ML17306A559: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000482/2017407]]
| number = ML17306A559
| issue date = 11/02/2017
| title = NRC Reactive Inspection Report 05000482/2017407, and Preliminary Greater than Green Finding EA-17-149
| author name = Vegel A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS
| addressee name = Heflin A
| addressee affiliation = Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp
| docket = 05000482
| license number = NPF-042
| contact person =
| case reference number = EA-17-149
| document report number = IR 2017407
| document type = Inspection Report, Letter
| page count = 4
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000482/2017407]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
                                        November 2, 2017
EA-17-149
Mr. Adam C. Heflin, President,
Chief Executive Officer,
and Chief Nuclear Officer
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
P.O. Box 411
Burlington, KS 66839
SUBJECT: WOLF CREEK GENERATING STATION, NRC REACTIVE INSPECTION
              REPORT 05000482/2017407, AND PRELIMINARY GREATER THAN GREEN
              FINDING
Dear Mr. Heflin:
On August 17, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed its initial
assessment of the circumstances surrounding the security event identified on August 11, 2017,
at the Wolf Creek Generating Station. Based on this initial assessment, the NRC sent a
physical security inspector to Wolf Creek Generating Station on August 21, 2017. On
October 4, 2017, the NRC completed its special inspection and the inspector discussed the
results of the inspection with Mr. S. Smith, Plant Manager, and other members of your staff.
The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed inspection report.
The enclosed report documents a finding, with an associated apparent violation, that the NRC
has preliminarily determined to have a greater than very low security significance that may
require additional inspections, regulatory actions, and oversight. We assessed the significance
of each finding using the Baseline Security Significance Determination Process using best
available information. The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for, and the
plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the
scope of the inspection before the inspectors left the site. We are considering escalated
enforcement for the apparent violation in accordance with our Enforcement Policy, which can be
found at http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/enforce-pol.html. Because we
have not made a final determination, no notice of violation is being issued at this time. Please
be aware that further NRC review may prompt us to modify the number and characterization of
the apparent violations.
We intend to issue our final significance determination and enforcement decision, in writing,
within 90 days from the date of this letter. The NRCs significance determination process is
designed to encourage an open dialogue between your staff and the NRC; however, neither the
                                                            Enclosure transmitted herewith
                                                            contains SUNSI. When separated
                                                            from enclosure, this transmittal
                                                            document is decontrolled.
                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
 
                  OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
A. Heflin                                        2
dialogue nor the written information you provide should affect the timeliness of our final
determination.
Before we make the final decision, you may choose to communicate your position on the facts
and assumptions used to arrive at the finding and assess its significance by either (1) attending
and presenting at a regulatory conference or (2) submitting your position in writing. The focus of
a regulatory conference is to discuss the significance of the finding. Written responses should
reference the inspection report number and enforcement action number associated with this
letter in the subject line.
If you request a regulatory conference, it should be held within 40 days of your receipt of this
letter. Please provide information you would like us to consider or discuss within 10 days prior
to the conference in an effort to make the conference more efficient and effective. If you choose
to attend a regulatory conference, it will be closed for public observation since security-related
information will be discussed. If you choose not to request a regulatory conference or to submit
a written response, you relinquish your right to appeal the final SDP determination, in that by not
doing either, you fail to meet the appeal requirements stated in the Prerequisite and Limitations
sections of Attachment 2 of NRC Inspection Manual Chapter 0609.
If you decide to submit a written response, it should be sent to the NRC within 40 days of your
receipt of this letter. Written responses should be clearly marked as a Response to an
Apparent Violation; EA-17-149 and should include for the apparent violation: (1) the reason for
the apparent violation or, if contested, the basis for disputing the apparent violation; (2) the
corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved; (3) the corrective steps that will
be taken; and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Your written response should be sent to the NRCs Document Control Center, Washington,
DC 20555-0001, with a copy mailed to Mr. Anton Vegel, Director, Division of Reactor Safety,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV, 1600 E. Lamar Blvd., Arlington,
TX 76011-4511, within 40 days of the date of this letter. If an adequate response is not
received within the time specified or an extension of time has not been granted by the NRC, the
NRC will proceed with its enforcement decision or schedule a regulatory conference.
Please contact Mr. Jeremy Groom at 817-200-1527, and in writing, within 10 days from the
issue date of this letter to notify the NRC of your intentions. If we have not heard from you
within 10 days, we will continue with our significance determination.
One cross-cutting aspect was assigned to the finding in the area of human performance.
Specifically, leaders failed to ensure that personnel and procedures were available and
adequate to support nuclear safety [H.1].
If you disagree with this cross-cutting aspect assignment, you should provide a response within
30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis of your disagreement, to the
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington,
DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident
Inspector at the Wolf Creek Generating Station.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, of the NRCs
Rules of Practice and Procedure, a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public
inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room and in the NRC's Agencywide Documents
                  OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
 
                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
A. Heflin                                      3
Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
However, the enclosed report contains Security-Related Information, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security
vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available for public
inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or in ADAMS. If you choose to provide a
response that contains Security-Related Information, please mark your entire response
Security-Related Information-Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in
10 CFR 2.390(b)(1). The NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii).
                                                Sincerely,
                                                /RA/
                                                Anton Vegel, Director
                                                Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-482
License No. NPF-42
Nonpublic Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000482/2017407
w/Attachments:
1. Supplemental Information
2. Special Inspection Charter
cc w/enclosure:
Mr. Mike Skiles
Security Manager
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation
P.O. Box 411
Burlington, KS 66839
cc w/o enclosure: Electronic Distribution
                OFFICIAL USE ONLY - SECURITY-RELATED INFORMATION
 
 
ML17306A548
Entire Report:            ADAMS:          Non-Publicly Available      Non-Sensitive    Keyword:
SUNSI Review By: ADM  Yes  No          Publicly Available          Sensitive _______MD 3.4 A.3
ADAMS ACCESSION NUMBER: ML17306A559
Cover Letter Only:        ADAMS:          Non-Publicly Available      Non-Sensitive    Keyword:
SUNSI Review By: ADM  Yes  No          Publicly Available          Sensitive        NRC-002
OFFICE          PSI:PSB1      PSI:PSB1      C:PSB1            C:PBB        TL:ACES          D:DRS
NAME            AMeyen        CJewett      JGroom            NTaylor      MVasquez        AVegel
SIGNATURE        /RA/          /RA/          /RA/              DP for      JK for          /RA/
DATE            10/23/17      10/5/17      10/23/17          10/26/17    11/01/17        11/2/17
}}

Latest revision as of 01:45, 8 January 2025

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17306A559&oldid=5082282"