NRC Generic Letter 1980-89: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:w styREGs.t sEUNITED STATES UES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
{{#Wiki_filter:w   styREGs
COMMISSION
    .t                                                 STATES         UES
REGION I t R631 PARK AVENUE KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA  
                                                                    sEUNITED
19406 October 24, 1980 cl Docket No. 50-03 ti)Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas Vice President 4 Irving Place -New York, New York 10003 un Gentlemen:
                                  NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
The enclosed Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin 79-OiB, "Environmental Qualifica- tion of Class 1E Equipment," is forwarded to you for action. This supplement clarifies two issues raised by Supplement No. 2. These are (1) the submittal of qualification information for equipment resulting from TMI Action Plan requirements and (2) the qualification of equipment-which is required to achieve a cold shutdown condition.
                                                  REGION I
              t R631                             PARK AVENUE
                                    KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 October 24, 1980
                                                                            cl Docket No. 50-03                                                                   ti)
          Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.


This action is a result of industry feedback to NRC regarding interpretation of Supplement No. 2. The information presented is applicable to your submittal regarding environmental qualification of Class 1E equipment which is required by November 1, 1980.If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.Sincerely, yce H. Grier Director Enclosures:
ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas Vice President
1. Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin No. 79-01B 2. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins  
          4 Irving Place                                                      -
          New York, New York 10003                                            un Gentlemen:
          The enclosed Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin 79-OiB, "Environmental Qualifica- tion of Class 1E Equipment," is forwarded to you for action. This supplement clarifies two issues raised by Supplement No. 2. These are (1) the submittal of qualification information for equipment resulting from TMI Action Plan requirements and (2) the qualification of equipment-which is required to achieve a cold shutdown condition. This action is a result of industry feedback to NRC regarding interpretation of Supplement No. 2. The information presented is applicable to your submittal regarding environmental qualification of Class
          1E equipment which is required by November 1, 1980.
 
If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
 
Sincerely, yce H. Grier Director Enclosures:
          1. Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin No. 79-01B
          2. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins  


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
: S. 0. Ebneter (215-337-5283)
:   S. 0. Ebneter
cc w/encls: L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP Nuclear W. Monti, Manager -Nuclear Power Generation Department M. Shatkouski, Plant Manager J. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical Engineering W. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident Manager J. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President Administration Joyce P. Davis, Esquire 80 110703Y3 SSINS No.: 6820 A->~' Accession No.: 8008220248 IEB Sup #3 to 79-01B UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY  
                      (215-337-5283)
COMMISSION
          cc w/encls:
OFFICE OF INSPECTION  
          L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP Nuclear W. Monti, Manager - Nuclear Power Generation Department M. Shatkouski, Plant Manager J. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical Engineering W. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident Manager J. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President Administration Joyce P. Davis, Esquire
AND ENFORCEMENT
80 110703Y3
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 24, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 79-O0B Supplement No. 3: ENVIRONMENTAL  
 
QUALIFICATION  
SSINS No.: 6820
OF CLASS IE EQUIPMENT  
                                                  A->~' Accession No.:
                                                          8008220248 IEB Sup #3 to 79-01B
                                  UNITED STATES
                        NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                    OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
                          WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 24, 1980
IE Bulletin No. 79-O0B Supplement No. 3:   ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS
                                          IE EQUIPMENT


==Description of Circumstances==
==Description of Circumstances==
:
:
Two issues were raised by Supplement No. 2 which require clarification.
Two issues were raised by Supplement No. 2 which require clarification. These are: (1) the dates required for submittal of qualification information for TMI related equipment, and (2) whether the equipment required to achieve a Cold Shutdown condition must be environmentally qualified if the licensing basis for the plant was a Hot Safe Shutdown condition.
 
(1) Supplement No. 2 (Q.l, Q.5) addressed the minimum cold shutdown require- ments. The staff position on this issue is that the licensee must identify and environmentally qualify the equipment needed to complete one method (path) of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition. The equipment of other paths must be reviewed to assure that its failure will not aggravate or contribute to the accident (ref.
 
Q.5 Supp. No. 2).
    Due to an inconsistency between Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2, the staff position on this issue was unclear. Therefore, the following will apply:
    a.    The qualification information for equipment needed to achieve and maintain a Hot Safe Shutdown condition must be submitted not later than November 1, 1980.
 
b.    The qualification information for equipment required to achieve and maintain a Cold Shutdown condition (ref. Q.1 and Q.5 of Supplement No. 2) must be submitted not later than February 1, 1981.
 
(2) IEB 79-O1B required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April 1980.


These are: (1) the dates required for submittal of qualification information for TMI related equipment, and (2) whether the equipment required to achieve a Cold Shutdown condition must be environmentally qualified if the licensing basis for the plant was a Hot Safe Shutdown condition.
Supplement 1 (Feb. 1980) informed licensees that equipment which was
      "planned" to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has since been installed. Supplement No. 2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff posi- tion was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply:
      a.  Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment must be submitted by February 1, 1981.


(1) Supplement No. 2 (Q.l, Q.5) addressed the minimum cold shutdown require-ments. The staff position on this issue is that the licensee must identify and environmentally qualify the equipment needed to complete one method (path) of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition.
b.   Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.


The equipment of other paths must be reviewed to assure that its failure will not aggravate or contribute to the accident (ref.Q.5 Supp. No. 2).Due to an inconsistency between Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2, the staff position on this issue was unclear. Therefore, the following will apply: a. The qualification information for equipment needed to achieve and maintain a Hot Safe Shutdown condition must be submitted not later than November 1, 1980.b. The qualification information for equipment required to achieve and maintain a Cold Shutdown condition (ref. Q.1 and Q.5 of Supplement No. 2) must be submitted not later than February 1, 1981.(2) IEB 79-O1B required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April
NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementation review data.
1980.Supplement
1 (Feb. 1980) informed licensees that equipment which was"planned" to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be addressed in that response.


Some of this equipment has since been installed.
IEB 79-Ol Sup #3 October 24, 1980 c.  Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.


Supplement No. 2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff posi-tion was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed in the November 1, 1980 submittal.
d.   Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment not yet installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date.


This position represents no change in staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply: a. Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment must be submitted by February 1, 1981.b. Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementation review data.
The above items 1 and 2 represent no change in staff position regarding the scope of the 79-OlB Supplement 2 review.


IEB 79-Ol Sup #3 October 24, 1980 c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.d. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment not yet installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date.The above items 1 and 2 represent no change in staff position regarding the scope of the 79-OlB Supplement
IE Bulletin No. 79-OIB was issued under a blanket GAO clearance (8180225 (R0072), clearance expired July 31, 1980) specifically for identified generic problems. Supplement No. 3 to Bulletin 79-01B is for information, hence no GAO clearance is required.
2 review.IE Bulletin No. 79-OIB was issued under a blanket GAO clearance  
(8180225 (R0072), clearance expired July 31, 1980) specifically for identified generic problems.


Supplement No. 3 to Bulletin 79-01B is for information, hence no GAO clearance is required.
IE Bulletin No. 79-,<4B                                          Enclosure 2 Supplement No. 2 October 24, 1980
                                    RECENTLY ISSUED
                                    IE BULLETINS
Bulletin        Subject                      Date Issued  Issued To No.


IE Bulletin No. 79-,<4B Supplement No. 2 October 24, 1980 Enclosure
Supplement 3   Environmental Qualifica-       9/30/80   All holders of a to 79-O1B      tion of Class 1E                          power reactor Equipment                                  OL or CP
2 RECENTLY ISSUED IE BULLETINS Bulletin No.Subject Date Issued Issued To Supplement  
80-22           Automation Industries,         9/12/80   All holders of a Model 200-520-008                          radiography license
3 to 79-O1B Environmental tion of Class Equipment Qualifica-
80-21          (Not Used)
1E 9/30/80 All holders of a power reactor OL or CP 80-22 80-21 Automation Industries, Model 200-520-008
Revision 1     Boron Loss from                  8/29/80    All holders to 79-26       BWR Control Blades                         of a BWR power reactor OL
9/12/80 All holders of a radiography license (Not Used)Revision 1 to 79-26 Revision 1 to 80-19 Boron Loss from BWR Control Blades Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering
Revision 1    Failures of Mercury-             8/15/80    All holders of a to 80-19      Wetted Matrix Relays in                   power reactor Reactor Protective                         OL or CP
8/29/80 8/15/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL All holders of a power reactor OL or CP 80-20 80-19 Failures of Westinghouse Type 14-2 Spring Return to Neutral Control Switches Failures of Mercury-Wetted Matrix Relays in Reactor Protective Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering Maintenance of Adequate Minimum Flow Thru Centrifugal Charging Pumps Following Secondary Side High Energy Line Rupture 7/31/80 7/31/80 7/24/80 All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a power reactor OL or CP All holders of a PWR power reactor OL or CP 80-18 Supplement
                Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering
3 to 80-17 Supplement
80-20          Failures of Westinghouse        7/31/80   All holders of a Type 14-2 Spring Return to                 power reactor OL
2 to 80-17 Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR Failure of Control Rods to Insert During a Scram at a BWR 8/22/80 7/22/80 All holders of a BWR power reactor OL or CP All holders of a BWR power reactor OL}}
                Neutral Control Switches                   or CP
80-19          Failures of Mercury-           7/31/80    All holders of a Wetted Matrix Relays in                   power reactor OL
                Reactor Protective Systems                 or CP
                of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering
80-18          Maintenance of Adequate         7/24/80    All holders of a Minimum Flow Thru                         PWR power reactor Centrifugal Charging Pumps                 OL or CP
                Following Secondary Side High Energy Line Rupture Supplement 3    Failure of Control Rods        8/22/80   All holders of a to 80-17       to Insert During a                         BWR power reactor Scram at a BWR                             OL or CP
Supplement 2    Failure of Control Rods         7/22/80   All holders of a to 80-17      to Insert During a Scram                    BWR power reactor OL
              at a BWR}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 01:51, 24 November 2019

NRC Generic Letter 1980-089: Submittal of NRC Bulletin 1979-01B, Supplement 3: Environmental Qualification of Class IE Equipment
ML031350460
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/24/1980
From: Grier B
NRC Region 1
To:
References
BL-79-01B, Suppl 3 GL-80-089, NUDOCS 8011070343
Download: ML031350460 (4)


w styREGs

.t STATES UES

sEUNITED

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

t R631 PARK AVENUE

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406 October 24, 1980

cl Docket No. 50-03 ti)

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

ATTN: Mr. Peter Zarakas Vice President

4 Irving Place -

New York, New York 10003 un Gentlemen:

The enclosed Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin 79-OiB, "Environmental Qualifica- tion of Class 1E Equipment," is forwarded to you for action. This supplement clarifies two issues raised by Supplement No. 2. These are (1) the submittal of qualification information for equipment resulting from TMI Action Plan requirements and (2) the qualification of equipment-which is required to achieve a cold shutdown condition. This action is a result of industry feedback to NRC regarding interpretation of Supplement No. 2. The information presented is applicable to your submittal regarding environmental qualification of Class

1E equipment which is required by November 1, 1980.

If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.

Sincerely, yce H. Grier Director Enclosures:

1. Supplement No. 3 to IE Bulletin No.79-01B

2. List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins

CONTACT

S. 0. Ebneter

(215-337-5283)

cc w/encls:

L. 0. Brooks, Project Manager, IP Nuclear W. Monti, Manager - Nuclear Power Generation Department M. Shatkouski, Plant Manager J. M. Makepeace, Director, Technical Engineering W. D. Hamlin, Assistant to Resident Manager J. D. Block, Esquire, Executive Vice President Administration Joyce P. Davis, Esquire

80 110703Y3

SSINS No.: 6820

A->~' Accession No.:

8008220248 IEB Sup #3 to 79-01B

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 24, 1980

IE Bulletin No. 79-O0B Supplement No. 3: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS

IE EQUIPMENT

Description of Circumstances

Two issues were raised by Supplement No. 2 which require clarification. These are: (1) the dates required for submittal of qualification information for TMI related equipment, and (2) whether the equipment required to achieve a Cold Shutdown condition must be environmentally qualified if the licensing basis for the plant was a Hot Safe Shutdown condition.

(1) Supplement No. 2 (Q.l, Q.5) addressed the minimum cold shutdown require- ments. The staff position on this issue is that the licensee must identify and environmentally qualify the equipment needed to complete one method (path) of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition. The equipment of other paths must be reviewed to assure that its failure will not aggravate or contribute to the accident (ref.

Q.5 Supp. No. 2).

Due to an inconsistency between Supplement No. 1 and Supplement No. 2, the staff position on this issue was unclear. Therefore, the following will apply:

a. The qualification information for equipment needed to achieve and maintain a Hot Safe Shutdown condition must be submitted not later than November 1, 1980.

b. The qualification information for equipment required to achieve and maintain a Cold Shutdown condition (ref. Q.1 and Q.5 of Supplement No. 2) must be submitted not later than February 1, 1981.

(2) IEB 79-O1B required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April 1980.

Supplement 1 (Feb. 1980) informed licensees that equipment which was

"planned" to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has since been installed. Supplement No. 2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff posi- tion was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply:

a. Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment must be submitted by February 1, 1981.

b. Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.

NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementation review data.

IEB 79-Ol Sup #3 October 24, 1980 c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.

d. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment not yet installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date.

The above items 1 and 2 represent no change in staff position regarding the scope of the 79-OlB Supplement 2 review.

IE Bulletin No. 79-OIB was issued under a blanket GAO clearance (8180225 (R0072), clearance expired July 31, 1980) specifically for identified generic problems. Supplement No. 3 to Bulletin 79-01B is for information, hence no GAO clearance is required.

IE Bulletin No. 79-,<4B Enclosure 2 Supplement No. 2 October 24, 1980

RECENTLY ISSUED

IE BULLETINS

Bulletin Subject Date Issued Issued To No.

Supplement 3 Environmental Qualifica- 9/30/80 All holders of a to 79-O1B tion of Class 1E power reactor Equipment OL or CP

80-22 Automation Industries, 9/12/80 All holders of a Model 200-520-008 radiography license

80-21 (Not Used)

Revision 1 Boron Loss from 8/29/80 All holders to 79-26 BWR Control Blades of a BWR power reactor OL

Revision 1 Failures of Mercury- 8/15/80 All holders of a to 80-19 Wetted Matrix Relays in power reactor Reactor Protective OL or CP

Systems of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering

80-20 Failures of Westinghouse 7/31/80 All holders of a Type 14-2 Spring Return to power reactor OL

Neutral Control Switches or CP

80-19 Failures of Mercury- 7/31/80 All holders of a Wetted Matrix Relays in power reactor OL

Reactor Protective Systems or CP

of Operating Nuclear Power Plants Designed by Combustion Engineering

80-18 Maintenance of Adequate 7/24/80 All holders of a Minimum Flow Thru PWR power reactor Centrifugal Charging Pumps OL or CP

Following Secondary Side High Energy Line Rupture Supplement 3 Failure of Control Rods 8/22/80 All holders of a to 80-17 to Insert During a BWR power reactor Scram at a BWR OL or CP

Supplement 2 Failure of Control Rods 7/22/80 All holders of a to 80-17 to Insert During a Scram BWR power reactor OL

at a BWR

Template:GL-Nav