Regulatory Guide 1.129: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY.
{{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION                                                                                                     April 1977
 
0                                     REGULATORY GUIDE
COMMISSION
                                      OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
April 1977 0 REGULATORY  
                                                                        REGULATORY GUIDE 1.129 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, AND REPLACEMENT OF LARGE LEAD
GUIDE OFFICE OF STANDARDS  
                                            STORAGE BATTERIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
DEVELOPMENT
REGULATORY  
GUIDE 1.129 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, AND REPLACEMENT  
OF LARGE LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES  
FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS  


==A. INTRODUCTION==
==A. INTRODUCTION==
27, 1975. It was subsequently approved and designated N41.15-1976 by the American National Criterion  
27, 1975. It was subsequently approved and designated N41.15-1976 by the American National Criterion 18, "Inspection and Testing of Electric                                       Standards Institute on January 8, 1976.
18, "Inspection and Testing of Electric Standards Institute on January 8, 1976.Power Systems," of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part The. provisions of the standiard include 50, "Licensing of Production and Utilization maintenance, test schedules, testin r$.,'.edures, and Facilities," requires that electric power systems im- replacement criteria for large lead storagc batteries.


po~rtant to safety be designed with a capability to test The standard does not inclu i,,.survei0lajnce and periodically the operability and functional perfor- testing of the d.c. system. evaethb gh thehbattery is mance of the components of the systems, such as on- part of that system. This stadaitd.ontums require.site power sources. Criterion XI, "test Control," of ments indicated by th' verb "hall"'and recommen-Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear dations indicated,,by'tki Verb "'should." Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50 requires that a test program be es- .. REB,46LATORY
Power Systems," of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part                                               The. provisions of the standiard include
POSITION tablished to ensure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and compo- Coiforrrancewth the requirements and recoi-nents will perform satisfactorily in service is iden- mende'ibns t'fithc maintenance.
    50, "Licensing of Production and Utilization                                                maintenance, test schedules, testin                                      r$.,'.edures, and Facilities," requires that electric power systems im-                                         replacement criteria for large lead storagc batteries.


testing. and replace-tified and performed in accordance with written test .rnt&YOrge ead storage batteries for nuclear power procedures that incorporate the requirements and ac- are specified by IEEE .Std 450.1975, ceptance limits contained in applicable design doju-' IEEE" Recommended Practice for Maintenance.
po~rtant to safety be designed with a capability to test                                     The standard does not inclu i,,.survei0lajnce and periodically the operability and functional perfor-                                         testing of the d.c. system. evaethb gh thehbattery is mance of the components of the systems, such as on-                                         part of that system. This stadaitd.ontums require.


ment
site power sources. Criterion XI, "test Control," of                                        ments indicated by th' verb "hall"'and recommen- Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear                                          dations indicated,,by'tki Verb "'should."
    Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10
    CFR Part 50 requires that a test program be es-                                                                  .. REB,46LATORY POSITION
    tablished to ensure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and compo-                                                  Coiforrrancewth the requirements and recoi- nents will perform satisfactorily in service is iden-                                        mende'ibns t'fithc maintenance. testing. and replace- tified and performed in accordance with written test .rnt&YOrge                                                            ead storage batteries for nuclear power procedures that incorporate the requirements and ac-                                        p:.l*anitsý,ýi'hjit are specified by IEEE .Std 450.1975, ceptance limits contained in applicable design doju-'                                          IEEE" Recommended Practice for Maintenance.


====s. Paragraph ====
ments. Paragraph 50.34(b)(6) of 10 CFR Part 50 re-                                           Te*iing and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Bat- quires that the final safety analysis report 1inct*de                                    :,*¢teries for Generating Stations and Substations,'
50.34(b)(6)  
    among other things, plans for conductCof norrmiI1. ': provides an adequate basis for complying with the re- operations, including maintenance, sur;illance,,-and                                          quirements of the Commission's regulations with periodic testing of structures, systems, a~no'do*mpo-                                        respect to the maintenance, testing. and replacement nents. This regulatory guide describes a mreti'ld ac-                                        of large lead storage batteries, subject to the follow- ceptable to the NRC staf. for performing the                                                  ing:
of 10 CFR Part 50 re- and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Bat-quires that the final safety analysis report 1 for Generating Stations and Substations,'
    maintenance, testing, auiid replacement of large lead storage batteries for all ty".e6f.iiclet'r power plants.                                          I. The battery service test discussed in Subsection
among other things, plans for conductC of norrmiI1.
                                - -4.3,                                                                  "Service," and described in Subsection 5.6, "Ser-
                                ý B. DISCU SION                                                  vice Test Description," should be performed with the
                              .'. '          .intervals                                                            between tests in accordance with Regulatory IEEE**td 450:'-j 7,"IEEE Recommended Prac-                                              Guide 1.32, "Criteria for Safety-Related Electric tice for NWitenance, Testing and Replacement of                                              Power Systems for Nuclear Power Plants." In addi- Large Lead"Siprage Batteries for Generating Stations                                          tion, if the system design is changed so that the and Substati~ns," dated May 29, 1975, was prepared                                            previous service test is no longer a valid test of the by the Working Group on Batteries, Station Design                                            capability oj the battery to meet the changed design Subcommittee, of the Power Generation Committee                                                'Copies ma)y be obtained from the Institute of IElectrical and and was approved by the Institute of Electrical and                                            Electronics Engineers, United Engineering Center. 345 E.'ta 47th Electronics Engineers Standards Board on February                                              Street, New York. New York 10017.


': provides an adequate basis for complying with the re-operations, including maintenance, sur;illance,,-and quirements of the Commission's regulations with periodic testing of structures, systems, respect to the maintenance, testing. and replacement nents. This regulatory guide describes a mret i'ld ac- of large lead storage batteries, subject to the follow-ceptable to the NRC staf. for performing the ing: maintenance, testing, auiid replacement of large lead storage batteries for all ty".e6f.iiclet'r power plants. I. The battery service test discussed in Subsection
USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES                                                Comment%          osuld be sent to Ih" S'c'*ey o( I tv! C,,,vnini,,,n.U. N,,O*m Flt,          n ,.
--4.3, "Service," and described in Subsection
    Regulatory Guides ate issued to descrtia anti make avaiable to the public methods          latury Comr.mion,           i$.ishinqiuon. D.C.   ?0555h. Atrll,,,m,     Ot~ckethJ    mntl -V',.'
5.6, "Ser-ý B. DISCU SION vice Test Description," should be performed with the.'. ' .intervals between tests in accordance with Regulatory450:'-j 7,"IEEE Recommended Prac- Guide 1.32, "Criteria for Safety-Related Electric tice for NWitenance, Testing and Replacement of Power Systems for Nuclear Power Plants." In addi-Large Lead"Siprage Batteries for Generating Stations tion, if the system design is changed so that the and Substati~ns," dated May 29, 1975, was prepared previous service test is no longer a valid test of the by the Working Group on Batteries, Station Design capability oj the battery to meet the changed design Subcommittee, of the Power Generation Committee
    acceptable to the NRC sltaf of imptlemnenting specific parts of the Conmism-on's            Stanch.
'Copies ma)y be obtained from the Institute of IElectrical and and was approved by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, United Engineering Center. 345 E.'ta 47th Electronics Engineers Standards Board on February Street, New York. New York 1001


===7. USNRC REGULATORY ===
tegulations, to delineate techniquei used by the staff in evaluating specific problems      The guides a      imruet in    he followviilg ten Itytt.t dtiviirmt:
GUIDES Comment% osuld be sent to I h" o( I tv! C,,,vnini,,,n.U. Flt, n ,.Regulatory Guides ate issued to descrtia anti make avaiable to the public methods latury Comr.mion, i$.ishinqiuon.
    Or tostulateM accidents. of to Provde guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides ate sot substltutes foe 'egulations. and compnhence with them is not required.              I. Power Reaclnts                                      G. Prrntfuci Metholds and solutions diflerent from those set out in the guides will be accet-t          2. Research and Teft Reacturs                            7. Tra*itsttatmr*o able it they ptovide a basis for the finding rtequisite to the Itsuance at continuance      3. Fuel%aond M.aterials Facifites                      a. OccspatonalI lt,JAl of a permit or license by the Commission.                                                  4. Envitonmenlal anti String                            9. Anltitust neview'y
  *    i  , n                b  ensd.a uoOwle.fineanidt                    cmset              5,es M      slo,     Plane Prtcin                    1.Gna t. Gental aft encouraged at of      5 Materials and Plant Protection Comments and suggestions for improvements In these gudes time, and gu.ides, will be revisedt, as aopDOtwilite. to accommodatle commren-ts and        Reqetslel for sing*le* copies t)l issued ,quid"P Iwh~rh may tie"                  r oelO(t flatI
                                                                                                                                                                                          O plic'-.
    to feallect new Info~rmaclot tie experience.    Havwe.vef. commentt on this guideoif        menn on' an automatic distribution hls for $inqllr tall estt III(ltlftti q~uides in specific:
      eecelved within about tw) tvmonths ,after,it issuance, will be' ereiatcular  useful In    divisionts should be malle in wtifinrl !a the US. Nu(dewfl nPeul~twa*y Connm,*&uu,,.
      Mlal I~ng the need lot aln early revision.                                                 Washington, D.C. 2*0555. Attentionl: Director, Divi%*kon of Documnent Contfeti.


D.C. ?0555h. Atrll,,,m, Ot~ckethJ
requirements of the system, the user should conduct            Except in those cases in which the applicant the service test for the new system design.                 proposes an acceptable alternative method for com- plying with specified portions of the Commission's
mntl -V',.'acceptable to the NRC sltaf of imptlemnenting specific parts of the Conmism-on's Stanch.tegulations, to delineate techniquei used by the staff in evaluating specific problems The guides a imr uet in he followviilg ten Itytt.t dtiviirmt:
    2. Section 8. 'Standards References." of IEEE Std      regulations, the method described herein will be used
Or tostulateM
450-1975 lists additional standards. The specific ap-        in the evaluation of submittals in connection with plicability or acceptability of these referenced stan-     construction permit applications docketed after dards has been or will be covered separately in other        December I. 1977. unless this guide is revised as a regulatory guides, where appropriate.                      result of suggestions from the public or additional staff review.
accidents.


of to Provde guidance to applicants.
==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
 
If an applicant wishes to use this regulator)y guide in developing submittals for applications docketed on The purpose of this section is to provide informa-      or before December I. 1977, the pertinent portions of tion to applicants regarding the NRC staffs plans for       the application will he evaluated on the basis of this using this regulatory guide.                               guide.
Regulatory Guides ate sot substltutes foe 'egulations.
 
and compnhence with them is not required.
 
I. Power Reaclnts G. Prrntfuci Metholds and solutions diflerent from those set out in the guides will be accet-t 2. Research and Teft Reacturs 7.
 
able it they ptovide a basis for the finding rtequisite to the Itsuance at continuance
3. Fuel% aond M.aterials Facifites
 
====a. OccspatonalI ====
lt,JAl of a permit or license by the Commission.
 
4. Envitonmenlal anti String 9. Anltitust neview'y* i , n 5,es M b ensd.a uoOwle.fineanidt cmset sl o, Plane Prtcin 1.Gna Comments and suggestions for improvements In these gudes aft encouraged at of 5 Materials and Plant Protection t. Gental time, and gu.ides, will be revisedt, as aopDOtwilite.
 
to accommodatle commren-ts and Reqetslel for copies t)l issued ,quid"P Iwh~rh may tie" oelO(t r flatI O plic'-.to feallect new Info~rmaclot tie experience.
 
Havwe.vef.


commentt on this guideoif menn on' an automatic distribution hls for $inqllr tall estt III(ltlftti q~uides in specific: eecelved within about tw) tvmonths ,after, it issuance, will be' ereiatcular useful In divisionts should be malle in wtifinrl !a the US. Nu(dewfl Mlal I~ng the need lot aln early revision.
-o WC  Z
    2          a
    0J
        ILn      o
    00
              4.


Washington, D.C. Attentionl:
w j 0
Director, of Documnent Contfeti.
    LU
 
            01
requirements of the system, the user should conduct the service test for the new system design.2. Section 8. 'Standards References." of IEEE Std 450-1975 lists additional standards.
                                                      1.129-2}}
 
The specific ap-plicability or acceptability of these referenced stan-dards has been or will be covered separately in other regulatory guides, where appropriate.
 
==D. IMPLEMENTATION==
The purpose of this section is to provide informa-tion to applicants regarding the NRC staffs plans for using this regulatory guide.Except in those cases in which the applicant proposes an acceptable alternative method for com-plying with specified portions of the Commission's regulations, the method described herein will be used in the evaluation of submittals in connection with construction permit applications docketed after December I. 1977. unless this guide is revised as a result of suggestions from the public or additional staff review.If an applicant wishes to use this regulator)y guide in developing submittals for applications docketed on or before December I. 1977, the pertinent portions of the application will he evaluated on the basis of this guide.-o WC Z 2 a 0J ILn o 00.4 w j 0 LU 01 1.129-2}}


{{RG-Nav}}
{{RG-Nav}}

Revision as of 10:17, 4 November 2019

Maintenance Testing, and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Batteries for Nuclear Power Plants
ML13350A268
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/30/1977
From:
NRC/OSD
To:
References
RG-1.129
Download: ML13350A268 (2)
v • d • e


U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION April 1977

0 REGULATORY GUIDE

OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT

REGULATORY GUIDE 1.129 MAINTENANCE, TESTING, AND REPLACEMENT OF LARGE LEAD

STORAGE BATTERIES FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

A. INTRODUCTION

27, 1975. It was subsequently approved and designated N41.15-1976 by the American National Criterion 18, "Inspection and Testing of Electric Standards Institute on January 8, 1976.

Power Systems," of Appendix A, "General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part The. provisions of the standiard include

50, "Licensing of Production and Utilization maintenance, test schedules, testin r$.,'.edures, and Facilities," requires that electric power systems im- replacement criteria for large lead storagc batteries.

po~rtant to safety be designed with a capability to test The standard does not inclu i,,.survei0lajnce and periodically the operability and functional perfor- testing of the d.c. system. evaethb gh thehbattery is mance of the components of the systems, such as on- part of that system. This stadaitd.ontums require.

site power sources. Criterion XI, "test Control," of ments indicated by th' verb "hall"'and recommen- Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear dations indicated,,by'tki Verb "'should."

Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants," to 10

CFR Part 50 requires that a test program be es- .. REB,46LATORY POSITION

tablished to ensure that all testing required to demonstrate that structures, systems, and compo- Coiforrrancewth the requirements and recoi- nents will perform satisfactorily in service is iden- mende'ibns t'fithc maintenance. testing. and replace- tified and performed in accordance with written test .rnt&YOrge ead storage batteries for nuclear power procedures that incorporate the requirements and ac- p:.l*anitsý,ýi'hjit are specified by IEEE .Std 450.1975, ceptance limits contained in applicable design doju-' IEEE" Recommended Practice for Maintenance.

ments. Paragraph 50.34(b)(6) of 10 CFR Part 50 re- Te*iing and Replacement of Large Lead Storage Bat- quires that the final safety analysis report 1inct*de  :,*¢teries for Generating Stations and Substations,'

among other things, plans for conductCof norrmiI1. ': provides an adequate basis for complying with the re- operations, including maintenance, sur;illance,,-and quirements of the Commission's regulations with periodic testing of structures, systems, a~no'do*mpo- respect to the maintenance, testing. and replacement nents. This regulatory guide describes a mreti'ld ac- of large lead storage batteries, subject to the follow- ceptable to the NRC staf. for performing the ing:

maintenance, testing, auiid replacement of large lead storage batteries for all ty".e6f.iiclet'r power plants. I. The battery service test discussed in Subsection

- -4.3, "Service," and described in Subsection 5.6, "Ser-

ý B. DISCU SION vice Test Description," should be performed with the

.'. ' .intervals between tests in accordance with Regulatory IEEE**td 450:'-j 7,"IEEE Recommended Prac- Guide 1.32, "Criteria for Safety-Related Electric tice for NWitenance, Testing and Replacement of Power Systems for Nuclear Power Plants." In addi- Large Lead"Siprage Batteries for Generating Stations tion, if the system design is changed so that the and Substati~ns," dated May 29, 1975, was prepared previous service test is no longer a valid test of the by the Working Group on Batteries, Station Design capability oj the battery to meet the changed design Subcommittee, of the Power Generation Committee 'Copies ma)y be obtained from the Institute of IElectrical and and was approved by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, United Engineering Center. 345 E.'ta 47th Electronics Engineers Standards Board on February Street, New York. New York 10017.

USNRC REGULATORY GUIDES Comment% osuld be sent to Ih" S'c'*ey o( I tv! C,,,vnini,,,n.U. N,,O*m Flt, n ,.

Regulatory Guides ate issued to descrtia anti make avaiable to the public methods latury Comr.mion, i$.ishinqiuon. D.C. ?0555h. Atrll,,,m, Ot~ckethJ mntl -V',.'

acceptable to the NRC sltaf of imptlemnenting specific parts of the Conmism-on's Stanch.

tegulations, to delineate techniquei used by the staff in evaluating specific problems The guides a imruet in he followviilg ten Itytt.t dtiviirmt:

Or tostulateM accidents. of to Provde guidance to applicants. Regulatory Guides ate sot substltutes foe 'egulations. and compnhence with them is not required. I. Power Reaclnts G. Prrntfuci Metholds and solutions diflerent from those set out in the guides will be accet-t 2. Research and Teft Reacturs 7. Tra*itsttatmr*o able it they ptovide a basis for the finding rtequisite to the Itsuance at continuance 3. Fuel%aond M.aterials Facifites a. OccspatonalI lt,JAl of a permit or license by the Commission. 4. Envitonmenlal anti String 9. Anltitust neview'y

  • i , n b ensd.a uoOwle.fineanidt cmset 5,es M slo, Plane Prtcin 1.Gna t. Gental aft encouraged at of 5 Materials and Plant Protection Comments and suggestions for improvements In these gudes time, and gu.ides, will be revisedt, as aopDOtwilite. to accommodatle commren-ts and Reqetslel for sing*le* copies t)l issued ,quid"P Iwh~rh may tie" r oelO(t flatI

O plic'-.

to feallect new Info~rmaclot tie experience. Havwe.vef. commentt on this guideoif menn on' an automatic distribution hls for $inqllr tall estt III(ltlftti q~uides in specific:

eecelved within about tw) tvmonths ,after,it issuance, will be' ereiatcular useful In divisionts should be malle in wtifinrl !a the US. Nu(dewfl nPeul~twa*y Connm,*&uu,,.

Mlal I~ng the need lot aln early revision. Washington, D.C. 2*0555. Attentionl: Director, Divi%*kon of Documnent Contfeti.

requirements of the system, the user should conduct Except in those cases in which the applicant the service test for the new system design. proposes an acceptable alternative method for com- plying with specified portions of the Commission's

2. Section 8. 'Standards References." of IEEE Std regulations, the method described herein will be used

450-1975 lists additional standards. The specific ap- in the evaluation of submittals in connection with plicability or acceptability of these referenced stan- construction permit applications docketed after dards has been or will be covered separately in other December I. 1977. unless this guide is revised as a regulatory guides, where appropriate. result of suggestions from the public or additional staff review.

D. IMPLEMENTATION

If an applicant wishes to use this regulator)y guide in developing submittals for applications docketed on The purpose of this section is to provide informa- or before December I. 1977, the pertinent portions of tion to applicants regarding the NRC staffs plans for the application will he evaluated on the basis of this using this regulatory guide. guide.

-o WC Z

2 a

0J

ILn o

00

4.

w j 0

LU

01

1.129-2


Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=Regulatory_Guide_1.129&oldid=2055399"