ML14071A078: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
#REDIRECT [[ML14071A074]]
| number = ML14071A078
| issue date = 02/20/2014
| title = Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562
| author name =
| author affiliation = Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Inc
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR
| docket = 05000348
| license number =
| contact person =
| case reference number = NL-14-0249
| document type = Report, Technical
| page count = 56
}}
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 7 UNIT 1 -SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS) (Version 2.0)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Page 1 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YO NCI Ur-Fl- 00q Seosmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QICIIEOOO4B Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121' Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorag I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified on 8/23/12 per SEWS packagedated 04/1994 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified on 8/23/12 per SEWS pack.gedated 04/1994 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YM NO YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO NIAO YIN NO UO NIAO YI NO UO N/Al YO NO UO' Enter dhe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 2 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. OICIIEO004B Equip. Class, I.2.Equipment Description REACTOR- TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YO NE UDl Interaction Efrects 7. Are soft targets frce from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overhead equipment is adequately supported and judged not to present an adverse seismic condition.
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All Internal and external lines have adequate flexibility to not cause a seismic concern.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?IPEEE vulnerability of possible interatlon with an adjacent cabinet has been resolved by bolting the cabinets together.YO NO UlO N/AO YO NO UO NIA"NO Ul N/AD Y0 NO UO Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NO Ur adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All mounting hardware appears to be Intact and in good condition.
No adverse seismic concerns were noted.ComMents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
External inspection and anchorage verification performed on 8123/12-Internals Inpection performed 10//13.Evaluated by: BSan Nelson , ,.--Nikdle Arrant Date: 10/9/13 110913 Page 3 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-004 (Q1CllEOOO4B)
Sheet 3 of 3 Page 4 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QE110=Q3594B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI U-]Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YD NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO U0 N/AIQ YO NO UO N/AQ Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI UOI N/AQl Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 YI- NO UO N/AS YO NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 5 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YO ND UE-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID Na. Q1ElIL03594B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description CTMTSUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NEI UDI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment.
distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj@ N3 U3 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO Nrl Ur' N/AD YO NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
: 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YOl ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SA T originally on 9/10/12.Final wagcdown performed to Inspect cabinet internals.
Area Walk-by in folder F1 -48 Date: 1&913 Page 6 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 7 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 8 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ NE U" Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8701B Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHR INLET INSOLATION VAL1V Location:
Bldg. CTMT Floor El. 105' Room, Area 105' INSIDE BIOSHIELD Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inline Component
-No anchorage 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Inline Component
-No anchorage 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Inline Component
-No anchorage 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Inline Component
-No anchorage 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Inline Component
-No anchorage 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO YO NEI UO N/AO YO NO UO NIAO YIO NO UD N/AO YO NO UO NWAR YO NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 9 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y NO uE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEl1MOV8701B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description MHR INLET INSOLATiON VALVE Interaction Effets 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No soft targets were Identified that could be Impacted by nearby equipment or structures.
YO NO UD N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
A#l overhead equipment is supported adequately and no seismic concerns were noted.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?No conditions were identified which would result in a potentially adverse seismic condition.
YO NO UO N/AD YO NO U-Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No other adverse seismic conditions were noted.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk By performed in conjunction with this SWC for Containment 105' Elevation.
Walkdown and SWC performed on 9/30/13 has been retyped and re-signed for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian N4eon .Nikole ArrantgQ'f
'I Date: //ZOO Page 10 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-008 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 11 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-008 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 12 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0..-3C..Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YO N[ U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIHI 1NGASC2506C Equip.Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS-CABI NET C Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/21/12 against SEWS for Q2H1 INGASC2506D, C, and 02H1 1NGPIC2505A (Unit 2 Counter Part).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum is being performed to inspect cabinet internals.
YO NO UO N/AO YO NO Ur N/AC YO NE UO N/AC YO NEI UC N/AD YO NO Ur I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 13 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YO NEI Ur]Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No. OIHIINASC25 Equip.EquipmentDescription AU S-AFEGUARD$
CA8 NETC Interuction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YE3 NO UC] N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment.
distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YC9 N[ U13 N/Ar'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO3 U[ N/AD YO N3 U1-I Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
A cable and a spare cable was Identified to be secured to existing ternirnal blocks. The ltrminal blocks were determined to be spares containing no active wiing and adequately mounted to the cabinetL AdditonaIf, the cables were not in contact with any other equipent other than spares. Condition Is evaluted as OK by SWEs.Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 8/21/12 QIH1 1NGNASC25O6C contained IPEEE Seismic Outfisem These outliers were 1.) potential Interaction from overhead light, and 2.) potential interaction from panels OSHi 1NGR2504, QSHI 1NGH2514-AB and QIHI 1NGSS2504.
The outlier resolution was to restrain the overhead light and bolt the adjacent panels together.
The light was judged to be adequately restrained and aNl panels have been bolted together.
IPEEE outlier Is confirmed to be resolved.Cabinet Internals inspected on 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditions have been noted.Page 14 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Evaluated by: Ryan HArlo fise Tni'Ior YoungbhmYd Date: 1 I I Page 15 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 16 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 17 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 18 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri 0 n3l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Yo NEI Ut]Equipment ID No. Q1H11NG02504J Equip. Class' 2Q Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET J Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Nole: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration verified on &/28/12 per SEWS package dated 5/26/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO U" N/AD YO NO UiD N/AD YO NO UO N/AC]YO NO UU1 N/AO"N UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 19 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIHI1NGB2504J Equip. Class' 20.Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINETJ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lightinj and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Many of the 7300 cards have recently been replaced.
All mounting hardware (screws, nuts, bolts, eto) are In good conditon.
Al cables ha adequate flex.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
This item was noted as an IPEEE outlier for unrestrained overhead fig, the structure Independently from the ceiling tile system and is judgi Watcdown and SWC orginaly performed on 8/9/13 and has been retyl Evaluated by: Taylor Younoblood "L .? -( 1 Bria,, Nelso- r _v Page 20 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-037 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 21 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS F1-037 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0..-Sheet 4 of 4.,-r Page 22 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Fl-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QiH1 1NAGNIS2503A Equip. Class, Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 4 Sheet 1 of.W'f 1Status: YO N[ UO 20 INET Location:
Bldg. A=IARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorape i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YIN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/21/12 against SEWS for Q I 1NGNIS2503A and 02H1 INGNIS2503A
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum Is being performed to inspect cabinet Internals.
YO NO3 UD N/AO-Yl Ni3 UO N/AQ-YO NO Ur- N/AO YO N[3 UI- N/AO YO NEI UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 23 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH 11NGNIS25I3A Equip. Class Equipment Description NIS EXCORE DETECTOR CAB NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 -Sheet2oD"X' v.,q"q Status: Y0 NE UD'20 INET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO U0 NIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and fighting, YO NO U[ N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO U- N/AD YO NOE Ur Other Adverse Condition 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet Internals were Inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.
All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic conditon.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 8/21/12. IPEEE Outlier was vedfied to be resolved during 8/21/12 wakdown.Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to Inspect cabinet internals.
No adverse seismic conditions noted.Evaluated by: Rvan Harlos f Taylr Yowwbl"ood a-get Date: 44I-4--Page 24 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet,4'ofA'
'* aLq Page 25 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee!;oV / .%a -4 Page 26 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sbeetlotg~ir 1*dqýPage 27 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1.I- tjc>Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NO Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.
Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CABINETCHANNEL 2 Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anhorage verfied to be consistent on 8/21/12 against SEWS for QIH1 INGPIC2505F, QIH1 INAGPIC2505H, and QIHI 1NOSSP250WJ.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verfied SAT on 8/21/12. SWC Addendum is being perfomed to inspect cabinet internals.
YO NO U[3 N/AO3 YO NO U[3 N/AO YO NO UO N/Ar'YO NO UO N/AF1 YS NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 28 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Yo NO U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH11NGPIC2505F Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description PROCESS CONTROL CAWINET.CHANNEL 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO UD N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y18 NO Ur- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO U[ N/A[Q YO NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YOl NO3 UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed All internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 8/21/12.Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to inspect cabinet internals.
No adverse seismic conditions have been noted.Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos e;ýýTavlor Youngblohw
: j. 1.od Date: 12h Page 29 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 30 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 31 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 32 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Yl NO uiO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH11NGR25041 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Location:
Bldg. ALIILLARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorafe 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
No adverse seismic conditions were noted dunng the Inspection.
YO NOI U- N/AO YO NO Un N/Al YCK NO UI N/AD YO NO UI NIA0 YO NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 33 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI UI-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIH11NGR25041 Equip. Class'Equipment Description RADIATION MONITOR PANEL 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO U[3 N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[3 N/AQ]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIM NOI U-I NIAQ Y1@ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yl NO U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet Internals were inspected and no missing fasteners were observed AN Internal connections and routed cables have been determined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.
CommeLnIL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 8/21/12. IPEEE Outler verified to be resolved on 8/21112.Final Walkdown performed on 1/7/13 to inspect cabinet internals.
No adverse seismic conditions noted Evaluated by: PRsn Hsrlos Tailrc Eoungblood Date: a i IF/Page 34 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 4-j Page 35 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 36 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1H1INGSSP2506G Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Sheet i of 3 Status: Y[ NEI Ur-Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YN N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuration verified on 8/21/12 per SEWS package dated 5/25&94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NOI U- N/AC YO NOI U" N/AI YO NO U- N/A-YO NO U- N/A-YO NO U']I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 37 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-'oq7-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: Y0 NO uED Equipment ID No. O1HU1NGSSP2506G Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO Ul- N/AD-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO U[3 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UO N/AONO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AN mounting hardware (screws% bolts, nuts, eta) Is intact and in good condition.
This Item was noted as an IPEEE outlier for unrestrained overhead light. AU lighting is suspended from the structure independently from the ceiling tile system and is Judged to be adequate.
Other vulnerability (adjacent cabinet) Is addressed In SWC performed 8/21/12.Walkdown and SWC originally performed 9/19/13 and has been retyped for clarity.Evaluated by: Brian Nelson ..Nikole Arratt dý-Date: -111611V 1 I'D Wlq Page 38 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-042 Sheet 3 of 3 I Page 39 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: Y0 NO ur Ft-- 43 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH21EO05 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description 4.16tKV SWITCHGEAR IG LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 233 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Cheddist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorase i. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using SEWS for Q1H21EO05, dated 5/25194. The anchorage was verified to match Attachment A of the SEWS which documents the previously evaluated anchorage configuration.
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN NO Ur N/AO YI@ NO UI N/An YO NO UO N/AI YO NO Ur N/AONO UI I Enter Mhe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 40 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NrO u-[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01H21E005 Equip. Class', 9 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1G LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO U0- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl N[3 U[3 N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO N[3 Url N/An YO NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 ND UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed originally on 8/22/12. Second performance being performed to inspect cabinet intemals and perform anchorage verification.
Cabinet Internals inspected and anchorage verification completed on 1/7/13. No adverse seismic conditions noted.Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos E 4 E _¶Tavlor Youneblood
.1 q'U00 Date: I/I-ie 1 1o I #Page 41 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet q of 6 Page 42 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Page 43 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Page 44 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Page 45 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: Y0 NO U"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)I=I -.94%Equipment ID No. 0IH21E505 Equip. Class, .20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR WJ LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. DIEM Floor El. 15.5 Room, Area W56C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Ancborage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YC§ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS dated 5/2611994 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using SEWS for 0 1 H21E505, dated 5/2W/4.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y0 NO1 U1 N/AQ YO ND UD N/AQ YZ N[3 UO N/An YO NOI Un N/Arl YO N[l UQ' Enaer Mhe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 46 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01H21E505 Equip. Class'_2 -Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR WJ LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Conduit <11/8 from side of panel. Was identified during IPEEE walkdown and the cabinet was restrained to prevent impact therefore condition is SAT. See SWC from 10/25/12 for further details.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO UO NIAO Y09 Nil UQ NIAO YO NO UO NIAQ YO Ni UO Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NOI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed odginally on 10/25/12.
Second performance being performed to inspect cabinet internals and perform anchorage verification.
Cabinet Internals inspected and anchorage verification performed on 11/713. No adverse seismic conditions noted.-f , Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Taylor Yogn,6biood ldJae 4 O-Date: I't Page 47 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Page 48 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 49 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet s of s Page 50 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-Ots&#xfd;Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of 6 Status: YN NEI U[]Equipment ID No. QIH21E506 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1K LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188' Room. Area 72E Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorave 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.. is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified to be consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24/94.2. Is the anchorage free of bent. broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Y0 NO YO NEI Ur3 N/AONOI Url N/Arl 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NOI Ur N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO Uo N/AO YO NO Ut3' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 51 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YO N_ UiJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH21ES06 Equip. Class', 20 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IK LOCAL CONT PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO N[3 UO3 N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NOl U[3 N/AO-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO NO UO N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All cables have adequate flex. All mounting hardware Is Intact and appears in good condition.
No adverse seismic conditions were noted.Comaalfts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Etemr Inspection performed 8/24/12. IPEEE outlfIer confirmed to be resolved during Inital walkdow.r Second walkdown to Inspect Internals performed on 10/16/13 found no adverse seismic conditions.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson g$':-Nikole Arrant Date: 10W16/13 10/16113 Page 52 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (QIH21E506)
Sheet 3 of 6 Page 53 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (Q1H21ES06)
Sheet 4 of 6 Page 54 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-045 (QIH21ESO6)
Sheet 5 of 6 Page 55 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-045 (Q1H21E5O)
Sheet 6 of 6 Page 56 of 217}}

Revision as of 17:34, 15 September 2019

Redirect to:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A078&oldid=1889271"