ML080700362: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A QID #3 The task of using the logic trees and diagnostic charts to assess safety function during the EOPs is part of the SROs function and 009 Small Break not the Reactor Operator. The RO will provide the parameters and LOCA indications to the SRO to make this assessment; therefore a Generic 2.4.21 - credible CFR 41 RO tie can not be developed. | ||
Assessing status of Generic 2.4.6 - Knowledge of Symptom based EOP mitigation safety functions strategies was randomly selected as a replacement from the using parameters and required section 2.4 generic K&A statements in accordance with logic. ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
This Generic K&A statement is not applicable to the requirements for this EOP procedure; therefore a credible CFR 41 RO tie can not be developed. Generic 2.1.28 - Knowledge of the purpose and function of major system components and controls was randomly selected as a replacement from the required section 2.1 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | QID #7 This K&A has an asterisk and is not applicable to ANO since the HPI pumps are normally secured during RHR operations; 025 Loss of RHR therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be System developed on this K&A. | ||
AA1.20 - HPI AA1.12 - RCS Temperature Indication was randomly selected as a switches, indicators, RO Exam replacement from the other AA1 K&A statements under this lights and flow category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5. | |||
Tier 1 meters. | |||
Group 1 This KA knowledge was already used in QID #11; therefore, an QID #14 alternate K&A was chosen to prevent over sampling natural circulation criteria knowledge 055 Station Blackout EK1 - Effect of battery discharge rates on capacity was selected as EK1.02 - Natural a replacement as it was the only other EK1 K&A statement under Circulation Cooling this category. | |||
This Generic K&A statement is not applicable to the requirements QID #15 for this EOP procedure; therefore a credible CFR 41 RO tie can not 056 Loss of Off-site be developed. | |||
Power Generic 2.1.28 - Knowledge of the purpose and function of major Generic 2.1.1 - system components and controls was randomly selected as a Knowledge of replacement from the required section 2.1 generic K&A statements conduct of in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
operations requirements. | |||
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 1 of 4 | |||
Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A This K&A has an asterisk and is not applicable to ANO since we QID #31 do not have a piggy back mode of RHR with HPI pumps; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be 005 Residual Heat developed on this K&A. | |||
Removal System K4.07 - System protection logics, including high-pressure K4.08 Line up for interlock, reset controls, and valve interlock, was randomly piggy back mode selected as a replacement from the other K4 K&A statements with HPI. under this category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5. | |||
RO Exam Tier 2 Group 2 | The Containment Spray Chemical Addition Tank was removed QID #41 from service at ANO and replace with chemical baskets in the 026 Containment basement of Containment; therefore, a credible and operationally Spray valid question can not be developed on this K&A. | ||
A1.05 - Chemical A1.06 - Containment spray pump cooling was randomly selected additive tank level as a replacement from the other A1 K&A statements under this and concentration. category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5. | |||
RO Exam The Auxiliary Feed Pump (AFW) (non safety) is a motor driven Tier 2 QID #42 pump and has no interrelated tie with the Main and Reheat Steam Group 1 039 Main and System; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can Reheat Steam System not be developed on this K&A. | |||
K3.03 - Loss of K3.05 - RCS was randomly selected as a replacement from the MRSS on AFW other K3 K&A statements under this category with a RO pump. importance rating of > 2.5. | |||
QID #48 It would be difficult to develop a credible exam question with a tie 063 DC Electrical to the DC Electrical Distribution system for this KA since the Distribution communication circuits at ANO are normally AC auctioneered powered; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can Generic 2.4.43 - not be developed on this K&A. | |||
Knowledge of emergency Generic 2.4.31 - Knowledge of annunciators alarms and communication indications, and use of the response instructions was randomly systems and selected as a replacement from the required section 2.4 generic techniques. K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
QID #62 There is no direct tie between the Condensate system and the limitations and conditions for operation in the facility license; RO Exam 056 Condensate therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be Tier 2 developed on this K&A. | |||
Generic 2.1.10 - | |||
Group 2 Knowledge of Generic 2.1.27 - Knowledge of system purpose and or function condition and was randomly selected as a replacement from the required Section limitation in the 2.1 Generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 facility license. Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 2 of 4 | |||
QID # | Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A The Containment Purge System was sampled in QIDs 22 and 59, QID #73 therefore, an alternate K&A was chosen to prevent over sampling RO Exam Generic 2.3.09 - this system. | ||
Tier 3 Knowledge of the Generic 2.3.10 - Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive process for levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure was performing a randomly selected as a replacement from Section 2.3 Generic Containment Purge K&A statements with a RO importance rating of > 2.5. | |||
A Loss of Main Feedwater while shutdown would not be an event QID #77 for the SRO candidate and there is no credible tie between the K&A statement and the Loss of Feedwater EOP. Also the Major 054 Loss of Main event in one of the scenarios in the operating exam is very similar Feedwater to this subject category; therefore this subject category was SRO Exam rejected. | |||
Generic 2.2.18 - | |||
Tier 1 Knowledge of Generic 2.2.22 - Knowledge of limiting conditions for operations Group 1 maintenance and safety limits was randomly selected as a replacement from the activities during required section 2.2 generic K&A statements in accordance with shutdown ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. The 017 RCP Malfunction (Loss of operations. RC Flow) was randomly selected as a replacement subject category. | |||
QID #82 This K&A knowledge was sampled on the RO sample plan Tier 3 QID #71 and since the SRO candidates will be taking the RO 024 Emergency section of the exam, there is no justification or operationally valid Boration reason to generate another question on this K&A statement. | |||
Generic 2.3.01 - | |||
Generic 2.4.6 - Knowledge of symptom based EOP mitigation Knowledge of 10 strategies was randomly selected as a replacement from the CFR 20 and related required section 2 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-facility radiation 401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
control requirements. | |||
QID #84 This K&A knowledge was sampled on the RO sample plan Tier 3 068 Control Room QID #71 and since the SRO candidates will be taking the RO Evacuation section of the exam, there is no justification or operationally valid SRO Exam reason to generate another question on this K&A statement. | |||
Tier 1 Generic 2.3.01 - | |||
Knowledge of 10 Generic 2.4.4 - Ability to recognize abnormal indications for Group 2 system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for CFR 20 and related facility radiation emergency and abnormal operating procedures was randomly control selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A requirements. statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
This K&A knowledge will be sampled on one of the Admin JPMs QID #88 and a dynamic scenario on the operating Test and thus was rejected 059 Main Feedwater due to over sampling this K&A. Based on discussions with the Lead NRC Examiner, this system was also rejected. | |||
Generic 2.4.30 System 026, Containment Spray and generic K&A 2.4.6, Knowledge of the Knowledge of symptom Based EOP mitigation strategies, was Emergency Plan randomly selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 3 of 4 | |||
There is no | There is no credible 10 CFR 43 SRO tie between this K&A QID #91 statement and the originally selected Station Air System; therefore, 079 Station Air a credible and operationally valid question can not be developed on System this K&A statement or any others Station Air K&A statements. | ||
SRO Exam (most have an importance rating of less than 2.5) | |||
Generic 2.4.38 - | |||
Tier 2 Ability to take action Based on this selection, the Control Rod Drive System was Group 2 in the E-Plan randomly selected from the Tier 2 Group 2 systems and the procedure acting as originally selected K&A statement: Ability to take actions called the emergency for in the facility emergency plan, including (if required) coordinator. supporting or acting as emergency coordinator was retained for question generation. | |||
QID #100 This K&A is also RO knowledge and does not allow an SRO only question to be developed thus this K&A was rejected. | |||
Generic 2.4.34 Knowledge of RO task performed Generic K&A 2.4.4, Ability to recognize abnormal indications for SRO Exam outside the main system operating parameters which are entry level conditions for Tier 1 control room during emergency and abnormal operating procedures, was randomly emergency selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A operations including statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. | |||
system geography and system implications. | |||
(most have an importance rating of less than 2.5) Based on this selection, the Control Rod Drive System was randomly selected from the Tier 2 Group 2 systems and the originally selected K&A statement: | NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 4 of 4}} | ||
Ability to take actions called for in the facility emergency plan, including (if required) supporting or acting as emergency coordinator was retained for question generation | |||
This K&A is also RO knowledge and does not allow an SRO only question to be developed thus this K&A was rejected. | |||
Generic K&A 2.4.4, Ability to recognize abnormal indications for system operating parameters which are entry level conditions for emergency and abnormal operating procedures, was randomly selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.}} | |||
Revision as of 18:49, 14 November 2019
| ML080700362 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 02/29/2008 |
| From: | Garchow S Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Entergy Operations |
| References | |
| 50-313/08-301, 50-368/08-301, ES-401-4 50-313/08-301, 50-368/08-301 | |
| Download: ML080700362 (4) | |
Text
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401-4 Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A QID #3 The task of using the logic trees and diagnostic charts to assess safety function during the EOPs is part of the SROs function and 009 Small Break not the Reactor Operator. The RO will provide the parameters and LOCA indications to the SRO to make this assessment; therefore a Generic 2.4.21 - credible CFR 41 RO tie can not be developed.
Assessing status of Generic 2.4.6 - Knowledge of Symptom based EOP mitigation safety functions strategies was randomly selected as a replacement from the using parameters and required section 2.4 generic K&A statements in accordance with logic. ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
QID #7 This K&A has an asterisk and is not applicable to ANO since the HPI pumps are normally secured during RHR operations; 025 Loss of RHR therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be System developed on this K&A.
AA1.20 - HPI AA1.12 - RCS Temperature Indication was randomly selected as a switches, indicators, RO Exam replacement from the other AA1 K&A statements under this lights and flow category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5.
Tier 1 meters.
Group 1 This KA knowledge was already used in QID #11; therefore, an QID #14 alternate K&A was chosen to prevent over sampling natural circulation criteria knowledge 055 Station Blackout EK1 - Effect of battery discharge rates on capacity was selected as EK1.02 - Natural a replacement as it was the only other EK1 K&A statement under Circulation Cooling this category.
This Generic K&A statement is not applicable to the requirements QID #15 for this EOP procedure; therefore a credible CFR 41 RO tie can not 056 Loss of Off-site be developed.
Power Generic 2.1.28 - Knowledge of the purpose and function of major Generic 2.1.1 - system components and controls was randomly selected as a Knowledge of replacement from the required section 2.1 generic K&A statements conduct of in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
operations requirements.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 1 of 4
Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A This K&A has an asterisk and is not applicable to ANO since we QID #31 do not have a piggy back mode of RHR with HPI pumps; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be 005 Residual Heat developed on this K&A.
Removal System K4.07 - System protection logics, including high-pressure K4.08 Line up for interlock, reset controls, and valve interlock, was randomly piggy back mode selected as a replacement from the other K4 K&A statements with HPI. under this category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5.
The Containment Spray Chemical Addition Tank was removed QID #41 from service at ANO and replace with chemical baskets in the 026 Containment basement of Containment; therefore, a credible and operationally Spray valid question can not be developed on this K&A.
A1.05 - Chemical A1.06 - Containment spray pump cooling was randomly selected additive tank level as a replacement from the other A1 K&A statements under this and concentration. category with a RO importance rating of > 2.5.
RO Exam The Auxiliary Feed Pump (AFW) (non safety) is a motor driven Tier 2 QID #42 pump and has no interrelated tie with the Main and Reheat Steam Group 1 039 Main and System; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can Reheat Steam System not be developed on this K&A.
K3.03 - Loss of K3.05 - RCS was randomly selected as a replacement from the MRSS on AFW other K3 K&A statements under this category with a RO pump. importance rating of > 2.5.
QID #48 It would be difficult to develop a credible exam question with a tie 063 DC Electrical to the DC Electrical Distribution system for this KA since the Distribution communication circuits at ANO are normally AC auctioneered powered; therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can Generic 2.4.43 - not be developed on this K&A.
Knowledge of emergency Generic 2.4.31 - Knowledge of annunciators alarms and communication indications, and use of the response instructions was randomly systems and selected as a replacement from the required section 2.4 generic techniques. K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
QID #62 There is no direct tie between the Condensate system and the limitations and conditions for operation in the facility license; RO Exam 056 Condensate therefore, a credible and operationally valid question can not be Tier 2 developed on this K&A.
Generic 2.1.10 -
Group 2 Knowledge of Generic 2.1.27 - Knowledge of system purpose and or function condition and was randomly selected as a replacement from the required Section limitation in the 2.1 Generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 facility license. Attachment 2 Item 1.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 2 of 4
Tier / Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected K/A The Containment Purge System was sampled in QIDs 22 and 59, QID #73 therefore, an alternate K&A was chosen to prevent over sampling RO Exam Generic 2.3.09 - this system.
Tier 3 Knowledge of the Generic 2.3.10 - Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive process for levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure was performing a randomly selected as a replacement from Section 2.3 Generic Containment Purge K&A statements with a RO importance rating of > 2.5.
A Loss of Main Feedwater while shutdown would not be an event QID #77 for the SRO candidate and there is no credible tie between the K&A statement and the Loss of Feedwater EOP. Also the Major 054 Loss of Main event in one of the scenarios in the operating exam is very similar Feedwater to this subject category; therefore this subject category was SRO Exam rejected.
Generic 2.2.18 -
Tier 1 Knowledge of Generic 2.2.22 - Knowledge of limiting conditions for operations Group 1 maintenance and safety limits was randomly selected as a replacement from the activities during required section 2.2 generic K&A statements in accordance with shutdown ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1. The 017 RCP Malfunction (Loss of operations. RC Flow) was randomly selected as a replacement subject category.
QID #82 This K&A knowledge was sampled on the RO sample plan Tier 3 QID #71 and since the SRO candidates will be taking the RO 024 Emergency section of the exam, there is no justification or operationally valid Boration reason to generate another question on this K&A statement.
Generic 2.3.01 -
Generic 2.4.6 - Knowledge of symptom based EOP mitigation Knowledge of 10 strategies was randomly selected as a replacement from the CFR 20 and related required section 2 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-facility radiation 401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
control requirements.
QID #84 This K&A knowledge was sampled on the RO sample plan Tier 3 068 Control Room QID #71 and since the SRO candidates will be taking the RO Evacuation section of the exam, there is no justification or operationally valid SRO Exam reason to generate another question on this K&A statement.
Tier 1 Generic 2.3.01 -
Knowledge of 10 Generic 2.4.4 - Ability to recognize abnormal indications for Group 2 system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for CFR 20 and related facility radiation emergency and abnormal operating procedures was randomly control selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A requirements. statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
This K&A knowledge will be sampled on one of the Admin JPMs QID #88 and a dynamic scenario on the operating Test and thus was rejected 059 Main Feedwater due to over sampling this K&A. Based on discussions with the Lead NRC Examiner, this system was also rejected.
Generic 2.4.30 System 026, Containment Spray and generic K&A 2.4.6, Knowledge of the Knowledge of symptom Based EOP mitigation strategies, was Emergency Plan randomly selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 3 of 4
There is no credible 10 CFR 43 SRO tie between this K&A QID #91 statement and the originally selected Station Air System; therefore, 079 Station Air a credible and operationally valid question can not be developed on System this K&A statement or any others Station Air K&A statements.
SRO Exam (most have an importance rating of less than 2.5)
Generic 2.4.38 -
Tier 2 Ability to take action Based on this selection, the Control Rod Drive System was Group 2 in the E-Plan randomly selected from the Tier 2 Group 2 systems and the procedure acting as originally selected K&A statement: Ability to take actions called the emergency for in the facility emergency plan, including (if required) coordinator. supporting or acting as emergency coordinator was retained for question generation.
QID #100 This K&A is also RO knowledge and does not allow an SRO only question to be developed thus this K&A was rejected.
Generic 2.4.34 Knowledge of RO task performed Generic K&A 2.4.4, Ability to recognize abnormal indications for SRO Exam outside the main system operating parameters which are entry level conditions for Tier 1 control room during emergency and abnormal operating procedures, was randomly emergency selected as a replacement from the required section 2 generic K&A operations including statements in accordance with ES-401 Attachment 2 Item 1.
system geography and system implications.
NUREG-1021, Revision 9 Page 4 of 4