)?N/R Component ID(s) / EPN(s) / Line Number(s):
NA Key Words: NMP-1, STRUCTURAL, SQUG, SEISMIC VERIFICATION,CABLETRAYSUPPORT FORMAT0 NEP-DES48-F0140 970S070iM 9707M
: PDR, ADOG(tt 05000220 PDR t


r V
r V


H T NIAGARA IiIJ MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET                                           Page   Z (Next ~~I Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station                 Unit: 1                                     Disposition:
HT NIAGARA IiIJ MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET Page Z (Next~~I Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit:
Ortgtnator ate                   Checker/Date M           7-'I-'l7         Catcuhtton No.
1 Disposition:
SO.OSQUGLAR1 Revfslon 00 ef.
Ortgtnator ate ef.
PURPOSE:       Document the Limiting Analytical Review (LAR) evaluation for a typical Reactor Building cable tray support having a cast in-place cast iron insert as a anchor to the underside of the 281 foot elevation concrete slab.
Checker/Date Catcuhtton No.
This LAR has been prepared as part of the commitment to use the SQUG (GIP) methodology to document the seismic adequacy of cable tray supports.
Revfslon M
7-'I-'l7 SO.OSQUGLAR1 00 PURPOSE:
Document the LimitingAnalytical Review (LAR) evaluation for a typical Reactor Building cable tray support having a cast in-place cast iron insert as a anchor to the underside of the 281 foot elevation concrete slab.
This LAR has been prepared as part ofthe commitment to use the SQUG (GIP) methodology to document the seismic adequacy of cable tray supports.
CONCLUSION: This cable support meets the GIP requirements.
CONCLUSION: This cable support meets the GIP requirements.
ATTACHMENTS A. LAR for a cable tray support having cast iron inserts.
ATTACHMENTS A. LARfor a cable tray support having cast iron inserts.
                                                                                            ¹ FORMAT NEP-DES48, Rev. 01 (F02)
FORMAT¹ NEP-DES48, Rev. 01 (F02)


El Y N1AGARA lLU MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET Unit: 1 (Next Disposition:
El Y N1AGARA lLU MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET Page ~A (Next~
                                                                                                      ~
Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Originator/Date ef.
Page ~A Originator/Date                Checker/Date                        Caicuhtion No.                   Revhion SO.OSQUGLAR1                     00 ef.
Unit:
ATTACHMENTA LIMITINGANALYTICALREVIEW EVALUATION¹1 REVlBNEO        ~4
1 Checker/Date Disposition:
                                                >T/gc~zgE:~      A~          I NIAGARAIi/iag+gt Pggfg CORPORNION NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEI%RTI%NF DISPOSITION OF QSMITTAL ACCEPTED ACCEPTED WITH CHANGES NNED Q NOT ACCEPTED 0 REVISE 5 RE   8 IT SIGNATURE:                 DATE:Z-<<~
Caicuhtion No.
SO.OSQUGLAR1 Revhion 00 ATTACHMENTA LIMITINGANALYTICALREVIEW EVALUATION&#xb9;1 DISPOSITION OF QSMITTAL ACCEPTED ACCEPTED WITH CHANGES NNED Q NOT ACCEPTED 0 REVISE 5 RE 8
IT SIGNATURE:
DATE:Z-<<~
UNT.e/
UNT.e/
                                                                                      &#xb9; FORMAT NEP-DES@8, Rev. 01 (F02)
REVlBNEO
>T/gc~zgE:~
A~~4 I NIAGARAIi/iag+gtPggfg CORPORNION NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEI%RTI%NF FORMAT&#xb9; NEP-DES@8, Rev. 01 (F02)


SUBJECT     JOB ND 95C 277l         sHEETJ!iMOF3 ol db 1 0
STEVENSON
0 S,C, /-I-STEVENSON
&ASSOCIATES SUBJECT JOB ND 95C 277l sHEETJ!iMOF3 0
& ASSOCIATES 5    I 0 Sl<
ol db 1
                                          ~ 4 Z   4 i R  2 A   0 2.
S,C, /-I-0 5
I 0 Sl<
R 2
~
4 Z
4 i
A 0 2.


OB NO.       91C2771                             heetAf.3 of SaA                        ALCULATION: C406                                  evislon 0 STEVENSON & ASSOCIATES               Ine I@I!e Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited a structural-mechanical       nalytlcal Review consulting engineering firm LAR &#xb9;1 Dead Load Check                  ATTACHMENT CALC NO REVISION PAGE NO The worst case is member 4 - unistrut P1000.
SaA OB NO.
91C2771 ALCULATION:
C406 heetAf.3 of evislon 0
STEVENSON &ASSOCIATES Ine I@I!e Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited a structural-mechanical nalytlcal Review consulting engineering firm Dead Load Check LAR&#xb9;1 ATTACHMENT CALC NO REVISION PAGE NO The worst case is member 4 - unistrut P1000.
For L=36" unistrut capacity = 1130 Ib (Ref. 6.2, page 5) 1130 Ib > 278 Ib Hence the unistrut is OK.
For L=36" unistrut capacity = 1130 Ib (Ref. 6.2, page 5) 1130 Ib > 278 Ib Hence the unistrut is OK.
(1/2" threaded rod)
(1/2" threaded rod)
Load per one rod:
Load per one rod:
(150+ 140+ 150+ 278) x 0.50 = 718 x 0.5 = 360 Ib Max safe load = 7670 Ib 7670 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the vertical member is OK.
(150+ 140+ 150+ 278) x 0.50 = 718 x 0.5 = 360 Ib Max safe load = 7670 Ib 7670 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the vertical member is OK.
Capacity of cast iron inserts = 1360 Ib (Ref. 6.6, page 6) 1360 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the inserts are OK. SF = 1360/360 = 3.78
Capacity of cast iron inserts = 1360 Ib (Ref. 6.6, page 6) 1360 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the inserts are OK.
            /
SF = 1360/360 = 3.78
Vertical Capacity Check 360 x 3 = 1080 Ib < 1360 Ib         OK           SF = 1360   / 1080 = 1.26 Ductility Check This support is considered ductile (see Ref. 6.4, 8.3.3 for Rod Hanger Trapeze Supports).
/
Vertical Capacity Check 360 x 3 = 1080 Ib < 1360 Ib OK SF = 1360 / 1080 = 1.26 DuctilityCheck This support is considered ductile (see Ref. 6.4, 8.3.3 for Rod Hanger Trapeze Supports).
Lateral Load Check No lateral load check is required since the support is ductile (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.4).
Lateral Load Check No lateral load check is required since the support is ductile (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.4).
Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluation Support resonant frequency (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.5):
Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluation Support resonant frequency (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.5):
f sup = =
1 Ks 1
1   Ks     1   5't4
5't4 fsup==
                              = 0.84 Hz where 2m   Ms   2n 186 W= 360 x 2 = 720 Ib (total dead weight on the pair of rod supports) g = 386.4 in/sec
= 0.84 Hz where 2m Ms 2n 186 W= 360 x 2 = 720 Ib (total dead weight on the pair of rod supports) g = 386.4 in/sec


OB NO.     91C2771                                 hect III 9 of  It.
88,A STEVENSON &ASSOCIATES a structural-mechanical consulting engineering firm OB NO.
88,A                      ALCULATION: C406                                   evision  0 STEVENSON & ASSOCIATES Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited                           y: KC   ol)II/9'I a structural-mechanical        nalytical Review consulting engineering firm                                                          heck: ~.C,   f-II-'IY LAR &#xb9;1 E = 29x10'psi (elastic modulus of steel)
91C2771 ALCULATION:
I = 0.05x0.406  =%36x10 in (moment of inertia of rod root section, d = 0.406 per page 4-147 of Ref. 6.1))
C406 Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited nalytical Review hect III 9 of It.
L = 32" (length of rod above top tier)
evision 0
Ks=2 Ms=
y:
12EI L
KC ol)II/9'I heck: ~.C, f-II-'IY LAR&#xb9;1 ATTACHMENT REVISION PAGE NO See attached comparison of Floor Response Spectra to Rod Fatigue Bounding Spectra (RB 281).
3 720
                +
W L
                    =2 12x29x10
                =186 Ib-sec 2 /in
                                ~
32'2 xt36x10
                                            +
720
                                                    = 514 Ibfin                                ATTACHMENT REVISION PAGE NO 386.4 See attached comparison of Floor Response Spectra to Rod Fatigue Bounding Spectra (RB 281).
Use 0.5 g and go to Fig. 8-12 of Ref. 6.4.
Use 0.5 g and go to Fig. 8-12 of Ref. 6.4.
At L = 32" the maximum acceptable weight is > 2.2 k. This is far above 720 Ib applied to both rods.
At L = 32" the maximum acceptable weight is > 2.2 k. This is far above 720 Ib applied to both rods.
Line 91: Line 110:
(
(
This support meets the GIP requirements.
This support meets the GIP requirements.
E = 29x10'psi (elastic modulus of steel)
I = 0.05x0.406
=%36x10 in (moment of inertia of rod root section, d = 0.406 per page 4-147 of Ref. 6.1))
L= 32" (length of rod above top tier) 12EI W
12x29x10 xt36x10 720 Ks=2 3
+=2
+
= 514 Ibfin L
L 32'2 720 2
~
Ms=
=186 Ib-sec /in 386.4


JOB NO. 93C2771                                       SHEET         &#xb9; Ig SBA                    CALCULATION: C-006                                    OF 19 STEVENSON               Nine Mile'Point Unit   1 Raceway Limited             Revision 0 8i ASSOCIATES               Analytical Review                                     By /Qa/-~He a structural-mechanical                                                              Chk. Kc e> zv yy consulting engineering firm A'rTACHMENr Qt,C RP REVISfpN 6.0      References                                                                PAGE Np 6.1. "Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL, 1989.
SBA JOB NO. 93C2771 CALCULATION: C-006 SHEET &#xb9; Ig OF 19 STEVENSON Nine Mile'Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited 8i ASSOCIATES Analytical Review a structural-mechanical consulting engineering firm Revision 0 By /Qa/-~He Chk. Kc e>
6.2.   "General Engineering Catalog", No. 10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation, Wayne, MI, 1983.
zv yy 6.0 References A'rTACHMENr Qt,C RP REVISfpN PAGE Np 6.1.
6.3.   "Design Response Spectra for Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Reactor Building and Turbine   Building, Stevenson & Associates, February 1992, 6.4.   "Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification UtilityGroup.
"Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL, 1989.
6.5. A-46 GIP Walkdown Notes, 1993.
6.2.
"General Engineering Catalog", No. 10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation, Wayne, MI, 1983.
6.3.
"Design Response Spectra for Nine MilePoint Unit 1, Reactor Building and Turbine Building, Stevenson &Associates, February 1992, 6.4.
"Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification ofNuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification UtilityGroup.
6.5.
A-46 GIP Walkdown Notes, 1993.
I
I
    .6   "Development of Load Capacities of Cast Iron Inserts and Q-Decking at Nine Mile Point  Unit'",
.6 "Development of Load Capacities ofCast Iron Inserts and Q-Decking at Nine MilePoint Unit'",
Stevenson & Associates, Project No. 92C2757, January 1993.
Stevenson &Associates, Project No. 92C2757, January 1993.
I                                                 I 6.7     "Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape", R. D. Blevins, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979.
I I
6.8   Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Drawing No.       C-1533~.
6.7 "Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape", R. D. Blevins, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979.
6.9   Globe Strut Catalogue G443, Rev. 9/89, G. S. Metals, 6.10 T. J. Cope Catalogue or Power Strut Catalogue &#xb9;20-3R, 1973.
6.8 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Nine MilePoint Unit 1, Drawing No. C-1533~.
6.9 Globe Strut Catalogue G443, Rev. 9/89, G. S. Metals, 6.10 T. J. Cope Catalogue or Power Strut Catalogue &#xb9;20-3R, 1973.


    'I)
'I)
P 0'l}}
P 0'l}}

Latest revision as of 11:45, 9 January 2025

Rev 0 to S0.0SQUGLAR1, Limited Analytical Review of Cable Tray Support
ML17059B669
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/09/1997
From: Agosta C, Alvi M
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17059B657 List:
References
S.0SQUGLAR1, S.0SQUGLAR1-R, S0.0SQUGLAR1, S0.0SQUGLAR1-R00, NUDOCS 9708070154
Download: ML17059B669 (14)


Text

N El NIQHAwK CALCULATIONCOVER SHEET NUCLEARENGINEERING ATTACHNEitIT 0 Page1(Next~>

)

Total~

Last ~~

NINE MILEPOINT NUCLEARSTATION Unit(1,2orO=Both):

1 Discipline:

STRUCTURAL TNe UMITEDANALYTICALREVIEW OF CABLETRAY SUPPORT Catcutstton No.

SO.OSQUGLARI (Sub)system(s)

NA Buikfing Floor Elev.

Index No.

RB 261 SO.O Originator(s)

CARMEN R. AGOSTA Rev 00 Descrl tion INITIALISSUE Design Chan eNo.

B NA Date Chk Date A

Date Computer Output/MicrofilmFiled Separately (Yes / No/ NA): NA Superseded Document(s):

NONE Safety Class (SR/ NSR/ Qxx): SR Document Cross Reference(s) - For additional references see page(s):

NA Ref No NER-1 S-012 Document No.

Doc T

NER Index Sheet Rev 00 General Reference(s):

2. GENERIC IMPLIMENTATIONPROCEDURE (GIP)
3. NMPC Letter to NRC, File Code NMP1L 1044, dated March 11, 1996 Remarks:

NONE Confirmation Required (Yes/ No): No Final Issue Status File Location Operations Acceptance See Page(s):

(APP/FIO/VOI):APP (Gale/Hold): Gale Required(Yes/No): No Evaluation Number(s) / Revision: NR Copy ofApplicabilityReview Attached (Yes / N/R)?N/R Component ID(s) / EPN(s) / Line Number(s):

NA Key Words: NMP-1, STRUCTURAL, SQUG, SEISMIC VERIFICATION,CABLETRAYSUPPORT FORMAT0 NEP-DES48-F0140 970S070iM 9707M

PDR, ADOG(tt 05000220 PDR t

r V

HT NIAGARA IiIJ MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET Page Z (Next~~I Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit:

1 Disposition:

Ortgtnator ate ef.

Checker/Date Catcuhtton No.

Revfslon M

7-'I-'l7 SO.OSQUGLAR1 00 PURPOSE:

Document the LimitingAnalytical Review (LAR) evaluation for a typical Reactor Building cable tray support having a cast in-place cast iron insert as a anchor to the underside of the 281 foot elevation concrete slab.

This LAR has been prepared as part ofthe commitment to use the SQUG (GIP) methodology to document the seismic adequacy of cable tray supports.

CONCLUSION: This cable support meets the GIP requirements.

ATTACHMENTS A. LARfor a cable tray support having cast iron inserts.

FORMAT¹ NEP-DES48, Rev. 01 (F02)

El Y N1AGARA lLU MOHAWK NUCLEAR ENGINEERING CALCULATIONCONTINUATIONSHEET Page ~A (Next~

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Originator/Date ef.

Unit:

1 Checker/Date Disposition:

Caicuhtion No.

SO.OSQUGLAR1 Revhion 00 ATTACHMENTA LIMITINGANALYTICALREVIEW EVALUATION¹1 DISPOSITION OF QSMITTAL ACCEPTED ACCEPTED WITH CHANGES NNED Q NOT ACCEPTED 0 REVISE 5 RE 8

IT SIGNATURE:

DATE:Z-<<~

UNT.e/

REVlBNEO

>T/gc~zgE:~

A~~4 I NIAGARAIi/iag+gtPggfg CORPORNION NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DEI%RTI%NF FORMAT¹ NEP-DES@8, Rev. 01 (F02)

STEVENSON

&ASSOCIATES SUBJECT JOB ND 95C 277l sHEETJ!iMOF3 0

ol db 1

S,C, /-I-0 5

I 0 Sl<

R 2

~

4 Z

4 i

A 0 2.

SaA OB NO.

91C2771 ALCULATION:

C406 heetAf.3 of evislon 0

STEVENSON &ASSOCIATES Ine I@I!e Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited a structural-mechanical nalytlcal Review consulting engineering firm Dead Load Check LAR¹1 ATTACHMENT CALC NO REVISION PAGE NO The worst case is member 4 - unistrut P1000.

For L=36" unistrut capacity = 1130 Ib (Ref. 6.2, page 5) 1130 Ib > 278 Ib Hence the unistrut is OK.

(1/2" threaded rod)

Load per one rod:

(150+ 140+ 150+ 278) x 0.50 = 718 x 0.5 = 360 Ib Max safe load = 7670 Ib 7670 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the vertical member is OK.

Capacity of cast iron inserts = 1360 Ib (Ref. 6.6, page 6) 1360 Ib > 360 Ib Hence the inserts are OK.

SF = 1360/360 = 3.78

/

Vertical Capacity Check 360 x 3 = 1080 Ib < 1360 Ib OK SF = 1360 / 1080 = 1.26 DuctilityCheck This support is considered ductile (see Ref. 6.4, 8.3.3 for Rod Hanger Trapeze Supports).

Lateral Load Check No lateral load check is required since the support is ductile (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.4).

Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluation Support resonant frequency (Ref. 6.4, 8.3.5):

1 Ks 1

5't4 fsup==

= 0.84 Hz where 2m Ms 2n 186 W= 360 x 2 = 720 Ib (total dead weight on the pair of rod supports) g = 386.4 in/sec

88,A STEVENSON &ASSOCIATES a structural-mechanical consulting engineering firm OB NO.

91C2771 ALCULATION:

C406 Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited nalytical Review hect III 9 of It.

evision 0

y:

KC ol)II/9'I heck: ~.C, f-II-'IY LAR¹1 ATTACHMENT REVISION PAGE NO See attached comparison of Floor Response Spectra to Rod Fatigue Bounding Spectra (RB 281).

Use 0.5 g and go to Fig. 8-12 of Ref. 6.4.

At L = 32" the maximum acceptable weight is > 2.2 k. This is far above 720 Ib applied to both rods.

Hence fatigue capacity is OK.

Conclusion

(

This support meets the GIP requirements.

E = 29x10'psi (elastic modulus of steel)

I = 0.05x0.406

=%36x10 in (moment of inertia of rod root section, d = 0.406 per page 4-147 of Ref. 6.1))

L= 32" (length of rod above top tier) 12EI W

12x29x10 xt36x10 720 Ks=2 3

+=2

+

= 514 Ibfin L

L 32'2 720 2

~

Ms=

=186 Ib-sec /in 386.4

SBA JOB NO. 93C2771 CALCULATION: C-006 SHEET ¹ Ig OF 19 STEVENSON Nine Mile'Point Unit 1 Raceway Limited 8i ASSOCIATES Analytical Review a structural-mechanical consulting engineering firm Revision 0 By /Qa/-~He Chk. Kc e>

zv yy 6.0 References A'rTACHMENr Qt,C RP REVISfpN PAGE Np 6.1.

"Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL, 1989.

6.2.

"General Engineering Catalog", No. 10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation, Wayne, MI, 1983.

6.3.

"Design Response Spectra for Nine MilePoint Unit 1, Reactor Building and Turbine Building, Stevenson &Associates, February 1992, 6.4.

"Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification ofNuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification UtilityGroup.

6.5.

A-46 GIP Walkdown Notes, 1993.

I

.6 "Development of Load Capacities ofCast Iron Inserts and Q-Decking at Nine MilePoint Unit'",

Stevenson &Associates, Project No. 92C2757, January 1993.

I I

6.7 "Formulas for Natural Frequency and Mode Shape", R. D. Blevins, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979.

6.8 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, Nine MilePoint Unit 1, Drawing No. C-1533~.

6.9 Globe Strut Catalogue G443, Rev. 9/89, G. S. Metals, 6.10 T. J. Cope Catalogue or Power Strut Catalogue ¹20-3R, 1973.

'I)

P 0'l