ML062150108: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:July 17, 2006Tennessee Valley Authority
{{#Wiki_filter:July 17, 2006
ATTN:Mr. Karl W. SingerChief Nuclear Officer and
Tennessee Valley Authority
  Executive Vice President6A Lookout Place
ATTN: Mr. Karl W. Singer
          Chief Nuclear Officer and
            Executive Vice President
6A Lookout Place
1101 Market Street
1101 Market Street
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801SUBJECT:BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013 AND 05000296/2006013Dear Mr. Singer:
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
On June 23, 2006, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection atyour Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection
SUBJECT:       BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INSPECTION REPORT
results, which were discussed on June 23, 2006, with Mr. B. O'Grady and other members of
              05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013 AND 05000296/2006013
your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety andcompliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.  
Dear Mr. Singer:
On June 23, 2006, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at
your Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection
results, which were discussed on June 23, 2006, with Mr. B. OGrady and other members of
your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and
compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed
personnel.Based on the results of this inspection no findings of significance were identified.
personnel.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and itsenclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public DocumentRoom or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.Sincerely,
Based on the results of this inspection no findings of significance were identified.
/RA/
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its
Brian R. Bonser, ChiefPlant Support Branch 2
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Division of Reactor SafetyDocket Nos. 50-259, 05-260, 50-296License No. DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68Enclosure: (See page 2)  
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system
TVA 2Enclosure:NRC Inspection Report 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, and05000296/2006013 w/Attachment: Supplemental Informationcc w/encl:Ashok S. Bhatnagar
(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-
rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
                                              Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
                                              Brian R. Bonser, Chief
                                              Plant Support Branch 2
                                              Division of Reactor Safety
Docket Nos. 50-259, 05-260, 50-296
License No. DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68
Enclosure: (See page 2)
 
TVA                                         2
Enclosure:     NRC Inspection Report 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, and
              05000296/2006013 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/encl:
Ashok S. Bhatnagar
Senior Vice President
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Operations
Nuclear Operations
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionLarry S. Bryant, Vice PresidentNuclear Engineering & Technical Services
Electronic Mail Distribution
Larry S. Bryant, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionBrian O'GradySite Vice President
Electronic Mail Distribution
Brian O'Grady
Site Vice President
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionPreston D. SwaffordSenior Vice President
Electronic Mail Distribution
Preston D. Swafford
Senior Vice President
Nuclear Support
Nuclear Support
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionGeneral CounselTennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail Distribution
Electronic Mail DistributionJohn C. Fornicola, ManagerNuclear Assurance and Licensing
General Counsel
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionBruce M. Aukland, Plant ManagerBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Electronic Mail Distribution
John C. Fornicola, Manager
Nuclear Assurance and Licensing
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionGlenn W. Morris, ManagerCorporate Nuclear Licensing
Electronic Mail Distribution
Bruce M. Aukland, Plant Manager
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail Distribution
Glenn W. Morris, Manager
Corporate Nuclear Licensing
and Industry Affairs
and Industry Affairs
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail Distribution(cc w/encl cont'd - See page 3)  
Electronic Mail Distribution
TVA 3(cc w/encl cont'd)William D. Crouch, M
(cc w/encl contd - See page 3)
anagerLicensing and Industry Affairs
 
TVA                             3
(cc w/encl contd)
William D. Crouch, Manager
Licensing and Industry Affairs
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
Electronic Mail DistributionState Health OfficerAlabama Dept. of Public Health
Electronic Mail Distribution
State Health Officer
Alabama Dept. of Public Health
RSA Tower - Administration
RSA Tower - Administration
Suite 1552
Suite 1552
P. O. Box 303017
P. O. Box 303017
Montgomery, AL 36130-3017ChairmanLimestone County Commission
Montgomery, AL 36130-3017
Chairman
Limestone County Commission
310 West Washington Street
310 West Washington Street
Athens, AL 35611Masoud Bajestani, Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Restart
Athens, AL 35611
Masoud Bajestani, Vice President
Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
P. O. Box 2000
P. O. Box 2000
Decatur, AL 35609Robert G. Jones, General ManagerBrowns Ferry Site Operations
Decatur, AL 35609
Robert G. Jones, General Manager
Browns Ferry Site Operations
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant
Tennessee Valley Authority
Tennessee Valley Authority
P. O. Box 2000
P. O. Box 2000
Decatur, AL 35609Distribution w/encl
Decatur, AL 35609
:M. Chernoff, NRR  
Distribution w/encl:
M. Chernoff, NRR
E. Brown, NRR
E. Brown, NRR
S. Shaeffer, RII
S. Shaeffer, RII
RIDSNRRDIRS
RIDSNRRDIRS
PUBLIC  
PUBLIC
 
 
_________________________
OFFICE            RII:DRS        RII:DRP      RII:DRS
SIGNATURE          RA            RA            RA
NAME              LMILLER        MWIDMANN      BBONSER
DATE                  7/17/2006      7/13/2006    7/17/2006    8/  /2006    8/  /2006    8/ /2006    8/ /2006
E-MAIL COPY?        YES      NO  YES      NO  YES      NO    YES      NO    YES      NO  YES    NO    YES    NO
       
            U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                REGION II
Docket No.:        50-259, 50-260, 50-296
License No.:      DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68
Report No:        05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006013
Licensee:          Tennessee Valley Authority
Facility:          Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant
Location:          10833 Shaw Road
                  Athens, AL
Dates:            June 19-23, 2006
Inspectors:        Lee Miller, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
                  Section 1EP2, 1EP3, 1EP4, 1EP5, 4OA1
Approved by:      Brian R. Bonser, Chief
                  Plant Support Branch 2
                  Division of Reactor Safety
                                                                  Enclosure
 
                                  SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006-013; 06/19-23/2006; Browns Ferry
Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Baseline Inspection
The report covered an announced inspection by a Region II emergency preparedness
inspector. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power
reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 3, dated
July 2000.
A.    NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings
      Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
      None
B.    Licensee-Identified Violations.
      None
 
                                                3
1.  REACTOR SAFETY
    Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP2 Alert and Notification System Testing
a.  Inspection Scope
    The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of licensee methods for testing the alert and
    notification system in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, Attachment
    02, Alert and Notification System (ANS) Testing. The applicable planning standard
    10 CFR Part 50.47(b)(5) and its related 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.D
    requirements were used as reference criteria. The criteria contained in NUREG-0654,
    Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and
    Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, was also used as
    references.
    The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this
    report.
b.  Findings
    No findings of significance were identified.
1EP3 Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation
a.  Inspection Scope
    The inspectors reviewed the ERO augmentation staffing requirements and the process
    for notifying the ERO to ensure the readiness of key staff for responding to an event and
    timely facility activation. The results of the December 20, 2005, unannounced off-hours
    augmentation drill was reviewed. The inspectors conducted a review of the backup
    notification systems. The qualification records of key position ERO personnel was
    reviewed to ensure ERO qualifications were current. A sample of problems identified
    from augmentation drills or system tests performed since the last inspection were
    reviewed to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions.
    The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,
    Attachment 03, Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation Testing.
    The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and its related 10 CFR 50,
    Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.
    The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this
    report.


                                                  4
b.  Findings
    No findings of significance were identified.
1EP4 Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes
a.  Inspection Scope
    The inspectors evaluated the associated 10 CFR 50.54(q) reviews associated with non-
    administrative emergency plan, implementing procedures and EAL changes. The
    revision 81 of the Emergency Plan covered the period from 03/22/2005 to 06/19/2006.
    The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,
    Attachment 01, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The
    applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and its related 10 CFR 50, Appendix
    E requirements were used as reference criteria. The criteria contained in
    NUMARC/NESP-007, Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels,
    Revision 2, Regulatory Guide 1.101 were also used as references.
    The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this
    report.
b.  Findings
    No findings of significance were identified.
1EP5 Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies
a.  Inspection Scope
    The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions identified through the EP program to
    determine the significance of the issues and to determine if repeat problems were
    occurring. The facilitys self-assessments and audits were reviewed to assess the
    licensees ability to be self-critical, thus avoiding complacency and degradation of their
    EP program. In addition, inspectors review licensees self-assessments and audits to
    assess the completeness and effectiveness of all EP-related corrective actions.
    The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,
    Attachment 05, Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and
    Deficiencies. The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and its related 10
    CFR 50, Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.
    The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this
    report.
b.  Findings
    No findings of significance were identified.


_________________________OFFICERII:DRSRII:DRPRII:DRSSIGNATURERARARANAMELMILLERMWIDMANNBBONSERDATE7/17/20067/13/20067/17/20068/      /20068/      /20068/      /20068/      /2006
                                                5
E-MAIL COPY?    YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO      YESNO   
4.  OTHER ACTIVITIES
EnclosureU. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONREGION IIDocket No.:50-259, 50-260, 50-296
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
License No.:DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68
  a.  Inspection Scope
Report No:05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006013
    The inspectors reviewed the licensees procedure for developing the data for the
Licensee:Tennessee Valley Authority
    Emergency Preparedness PIs which are: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance; (2) ERO
Facility:Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant
    Drill Participation; and (3) ANS Reliability. The inspectors examined data reported to the
Location:10833 Shaw RoadAthens, ALDates:June 19-23, 2006
    NRC for the period April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006. Procedural guidance for reporting
Inspectors:Lee Miller, Senior Emergency Preparedness InspectorSection 1EP2, 1EP3, 1EP4, 1EP5, 4OA1Approved by:Brian R. Bonser, ChiefPlant Support Branch 2
    PI information and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences
Division of Reactor Safety
    were also reviewed. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill and
SUMMARY OF FINDINGSIR 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006-013; 06/19-23/2006; Browns FerryNuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Baseline InspectionThe report covered an announced inspection by a Region II emergency preparednessinspector.  The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear powerreactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 3, datedJuly 2000.A.NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing FindingsCornerstone:  Emergency PreparednessNoneB.Licensee-Identified Violations.
    exercise performance through review of a sample of drill and event records. The
  None
    inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO
3 1.REACTOR SAFETYCornerstone:  Emergency Preparedness1EP2  Alert and Notification System Testing  a.Inspection ScopeThe inspectors evaluated the adequacy of licensee methods for testing the alert andnotification system in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, Attachment02, "Alert and Notification System (ANS) Testing".  The applicable planning standard
    drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors
10 CFR Part 50.47(b)(5) and its related 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.D
    verified the accuracy of the PI for alert and notification system reliability through review
requirements were used as reference criteria.  The criteria contained in NUREG-0654,"Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and
    of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests.
Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, was also used asreferences.  The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to thisreport.  b.FindingsNo findings of significance were identified.1EP3  Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation  a.Inspection ScopeThe inspectors reviewed the ERO augmentation staffing requirements and the processfor notifying the ERO to ensure the readiness of key staff for responding to an event and
    The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151,
timely facility activation.  The results of the December 20, 2005, unannounced off-hoursaugmentation drill was reviewed.  The inspectors conducted a review of the backupnotification systems.  The qualification records of key position ERO personnel wasreviewed to ensure ERO qualifications were current.  A sample of problems identified
    Performance Indicator Verification. The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.9
from augmentation drills or system tests
    and NEI 99-02, Revision 3, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines,
performed since the last inspection werereviewed to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions.  The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,Attachment 03, "Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation Testing."
    were used as reference criteria. This inspection activity represents three samples on an
The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and its related 10 CFR 50,
    annual basis.
Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to thisreport.
    The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this
4 b.FindingsNo findings of significance were identified.1EP4   Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes  a.Inspection ScopeThe inspectors evaluated the associated 10 CFR 50.54(q) reviews associated with non-administrative emergency plan, implementing procedures and EAL changes.  The
    report.
revision 81 of the Emergency Plan covered the period from 03/22/2005 to 06/19/2006.  The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,Attachment 01, "Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes."  The
  b. Findings
applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and its related 10 CFR 50, Appendix
    No findings of significance were identified.
E requirements were used as reference criteria.  The criteria contained in
4OA6 Meetings, including Exit
NUMARC/NESP-007, "Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels",
    On June 23, 2006, the inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. E. Willis,
Revision 2, Regulatory Guide 1.101 were also used as references.The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to thisreport.  b.FindingsNo findings of significance were identified. 1EP5  Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies a.  Inspection ScopeThe inspectors reviewed the corrective actions identified through the EP program todetermine the significance of the issues and to determine if repeat problems were
    Manager - Operations, and other members of his staff acknowledged the findings. The
occurring.  The facility's self-assessments and audits were reviewed to assess thelicensee's ability to be self-critical, thus avoiding complacency and degradation of theirEP program.  In addition, inspectors review licensee's self-assessments and audits to
    team lead stated that additional information would be accepted and reviewed. The
assess the completeness and effectiveness of all EP-related corrective actions.  The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,Attachment 05, "Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and
    inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or taken during the
Deficiencies."  The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and its related 10
    inspection.
CFR 50, Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to thisreport.  b.  FindingsNo findings of significance were identified.
ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
54.OTHER ACTIVITIES4OA1Performance Indicator (PI) Verification  a. Inspection ScopeThe inspectors reviewed the licensee's procedure for developing the data for theEmergency Preparedness PIs which are: (1) Dr
 
ill and Exercise Performance; (2) ERODrill Participation; and (3) ANS Reliability. The inspectors examined data reported to theNRC for the period April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006. Procedural guidance for reportingPI information and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences
                              SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
were also reviewed. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill and
                                KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
exercise performance through review of a sample of dr
Licensee personnel
ill and event records. Theinspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO
B. OGrady, Site Vice President
drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectorsverified the accuracy of the PI for alert and notification system reliability through reviewof a sample of the licensee's records of periodic system tests. The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151,"Performance Indicator Verification.The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.9
J. DeDomenico, Assistant Plant Manager
and NEI 99-02, Revision 3, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines,"
were used as reference criteria. This inspection activity represents three samples on an
annual basis.The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to thisreport.  b.FindingsNo findings of significance were identified.4OA6Meetings, including ExitOn June 23, 2006, the inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. E. W
illis,Manager - Operations, and other members of his staff acknowledged the findings. The
team lead stated that additional information would be accepted and reviewed. The
inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or taken during the
inspection.ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION  
AttachmentA-1 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATIONKEY POINTS OF CONTACTLicensee personnelB. O'Grady, Site Vice PresidentJ. DeDomenico, Assistant Plant Manager
T. Elms, Manager - Operations
T. Elms, Manager - Operations
T. Feltman, Emergency Preparedness
T. Feltman, Emergency Preparedness
Line 129: Line 279:
W. Crouch, Site Licensing Manager
W. Crouch, Site Licensing Manager
J. Wallace, Site Licensing Engineer
J. Wallace, Site Licensing Engineer
D. White, Nuclear AssuranceLIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
D. White, Nuclear Assurance
OpennedNoneOpenned and ClosedNone
                    LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
ClosedNone
Openned
DiscussedNone
None
AttachmentA-2LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWEDSection 1EP2:   Alert and Notification System TestingProceduresEPIL (Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter) -14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification  System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9
Openned and Closed
None
Closed
None
Discussed
None
                                          A-1                  Attachment
 
                              LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Section 1EP2: Alert and Notification System Testing
Procedures
EPIL (Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter) -14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification
  System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9
EPFS(Emergency Preparedness Field Support)-9, Inspection, Service, and Maintenance of the
EPFS(Emergency Preparedness Field Support)-9, Inspection, Service, and Maintenance of the
Prompt Notification System (PNS) at Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants,
Prompt Notification System (PNS) at Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants,
  Rev. 1Records and DataReviewed the maintenance records 2
Rev. 1
nd  quarter 05 - 1
Records and Data
st quarter 06MiscellaneousObserved annual maintenance on siren #10 6/20/06Section 1EP3: Emergency Response Organization (ERO) AugmentationProceduresTRN-30, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Training, Rev. 12EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40
Reviewed the maintenance records 2nd quarter 05 - 1st quarter 06
EPIL-14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9ETP-101, Site Emergency Director Training, Rev. 8 (lesson plan, handouts, written
Miscellaneous
  examination)
Observed annual maintenance on siren #10 6/20/06
Section 1EP3: Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation
Procedures
TRN-30, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Training, Rev. 12
EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40
EPIL-14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9
ETP-101, Site Emergency Director Training, Rev. 8 (lesson plan, handouts, written
examination)
ETP-102, Site Technical Support Center (TSC), Rev. 7 (lesson plan, handouts, lessons
ETP-102, Site Technical Support Center (TSC), Rev. 7 (lesson plan, handouts, lessons
  learned, written examination)
learned, written examination)
ETP-103, Operations Support Center (OSC), Rev. 7, (lesson plan, handouts, lessons learned,  written examination) Records and DataR92060104851, Orange Team Emergency Preparedness (EP) Unannounced Staffing Dr
ETP-103, Operations Support Center (OSC), Rev. 7, (lesson plan, handouts, lessons learned,
ill, 12/21/05Section 1EP4:Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes ProceduresEPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30
  written examination)
Records and Data
R92060104851, Orange Team Emergency Preparedness (EP) Unannounced Staffing Drill,
  12/21/05
Section 1EP4:Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes
Procedures
EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40
EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30
EPIP-4, Site Area Emergency, Rev. 28
EPIP-4, Site Area Emergency, Rev. 28
EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 33
EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 33
EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the TSC, Rev. 23
EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the TSC, Rev. 23
Radiological Emergency Plan , Rev. 81  
Radiological Emergency Plan , Rev. 81
AttachmentA-3Plans and Changes packagesChange package for Radiological Emergency Plan, Rev. 81Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 39
                                                A-2                              Attachment
 
Plans and Changes packages
Change package for Radiological Emergency Plan, Rev. 81
Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 39
Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40
Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40
Change package for EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30
Change package for EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30
Line 156: Line 336:
Change package for EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 35
Change package for EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 35
Change package for EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) -
Change package for EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) -
   Rev. 24Section 1EP5:Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and DeficienciesProceduresEPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -5, EP Tracking System ActivitiesManagement Oversight System (AMOS), Rev. 5Records and DataMatrix of Scenarios versus Shift Manager and Site Emergency DirectorsPER 101086, Reutilized scenario resulted in Shift Manager being evaluated on same scenario.PER 79742, Ambulance Communications problems
   Rev. 24
Section 1EP5:Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies
Procedures
EPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -5, EP Tracking System Activities
Management Oversight System (AMOS), Rev. 5
Records and Data
Matrix of Scenarios versus Shift Manager and Site Emergency Directors
PER 101086, Reutilized scenario resulted in Shift Manager being evaluated on same scenario.
PER 79742, Ambulance Communications problems
PER 82137, EPIP-1, Table data not displayed
PER 82137, EPIP-1, Table data not displayed
PER 81140, EPIP-3, Appendix A wrong date entered and faxed to Operations Duty Specialist
PER 81140, EPIP-3, Appendix A wrong date entered and faxed to Operations Duty Specialist
PER 82142, OSC Staging Area craftsmen lacking Mask fits
PER 82142, OSC Staging Area craftsmen lacking Mask fits
PER 82145, Integrated Training Drill - Containment venting not reduced or isolatedPER 82147, 2005 Integrated Training Drill - 2-AOI 100-1 two procedure change identifiedPER 84027, Alternate Source Term and Standby Liquid Control system questionsPER 86493, Incorrect revision of training material used during Maintenance Block training
PER 82145, Integrated Training Drill - Containment venting not reduced or isolated
PER 82147, 2005 Integrated Training Drill - 2-AOI 100-1 two procedure change identified
PER 84027, Alternate Source Term and Standby Liquid Control system questions
PER 86493, Incorrect revision of training material used during Maintenance Block training
PER 89240, Emergency Responders - two doors marked Emergency Exits were locked shut
PER 89240, Emergency Responders - two doors marked Emergency Exits were locked shut
PER 100950, Missed Performance Indicator during 2006 Blue Team Training Drill
PER 100950, Missed Performance Indicator during 2006 Blue Team Training Drill
PER 100952, Discrepancy identified on EOI Team dispatched from OSC
PER 100952, Discrepancy identified on EOI Team dispatched from OSC
PER 102322, 3 of 5 candidates misapplied the Emergency Exposure Guidelines in EPIP-15Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) VerificationProceduresEPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -15, Emergency Preparedness PerformanceIndicators, Rev. 10Records and DataDocumentation of DEP opportunities from Operations Simulator evaluations on 04/27/2005, 06/8/2005, 07/13/2005, 10/5/
PER 102322, 3 of 5 candidates misapplied the Emergency Exposure Guidelines in EPIP-15
2005,11/14/05, 11/19/05, 11/21/05, 11/28/05, 12/5/05, 12/12/05Selected training records of drill/exercise participation by ERO personnel during 2005R92051201851, 2005 Radiochemistry (Post Accident Sampling) Drill, 12/1/
Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
2005EPIP-10, MERT, actual event 3/29/05 - contaminated injured person transported to hospitalBlue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs andcompleted procedures), 10/5/05  
Procedures
AttachmentA-4Green Team SAMG Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, playerlogs and completed procedures), 4/26/06
EPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -15, Emergency Preparedness Performance
Red Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs andcompleted procedures), 7/13/06
Indicators, Rev. 10
Blue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs andcompleted procedures), 4/12/06
Records and Data
Data for Drill/Exercise Performance (1 quarter 2005 - 1 quarter 2006)Siren weekly and monthly tests 4/05 thru 3/06
Documentation of DEP opportunities from Operations Simulator evaluations on 04/27/2005,
Siren Maintenance records 4/05 thru 3/06LIST OF ACRONYMSANSAlert and Notification System EALEmergency Action Level
  06/8/2005, 07/13/2005, 10/5/2005,11/14/05, 11/19/05, 11/21/05, 11/28/05, 12/5/05, 12/12/05
EPEmergency Plan  
Selected training records of drill/exercise participation by ERO personnel during 2005
EROEmergency Response Organization
R92051201851, 2005 Radiochemistry (Post Accident Sampling) Drill, 12/1/2005
PIPerformance Indicator
EPIP-10, MERT, actual event 3/29/05 - contaminated injured person transported to hospital
Blue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and
completed procedures), 10/5/05
                                                A-3                                  Attachment
 
Green Team SAMG Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player
logs and completed procedures), 4/26/06
Red Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and
completed procedures), 7/13/06
Blue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and
completed procedures), 4/12/06
Data for Drill/Exercise Performance (1 quarter 2005 - 1 quarter 2006)
Siren weekly and monthly tests 4/05 thru 3/06
Siren Maintenance records 4/05 thru 3/06
                                    LIST OF ACRONYMS
ANS        Alert and Notification System
EAL        Emergency Action Level
EP        Emergency Plan
ERO        Emergency Response Organization
PI        Performance Indicator
                                              A-4                                    Attachment
}}
}}

Revision as of 15:35, 23 November 2019

IR 05000259-06-013, 05000260-06-013, 05000296-06-013; 06/19-23/2006; Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Baseline Inspection
ML062150108
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/17/2006
From: Brian Bonser
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB2
To: Singer K
Tennessee Valley Authority
References
IR-06-013
Download: ML062150108 (13)


See also: IR 05000259/2006013

Text

July 17, 2006

Tennessee Valley Authority

ATTN: Mr. Karl W. Singer

Chief Nuclear Officer and

Executive Vice President

6A Lookout Place

1101 Market Street

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT: BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT - NRC INSPECTION REPORT

05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013 AND 05000296/2006013

Dear Mr. Singer:

On June 23, 2006, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at

your Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection

results, which were discussed on June 23, 2006, with Mr. B. OGrady and other members of

your staff.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and

compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed

personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection no findings of significance were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Brian R. Bonser, Chief

Plant Support Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket Nos. 50-259,05-260, 50-296

License No. DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68

Enclosure: (See page 2)

TVA 2

Enclosure: NRC Inspection Report 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, and

05000296/2006013 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information

cc w/encl:

Ashok S. Bhatnagar

Senior Vice President

Nuclear Operations

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

Larry S. Bryant, Vice President

Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

Brian O'Grady

Site Vice President

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

Preston D. Swafford

Senior Vice President

Nuclear Support

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

General Counsel

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

John C. Fornicola, Manager

Nuclear Assurance and Licensing

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

Bruce M. Aukland, Plant Manager

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

Glenn W. Morris, Manager

Corporate Nuclear Licensing

and Industry Affairs

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

(cc w/encl contd - See page 3)

TVA 3

(cc w/encl contd)

William D. Crouch, Manager

Licensing and Industry Affairs

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee Valley Authority

Electronic Mail Distribution

State Health Officer

Alabama Dept. of Public Health

RSA Tower - Administration

Suite 1552

P. O. Box 303017

Montgomery, AL 36130-3017

Chairman

Limestone County Commission

310 West Washington Street

Athens, AL 35611

Masoud Bajestani, Vice President

Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee Valley Authority

P. O. Box 2000

Decatur, AL 35609

Robert G. Jones, General Manager

Browns Ferry Site Operations

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

Tennessee Valley Authority

P. O. Box 2000

Decatur, AL 35609

Distribution w/encl:

M. Chernoff, NRR

E. Brown, NRR

S. Shaeffer, RII

RIDSNRRDIRS

PUBLIC

_________________________

OFFICE RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRS

SIGNATURE RA RA RA

NAME LMILLER MWIDMANN BBONSER

DATE 7/17/2006 7/13/2006 7/17/2006 8/ /2006 8/ /2006 8/ /2006 8/ /2006

E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

Docket No.: 50-259, 50-260, 50-296

License No.: DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68

Report No: 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006013

Licensee: Tennessee Valley Authority

Facility: Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant

Location: 10833 Shaw Road

Athens, AL

Dates: June 19-23, 2006

Inspectors: Lee Miller, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector

Section 1EP2, 1EP3, 1EP4, 1EP5, 4OA1

Approved by: Brian R. Bonser, Chief

Plant Support Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000259/2006013, 05000260/2006013, 05000296/2006-013; 06/19-23/2006; Browns Ferry

Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Baseline Inspection

The report covered an announced inspection by a Region II emergency preparedness

inspector. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power

reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 3, dated

July 2000.

A. NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

None

B. Licensee-Identified Violations.

None

3

1. REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

1EP2 Alert and Notification System Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of licensee methods for testing the alert and

notification system in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114, Attachment

02, Alert and Notification System (ANS) Testing. The applicable planning standard

10 CFR Part 50.47(b)(5) and its related 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.D

requirements were used as reference criteria. The criteria contained in NUREG-0654,

Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and

Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 1, was also used as

references.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this

report.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1EP3 Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the ERO augmentation staffing requirements and the process

for notifying the ERO to ensure the readiness of key staff for responding to an event and

timely facility activation. The results of the December 20, 2005, unannounced off-hours

augmentation drill was reviewed. The inspectors conducted a review of the backup

notification systems. The qualification records of key position ERO personnel was

reviewed to ensure ERO qualifications were current. A sample of problems identified

from augmentation drills or system tests performed since the last inspection were

reviewed to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,

Attachment 03, Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation Testing.

The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(2) and its related 10 CFR 50,

Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this

report.

4

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1EP4 Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors evaluated the associated 10 CFR 50.54(q) reviews associated with non-

administrative emergency plan, implementing procedures and EAL changes. The

revision 81 of the Emergency Plan covered the period from 03/22/2005 to 06/19/2006.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,

Attachment 01, Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes. The

applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4) and its related 10 CFR 50, Appendix

E requirements were used as reference criteria. The criteria contained in

NUMARC/NESP-007, Methodology for Development of Emergency Action Levels,

Revision 2, Regulatory Guide 1.101 were also used as references.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this

report.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1EP5 Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the corrective actions identified through the EP program to

determine the significance of the issues and to determine if repeat problems were

occurring. The facilitys self-assessments and audits were reviewed to assess the

licensees ability to be self-critical, thus avoiding complacency and degradation of their

EP program. In addition, inspectors review licensees self-assessments and audits to

assess the completeness and effectiveness of all EP-related corrective actions.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71114,

Attachment 05, Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and

Deficiencies. The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and its related 10

CFR 50, Appendix E requirements were used as reference criteria.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this

report.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

5

4. OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the licensees procedure for developing the data for the

Emergency Preparedness PIs which are: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance; (2) ERO

Drill Participation; and (3) ANS Reliability. The inspectors examined data reported to the

NRC for the period April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2006. Procedural guidance for reporting

PI information and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences

were also reviewed. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill and

exercise performance through review of a sample of drill and event records. The

inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO

drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors

verified the accuracy of the PI for alert and notification system reliability through review

of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests.

The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151,

Performance Indicator Verification. The applicable planning standard, 10 CFR 50.9

and NEI 99-02, Revision 3, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines,

were used as reference criteria. This inspection activity represents three samples on an

annual basis.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this

report.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, including Exit

On June 23, 2006, the inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. E. Willis,

Manager - Operations, and other members of his staff acknowledged the findings. The

team lead stated that additional information would be accepted and reviewed. The

inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or taken during the

inspection.

ATTACHMENT: SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

B. OGrady, Site Vice President

J. DeDomenico, Assistant Plant Manager

T. Elms, Manager - Operations

T. Feltman, Emergency Preparedness

B. Marks, Emergency Services - Corporate

R. Delong, Site Engineering Manager

W. Crouch, Site Licensing Manager

J. Wallace, Site Licensing Engineer

D. White, Nuclear Assurance

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

Openned

None

Openned and Closed

None

Closed

None

Discussed

None

A-1 Attachment

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1EP2: Alert and Notification System Testing

Procedures

EPIL (Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter) -14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification

System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9

EPFS(Emergency Preparedness Field Support)-9, Inspection, Service, and Maintenance of the

Prompt Notification System (PNS) at Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants,

Rev. 1

Records and Data

Reviewed the maintenance records 2nd quarter 05 - 1st quarter 06

Miscellaneous

Observed annual maintenance on siren #10 6/20/06

Section 1EP3: Emergency Response Organization (ERO) Augmentation

Procedures

TRN-30, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Training, Rev. 12

EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40

EPIL-14, Facilitation of the Prompt Notification System and Pager Tests, Rev. 9

ETP-101, Site Emergency Director Training, Rev. 8 (lesson plan, handouts, written

examination)

ETP-102, Site Technical Support Center (TSC), Rev. 7 (lesson plan, handouts, lessons

learned, written examination)

ETP-103, Operations Support Center (OSC), Rev. 7, (lesson plan, handouts, lessons learned,

written examination)

Records and Data

R92060104851, Orange Team Emergency Preparedness (EP) Unannounced Staffing Drill,

12/21/05

Section 1EP4:Emergency Action Level (EAL) and Emergency Plan Changes

Procedures

EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40

EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30

EPIP-4, Site Area Emergency, Rev. 28

EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 33

EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the TSC, Rev. 23

Radiological Emergency Plan , Rev. 81

A-2 Attachment

Plans and Changes packages

Change package for Radiological Emergency Plan, Rev. 81

Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 39

Change package for EPIP-1, Emergency Classification Procedure, Rev. 40

Change package for EPIP-3, Alert, Rev. 30

Change package for EPIP-2, Notification of Unusual Event, Rev. 27

Change package for EPIP-4, Site Area Emergency, Rev. 29

Change package for EPIP-5, General Emergency, Rev. 35

Change package for EPIP-6, Activation and Operation of the Technical Support Center (TSC) -

Rev. 24

Section 1EP5:Correction of Emergency Preparedness Weaknesses and Deficiencies

Procedures

EPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -5, EP Tracking System Activities

Management Oversight System (AMOS), Rev. 5

Records and Data

Matrix of Scenarios versus Shift Manager and Site Emergency Directors

PER 101086, Reutilized scenario resulted in Shift Manager being evaluated on same scenario.

PER 79742, Ambulance Communications problems

PER 82137, EPIP-1, Table data not displayed

PER 81140, EPIP-3, Appendix A wrong date entered and faxed to Operations Duty Specialist

PER 82142, OSC Staging Area craftsmen lacking Mask fits

PER 82145, Integrated Training Drill - Containment venting not reduced or isolated

PER 82147, 2005 Integrated Training Drill - 2-AOI 100-1 two procedure change identified

PER 84027, Alternate Source Term and Standby Liquid Control system questions

PER 86493, Incorrect revision of training material used during Maintenance Block training

PER 89240, Emergency Responders - two doors marked Emergency Exits were locked shut

PER 100950, Missed Performance Indicator during 2006 Blue Team Training Drill

PER 100952, Discrepancy identified on EOI Team dispatched from OSC

PER 102322, 3 of 5 candidates misapplied the Emergency Exposure Guidelines in EPIP-15

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

Procedures

EPIL [Emergency Preparedness Instruction Letter] -15, Emergency Preparedness Performance

Indicators, Rev. 10

Records and Data

Documentation of DEP opportunities from Operations Simulator evaluations on 04/27/2005,

06/8/2005, 07/13/2005, 10/5/2005,11/14/05, 11/19/05, 11/21/05, 11/28/05, 12/5/05, 12/12/05

Selected training records of drill/exercise participation by ERO personnel during 2005

R92051201851, 2005 Radiochemistry (Post Accident Sampling) Drill, 12/1/2005

EPIP-10, MERT, actual event 3/29/05 - contaminated injured person transported to hospital

Blue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and

completed procedures), 10/5/05

A-3 Attachment

Green Team SAMG Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player

logs and completed procedures), 4/26/06

Red Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and

completed procedures), 7/13/06

Blue Team Training Drill package (scenario, time line, event notification forms, player logs and

completed procedures), 4/12/06

Data for Drill/Exercise Performance (1 quarter 2005 - 1 quarter 2006)

Siren weekly and monthly tests 4/05 thru 3/06

Siren Maintenance records 4/05 thru 3/06

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ANS Alert and Notification System

EAL Emergency Action Level

EP Emergency Plan

ERO Emergency Response Organization

PI Performance Indicator

A-4 Attachment